Arxiv:2107.01683V1 [Hep-Ph] 4 Jul 2021 Ai Prxmto Nte2 Oe Hog H Higgs-Dilat the ﬁeld

Home , Inflaton

arXiv:2107.01683v1 [hep-ph] 4 Jul 2021 ai prxmto nte2 oe hog h Higgs-dilat the field. through the model to the 2T respect is the with in scenario approximation slowly basic basic changes The potential can scenarios. the promising which inflation a many as Fo are boson there elusive. Higgs remained consider inflation usually researchers for responsible field inflaton orpeettewoecso,a ela h nrdcinof introduction 2008). the (since as decade well a as than cosmos, more numb for the whole expanding the proposed represent has to extended theory model’s This standard i.e the theory. plane, of gravity d combination a also a is on is breakdown advances physics symmetry 2T that spontaneous time model’s of This vision time. unusual an with us n xtcprilsbtteiflto sntytaaye nd inflation. in for analyzed materials yet new not an be is can both inflation boson has the dilaton therefore and but model particles 2T exotic The and space-time. of dimensions ial,w umrz n aeotok nsection in th of outlooks domain make parameter and section the summarize c In get we dilaton and Finally, the scenario potential. that inflation show Dilaton warm and new the inflation a warm of to features introduce salient and model 2T eateto hoeia hsc,Uiest fSine H Science, of University Physics, Theoretical of Department OSRITO H IG-IAO OETA I WARM VIA POTENTIAL HIGGS-DILATON THE ON CONSTRAINT h Tmdl[,2 ,4 ,6 ]cudb elkoncoc.Th choice. known well a be could 7] 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, [1, model 2T The fe lnGt nrdcdtecneto naini 91[8 1981 in inflation of concept the introduced Guth Alan After ercgieta h nainpolmhsade connection deep a has problem inflation the that recognize We hsatcei raie sflos nsection In follows. as organized is article This Abstract. ihtodmnin ftm n h iao edta a eid be can that field form dilaton the the of potential and with time scenario of inflation dimensions two with fprmtr o h ig-iao oeta,tecouplin the potential, Higgs-Dilaton the ( for parameters of e.Teeoe h Tmdlidrcl ugssta extr that suggests indirectly 2T-model inflation. the Therefore, GeV. α slgrthan lager is ) ita ainlUiest,H h ihCt,Vietnam City, Minh Chi Ho University, National Vietnam ihnthe Within OQO HN N G HCDCLOC DUC PHUC NGO AND PHONG QUOC VO NLTO NTOTM PHYSICS TWO-TIME IN INFLATION omnctosi hsc,Vl ,N.0() p 1-15 pp. (0), 0 No. 0, Vol. Physics, in Communications 1 . 598 SP rsalrthan smaller or (2 R , ) .Introduction I. ymty h w-iemdl(Tmdl a i dimensions six has model) (2T model Two-time the symmetry, 2 . 13 ∼ × 10 φ 4 − rmta osdrto,w eieterange the derive we consideration, that From . 7 II hntems fDltni ae than lager is Dilaton of mass the when IV egv re nrdcint the to introduction brief a give we , . osatbtenHgsadDialton and Higgs between constant g -ieso a lob oreof source a be also can a-dimension biu cnmclreasons, economical obvious r iae[,1,1] Currently, 11]. 10, [9, didate nb dnie sifltnin inflaton as identified be an hoyadtesaetm or space-time the and theory ncoupling. on h ihCt,Vietnam City, Minh Chi o ffrn rmteS’.The SM’s. the from ifferent ro pctm dimensions spacetime of er ti,ie xr dimensions extra i.e, etail, eteeoeeaiethis examine therefore We lwrl prxmto in approximation slow-roll iao n t properties, its and dilaton ,i a w iesosof dimensions two has it ., nie sifltni warm a in inflaton as entified ig-iao potential. Higgs-Dilaton e xr-iesoa effect extra-dimensional III eitouesome introduce we , ,tentr fthe of nature the ], ihtenme of number the with oe presents model e 200 2 Vo Quoc Phong and Ngo Phuc Duc Loc

II. A brief introduction to 2T model and a new Dilaton potential II.1. The Sp(2,R) symmetry in the 2T model The main new feature of 2T-physics is a new gauge symmetry called Sp(2,R) that works in phase space (XM , P M ) (not just in spacetime like 1T-physics). We will show that Sp(2,R gauge symmetry) necessarily requires 2 timelike dimensions. In 2T-physics, spacetime coordinates and energy-momentum are united in a doublet M M M M M M (X1 , X2 ). X1 = X is spacetime coordinates in 2T-physics and X2 = P is energy- M momentum in 2T-physics. In short, we can label them as Xi with i=1,2. The symplectic transformation will act on this doublet and therefore, spacetime and energy-momentum can transform to each other. This is a brand new property of 2T-physics. In 1T-physics, we just have transformations between spacetime coordinates, for example, the Lorentz µ transformation or even in gauge theory, the local gauge transformation eiθ(x ) just involve spacetime coordinates. But in 2T-physics, we treat spacetime coordinates and energy- momentum equally and they can transform to each other. The local symplectic transformation is defined as [12] M kl M δωXi (τ)= ǫikω (τ)Xl (τ), (1) where τ is the proper time, ωij(τ) = ωji(τ) are parameters of Sp(2,R) and ǫij is tensor Levi-Cavita. To have a connection with the concept of Sp(2,R) group in section 3.1.1, we can write it out explicitly like this M 21 M 22 M δωX (τ)= ω (τ)X (τ)+ ω (τ)P (τ) M 11 M 12 M (2) δωP (τ)= ω (τ)X (τ) ω (τ)P (τ). ( − − ′M M M ′M M M Because X = X + δωX , P = P + δωP so in the matrix form X′M 1+ ω21 ω22 XM XM = = S . (3) P ′M ω11 1 ω12 P M P M − − So S should be an element of the symplectic group 1+ ω21 ω11 0 1 1+ ω21 ω22 ST JS = ω22 1− ω12 1 0 ω11 1 ω12 − − − − (4) 0 1 (ω12)2 + ω11ω22 = . [1 (ω12)2 + ω11ω22]− 0 − − Therefore, we found the constraints of symplectic parameters (ω12)2 = ω11ω22 or ω11 ω12 det = 0. (5) ω21 ω22 And remember that ω12 = ω21 by definition. In that case, S is indeed a symplectic element. Meanwhile, the local symplectic transformations for the gauge fields is ij ij ik lj jk il δωA = ∂τ ω + ω ǫklA + ω ǫklA , (6) for the gauge fields Aij = Aji. The covariant derivative is M M kl M Dτ X = ∂τ X ǫikA X . (7) i i − l Warm inflation in Two-Time Physics 3

The gauge fields here are not normal gauge fields corresponding to internal transformation of the field. In 1T-physics, in order to make the Lagrangian invariant under local gauge transformations of the scalar field, or spinor,... (we call this type of transformations internal transformations, they transform the fields, not coordinates) we have to replace the normal derivative by the covariant derivative that contains the gauge field and add the kinetic term of the gauge fields (we can not add the mass term since it will not be invariant under the gauge transformation of the gauge field, therefore we need the Higgs mechanism to generate the mass of the gauge fields). In 2T-physics, however, we also have the gauge fields corresponding to the transformations of the coordinates (we call this type of transformations external transformations). This is a new property that we do not have in 1T-physics. The Lagrangian that is invariant under this local symplectic transformation is[12] 1 S = dτ(D XM )ǫijXN η 0 2 τ i j MN Z 1 M kl M ij N = dτ(∂τ X ǫikA X )ǫ X ηMN (8) 2 i − l j Z M 1 ij M N = dτ X˙ PM A X X ηMN . − 2 i j Z The dot denotes the time derivative with respect to τ. Aij is the Sp(2,R) gauge potential. The equation of motion of this potential goes to the constraints, the target spacetime (1T) Ref.[4] We will take the variation of this action to get the equation of motion for the gauge fields and for X,P.1

˙ M ˙ M 1 2 11 1 12 1 21 1 2 22 PM δX + X δPM − 2 X δA − 2 X.PδA − 2 P.XδA − 2 P δA δS = dτ 1 11 2 1 12 1 21 1 22 2 Z − 2 A δ(X ) − 2 A δ(X.P ) − 2 A δ(P.X) − 2 A δ(P ) ˙ M ˙ M 1 2 11 1 12 1 21 1 2 22 PM δX + X δPM − 2 X δA − 2 X.PδA − 2 P.XδA − 2 P δA = dτ 11 M 12 M 21 M 22 M Z −A X δXM − A P δXM − A X δPM − A P δPM

1 2 11 1 12 1 2 22 d M = dτ(− X δA − (X.P + P.X)δA − P δA )+ dτ (δX PM ) Z 2 2 2 Z dτ M M 11 M 12 M 21 M 22 M + dτ(X˙ δPM − P˙M δX )+ dτ(−A X δXM − A P δXM − A X δPM − A P δPM ) Z Z 1 2 11 1 12 1 2 22 d M = dτ(− X δA − (X.P + P.X)δA − P δA )+ dτ (δX PM ) Z 2 2 2 Z dτ M 12 M 22 M M 11 M 12 M + dτ(X˙ − A X − A P )δPM − dτ(P˙ + A X + A P )δXM . Z Z (9) Set δS = 0, we have the equation of motion for the gauge ﬁeld A11, A12, A22 as X2 = P 2 = X.P + P.X = 0. (10)

1Note that: 2 M M M M δ(X )= δ(X XM )= XM δX + X δXM = 2X δXM M M M M M δ(X.P )= δ(X pM )= PM δX + X δPM = P δXM + X δPM 4 Vo Quoc Phong and Ngo Phuc Duc Loc

These are the constraints for Sp(2,R) generators2. The above equations have nontrivial solutions only if there are two times, with fewer times these conditions collapse the system to triviality. To see why, consider at first with no time dimension, and ask if there are solutions to equation such as X2 + Y 2 + Z2 + W 2 = 0 when there are no minus sign for time. Clearly, this equation just has trivial solution XM = P M = 0 which has no physical content. Next consider the case with one time dimension, we see that the only solution is that XM P M must be parallel light-like (null-like) vectors proportional to each other. The angular∼ momentum in defined as LMN = XM P N XN P M , (11) − will vanish, and hence this is a trivial solution that does not represent even free motion in 1T-physics. In the case of two time dimensions, these equations permit an infinite number of non-trivial solutions. Evidently, the extra time is not introduced ”by hand” but the symmetry demands its existence. The number of spatial dimensions is not limited, so in general, the spacetime of 2T-physics is d + 2 dimensions where d is the number of spatial dimensions. Meanwhile, the equations of motion for X,P are X˙ M A12XM A22P M = 0 M − 11 M − 12 M (12) (P˙ + A X + A P = 0. The particle model in 2T is still like the standard model [5], but te space-time is larger than the standard model [5]. Another important thing, the particle model in 2T includes an extra Dilaton in the Higgs potential [5]. Dilaton is a scalar field which lives in 4+2 dimensions of spacetime. In the standard model of 2T-physics [5], in order to initiate the electroweak phase transition that explains the source of mass for all massive matter, the 4 + 2 standard model requires the presence of a dilaton field coupled to the Higgs field. The dilaton is required also by the 2T formulation of general relativity in 4 + 2 dimensions. More details about dilaton in 2T-physics can be found in [5]. II.2. The Higgs-Dilaton potential and gauge fixing technique The Higgs-dilaton potential has the following form which is as a result of b-gauge symmetry, the inspiration of this symmetry comes from BRST formalism [5, 6] but it ultimately comes from the underlying Sp(2,R), 2 V (Φ,H)= λ H†H α2Φ2 + V (Φ) , − where λ, α are dimensionless couplings.H and Φ are the SU(2) Higgs and dilaton doublet respectively. V (Φ) is the dilaton potential and plays a role in construction of the effective potential. The more complicated work will be done with the Higgs-dilaton Lagrangian, 1 1 2 L(A, H, Φ) = Φ∂2Φ+ H†D2H + (D2H)†H λ H†H α2Φ2 V (Φ) . 2 2 − − − 2 The generators of Sp(2,R) is in general a function of X and P, Qij (X, P ). In flat spacetime with 2 2 no background field, they are Q11 = X , Q12 = Q21 = X.P + P.X and Q22 = P . Warm inflation in Two-Time Physics 5

It is convenient if one chooses a lightcone basis in 4+2 dimensions written as

±′ 1 0′ 1′ M M M M M X = Xi Xi , where Xi = (X , X ) (X , P ) (13) i √2 ± 1 2 ≡ 2 +′ −′ µ X = 2X X + X Xµ, M − +′ −′ −′ +′ µ (14) ⇒ X PM = X P X P + X Pµ . ( − − We choose the Bars’s parametrization [2] for the components of XM as follows

′ ′ X+ = κ, X− = κλ, Xµ = κxµ (15) −′ µ +′ X µ X κ = X , λ = ′ ,x = ′ , (16) ⇒ X+ X+ from this choose (the gauge fixing technology), we can reduce the 2T metric to 1T metric (Minkowski metric). Scalar fields will be reduced to the following: 1 1 Φ(X) φ(x) ; H(X) h(x), −→ κ −→ κ  2 2 M 1 ∂ φ(x) ∂ Φ(X)= ∂ ∂M Φ(X) , (17)  −→ κ3 ∂xµ∂x  µ  2 M 1 µ D H(X)= D DM H(X) D Dµh(x) . −→ κ3   With the above gauge fixing, one would be able to derive the following reduction 2 1 ∂ φ 1 † µ µ † L(A, H, Φ) 4 φ µ + 4 h DµD h + (D Dµh) h −→ 2κ ∂x ∂xµ 2κ h λ i 2 h†h α2φ2 V (φ) . (18) − κ4 − − Note that all the κ coefficients will be simplified by the scaling invariant of the actions through δ(X2) when reducing from 2T to 1T [5, 6]. The Higgs and Dilaton have redefined [5, 6] as

1 0 1 v h(x)= ; h(x) = v ; φ(x)= (v + αd(x)); φ(x) = . (19) √ v + σ(x) h i α√ h i α 2 2 As discussed in a companion paper [30], there are some reasons to expect that the new dilaton potential only takes the form V (Φ) = ρΦ4 and after gauge fixing to 1T-physics it takes the form V (φ) = ρφ4. We assume that the resulting scalar field after reducing the dilaton field from 2T-physics to 1T-physics is indeed the inflaton field, and we will use this quartic form of the potential V (φ)= ρφ4 (20) to study warm inflation in the following sections. The full Higgs-Dilaton potential is expanded as follows 6 Vo Quoc Phong and Ngo Phuc Duc Loc

λ 2 ρ V (h, φ)= (v + h)2 (v + αd)2 + (v + αd)4 4 − 4α4 λ = (h αd)2(2v + h + αd)2 4 − ρ + (v4 + 4αv3d + 6α2v2d2 + 4α3vd3 + α4d4) 4α4 λ = (4v2h2 + 4α2v2d2 8αv2hd) 4 − ρ + (v4 + 4αv3d + 6α2v2d2) + 3,4-ﬁelds interaction terms. (21) 4α4 From Eq. 21, we derive the mass of Higgs and Dilaton at tree level are 3ρ m2 (v) = 2λv2; m2(v) = 2 λα2 + v2, (22) h d 2α2 and notice that ρ has a very small value, which will be explained in a later section. This result is consistent with the results in Ref. [30] for ω = 0. The minimum process of this full Higgs-Dilaton potential can be considered as the minimum process of the potential when not V (φ). Because ρ is very small. The minimum process is detailed in Ref.[5].

III. Dilaton as inflaton in the warm φ4 inflation Inflation is a very short period of exponential expansion in the early Universe. This era is assumed to happen in order to explain some problems of the standard Big Bang cosmology including the horizon problem, the flatness problem, and the seeds of cosmic structures. The observational evidences strongly support the general ideas of inflation, but the details of inflation remain elusive. In standard inflation, there are two evident ways to calculate the inflaton mass. 1 2 2 The first one is using the quadratic inflaton potential V = 2 m ϕ , where m is the inflaton mass. The second one is using the exponential potential V = e−βϕ. In the latter case, we expand the Taylor series of the potential and the term in front of ϕ2 is the inflaton mass. Warm inflation is different to the standard inflation, is a model of inflation in which, apart from the quantum fluctuations of the inflaton field, the inflaton field is also subject to thermal fluctuations due to the interaction with the background thermal bath. This idea was first initiated by Berrera in 1995 [31]. Intuitively, we expect that in this model the inflationary gravitational waves amplitudes must be smaller than that in the standard ”cold” inflation. The reason is the following. The kinetic energy of the inflaton field will be dissipated due to the additional thermal fluctuations and hence its roll is slowed down further. This means that the inflaton field excursion can be small and yet still produces enough the number of e-folds to resolve the horizon or flatness problems. In turn, this implies that the tensor-to-scalar ratio is also small due to the Lyth bound. Indeed, we will see that this expectation turns out to be true. The φ4 potential in the standard ”cold” inflation is ruled out since it predicts a too large tensor-to-scalar ratio; on the other hand, Warm inflation in Two-Time Physics 7 the φ4 potential in warm inflation works perfectly well since the predicted tensor-to-scalar ratio in this model is much smaller. However, both of them use the slow rolling approximation 3. The slow-roll parameters are defined as[15] M 2 V ′ 2 V ′′ ǫ = p ; η = M 2 , 2 V p V where Mp is 4D Planck scale and primes denote derivatives with respect to ϕ. In warm inflation, we have two cases which are the weak and the strong dissipative regimes defined as R 1 and R 1, respectively: ≪ ≫ Γ R = , (23) 3H where H is the Hubble parameter and Γ is the inflaton decay rate. For the warm inflation, in addition to the two usual slow-roll parameters, we have the following two parameters [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21], Γ′V ′ V ′ β = M 2 ,σ = M 2 . (24) p ΓV p ϕV The slow-roll conditions can be expressed as [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21] ǫ, η , β , σ 1+ R. (25) | | | | | |≪ In order to make sure that the potential V ϕ4 is still reliable, we need to calculate ∼ two important quantities, which are the scalar spectral index ns and the tensor-to-scalar ratio r. To do that, we first need to mention an important quantity in inflation which is the e-folding number N representing the amount of inflation. In the context of potential slow-roll approximation, the e-folding number is a(t ) 8π ϕf V (1 + R) N ln f dϕ . (26) ≡ a(t ) ≃−M 2 V ′ i 4 Zϕi From the condition of inflation to end ǫ 1+ R, we get the final value of the inflaton ∼ field ϕf . Then, using Eq. (26) to calculate the initial value of the inflaton field ϕi when the perturbations exit the horizon. Therefore, ns and r can be expressed in terms of the slow-roll parameters and assuming an inflaton decay rate Γ = aT . Finally, with the inflation at 60 e-folds, one gets 10−15 <ρ< 10−13 in all case [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Considering our assumption in (20) to fit the SP (2,R) symmetry, the Dilaton potential has the quartic form. Thus, this form is compatible with a warm inflation scenario. A quartic inflaton potential in the warm inflation scenario has also been studied in [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Meanwhile, the mass of dilaton has around a few hundred which we chose the range 200 GeV . md . 600 GeV (this is also consistent with the research in Ref.[30]). Therefore, from (22), we have two cases: α is large and small.

3 1 2 Slow-roll approximation states that 2 ϕ˙ ≪ V , and therefore ǫ, |η|≪ 1. Slow-roll approximation is the must for inﬂation to happen. There are two formalisms of slow-roll approximation which are potential slow-roll approximation (PSRA) and Hubble slow-roll approximation (HSRA). In this paper, we will always use the former. 8 Vo Quoc Phong and Ngo Phuc Duc Loc

The ﬁrst case (large α): we obtain the range of λ and α in the Higgs-Dilaton potential, as shown in Fig.1. The range of values of the parameter α characterizing the interaction between Higgs and Dilaton is relatively wide. However, based on Fig. 1, in order to ensure the ﬁrst-order EWPT, the larger the α, the smaller the λ, and vice versa. Since the Higgs mass is 125 GeV, we infer λ = 0.1293. We then deduce the values of α parameters which are orange dots in Fig.1, as shown in Table 1. Because ρ is so small, the larger the mass of Dilaton, the larger α.

Λ=0.1293 8

m_d=625 GeV

6 Α m_d=530 GeV

4 m_d=420 GeV

2 m_d=200 GeV

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Λ

Fig. 1. Contours and dots for large α corresponding to the mass of Higgs is equal to 125 GeV (or λ =0.1293) and ρ = 10−14.

md[GeV ] 200 420 530 600 625 α 1.598 3.357 4.236 4.796 4.996 Table 1. The large values of coupling constant between Higgs and Dilaton with diﬀerent values of md.

The second case (small α): with λ = 0.1293, we then deduce the values of α parameters which are blue dots in Fig.2, as shown in Table 2. Because ρ is so small, the mass of Dilaton increases, α must be smaller than 2.13 10−7. × Warm inﬂation in Two-Time Physics 9

md[GeV ] 200 420 530 600 625 α 2.13 10−7 1.014 10−7 8.039 10−8 7.101 10−8 6.817 10−8 × × × × × Table 2. The small values of coupling constant between Higgs and Dilaton with diﬀerent values of md.

2.5 ´ 10-7 Λ=0.1293

m_d=200 GeV 2. ´ 10-7

´ -7

Α 1.5 10

1. ´ 10-7 m_d=420 GeV

m_d=530 GeV

m_d=625 GeV 5. ´ 10-8 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Λ

Fig. 2. Contours and dots for small α corresponding to the mass of Higgs is equal to 125 GeV (or λ =0.1293) and ρ = 10−14.

IV. Conclusion and discussion With the mass of Dilaton in the range of several hundred GeV, we showed that it can be a candidate of Inflaton in the warm inflation scenario. Accordingly, the parameter domain of the Higgs-Dilaton potential is retrieved. This indirectly shows that extra dimensions can play an important role in the inflation problem. The Higgs-Dilaton potential can be added φ2 that is the dominant component of the standard inflation, thus a dimensional mass parameter can be added along with φ2. But it breaks the basic Sp(2; R) symmetry. This parameter can be derived from the interaction of Dilaton with S(x) which is an additional scalar field, can be seen as Inflaton [22, 23, 24]. This has been done consistently with the scale invariance required by 2T-Physics Ref.[25]. There are the other studies in Cosmology, ror example, the cosmological constant and inflation [28, 29]. But in this model, the inflation and reheating period have not 10 Vo Quoc Phong and Ngo Phuc Duc Loc been analyzed in detail. We considered that Dilaton is Inflaton in the warm scenario. This presents another opportunity to study extra dimensions as well as other inflationary scenarios. The extra dimensional phenomena can give many prediction for experiments. Our next work focuses on extra dimensions, in order to describe their properties in the baryogenesis or leptongenesis scenario and cosmology problems. The 2T model is a hologram of string theory and has a connection with SM. There- fore, analyzing and refining this model is a ”road” to create a good bridge between two theories, in which the problem of inflation and the matter-antimatter asymmetry are sig- nificant problems. New physical effects from the interaction between Higgs and Dilaton may change the electroweak, but this model still fits into the standard model through the Bars transformation that has been mentioned in section II.2. Thus, these changes (such as the Higgs couplings to fermions) will indeed provide new explanations for difficult problems (such as Baryogenesis, etc. ) without changing the electroweak nature. In a context with too many free parameters, the first step in our paper shows that the small Dilaton potential can be combined with the warm inflation problem, and then derive the parameter domain α. If further extended to other problems, the range of values α that is derived in this paper, need to be confirmed more fully.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Dr. Vo Thanh Van for his support and encouragement.

REFERENCES [1] I. Bars, C. Deliduman and D. Mimic, Phys. Rev. D 59, 125004 (1999). [2] I. Bars, Phys. Rev. D 62, 046007 (2000). [3] I. Bars, AIP conference proceedings 607, 17 (2002). [4] I. Bars, Class. and Quantum Grav. 18, 3113-3130 (2001). [5] I. Bars, Phys. Rev. D 74, 085019 (2006). [6] I. Bars and Y-C. Kuo, Phys. Rev. D 74 085020 (2006). [7] I. Bars , Phys.Rev.D 74, 085019 (2006). [8] Alan H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981). [9] F.L. Bezrukov, M.E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B 659: 703-706 (2008). [10] Seiga Sato and Kei-ichi Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 97, 083512 (2018). [11] Ryusuke Jinno, Kunio Kaneta, and Kin-ya Oda, Phys. Rev. D 97, 023523 (2018). [12] I. Bars, C. Deliduman, O. Andreev, Phys. Rev. D 58, 066004 (1998). [13] J. R. Espinosa, B. Gripaios, T. Konstandin and F. Riva, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys 01, 012 (2012). [14] J. M. Cline and K. Kainulainen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys 1 012, 1210-4196 (2013). [15] J. E. Lidsey, A. R. Liddle, E. W. Kolb, E. J. Copeland, T. Barreiro, M. Abney, Rev. Mod. Phys.69:373- 410 (1997). [16] M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R.O. Ramos, JCAP 1107, 030 (2011). [17] S. Bartrum, M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. Cerezo, R.O. Ramos, J.G. Rosa, Phys. Lett. B 732, 116 (2014). [18] M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, I.G. Moss, R.O. Ramos, JCAP 1405, 004 (2014). [19] Erandy Ramirez and Dominik J. Schwarz, Phys.Rev.D 80, 023525 (2009). [20] Grigorios Panotopoulos, Nelson Videla, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 525 (2015). [21] V. V. Kiselev, S. A. Timofeev, arXiv:0801.2453v3 [gr-qc] (2008). Warm inﬂation in Two-Time Physics 11

[22] I. Bars, P. Steinhardt, Neil Turok, Phys.Rev.D 89, 043515 (2014). [23] I. Bars, Phys.Rev.D 77, 125027 (2008). [24] I. Bars, S-H Chen, Phys.Rev.D 79 085021 (2009). [25] I. Bars, Phys.Rev.D 82, 125025 (2010). [26] I. Bars, Phys.Rev.D 59, 045019 (1999). [27] I. Bars, S-H Chen, G. Quelin, Phys.Rev.D 76, 065016 (2007). [28] Y. Fujii, Prog. Theor. Phys.110, 433-439 (2003). [29] M. Pauly, J.Rubio, Phys. Rev. D 97, 043520 (2018). [30] Vo Quoc Phong and Dam Quang Nam, arXiv:1901.04235v5 [hep-ph] [31] Arjun Berera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3218 (1995).

Received July 6, 2021.