DOCSLIB.ORG

Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy Background Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy Background Report Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment April 2000 Published by: Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania. Citation: Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania 2000. Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy: Background Report. Available from: Executive Officer, Marine and Marine Industries Council Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment 5th Floor, Marine Board Building 1 Franklin Wharf Hobart, Tasmania 7000 Ph: 03 6233 3470 Acknowledgements Prepared by Dr Karen Edyvane with advice and comments from Peter Bosworth and other members of the DPIWE Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy Project Team (Sally Chambers, Alex Schaap, Doug Nicol, Fionna Bourne and Dennis Witt) and also Professor Colin Buxton and Dr. Graham Edgar and other members of the Marine and Marine Industries Council. The report was edited by Vivienne Mawson with final production by Sylvia Outridge. Administrative support was also provided by Sam Parkinson and Mark Johnson. Research and collection of information presented in this report was assisted with funding provided by Environment Australia under the Marine Protected Areas Program. Page ii Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy: Background Report © 2000 Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Commonwealth Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Inquiries should be directed to the General Manager, Resource Management and Conservation, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44A, Hobart TAS 7001. ISBN No: 0 7246 21148 DISCLAIMER Any representation, statement opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith but on the basis that the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania, its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to above. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not reflect those of the Commonwealth Government, the Commonwealth Minister for Environment and Heritage or the Commonwealth Director of National Parks and Wildlife. PREFACE This Background Report has been prepared by the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment in consultation with the Marine and Marine Industries Council to provide background material for the development of a Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy. The report describes the marine ecosystems and biodiversity and the marine management systems in Tasmania and then outlines the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas which has been endorsed by all States and Territories as well as the Commonwealth. The fundamental concept of a comprehensive, adequate and representative system of Marine Protected Areas is explored before the status of marine conservation in Tasmania is described. The latter part of the report then identifies possible goals, outcomes and principles for a Representative Marine Protected Areas System in Tasmania, proposed guidelines for identifying and selecting a system and how it would be established and managed. Reference throughout the report is made where relevant to other State, Territory, national and international approaches and experiences. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS & BIODIVERSITY OF TASMANIA .............. 1 1.1 EVOLUTION OF TASMANIA’S MARINE ECOSYSTEMS ........................................................... 1 1.2 PHYSICAL SETTING ............................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Climate ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Bathymetry (water depth) ............................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 Ocean Currents ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2.4 Wave Energy ............................................................................................................... 4 1.2.5 Productivity ................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 MARINE BIODIVERSITY ...................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Flora........................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Invertebrates ............................................................................................................... 7 1.3.3 Fish ........................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.4 Reptiles ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.5 Seabirds .................................................................................................................... 11 1.3.6 Marine Mammals ...................................................................................................... 11 1.4 MARINE ECOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 13 1.4.1 Estuaries, Inlets and Wetlands ................................................................................... 13 1.4.2 Soft Sediments ........................................................................................................... 14 1.4.3 Reefs ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.4 Offshore Islands ........................................................................................................ 16 1.4.5 Offshore Ecosystems ................................................................................................. 16 1.5 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS OF TASMANIA ............................................................................... 17 1.5.1 Classifying Marine Ecosystems — Bioregionalisation ................................................ 19 1.5.2 Province or Large Marine Ecosystems ....................................................................... 20 1.5.3 Bioregion or Ecosystem-Level Regionalisation .......................................................... 23 CHAPTER 2 MARINE MANAGEMENT IN TASMANIA ....................................... 27 2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 27 2.2 JURISDICTION ................................................................................................................... 27 2.3 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ..................................................................................... 28 2.3.1 Fisheries and Aquaculture ......................................................................................... 28 2.3.2 Marine Pollution ....................................................................................................... 29 2.3.3 Shipping and Navigation ........................................................................................... 29 2.3.4 Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................................... 30 2.3.5 Coastal Management................................................................................................. 30 2.3.6 Conservation ............................................................................................................. 30 2.4 RELEVANT PLANNING SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 32 2.4.1 Resource Management and Planning System ............................................................. 32 2.4.2 Resource Planning and Development Commission (RPDC) ........................................ 33 Page vi Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy: Background Report CHAPTER 3 THE NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM OF MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ........................................................................ 36 3.1 WHY MARINE PROTECTED AREAS? .................................................................................... 36 3.2 THE NATIONAL, REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM OF MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (NRSMPA) ..... 37 3.2.1 National Guidelines for Establishing the NRSMPA .................................................... 38 3.2.2 Primary Goal of the NRSMPA ................................................................................... 39 3.2.3 Defining Marine Protected Areas .............................................................................. 39 3.2.4 Key Characteristics ................................................................................................... 40 3.2.5 A comprehensive adequate and representative (CAR) system of Marine Protected Areas ... 41 3.3 KEY STEPS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN NRSMPA ........................................................ 41 3.4 IUCN PROTECTED AREA CATEGORIES .............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Lord Howe Island, a Riddle of the Pacific, Part III

    Lord Howe Island, a Riddle of the Pacific, Part III

    Lord Howe Island, A Riddle of the Pacific, Part III S. J. PARAMONOV1 IN THIS FINAL PART (for parts I and II see During two visits to the island, in 1954 and Pacif.Sci.12 (1) :82- 91, 14 (1 ): 75-85 ) the 1955, the author failed to find the insect. An author is dealing mainly with a review of the official enquiry was made recently to the Ad­ insects and with general conclusions. mini stration staff of the island, and the author received a letter from the Superintendent of INSECTA the Island, Mr. H. Ward, on Nov. 3, 1961, in which he states : "A number of the old inhabi­ Our knowledge of the insects of Lord Howe tants have been questioned and all have advised Island is only preliminary and incomplete. Some that it is at least 30 years and possibly 40 groups, for example butterflies and beetles, are years since this insect has .been seen on the more or less sufficiently studied, other groups Island. A member of the staff, aged 33 years, very poorly. has never seen or heard of the insect, nor has Descriptions of new endemic species and any pupil of the local School." records of the insects of the island are dis­ The only possibility is that the insect may persed in many articles, and a summary of our still exist in one of the biggest banyan trees knowledge in this regard is lacking. However, on the slope of Mr, Gower, on the lagoon side. a high endemism of the fauna is evident. Al­ The area is well isolated from the settlement though the degree of endemi sm is only at the where the rat concentration was probably the specific, or at most the generic level, the con­ greatest, and may have survived in crevices of nection with other faunas is very significant.
  • Mortality Rate Trends of Australian Fur Seal Pups, Arctocephalus Pusillus

    Mortality Rate Trends of Australian Fur Seal Pups, Arctocephalus Pusillus

    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2018 Mortality rate trends of Australian fur seal pups, Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus, and possible factors affecting pup mortality in the Bass Strait of Australia Theresa Waters SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Biology Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Waters, Theresa, "Mortality rate trends of Australian fur seal pups, Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus, and possible factors affecting pup mortality in the Bass Strait of Australia" (2018). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2950. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2950 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mortality rate trends of Australian fur seal pups, Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus, and possible factors affecting pup mortality in the Bass Strait of Australia © Duncan Sutherland By Theresa Waters Project Advisor: Rebecca McIntosh, Ph.D. Phillip Island Nature Parks Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia Academic Director: Tony Cummings Home Institution: Vassar College Major: Biology Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Australia: Rainforest, Reef, and Cultural Ecology, SIT Study Abroad, Fall 2018 ISP Ethics Review (Note: Each AD must complete, sign, and submit this form for every student’s ISP.) The ISP paper by Theresa Waters (student) does/does not* conform to the Human Subjects Review approval from the Local Review Board, the ethical standards of the local community, and the ethical and academic standards outlined in the SIT student and faculty handbooks.
  • Sustainable Murchison 2040 Plan

    Sustainable Murchison 2040 Plan

    Sustainable Murchison 2040 Community Plan Regional Framework Plan Prepared for Waratah-Wynyard Council, Circular Head Council, West Coast Council, King Island Council and Burnie City Council Date 21 November 2016 Geografi a Geografia Pty Ltd • Demography • Economics • Spatial Planning +613 9329 9004 | [email protected] | www.geografia.com.au Supported by the Tasmanian Government Geografia Pty Ltd • Demography • Economics • Spatial Planning +613 9329 9004 | [email protected] | www.geografia.com.au 571 Queensberry Street North Melbourne VIC 3051 ABN: 33 600 046 213 Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Geografia Pty Ltd for the councils of Waratah-Wynyard, Circular Head, West Coast, and King Island, and is intended for their use. It should be read in conjunction with the Community Engagement Report, the Regional Resource Analysis and Community Plan. While every effort is made to provide accurate and complete information, Geografia does not warrant or represent that the information contained is free from errors or omissions and accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage, cost or expense (whether direct or indirect) incurred as a result of a person taking action in respect to any representation, statement, or advice referred to in this report. Executive Summary The Sustainable Murchison Community Plan belongs to the people of Murchison, so that they may plan and implement for a sustainable future. Through one voice and the cooperative action of the community, business and government, Murchison can be a place where aspirations are realised. This plan is the culmination of extensive community and stakeholder consultation, research and analysis. It sets out the community vision, principles and strategic objectives for Murchison 2040.
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
  • Macquarie Harbour

    Macquarie Harbour

    Tasmanian West Coast Foray Part 1 Macquarie Harbour 100nm. Add another 22 when your Gale force winds, driving rain, cold temperatures, a small starting point is at Three Hummock Island. So one or even two stops can sprinkling of sunny days, and all this in late summer… Any be made along the way. takers for a foray down the West Coast of Tasmania? This is We studied two anchorage guides where CHRISTINE DANGER is sailing us over two issues. which are our bibles: Cruising Tasmania by J Brettingham-Moore, and Tasmanian Anchorage Guide published by the Royal Yacht Club of oming down the west coast, Our expedition started from So over two articles, we will share Tasmania. We talked to Tasmanian even during the so-called Melbourne in late February. We with you the sites we visited and friends who know the area well and C best season, is not for the sailed west to Apollo Bay, then south impressions we formed. The first picked the brains of cray fishermen to faint hearted. It is committal, it is to King Island and the Hunter Group, focuses on Macquarie Harbour, the find out about anchorages they use The coast is quite scenic: a mix of TOP: Strahan with its old buildings challenging, but when it all goes and there we waited for the right second on Port Davey. along the coast. There is a wealth of scrub, sand dunes, rocky outcrops … a welcome sight after many smoothly on a well-equipped boat, conditions to start our descent. It did knowledge out there and people are hours at sea.
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col

    3966 Tour Op 4Col

    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
  • Deal Island an Historical Overview

    Deal Island an Historical Overview

    Introduction. In June 1840 the Port Officer of Hobart Captain W. Moriarty wrote to the Governor of Van Diemen’s Land, Sir John Franklin suggesting that lighthouses should be erected in Bass Strait. On February 3rd. 1841 Sir John Franklin wrote to Sir George Gipps, Governor of New South Wales seeking his co-operation. Government House, Van Diemen’s Land. 3rd. February 1841 My Dear Sir George. ………………….This matter has occupied much of my attention since my arrival in the Colony, and recent ocurances in Bass Strait have given increased importance to the subject, within the four years of my residence here, two large barques have been entirely wrecked there, a third stranded a brig lost with all her crew, besides two or three colonial schooners, whose passengers and crew shared the same fate, not to mention the recent loss of the Clonmell steamer, the prevalence of strong winds, the uncertainty of either the set or force of the currents, the number of small rocks, islets and shoals, which though they appear on the chart, have but been imperfectly surveyed, combine to render Bass Strait under any circumstances an anxious passage for seamen to enter. The Legislative Council, Votes and Proceedings between 1841 – 42 had much correspondence on the viability of erecting lighthouses in Bass Strait including Deal Island. In 1846 construction of the lightstation began on Deal Island with the lighthouse completed in February 1848. The first keeper William Baudinet, his wife and seven children arriving on the island in March 1848. From 1816 to 1961 about 18 recorded shipwrecks have occurred in the vicinity of Deal Island, with the Bulli (1877) and the Karitane (1921) the most well known of these shipwrecks.
  • The Tectonic History of the Dial Range Area, Tasmania

    The Tectonic History of the Dial Range Area, Tasmania

    THE TECTONIC =snit! of tin DIAL RANO AREA, TASMANIA. ILL. 111=8 13.6e.(Nons.) Submitted in fulfilsient of the rovirsinents for the Degree of DOCTOR of PKILOSOPHT. University of Tasmania, Hobart. 911212.tts..a63. t, +I 0V t , Mon Mt Plate 1 TABLE OV COUXEN:20 page Ma— 1- 5 5. 28 29. 46 Stratigraphy or the Precambrian System 47- 73 2, Cambrian 74.133 3 0 ft Ordovician 134-164 4, " Devonian 165-118b Secorld Voluige pnemprrc Gytoldx,y 5, fitructures in post-Middle Devonian rocks 179-100 6. 0 " Ordovician rocks 1C9.224 " 7. Cambrinn • " 225'..n53. G. " the Roclw Cape Group 252-264 9. " Mverstone trotamorphics P65.305 10. " " Forth llott.-Lors7E•zie 306.320 IFaCrs 11. he Precambrian Orogenies 321-334 12. The Tyennan Orogeny 335-349 13. The Tanerabberan °meow • • 350-360 zit'Nisiikaggei 369-374 &Laza; 375-386 Apro-44rXcils TABLIt OF Finn; Following =LAI* ,tir0 Vop Introduction 1. Locality map... ..... ............... 37 2, Map of towgrap;ic . 3. Bedrock map of the Dial Range area... Maminz.Z 4. Columnar sections of the Cat eena Subgroup 81 5. Isopach map of the Barrington Chart 97 6 General Geological map of the BE:saran Aegabreccia. .......... 111 chavtfir 7:. Columnar sections of the Dial Conglomerate .. 135 S Isopach nap of the Duman Conglomerate............. 139 9. Structures in the Dial Conglomerate 140 10. Variations in pebble composition of the Duncan Conglomerate. ... 148 11. Palaeogeographic reconstructions for the Dial Conglomerate.... 160 chapter 4 12.Plan of the Eugenana Quarries.. ......,.. ..... 165 13.Map of the face of Balletts Quarry, ftgenana.....
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature

    Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature

    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.
  • Nowhere Else on Earth

    Nowhere Else on Earth

    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
  • Geochemistry of Darwin Glass and Target Rocks from Darwin Crater, Tasmania, Australia

    Geochemistry of Darwin Glass and Target Rocks from Darwin Crater, Tasmania, Australia

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, Nr 3, 479–496 (2008) AUTHOR’S Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org PROOF Geochemistry of Darwin glass and target rocks from Darwin crater, Tasmania, Australia Kieren T. HOWARD School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia Present address: Impacts and Astromaterials Research Centre, Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 1 March 2007; revision accepted 25 July 2007) Abstract–Darwin glass formed about 800,000 years ago in western Tasmania, Australia. Target rocks at Darwin crater are quartzites and slates (Siluro-Devonian, Eldon Group). Analyses show 2 groups of glass, Average group 1 is composed of: SiO2 (85%), Al2O3 (7.3%), TiO2 (0.05%), FeO (2.2%), MgO (0.9%), and K2O (1.8%). Group 2 has lower average SiO2 (81.1%) and higher average Al2O3 (8.2%). Group 2 is enriched in FeO (+1.5%), MgO (+1.3%) and Ni, Co, and Cr. Average Ni (416 ppm), Co (31 ppm), and Cr (162 ppm) in group 2 are beyond the range of sedimentary rocks. Glass and target rocks have concordant REE patterns (La/Lu = 5.9–10; Eu/Eu* = 0.55–0.65) and overlapping trace element abundances. 87Sr/86Sr ratios for the glasses (0.80778–0.81605) fall in the range (0.76481–1.1212) defined by the rock samples. ε-Nd results range from −13.57 to −15.86. Nd model ages range from 1.2–1.9 Ga (CHUR) and the glasses (1.2–1.5 Ga) fall within the range defined by the target samples.
  • Tasmanian Aborigines in the Furneaux Group in the Nine Teenth Century—Population and Land

    Tasmanian Aborigines in the Furneaux Group in the Nine Teenth Century—Population and Land

    ‘I hope you will be my frend’: Tasmanian Aborigines in the Furneaux Group in the nine­ teenth century—population and land tenure Irynej Skira Abstract This paper traces the history of settlement of the islands of the Furneaux Group in Bass Strait and the effects of government regulation on the long term settlements of Tasma­ nian Aboriginal people from the 1850s to the early 1900s. Throughout the nineteenth century the Aboriginal population grew slowly eventually constituting approximately 40 percent of the total population of the Furneaux Group. From the 1860s outsiders used the existing land title system to obtain possession of the islands. Aborigines tried to establish tenure through the same system, but could not compete because they lacked capital, and were disadvantaged by isolation in their communication with gov­ ernment. Further, the islands' use for grazing excluded Aborigines who rarely had large herds of stock and were generally not agriculturalists. The majority of Aborigines were forced to settle on Cape Barren Island, where they built homes on a reserve set aside for them. European expansion of settlement on Flinders Island finally completed the disen­ franchisement of Aboriginal people by making the Cape Barren Island enclave depend­ ent on the government. Introduction In December 1869 Thomas Mansell, an Aboriginal, applied to lease a small island. He petitioned the Surveyor-General, T hope you will be my Frend...I am one of old hands Her, and haf Cast and have large family and no hum'.1 Unfortunately, he could not raise £1 as down payment. Mansell's was one of the many attempts by Aboriginal people in the Furneaux Group to obtain valid leasehold or freehold and recognition of their long term occupation.