DOCSLIB.ORG

Acres of Skin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acres of Skin J7ournal ofMedical Ethics 1999;25:353-358 J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.25.4.353 on 1 August 1999. Downloaded from Book reviews Acres of Skin Nazi reference is convenient but slip- be judged inadequate. In general the shod. At the centre of Nazi transgres- prisoners were so attracted by the sion was a public policy-enforced by compensation that, after twenty years Allen M Hornblum, New York and a ruthless dictator-which declared of experimentation the participants London, Routledge, 1998, 297 pages, whole subgroups within human soci- were angry when two of their col- £19.99. ety to have "lives not worth living". leagues testified against the experi- The willing complicity of many Ger- ments before congress (page 198). Acres of Skin presents an angry, mans and German physicians with However imperfect the consent might distressing and provoking description these policies remains a huge warning have been, we must conclude that of human experimentation within the to all of us. Nevertheless, it was in the consent was obtained for these experi- American prison system. Specifically, context of the totalitarian govern- ments. it focuses upon experiments con- ments that the great transgressions Hornblum suggests that many pris- ducted by investigators from the Uni- against human dignity occurred in the oners were injured by their participa- versity of Pennsylvania at the nearby Holmesburg Prison, from 1951 until twentieth century. In Nazi Germany tion, but does not objectively docu- experiments designed to involve severe ment the extent and seriousness of 1974. The research was halted follow- ing congressional hearings in 1973 suffering, often to end in the death of such injuries. This is important. Years copyright. the were part of a racist pseu- ago Comroe pointed out that five which revealed incidents of misuse or subject, potential misuse ofvulnerable popula- doscientific insanity and were ap- patients died before the first successful tions (pages 194-197). proved at the highest level.' 2 No such mitral valve replacement. He did so Hornblum documents disturbing pattern supported the Holmesburg critically, asking whether it was the transgressions of appropriate context experiment nor is it fair to suggest surgeon or the patients who were the whether and care in performing human experi- equivalent amoral behaviour by Dr heroes and also questioning ments. If his recounting of the use of Kligman or his collaborators. these desperate patients were afforded mind-altering drugs under defence Like Annas and Grodin, Hornblum the opportunity to make a truly http://jme.bmj.com/ department or CIA contracts is the uses the Nuremberg Code, developed informed consent.3 In a closing chap- most disturbing, he is equally upset to justify prosecution ofwar criminals, ter Hornblum rails on about Retin-A about the testing of Retin-A which has as his reference. However, the earlier, (a potent and useful acne medicine), proven useful in acne treatment. His 1931 Reich's Health Council Circu- its irritating properties and the role of treatment seems biased. Nevertheless, lar: Regulations on New Therapy and Holmesburg "guinea pigs" in its devel- as a clinical researcher and former Human Experimentation, and the sub- opment. I am troubled by an author faculty member at the University of sequent Helsinki Declarations (I - IV) who links irritated skin to Nazi Pennsylvania I felt compelled to do a seem superior.2 These codes do not transgressions. Clearly some prisoners on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected little background reading' 2 and pose a hang so much on the essential princi- were scarred by dermatological ex- few questions for myself: ple of consent-which occupies some periments, but they continued to one-third of the verbiage in the volunteer and after twenty years it 1. Is Hornblum's comparison with Nuremberg Code and better address seems a majority of prisoners involved Nazi abuses justifiable? critical medical requirements neces- would have chosen to continue their 2. Should the Nuremberg Code be sary for safe and appropriate human involvement. the reference code? experimentation. In addition, these Hornblum does an excellent job of 3. Is he correct in isolating prison codes do not suggest a "guilt by portraying the coercive aspects of experimentation as particularly association" conclusion. None of the prison life and the restrictions upon egregious? codes seem to address the importance prisoners which made participation 4. Does he fairly assess risk and of external scientific and ethical re- attractive. He even presents moder- injury? view, both for determining the legiti- ately convincing information which 5. Did America make a correct deci- macy of a proposed experiment and suggests that prisoners are not par- sion in subsequently excluding the need to terminate an experiment. ticularly good experimental subjects. prisoners from the pool for neces- Hornblum states that consent pro- Yet, the drug to protect infants from sary human experimentation. cedures were inadequate. None the fatal blood cell destruction if they are less, our perspectives have changed born to mothers with incompatible I have grown weary of the often dramatically and analysis of civilian blood types was developed with the hysterical tone now dominating practice in the early 1950s and 60s for cooperation of convicts at Sing Sing. It American public debate and this book obtaining consent for therapeutic or would appear that both prisoners and jangled those raw nerve ends. The experimental interventions would also society benefited from these activities. 354 Book reviews J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.25.4.353 on 1 August 1999. Downloaded from Moreover, it is clear that prisoners social scientists. He simply takes it for The research and policy process were free to refuse participation with granted. Furthermore, readers con- both fail for related reasons. Social no adverse consequences and still cerned with medical ethics will find scientists themselves exist within the sought to participate. Consent was the book a double disappointment. "constituency" of one or the other set deficient, protocols were deficient. But Despite the promise on the back cover of theoretical assumptions. Their re- the modern era of controlled trials that the analysis of welfare policy will search typically seeks to verify their began only a few years before the include "effective health care", health preferred presumptions or to falsitf Holmesburg experience and the steps issues are only tangentially touched those of their opponents, but it fails to necessary to minimise abuse were on. Even the one passing reference to employ sufficient scientific rigour be- developing in parallel in the civilian Medicaid, as absorbing half of all wel- cause the researchers have acquiesced society. (The Econonist noted in Octo- fare expenditure, is made in the course in a series of constraints which under- ber 1998 that publication of the first of establishing Epstein's opening argu- mine the adequacy and rationality of randomised controlled trial occurred ment that the rhetoric of the welfare their procedures. Prominent among in 1948 - streptomycin usage in debate focuses disproportionately on these unchallenged axioms is the need tuberculosis. ') one narrow area - poverty - which for fiscal restraint. In summary, this is a useful and accounts for a mere ten per cent of the In the first place this sets arbitrary provocative study. It would have been total welfare budget. The curious limits on the cost of research and thus better if the author had been less intensity of popular and political con- tempts researchers to take method- overtly biased and had better studied cern with what is a minor slice of pub- ological short cuts - for example, the the concurrent evolution in human lic spending forms the backdrop to the failure to use genuine randomised experimental studies outside of argument of the book. prison. Two more issues warrant controlled trials - which is often com- The main body of the volume is a pounded by researcher bias and prac- attention. First, I find human experi- detailed and damning critique of the mentation necessary, despite its haz- tices embodying "limited rationality", research of recent decades on poverty all of which result in an inability to ards while Hornblum asserts that and certain associated problems "progress is optional" (page 244). develop adequate tests of causation. (specified in consecutive chapters as The imperative of fiscal prudence also Secondly, in his passionate distaste for family structures and intergenera- the Holmesburg Prison experiments, drives the policy process to seek out tional dependency; work and work- low cost welfare solutions. Hornblum diminishes the horrors suf- lessness; training programmes for wel- Epstein believes that these condi-copyright. fered in the camps of the Axis powers fare recipients, and the role of and I find that offensive. tions have produced an increasing personal social services in policies to consensus between conservatives and combat poverty). There then follows a liberals that the core objective of References final chapter advocating an as yet welfare policy should be "social effi- 1 Lifton RJ. The Nazi doctos: mdicdal kill- untried policy of "generosity" which ciency" and that any policy must be ilg anid the psychology of gcocidce. starts from the premise that the author shown to have an immediate, positive Oxford: Basic Books, a subsidiary of has demonstrated the total failure of Perseus Books, LLC, 1986. impact on social cohesion and eco- 2 Annas GJ, Grodin MA, eds. I'lie Nazi the research process to establish a nomic productivity without even shorthttp://jme.bmj.com/ doctors anid the Nnremberg Code.Oxford rational basis for choosing between term disruptive consequences. In and New York: Oxford Universitv existing policy strategies. At this point these circumstances the liberal camp Press, 1992. it becomes clear that the foregoing cri- 3 Comroe JH. Ret-o has lost confidence in insti- Spectroscope: ooisiglhls tique of welfare research is an expensive into miiedical discover%.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Care and Custody in a Pennsylvania Prison
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Wards Of The State: Care And Custody In A Pennsylvania Prison Nicholas Iacobelli University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Public Health Education and Promotion Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Iacobelli, Nicholas, "Wards Of The State: Care And Custody In A Pennsylvania Prison" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2350. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2350 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2350 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wards Of The State: Care And Custody In A Pennsylvania Prison Abstract In this dissertation, I examine the challenges and contradictions as well as the expectations and aspirations involved in the provision of healthcare to inmates in a maximum-security prison in Pennsylvania. In 1976, the Supreme Court granted inmates a constitutional right to healthcare based on the notion that a failure to do so would constitute “cruel and unusual punishment.” Drawing on two years of ethnographic fieldwork from 2014-2016 in the prison’s medical unit with inmates, healthcare providers, and correctional staff, I demonstrate how the legal infrastructure built around this right to healthcare operates in practice and the myriad effects it has for those in state custody. Through traversing the scales of legal doctrine, privatized managed care, and collective historical memory, bringing these structural components to life in personal narratives and clinical interactions, I advance the notion that the physical space of the prison’s medical unit is a “ward of the state” – a space of care where the state itself is “made” through interactions among individuals who relay and enact the legal regulations on inmate healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalnews.Com Printable Article Vaccines and Medical Experiments
    Vaccines and Medical Experiments on Children, Minorities, Woman and Inmates (1845 - ... Page 1 of 17 NaturalNews.com printable article Originally published December 14 2007 Chronic Back Pain Relief Are you HIV Positive? HCV and HIV Positive? New Breakthrough FDA Cleared Non Take a quick survey, compare yours to Learn About What's New in Liver Disease Surgical Pain Relief, no Down Time people just like you. Join Free! Research by Contacting NIH www.SeattleBackPain.com www.patientslikeme.com www.niaid.nih.gov/ Vaccines and Medical Experiments on Children, Minorities, Woman and Inmates (1845 - 2007) by Mike Adams, NaturalNews Editor Think U.S. health authorities have never conducted outrageous medical experiments on children, women, minorities, homosexuals and inmates? Think again: This timeline, originally put together by Dani Veracity (a NaturalNews reporter), has been edited and updated with recent vaccination experimentation programs in Maryland and New Jersey. Here's what's really happening in the United States when it comes to exploiting the public for medical experimentation: (1845 - 1849) J. Marion Sims, later hailed as the "father of gynecology," performs medical experiments on enslaved African women without anesthesia . These women would usually die of infection soon after surgery. Based on his belief that the movement of newborns' skull bones during protracted births causes trismus, he also uses a shoemaker's awl, a pointed tool shoemakers use to make holes in leather, to practice moving the skull bones of babies born to enslaved mothers ( Brinker ). (1895) New York pediatrician Henry Heiman infects a 4-year-old boy whom he calls "an idiot with chronic epilepsy" with gonorrhea as part of a medical experiment ( "Human Experimentation: Before the Nazi Era and After" ).
    [Show full text]
  • IN Support of Prisoner Participation in Clinical Trials
    .. Beneficial and Unusual Punishment: An Argument IN Support of Prisoner Participation IN Clinical Trials Sharona Hoffman* Introduction Until the last few decades of the Twentieth Century, prisoners were widely used in biomedical experimentation in the United States.' Prisoners served as test subjects for substances ranging from perfume, soap, and cosmetics, to dioxin, psychological warfare agents, and radioactive isotopes.^ By 1 969, eighty-five percent of new drugs were tested on incarcerated persons in forty-two prisons,^ and prisoners in the United States were even utilized to test drugs for researchers in other countries."* In the following decade investigations revealed that prisoners who were the subjects of clinical research often suffered serious adverse consequences and severe abuses. Allen Homblum, who, in his book Acres ofSkin, wrote a moving expose of medical research that was conducted in one prison, stated in an early chapter: For two decades—from the early 1950s to the early 1970s—Philadelphia's Holmesburg Prison played host to one of the largest and most varied medical experimentation centers in the country. Only the inmates, and the doctors who experimented on them, know just exactly what took place, but whereas the latter choose not to discuss their earlier medical exploits, the prisoners are not asked. In that respect, Holmesburg is little different from the dozens of other institutions that contained vulnerable populations and [sic] were exploited in the name of scientific advancement. This sad but wide-spread twentieth-century phenomenon has much to teach us about our ethical standards and our capacity for human compassion.^ In light ofthe discovery of severe research abuses, several entities, including the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the American Correctional Association, and the * Assistant Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Captive Lab Rat: Human Medical Experimentation in the Carceral State
    Boston College Law Review Volume 61 Issue 1 Article 2 1-29-2020 The Captive Lab Rat: Human Medical Experimentation in the Carceral State Laura I. Appleman Willamette University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Disability Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Laura I. Appleman, The Captive Lab Rat: Human Medical Experimentation in the Carceral State, 61 B.C.L. Rev. 1 (2020), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol61/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CAPTIVE LAB RAT: HUMAN MEDICAL EXPERIMENTATION IN THE CARCERAL STATE LAURA I APPLEMAN INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 2 I. A HISTORY OF CAPTIVITY AND EXPERIMENTATION .................................................................... 4 A. Asylums and Institutions ........................................................................................................ 5 B. Orphanages, Foundling
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ********** Medical Facilities and Practices within the Department of Corrections ********** House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crimes and Corrections City Hall Building Room 201 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Monday, February 22, 1999 - 1:00 p.m. --0O0-- JEFORE: Honorable Jerry Birmelin, Majority Chairperson Honorable Harold James, Minority Chairperson Honorable Joseph Petrarca lonorable Donald Walko lonorable LeAnna Washington KEY REPORTERS 1300 Garrison Drive, York PA 17404 (717) 764-7801 Fax (717)764-6367 ^LSO PRESENT: David Bloomer Majority Research Analyst CONTENTS WITNESSES PAGE Honorable Harold James, Min. Chairperson 7 Subcommittee on Crime & Corrections PA Department of Corrections Martin F. Horn, Secretary 11 Dr. Fred Maue, Medical Director 27 Catherine McVey, Director 28 Bureau of Healthcare Services Angus Love 2 9 PA Prison Society, Board of Directors Allen M. Hornblum, Author 49 Acres of Skin Nan Feyler, Esquire 76 Director, AIDS Law Project of PA Larry Frankel, Esquire 99 ACLU of Pennsylvania Concerned Citizens Dr. A. Bernard Ackerman 111 Leodus Jones 119 Edward Anthony 125 Dorothy Alston 134 Alfonso Skorski 142 Joseph Smith 149 William Harper 156 THE CHAIRPERSON: Good afternoon. We rould like to welcome you. The subcommittee on Irimes and Corrections is conducting this hearing, Llthough the members of the full committee are Llways invited to attend. And there will be several here. Some are iere already. I will take the time to introduce :hem. First of all, let me tell you that I am :he chairman of the subcommittee. My name is representative Jerry Birmelin, and my district is .n Wayne and Pike Counties. And I'll ask the other members who are Lere to introduce themselves and tell us where rour district is.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2014 “Happy Trials to You” Should Dermatology Be Celebrating Albert M. Kligman?
    Vol. 10, No. 2, February 2014 “Happy Trials to You” Should Dermatology Be Celebrating Albert M. Kligman? By Norman M. Goldfarb In 2007, the Society for Investigative Dermatology (SID) established the annual Albert M. Kligman/Phillip Frost Leadership Lecture and Award. According to the original solicitation for nominees, “The award is made possible by the generosity of Dr. Phillip Frost and will be presented to an individual in acknowledgement of significant contributions to the understanding of structure and function of skin, preferably in the past five years. A $25,000 honorarium accompanies the award.” Phillip Frost, MD, (1935-) has served as Professor of Dermatology at the School of Medicine, University of Miami; Chairman of the Department of Dermatology at Mt. Sinai Medical Center of Greater Miami; Chairman of the Board of Directors of Key Pharmaceuticals; and Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Ivax Corporation, among other accomplishments. Dr. Frost worked as a resident under Dr. Kligman at Holmesburg Prison. Albert M. Kligman, MD (1916-2010) was a figure of great controversy. On one hand, he made major contributions to the field of dermatology, especially related to the use of tretinoin (Retin-A) to treat acne and wrinkles. On the other hand, his grossly unethical research on prisoners at Holmesburg Prison made him the most notorious violator of clinical research ethics in U.S. history. Prior to that, he conducted actively harmful studies on children with intellectually disabilities at the State Colonies for the Feebleminded in Vineland and Woodbine, New Jersey. While Dr. Kligman was hardly alone in blatantly violating fundamental human rights, other clinical research atrocities are known by their location (e.g., Tuskegee) or their victim (e.g., Jesse Gelsinger).
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Medical Racism: the Reconstruction of Whiteness Through the Destruction of Black Bodies
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern University Honors Program Theses 2019 Systemic Medical Racism: The Reconstruction of Whiteness Through the Destruction of Black Bodies. Julisha S. Ford Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the African American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ford, Julisha S., "Systemic Medical Racism: The Reconstruction of Whiteness Through the Destruction of Black Bodies." (2019). University Honors Program Theses. 403. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/403 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 0 Systemic Medical Racism: The Reconstruction of Whiteness Through the Destruction of Black Bodies. An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in History. By Julisha Ford Under the mentorship of Dr. Jonathan Bryant Abstract The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was a non-therapeutic medical study on the effects of untreated syphilis on African American men. From 1932-1972 the Public Health Service of the United States, with the aid of various local doctors, conducted the study on 400 black men of Macon County in Tuskegee, Alabama. The black subjects of the study were not aware that treatment would be withheld nor the purpose of their examination. The legacy of the study has led to discussions on the influence of white authority in medicine and the use of black bodies for intellectual advancement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biref History of Human Experiments
    A Biref History of Human Experiments 1718 George I offers free pardon to any inmate of Newgate Prison who agrees to be inoculated with infectious small pox in variolation experiment. You can read about this in one of our history articles, in the section: The History of Innoculation. 1796 Edward Jenner injects healthy eight-year-old James Phillips first with cowpox then three months later with smallpox and is hailed as discoverer of smallpox vaccine. 1845-1849 J. Marion Sims, the "Father of Gynecology" in the United States, conducts gynecological experiments on slaves in South Carolina. You can read more on Dr Sims in our Biographies. 1865 French physiologist Claude Bernard publishes "Introduction to the Study of Human Experimentation," advising: "Never perform an experiment which might be harmful to the patient even though highly advantageous to science or the health of others. 1874 Cincinnati physician Roberts Bartholow conducts brain surgery experiments on Mary Rafferty, a 30 year- old domestic servant dying of an infected ulcer. 1891 Prussian State legislates that a treatment for tuberculosis cannot be given to prisoners without their consent. 1892 Albert Neisser injects women with serum from patients with Syphilis, infecting half of them. 1896 Dr. Arthur Wentworth performs spinal taps on 29 children at Children's Hospital in Boston to determine if procedure is harmful. 1897 Italian bacteriologist Sanarelli injects five subjects with bacillus searching for a causative agent for yellow fever. 1900 Walter Reed injects 22 Spanish immigrant workers in Cuba with the agent for yellow fever paying them $100 if they survive and $200 if they contract the disease.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exploitation of Inmates: Stateville Penitentiary Malaria Experiment By
    The Exploitation of Inmates: Stateville Penitentiary Malaria Experiment By Katelyn Kalata Western Illinois University Testing on humans for the advancement of science took off during the 1940s, particularly in the United States and Europe. While German concentration camps were becoming known worldwide by the mid-1940s, they were not the only location where human testing occurred during that time period. Following World War II, the defense team in the Nuremberg Trials pointed its attention to the United States. Stateville Correctional Center, located in Crest Hill, Illinois, was one of the many institutions that used an imprisoned population to research diseases and to experiment with different forms of medical treatments and vaccines. Stateville was mentioned during the Nuremberg Trials to justify Nazi experimentation, and the ethical issues related to the “Malaria Project” are still analyzed by researchers today.1 Given the title of a “project” because of its prolonged nature and unforeseen end-date, Nathaniel Comfort is one of the several scholars who examine how this experiment was different than a typical research study.2 Another critical person mentioned throughout this essay is infamous inmate Nathan Leopold. Leopold served as a participant and as a lab assistant. He wrote an autobiography describing the experience, thus, providing scholars with an inside look of what the project looked like. Considering his perspective through reading his autobiography and while analyzing the ethics behind the experiment, it becomes clear that the impact the environment has on a person’s psyche can be profound. A significant source for the research of this essay relies on Leopold’s perspective; however, a variety of primary and secondary sources used throughout this essay 1 “On October 18, 1945, twenty-two of Nazi Germany's political, military, and economic leaders were brought to trial in Nuremberg for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimentation on Prisoners: Persistent Dilemmas in Rights and Regulations
    Experimentation on Prisoners: Persistent Dilemmas in Rights and Regulations Keramet Reitert INTRODUCTION Between 1965 and 1966, Dr. Albert M. Kligman exposed approximately seventy-five prisoners at Holmesburg prison in Pennsylvania to high doses of dioxin, the main poisonous ingredient in Agent Orange.1 Dow Chemical paid Dr. Kligman $10,000 to conduct the experiments on the toxicity effects of this Vietnam War-era chemical warfare agent. Dr. Kligman exposed prisoners to a dosage 468 times greater than that in the Dow Chemical protocol for the experiments. 2 Records from the experiments have been destroyed, and the Environmental Protection Agency's 1981 investigation into the matter failed to identify the exact participants, rendering the long-term effects of the exposure untraceable. 3 Nonetheless, prisoners who participated in dermatological experiments under Dr. Kligman's hand in 1965 and 1966 report that they still experience scars, blisters, cysts, and ongoing rashes.4 Indeed, at least two prisoners filed lawsuits against Dow Chemical in the 1980s for the exposure they suffered in the 1960s; both settled their claims for undisclosed sums.5 Dr. Kligman is perhaps better known for developing the skin treatment Retin-A, at Copyright © 2009 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. t J.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Boalt Hall), expected 2009; Ph.D. in Jurisprudence and Social Policy, University of California, Berkeley, expected 2012; M.A., John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York 2006; B.A., Harvard University 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 2, No. 4, April 2006 “Can You Handle the Truth?” Acres of Skin
    Vol. 2, No. 4, April 2006 “Can You Handle the Truth?” Acres of Skin: The Lost Chapter Editor’s note: In 1998, Allen M. Hornblum published the book “Acres of Skin,” a fascinating account of clinical research at Holmesburg prison. We are honored to make this unpublished chapter available to the public for the first time. The book is still in print… – NMG A Conspiracy of Silence By Allen M. Hornblum I According to many of its proud graduates, the Dermatology Department of the Medical School of the University of Pennsylvania has had nothing short of a profound influence on the “rise of dermatology” in America. Considered a “static, superficial medical sub-division” throughout most of the 19th century and the early part of the 20th, many Penn dermatology grads believe it would still be an undesired, backwater specialty for those who couldn’t quite cut it in more rigorous fields, if it was not for the considerable talents and contributions of several extraordinary Penn physicians.1 Though many of his disciples accord Dr. Albert M. Kligman the honor of this singular achievement, the more historically minded see the true beginnings of Penn’s unique dermatological success story originating with Dr. Louis A. Duhring, a Philadelphian of affluent, German parentage who single-handedly labored to upgrade dermatology from a “superficial specialty” to a bonafide medical department in post-Civil War America. Duhring opened the Philadelphia Dispensary for Skin Diseases in 1871, and its clinic became the training ground for some of the nation’s most accomplished dermatologists. The growth and respect for Penn’s dermatology program continued over the decades and was periodically enhanced by such distinguished physicians as John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Addiction: the Science and Politics of Substance Abuse
    Discovering Addiction Discovering Addiction The Science and Politics of Substance Abuse Research nancy d. campbell The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor Copyright © by the University of Michigan 2007 All rights reserved Published in the United States of America by The University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid-free paper 2010 2009 2008 2007 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Campbell, Nancy Dianne. Discovering addiction : the science and politics of substance abuse research / Nancy D. Campbell. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-472-11610-2 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-472-11610-X (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Substance abuse. I. Title. [dnlm: 1. Substance-Related Disorders. 2. Health Policy. wm 270 c189d 2007] rc564.c33 2007 362.29—dc22 2007023393 Against amnesia, this book is dedicated to the researchers at Lexington and the postaddicts who served as human subjects in the obscurity of long-dead laboratories Acknowledgments The social worlds of drug policy historians and substance abuse researchers are convivial thought collectives. I would particularly like to thank Joseph Spillane, who forged a relationship with the University of Michigan Substance Abuse Research Center (UMSARC). Carol Boyd and Sean MacCabe facilitated our relationship with the College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD), the modern-day incarnation of the original National Research Coun- cil committee described (under its various names) in this book.
    [Show full text]