DOCSLIB.ORG

Removal of Creosote-Treated Pilings and Structures from San Francisco Bay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Removal of Creosote-Treated Pilings and Structures from San Francisco Bay Removal of Creosote-Treated Pilings and Structures from San Francisco Bay Prepared by Christine Werme,a Jennifer Hunt,b Erin Beller,b Kristen Cayce,b Marcus Klatt,b Aroon Melwani,b Eric Polson,c and Robin Grossingerb a Independent Consultant, Berkeley, CA b San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland, CA c Eric Polson Engineering, Novato, CA Prepared for California State Coastal Conservancy 1330 Broadway, 13th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612 CONTRIBUTION NO. 605 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE 7770 Pardee Lane, Second floor, Oakland, CA 94621 DECEMBER p: 510-746-7334 (SFEI), f: 510-746-7300, www.sfei.org 2010 This report should be cited as: Werme, C., J. Hunt, E. Beller, K. Cayce, M. Klatt, A. Melwani, E. Polson, and R. Grossinger. (2010). Removal of Creosote-Treated Pilings and Structures from San Francisco Bay. Prepared for California State Coastal Conservancy. Contribution No. 605. San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland, California. Creosote-Treated Structures in San Francisco Bay - i Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Subtidal Habitat Goals Project and Artificial Substrates in San Francisco Bay 2 1.2 San Francisco Bay .................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Creosote-Treated Wood in San Francisco Bay ......................................................... 9 1.4 Lessons from Other Locations ................................................................................ 10 2. Mapping ........................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Methods .................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Numbers, Locations, and Hot Spots ....................................................................... 17 2.3 How to Use the Information ................................................................................... 21 3. Environmental Assessment ........................................................................................... 22 3.1 Properties of Creosote ............................................................................................. 22 3.2 PAHs in San Francisco Bay .................................................................................... 24 3.3 Potential Environmental Risks ................................................................................ 28 3.4 Possible Environmental Benefits ............................................................................ 30 4. Historical Significance Assessment .............................................................................. 33 4.1 Pilings as Cultural Features .................................................................................... 33 4.2 Methods for Evaluating Significance in San Francisco Bay .................................. 34 5. Action Plan.................................................................................................................... 39 5.1 Removal Techniques and Costs .............................................................................. 39 5.2 Disposal and Reuse Options and Costs ................................................................... 42 5.3 Encapsulation Techniques ...................................................................................... 43 5.4 Permitting and Ownership Issues ........................................................................... 43 5.5 Removal of Creosote-treated Debris from Intertidal Areas .................................... 45 6. Other Artificial Substrate .............................................................................................. 47 6.1 Options for Removal or Replacement of Existing Structures ................................. 47 6.2 Suggestions for Replacement and New Structures ................................................. 49 7. Conclusions and Next Steps.......................................................................................... 50 References ......................................................................................................................... 58 List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 65 Creosote-Treated Structures in San Francisco Bay - ii List of Figures Figure 1-1. San Francisco Bay project extent and sub-regions .......................................... 5 Figure 1-2. Distribution of eelgrass beds and other submerged aquatic vegetation in San Francisco Bay...................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 1-3. Historical herring spawning areas in San Francisco Bay ................................. 8 Figure 1-4. Tons of creosote-treated pilings and debris have been removed from Puget Sound ................................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 1-5. The Hudson River Park Trust removed decking but is committed to preservation of piles as habitat for invertebrate and fish species...................................... 12 Figure 2-1. Mapping coverage by NOAA and SFEI ........................................................ 14 Figure 2-2. Bing Maps Birds Eye screenshot from the south side of Brooks Island, Richmond. ......................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 2-3. Bing Maps screenshot with outline depicting complexes to be mapped in Google Earth ..................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 2-4. Pilings and piling complexes in San Francisco Bay ...................................... 18 Figure 2-5. Piling hot spots ............................................................................................... 20 Figure 3-1. Visible apparent creosote slick detected during field mapping in San Francisco Bay.................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 3-2. Total PAHs in San Francisco Bay sediments ................................................. 26 Figure 3-3. Number of observations and cumulative probability of total PAHs in San Francisco Bay sediments................................................................................................... 27 Figure 3-4. Creosote-treated pilings, historic range of Pacific herring spawning habit, and current and potential eelgrass habitat, including an inset of the Point Richmond area .... 31 Figure 3-5. Sea lions at Pier 39, San Francisco waterfront ............................................... 32 Figure 4-1. Evaluation of piling groups based on National Register criteria ................... 35 Figure 4-2. Piling significance scenarios: 2a, pilings associated with a significant onshore structure; 2b, extensive complex retaining ability to convey form, function, and association; 2c, association with an archeologically significant site; 2d, element in a multiple-property district .................................................................................................. 38 Figure 5-1. Environmental work windows in San Francisco Bay .................................... 41 Figure 5-2. Intertidal debris at Point Richmond ............................................................... 45 Figure 7-1. Old pilings may be hazards to navigation ...................................................... 53 Figure 7-2. The old ferry terminal at Miller-Knox Regional Shoreline in Richmond is of historic interest .................................................................................................................. 55 Figure 7-3. Abandoned pilings in San Francisco Bay—romantic reminders of the past or eyesores? .......................................................................................................................... 56 Final Report Creosote-Treated Structures in San Francisco Bay - iii List of Tables Table 1. Potential attributes of high-priority removal projects ......................................... vii Table 1-1. Questions about creosote-treated pilings San Francisco Bay. ........................... 2 Table 1-2. Types of artificial substrate in San Francisco Bay ............................................ 3 Table 2-1. List of attributes included in the database ....................................................... 17 Table 2-2. Pilings and piling complexes in sub-regions of San Francisco Bay. ............... 19 Table 2-3. Number of piles, complexes, and area in identified hot spots. ........................ 21 Table 3-1. Estimated loads of PAHs to San Francisco Bay .............................................. 25 Table 7-1. Answers to questions posed at the beginning of the project. .......................... 50 Table 7-2. Possible additional studies suggested from the project ................................... 51 Table 7-3. Potential attributes of high-priority removal projects ..................................... 51 List of Appendices Appendix A. Mapping Appendix B. Environmental Assessment Appendix C. Historical Significance Appendix D. Action Plan Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agenda Packet Is Available for Download at Weta.Sanfranciscobayferry.Com
    Members of the Board SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER EMERGENCY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY James Wunderman, Chair BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING Jessica Alba Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. Jeffrey DelBono Anthony J. Intintoli, Jr. VIDEOCONFERENCE Monique Moyer Join WETA BOD Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89718217408 Meeting ID: 897 1821 7408 Password: 33779 Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) The full agenda packet is available for download at weta.sanfranciscobayferry.com AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVE FY 2022-2024 TITLE VI PROGRAM Action 4. PRELIMINARY FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 OPERATING AND CAPITAL Information BUDGETS 5. WETA BUSINESS PLAN CONCEPT AND ORGANIZATION Information ADJOURNMENT All items appearing on the agenda are subject to action by the Board of Directors. Staff recommendations are subject to action and change by the Board of Directors. CHANGES RELATED TO COVID-19 Consistent with Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, effective immediately and until further notice, meetings will be conducted through virtual participation to promote social distancing and reduce the chance of COVID-19 transmission. PUBLIC COMMENTS As this is a special meeting of the Board, public comments are limited to the listed agenda items. If you know in advance that you would like to make a public comment during the videoconference, please email [email protected] with your name and item number you would like to provide comment on no later than 15 Water Emergency Transportation Authority May 20, 2021 Meeting of the Board of Directors minutes after the start of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Plan
    San Francisco Bay Plan San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission In memory of Senator J. Eugene McAteer, a leader in efforts to plan for the conservation of San Francisco Bay and the development of its shoreline. Photo Credits: Michael Bry: Inside front cover, facing Part I, facing Part II Richard Persoff: Facing Part III Rondal Partridge: Facing Part V, Inside back cover Mike Schweizer: Page 34 Port of Oakland: Page 11 Port of San Francisco: Page 68 Commission Staff: Facing Part IV, Page 59 Map Source: Tidal features, salt ponds, and other diked areas, derived from the EcoAtlas Version 1.0bc, 1996, San Francisco Estuary Institute. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 PHONE: (415) 352-3600 January 2008 To the Citizens of the San Francisco Bay Region and Friends of San Francisco Bay Everywhere: The San Francisco Bay Plan was completed and adopted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 1968 and submitted to the California Legislature and Governor in January 1969. The Bay Plan was prepared by the Commission over a three-year period pursuant to the McAteer-Petris Act of 1965 which established the Commission as a temporary agency to prepare an enforceable plan to guide the future protection and use of San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. In 1969, the Legislature acted upon the Commission’s recommendations in the Bay Plan and revised the McAteer-Petris Act by designating the Commission as the agency responsible for maintaining and carrying out the provisions of the Act and the Bay Plan for the protection of the Bay and its great natural resources and the development of the Bay and shore- line to their highest potential with a minimum of Bay fill.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Abundance and Distribution of Nesting Double-Crested Cormorants Phalacrocorax Auritus in the San Francisco Bay Area, 1975–2017
    Rauzon et al.: Changes in nesting Double-Crested Cormorants in San Francisco Bay area 127 CHANGES IN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF NESTING DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS PHALACROCORAX AURITUS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, 1975–2017 MARK J. RAUZON1*, MEREDITH L. ELLIOTT2, PHILLIP J. CAPITOLO3, L. MAX TARJAN4, GERARD J. McCHESNEY5, JOHN P. KELLY6 & HARRY R. CARTER7† 1Laney College, Geography Department, 900 Fallon Street, Oakland, CA 94607, USA *([email protected]) 2Point Blue Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive, #11, Petaluma, CA 94954, USA 3Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, 115 McAllister Way, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 4San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory, 524 Valley Way, Milpitas, CA 95035, USA 5US Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 1 Marshlands Road, Fremont, CA 94555, USA 6Audubon Canyon Ranch, Cypress Grove Research Center, P.O. Box 808, Marshall, CA 94940, USA 7Humboldt State University, Department of Wildlife, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA †Deceased Received 19 October 2018, accepted 13 February 2019 ABSTRACT RAUZON, M.J., ELLIOTT, M.L., CAPITOLO, P.J., TARJAN, L.M., McCHESNEY, G.J., KELLY, J.P. & CARTER, H.R. 2019. Changes in abundance and distribution of nesting Double-crested Cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus in the San Francisco Bay area, 1975–2017. Marine Ornithology 47: 127–138. In the San Francisco Bay area, California, the Double-crested Cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus population has recovered from significant declines to reach breeding population sizes comparable to those from the late 19th century, when only one colony offshore at the South Farallon Islands (SFI) was known.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Seal Annual Report 2005
    Harbor Seal Monitoring at Point Reyes National Seashore and Golden Gate National Recreation Area Annual Report 2005 Prepared by: Melanie Vanderhoof and Sarah Allen 1 Introduction Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardii) are the dominant and only year round resident pinniped at Point Reyes, California. The Point Reyes seal population represents the largest concentration of harbor seals in the State of California, other than the Channel Islands, accounting for 20% of the mainland breeding population (Lowry and Carretta 2003). Much of the Point Reyes coastal zone remains fairly pristine and provides excellent marine and terrestrial habitat for seals to rest, molt feed and breed where human encroachment is minimal. Long-term monitoring studies of harbor seals have been conducted at selected colonies at Point Reyes since 1976 (Allen et al. 1989, Sydeman and Allen 1999, Allen et al. 2004). The objectives of monitoring are to 1) detect changes in population numbers, 2) detect changes in reproductive success and 3) identify anthropogenic or environmental factors that might affect population status and trends. The monitoring objectives and protocol are described in detail in Hester et al. (draft report). The information presented here is a summary of the data collected during the 2005 breeding and molting seasons, March- July. Summary data collected as part of a region-wide survey effort including adjacent areas (San Francisco Bay, San Mateo County and Sonoma County) where NPS surveys were conducted in 2005 in conjunction with other agencies and organizations are also presented. Methods Study Area The Point Reyes peninsula extends from Tomales Bay (Lat. 38° 30’N) south to Bolinas Lagoon (Lat.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You for Choosing Smart Destinations. Remember to Print Your
    Attraction Guide (866) 628-9028 Thank you for choosing Smart Destinations. IMPORTANT: This packet contains your printable admission passes. Each person for whom you have purchased a pass will have a single unique SCANNABLE CODE. The code is your Go San Francisco Card. This code is REQUIRED for admission to each attraction. You MUST print it and have it with you. Remember to RETAIN it after each scan for use at the next attraction. How to use your GO San Francisco Card (with scannable code): You must present your Go San Francisco Card for admission at every attraction you visit. The FIRST time you use your Go San Francisco Card at an attraction, your card will be ACTIVATED. It is important to remember that your Go San Francisco Card is valid for the number of calendar days purchased (not 24-hour periods) and can be used for entry until 5:30 pm on each of the valid days. The included attraction guide contains valuable information about how to gain entry to each of the attractions, and also, how to use your pass to access the special discounts on shopping and dining. Keep an eye out for special icons: Each attraction and special o!er has a color-coded and numbered locator, which will help you locate it on the map provided. Included Reservations A colored circle on the maps and next to the name indicates the type 1 Attraction required of attraction it is and the number corresponds to the maps. The colored squares indicate special conditions for visiting the attraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit of Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline
    Circuit of Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline 1. Summary of Trail: This hiking circuit of Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline features railroad and WWII history, sandy beaches, rocky ridge lines, native grasslands with wildflowers and stunning vistas overlooking San Francisco and San Pablo Bays: San Francisco, Oakland, Angel and Brooks Islands and Mounts Tamalpais, St. Helena and Diablo. 2. Modes of Transportation: hiking 3. Length: 5.1 miles. Allow up to three hours. 4. Location: Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline in Richmond. 5. Level of Intensity: moderate 6. Overall Elevation Gain: Total elevation gain is about 700 feet spread over five short, steep ascents. Downhill stretches are moderate except for one short, steep descent. 7. Trail Features: This hike is unusually scenic and rich in both cultural and natural history. The Potrero Hills forming the backbone of Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline were an island until 1900 when the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad built a causeway for trains bringing freight and passengers from Chicago to Ferry Point for transshipment to San Francisco. These hills represent one of the few remaining sites in the East Bay with native coastal prairie habitat containing perennial bunch grasses. The Miller/Knox lagoon picnic area offers good bird watching opportunities. This hike includes an overlook of Point Potrero with structures remaining from Shipyard 3, which was one of Richmond’s four Kaiser Permanente shipyards responsible for building 747 ships during WWII -- more that any other facility in the nation. Possible adjuncts to this hike include visiting the Golden State Model Railroad Museum, which is open noon to 5 PM Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday with trains operating only on Sunday (confirm at http://gsmrm.org/ or telephone 234- 4884).
    [Show full text]
  • Ferry Terminal San Francisco Transit Information
    Sidney Walton Park Pier 3 TransitJ A C K S O N S T Stops Paradas del tránsito 公車站地圖 Pier 1 To Fisherman’s Wharf Golden Gateway Center Tiburon Transit WASHINGTON ST 200 Vallejo SAN FRANCISCO B A T T E R Y S T Information Gate B Vallejo BAY 5 Maritime Sue Bierman - Plaza Park ® Larkspur/Sausalito 1 F Y E R R Ferry Terminal M Ferry Building I F Gates C L AY S T N San Francisco D R U M M S T C&D To Chinatown Three Four U One Two Embarcadero Embarcadero Embarcadero Embarcadero Center Center T Map Key Center Center Justin 1•41•82X 41•82X F E You Are Here Herman Alameda/Oakland Plaza 1000-Foot (305m) Radius F R O N T S T Thruway D A V I S S T W (ve minute walk) S A C R A M E N T O S T Alameda Harbor Bay BART Train A Bus (Motor Coach, Trolley Coach) Owl Owl L 6•21•31•L •N Gate E Cable Car 2 K Hyatt South San Francisco Ferry California Regency F 41•82X One Market Historic Streetcar C A L I F O R N I A S T Plaza THE EMBARCADERO Thruway Metro Light Rail A1 14•14X•NOwl Amtrak Major Transit Terminal 31AX•31BX•38BX F Ofce B1 Market Street Transit Stop 1AX•1BX•38AX Railway Museum Underground Station Pier 14 14•14L•14X•30X•41•82X Hotel Vitale A1 Station Entrance/Exit A2 2•4•8•18•24 B2 14 Station Elevator Spear P I N E S T Tower Ferry Tickets A3 Embarcadero Station Transit Information 9•9L Inside Embarcadero Station: S T E U A R T S T B3 EM, FE, TT-B SFO & East Bay Stations 14•14X Transit Lines One 14L Front Metro J•K•L•M•N•T Rincon Center San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni) Bldg Cable Car Historic Streetcar California Street F Market and Wharves B
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Survey Report for the San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate, Contra Costa County, California
    Appendix D CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT Cultural Resources Survey Report for the San Francisco Bay Trail at Point Molate, Contra Costa County, California Prepared on Behalf of: Prepared By: East Bay Regional Park District NCE 2950 Peralta Oaks Court, P.O. Box 1760 P.O. Box 5381 Zephyr Cove, NV 89448 Oakland, CA 94605 NCE Project Number: 567.04.55 March 2018 Jeremy Hall With Contributions From: Cultural Resources Specialist Chad Moffett and Tim Smith NCE Architectural Historians Mead & Hunt ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY In 2009, the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) entered into an agreement for the donation of an easement for the San Francisco Bay Trail (Bay Trail) along the shoreline of their southernmost property on the San Pablo Peninsula at Point Molate. In 2013-14, the EBRPD hired NCE to conduct an alignment study for a Class I bike path and as a result, recorded the trail easement. Recently, the Bay Area Toll Authority (BATA) approved the installation of a bike and pedestrian path on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge to Marine Street, near Point Richmond, which would connect to the EBRPD’s easement at Stenmark Drive. The combined projects will connect trail users from both Richmond and Marin County to the San Pablo Peninsula. The proposed Bay Trail at Point Molate will be approximately 2.5 miles and extend north along the shoreline, through Chevron’s property, to the Point Molate Beach Park and Navel Fuel Depot property, owned and managed by the City of Richmond, giving the public access to the shoreline and the ability to connect to the Park via foot or bicycle.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHMOND FERRY TERMINAL PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
    RICHMOND FERRY TERMINAL PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft Prepared for WETA San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority Pier 9, Suite 111 The Embarcadero San Francisco, CA 94111 Prepared by Atkins 322 Pine Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 May 2014 Draft Contents May 2014 Contents SECTION 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 I. Purpose of this Document........................................................................................ 1 II. Purpose and Need of the Project ............................................................................ 1 III. Project Background ................................................................................................... 3 IV. Scope of this Document ........................................................................................... 4 V. Impact Terminology .................................................................................................. 7 VI. Organization of this Document ............................................................................... 8 VII. Summary of Environmental Impacts ...................................................................... 8 SECTION 2. Project Description ............................................................................................ 17 I. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 17 II. Project
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Ferry Dock Study Waterfront A's Stadium
    “The Voice of the Waterfront” June 2019 Vol.20, No.6 Celebrate Summer Sailstice Berkeley Ferry Dock Study Event Brings Sailing to the Masses WETA Takes Tentative Steps Boating Without the Hassle Waterfront A’s Stadium? Clubs Offer Affordable Boat Access Oakland Cargo Industry Opposes COMPLETE FERRY SCHEDULES FOR ALL SF LINES PHOTO CREDIT Sonoma Land Trust Great food to celebrate life in the City! Enjoy a ten minute walk from the Ferry Building or a short hop on the F-Line Crab House at Pier 39 Voted “Best Crab in San Francisco” Sizzling Skillet-roasted Mussels, Shrimp & Crab Romantic Cozy Fireplace Stunning Golden Gate Bridge View Open Daily 11:30 am - 10 pm 2nd Floor, West Side of Pier 39 Validated Parking crabhouse39.com 415.434.2722 Franciscan Crab Restaurant Open Daily 11:30 am - 11 pm Pier 43 1/2 Validated Parking Whole Roasted Dungeness Crab Breathtaking Views 415.362.7733 Bay Side of Historic Fisherman’s Wharf franciscancrabrestaurant.com THE ORIGINAL SAN FRANCISCO BAY CRUISE PIER 43 1/2 FISHERMAN’S WHARF REDANDWHITE.COM (415) 673-2900 NIGHT TOUR Book Your Tour Today! WWW.BIGBUS.COM www.baycrossings.com June 2019 3 columns features 07 WHO’S ON DECK? 12 COVER STORY Rich Garnett Summer Sailstice Returns 15 by Matt Larson to the Bay to Celebrate the Wide World of Sailing by Joel Williams guides 14 BAYKEEPER Ding, Dong. The Wicked 16 GREEN PAGES 20 BAY AREA FERRY SCHEDULES Delta ‘Fix’ Is Dead. Port of Oakland Adopts Be on time for last call by Sejal Choksi-Chugh Truck Management Plan AROUND THE BAY by Bill Picture 22 To see, be, do,
    [Show full text]