2015 Mar ZPM 27Mar15
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cacomantis Merulinus) Nestlings and Their Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus Sutorius) Hosts Odd Helge Tunheim1, Bård G
Tunheim et al. Avian Res (2019) 10:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0143-z Avian Research RESEARCH Open Access Development and behavior of Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) nestlings and their Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius) hosts Odd Helge Tunheim1, Bård G. Stokke1,2, Longwu Wang3, Canchao Yang4, Aiwu Jiang5, Wei Liang4, Eivin Røskaft1 and Frode Fossøy1,2* Abstract Background: Our knowledge of avian brood parasitism is primarily based on studies of a few selected species. Recently, researchers have targeted a wider range of host–parasite systems, which has allowed further evaluation of hypotheses derived from well-known study systems but also disclosed adaptations that were previously unknown. Here we present developmental and behavioral data on the previously undescribed Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) nestling and one of its hosts, the Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius). Methods: We discovered more than 80 Common Tailorbird nests within an area of 25 km2, and we recorded nestling characteristics, body mass, tarsus length and begging display every 3 days for both species. Results: Plaintive Cuckoo nestlings followed a developmental pathway that was relatively similar to that of their well-studied relative, the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Tailorbird foster siblings were evicted from the nest rim. The cuckoo nestlings gained weight faster than host nestlings, and required 3–9 days longer time to fedge than host nestlings. Predation was high during the early stages of development, but the nestlings acquired a warning display around 11 days in the nest, after which none of the studied cuckoo nestlings were depredated. The cuckoos’ begging display, which appeared more intense than that of host nestlings, was initially vocally similar with that of the host nestlings but began to diverge from the host sound output after day 9. -
Notes on the Parasitic Ecology of Newly-Fledged Fan-Tailed Cuckoos Cacomantis Flabelliformis and Their White-Browed Scrubwren Se
162 The Sunbird 2019, Vol 48 / Colleen Poje et al Notes on the parasitic ecology of newly-fledged Fan-tailed Cuckoos Cacomantis flabelliformis and their White-browed Scrubwren Sericornis frontalis hosts in south-east Queensland Colleen Poje1*, James A. Kennerley1,2*, Nicole M. Richardson1, Zara-Louise Cowan1, Maggie R. Grundler1,3,4, Matthew Marsh1, William E. Feeney1* 1 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, Australia 2 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom 3Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 4Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA *Correspond with: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract Despite brood parasitic cuckoos being the subject of much scientific attention, in large part due to the study of the adaptation-counter adaptation evolutionary “arms-races” that they have with their hosts, there is surprisingly little literature on the natural habits of newly-fledged cuckoos. Generally, it is believed that after depositing their egg in their host’s nest, adult cuckoos provide no parental care and care is only provided by the foster parents. However, intriguing records of adult cuckoos feeding newly-fledged cuckoos and provisioning by adult birds other than the cuckoo’s host parents exist. Fledged-but-dependent Fan-tailed Cuckoos Cacomantis flabelliformis have been recorded to be fed by both adult conspecifics and a variety of non-foster parent adult birds, making it an interesting species to begin investigating why these phenomena exist. Here, we followed seven fledged but dependent Fan- tailed Cuckoos over the course of three months (August – October 2017) at Lake Samsonvale in south-east Queensland, Australia, to investigate their feeding ecology and record interactions between them and other species. -
Order CUCULIFORMES: Cuckoos Suborder CUCULI: Cuckoos Family CUCULIDAE Leach: Cuckoos Subfamily CUCULINAE Leach: Parasitic Cuckoo
Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 259-260. Order CUCULIFORMES: Cuckoos Suborder CUCULI: Cuckoos An agreed phylogeny of the cuckoos and their relatives has not yet been achieved —see Christidis & Boles (2008) for the latest review of recent studies. Family CUCULIDAE Leach: Cuckoos Subfamily CUCULINAE Leach: Parasitic Cuckoos Cuculidae Leach, 1819: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 15th Edition, London: 66– Type genus Cuculus Linnaeus, 1758. Order of species follows Christidis & Boles (1994) and Mason (1997). Christidis & Boles (2008) approximately reversed the sequence of genera to Eudynamys, Scythrops, Chalcites, Cacomantis and Cuculus. We have not adopted this since the situation seems unstable and liable to further change. Genus Cuculus Linnaeus Cuculus Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 110 – Type species (by tautonymy) Cuculus canorus Linnaeus. Heteroscenes Cabanis & Heine, 1863: Mus. Heineanum 4(1): 26 – Type species (by monotypy) Columba pallida Latham = Cuculus pallidus (Latham). Cuculus pallidus (Latham) Pallid Cuckoo Columba pallida Latham, 1802: Index Ornith. Suppl.: lx – “Nouvelle-Hollande”, restricted to New South Wales, Australia (fide Mason 1997, Zool. Cat. Australia 37.2: 228). Cuculus pallidus (Latham); Checklist Committee 1953, Checklist N.Z. Birds: 55. Cuculus (Heteroscenes) pallidus (Latham); Mason 1997, Zool. Cat. Australia 37.2: 228. No subspecies. Breeds in southern parts of Australia, including Tasmania. -
(Orthotomus Sutorius) Parasitism by Plaintive Cuckoo
Nahid et al. Avian Res (2016) 7:14 DOI 10.1186/s40657-016-0049-y Avian Research SHORT REPORT Open Access First record of Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius) parasitism by Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) in Bangladesh Mominul Islam Nahid1,2, Frode Fossøy1, Sajeda Begum2, Eivin Røskaft1 and Bård G. Stokke1* Abstract The Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) is a widespread brood parasite in Asia, but no data on host species utili- zation in Bangladesh exist. By searching for nests of all possible host species of the Plaintive Cuckoo at Jahangirnagar university campus, north of Dhaka, we were able to determine which hosts were used in this area. We found that the Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius) was the only potential host used by Plaintive Cuckoos, and parasitism rate was rather high (31.3 %, n 16). However, both host and cuckoo breeding success was poor (0 %, n 16) due to fre- quent nest predation. Details= on host and cuckoo egg appearance are provided. Our findings indicate= that Common Tailorbirds are common hosts of the Plaintive Cuckoo in Central Bangladesh. Keywords: Brood parasitism, Plaintive Cuckoo, Cacomantis merulinus, Common Tailorbird, Orthotomus sutorius, Bangladesh Background brood parasites, the first key information is to provide Several avian brood parasites appear to be generalists at background data on host use in various parts of their the species level, utilizing a range of host species. Such range. parasites, however, may consist of several host specific The Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) is an races (also called gentes), each utilizing one or a few interspecific obligatory brood-parasitic bird, with a host species (de Brooke and Davies 1988; Moksnes and wide range in south and south-east Asia (Becking 1981; Røskaft 1995; Davies 2000; Gibbs et al. -
BIRDS of HALIMUN-SALAK NATIONAL PARK, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA: Saitou, N
Treubia 43: 31–46, December 2016 Treubia 43: 47–70, December 2016 BIRDS OF HALIMUN-SALAK NATIONAL PARK, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA: Saitou, N. & M. Nei 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4: 406-425. ENDEMISM, CONSERVATION AND THREATENED STATUS Simmons, N.B. 2005. Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson, D.E. & D.M. Reeder (eds.). Mammal Species of the Dewi M. Prawiradilaga World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. pp. 312- Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) 529. Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km 46 Cibinong 16911, Indonesia e-mail: [email protected] Suyanto, A. 2001. Kelelawar di Indonesia. Bogor: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. 126 pp. Temminck, C.J. 1827 (1824)-1841. Monographies de Mammalogie, ou description de quelques genres de Received: 8 August 2016; Accepted: 5 December 2016 mammiferes, dont les espèces ont été observées dans les différens musées de l’Europe. C.C. Vander Hoek, Leiden, 392 pp. ABSTRACT Thompson, J.D., T.J. Gibson & F. Plewniak 1997. The Clustal X Windows Interface: Flexible Strategies for Multiple Sequence Alignment Aided by the Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24: Bird surveys and long-term bird monitoring in Gunung Halimun-Salak National Park were 4876-4882. conducted between 1998 and 2009 to obtain comprehensive data on the bird species in the area. Compilation of bird data from this study and other studies have recorded a total of 271 species, which is about 53.4% of van Strien, N.J. 1986. Abbreviated checklist of the mammals of the Australian Archipelago. -
Download Preprint
A continental measure of urbanness predicts avian response to local urbanization Corey T. Callaghan*1 (0000-0003-0415-2709), Richard E. Major1,2 (0000-0002-1334-9864), William K. Cornwell1,3 (0000-0003-4080-4073), Alistair G. B. Poore3 (0000-0002-3560- 3659), John H. Wilshire1, Mitchell B. Lyons1 (0000-0003-3960-3522) 1Centre for Ecosystem Science; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences; UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 3Evolution and Ecology Research Centre; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences; UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia *Corresponding author: [email protected] NOTE: This is a pre-print, and the final published version of this manuscript can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04863 Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by the Australian Wildlife Society. Mark Ley, Simon Gorta, and Max Breckenridge were instrumental in conducting surveys in the Blue Mountains. We also are grateful to the numerous volunteers who submit their data to eBird, and the dedicated team of reviewers who ensure the quality of the database. We thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript. Author contributions CTC, WKC, JHW, and REM conceptualized the data processing to assign urban scores. CTC, MBL, and REM designed the study. CTC performed the data analysis with insight from WKC and AGBP. All authors contributed to drafting and editing the manuscript. Data accessibility Code and data necessary to reproduce these analyses have been uploaded as supplementary material alongside this manuscript, and will be made available as a permanently archived Zenodo repository upon acceptance of the manuscript. -
Monitoring and Population Assessment of Baer's Pochard In
Monitoring An assessment of the wintering popula4on of Baer’s Pochard in central Myanmar Thiri Dae We Aung, Thet Zaw Naing, Saw Moses, Lay Win, Aung Myin Tun, Thiri Sandar Zaw and Simba Chan May 2016 Biodiversity And Nature Conservation Association Page May 2016 Submitted To:Oriental Bird Club P.O.Box 324, Bedford, MK42 0WG, United Kingdom. Submitted By: Thiri Dae We Aung1, Thet Zaw Naing2, Saw Moses3, Lay Win4, Aung Myin Tun5, Thiri Sandar Zaw6, Simba Chan7 1 Biodiversity And Nature Conservation Association, Myanmar 2 Wildlife Conservation Society, Myanmar 3 4 5 6 Biodiversity And Nature Conservation Association, Myanmar 7 BirdLife International, Tokyo, Japan To obtain copies of this report contact: Biodiversity And Nature Conservation Association, No.943(A), 2nd floor, Kyeikwine Pagoda Road, Mayangone Township, Yangon, Myanmar. [email protected] Front Photo Caption: Sighting Baer’s Pochard at Pyu Lake (photo by: Simba Chan) Suggested citation: Aung, T.D, T.Z. Naing, S. Moses, L. Win, A.M. Tun, T.S. Zaw & S. Chan. 2016. An assessment of the wintering population of Baer’s Pochard in central Myanmar. Unpublished report, Biodiversity And Nature Conservation Association: ?? pp. Biodiversity And Nature Conservation Association Page Table of Contents ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................4 -
Horsfield's Bronze-Cuckoo Chalcite
Australian Field Ornithology 2018, 35, 8–12 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo35008012 A photographic guide for ageing nestlings of two Australian brood-parasitic cuckoo species: Horsfield’s Bronze-Cuckoo Chalcites basalis and the Fan-tailed Cuckoo Cacomantis flabelliformis William E. Feeney1*, Thomas A. Ryan1, 2, James A. Kennerley1, 2, Colleen Poje1, 2, Lacey Clarke1, 2, Miles Scheuering1, 2 and Michael S. Webster2 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia 2Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca New York 14853, United States of America *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Accurate ageing of nestling birds is important for a variety of ecological, evolutionary and ornithological research. However, this can be difficult when nests are found after the eggs have hatched, especially for less-common species such as brood-parasitic cuckoos. Here we present a photographic guide for ageing nestlings of two species of Australian cuckoo: Horsfield’s Bronze-Cuckoo Chalcites basalis and the Fan-tailed Cuckoo Cacomantis flabelliformis. Evidence of chick rejection by several hosts of bronze-cuckoos Chalcites spp. and counter-adaptations in cuckoo nestlings has prompted increased research attention in this subject. This guide will help facilitate these efforts as well as research into the ecologies of other unstudied cuckoos. Introduction ontogeny do not exist for any Australian cuckoo species (though see Gill 1982 for notes on the Shining Bronze- The nestling period presents a critical life-history stage Cuckoo Chalcites lucidus lucidus in New Zealand). Here, in altricial birds and a useful model for studying a variety we provide a photographic guide for ageing nestlings of two of biological questions. -
Targeted Fauna Assessment.Pdf
APPENDIX H BORR North and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment (Biota, 2019) Bunbury Outer Ring Road Northern and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment Prepared for GHD December 2019 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 1463 Prepared by: V. Ford, R. Teale J. Keen, J. King Document Quality Checking History Version: Rev A Peer review: S. Ford Director review: M. Maier Format review: S. Schmidt, M. Maier Approved for issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx 3 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna 4 Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Methods -
A Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands South Australia in 2003
A BIODIVERSITY SURVEY OF THE ADELAIDE PARK LANDS SOUTH AUSTRALIA IN 2003 By M. Long Biological Survey and Monitoring Science and Conservation Directorate Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2003 The Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands, South Australia was carried out with funds made available by the Adelaide City Council. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Adelaide City Council or the State Government of South Australia. This report may be cited as: Long, M. (2003). A Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands, South Australia in 2003 (Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Department for Human Services, Housing, Environment and Planning Library 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 AUTHOR M. Long Biological Survey and Monitoring Section, Science and Conservation Directorate, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) ANALYSIS AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Maps: Environmental Analysis and Research Unit, Department for Environment and Heritage COVER DESIGN Public Communications and Visitor Services, Department for Environment and Heritage. PRINTED BY © Department for Environment and Heritage 2003. ISBN 0759010536 Cover Photograph: North Terrace and the River Torrens northwards to North Adelaide from the air showing some of the surrounding Adelaide Park Lands Photo: Department for Environment and Heritage ii Adelaide Park Lands Biodiversity Survey PREFACE The importance of this biodiversity survey of the Adelaide Park Lands cannot be overstated. Our Adelaide Park Lands are a unique and invaluable ‘natural’ asset. -
Printable PDF Format
Field Guides Tour Report THAILAND 2020 Jan 16, 2020 to Feb 6, 2020 Jay VanderGaast & Uthai Treesucon For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Participant Craig Caldwell captured this wonderful shot of a shimmering male Green Peafowl with part of his harem of peahens as they strolled along the track ahead of us at a forest reserve near Chiang Mai. Each year I do this tour, I think back to the previous year and think "this tour can't possibly be as good as last year's", but so far, I'm happy to report, I've been wrong. Each and every trip I've done here has been superlative in almost every way imaginable, thanks to the combination of an incredibly diverse avifauna, one of my favorite cuisines in the world, and easily the most amazing, attentive ground crew on any tour I've done. This year's tour was no exception, as we roamed the country, tallying an astounding assortment of gorgeous birds, and enjoying exemplary service (and food) from Wat, Kaew, Nat, Jiang, and Jock. I'm just glad they don't weigh me before and after the trip! All that said, the tour wasn't without its bumps, and one big bump in particular was a particular thorn in the sides of the guides, that being the elusiveness of one of the marquee birds of the tour--Spoon-billed Sandpiper. We spent more than a little time scouring the swarms of shorebirds in search of this rarity, striking out in our allotted time along the coast. -
Newsletter for Ornithologists Vol
Newsletter for Ornithologists Vol. 1 No. 4 (July-August 2004) NEWSLETTER FOR ORNITHOLOGISTS Vol. 1 No. 4 July-August 2004 Newsletter for Ornithologists Vol. 1 No. 4 (July-August 2004) READY-RECKONER Internet Resources India Birds: http://www.indiabirds.com/ Bird conservation organisations Birds of Kerala: http://birdskerala.com/ BOMBAY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY: Honorary Secretary, Hornbill BirdLife International: http://www.birdlife.net/ House, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai 400023, Maharashtra. Indian Jungles: http://www.indianjungles.com/ Website: www.bnhs.org. Email: [email protected]. Publish: Birds of Kolkata: http://www.kolkatabirds.com/ Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society; Hornbill. Contact Sanctuary Asia: http://www.sanctuaryasia.com/ above for: INDIAN BIRD CONSERVATION NETWORK: Publish: Red Data Book: http://www.rdb.or.id/index.html/ Mistnet. ENVIS CENTRE: Publish: Buceros. The Northern India Bird Network: http://www.delhibird.com/ SALIM ALI CENTRE FOR ORNITHOLOGY AND NATURAL Zoological Nomenclature Resource: http://www.zoonomen.net/ HISTORY: Director, Anaikatty P.O., Coimbatore 641108, India. N.C.L. Centre for Biodiversity Informatics: http://www.ncbi.org.in/ Website: www.saconindia.org. Email: [email protected] biota/fauna/ BIRDWATCHERS’ SOCIETY OF ANDHRA PRADESH: Honorary John Penhallurick’s Bird Data Project: http://worldbirdinfo.net/ Secretary, P.O. Box 45, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Saving Asia’s threatened birds: Website: www.bsaponline.org. Email: [email protected]. Publish: http://www.birdlife.net/action/science/species/asia_strategy/ Mayura; Pitta. pdfs.html/ MADRAS NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY: Honorary Secretary, No. 8, Janaki Optics: http://www.betterviewdesired.com/ Avenue, Abhirampuram, Chennai 600018, India. Website: www.blackbuck.org. Email: [email protected].