DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Ecology Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Ecology Assessment Proposed Surat North Development Wandoan, Queensland TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY ASSESSMENT Report prepared for QGC Document Control Sheet File Number: 0360-001 Project Manager: Lindsay Popple Client: QGC Project Title: Terrestrial Ecology Assessment — Proposed Surat North Development Project Author/s: Lindsay Popple, Chris Sanderson, Alanna Main, Lui Weber, Brett Taylor, Adam Abbott, Maree Gilbert, James Wilson, Penn Lloyd, Chris Spain, Ria Zoeller, Paulette Jones, Jedd Appleton Project Summary: A baseline and impact assessment of terrestrial ecological values for the proposed Surat North Development located near Wandoan, southern Queensland. Revision/Checking History Track Version Date Issued Checked By Issued By 0360-001 Version 0 17/01/2014 Jedd Appleton Lindsay Popple Version Date Dispatched to Destination Revision History Digital Copy to Client PDF on Server PDF Backup Copy 0360-001 Version 0 23/01/2014 23/01/2014 23/01/2014 BAAM Pty Ltd File No: 0360-001 Version 0 NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS REPORT Copyright and reproduction This report and all indexes, schedules, annexures or appendixes are subject to copyright pursuant to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Subject to statutory defences, no party may reproduce, publish, adapt or communicate to the public, in whole or in part, the content of this report without the express written consent of Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd. Purpose of Report Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd has produced this report in its capacity as consultants for and on the request of QGC (the "Client") for the sole purpose of undertaking an assessment of terrestrial ecological values within lands potentially impacted by the proposed Surat North Development near Wandoan in southern Queensland (the "Specified Purpose"). This information and any recommendations in this report are particular to the Specified Purpose and are based on facts, matters and circumstances particular to the subject matter of the report and the Specified Purpose at the time of production. This report is not to be used, nor is it suitable, for any purpose other than the Specified Purpose. Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd disclaims all liability for any loss and/or damage whatsoever arising either directly or indirectly as a result of any application, use or reliance upon the report for any purpose other than the Specified Purpose. This report has been produced solely for the benefit of the Client. Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd does not accept that a duty of care is owed to any party other than the Client. This report is not to be used by any third party other than as authorised in writing by Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd and any such use shall continue to be limited to the Specified Purpose. Further, Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd does not make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use in whole or in part of the report or application or use of any other information or process disclosed in this report and to the full extent allowed by law excludes liability in contract, tort or otherwise, for any loss or damage sustained by any person or body corporate arising from or in connection with the supply or use of the whole part of the report through any cause whatsoever. Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd has used information provided to it by the Client and governmental registers, databases, departments and agencies in the preparation of this report. Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd does not know, nor does it have any reason to suspect, that the information provided to it was false, inaccurate, incomplete or misleading at the time of its receipt. This report is supplied on the basis that while Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd believes all the information in it is deemed reliable at the time of publication, it does not warrant its accuracy or completeness and to the full extent allowed by law excludes liability in contract, tort or otherwise, for any loss or damage sustained by any person or body corporate arising from or in connection with the supply or use of The whole or any part of the information in this report through any cause whatsoever. Signed on behalf of Date: 23 January 2013 Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd Managing Director BAAM Pty Ltd File No: 0360-001 Version 0 TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROPOSED SURAT NORTH DEVELOPMENT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. DESKTOP REVIEW ................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. FIELD SURVEYS ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1. Field survey coverage and timing ................................................................................... 2 2.2.2. Terrestrial Flora .............................................................................................................. 2 2.2.3. Terrestrial Fauna ............................................................................................................ 7 2.3. MAPPING OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL VALUES................................................................... 10 2.3.1. Project-scale Vegetation Mapping ................................................................................ 10 2.3.2. Habitat Mapping for Significant Species ....................................................................... 11 2.3.3. Mapping of Terrestrial Ecological Constraints .............................................................. 10 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................... 12 3.1. BIOREGIONAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 12 3.2. MAPPED VEGETATION COMMUNITIES ..................................................................................... 12 3.2.1. Certified and Revised Mapping of Vegetation .............................................................. 12 3.2.2. Wetlands and Springs .................................................................................................. 23 3.2.3. Matters of National Environmental Significance under the EPBC Act .......................... 23 3.2.4. Environmentally Sensitive Areas .................................................................................. 26 3.2.5. Biodiversity Planning Assessment ............................................................................... 27 3.3. TERRESTRIAL FLORA AND FAUNA SPECIES ............................................................................ 28 3.3.1. Terrestrial Flora Species .............................................................................................. 28 3.3.2. Terrestrial Fauna Species ............................................................................................ 28 3.3.3. Koala ............................................................................................................................ 31 3.3.4. Significant Exotic Terrestrial Species ........................................................................... 32 3.4. TERRESTRIAL FLORA AND FAUNA HABITAT ............................................................................. 32 3.4.1. Habitat Mapping for EVNT Species .............................................................................. 32 3.4.2. Habitats for Terrestrial Fauna Species ......................................................................... 37 4.0 CONSTRAINTS MAPPING .................................................................................................... 42 4.1. CONSTRAINTS MAPPING METHODOLOGY ............................................................................... 42 4.2. CONSTRAINTS MAPPING RESULTS ......................................................................................... 43 5.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................ 45 5.1. POTENTIAL IMPACTS ............................................................................................................. 45 5.1.1. Clearing ........................................................................................................................ 45 5.1.2. Construction Activities .................................................................................................. 48 5.1.3. Operational Phase ........................................................................................................ 48 5.1.4. Decommissioning Phase .............................................................................................. 48 5.2. MITIGATION........................................................................................................................... 49 5.2.1. Impact Avoidance ......................................................................................................... 49 5.2.2. General Mitigation ........................................................................................................ 49 5.2.3. Pre-clearance Surveys ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site
    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACTS of the UNPRECEDENTED 2019-20 BUSHFIRES on AUSTRALIAN ANIMALS NOVEMBER 2020 Acknowledgements
    AUSTRALIA IMPACTS OF THE UNPRECEDENTED 2019-20 BUSHFIRES ON AUSTRALIAN ANIMALS NOVEMBER 2020 Acknowledgements WWF-Australia acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land on which we work and their continuing connection to their lands, waters, and culture. We pay our respects to Elders – past and present, and their emerging leaders. WWF-Australia is part of the world’s largest conservation network. WWF-Australia has been working to create a world where people live in harmony with nature since 1978. WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the Earth’s CONTENTS natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. Prepared by Lily M van Eeden, Dale Nimmo, Michael BACKGROUND 10 Mahony, Kerryn Herman, Glenn Ehmke, Joris Driessen, James O’Connor, Gilad Bino, Martin Taylor and Chris 1.1 Fire in Australia 10 Dickman for WWF-Australia 1.2 The 2019-20 bushfire season 10 We are grateful to the researchers who provided data or feedback on the report. These include: 1.3 Scope of this study 12 • Eddy Cannella 1.3.1 Taxa included 14 • David Chapple 1.3.2 Study area 14 • Hugh Davies • Deanna Duffy 1.4 Limitations 17 • Hugh Ford • Chris Johnson 1. MAMMALS 18 • Brad Law 2.1 Methods 18 • Sarah Legge • David Lindenmayer 2.1.1 Most mammals 18 • Simon McDonald 2.1.2 Koalas 19 • Damian Michael 2.2 Results 22 • Harry Moore • Stewart Nichol 2.3 Caveats 22 • Alyson Stobo-Wilson • Reid Tingley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park
    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park Hiltaba Pastoral Lease and Gawler Ranges National Park, South Australia Survey conducted: 12 to 22 Nov 2012 Report submitted: 22 May 2013 P.J. Lang, J. Kellermann, G.H. Bell & H.B. Cross with contributions from C.J. Brodie, H.P. Vonow & M. Waycott SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes Bush Blitz – Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges NP, November 2012 Report submitted to Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study: 22 May 2013. Published online on http://data.environment.sa.gov.au/: 25 Nov. 2016. ISBN 978-1-922027-49-8 (pdf) © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resouces, South Australia, 2013. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, images, and other material or devices protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, this report is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. All other rights are reserved. This report should be cited as: Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1, 2, Bell, G.H.1 & Cross, H.B.1, 2, 3 (2013). Flora survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park: vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes. Report for Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1State Herbarium of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Recovery of Woody Plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion
    Post-fire recovery of woody plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion Peter J. ClarkeA, Kirsten J. E. Knox, Monica L. Campbell and Lachlan M. Copeland Botany, School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA. ACorresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract: The resprouting response of plant species to fire is a key life history trait that has profound effects on post-fire population dynamics and community composition. This study documents the post-fire response (resprouting and maturation times) of woody species in six contrasting formations in the New England Tableland Bioregion of eastern Australia. Rainforest had the highest proportion of resprouting woody taxa and rocky outcrops had the lowest. Surprisingly, no significant difference in the median maturation length was found among habitats, but the communities varied in the range of maturation times. Within these communities, seedlings of species killed by fire, mature faster than seedlings of species that resprout. The slowest maturing species were those that have canopy held seed banks and were killed by fire, and these were used as indicator species to examine fire immaturity risk. Finally, we examine whether current fire management immaturity thresholds appear to be appropriate for these communities and find they need to be amended. Cunninghamia (2009) 11(2): 221–239 Introduction Maturation times of new recruits for those plants killed by fire is also a critical biological variable in the context of fire Fire is a pervasive ecological factor that influences the regimes because this time sets the lower limit for fire intervals evolution, distribution and abundance of woody plants that can cause local population decline or extirpation (Keith (Whelan 1995; Bond & van Wilgen 1996; Bradstock et al.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Atlas’, a Coal Seam Gas Field in the Surat Basin
    7 — APPENDICES Appendix C – ERM Ecological Assessment Report Public—24 October 2018 © Jemena Limited Atlas Lateral Project Gas Compression Facility Ecological Assessment Report 0461545_FINAL September 2018 The business of sustainability Atlas Lateral Project Approved by: Dr David Dique Gas Compression Facility Ecological Assessment Report Position: Partner Senex Energy Limited Signed: September 2018 0461545 FINAL Date: 21 September 2018 www.erm.com This disclaimer, together with any limitations specified in the report, apply to use of this report. This report was prepared in accordance with the contracted scope of services for the specific purpose stated and subject to the applicable cost, time and other constraints. In preparing this report, ERM relied on: (a) client/third party information which was not verified by ERM except to the extent required by the scope of services, and ERM does not accept responsibility for omissions or inaccuracies in the client/third party information; and (b) information taken at or under the particular times and conditions specified, and ERM does not accept responsibility for any subsequent changes. This report has been prepared solely for use by, and is confidential to, the client and ERM accepts no responsibility for its use by other persons. This report is subject to copyright protection and the copyright owner reserves its rights. This report does not constitute legal advice. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 2 1.2 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT 2 2 RELEVANT LEGISLATION 5 3 ASSESSMENT APPROACH
    [Show full text]
  • A Aura Rhom Anntica Mbifo Arpa Ollia
    Plant of the Week AAuurraannttiiccaarrppaa rrhhoommbbiiffoolliiaa Diammond Leaf Pittoosporum, White Hollywood Until recently, we would have called this tree Pittosporum rhombifolium, but in the year 2000, botanists decided that, together with another 5 species also previously included in the genus Pittosporum, it was more appropriately included in Auranticarpa (meaning “golden fruit”)1. The Diamond Laurel, Diamond Leaf Pittosporum or White Hollywood, is a small to medium rainforest tree that grows on basalt soils from the Richmond River in northern NSW to the Forty Mile Scrub National Park near the Undara Lava Tubes on the Kennedy Highway south-west of Innisfail in tropical north Queensland. White flowers in late spring and early summer are followed by spectacular displays of bright orange fruit in late summer and autumn. The specific name rhombifolia refers to the rhomboid, or diamond, shaped leaves. Butterflies are attracted to the nectar in flowers and seeds are eaten and dispersed by birds. Not surprisingly, this has become a very popular garden plant, not just in Australia but elsewhere in the world. Distribution of Auranticarpa rhombifolia in Australia. Outliers indicate trees planted in parks, gardens or as street trees. 1 Cayzer, L.W., Crisp, M.D. & Telford, I.R.H. (2000) Auranticarpa, a new genus of Pittosporaceae from northern Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 13(6): 907-909 2Society for Growing Australian Plants, Queensland Region: www.sgapqld.org.au/butterfly_attracting.pdf Map: Distribution of Auranticarpa rhombifolia, Atlas of Living Australia, http://bie.ala.org.au/species/Auranticarpa+rhombifolia Alison Downing & Kevin Downing 12.03.2012 Downing Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park June 2011
    Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park June 2011 Eucalyptus socialis subsp. socialis / Eucalyptus leptophylla mid mallee woodland with Triodia irritans hummock grass understratum, Brookfield Conservation Park Acknowledgements TERN gratefully acknowledges the South Australian Department of Environment and Water for their assistance and support during the project and for allowing access to the park. Thanks also to the many volunteers who helped to collect, curate and process the data and samples. Lastly, many thanks to staff from the South Australian Herbarium for undertaking the plant identifications. Citation: TERN (2020) Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park, June 2011. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide. Contents Summary of Plots in Brookfield Conservation Park ........................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Accessing the Data ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Practice Captive Reptile and Amphibian Husbandry Nature Conservation Act 1992
    Code of Practice Captive Reptile and Amphibian Husbandry Nature Conservation Act 1992 ♥ The State of Queensland, Department of Environment and Science, 2020 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without prior written permission of the Department of Environment and Science. Requests for permission should be addressed to Department of Environment and Science, GPO Box 2454 Brisbane QLD 4001. Author: Department of Environment and Science Email: [email protected] Approved in accordance with section 174A of the Nature Conservation Act 1992. Acknowledgments: The Department of Environment and Science (DES) has prepared this code in consultation with the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and recreational reptile and amphibian user groups in Queensland. Human Rights compatibility The Department of Environment and Science is committed to respecting, protecting and promoting human rights. Under the Human Rights Act 2019, the department has an obligation to act and make decisions in a way that is compatible with human rights and, when making a decision, to give proper consideration to human rights. When acting or making a decision under this code of practice, officers must comply with that obligation (refer to Comply with Human Rights Act). References referred to in this code- Bustard, H.R. (1970) Australian lizards. Collins, Sydney. Cann, J. (1978) Turtles of Australia. Angus and Robertson, Australia. Cogger, H.G. (2018) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. Revised 7th Edition, CSIRO Publishing. Plough, F. (1991) Recommendations for the care of amphibians and reptiles in academic institutions. National Academy Press: Vol.33, No.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Pages from Lockyer Wildlife Calendar
    January Main image Eastern Sedgefrog Litoria fallax The Eastern February Main image Yellow Admiral Vanessa itea This fast-flying March Main image Thick-tailed Gecko Underwoodisaurus milii Sedge Frog is a very common amphibian in the Lockyer butterfly is a common resident of the Lockyer Valley. It is This unusual little lizard is also known as the Barking Valley. It is found in all moist habitats except for rain forest. very active and rarely rests for any length of time. Search Gecko. It has received this name because of its behaviour Look for it at the base of lilies and other plants around the exposed areas of ground or down low on tree trunks when annoyed or confronting a predator. In these situations edges of your ornamental pool or goldfish pond. This is one on low shrubs for this insect. The Yellow Admiral has a the Barking Gecko will raise its body tip-toe off the ground of our smallest local frogs, growing to a maximum length of habit of resting head downward on tree trunks. Males lunging open-mouthed at its tormentor, all the while uttering 30mm. Males call from vegetation surrounding wetlands or establish territories on exposed patches of ground on hot a loud harsh squeak. This might well be quite confronting from water lilies or other floating vegetation. The call is a long creak often followed afternoons, where they’ll perch with their spread wings facing the sun. They are quite for a predator such as a Common Dunnart of Small-eyed Snake but these little chaps by a couple of high-pitched, sharp ‘pips’.
    [Show full text]