DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report on Competition Policy Developments in the Russian Federation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report on Competition Policy Developments in the Russian Federation Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/AR(2019)51 Unclassified English - Or. English 9 May 2019 Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs COMPETITION COMMITTEE Annual Report on Competition Policy Developments in the Russian Federation -- 2018 -- 5-7 June 2019 This report is submitted by the Russian Federation to the Competition Committee FOR INFORMATION at its forthcoming meeting to be held on 5-7 June 2019. JT03447207 This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 │ DAF/COMP/AR(2019)51 Table of contents Russian Federation ................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Part 1. Changes to competition laws and policies, proposed or adopted ...................................... 4 1.1. Summary of new legal provisions of competition law and related legislation ............................. 4 1.1.1. The Resolution of the President of the Russian Federation and National Competition Development Plan ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1.2. Antimonopoly compliance ..................................................................................................... 6 1.1.3. The fifth antimonopoly package ............................................................................................. 7 1.1.4. Legislation in the field of procurement ................................................................................ 10 1.1.5. Draft Law on Antimonopoly Control Procedure for the Creation of State and Municipal Unitary Enterprises ......................................................................................................................... 11 1.1.6. Draft Law on the State Regulation of Prices (Tariffs) ......................................................... 11 1.2. Other regulatory measures, including methodological recommendations (administrative provisions, etc.) .................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.1. Housing sector ...................................................................................................................... 12 1.2.2. Pharmaceutical market ......................................................................................................... 14 1.2.3. Guidelines of the FAS Russia Presidium ............................................................................. 14 1.3. Government proposals for new legislation ................................................................................. 15 2. Part 2. Enforcement of competition law and policy ..................................................................... 16 2.1. 2.1. Actions against agreements and concerted actions .............................................................. 17 2.1.1. 2.1.1. Summary of activities of competition authorities and courts ..................................... 17 2.1.2. Description of significant cases ............................................................................................ 17 2.2. Actions against abuses of dominant positions ............................................................................ 20 2.2.1. Summary of activities of competition authorities and courts ............................................... 20 2.2.2. Description of significant cases ............................................................................................ 20 2.3. Mergers and acquisitions ............................................................................................................ 22 2.3.1. Summary of activities ........................................................................................................... 22 2.3.2. Description of significant cases ............................................................................................ 23 2.4. Actions against unfair competition ............................................................................................. 26 2.4.1. Summary of activities of competition authorities and courts ............................................... 26 2.4.2. Description of significant cases ............................................................................................ 27 2.5. Actions against public authorities’ anticompetitive conduct ...................................................... 29 2.5.1. Summary of activities of competition authorities and courts ............................................... 29 2.5.2. Description of significant cases ............................................................................................ 30 2.6. Summary of courts’ action .......................................................................................................... 33 2.6.1. Summary of activities of competition authorities and courts ............................................... 33 3. Part 3. Conducted market studies .................................................................................................. 35 3.1. Market studies of Bayer/Monsanto deal ..................................................................................... 36 3.2. Market studies of MegaFon/Mail.Ru.Group deal ....................................................................... 37 3.3. International comparative study on medicine prices ................................................................... 38 4. Part 4. International cooperation ................................................................................................... 38 4.1. Interaction with international organizations ............................................................................... 38 4.2. Bilateral and multilateral cooperation with Competition Authorities ......................................... 41 ANNUAL REPORT ON COMPETITION POLICY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Unclassified DAF/COMP/AR(2019)51 │ 3 4.3. Development of competition legislation and its enforcement at regional and multinational level .................................................................................................................................................... 42 4.3.1. Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) ....................................................................... 42 4.3.2. The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) .............................................................................. 43 4.3.3. BRICS .................................................................................................................................. 46 5. Part 5. Competition advocacy ........................................................................................................ 47 5.1. Meetings of the FAS Russia’s executives with the Heads of subjects of Russia ........................ 48 5.2. Exchange Committee under the FAS Russia .............................................................................. 48 5.3. Measures for the advocacy of competition on electric power markets ....................................... 50 5.3.1. Method of reference costs for calculating sales premium of guaranteeing suppliers ........... 50 5.4. Measures for the advocacy of competition on advertising markets and preventing unfair competition ........................................................................................................................................ 50 5.4.1. Recommendations on the compliance with the law on advertising non-prescription medicines ........................................................................................................................................ 50 5.4.2. Development of antimonopoly practice for the protection of rights holders’ rights in the organization and running of international sports events................................................................. 52 5.5. Measures for the advocacy of competition on financial markets ................................................ 54 5.5.1. Changes in the formation of the Central Depository Service User Committee .................... 54 5.5.2. Development of the institution of joint letters of regulators aimed at preventing competition restriction .................................................................................................................... 55 5.5.3. Extending the areas of cooperation between the FAS Russia and the Bank of Russia ........ 56 5.6. Policy on information openness .................................................................................................. 57 5.6.1. Work with profile printed and electronic international publications .................................... 57 5.6.2. Participation in research projects and educational events .................................................... 58 5.6.3. Winning the Competition Advocacy Contest of the World Bank and the International Competition Network ..................................................................................................................... 60 5.7. Presidium of the FAS Russia approved recommendations on applying waivers of confidentiality when considering merger control transactions .......................................................... 60 6. Part 6. Resources overall ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unipro Group Consolidated Financial Statements
    UNIPRO GROUP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 31 DECEMBER 2018 Contents INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ......................................................................................... 1 Consolidated Statement of comprehensive Income ................................................................................ 2 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ........................................................................................ 3 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows .................................................................................................. 4 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 1. The Group and its operations ..................................................................................................... 5 Note 2. Principles of preparation and summary of significant accounting policies ................................. 7 Note 3. Critical accounting estimates and assumptions ........................................................................ 19 Note 4. Application of new and revised standards and clarifications .................................................... 20 Note 5. Related Parties ......................................................................................................................... 25 Note 6. Acquisitions and disposals .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report ‘06 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT ‘06 CONTENTS MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS ————————————————————————————— 4 MISSION AND STRATEGY ———————————————————————————————— 7 COMPANY OVERVIEW ————————————————————————————————— 13 ² GENERAL INFORMATION 13 ² GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION 14 ² CALENDAR OF KEY 2006 EVENTS 15 ² REORGANIZATION 16 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE —————————————————————————————— 21 ² PRINCIPLES AND DOCUMENTS 21 ² MANAGEMENT BODIES OF THE COMPANY 22 ² CONTROL BODIES 39 ² AUDITOR 40 ² ASSOCIATED AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES 40 ² INTERESTED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 41 SECURITIES AND EQUITY ——————————————————————————————— 43 ² CHARTER CAPITAL STRUCTURE 43 ² STOCK MARKET 44 ² DIVIDEND HISTORY 48 ² REGISTRAR 49 OPERATING ACTIVITIES. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ——————————————— 51 ² GENERATING FACILITIES 51 ² FUEL SUPPLY 52 ² ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION 56 ² HEAT PRODUCTION 59 ² BASIC PRODUCTION ASSETS REPAIR 59 ² INCIDENT AND INJURY RATES. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY 60 ² ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 61 ELECTRICITY AND HEAT MARKETS ——————————————————————————— 65 ² COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT. OVERVIEW OF KEY MARKETS 65 ² ELECTRICITY AND HEAT SALES 67 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW ————————————————————————————————— 73 ² FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 73 ² REVENUES AND EXPENSES BREAKDOWN 81 INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES ———————————————————————————————— 83 ² INVESTMENT STRATEGY 83 ² INVESTMENT PROGRAM 84 ² INVESTMENT PROGRAM FINANCING SOURCES 86 ² DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS 87 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT —————————————————————— 89 PERSONNEL AND SOCIAL POLICY. SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP ———————————————— 91 INFORMATION FOR INVESTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS ——————————————————
    [Show full text]
  • Methodical Approach to Assessing the Effectiveness of the Management System of Thermal Power Plants in Russia
    E3S Web of Conferences 124, 04003 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912404003 SES-2019 Methodical approach to assessing the effectiveness of the management system of thermal power plants in Russia P. I. Okley1, V. K. Lozenko1 and R. I. Inamov1,* 1 National Research University "Moscow Power Engineering Institute", Moscow, Russia Abstract. Physical deterioration of thermal power plants based on hydrocarbon fuels leads to technological violations (TV) in their work. Low rates of renewal of thermal generation predetermines the further exploitation of old capacities. In this regard, the activity of the management of energy holdings (EH) is more focused on maintaining the equipment in working condition. The methods, approaches and tools underlying decision-making by the management of energy holding companies are different, respectively, the results of the functioning of the organized management systems (MS) of each company are also different. To assess the effectiveness of the management system it is proposed to use such a generalized indicator as the number of technological violations per year per 1 GW of installed capacity. 1 Introduction capacity — for example, the balance of the largest holdings includes both traditional thermal power plants The electric power industry is one of the key areas of and nuclear and hydro generation. To understand the Russia's development, the country's economy and social scale of management activities it is interesting to find out position of all citizens depend on it. This industry is he general values of the installed capacity belonging to represented by 11 largest holding companies, which each holding in addition to data on production volumes produce about 85% of electricity (in 2018 - 921.8 billion and the technological structure of the generating kW*h) of the total annual production (1076.2 billion complex of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation State Actors of Protection
    European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Russian Federation State Actors of Protection March 2017 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Russian Federation State Actors of Protection March 2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Free phone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Print ISBN 978-92-9494-372-9 doi: 10.2847/502403 BZ-04-17-273-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9494-373-6 doi: 10.2847/265043 BZ-04-17-273-EN-C © European Asylum Support Office 2017 Cover photo credit: JessAerons – Istockphoto.com Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO Country of Origin Report: Russian Federation – State Actors of Protection — 3 Acknowledgments EASO would like to acknowledge the following national COI units and asylum and migration departments as the co-authors of this report: Belgium, Cedoca (Center for Documentation and Research), Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons Poland, Country of Origin Information Unit, Department for Refugee Procedures, Office for Foreigners Sweden, Lifos, Centre for Country of Origin Information and Analysis, Swedish Migration Agency Norway, Landinfo, Country of
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation Interim Opinion on Constitutional
    Strasbourg, 23 March 2021 CDL-AD(2021)005 Opinion No. 992/2020 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) RUSSIAN FEDERATION INTERIM OPINION ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND THE PROCEDURE FOR THEIR ADOPTION Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 126th Plenary Session (online, 19-20 March 2021) on the basis of comments by Mr Nicos ALIVIZATOS (Member, Greece) Ms Claire BAZY MALAURIE (Member, France) Ms Veronika BÍLKOVÁ (Member, Czech Republic) Mr Iain CAMERON (Member, Sweden) Ms Monika HERMANNS (Substitute Member, Germany) Mr Martin KUIJER (Substitute Member, Netherlands) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2021)005 - 2 - Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 II. Scope of the present opinion .......................................................................................... 4 III. Chronology of the preparation and adoption of the constitutional amendments ............. 4 IV. Analysis of the procedure for the Adoption of the Constitutional Amendments .............. 6 A. Speed of preparation of the amendments - consultations ........................................... 6 B. Competence of the Constitutional Court ..................................................................... 7 C. Competence of the Constitutional Assembly .............................................................. 7 D. Ad hoc procedure .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS LETTER Weekly
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody March 5, 2020 Issue No. 2020/08 Company News Polyus to become Moscow Exchange’s blue chip instead of Severstal On February 28, 2020 it was reported that the Moscow Exchange planned to include the ordinary shares of Russian gold producer Polyus in its Blue Chip index instead of the shares of steelmaker Severstal on March 20. The depository receipts of multi-industry holding En+ Group will be replaced with its shares, and the shares together with the depository receipts of payment system operator Qiwi will be considered to be added to the MOEX Russia Index and the RTS Index. Other changes to the indices include addition of depository receipts of real estate developer Etalon Group and exclusion of Seligdar from the Broad Market Index, inclusion of ordinary shares of fertilizer producer Acron and Pharmacy Chain 36.6 in the SMID Index, and exclusion of ordinary shares of oil company RussNeft and oil and gas pipe producer TMK from the Oil and Gas Index. The committee also recommended that the Moscow Exchange launch a new sectorial index for the Russian real estate industry. Mail.ru’s board of directors approves listing on Moscow Exchange On March 2, 2020 the board of directors of Russian Internet company Mail.ru Group approved a listing of global depositary receipts (GDRs) on the Moscow Exchange. The plan is for Mail.ru Group’s GDRs to begin trading in Moscow by July. There will not be any secondary issuance accompanying the listing. Russian antitrust clears Fortum to buy stake in Uniper On March 2, 2020 it was announced that Russia’s Federal Antimonopoly Service cleared Finland’s Fortum to acquire a 20.5% stake in Germany’s Uniper.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Inter RAO Group Today | 11
    10 | PJSC Inter RAO | 2016 Annual Report 3. INTER RAO GROUP TODAY The Group operates in the following segments: A leading electricity export and import operator in Rus- — Electricity and heat generation sia. The Inter RAO Group’s supply geography comprises — Electricity supply and heat supply Finland, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Nor- — International electricity trading way, Ukraine, Georgia, Azerbaijan, South Ossetia, Ka- A diversified energy holding company — Engineering, power equipment export zakhstan, China and Mongolia. managing assets in Russia, as well as — Management of electricity distribution grids outside Russia Effectively manages power supply companies – guaran- in European and CIS countries. teed suppliers in 12 regions of Russia. Since 2010, PJSC Inter RAO has been rated in the List of Strategic Enterprises and Strategic Joint Stock Compa- Owns independent suppliers of electricity to large indus- nies of the Russian Federation1. trial consumers. GENERATING ASSETS SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ELECTRICITY EXPORT in 2016 THERMAL POWER PLANTS 41 17.0bn kWh ELECTRICITY IMPORT HYDROPOWER PLANTS 62 (including 5 low capacity HPPs) 10 in 2016 IN 62 REGIONS OF RUSSIA bn kWh WIND FARMS 3.1 1 According to the Decree of the President of Russia No. 1190 dated 30.09.2010 PJSC Inter RAO was included in the List of Strategic Enterprises and Strategic Joint-Stock Companies (Section 2 of the List of Open Joint Stock Companies with its assets held in federal ownership managed by the Russian Federation in order to ensure strategic 2 interests of State defence and security, moral values, healthcare, rights and legitimate interests protection of the citizens of the Russian Federation).
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest
    An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: • “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail • The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board • Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee • Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies”, while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample • The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors • Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the development of digital technologies continues • The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit • Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent • The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times • Twenty-four percent of companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Russian State System in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries
    Chapter 6 The Development of the Russian State System in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Pavel ZYRIANOV The last zemskii sobor met in 1683-84. For over 200 years no general Russian representative assemblies were convened, if one does not count Catherine the Great's summoning of the "Great Commission," which had only a limited purpose. During that time a broad array of mutual misunderstandings and estrangements between society and the state developed. Many statesmen, public figures, and even a number of tsars understood how unnatural this situation was. Alexander I, upon assuming the throne in 1801, considered abolishing serfdom, introducing a constitution, and convening a people's government. Above all else, however, he thought it important to strengthen the central government, which was then in a state of routine disarray. The colleges established by Peter the Great were clearly not working out. Widespread evasion of responsibility predominated in them, concealing the taking of bribes and the embezzling of public funds. The local authorities, taking advantage of the weakness of the central government, fostered lawlessness. Alexander hoped to introduce order and to strengthen the state by introducing a ministerial system based on individual management. In 1802 eight ministries were created to replace the previous twelve colleges: the ministry of war, navy, foreign affairs, internal affairs, commerce, finance, public enlightenment, and justice. This measure strengthened the central government, but a decisive victory in the struggle against abuses of power was not achieved. The old defects 108 Pavel Zyrianov were transplanted to the new ministries. It was obvious that it was impossible to solve the problem of creating a system of state authority that would actively contribute to the economic, social, and political development of the country and not devour its resources simply by making some rearrangements in the bureaucratic machine.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Candidates Nominated for Election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC and Information on Availability Or
    Information on candidates nominated for election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC and information on availability or absence of their written consent to election to the Board of Directors of FGC UES, PJSC Status2 Aggregate Membership in the Boards of Directors of Relation to Shareholdi period of other companies ng in the Shareholder(s) Position (at the Candidate’s Candidate’s position and place of membership in Company No. who nominated Date of birth, education moment of I E N at the date of the report Nominated by the affiliates major Consent Full Name employment in the last 5 years1 the Company’s 1 the candidate nomination) candidate counter- Board of parties Directors 2013 – 2013 Director General, JSC Far East and Baikal Region Development Fund; Year of birth: 1973 2013 – 2014 Temporary Chief Pavel Executive Officer of Polyus Gold Higher Sergeyevich International Limited; Director General of Saint Petersburg State PJSC RusHydro Grachev PJSC 2014 – 2016 Chief Executive Officer PJSC Polyus 3 years 10 1 University, Diploma in Legal PJSC Polyus PJSC RusHydro no no no available (as an ROSSETI of Polyus Gold International Limited; Director General of months Studies, Lawyer; independent 2014 – 2016 President, JSC Polyus LLC “MC Polyus” SL Zoloto LLC director) Krasnoyarsk; University of Trieste, major in 2014 – present day Director General Law, J.D. of PJSC Polyus; 2016 – present day Director General of LLC “MC Polyus” 2008 – present day Member of the Year of birth: 1977 Management Board, Endowment Fund The Russian for Support and Development of the Prosperity Fund, Higher: Saint-Petersburg State University; PJSC "Aeroflot" The Prosperity M.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation Constitution
    Strasbourg, 4 February 2021 CDL-REF(2021)010 Opinion No. 992 / 2020 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONSTITUTION (*) (*) Translation provided by the Constitutional Court This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2021)010 - 2 - THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION adopted by popular vote on 12 December 1993, with amendments approved by all-Russian vote on 1 July 2020 We, the multinational people of the Russian Federation, united by a common fate on our land, establishing human rights and freedoms, civil peace and accord, preserving the historically established State unity, proceeding from universally acknowledged principles of equality and self-determination of peoples, proceeding from universally acknowledged principles of equality and self-determination of peoples, revering the memory of ancestors who have passed on to us their love for the Fatherland and faith in good and justice, reviving the sovereign statehood of Russia and asserting the firmness of its democratic basis, striving to ensure the well-being and prosperity of Russia, proceeding from the responsibility for our Fatherland before present and future generations, recognizing ourselves to be a part of the world community, do hereby adopt THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. SECTION ONE CHAPTER 1 THE BASIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM Article 1 1. The Russian Federation – Russia is a democratic federative law-governed state with a republican form of government. 2. The names Russian Federation and Russia are equipollent. Article 2 Man, his rights and freedoms shall be the supreme value.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Regulation of the Synergetic Effect of Innovation in the Structure of National Economies of the Union State
    Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana ISSN: 1315-5216 ISSN: 2477-9555 [email protected] Universidad del Zulia Venezuela Legal Regulation of the Synergetic effect of Innovation in the Structure of National Economies of the Union State ABRAMOV, Ruslan A.; SOKOLOV, Maksim S.; SURILOV, Meir N.; KOCHETKOV, Evgeniy P. Legal Regulation of the Synergetic effect of Innovation in the Structure of National Economies of the Union State Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, vol. 23, no. 82, 2018 Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27957591023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1510262 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Ruslan A. ABRAMOV, et al. Legal Regulation of the Synergetic effect of Innovation in the Structure... Artículos Legal Regulation of the Synergetic effect of Innovation in the Structure of National Economies of the Union State Regulación jurídica del efecto sinérgico de la innovación en la estructura de las economías nacionales del Estado de la Unión Ruslan A. ABRAMOV DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1510262 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Rusia Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? [email protected] id=27957591023 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7381-5214 https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri? authorId=56291991700 Maksim S. SOKOLOV Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Ruanda Meir N. SURILOV Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Rusia Evgeniy P. KOCHETKOV Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Rusia Received: 28 August 2018 Accepted: 09 September 2018 Abstract: Assess of the constitutions of Russia and Belarus, to determine the degree of allowable discrepancy, to compare their laws, the realities of their application will be the science of constitutional law.
    [Show full text]