DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Appendix a Table A-1. Recreation Use Attainment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AMS/2020-MULBAC-3 Loading Analysis Plan – Recreation/E. coli TMDLs in Selected Watersheds October 2020 Around the State of Ohio Appendix A Table A-1. Recreation use attainment information for impaired sampling locations for each watershed assessment unit (WAU) as per 8-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) River Drainage Sample # of Geo Max WAU1 Station ID Stream Name Mile Area Year Samples Mean Value Lake Erie Basin Ottawa-Stony (04100001) 03-01 301449 Silver Creek 1.7 5.7 2011 5 704 5200 03-02 301448 Halfway Creek 4.88 22.1 2011 5 287 1800 03-03 301447 Prairie Ditch 1.41 16.9 2011 5 190 510 03-04 P11K65 Tenmile Creek 9.17 43 2011 5 416 1100 03-05 P11S77 North Tenmile Creek 0.12 42.1 2011 5 168 1700 03-06 P11K63 Tenmile Creek 0.47 81 2011 5 316 2800 03-07 301441 Ottawa River 16.84 127.6 2011 5 315 2000 03-08 P11S74 Ottawa River 11.15 155 2011 12 686 6000 Raisin (04100002) 03-04 301452 Bear Creek 8.44 22.9 2011 5 450 1400 Saint Marys (04100004) 01-01 303063 Muddy Creek 0.45 15.6 2015 6 634 2590 01-02 303024 Center Branch 0.34 28.7 2015 6 353 2030 01-03 303025 East Branch 0.27 37.1 2015 6 714 2420 01-04 P01K29 Kopp Creek 0.8 28 2015 6 721 3110 01-05 303068 Sixmile Creek 1.06 16.2 2015 6 574 1990 01-06 510020 Saint Marys River 95.12 106 2015 6 310 4321 02-01 303073 Hussey Creek 0.1 11.3 2015 6 509 1050 02-03 P01K21 Blierdofer Ditch 1.7 10.5 2015 6 1541 4620 02-04 P01S01 Twelvemile Creek 0.7 37.5 2015 6 211 461 02-05 P01S08 Saint Marys River 75.07 184 2015 6 314 649 03-01 303080 Little Black 1 23.6 2015 6 1044 2930 03-02 P01S02 Black Creek 0.9 54 2015 6 515 4370 03-03 P01K02 Saint Marys 52.13 303 2015 6 312 2710 03-04 303087 Duck Creek 1.05 15.6 2015 6 421 6150 03-05 303089 Saint Marys River (Willshire WWTP) 43.12 388.2 2015 6 2740 39700 04-01 P01K12 Twentyseven Mile Creek 1.2 28.2 2015 6 663 2790 Auglaize (04100007) 02-04 P03S10 Sixmile Creek (Spencerville WWTP) 3.59 3 2015 2 221 978 06-01 302567 Kyle Prairie Creek 0.2 15.9 2014 5 1250 6100 06-02 P02S25 Little Auglaize River 47 31.8 2014 5 475 3000 06-03 P02S35 Little Auglaize River 38.26 61 2014 5 405 3000 06-04 204284 Little Auglaize River 12.65 120 2014 5 412 4200 07-01 P02K04 Hagerman Creek 0.86 16.2 2014 5 379 3600 07-02 302554 West Branch Prairie Creek 0.6 49.7 2014 5 365 7800 08-02 302561 Town Creek 25.35 16.3 2014 5 841 2400 08-03 302559 Maddox Creek 0.9 32.7 2014 5 660 9000 1 While WAUs are equivalent to the USGS HUC-12 subwatershed classification, only the portion of the HUC-12 that lies within Ohio will be addressed by this TMDL. 1 AMS/2020-MULBAC-3 Loading Analysis Plan – Recreation/E. coli TMDLs in Selected Watersheds October 2020 Around the State of Ohio River Drainage Sample # of Geo Max WAU1 Station ID Stream Name Mile Area Year Samples Mean Value 08-04 P02W10 Town Creek 11.32 33.8 2014 5 2973 10000 10-01 302549 Upper Prairie Creek 0.9 8.8 2014 5 395 2000 10-02 P06K31 Blue Creek 29.43 15.9 2014 5 478 790 10-03 302547 Blue Creek 17.15 51.5 2014 5 214 1100 10-04 P06S02 Blue Creek 3.43 104 2014 5 193 780 10-05 302568 Bobenmyer Ditch 0.7 6.1 2014 5 180 1200 11-03 P06G14 Wagner Run 1.24 2.6 2008 2 7736 8800 12-01 302544 Flatrock Creek 48.3 13.4 2014 5 505 2400 12-05 P06S35 Flatrock Creek 23.72 145 2014 5 617 1500 12-06 P06S30 Flatrock Creek 6.02 189 2014 5 564 2500 12-07 302543 Little Flatrock Creek 1.53 17.8 2014 5 579 5600 12-08 302541 Sixmile Creek 3.9 9.7 2014 5 235 1800 12-09 P06K28 Eagle Creek 1.57 3.7 2014 5 2859 10000 Sandusky (04100011) 01-03 U05P05 Mills Creek 1.35 41 2009 8 646 2000 08-06 U03S02 Honey Creek 12.3 149 2012 2 693 10000 12-03 U04K01 Green Creek 5.06 78.3 2009 5 129 550 14-03 300676 Little Muddy Creek 2.5 25 2009 2 454 980 Huron-Vermilion (04100012) 01-03 Y01W05 Southwest Branch Vermillion River (Greenwich WWTP) 3.81 15 2015 2 1697 1800 02-04 501260 Vermilion River 6.32 262 2011 2 253 730 03-04 K01G31 Old Woman Creek 3.69 21.6 2011 2 282 570 Cuyahoga (04110002) 01-06 F01W77 Cuyahoga River 83.8 82.0 2017 6 399 224 02-01 3PH00059 Congress Lake Outlet (Randolph WWTP) 11.6 25.6 2015 2 729 960 02-02 200107 Breakneck Creek (Franklin Hills WWTP) 2.5 60.8 2015 4 500 1515 02-03 F01S19 Cuyahoga River 64.3 178 2015 1 3600 3600 Ashtabula -Chagrin (04110003) 01-01 301388 East Branch Ashtabula River 2.4 21 2011 12 1038 12000 01-02 A01K12 West Branch Ashtabula River 2.7 31 2011 12 614 17000 12000 01-03 301395 Ashtabula Creek 0.28 17.3 2011 12 697 0 01-04 A01K09 Ashtabula River 13.9 113 2011 5 277 570 01-05 301398 Ashtabula River 3.42 127 2011 12 1094 17000 Ohio River Basin Upper Ohio (05030101) East Branch Middle Fork Little Beaver Creek (Leetonia 04-01 201476 WWTP) 1.5 30 2015 2 294 300 04-04 3PK00016 Middle Fork Little Beaver Creek (Elkton WWTP) 8.3 125 2015 6 793 4200 05-02 3PH00043 West Fork Little Beaver Creek (Gilford Lake STP) 22.75 13 2015 2 1478 5200 05-04 3PB00070 West Fork Little Beaver Creek (Beaver Loc. WWTP) 0.6 111 2015 2 883 2000 06-02 201460 Honey Creek (Springfield Twp WWTP) 10 1.6 2015 2 790 1200 06-05 3PB00059 Bull Creek (New Waterford WWTP) 7 13.7 2015 2 561 700 06-06 L01P49 Leslie Run (East Palestine WWTP) 3.12 11.2 2011 3 210 494 06-10 602000 Little Beaver Creek 4.5 496 2015 1 6200 6200 07-03 C04K45 Upper North Fork 0.25 18.8 2005 4 377 840 08-01 C04K43 Town Fork 5.15 16.1 2005 3 188 640 2 AMS/2020-MULBAC-3 Loading Analysis Plan – Recreation/E. coli TMDLs in Selected Watersheds October 2020 Around the State of Ohio River Drainage Sample # of Geo Max WAU1 Station ID Stream Name Mile Area Year Samples Mean Value 08-03 3PB00026 North Fork Yellow Creek (Salineville WWTP) 10.3 26.4 2014 2 1136 1990 08-04 609260 Yellow Creek 2.51 224 2005 6 173 740 10-01 C04S06 Cross Creek 24.87 11.8 2010 6 361 670 10-02 203435 Salem Creek 0.28 15.3 2010 6 232 950 10-03 300813 Cross Creek 22.9 28.3 2010 12 1112 4000 10-04 C04S52 McIntyre Creek 0.18 24.4 2010 12 232 1200 10-05 C04S01 Cross Creek 4.15 117 2010 12 175 2200 Shenango (05030102) 01-04 N04K03 McMichael Creek 1.26 6.3 2008 5 361 1500 03-01 N04S02 Pymatuning Creek 24.5 35 2008 4 422 1600 03-02 N04S26 Pymatuning Creek 17.78 66 2008 5 138 200 03-03 N04S22 Pymatuning Creek 15.2 97 2008 5 202 1200 03-04 N04S01 Pymatuning Creek 8.4 135 2008 5 819 3500 06-01 N04S33 Yankee Creek 0.3 45.7 2009 2 315 330 06-02 N04W06 Little Yankee Creek 1.58 41.2 2008 5 209 6500 Mahoning (05030103) 05-01 302289 Mosquito Creek 29.4 12.2 2013 4 215 370 05-02 N03W16 Mosquito Creek 24.4 26.4 2013 4 527 740 05-03 N03S48 Mosquito Creek 0.25 138 2013 11 211 460 06-01 N03P02 Duck Creek 0.11 33.1 2013 11 345 700 06-02 302308 Mud Creek 0.7 13.1 2013 6 336 640 06-03 302311 Tributary to Mahoning River 0.6 11.3 2013 6 1732 5500 07-01 301464 Meander Creek 17.21 7.3 2011 4 412 760 07-02 N03W17 Meander Creek 10.63 39.9 2013 10 233 610 07-03 602380 Meander Creek 0.76 85.6 2013 10 198 670 07-05 302315 Little Squaw Creek 0.37 5.3 2012 3 69 627 08-01 N03S06 Mill Creek 9.5 34.5 2013 6 1138 5200 08-02 N03S11 Indian Run 0.33 14.4 2013 6 1942 3900 08-03 N03S02 Mill Creek 1.07 76.8 2013 11 203 2400 08-04 302156 Crab Creek 0.72 20.4 2013 11 371 5500 08-05 301407 Yellow Creek 11.4 10.1 2016 4 405 830 08-06 N03S18 Yellow Creek 0.4 39.3 2013 11 193 1000 08-07 N03K34 Dry Run 0.6 9.8 2013 6 393 2200 Upper Ohio-Wheeling (05030106) 02-02 C03S08 Middle Fork Short Creek 0.23 24 2010 6 441 2700 02-03 301055 North Fork Short Creek 0.09 22.1 2010 6 462 640 02-04 C03K02 Piney Fork 0.35 22.4 2010 6 466 2300 02-05 C03W07 Short Creek 8.84 87 2010 6 287 1100 02-07 609240 Short Creek 4.96 123 2010 11 240 970 03-01 C03L05 Crabapple Creek 0.16 19.6 2010 11 218 520 03-02 300817 Wheeling Creek 22.73 24.2 2010 11 478 5800 03-03 C03W15 Wheeling Creek 10.99 82.1 2010 6 283 3000 03-04 C03S18 Wheeling Creek 5.05 97.6 2010 11 207 1800 07-02 300642 McMahon Creek 17.6 29.3 2009 6 253 660 09-01 C02S56 North Fork Captina Creek 5.28 12.7 2013 4 332 750 09-02 302375 South Fork Captina Creek 11.4 3.5 2013 3 203 330 09-03 0PB00001 Bend Fork (Bethesda WWTP) 11.85 2.7 2015 2 425 456 3 AMS/2020-MULBAC-3 Loading Analysis Plan – Recreation/E.
Recommended publications
  • Page 1 03089500 Mill Creek Near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale C

    Page 1 03089500 Mill Creek Near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale C

    Table 2-1. Basin characteristics determined for selected streamgages in Ohio and adjacent States. [Characteristics listed in this table are described in detail in the text portion of appendix 2; column headings used in this table are shown in parentheses adjacent to the bolded long variable names] Station number Station name DASS Latc Longc SL10-85 LFPath SVI Agric Imperv OpenWater W 03089500 Mill Creek near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale Creek near Pricetown, Ohio 21.68 41.0908 81.0409 14.09 12.88 0.8076 40.46 1.08 0.48 2.31 03092090 West Branch Mahoning River near Ravenna, Ohio 21.81 41.2084 81.1983 20.23 11.19 0.5068 38.65 2.35 1.01 2.51 03102950 Pymatuning Creek at Kinsman, Ohio 96.62 41.4985 80.6401 5.46 21.10 0.6267 52.26 0.82 1.18 5.60 03109500 Little Beaver Creek near East Liverpool, Ohio 495.57 40.8103 80.6732 7.89 55.27 0.4812 38.05 1.98 0.79 1.41 03110000 Yellow Creek near Hammondsville, Ohio 147.22 40.5091 80.8855 9.37 33.62 0.5439 19.84 0.34 0.33 0.36 03111500 Short Creek near Dillonvale, Ohio 122.95 40.2454 80.8859 15.25 27.26 0.3795 30.19 1.08 0.93 1.16 03111548 Wheeling Creek below Blaine, Ohio 97.60 40.1274 80.9477 13.43 27.46 0.3280 40.92 0.97 0.56 0.64 03114000 Captina Creek at Armstrongs Mills, Ohio 133.69 39.9307 81.0696 13.56 26.99 0.6797 32.76 0.54 0.64 0.66 03115400 Little Muskingum River at Bloomfield, Ohio 209.94 39.6699 81.1370 5.50 44.84 0.7516 10.00 0.25 0.12 0.12 03115500 Little Muskingum River at Fay, Ohio 258.25 39.6406 81.1531 4.32 60.10 0.7834
  • Archaeological Modeling Study

    Archaeological Modeling Study

    Draft Report Archaeological Modeling for Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02) G R AY & PA P E , I N C. ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORY HISTORIC PRESERVATION January 14, 2009 Submitted for: ENTRAN 1848 Summit Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Submitted by: Gray & Pape, Inc. 1318 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Gray & Pape Project No. 08-11401 Project No. 08-11401 Archaeological Modeling for Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02) Submitted to: ENTRAN 1848 Summit Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 (513) 761-1700 Contact: Deb Osborne Submitted by: Michael Striker, M.A., RPA Gray & Pape, Inc. 1318 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Tel: (513) 287-7700 __________________________ W. Kevin Pape Project Manager January 14, 2009 ABSTRACT Under contract to ENTRAN, Gray & Pape, Inc. has prepared recommendations concerning the archaeological potential of Segment II/III of the Eastern Corridor Multimodal Projects (HAM-SR32-0.00, PID 22970; FHWA-OH-EIS-04-02), located in Hamilton and Clermont Counties, Ohio. The recommendations are based on a model developed by Gray & Pape, Inc. using the results of previous work conducted for the project (Weed 2002), documentary research, interviews with landowners and other knowledgeable parties, and an informal reconnaissance of the project area. Gray & Pape, Inc. divided the project area into three zones: Zone 1 is the undeveloped floodplains and terraces of the Little Miami River. Zone 2 includes floodplains and terraces that have been developed in historical times, and Zone 3 includes the valley and uplands east of the Village of Newtown.
  • FLOOD of AUGUST 1935 Dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER Z < 5

    FLOOD of AUGUST 1935 Dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER Z < 5

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 869 FLOOD OF AUGUST 1935 dtf MUSKINGUM RIVER o O z < 5 BY i ;> ^, C. V. YOUNGQUIST AND W. B. WITH SECTIONS ON THE ASSOCIATES METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOOT ^ ;j . » BY * V WALDO E. SMITH AND A. K. SHOWALTEK 2. Prepared in cooperation with the * ^* FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRAflCg^ OF PUBLIC WORKS ' -o j; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 jFor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. G. - * * « Price 40 cents (paper) CONTENTS Pag« Abstract---.--_-_-__-__-___--______.-__-_---_---_-__-_--_-__-.-_._ I Introduction.______________________________________________________ 1 Administration and personnel---_______--_-_____-__--____________-__ 3 Acknowledgments ________-________-----_--__--__-_________________ 3 Geography _ ____________________________________________________ 6 Topography, drainage, and transportation________________________ 6 Rainfall...--_---.-__-------.-_--------__..---_-----------_---- 7 Population, industry, and mineral resources_---_-__--_________--__ 8 Flood control-___-_-___-__-_-__-____-_--_-_-__--_--__.____--_- S General features of the flood-_______________________________________ 9 Damage.-__-_______--____-__--__--__-_-____--_______-____--__ IT Meteorologic and hydrologic conditions, by Waldo E. Smith____________ 19 General features of the storm.___-____-__________---_____--__--_ 19 Records of precipitation._______________________________________ 21 Antecedent
  • Stillwater River Opportunities for Recreation, from Kayaking and Canoeing to Fishing and Wildlife Watching

    Stillwater River Opportunities for Recreation, from Kayaking and Canoeing to Fishing and Wildlife Watching

    Our rivers and streams offer wonderful Stillwater River opportunities for recreation, from kayaking and canoeing to fishing and wildlife watching. But it’s important to learn how to enjoy them safely. Review the information on the reverse side to make sure your next outing on the Stillwater River is a safe and fun adventure. HARDIN AUGLAIZE MERCER A N O The Great Miami River Watershed A I I H D O LOGAN N I SHELBY S T I L L W A T E R R E R I V V TOLEDO E I R CLEVELAND DARKE R CHAMPAIGN I M MIAMI A I M SW 65.0 T R A E E V I CLARK R R G A D SW 63.0 M MONTGOMERY DAYTON PREBLE SW 61.0 COLUMBUS GREENE R E V I R I M I A CINCINNATI M T A E BUTLER R SW 57.0 G WARREN SW 59.0 HAMILTON OHIO KENTUCKY SW 55.0 SW 53.7 SW 49.0 SW 53.0 SW 47.0 SW 45.0 SW 43.0 SW 51.0 SW 38.6 SW 41.0 SW 37.5 SW 35.0 SW 35.9 GC 27.0 GC 25.0 SW 32.4 GC 20.8 GC 13.7 GC 21.3 GC 13.0 GC 03.0 SW 32.3 GC GC 11.0 GC 09.0 GC 05.0 GC 23.6 GC 21.3 GC 19.5 GC 13.7 06.2 GC 01.7 SW 31.2 GC 15.0 GC 07.0 GC 01.6 GC 21.6 GC 17.0 SW 30.5 SW 29.4 SW 27.6 SW 27.0 SW 25.0 MAP SYMBOLS SW 23.3 SW 23.4 Ohio State Routes Brukner SW 21.5 Nature Center SW Stillwater River U.S.
  • Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002

    Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002

    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002 March 25, 2002 prepared by Division of Surface Water Division of Surface Water, 122 South Front St., PO Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 Introduction Federal Water Quality Standard (WQS) program regulations require that States adopt and use an antidegradation policy. The policy has two distinct purposes. First, an antidegradation policy must provide a systematic and reasoned decision making process to evaluate the need to lower water quality. Regulated activities should not lower water quality unless the need to do so is demonstrated based on technical, social and economic criteria. The second purpose of an antidegradation policy is to ensure that the State’s highest quality streams, rivers and lakes are preserved. This document deals with the latter aspect of the antidegradation policy. Section 6111.12(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code specifically requires that the Ohio EPA establish provisions “ensuring that waters of exceptional recreational and ecological value are maintained as high quality resources for future generations.” Table 1 explains the proposed classification system to accomplish this directive. The shaded categories denote the special higher resource quality categories. The proposed rule contains 157 stream segments classified as either State Resource Waters (SRW) or Superior High Quality Waters (SHQW). The approximate mileage in each classification is shown in Table 1. The total mileage in both classifications represents less than four percent of Ohio’s streams. Refer to “Methods and Documentation Used to Propose State Resource Water and Superior High Quality Water Classifications for Ohio’s Water Quality Standards” (Ohio EPA, 2002) for further information about the process used to develop the list of streams.
  • Evaluating Beneficial Use: Recreation

    Evaluating Beneficial Use: Recreation

    Ohio 2010 Integrated Report Section F Evaluating Beneficial Use: Recreation F1. Background Prior to the 2002 Integrated Report (IR), the reporting of recreation use impairment in Ohio was sporadic. Section 305(b) reports (1998 and earlier) may have included an indication of the potential for recreation use impairment in various streams, but a cohesive listing was not presented. The 2002 IR employed a uniform methodology to examine readily available data on fecal coliform counts. This approach was based on counting the number of exceedances of the secondary contact recreation use maximum criterion [5000 colony forming units (cfu)/100 ml fecal coliform or 576 cfu/100 ml Escherichia coli (E. coli)]. Any assessment unit with five or more samples over the last five years above these values was listed as having an impaired recreation use. The 2004 IR adopted a more statistically robust methodology for assessing the recreation use attainment of the State’s surface waters linked more directly to the applicable water quality standards. The methodology adopted in 2004 continued to be used through the 2008 IR. The 2008 IR also included a preview of changes anticipated at the time for the 2010 report based on the expectation that the watershed assessment unit (WAU) would change from a larger watershed size (11-digit hydrologic unit) to a smaller watershed size (12-digit hydrologic unit) and on four anticipated revisions to the water quality standards: 1) dropping the fecal coliform criteria; 2) creation of a tiered set of classes of primary contact recreation waters based on recreation use intensity; 3) revision of the geometric mean averaging period; and 4) extension of the recreation season.
  • Appendix A. Darke County

    Appendix A. Darke County

    MIAMI VALLEY REGION AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix A. Darke County A.1 DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Darke County is located in the northwest portion of the Miami Valley Region as shown in Figure A-1 and encompasses approximately 600 square miles, or 26% of the planning area. Figure A-1. Darke County Location Map Land use within Darke County is predominately rural, with over 80% of the land used for agricultural production. Darke County has the second highest concentration of animal feeding operations (AFOs) in Ohio. The County is characterized by small villages and wide open spaces. There are also several natural open spaces along stream corridors designated for recreational use and wildlife preservation. A.1.1 Communities in Darke County Although Darke County includes several communities, it is not heavily populated. The most recent 20-year projections indicate that the population in Darke is expected to remain constant. Although the population projections indicate overall growth in Darke County over the next 20 years, the population within the Stillwater River watershed in the county is not anticipated to change significantly. The administrative boundaries within this area are listed in Table A-1. Table A-1. Administrative Boundaries within Darke County Townships Incorporated Communities Adams Neave Liberty Ansonia Greenville Versailles Allen Patterson Mississinawa Arcanum North Star Wayne Lakes Brown Richland Wayne Bradford (portion) Osgood Yorkshire Franklin Van Buren York Burkettsville/New Weston Rossburg Greenville Wabash Washington Gettysburg Union City Jackson 74 MIAMI VALLEY REGION AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Watershed groups that are active in Darke County are listed in Table A-2.
  • East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio

    East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio

    25 February 1971 ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT East Fork Lake East Fork Little Miami River, Ohio Prepared by U. S. Army Engineer District, Louisville Louisville, Kentucky DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOUISVILLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P O BOX 5 9 LOUISVILLE KENTUCKY 40201 25 February 1971 Revised 26 March 1971 SUMMARY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT EAST FORK LAKE EAST FORK MIAMI RIVER, OHIO 1. Coordination With Other Agencies. Date of Date of AGENCY Request Comment s Soil Conservation Service USDA 9 Oct 1970 27 Oct 1970 Federal Water Quality Administration, EPA 9 Oct 1970 4 Jan 1971 Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wild­ life, USD I 9 Oct 1970 28 Oct 1970 Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, USDI 9 Oct 1970 No comments received National Park Service, USDI 10 Sept 1970 22 Sept 1970 9 Oct 1970 Ohio Department of Natural Resources 9 Oct 1970 23 Nov 1970 Ohio Planning and Development Clearinghouse 14 Oct 1970 23 Nov 1970 Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Planning Authority (Comments furnished by Clermont County Planning Commission at request of O-K-I) 14 Oct 1970 16 Nov 1970 ORLPD-F East Fork Miami River, Ohio 2 * Environmental Impacts. Approximately 10,600 acres of land will be required for the project, with 2,160 acres of water surface at seasonal pool elevation. The ecology of the area would be modified to adjust to the slack water impoundment. Environment downstream would be enhanced by flood control, water quality control, and water supply. Agricultural lands will be inundated. Urbanization of the area can be expected to increase rapidly. 3 * Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided.
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land

    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land

    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ADAMS 242 - XXX D ELLISON MEMORIAL PARK VILLAGE OF PEEBLES $74,000.00 C 3/7/1973 12/31/1975 2 ADAMS County Total: $74,000.00 County Count: 1 ALLEN 580 - XXX A STRAYER WOODS ACQUISITION JOHNNY APPLESEED METRO PARK DIST. $111,500.00 C 12/6/1977 12/31/1979 4 819 - XXX D OTTAWA RIVER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LIMA $45,045.00 C 3/21/1980 12/31/1984 4 913 - XXX D VILLAGE PARK VILLAGE OF SPENCERVILLE $11,265.00 C 7/28/1981 12/31/1986 4 ALLEN County Total: $167,810.00 County Count: 3 ASHLAND 93 - XXX D MOHICAN STATE PARK SWIMMING POOL DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES $102,831.30 C 4/23/1971 6/30/1972 16 463 - XXX D MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CITY OF ASHLAND $144,615.70 C 4/7/1976 12/31/1978 16 573 - XXX A BROOKSIDE PARK EXPANSION CITY OF ASHLAND $45,325.00 C 11/10/1977 12/31/1979 16 742 - XXX D LEWIS MEMORIAL TENNIS COURTS VILLAGE OF JEROMESVILLE $4,715.00 C 5/2/1979 12/31/1983 16 807 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK CITY OF ASHLAND $200,300.00 C 7/14/1980 12/31/1985 16 953 - XXX D BROOKSIDE PARK III CITY OF ASHLAND $269,669.98 C 6/14/1983 12/31/1988 16 1159 - XXX D BROOKSIDE WEST CITY OF ASHLAND $154,500.00 C 7/11/1990 12/31/1995 16 ASHLAND County Total: $921,956.98 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Ohio - 39 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
  • Along the Ohio Trail

    Along the Ohio Trail

    Along The Ohio Trail A Short History of Ohio Lands Dear Ohioan, Meet Simon, your trail guide through Ohio’s history! As the 17th state in the Union, Ohio has a unique history that I hope you will find interesting and worth exploring. As you read Along the Ohio Trail, you will learn about Ohio’s geography, what the first Ohioan’s were like, how Ohio was discovered, and other fun facts that made Ohio the place you call home. Enjoy the adventure in learning more about our great state! Sincerely, Keith Faber Ohio Auditor of State Along the Ohio Trail Table of Contents page Ohio Geography . .1 Prehistoric Ohio . .8 Native Americans, Explorers, and Traders . .17 Ohio Land Claims 1770-1785 . .27 The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 . .37 Settling the Ohio Lands 1787-1800 . .42 Ohio Statehood 1800-1812 . .61 Ohio and the Nation 1800-1900 . .73 Ohio’s Lands Today . .81 The Origin of Ohio’s County Names . .82 Bibliography . .85 Glossary . .86 Additional Reading . .88 Did you know that Ohio is Hi! I’m Simon and almost the same distance I’ll be your trail across as it is up and down guide as we learn (about 200 miles)? Our about the land we call Ohio. state is shaped in an unusual way. Some people think it looks like a flag waving in the wind. Others say it looks like a heart. The shape is mostly caused by the Ohio River on the east and south and Lake Erie in the north. It is the 35th largest state in the U.S.
  • Section L4. Section 303(D) List of Prioritized Impaired Waters Assessment Sq

    Section L4. Section 303(D) List of Prioritized Impaired Waters Assessment Sq

    Section L4. Section 303(d) List of Prioritized Impaired Waters Assessment Sq. Mi. Human Recre- Aquatic PDW Priority Next Field Projected Unit Assessment Unit Name in Ohio Health ation Life Supply Points Monitoring TMDL 04100011 90 02 Sandusky River Mainstem (Wolf Creek to Sandusky Bay) 1420 5 5 5 5 16 2024 2014 04100007 03 05 Lost Creek 17.41 1 5 5 5 15 2025 2014 04100009 90 01 Maumee River Mainstem (Tiffin River to Beaver Creek) 6058 5 5 5 5h 15 2027 2015 04100005 90 01 Maumee River Mainstem (IN border to Tiffin River) 2315 5 5 1 5h 13 2027 2015 Mahoning River Mainstem (Eagle Creek to Pennsylvania 5 5 5 0 05030103 90 01 Border) 1075 13 2013 2016 05090202 10 06 Glady Creek-East Fork Little Miami River 41.44 1h 5 5 5 13 2027 2015 04100012 02 04 Mouth Vermilion River 28.13 5h 5 5h 0 12 2021 2024 04110001 02 03 Rocky River 25.34 5h 5 5 0 12 2014 2017 05090202 11 02 Fivemile Creek-East Fork Little Miami River 42.56 1h 5 5 5 12 2027 2015 05040001 06 07 Beal Run-Sandy Creek 22.85 5 5 5 0 11 2025 2016 05060001 04 06 Glade Run-Scioto River 38.34 5h 5 5 0 11 2024 2014 04100007 04 02 Dug Run-Ottawa River 28.04 5h 5 5 3i 10 2025 2014 04110003 01 05 Lower Ashtabula River 18.27 5 5 5 0 10 2026 2015 05040002 02 01 Village of Pavonia-Black Fork Mohican River 31.94 5h 5 5 0 10 2023 2014 05040003 03 04 Delano Run-Kokosing River 32.95 3i 5h 5 0 10 2022 2015 05040003 07 05 Shrimplin Creek-Killbuck Creek 47.56 3 5 5 0 10 2024 2015 05080001 90 01 Great Miami River Mainstem (Tawawa Creek to Mad River) 1853 5 5 5 3i 10 2024 2027 05080002 07 04 Dicks Creek 27.71
  • Download Stillwater River Water Trail

    Download Stillwater River Water Trail

    Stillwater River Water Trail Our rivers and streams offer wonderful opportunities for recreation, from kayaking and canoeing to fishing and wildlife watching. But it’s important to learn how to enjoy them safely. Review the information on the reverse side to make sure your next outing on the Stillwater River Water Trail is a safe and fun adventure. SW 65.0 SW 63.0 SW 61.0 SW 57.0 SW 59.0 SW 55.0 Coming Soon SW 53.7 SW 49.0 SW 53.0 SW 47.0 SW 45.0 SW 43.0 SW 51.0 SW 38.6 SW 41.0 SW 37.5 SW 35.0 SW 35.9 GC 27.0 GC 25.0 SW 32.4 GC 21.3 GC 20.8 GC 03.0 GC 13.7 GC 13.7 SW 32.0 SW 32.5 GC GC 05.0 GC 23.6 GC 19.5 11.0 GC 09.0 GC 06.2 GC 01.7 GC 21.3 GC 13.0 GC 15.0 SW 31.2 GC 07.0 GC 01.6 GC 21.6 GC 17.0 SW 30.5 SW 29.4 SW 27.6 SW 27.0 SW 25.0 SW 23.3 SW 23.4 SW 21.5 LC 01.0 Map Legend LC 13.0 SW 21.0 LC 03.0 LC 01.2 Roadside N 39˚ 59’ 53” Parking LC 09.0 W 84˚ 20’ 15” River Miles MCD LC 11.0 LC 05.0 Water Trail Access Parking Lot Flood Control Dam River Miles Restrooms Low Dams LC 07.0 No Access Drinking Water Ohio State Routes SW Stillwater River SW 17.4 GC Greenville Creek Picnic Area U.S.