DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporation Minutes 13 December 2016 MEETING of the CORPORATION of MACCLESFIELD COLLEGE TUESDAY 13 DECEMBER 2016 – 9.30 AM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corporation Minutes 13 December 2016 MEETING of the CORPORATION of MACCLESFIELD COLLEGE TUESDAY 13 DECEMBER 2016 – 9.30 AM MEETING OF THE CORPORATION OF MACCLESFIELD COLLEGE TUESDAY 13 DECEMBER 2016 – 9.30 AM BOARD ROOM – M219 PART I Clerk: Mrs R Clare Present: Mr Mark Sharples Chair Mrs M Grant Miss V Herbert Mrs R Kay Ms S Musgrave Prof A Sutcliffe Mrs C Trasler Dr K Williams Mr M Wright Mrs G Bell Miss S Simpson Miss A Sumner In attendance: Mrs G Lagan Mr P Sharples Mrs T Cosgrave (item 4 only) Mr R Hedge (item 3 only) MINUTES Item Title Action 46/16 Welcome and Apologies for Absence The Chair welcomed Members to the meeting. Apologies for absence were received for David Harrison, Jerry Green, Harold Davenport and Nigel Schofield. The Student Members of the Corporation were welcomed to their first meeting. 47/16 Declaration of Members’ Interest There were no declarations of Members’ interest. 48/16 The Macclesfield Academy The paper for The Macclesfield Academy was presented in advance of the meeting. Richard Hedge reported that the provisional progress 8 measures have been published by the DFE. The scores for Cheshire East were shared with the Members. The Academy is in joint 1st position. Cheshire East performance overall was disappointing. It was stated that the budget for 2016-17 is based on numbers in September 2015 which means that the Academy is currently teaching 90 unfunded students. Q: How are the new Governor arrangements working? The new governors attended their first meeting. One of the new governors attended the Corporation Minutes 13 December 2016 1 Academy this morning to familiarise himself with the Academy data. The next meeting is on Thursday of this week. The Academy is currently in discussions with other schools regarding forming a MAT. 49/16 Presentation from the Director of Commercial Services A presentation was provided by the Director of Commercial Services on Apprenticeships followed by a question and answers session. Members thanked the Director of Commercial Services for her informative presentation. 50/16 Minutes 4 October 2016 Gill Bell will be added to the attendance record and Valerie Herbert will be removed. RC Item 44/16 should read: The predictions made last year were higher than what the Academy actually achieved. The minutes will be updated and the Chair will sign the amended minutes. 51/16 Appointment of Student Member of the Corporation The President of the Student Union for 2016/17 was welcomed to the Corporation meeting. Sam Simpson introduced herself and stated that she is currently studying Level 3 Aero Engineering. Members approved the appointment of the Vice President of the Student Union for 2016/17. Ashleigh Sumner introduced herself and stated that she is currently studying Electrical Engineering and is based at the College one day a week. She is employed by Siemens. Corporation Minutes 13 December 2016 2 Item Title Action 52/16 KPIs 2015/16 and The Principal Report The KPIs for 2015/16 were presented by the Principal. The Principal highlighted a number of points: A number of the Apprenticeship TvA were red due to the high targers which were well above provider rate. The lesson observations for 2015/16 were at 75% for good or better. This was assessed by Ofsted at being the right level. In previous years there has previously been an over grading of lessons at the College. Q: From the report in June it was reported that retention dropped two months later. What reassurance can you give that this won’t happen again? The monitoring is now more rigorous. 60 high risk students have been identified and these students are being monitored closely and parents are involved at an early stage. Withdrawals are now monitored by the Vice Principal for Curriculum and Quality. The IAG is now more rigorous and the census data are better managed. There are now pre-meetings with Mary Grant and the Vice Principal of Curriculum and Quality to scrutinise the data. The meetings provide support and challenge. A Member commented on the excellent improvement to L3 vocational value added GL going up by 20%. A Member requested that line 6 ‘14/15 v 15/16’ column should be changed to RK red. KPIs 2016/17 The KPIs for 2016/17 were presented by the Principal. A target for HE Retention, Pass and Achievement will be added for the January meeting. GL Q: Maths and English is a risk. How are we monitoring this area? The Vice Principal for Curriculum and Quality has a meeting every two weeks to review maths and English. A more detailed report on maths and English will be GL presented at the spring Corporation meeting. A report on destination data will be provided at the spring Corporation PS/GL meeting. Q: A governor enquired about the target for the staff survey. The Principal explained that the engagement for the staff survey has been low. A note was going out on the staff payslips reminding staff to complete the staff survey. The staff survey will be launched next week. There has been a historic lack of confidence from staff on whether the individual results of the survey are confidential. ELT have asked staff if they would prefer the survey to be online or on paper but staff confirmed an online survey was preferable. Principal’s Report The Principal’s report was received in advance of the meeting. The following points were discussed: Three high profile joint-brand academies have been launched with Seddon, Siemens and Marshall Macclesfield College reached the final of the prestigious Education Investor Awards Macclesfield College performed well in the first ever rankings table published by FE Week An extra full staff development event was delivered on 1st September by keynote speaker Bradley Lightbody The College is fully prepared to implement the new GCSE grading scale from Corporation Minutes 13 December 2016 3 numbers 1 – 9 in 2017. A new Head of HE has been appointed The new Marketing Department has been established and two Open Evening Campaigns have been launched and completed The Principal reported that collaboration with the local schools has continued to be developed. The College has been better received since the removal of A Level provision. The College was invited to Fallibroome Academy for the first time An application to the LEP has been made The College is hosting Apprenticeship week and this is being sponsored by the Council There will be a new HE intake in January. A marketing campaign will be created to advertise the new offer. One of the courses will be for Teaching Assistants in schools. This is a course that employers are looking for and will help to recover some numbers A Governor commented on the positive appointment of a school liaison officer 53/16 Quality and Curriculum Report on achievement rates 2015-16 The Vice Principal for Curriculum and Quality provided an update on the achievement rates for 2015-16. The following points were made: The overall achievement rate for 2015-16 was 80% The most significant gain for the College was an increase of 5.1% in the 16- 18 achievement rate The pass rate for 2015-16 was 92.07% The main retention issue is on Level 3 Vocational programmes, where a significant number of Study Programmes are legacy 2 year programmes that started in 2014-15 Higher Education overall retention, pass and achievement rates show a three year improvement trend. A governor commented on the data sheet attached within the paper as it easily identified the strengths and weaknesses. A governor raised that functional skills remains a weakness Report on value added measures of student performance 2015-16 The Vice Principal for Curriculum and Quality presented a report for Level 3 graded programmes in 2015-16. The following points were made: Level 3 performance shows an improvement in 2015-16 The Vocational and AS programmes increased by 20% and 19% Over 73% of L3 Vocational students exceeded their minimum target grade Computing was much improved with an increase of 64.92% of learners achieving or exceeding their minimum target grade 54.55% of students for Sport, Leisure and Tourism achieved below their expected target grade. There is a correlation between value added and poor achievement Visual and Performing Arts and Health and Social Care failed to reach their predictions and are being addressed through the College Improvement Plan Q: Does there need to be investment into the pastoral care in these areas? No, a number of mental health students were on these courses that could not reach their maximum potential. Members discussed that a number of the local schools are currently providing a good performing arts offer which is causing competition. The College has continued to achieve results until the provision ended. A full Value Added report will be provided at the spring Corporation meeting. GL Corporation Minutes 13 December 2016 4 The Safeguarding Annual Report for 2015/16 and the Annual Health and Safety Report The Safeguarding Annual Report for 2015/16 and the Annual Health and Safety Report were provided in advance of the meeting. The Chair attended the recent Safeguarding meeting where the document was discussed in detail. The Chair reported that the staff within the department remain committed. Members discussed the pink column on the graph on page 13. Members discussed that the pink column reflects safeguarding across the board. A staff governor reported that staff are vigilant and that all issues are taken seriously. The SPOC results indicate that students feel safe at Macclesfield College. Mark Sharples will continue to deputise for Valerie Herbert at Safeguarding meetings when required. The Chair congratulated the new security guard who was creating a safe environment for students, staff and visitors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluating the Impact of the Cheshire East Emotionally Health Schools Pilot Project
    Evaluating the impact of the Cheshire East Emotionally Health Schools Pilot Project Research Report April 2017 1 This study was carried out by the University of Salford CYP@Salford research group on behalf of Cheshire East Council. The study was funded by Cheshire East Council. The purpose of the study was to identify the outcomes for pupils and staff following the delivery of the Emotional Healthy Schools pilot project into six secondary schools. The research team acknowledges the support and time given by the staff and pupils of the pilot schools and the EHS project team to make this research possible. 2 CYP@Salford Improving Outcomes for Children, Young People and Families http://www.salford.ac.uk/nmsw/research/children,-young-people-and-families Our research spans health, social care and education, and focuses on enhancing services, improving outcomes and evidencing impacts on children and families. The research group works closely with colleagues in the NHS, Local Authorities, the Third Sector, and national networks. We have research links with international partners in the Nordic countries, the Middle East, the Far East, Europe and Australia. Celeste Foster Principal Investigator Dr Gillian Rayner Dr Shelly Allen CYP@Salford School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work and Social Sciences Mary Seacole Building University of Salford SALFORD M6 6PU 3 Contents CYP@Salford ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Tables and Figures .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Macclesfield Academy Park Lane, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK11 8JR
    School report The Macclesfield Academy Park Lane, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK11 8JR Inspection dates 21–22 May 2013 Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because Although significant improvements have been Teaching is not consistently good across the made since the academy opened under two majority of subjects, and there are insufficient years ago, students’ overall achievement is lessons in which it is outstanding. not yet good. Some teachers take too little account of Some lower-ability students and those students’ prior knowledge when planning tasks, supported through ‘school action’ do not so that it is not built on sufficiently well to always make sufficient progress to enable improve students’ understanding and speed up them to reach their full potential. their learning. The proportion of higher-ability students reaching the highest A* to A grades at GCSE, for example in English and mathematics, is below average. The school has the following strengths The headteacher, senior leaders and Students behave well and feel safe. They are governors have set an ambitious agenda for proud of their academy and parents are improvement underpinned by challenging overwhelmingly supportive of what it has to targets. offer. Many parents praise the excellent The academy demonstrated one of the pastoral care and support for their children and fastest rates of improvement in students’ are appreciative of how this is given equal attainment of any school in the country in emphasis to academic targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]
  • New Year: New Resolutions
    NEW YEAR: NEW RESOLUTIONS Welcome to our first Newsletter has been to develop our students for other activities and get a healthy of 2019. At the start of a new year, as independent learners. This is an 8 hours’ sleep! our thoughts inevitably turn to new ongoing challenge for some who Whatever your resolutions, I wish you resolutions, and in assembly on the instinctively ask for a teacher’s all a healthy and happy New Year. first day of term Mr Nicholson and I help before exhausting all other shared the magic numbers behind available strategies. Our approach is With every best wish! our resolutions with Year 11. For Mr summed up in the phrase 3 before Nicholson, the magic number was 5 me, which represents our expectation as he tries to curb his chocolate habit that students will first, think for and increase his intake of fruit and themselves, secondly, consult their vegetables. For me the number was learning resources and, thirdly, discuss 10000 as, armed with my Christmas with each other, before asking for help. present fit bit, and in fierce competition RICHARD HEDGE The third number (and one which I with my daughters, I try to increase the Headteacher shared with the Year 11 students in number of steps I walk each day. their first assembly) applies to all of For our students I want to suggest those students who are preparing three other numbers that could for external exams. The number is 2 usefully underpin resolutions for them because we can guarantee that all at the start of a new year.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.30 Am Meeting
    MEETING OF THE CORPORATION OF MACCLESFIELD COLLEGE TUESDAY 6 OCTOBER 2020 – 9.30 AM MEETING TOOK PLACE VIA ZOOM PART I Clerk: Mrs R Clare Attendance: M Wright (Chair), C Trasler, P Newell, A Sutcliffe, N Schofield, K Williams, J Walters, N Mannion, S Musgrave, R Kay In L French, L Reed, S Gardiner attendance: Apologies: M Sharples, E Kennedy MINUTES Actions 4/20 The Macclesfield Academy AS/RH RK requested a formal paper on the timeline of the process, options and timescales and a thorough report on this matter for the next Corporation meeting. 6/20 Quality and Curriculum LR A governor questioned the percentages reported in the table. LR will check the figures provided by MIS. LR stated that this might be due to the coding from MIS but the columns should add up to 100% so required a further review. 7/20 Business LF ELT are holding a strategic day offsite to review the finance and strategic position in more detail and contingencies will be shared at the December Corporation meeting including assumptions and impact on the budget. 7/20 Business (Enrolment update) LF LF explained that apprenticeship numbers would be shared at the next meeting after the new starts at the end of October. 7/20 Business (Enrolment update) LF Numbers of Levy and Non-Levy to be shared at the next meeting. Corporation Minutes 6 October 2020 1 Item Title 28/20 Welcome and Apologies for Absence MW acted as Chair for the meeting in the absence of MS. MW welcomed Members to the first meeting of the academic year and confirmed apologies for absence.
    [Show full text]
  • List of North West Schools
    List of North West Schools This document outlines the academic and social criteria you need to meet depending on your current secondary school in order to be eligible to apply. For APP City/Employer Insights: If your school has ‘FSM’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling. If your school has ‘FSM or FG’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling or be among the first generation in your family to attend university. For APP Reach: Applicants need to have achieved at least 5 9-5 (A*-C) GCSES and be eligible for free school meals OR first generation to university (regardless of school attended) Exceptions for the academic and social criteria can be made on a case-by-case basis for children in care or those with extenuating circumstances. Please refer to socialmobility.org.uk/criteria-programmes for more details. If your school is not on the list below, or you believe it has been wrongly categorised, or you have any other questions please contact the Social Mobility Foundation via telephone on 0207 183 1189 between 9am – 5:30pm Monday to Friday. School or College Name Local Authority Academic Criteria Social Criteria Abraham Moss Community School Manchester 4 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Academy@Worden Lancashire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Accrington Academy Lancashire 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG Accrington and Rossendale College Lancashire Please check your secondary Please check your school.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Education Report 2011/2012
    Annual Education Report 2011/2012 February 2013 Children, Families & Adults Directorate Plan 2012-13 : Objective 3 : ‘Raise standards, increase self confidence and narrow the gap in learning outcomes. To enable young people to develop, have the ability and appropriate skills for a successful transition into adulthood’ . 1 Contents: Executive Summary 1) Introduction Page 3 2) Cheshire East Schools and their Pupils Page 4 3) Achievement during the Early years Pages 5-8 4) Achievement in Primary Schools Pages 9-16 5) Achievement in Secondary Schools Pages 17-23 6) Post 16 Pages 23-26 7) Attendance and Exclusions Pages 27-33 8) Local Authority Support, Monitoring, Challenge & Intervention Page 34 9) Identified Intervention programmes & Initiatives Page 35 - 38 10) Key National Policy Changes : Impact on Cheshire East Schools Pages 39 – 47 & promoting new relationships with schools Appendices: Pages 48 - 60 Appendix 1 - OFSTED Inspections Appendix 2 - EYFSP school level results 2011 & 2012 Appendix 3 - KS2 School Level Results 2011 & 2012 Appendix 4 - KS4 School Level Results 2011 & 2012 Appendix 5 - Post 16 School Level Results 2011 & 2012 2 ANNUAL EDUCATION REPORT 2011-12 Executive Summary This Executive Summary of the Annual Education Report captures the main findings from the 65 page report relating to the overall performance of Schools (including Academies) and Settings during 2011-12 from Early Years through to Post 16. The overall aim of the report is to produce an overview of educational outcomes for young people across Cheshire East in a format which is accessible to a range of stakeholders. A key aspect of the Annual Plan, which is the first year in this format, is to address some of the fundamental issues and challenges facing Schools and the Local Authority in responding to the national educational landscape in order to provide local solutions where relationships between Schools and the Authority are re-shaped.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire East Safeguarding Children's Partnership Document
    Cheshire East Safeguarding Children’s Partnership 1 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Safeguarding Partnership Arrangements................................................................................................ 4 Geographical boundaries covered by these arrangements .................................................................... 4 What is it like to be a child in Cheshire East ........................................................................................... 6 Effective Support – Cheshire East Early Help Model and Continuum of Need ....................................... 7 Arrangements for Identifying and Responding to the Needs of Children in Cheshire East.................... 8 Aims of the Cheshire East Safeguarding Children Partnership ........................................................... 9 Our Collective Vision for the Children and Young People of Cheshire East ....................................... 9 Priorities .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Partnership Values ............................................................................................................................ 10 The Partnership Quality Assurance Model ........................................................................................... 11 Quantative Data ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • School 20Mph Zones
    Appendix A 20mph Speed Limits Existing School Sites School Ward 1 Alderley Edge School for Girls Aldeley Edge 2 The Ryleys School 3 Alderley Edge Community Primary 4 Bollington Cross CE Primary 5 Bollington St John's CE Primary Bollington 6 Dean Valley Comm Primary 7 St Gregory's Catholic Primary 8 Brereton CE Primary Brereton Rural 9 Whirley Primary Broken Cross & Upton 10 Acton CE Primary Bunbury 11 Beechwood Primary & Nursery Crewe Central 12 Vine Tree Primary Crewe South 13 South Cheshire College 14 St Thomas More Catholic High School Crewe West 15 Disley Primary Disley 16 High Legh Primary High Legh Poynton East & Pott 17 Pott Shrigley Church School Shrigley 18 Prestbury CE Primary Prestbury 19 St John's Primary Sandbach Heath & East 20 Ashdene Primary Wilmslow West & Chorley 21 St Mary's Catholic Primary & Nursery Wistaston 22 Wistaston Church Lane Primary 23 Bickerton Holy Trinity CE Primary Wrenbury Appendix B Advisory 20mph Speed Limits Proposed School Sites – Year 1 Speed Limit Estimated School Ward (mph) Cost (£) 1 Cranberry Academy 30 8000 Alsager 2 Alsager School 30 8000 3 Sound and District Primary 30 Audlem 4000 Warmingham C of E 4 30 Brereton Rural 4000 Primary St Oswalds Worleston C of 5 30 4000 E Primary Peover Superior 6 30 8000 (Controlled) Primary Chelford 7 Nether Alderley Primary 40 4000 8 Mossley C of E Primary 30 Congleton East 8000 9 Daven Primary 30 4000 Congleton West 10 Marfields Primary 30 4000 11 Monks Coppenhall Primary 30 Crewe East 8000 St Michael’s Community 12 30 Crewe North 8000 Academy Goostrey Community 13 30 Dane Valley 4000 Primary Bosley St Mary’s C of E 14 40 Gawsworth 4000 Primary St Benedict’s Catholic 15 30 8000 primary Handforth Wilmslow Grange Comm.
    [Show full text]
  • URN Institution Name 143129 Phoenix Academy 142905 South
    University of Kent's Institution Contextual Flag All schools on this list meet the requirements for the University of Kent's Institution Contextual Flag. The Institution Contextual Flag is given to all institutions whose data indicates that they perform in the bottom 40% nationally for KS5 results reported by the Department for Education each year. We use the average point school per entry and where data is not available, we use KS4 result, if available. In order to make this more reliable we look at data over a three year period to see if they are low performing for at least two out of the last three years. In cases where an Institution is flagged, but subsequently closes, the flag will be retained and the institution will continue to appear on the list. We use the Institution supplied by you in your UCAS application (the UCAS centre or Last Institution) to identify whether it has a Contextual Flag. Please note: independent schools are not included, neither do we have data from government agencies in Scotland and Northern Ireland and therefore these cannot be given a flag. Similarly, there may be schools or colleges which have recently changed name, status or have merged and this has resulted in no data being reported by the Department of Education , in these instances we will not be able to assess the Institution for a Contextual Flag.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Draft Risk Assessment for Reopening September 2020
    Reopening Risk Assessment 17th September 2020 The Macclesfield Academy: Covid-19 Draft Risk Assessment for Reopening September 2020 Introduction Following the closure of schools in England for most students which came into effect on 23rd March 2020, The Macclesfield Academy operated a “Rainbow School” for the children of key workers and those who are vulnerable because they have and EHCP or a social worker. On 15th June, provision in the “rainbow school” was increased to include Year 10 students. The government is now asking schools to re-open to all students at the start of term in September 2020. The reasoning behind this decision is set out in the DfE guidance on re-opening (last updated on 17th September 2020): When we made the decision to ask schools to open only to a small number of children, this was done with the aim of reducing transmission of coronavirus (COVID-19), to protect the NHS and save lives. As the situation improved, we began to consider how we could bring more children and young people back into schools. From 1 June, we supported primary schools to welcome some children back, focusing on specific year groups being educated in small ‘bubbles’, and from 15 June secondary schools welcomed back year 10 and 12 students to spend some time in school in small groups, with public health risk reduction measures in place. Since 15 June, primary schools have also had the flexibility to bring back other pupils where they have space to do so. Now, the circumstances have changed. The prevalence of coronavirus (COVID-19) has decreased, our NHS Test and Trace system is up and running and we are clear about the measures that need to be in place to create safer environments within schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Impact of Cheshire East Emotionally Health Schools Pilot Project
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Salford Institutional Repository SCHOOL OF NURSING, MIDWIFERY & SOCIAL WORK AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, COLLEGE OF HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE, UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD Evaluating the Impact of Cheshire East Emotionally Health Schools Pilot Project Interim Report: Early Findings July 2016 Authors: Celeste Foster: Senior Lecturer Mental Health; Senior Child and Adolescent Mental Health Nurse; Registered Adolescent Psychotherapist (MA, PGCE, BSc (Hons), Reg. MBACP, RMN) Dr Shelly Allen: Senior Lecturer in Mental Health Nursing (PhD, MSc, BSc (hons), PGCE, RMN Dr Gillian Rayner: Senior Lecturer in Mental Health Nursing (PhD RMN/RGN, MA counselling, PGDip CBP, PGCE,) BABCP accredited Psychotherapist Trainer and Supervisor. Research study undertaken by the University of Salford, commissioned and funded by Cheshire East Council 1 Contents Page No. 1. Research project focus and objectives 3 2. Research methods (mapped to intended outcomes) 4 3. Interim results 7 a. Referral rates 7 b. Survey participation data 8 c. Pupil baseline survey findings 9 d. Staff baseline survey results 17 e. Targeted intervention outcome measures 23 f. CAMHS consultation feedback questionnaires 28 4. Discussion of headline findings from the interim evaluation data 30 5. References 32 Tables and Figures Tables Page No. Table 1 CAMHS referral data by school 7 Table 2 & 3 Survey participation rates 8 Table 4 Summary of student baseline survey outcomes 10 Table 5 Summary of staff
    [Show full text]