The Emerging Utility of the Cutaneous Microbiome in the Treatment of Acne and Atopic Dermatitis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal Pre-proof The emerging utility of the cutaneous microbiome in the treatment of acne and atopic dermatitis Taylor E. Woo, MSc, Christopher D. Sibley, MD, PhD, FRCPC PII: S0190-9622(19)32686-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.078 Reference: YMJD 13802 To appear in: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Received Date: 14 May 2019 Revised Date: 21 August 2019 Accepted Date: 28 August 2019 Please cite this article as: Woo TE, Sibley CD, The emerging utility of the cutaneous microbiome in the treatment of acne and atopic dermatitis, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.078. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. 1 Title: The emerging utility of the cutaneous microbiome in the treatment of acne 2 and atopic dermatitis 3 4 Authors: Taylor E. Woo MSc 1 and Christopher D. Sibley MD, PhD, FRCPC 2 5 6 1. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, CAN 7 2. South Ottawa Medical Centre, Ottawa, ON, CAN 8 9 Corresponding Author: 10 Mr. Taylor Woo 11 University of Calgary 12 E: [email protected] 13 Funding Sources: None 14 15 Conflict of Interest: None disclosed 16 17 Word Count: 18 Abstract (168), Capsule Summary (37), Text (2254), Figures (1), Tables (2), 19 References (52) 20 Keywords: microbiome, biotherapy, acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis 21 22 23 24 25 Abstract 26 The cutaneous microbiome has potential for therapeutic intervention in 27 inflammatory-driven skin disease. Research into atopic dermatitis and acne vulgaris has 28 highlighted the importance of the skin microbiota in disease pathogenesis, 29 prognostication and targets for therapeutic intervention. Current management of these 30 conditions aims to control the inflammatory response thought to be associated with 31 specific pathogens using both topical and systemic antimicrobials. However, commensal 32 microbiota found naturally on the skin have been shown to play an important role in the 33 resolution of disease flares. While often efficacious, the mainstay treatments are not 34 without side effects and raise concerns regarding the development of antimicrobial 35 resistance. Augmentation of microbial communities with targeted biotherapy could 36 revolutionize the way inflammatory conditions of the skin are treated. Herein, we review 37 evidence for the role of the cutaneous microbiome in atopic dermatitis and acne vulgaris 38 and suggest that these conditions highlight the potential for microbiome-directed 39 therapeutics. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Capsule Summary 49 • Cutaneous microorganisms are implicated in the pathophysiology of both acne 50 and atopic dermatitis. 51 • Interventions targeting the cutaneous microbiome are a promising area of 52 therapeutics in acne vulgaris and atopic dermatitis. 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Introduction 72 Rapid advances in nucleic acid sequencing technologies have enabled the 73 detection of a large number of eukaryotes, bacteria, viruses and other microorganisms, 74 which collectively compose the human microbiome. Skin is the largest human organ 75 (~1.8 m 2) and serves as a physical and immunological barrier to the environment. This 76 interface, with plentiful folds, invaginations and specialized niches, is a harsh 77 environment for microbes with its cool temperature, an acidic pH and a milieu of host 78 defense molecules (proteases, lysozyme and antimicrobial peptides) 1,2 . Despite these 79 conditions, human mucosal surfaces and skin harbor more commensal microbes than the 80 number of eukaryotic cells in the body 3. To maintain human health an interplay between 81 the host’s innate immune system and the microbial communities must transpire 2,4 . A 82 wide breadth of microbial species is organized into complex microbial communities on 83 the skin. The density of these communities is an estimated one million bacteria per 84 centimeter squared 5 and their demographics vary depending on the body site involved 6. 85 Areas such as hair follicles, sebaceous and glandular structures represent unique 86 environmental niches for the colonization of microorganisms. Nineteen phyla represent 87 the core skin microbiome 6 including Actinobacteria (51.8%), Firmicutes (24.4%), 88 Proteobacteria (16.5%) and Bacteroidetes (6.3). At the genus level, Corynebacterium , 89 Propionibacterium and Staphylococcus are most commonly identified. 90 Both commensal and pathogenic microorganisms have been suggested to play an 91 important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory skin conditions 7. Recent evidence 92 suggests that commensal microbial metabolites contribute to local homeostasis by 93 influencing host cell gene expression 8. Disruption of the balance between the microbiome 94 and the host can lead to a pro-inflammatory environment and the development of clinical 95 disease 9. The transition to a pro-inflammatory state in the skin is often associated with 96 changes in the microbial richness (total number of bacterial species) and evenness (the 97 relative proportion of microorganisms in a community) 10 . Disruption of the normal 98 microbiome homeostasis manifests in atopic dermatitis and acne vulgaris as decreased 99 richness, a decrease in the total bacterial load, or altered evenness 11,12 . As such, targeted 100 interventions focused on restoring the microbial community to a stable anti-inflammatory 101 state are of great interest and represent a shift in the way we manage and treat 102 inflammatory skin disease (Figure 1). 103 Atopic dermatitis is a disease of microbial dysbiosis 104 Atopic dermatitis is a chronic condition contributing to significant morbidity in 105 approximately 7% of the general population 13 . It’s pathogenesis is multifactorial, with 106 important genetic and environmental factors. Atopic dermatitis is highly heritable 14 and 107 most often secondary to loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene 15 . A notable 108 modifiable environmental risk factor, which has been implicated in the exacerbation of 109 disease is the composition and dynamics of commensal skin microbiota that can be 110 associated with more severe clinical presentations 11 . Specifically, an inverse relationship 111 between baseline Shannon diversity (a measurement which takes into account both 112 species richness and evenness of a sample) and the severity of atopic dermatitis has been 113 well documented. For instance, individuals who have lower measures of diversity have 114 more severe disease as compared to healthy controls, which coincides with an 115 overgrowth of Staphylococcus aureus 11 . This corresponds with a decrease in the relative 116 abundance of Streptococcus , Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium . Moreover, 117 resolution of acute flare correlates with the reestablishment of a commensal community 118 with a rich and even structure. 119 S. aureus has a diverse range of virulence factors that contribute to the 120 pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis 16–18 . Virulence factors include superantigen production, 121 which promotes inflammatory pathways through the activation of interleukin-mediated T 122 cell responses 19,20 . While the role of S. aureus in invoking inflammatory responses is 123 clear, understanding how S. aureus interacts with the resident commensal microbiota is of 124 great clinical interest. Milder forms of atopic dermatitis are seen in patients when S. 125 aureus is not the predominant organism 21 . In these cases, patients are colonized 126 predominantly by S. epidermidis , suggesting a broader antagonistic relationship between 127 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and S. aureus 22 . In addition, Cutibacterium acnes also 128 appears to have an antagonistic relationship with S. aureus 23 . Likely, these observations 129 are due to the ability of commensal microbiota to inhibit the growth of S. aureus through 130 the fermentation of compounds occurring naturally on the skin. Many of the members of 131 the cutaneous microbiome can metabolize glycerol into antimicrobial compounds, which 132 inhibit S. aureus growth 22–24 . This degree of interaction extends beyond the context of 133 atopic dermatitis, suggesting that commensal organisms may attenuate the virulence of S. 134 aureus in polymicrobial diabetic foot infections 25 . 135 136 137 138 139 140 Acne vulgaris is a clinical morphology of pro-inflammatory microbial communities 141 The pathogenesis of acne highlights the interplay between skin microbiota and 142 inflammatory disease. The pathophysiology of acne involves abnormal follicular 143 hyperkeratinization, excessive sebum production, colonization by C. acnes (recently 144 reclassified from Propionibacterium acnes 26 ) and subsequent activation of an 145 inflammatory cascade 27 . Formation of comedones or inflammatory papules, pustules and 146 nodules are a significant source of morbidity and are associated with depressive 147 symptoms, including lower self-attitude,