DOCSLIB.ORG

North Sea Checkpoint Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Sea Checkpoint Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas Growth & Innovation in the Ocean Economy: North Sea Checkpoint Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas DLS0342-RT006-R02-00 August 2015 Growth & Innovation in the Ocean Economy: North Sea Checkpoint Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas Document information Document permissions Confidential - client Project number DLS0342 Project name Growth & Innovation in the Ocean Economy: North Sea Checkpoint Report title Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas Report number RT006 Release number R02-00 Report date August 2015 Client European Commission DG MARE Client representative Iain Shepherd Project manager Marie Pendle Project director Quillon Harpham Document history Date Release Prepared Approved Authorised Notes 07 Aug 2015 02-00 MEP MPN QKH Updates following client comments 01 May 2015 01-00 MEP MPN GBS Document authorisation Prepared Approved Authorised © HR Wallingford Ltd This report has been prepared for HR Wallingford’s client and not for any other person. Only our client should rely upon the contents of this report and any methods or results which are contained within it and then only for the purposes for which the report was originally prepared. We accept no liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person who has relied on the contents of this report, other than our client. This report may contain material or information obtained from other people. We accept no liability for any loss or damage suffered by any person, including our client, as a result of any error or inaccuracy in third party material or information which is included within this report. To the extent that this report contains information or material which is the output of general research it should not be relied upon by any person, including our client, for a specific purpose. If you are not HR Wallingford’s client and you wish to use the information or material in this report for a specific purpose, you should contact us for advice. DLS0342-RT006-R02-00 Growth & Innovation in the Ocean Economy: North Sea Checkpoint Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas Executive Summary This document summarises the findings of the Marine Protected Areas challenge, conducted as part of the North Sea Checkpoint project (NSCP). This is the second of the project challenges to be completed. This report is the sixth deliverable to DG Mare under the North Sea Check Point project (Growth and Innovation in the Ocean Economy – Gaps and Priorities in sea basin and observation data MARE/2012/11: North Sea) contract reference SI2.658142. The work for this Marine Protected Areas (MPA) Challenge was undertaken by MacAlister Elliot & Partners (MEP). This document is the second Data Adequacy Report (DAR) presenting the findings for a completed challenge. Points for EMODnet Bathymetry portal - If more complex larval connectivity analyses were to be conducted by a marine user, bathymetry datasets may prove to be very useful when modelling larval movement over certain ocean features. Seabed Habitats portal - Datasets in this portal were useful the MPA Challenge. The broad scale habitats dataset (EUSeaMap) was downloaded for use in the ‘Features and Representivity’ aspect of the Challenge (see Section 5.1.2). The OSPAR habitat data set is also available for download from this portal. Both datasets were selected for use as they allowed full (albeit coarse) coverage of the North Sea basin. • The EUSeaMap predictive habitat map did not fully cover the extent of the study area, whereas the OSPAR dataset did. • The types of habitats represented are different: The EUSeaMap data set is based on EUNIS habitat classification and OSPAR has its own habitat classification • The resulting ‘Features and Representivity’ statistics differed depending on the dataset. The majority of the OSPAR threatened and/or declining habitats were well represented within the MPA network, all having a significant number of replicates in MPAs, whereas the EUNIS habitats showed a more mixed picture. Many of the named habitats without a EUNIS code were bathyal (c. 1000-4000 meters depth) or deep sea habitats located around the coast of Norway or north of Shetland/Orkney, which are areas with relatively poor MPA coverage. Biology portal - Generally, the data sets provided by the Biology Portal relate to data collected over short time periods or in relation to specific species in target locations, which was not useful for basin- wide analysis. Species distribution datasets were not at a useful level of detail for the MPA analysis. The species distribution datasets display the whole species range, and although some datasets are available for some species listed under Annex I and II and OSPAR, mapping their general range overlap with MPA distribution is too coarse a scale. More pertinently, not all species featured in the North Sea MPA network have datasets. Therefore, the type of dataset that would have been useful for this challenge would be have been a spatial data layer file, containing point data of the locations of Annex I and II and OSPAR species listed in North Sea MPAs. This would allow a marine user to easily identify to what extent the MPA network might protected these species. Most data is point occurrence, without consideration of species movements, even when seasonal distributions are known to alter. DLS0342-RT006-R02-00 Growth & Innovation in the Ocean Economy: North Sea Checkpoint Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas Points for EMODnet Human Activities portal - This provides a very useful data service for marine users wanting to get a general idea of the size of the North Sea MPA network. Some improvements could be made to variety of fisheries datasets that are available through this Portal. Data on fishing catches is useful, but in the context of MPAs, a more useful dataset for the future might be a data layer of seabed impact and/or fishing effort by various fishing gears. We acknowledge that this portal is still at an early state and has not yet fully populated its data catalogue. DLS0342-RT006-R02-00 Growth & Innovation in the Ocean Economy: North Sea Checkpoint Data Adequacy Report - Marine Protected Areas Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction _________________________________________________________ 1 2. Aim _______________________________________________________________ 1 3. Context ____________________________________________________________ 2 3.1. Data gathering ................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Data analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3. Data adequacy assessment .............................................................................................................. 7 4. Data _______________________________________________________________ 7 5. Results ____________________________________________________________ 14 5.1. Challenge output ............................................................................................................................. 14 5.1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 14 5.1.2. Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 14 5.1.3. Outcome ............................................................................................................................ 21 5.2. Data Adequacy ................................................................................................................................ 22 5.2.1. Contribution – Does the data contain the right parameters? ............................................. 23 5.2.2. Location – Does the data cover the correct time / space location? ................................... 24 5.2.3. Commercial – Are the commercial terms acceptable? ...................................................... 25 5.2.4. Attributes – Does the data have the correct attributes? .................................................... 25 5.2.5. Delivery - Can the data be provided to match the timeframe of the challenge?................ 26 5.2.6. Usability – Is the data format and supporting information suitable? .................................. 26 5.3. Key Data Gaps ................................................................................................................................ 27 5.4. Country MPA Information Points ..................................................................................................... 28 6. Discussion and Conclusions ___________________________________________ 30 6.1. Discussion ....................................................................................................................................... 30 6.2. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 31 7. References ________________________________________________________ 32 Appendices ____________________________________________________________ 33 A. List of organisations contacted B. GeoDatabase metadata export C. Data Assessment D. Results of the fine filter replication and representation tests for habitats in the North Sea MPA Network E. Figures Tables Table 4.1: Datasets considered suitable in the marine protected areas challenge ...................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 126. South Coast Plain Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 126. South Coast Plain Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 126. South Coast Plain Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Abberton Reservoir Expansion Project the Story So
    Abberton Reservoir expansion project the story so far Abberton Reservoir is to be enlarged to increase its capacity by Contents more than 50% - but how did the reservoir come into being? 04 Introduction 06 History of the supply network 08 Construction of the reservoir 12 The main dam 14 Other reservoir structures 20 The war years 21 Air raids 22 Post war developments 23 Environmental history 2 | Abberton Reservoir Expansion Project Abberton Reservoir Expansion Project | 3 To Colchester Layer-de- From River Stour Birch ct No.3 la-Haye Intake Works N Malting Green Aquadu Layer-de-la-Haye Overflow from Treatment Works Gravel Lagoon Reservoir Introduction and Pumping Station 8 . Drain from Gravel Lagoon Works Entrance Aquaduct No.7 Aquaduct No Birch Green Aquaduct No.6 To South and Mid-Essex Divisions Abberton Pumping Station Limit of E.W.Co Abberton reservoir lies 4 miles to the southwest Land of Colchester, in the county of Essex, between the villages of Layer-de-la-Haye and Abberton. Constructed in the late 1930’s on the course of Limit of E.W.Co Land Layer Brook, which runs into the Roman River, it covers an area of 1210 acres, holds 26,000 mega Layer Brook litres (5,700 million gallons) of water and has a B1026 top water level of 17.8m AOD. To Maldon It was constructed to store water from winter rainfall for summer use as part of the water supply network for the southern half of Essex. Water is abstracted from the river Stour at Stratford St Mary and pumped 16 kilometers (11 miles) into the reservoir through 34” and 36” steel pipelines.
    [Show full text]
  • 461 I. Introduction. and Cardita Deltoidea +
    Downloaded from http://jgslegacy.lyellcollection.org/ at University of Oregon on June 23, 2016 ON THE F~0CENE AI~D 0LI60OENE OF THE HAMPSHIRE BASIN. 461 45. On the RELATIONS of the EocEnE and OLIa0CEN~ STRATA in the HA~trSHIR~. BASlI~. By Prof. JoH~ W. JuDD, F.R.S., See. G.S. (Read April 26, 1882.) I. Introduction. SI~cx the publication of my paper "On the Oligocene Strata of the Hampshire Basin" *, I have been favoured with many valuable suggestions and criticisms from geologists, both in this and other countries ; and the time has now perhaps arrived when some of the interesting c!uestions thus raised may be discussed with advantage. The great object of my former memoir was to determine the age and relations of a series of marine beds which contain a highly interesting fauna--a fauna presenting the closest affinities with that of a well-defined system of strata very widely distributed in Central Europe. In framing his classification of the Hampshire Tertiaries, the late Prof. Edward Forbes gave no pIace t~ this important series of beds--a fact which does not seam t~ Iiave bt~ea Strfiiciently considered by those among my critics who h~ve ~mm'rea.r ~ay proposed modifi- cation of Forbes's classification as tmaecessary-ahd, therefore, un- warrantable. The history of the discovery of this i~tevestiug marine series does not appear to be generally known. The late Sir Charles Lycll spent his earliest years in the New Forest, residing at Bartley Lodge near Lyndhurst. At that time shelly marls appear to have been in great request among agriculturists, being employed by them as a manure on some of the poorer soils, like the similar materials of the French Fahluns and our own Crags.
    [Show full text]
  • SC1: South Coast Shoreline
    Overall Character THE WEST SUSSEX LANDSCAPE Land Management Guidelines This long narrow Character Area extends between West Wittering and Shoreham and comprises the majority of the West Sussex coastline. It is a distinctive low, open and exposed landscape which has an overriding visual and physical association with the sea. Its wide and gently curved bays are further defined by the protruding shingle headland of Selsey Bill, and the chalk headland of Beachy Head in neighbouring East Sussex. This is a dynamic character area whose key characteristics are linked by coastal evolution, weather and tides. Sheet SC1 The character varies considerably according to weather condition and seasons. Key Characteristics G Relatively narrow undeveloped sections of coastline behind beaches. Bounded by low South Coast growing scant vegetation and small areas of wind-sculpted scrub and trees. Often G To the east of Selsey Bill, mainly shingle banks with bands of sand and mud exposed at providing separation of urban areas. Areas of both high ecological and landscape Shoreline low tide. importance. South Coast Plain G To the west of Selsey Bill, mainly sandy beaches, dry sand dunes and grassland habitats. G Shingle and sand dune habitats of national importance, notably at West Wittering, G Influence of extensive linear urban coastal resort development.To the east,almost Shoreham and Climping. The area covered by the Sheet is derived from: continuous conurbation of Bognor Regis, Littlehampton,Worthing and Shoreham.To the G Reed beds, streams and deep drainage ditches known as rifes. west, notably villages of West Wittering, East Wittering and Bracklesham. Separated by G Frequent wooden and rock groynes and breakwaters.
    [Show full text]
  • South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report
    South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report Final September 2011 Prepared for South Essex: Outline Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule South Essex Water Cycle Study September 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2011 D132233: S. Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Carl Pelling Essex Outline Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant WCS – First Draft_v1 02 August 2011 Final Draft Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Carl Pelling Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Principal Consultant 03 September Final Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2011 Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Technical Director URS/Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke RG21 7PP Tel 01256 310200 Fax 01256 310201 www.urs-scottwilson.com South Essex Water Cycle Study Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Basildon Borough Council, Castle Point Borough Council and Rochford District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Processes Review
    Water and Environment Management Framework Lot 3 – Engineering and Related Services West Wight Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy Appendix C - Coastal Processes and Geotechnics Summary August 2015 Document overview Capita | AECOM was commissioned by the Isle of Wight Council in October 2014 to undertake a Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy. As part of this commission, a brief review of coastal processes and geotechnics has been undertaken to inform the option development phase of the Strategy. Document history Version Status Issue date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by George Batt – Assistant Coastal Jonathan Short Engineer Tara-Leigh Draft for – 1 30th March 2015 Jason McVey – comment Senior Coastal Drummond – Associate Specialist Principal Flood and Coastal Specialist George Batt – Assistant Coastal Updated Jonathan Short Engineer Tara-Leigh following – 2 4th August 2015 Jason McVey – client Senior Coastal Drummond – Associate comments Specialist Principal Flood and Coastal Specialist Scott House, Alencon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP. i Limitations Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd (“Capita”) | URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Isle of Wight Council in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by Capita | AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of Capita | AECOM. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Loe Bar to Mullion Cove
    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Penzance to St Mawes PSM 4: Loe Bar to Mullion Cove Part 4.1: Introduction Start Point: Loe Bar (grid reference: SW64142425) End Point: Mullion Cove (grid reference: SW66771787) Re le vant M aps: PSM 4a to PSM 4e 4.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to this stretch of coast between Penzance and St Mawes. 4.1.2 This report covers length PSM 4 of the stretch, which is the coast between Loe Bar and Mullion Cove. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 4.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Maritime Natural Area: MIO. Whitstable to Geological Significance: Notable North Foreland (provisional) General geologicaVgeomorpholugicaIcharactcr: The Whitstable to North Foreland Maritime Natural Area has a varied coastline with relatively low-lying coast in thc cast rising to boulder clay and chalk cliffs towards the Isle of Thanet. Geological Htrtory: This coastline is characterised by the Cretaceous chalk of the Isle oTThanet bounded to the west by clays, silts and sands of the Lower ‘I’ertiary. Upper Cretaceous Santonian chalk (87-83 Ma) is exposed dipping gently to the west from Margatc to the eastern side of Herne Bay. Unconformably overlying the chalk is a sequence of Lower Tertiary scdiments which are exposed in I Ierne Bay; the Palaeocenc Thanet, Woolwicli and Oldhaven Formations overlain by the Eocene London Clay Formation. The Chalk was deposited by a shallow sea which covered much of Northwestern Europe towards the end of the Cretaceous. Sea lcvel fall was followed by the unconformabie deposition of Tertiary Palaeocene and Ikcene sedirnents. Dominantly marine in origin, these scdiments were deposited by a rising, but fluctuating sea, which covered much of Southeast England. Marine conditions were well established by the Eocene leading to the deposition ofthe i,ondon Clay Formation. Thc fossil fauna and flora from the Tertiary rocks indicates a gradually warming climate with sub-tropical conditions established by the Eocene. Subsequent uplilt (associated with the Alpine Orogeny) and resultant erosion removed much of the remaining Tertiary sediments, the next deposition occurring during the Pleistocene. Though not covercd by ice, the area was affectcd by periglacial erosion in a tundra-like environment during the last glaciation (Devensian).
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Recharge in Sussex & East Kent
    BEACH RECHARGE IN SUSSEX & EAST KENT: A PRELIMINARY INVENTORY & OVERVIEW Compiled by R. Williams, edited by C. Moses. Not to be quoted without permission 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 2 Inventory of beach recharge schemes ..............................................................................5 3 Notes and sources ............................................................................................................9 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................17 5 References......................................................................................................................21 1 Introduction Sand and shingle are being lost from many beaches in Sussex and Kent as a result of natural coastal processes as well as ill-designed sea defence and coastal protection schemes. To counteract falling beach levels, the Environment Agency and local authorities are increasingly resorting to “topping-up” the beaches with additional sand and shingle. Several terms are currently employed to refer to the artificial provision of extra beach material, but there is disagreement about their precise definition. For the purpose of this report, beach nourishment (or beach replenishment) is defined as the supply of material that has been dredged from the seabed or extracted from inland sand and gravel pits. Beach recycling is defined as the removal
    [Show full text]