Online Communities for People Who Stutter: an Ethnographic Study of a Facebook Social Networking Support Group Erik X

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Online Communities for People Who Stutter: an Ethnographic Study of a Facebook Social Networking Support Group Erik X Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2015 Online Communities For People Who Stutter: An Ethnographic Study Of A Facebook Social Networking Support Group Erik X. Raj Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Recommended Citation Raj, Erik X., "Online Communities For People Who Stutter: An Ethnographic Study Of A Facebook Social Networking Support Group" (2015). Wayne State University Dissertations. Paper 1163. This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. ONLINE COMMUNITIES FOR PEOPLE WHO STUTTER: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF A FACEBOOK SOCIAL NETWORKING SUPPORT GROUP by ERIK X. RAJ DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2015 MAJOR: COMMUNICATIONS SCIENCES AND DISORDERS Approved By: ______________________________________ Advisor Date ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ © COPYRIGHT BY ERIK X. RAJ 2015 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my wife, Natalie Dallavalle, and people who stutter. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the result of the support, guidance, and encouragement of many individuals. I would like to thank the 9 participants who were members of the stuttering support Facebook group that was created. I appreciate your willingness to be a part of this study. The words that you all have shared have truly shed new light on the power of digitally connecting with one another to share thoughts, feelings, experiences, and information about stuttering. Thank you to my committee members: Dr. Derek Daniels, Dr. Shelly Jo Kraft, Dr. Michael Barbour, Dr. Gregory Zvric, and Mrs. Jessica Killenberg-Muzik. You provided me with an insurmountable amount of feedback and brilliant comments that have helped to sculpt this dissertation. Also, a special thank you to my advisor, Dr. Derek Daniels: Your knowledge and friendship have helped me to grow as a speech-language pathologist and a research scientist. You have inspired me in so many ways, and I look forward to future collaborations. I send thanks to the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Wayne State University for providing me with the Graduate Student Scholarship during my years of academic study. I would also like to thank the American Speech-Language- Hearing Foundation for awarding me the Graduate Student Scholarship during my last year of doctoral studies. To my family and to my wife, Natalie Dallavalle, thank you for your never-ending love and support through the years. iii Finally, I would like to send thanks to four individuals from Misericordia University who have continued to encourage me throughout my post-masters education: Drs. Glen Tellis, Cari Tellis, Hunter Manasco, and Mrs. Lori Cimino. Misericordia University has, without a doubt, set the foundation for who I am today as a speech-language pathologist. Without the four of you, I would not be here today. You rock! iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication .......................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... x List of Figures ................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 Definition of Terms................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 2: Review of Literature ................................................................................... 10 Stuttering as a Multidimensional Disorder ........................................................... 10 Overt Aspects of Stuttering ....................................................................... 11 Covert Aspects of Stuttering ..................................................................... 13 Openly Talking About Talking ............................................................................. 16 Psychosocial Aspects of Stuttering ....................................................................... 17 The Legitimacy of Psychosocial Evidence ............................................... 22 Support Group Environments ............................................................................... 24 Online Support Environments Unrelated to Communication Difficulties ................................................................................................ 25 Online Support Environments Related to Communication Difficulties ................................................................................................ 27 An Inside Look at Social Networking Sites Today .............................................. 31 Digital Sharing Online for People Who Stutter .................................................... 34 Web 1.0 Digital Sharing Before the Year 2000 ........................................ 35 v Web 2.0 Digital Sharing After the Year 2000 .......................................... 38 Benefits Associated With Digital Sharing Via Social Networking Sites ............. 41 Challenges Associated With Digital Sharing Via Social Networking Sites ......... 45 Statement of the Problem ...................................................................................... 47 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................... 48 Research Questions ............................................................................................... 48 Chapter 3: Method .......................................................................................................... 50 Overview of Methodology .................................................................................... 50 Development of the Participant Site Selection ..................................................... 52 Participants Recruited for the Study ..................................................................... 60 Data Collection Methods ...................................................................................... 62 Data Analysis Methods ......................................................................................... 67 Credibility and Trustworthiness (Validity and Reliability) .................................. 70 Ethical Framework ................................................................................................ 73 Significance of Study ............................................................................................ 73 Subjectivity Statement .......................................................................................... 74 Chapter 4: Results........................................................................................................... 76 Themes Related to Benefits .................................................................................. 78 Sense of Family......................................................................................... 78 Feelings of Safety and Acceptance ........................................................... 78 Thought-Provoking ................................................................................... 79 Convenience Through Accessibility ......................................................... 80 vi Supplemental............................................................................................. 80 Themes Related to Challenges .............................................................................. 81 Limited Number of Members ................................................................... 81 Sense of Disconnect .................................................................................. 82 Fear of Misinterpretations ......................................................................... 82 Lack of Instantaneous Communication .................................................... 83 Lack of Any Responses to a Question ...................................................... 83 Themes Related to Support Through Providing Information ............................... 85 Upcoming Meetings .................................................................................. 85 Internet Articles ........................................................................................ 87 Themes Related to Support Through Posing Questions ....................................... 91 Weekly Conversation Starters................................................................... 91 Social Gathering Questions....................................................................... 92 Themes Related to Support Through Giving Encouragement .............................. 93 Text-Based ................................................................................................ 93 Like Button-Based ...................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Exploring the Portrayal of Stuttering in It (2017)
    POSTS AND G-G-GHOSTS: EXPLORING THE PORTRAYAL OF STUTTERING IN IT (2017) A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication, Culture, and Technology By Mary-Cecile Gayoso, B. A Washington, D.C. April 13, 2018 Copyright 2018 by Mary-Cecile Gayoso All Rights Reserved ii Dedication The research and writing of this thesis is dedicated to my parents and the name they gave me MY PARENTS, for always listening, for loving me and all my imperfections, and for encouraging me to speak my mind always MY NAME, for being simultaneously the bane and joy of my existence, and for connecting me to my Mamaw and to the Grandfather I never knew Thank you, I love you, Mary-Cecile iii Acknowledgements “One of the hardest things in life is having words in your heart that you can't utter.” - James Earl Jones This thesis would not have been possible without those that are part of my everyday life and those that I have not spoken to or seen in years. To my family: Thank you for your constant support and encouragement, for letting me ramble about my thesis during many of our phone calls. To my mother, thank you for sending me links about stuttering whenever you happened upon a news article or story. To my father, thank you for introducing me to M*A*S*H as a kid and to one of the most positive representations of stuttering in media I’ve seen.
    [Show full text]
  • What Stuttering Treatments Are Effective?
    WHAT STUTTERING TREATMENTS ARE EFFECTIVE? An evidence-based review of more than 200 scientific studies. Thomas David Kehoe Owner, Casa Futura Technologies Member, American Speech-Language Hearing Association This e-book can be downloaded free from http://www.casafuturatech.com/stuttering-e-book Last update: 2013 July 4 Because this e-book may be updated at any time, don’t copy or forward it to your friends. Instead, send them the link to download their own copy. Copyright (C) 2012, 2013 Thomas David Kehoe How to contact the author: [email protected] Casa Futura Technologies 720 31ST ST BOULDER, CO 80303-2402 USA This e-book is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modi- fy it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as pub- lished by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This e-book is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but without any warranty; without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. See the GNU General Public License for more details. For a copy of the GNU General Public License see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/. TABLE OF CONTENTS HOW MORE THAN 200 STUDIES WERE REVIEWED ..................... 1 Trial Quality Standards ................................................................................ 2 Treatment Outcomes .................................................................................... 3 PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae (Revised January, 2017)
    Curriculum Vitae (Revised January, 2017) INFORMATION Name: J. Scott Yaruss Birth Date: December 1, 1967 Citizenship: USA Address: 6035 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh PA 15260 Phone: (412) 383-6538 Email: [email protected] Fax: (412) 383-6555 University of Pittsburgh: www.shrs.pitt.edu/jsyaruss Seminars and consulting services: www.yaruss.com Books, testing materials, and resources: www.StutteringTherapyResources.com EDUCATION AND TRAINING 1985 – 1989 University of California B.A. (1989) Linguistics (high honors) Berkeley, CA Psychology (highest honors) 1989 – 1991 Syracuse (NY) University M.S. (1991) Speech-Language Pathology 1991 – 1994 Syracuse (NY) University Ph.D. (1994) Speech-Language Pathology APPOINTMENTS AND POSITIONS Academic/Clinical Positions 1988 – 1989 Project on Linguistic Analysis Research Assistant University of California, Berkeley 1991 – 1994 Communication Science & Disorders Research Assistant, Syracuse University, Syracuse NY Clinical Supervisor 1994 – 1998 Communication Disorders Assistant Professor Northwestern University, Evanston, IL Director, Stuttering Research 2010 – 2012 Steinhart School of Culture, Education, Adjunct Associate Professor & Human Development, New York University 1998 – present Stuttering Center of Western Pennsylvania Director / Founder 1998 – present Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology Clinical Research Consultant (1998-2007) Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) Associate Director (2007-2011) Coordinator of Clinical Research (2012-present) 1998 – present Communication Science and Disorders
    [Show full text]
  • The Perceptions of Adolescents Who Stutter Regarding Communication with Their Parents
    THE PERCEPTIONS OF ADOLESCENTS WHO STUTTER REGARDING COMMUNICATION WITH THEIR PARENTS Charles D. Hughes A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2011 Committee: Rodney Gabel, Advisor Jean M. Gerard Graduate Faculty Representative Alexander Goberman Roger Colcord Margaret Booth © 2011 Charles Hughes All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Rodney Gabel, Advisor This study used a mixed methods approach to explore the perceptions of adolescents who stutter (AWS) between the ages of 12 and 17 related to communication with parents and other significant people about stuttering. In addition, this study sought to better understand the relationship between general communication levels between AWS and their parents and how general communication was related to discussing stuttering. Participants took part in a semi-structured interview and completed the Communication about Stuttering Inventory (CASI) and the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS). Responses to these two questionnaires were used to supplement the thematic analysis for participants. Findings from the interviews revealed four major themes and ten minor themes. Major themes consisted of (1) discussions with parents; (2) decisions about speech therapy; (3) types of parental assistance; and (4) discussions with others. Minor themes were (1) preference to talk with mothers; (2) speech techniques and general information; (3) parents’ idea to begin speech therapy or (4) participants’ idea to begin speech therapy; (5) reminding to use techniques and providing advice; (6) practicing speech techniques together; (7) good listening skills and not interrupting; (8) not directly talked about with friends; (9) rarely discussed with siblings; and (10) sharing experiences with other family members who stutter.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuttering Research and Medical Updates
    Stuttering Research and Medical Updates QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS At the 2020 NSA@Home Conference, a panel of expert researchers, clinicians, and professors shared summaries of recent research in stuttering across a variety of topic areas (etiology, genetics, medical aspects, and therapy approaches). There were many questions from session attendees that the panelists didn’t have time to address. Below are answers to questions submitted in the chat box during the session. SESSION: Stuttering Research & Medical Updates DATE: July 9, 2020 Gerald Maguire, MD – University of California, Riverside Scott Yaruss, Ph. D. – Michigan State University PANELISTS: Shelly Jo Kraft, Ph.D. – Wayne State University Shahriar Sheikhbahei, Ph.D. – National Institute of Health Soo-Eun Chang, Ph.D. – University of Michigan Katie McCrary Question for the medical research panel, if time: Is there any new research on medications to reduce stuttering including the use of alprazolam (Xanax), propranolol or other anti-anxiety medications? Gerald Maguire We do have two new FDA registered research studies coming up—deutetrabenazine and ecopipam. These medications act on the naturally occurring brain chemical, dopamine. Alprazolam (Xanax) is in a class of medications known as benzodiazepines. These medications may assist with the social anxiety of stuttering and act on the neurochemical, GABA. Medications in this class have never been shown to directly help the fluency aspects of stuttering, unlike the dopamine medications. Also, the benzodiazepine medications can be addictive and habit forming unlike the dopamine medications that have been studied and have been shown to be effective in treating stuttering. More definitive studies are needed and are beginning this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuttering and Cluttering
    Stuttering and Cluttering Stuttering and Cluttering provides a comprehensive overview of both theor- etical and treatment aspects of disorders of fluency: stuttering (also known as stammering) and the lesser known cluttering. The book demonstrates how treatment strategies relate to the various theories as to why stuttering and cluttering arise, and how they develop. Uniquely, it outlines the major approaches to treatment alongside alternative methods, including drug treatment and recent auditory feedback procedures. Part 1 looks at different perspectives on causation and development, emphasizing that in many cases these apparently different approaches are inextricably intertwined. Part 2 covers the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of stuttering and cluttering. In addition to chapters on estab- lished approaches, there are sections on alternative therapies, including drug therapy, and auditory feedback, together with a chapter on counselling. Ref- erence is made to a number of established treatment programs, but the focus is on the more detailed description of specific landmark approaches. These provide a framework from which the reader may not only understand others’ treatment procedures, but also a perspective from which they can develop their own. Offering a clear, accessible and comprehensive account of both the theo- retical underpinning of stammering therapy and its practical implications, the book will be of interest to speech language therapy students, as well as quali- fied therapists, psychologists, and to those who stutter and clutter. David Ward is Director of the Speech Research Laboratory at the University of Reading, and a specialist fluency clinician within the NHS. He qualified as a speech language therapist in 1987, and later received an MA in linguistics and phonetics and a PhD in motor control and stuttering.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Children Who Stutter : a Survey of School-Based Clinicians
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research 2008 Management of children who stutter : a survey of school-based clinicians Megan Zaninovich Murphy San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Murphy, Megan Zaninovich, "Management of children who stutter : a survey of school-based clinicians" (2008). Master's Theses. 3611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.7q3w-k53d https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3611 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MANAGEMENT OF CHILDREN WHO STUTTER: A SURVEY OF SCHOOL-BASED CLINICIANS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Megan Zaninovich Murphy December 2008 UMI Number: 1463381 Copyright 2008 by Murphy, Megan Zaninovich All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract CULTURAL INFLUENCE on LISTENER RESPONSES TO
    Abstract CULTURAL INFLUENCE ON LISTENER RESPONSES TO STUTTERING by Jianliang Zhang April 2010 Chair: Joseph Kalinowski, Ph.D. Major Department: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders Stuttering is a developmental, involuntary, and intermittent fluency disorder. During moments of stuttering, people who stutter demonstrate sudden onsets and offsets of the aberrant struggling behaviors, with primary behaviors affecting mainly speech organs and secondary, ancillary behaviors affecting more distal body parts. Listeners generally respond to stuttering behaviors with negative emotional arousal that is manifested at behavioral, physiological, and emotional levels, and tend to attribute negative, stereotypical personality traits to people who stutter. These listener responses can be an important factor in the development and maintenance of stuttering. Therefore, the nature and properties of listener responses, e.g., the role of culture in shaping listener responses to stuttering, merit further examination. Culture refers to the characteristics of various groups of people relative to their material traits, social norms, beliefs, attitudes, and values. The value system is believed by many researchers to be the core of most cultural variations. Along with individual biological disposition, culture regulates how people perceive, explain, and respond to various phenomena. Numerous studies have converged to indicate significant contrasts between Easterners and Westerners in cognitions, emotions, and behaviors. In the United States, European-American and African-Americans also show differences in their value systems and many other aspects. The purpose of this dissertation was to investigate listener responses to stuttering in ethno-racially different groups. Specifically, the investigation focused on listeners‟ eye gaze responses and physiological responses when witnessing stuttering, and their perceptions toward people who stutter before and after observing stuttering.
    [Show full text]