DOCSLIB.ORG

Is HIV Really the Cause of AIDS?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is HIV Really the Cause of AIDS? Is “HIV” Really the Cause of AIDS And Are There Really Only “A Few” Scientists Who Doubt This? Over 1,000 scientists, medical professionals, authors and academics are on record that the “HIV-causes-AIDS” theories, routinely reported to the public as if they were facts, are dubious to say the least. View the list “It’s not even probable, let alone scientifically proven, that HIV causes AIDS. If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There are no such documents.” Spin Magazine, Vol. 10 No.4, 1994 “The HIV-causes-AIDS theory is one hell of a mistake.” Foreword, “Inventing the AIDS Virus” “Years from now, people will find our acceptance of the HIV theory of AIDS as silly as we find those who excommunicated Galileo.” “Dancing Naked in the Mind Field,” 1998 “Where is the research that says HIV is the cause of AIDS? There are 10,000 people in the world now who specialize in HIV. None has any interest in the possibility HIV doesn’t cause AIDS because if it doesn’t, their expertise is useless.” “People keep asking me, ‘You mean you don’t believe that HIV causes AIDS?’ And I say, ‘Whether I believe it or not is irrelevant! I have no scientific evidence for it.’ I might believe in God, and He could have told me in a dream that HIV causes AIDS. But I wouldn’t stand up in front of scientists and say, ‘I believe HIV causes AIDS because God told me.’ I’d say, ‘I have papers here in hand and experiments that have been done that can be demonstrated to others.’ It’s not what somebody believes, it’s experimental proof that counts. And those guys don’t have that.” California Monthly, Sept 1994 “If you think a virus is the cause of AIDS, do a control without it. To do a control is the first thing you teach undergraduates. But it hasn’t been done. The epidemiology of AIDS is a pile of anecdotal stories selected to the virus- AIDS hypothesis. People don’t bother to check the details of popular dogma or consensus views.” HIV not Guilty, Oct 5, 1996 — Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing the polymerase chain reaction, the basis for the HIV viral load tests. “The HIV hypothesis of AIDS is the biggest scientific, medical blunder of the 20th Century. The evidence is overwhelming that AIDS is not contagious, sexually transmitted, or caused by HIV. The physicians who know or suspect the truth are embarrassed or afraid to admit that the HIV tests are absurd and should be outlawed, and that the anti-HIV drugs are injuring and killing people.” Mail & Guardian, Johannesburg, SA, Jan 24, 2001 “As a scientist who has studied AIDS for 16 years, I have determined that AIDS has little to do with science and is not even primarily a medical issue. AIDS is a sociological phenomenon held together by fear, creating a kind of medical McCarthyism that has transgressed and collapsed all the rules of science, and has imposed a brew of belief and pseudoscience on a vulnerable public.” Spin, June 1997 “Fifty percent of Africans have no sewage systems. Their drinking water mixes with animal and human waste. They have constant TB and malaria infections, the symptoms of which are diarrhea and weight loss, the very same criteria UNAIDS and the World Health Organization use to diagnose AIDS in Africa. These people need clean drinking water and treated mosquito nets [mosquitoes carry malaria], not condoms and lectures and deadly pharmaceuticals forced on pregnant mothers.” Scheff, AIDS Debate, Boston Dig, 2003 “We’ve put 20 years and $118 billion into HIV. We’ve got no cure, no vaccine and no progress. Instead we have thousands of people made sick and even killed by toxic AIDS drugs. But we can’t just treat them for the diseases we know they have because if we do, we’re called ‘AIDS denialists.’ AIDS is a multi-billion dollar industry. There are 100,000 professional AIDS researchers in this country. It’s as hard to challenge as big tobacco at this point.” Scheff “Those damn [HIV] tests should be outlawed. They’re lethal. First of all, it’s a death sentence in South Africa. People commit suicide, they’ve been stoned to death, they’ve had their houses burned down, they’ve been murdered. Just for having antibodies to HIV. They have been ostracized. And in certain rural communities, ostracism is equivalent to death. So you’re scared to death, first of all. And then you start taking the anti-HIV drugs, which cause AIDS, and if you take them long enough they will kill you.” New York Press, vol. 14, no. 16, 2002 “In 1990 at the San Francisco AIDS conference, [HIV co- discoverer Luc] Montagnier announced that HIV did not, after all, kill T-cells and could not be the cause of AIDS. Within hours of making this announcement, he was attacked by the very industry he’d helped to create.” Scheff “People can have a high viral load and be healthy and have a low viral load and be sick and everything in between. These guys [AIDS researchers] will admit this amoung themselves, they just don’t admit it publicly.” Gear Magazine, March 2000 “The National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, the Medical Research Council, and the World Health Organization are terrorizing hundreds of millions of people around the world by their reckless and absurd policy of equating sex with death. Linking sex to death has put these organizations in an impossible situation. It would be intolerably embarrassing for them to admit at this late date that they are wrong, that AIDS is not sexually transmitted. Such an admission could very well destroy these organizations or at the very least put their future credibility in jeopardy. Self preservation compels these institutions to not only maintain but to actually compound their errors, which adds to the fear, suffering, and misery of the world — the antithesis of their reason for being.” British Medical Journal Rapid Response, 18 April 2003 — Dr. David Rasnick, PhD, Biochemist, Protease Inhibitor Developer, University of California “The HIV-causes-AIDS dogma is the grandest fraud that has ever been perpetrated on young men and women of the Western world. AIDS is a cruel deception that is maintained because so many people are making money from it. Take away this money and the entire system of mythology will collapse.” Sunday Times, London, 3 April 1994 “I think that Duesberg and Root-Bernstein have it right [about what causes AIDS]. Anything or process that destroys the individual’s ability to mount an immune response…This could be the use of…cocaine, heroin, amyl nitrite (poppers), amphetamines...malnutrition and lack of essential vitamins…being the recipient of whole blood or blood products…repeated and multiple infections… [all] are immunosuppressive.” “Kimberly Bergalis, according to the general press, was a young lady who was found to have antibody to HIV…she was put on AZT [AIDS medicine]…the AZT killed her.” “Ryan White was an 18-year-old hemophiliac who died in April of 1990 of unstoppable internal bleeding which may have been exacerbated by the AZT he was taking.” “…Even after many years not one [HIV-infected] chimp has come down with AIDS diseases. This means we have an animal model for HIV, and it does not seem to cause AIDS.” “…By the most sensitive PCR and culture procedures, no virus can be detected in 90% of the semen samples taken from men with AIDS.” Rethinking AIDS May 1993 “The reason that the whole shabby story of HIV is being held in place is there’s so much money riding on it. The federal government is spending about $4 billion on just this single subject, and all that $4 billion is predicated on the idea that HIV causes these diseases. If HIV does not cause these diseases, then that money is being wasted. And I believe it is being wasted. But the people who are the recipients of that money don’t want it to stop.” “I often wonder what would happen if all federal money for AIDS—education, research, treatment, and so forth—was suddenly dropped to zero. It’s my belief that AIDS would go away. In other words, the AIDS diseases that we see today would be reassigned to their former categories—pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, Kaposi’s sarcoma, and the other 25 or so different diseases, now including cervical dysplasia and so forth. AIDS has been a disease of definition. If we said that it didn’t exist and didn’t pay for it with taxpayers’ money, it would disappear into the background of normal mortality.” Penthouse Magazine, April 1995 “Sex is no more dangerous today than 20 years ago—or 1,000 years ago.” Rethinking AIDS May 1993 — Dr. Charles Thomas, PhD, former Professor of Biochemistry, Harvard and Johns Hopkins Universities. Former chair of the Cell Biology Department, Scripps Research Institute “I do not believe that HIV, in and of itself, can cause AIDS.” New York Daily News Sep 20, 1993 “The assumption was made in 1984 that HIV caused AIDS and this has scarcely been challenged since. We don’t really know if HIV causes AIDS, nor have we seriously tried to find out.” Virusmyth.net, Nov. 1991 “It will surely lead to a scientifically healthier society if the burden of proof for HIV as a deadly pathogen is returned to where it belongs — to those who maintain that HIV causes AIDS — and others are allowed to pursue alternative approaches in the battle for eradication of the disease.” Nature, 20 April 1989 — Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction Chaptar
    NOTES Introduction 1. David T. Bazelon, The Paper Economy (NY: Random House, 1963), p. 64. 2. Peter Newcomb, "The Richest People in America," Forbes (October 11, 1999): 169. 3. Michael J. Mandel, "How the Super-Rich Lucked Out Twice: New Data Show the Top Earners Are Already Enjoying Lower Rates," Business week (May 14, 2001): 52. 4. Erika Btown, Doug Donovan, Joanne Gordon, and Peter Newcomb, "Global Billionaires," ForbesOuly5,1999). 5. Bittlingmayer and Hazlett 2000 coined the expression DOS Capital. See George Bittlingmayer and Thomas W. Hazlett, "DOS Kapital: Has Antitrust Action Against Microsoft Created Value in the Computer Industry?," Journal ofFinancial Economics, Vol. 55, No.3 (March 2000): 329-59. 6. Newcomb, "The Richest People in America," p. 169. 7. United Nations Development Programme, Globalization with a Human Face: United Nations Human Development Report (NY: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 68. 8. Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. 1 (NY: Vintage, 1977), p. 496. 9. Michael A. Perelman, Class Warfare in the Information Age (NY: St. Martin's Press, 1998). 10. Davoll v. Brown, 7 F. Case. 197 (Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts 1845). 11. Mitchell v. Tilghman, 86 U.S. 287. 12. Supreme Court decision 1949: CIR. v. Wodehouse, 337 U.S. 369. Chaptar Dna 1. Robert P. Merges, "The Economic Impact ofIntellectual Property Rights: An Overview and Guide," Journal ofCultural Economics, Vol. 19, No.2 (1995): 106. 2. Edith T. Pentose, The Economics of the International Patent System (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1951), p. 2. 3. Daniel Defoe, A Plan of English Commerce (London: C. Rivington; Kress Goldsmith Collection, Reel 407, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental White Paper
    Institute for Science in Medicine WHITE PAPER THE ANTI-FLUORIDATIONIST THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH PREPARED BY JOHN E. DODES, DDS, FISM AND MICHAEL W. EASLEY, DDS, MPH, FISM APRIL 2012 Institute for Science in Medicine (ISM) is an international, educational and public-policy or- ganization comprised of health care professionals, scientists, and researchers who agree that the best science available should be used to determine health policy and to establish a standard of care that both protects and promotes the public health. We necessarily oppose policies which erode a science-based standard of care and thereby significantly expose the public to fraudulent, worthless, or harmful medical practices and products. Copyright 2012 by Institute for Science in Medicine. Permission to reproduce in its entirety is hereby granted, provided that it is not altered, not distributed for commercial purposes, and this notice is in- cluded. All other rights are reserved. White Paper: The Anti-Fluoridationist Threat to Public Health Declared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be one of the ten greatest public- health achievements of the Twentieth Century,1 community water fluoridation has been under attack by a small band of critics since its inception. The scientific consensus over fluoridation’s health benefits, safety, social justice, and economies has been firmly established over six decades of widespread use in the United States and elsewhere. Nevertheless, anti-science critics have never relented in their opposition — recycling previously disproven charges of harm, inventing new ones out of whole cloth, misrepresenting scientific facts and research, exaggerating risks, understating benefits, inappropriately invoking the precautionary principle, and accusing public health officials of corruption, conspiracy, and ‘mass medication’ of whole populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Page 1 “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” Mark Twain’s quote is more relevant than ever in times of online communication, where information or misinformation, bundled in bits and bytes, streams around the earth within seconds. SUMMARY This UNICEF working paper aims to track and analyse online anti-vaccination sentiment in social media networks by examining conversations across social media in English, Russian, Romanian and Polish. The findings support the assumption that parents actively use social networks and blogs to inform their decisions on vaccinating their children. The paper proposes a research model that detects and clusters commonly-used keywords and intensity of user interaction. The end goal is the development of targeted and efficient engagement strategies for health and communication experts in the field as well as for partner organisations. DISCLAIMER UNICEF working papers aim to facilitate greater exchange of knowledge and stimulate analytical discussion on an issue. This text has not been edited to official publications standards. Extracts from this paper may be freely reproduced with due acknowledgement. For the purposes of this research, no personal data has been extracted and stored for data collection and analysis. Page 2 CONTENT 1. Rationale 4 2. Introduction 5 2.1 Social Media: the conversation shift 5 2.2 Social Media: Fertile ground for anti- 5 vaccination sentiment 2.3 Social Media Monitoring 7 2.4 Influencers 8 3. Research Objectives 9 4. Methodology 11 4.1 Descriptive and Explorative Research Design 11 4.2 Data Collection 12 4.3 Limitations 13 4.4 Ethical Considerations 13 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Dangers of Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination: a Special Interview with Barbara Loe Fisher by Dr
    Possible Dangers of Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination: A Special Interview With Barbara Loe Fisher By Dr. Joseph Mercola Dr. Mercola Welcome everyone, Dr. Mercola, helping you take control of your health and today we're joined with a veteran, the famous Barbara Loe Fisher, who is the co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), which is one of the best organizations out there, certainly one of the oldest providing objective, non-biased information about vaccines to help people make an informed choice about whether or not they want to participate in the vaccine program. Welcome and thank you for joining us today because we've got loads of information to discuss since the last time we talked. Barbara Loe Fisher: That's so true. Dr. Mercola [Crosstalk 00:00:38]. Barbara Loe Fisher: In a way, it's a culmination what's happened this year of everything we have been talking about for the last decade. I know back in 1993, I started to predict that the day would come when Americans would not be able to participate in society without showing proof they've been vaccinated with whatever the government says they have to be vaccinated with, and I think we're most definitely heading that way right now. It's been unprecedented what's happened in this country, and really around the world since January. Dr. Mercola A very clever and sophisticated strategy to implement that goal, for sure, and most of us or many of us believe it was planned for certain. I think that is probably the main topic of discussion, and there's so many other things that we can go on and tangents to it, but it's this mandatory vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Oncogenes: the Advent of Molecular Cancer Research
    COMMENTARY COMMENTARY Discovery of oncogenes: The advent of molecular cancer research Klaus Bister1 structural comparisons of the a and b subunits Institute of Biochemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences, University of Innsbruck, of biologically cloned viruses, the transforming A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria principle was defined by the remarkably simple equation a − b = x and was later termed src td (for sarcoma). The first biochemical identifi- In their classic paper on the identification of defective ( ) mutant derivatives, they found cation of a cancer gene was achieved, initially the transforming principle of Rous sarcoma that all transforming virus stocks contained in a chicken virus. However, the principal proof virus (RSV) published 1970 in PNAS (1), two classes of RNA subunits, a larger one a b of a physical underpinning of the cancer gene Peter Duesberg at the University of California, ( ) and a smaller one ( ), whereas the non- hypothesis had tremendous impact on a fun- Berkeley, and Peter Vogt, then at the University transforming yet replication-competent mu- damental challenge of medicine, decoding the of Washington, Seattle, drew a seemingly sim- tants contained the smaller b subunits only. a molecular basis of human carcinogenesis. ple yet groundbreaking conclusion. When they Duesberg and Vogt concluded that the larger The genetic and biochemical investiga- analyzed the genomic RNAs of transforming, subunit contained the transforming princi- tions of the chicken tumor virus RSV and the acutely oncogenic RSV and of transformation- ple of RSV. Based on this and on subsequent persistent search for its transforming prin- ciple are a classic paradigm in cellular and molecular cancer research (2, 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief
    Case: 1:16-cv-04282 Document #: 2 Filed: 04/13/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 16 CV 4282 Plaintiff, v. COMPLAINT FOR MERCOLA.COM, LLC, a limited liability PERMANENT company, INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF MERCOLA.COM HEALTH RESOURCES, LLC, a limited liability company, and DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA, individually and as an owner, officer, and director of MERCOLA.COM, LLC, and MERCOLA.COM HEALTH RESOURCES, LLC, Defendants. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), for its Complaint alleges: 1. The FTC brings this action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), to obtain a permanent injunction, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for Defendants’ acts or practices in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a) and 52, in connection with the labeling, advertising, marketing, distribution, and sale of Mercola brand indoor tanning systems. 1 Case: 1:16-cv-04282 Document #: 2 Filed: 04/13/16 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:3 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), and 1345, and 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b). 3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), (c)(1), (c)(2), and (d), and 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV an Illusion Toxic Shock
    SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE generated from a linear model could be a and Ho's] data is remarkable", note that vmons per day is not defined or function of both the baseline CD4 level Loveday et al. 8 report the use of a PCR­ addressed, nor can it be! No one else has and viral loads. Further studies with larg­ based assay and find only 200 HIV "virion access to either the unapproved drugs or er sample sizes are needed to resolve RNAs" per ml of serum of AIDS patients the branch PCR technology! What is the these discrepancies. - 1,000 times less than Ho and Wei. So benchmark rate for the turnover of CD4 Shenghan Lai, J. Bryan Page, Hong Lai much for the "remarkable concordance". cells in the general population? Departments of Medicine, Peter Duesberg To counter the 42 case studies of Wei et Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Department of Molecular and Cellular al. 1 and Ho et al.2, we at HEAL (Health University of Miami School of Medicine, Biology, University of California, Education AIDS Liason) can provide at Miami, Florida 33136, USA Berkeley, California 94720, USA least 42 people who are western-blot-posi­ Harvey Bialy tive for 'HIV', have low T4 cells, who are Bio/Technology, New York, not using orthodox procedures, and have HIV an illusion New York 10010, USA been healthy for years! On the other 1. Maddox, J. Nature 373, 189 (1995). hand, we can also provide you with hun­ SIR - In an editorial' in the 19 January 2. Ho, D.D. et al. Nature 373, 123-126 (1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Unaids Programme Coordinating Board
    UNAIDS PROGRAMME COORDINATING BOARD UNAIDS/PCB(33)/13.CRP5 Issue date: 10 December 2013 THIRTY-THIRD MEETING Date: 17-19 December 2013 Venue: Executive Board Room, WHO, Geneva Agenda item 9 PCB Submissions on Thematic Segment - HIV, Adolescents and Youth 1 Disclaimer: This compilation of submissions is for information only. With the exception of minor corrections to grammar and spelling, the submissions within this document are presented as they were submitted, and do not, implied or otherwise, express or suggest endorsement, a relationship with or support by UNAIDS and its mandate and/or any of its co-sponsors, Member States and civil society. The content of submissions has not been independently verified. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNAIDS concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Nor does the content of the submissions necessarily represent the views of Member States, civil society, the UNAIDS Secretariat or the UNAIDS Cosponsors. The published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall UNAIDS be liable for damages arising from its use. UNAIDS expressly disclaims any responsibility for inadvertent offensive or insensitive, perceived or actual, language. 2 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………….……………………….……………. Page 9 I. Africa 104 submissions…………………………………………………………………………. Page 9 – 149 1. Algeria: Establishment of Three Animated Prevention Clubs against HIV in the Youth Community 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Book
    Program Book Page 1 Visit BD at Booth 105 BD MAX™ Vaginal Panel One clinician- or patient-collected vaginal swab provides results for the three most common causes of vaginitis – bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV)1. BD MAX Vaginal Panel detects DNA from In addition, BD MAX Vaginal Panel utilizes the the following BV markers: CDC-recommended diagnostic technology for T. vaginalis detection2 and provides three results for microorganisms responsible for Lactobacillus spp. yeast infections: G. vaginalis • group, including C. albicans, C. A. vaginae Candida L. jensenii parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. dubliniensis L. crispatus BVAB-2 Megasphaera-1 • Differentiates fungal species – C. glabrata Anaerobic spp. and C. krusei – associated with antimicrobial resistance3. The BD MAX™ Women’s Health and STI portfolio is focused on providing accurate, reliable results that enable clinicians and labs to elevate patient care. • BD MAX™ Vaginal Panel • BD MAX™ CT/GC/TV • BD MAX™ GBS Reference 1. BD MAX Vaginal Panel Package Insert 2. CDC (2015, June). MMWR Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. Mills, BB (2017) Vaginitis: Beyond the Basics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 44(2):159-177. 3. Gaydos CA (2017) Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis. Obstet Gynecol. 130(1):181-189. BD, the BD Logo and the BD MAX are trademarks of Becton, Dickinson and Company or its affiliates. © 2019 BD. All rights reserved. April 2019. Page 2 MAX MVP AD_5_5x8_5_GreenJournalAd_April.indd
    [Show full text]
  • CARL ZIMMER Author & Journalist
    CARL ZIMMER Author & journalist carlzimmer.com @carlzimmer BIOGRAPHY The New York Times Book Review calls Carl Zimmer "as fine a science essayist as we have." He is the author of thirteen acclaimed books and a columnist for the New York Times. Zimmer first be- gan writing about science at Discover, where he served for five years as a senior editor, and has gone on to write hundreds of features for magazines including The Atlantic, The New York Times Magazine, Time, National Geographic, and Scientific American. He has also served as a scientific editor for television documentaries, consulted on museum exhibits, and contributed his writing to major science web sites. Zimmer has earned numerous honors for his work. In 2007 he won the National Academies Communication Award, and he has won the American Association for the Advancement of Sci- ences Science Journalism Award three times. In 2015, Zimmer won the Distinguished Service Award from the National Association of Biology Teachers, and in 2016, he won the Stephen Jay Gould Prize, awarded by the Society for the Study of Evolution. In 2018, Zimmer’s book She Has Her Mother’s Laugh was named by Publisher’s Weekly one of the ten best books of the year. The Guardian named it the best science book of 2018 and The New York Times Book Review chose it as a Notable Book of the Year. It was short-listed for the Baillie-Gifford Prize for Nonfiction and a fi- nalist for the PEN/E.O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Prize. His articles have been antholo- gized in both The Best American Science and Nature Writing series and The Best American Science Writing series.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from an HIV Denialist in the Hills of Thailand
    Lessons from an HIV denialist in the hills of Thailand Brian Chang Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA I spent a month volunteering with Dr. Mark,* a physician in community. Further, denialist movements often go beyond science, the hill tribe villages of northern Thailand, in the summer of 2010. becoming “a social movement in which large numbers of people He was born in Myanmar, graduated from medical school in India come together and propound their views with missionary zeal.”3 and founded a small grassroots organization dedicated to the health HIV/AIDS denialism itself exists in a spectrum, ranging from of hill tribe villagers. He spent the last five years moving from village the rejection of the fact that HIV is a virus, to the denial of the caus- to village along the mountainous Thai-Burmese border, working on ative relationship between HIV and AIDS. I read arguments from sanitation projects and seeing patients in makeshift clinics. He is hard Dr. Peter Duesberg, a prominent cancer researcher, member of the working, humble and is known for his fluency in eight languages, in- National Academy of Sciences and a key voice in denying that HIV cluding all six of the local hill tribe dialects. During my month with causes AIDS. I also read claims from groups like RethinkingAIDS, Dr. Mark and his organization, I helped build toilets, collect water an international group of over 2,500 scientists, doctors and journal- supplies and run medical clinics. ists “reevaluating the HIV/AIDS hypothesis.”4-6 In fact, AIDS de- Through this experience and my discussions about HIV/AIDS nialists (including Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nudging Towards Vaccination: a Behavioral Law and Economics Approach to Childhood Immunization Policy*
    LASKOWSKI.TOPRINTER (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/2016 6:52 PM Nudging Towards Vaccination: A Behavioral Law and Economics Approach * to Childhood Immunization Policy I. Introduction The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation declared this decade “the Decade of Vaccines.”1 Vaccines are more effective and protect against more diseases than ever before;2 yet childhood immunization rates in the United States and many other industrialized nations are declining.3 Diseases that had been declared eradicated in the United States are increasingly reappearing.4 Most recently in early 2015, a large multistate measles outbreak was linked to an infected individual who had visited Disneyland in Southern California. A study concluded that the outbreak was likely a result of substandard vaccination rates.5 The anti-vaccination movement can be traced to a paper published by British doctor Andrew Wakefield in 1998 that claimed there might be a connection between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and * I would like to thank Professor Sean H. Williams for his guidance and assistance with early drafts of this Note. I would also like to thank the Texas Law Review staff for all the hard work put into the editing process. Finally, thank you to my parents for their love and support over the years. 1. Vaccine Delivery: Strategy Overview, BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUND., http://www .gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/Global-Development/Vaccine-Delivery [http://perma.cc/XQY4-F9GC]. 2. Ensuring Vaccine Safety, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, http://www .cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/index.html [http://perma.cc/QWP8-3G3V]; see Vaccine History: Developments by Year, CHILD.
    [Show full text]