DOCSLIB.ORG

10S I Alamos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10S I Alamos LA-7082-PR Progress Report UC-20 C.4 Issued: March 1978 I LASL Controlled Thermonuclear Research Program I January – Decem ber 1976 Compiled by Keith S. Thomas I I : 1 ( ) 10s alamos { ). scientific laboratory of the University of California LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO 87545 An AffirmativeAction/EqualOpportunityEmployer UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CONTRACT W-740 S-ENG. S6 The four most recent reports in this series, unclassified, are LA-5250-PR, LA-5656-P~ LA-6044-P~ and LA-6582-PR Work supported by US Energy Research and Development Administration, Division of Magnetic Fusion. ?tmtmim W tlnttcdS!.!IC<ofAmcnca.Awdil,hlc!“mm N.tiumdTcchnk.1I“f”rmatttinSCWICC U.S 12qwtmcnta,tCwmmcr.e S285P,,,tK,,ydR,,.d Spnn#ic.ld.VA 11161 Mkrdidlc s 3.011 126.15(17,25 2st.17s 10.7s 376400 I3S1O SOI-525 15.2s (101.(12s 4 ml 1s1.17s 8.00 276-3(IO 11.00 401425 I3.2s 526-55(I 15.s0 1116.0S0 a so 176.20(19.0[1 301.325 !1.75 426.4S0 14(Y2 551.575 16.25 [151.(175 5.25 201.22s 9.2s 326.350 12.(10 4s1.47s 14sl 576600 !6.S0 076.100 6.00 226.2S0 9.s0 3s1-315 [2.s0 476.S0[115,0(1 6CIl+Jp --1 101.125 6.S0 1.Add S2.S0forewh addtttonal10&Pagcmcremcntfrom601paw UP. Thts r.”orL w., p,ep. red .s ●n .cc’,u.1 U( W,,rk so,,nsw.d b. tfw Untt.d S1.tcs G.vrrmnent. Nrtther the Umtcd Stiles nor the Un, ted St.t.s rko.r’m. n, of Fnerw, “or .ny of Ih,u, .rnplcn,qWI ..Y nf them contr.ctws. subco”tr.. tor% or their vmPloYe.s. m.km .m w.m.nt., express or mmh.d. or .-..,.s .nY I.M[ lIabti:IY or resPon$1611ttYf-r the . ...Y. .,,rnplelcncs. m ..ef.lness of .ny lnf,, rm41i,, n, .pp.r.l us. pr,,duct, w process dwh,s++. or r.w.w.t. th.t ,1s.s. -,s,,1,! not mfcmm iw%..tc!y own-dnnhts. ABSTRACT This report presents the status of the Controlled Thermonuclear Research Program at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory for calendar year 1976. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 II. SCYLLAC FEEDBACK SECTOR EXPERIMENTS ................................................... 3 A. Introduction and Summary .......................................................... 3 B. Review of Scyllac Theory .......................................................... 5 c. Experimental Arrangement .......................................................... 7 D. Results with Feedback Stabilization in a Uniform Toroidal Discharge Tube .......... 11 E. Results with a Helical Discharge Tube ............................................. 15 F. Excluded Flux Measurements ........................................................ 19 G. Propagation ofm=l Waves ........................................................ 20 H. Diffusion ......................................................................... 23 I. Scyllac Magnetohydrodynamics ...................................................... 27 J. Scyllac Feedback System Development ............................................... 32 K. Preparations for ?.=1,2 Equilibrium Experiments .................................. 34 L. Similarity Between Wall Stabilization and E = 2 Feedback .......................... 38 References ............................................................................ 39 III. STAGED THETA-PINCH PROGRAM ............................................................ 41 A. Introduction ........................,............................................. 41 B. Staged Theta Pinch ............,..,................................................ 41 c. Resonant Heating Experiment ....................................................... 46 D. Summary ....................,...................................................... 49 References ............................................................................ 49 Iv. TOROIDAL REVERSED-FIELD PINCH ......................................................... 50 A. Summary ...........,............................................................... 50 B. Comparison of ZT-1 and ZT-S Stability Results ..................................... 50 c. Field Diffusion and Ideal MHD Stability ........................................... 53 D. Resistive MHD Stability ........................................................... 57 E. Temperature and Density Measurements on ZT-S ...................................... 58 F. Plasma Impurities ................................................................. 60 —. L*-= . —- -- G. Energy Balance Measurements on ZT-S ............................................... 64 p-” H. ZT-40 Toroidal, Reversed-Field Z-Pinch ............................................ 64 i- References ............................................................................ 66 SCYLLtiIV-P -iINti’THE+A-PINCtlEXPERIMENTS ............................................ 67 F=,“ A. Introduction ...................................................................... 67 i=- t B. Experimental Arrangement .......................................................... 67 k c. Experimental Results Without End Plugs .,.......................................... 69 ~~ ~ D. Plasma End Loss St:d;e_s............................................................ 76 — l+—-- - ... - —. - -+ K’ E. Initial Experimental Results with Solid End Plugs ................................. P3 References ................ ,. ., . 86 iii — VI. GUN INJECTION EXPERIMENT ............................................................. 88 A. Introduction ..................................................................... 68 B. Experimental Results ............................................................. B9 c. Summary and Plans for Further Investigation ...................................... 92 References ........................................................................... 93 VII. SCYLI.AI-C, LASER-PLASMA INTERACTION STUDIES ......................................... 94 A. Introduction ..................................................................... 94 B. Interferometry ................................................................... 94 c. Plasma Spectroscopy .............................................................. 96 D. Calorimetry ...................................................................... 97 E. Backacatter Spectroscopy ......................................................... 9B F. Summary .......................................................................... 99 References ........................................................................... 99 VIII. FIELD REVERSAL THETA PINCH ........................................................... 100 A. Introduction ..................................................................... 100 B. Description ...................................................................... 101 c. Engineering ...................................................................... 102 D. Diagnostics ...................................................................... 103 E. Experimental Program and Plasma Results .......................................... 104 F. Conclusion ....................................................................... 104 References ........................................................................... 104 IX. IMPLOSION HEATING EXPERTMSNT (IHX) ................................................... 106 A. Introduction and Summary ......................................................... 106 B. Experimental Results ............................................................. 106 c. Diagnostic Improvements ......................................................,... 107 References ........................................................................... 109 x. EXPERIMENTAL PLASMA PHYSICS .......................................................... 110 A. Summary ...............................................................,.......... 110 B. Electromagnetic Wave Absorption, Plasma Heating and Energy Transport in the Q-Machine .................................................. 110 c. Progress on an Experiment for Studying Nonlinear Interactions Between Plasma and Travelling Electromagnetic Waves ................................. 124 D. Q-Machine Hot Plate Development .................................................. 125 References ...........................................................-...s........... 125 XI. PLASMA DIAGNOSTICS ................................................................... 127 A. Introduction ..................................................................... 127 B. Spatially Resolved Thomson Scattering ............................................ 127 c. Heterodyne T.nterferometry........................................................ 133 D. On-Line Beta Measurement for Scylla IV-P ......................................... 137 E. Miscellaneous .................................................................... 139 References ............................................................,...,.......... 140 iv — XII. HIGH-BETA TOKAMAX ................................................................... 141 A. Introduction .................................................................... 141 B. High-Beta Tokamak Physics ....................................................... 141 c. Construction of the Proposed Machine ............................................ 141 D. Comparison with Other Experiments ............................................... 142 E. Problems at Long Confinement .................................................... 143 XIII. THEORY .............................................................................. 144 A. Introduction ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LASERLAB-EUROPE the Integrated Initiative of European Laser Research Infrastructures III
    LASERLAB-EUROPE The Integrated Initiative of European Laser Research Infrastructures III Grant Agreement number: 284464 Work package 3 – Publicity and Dissemination Deliverable D3.2 Laserlab Newsletter issue 2 Lead Beneficiary: 14 FVB-MBI Due date: Month 24 Date of delivery: Month 21 Project webpage: www.laserlab-europe.eu Deliverable Nature R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other O Dissemination Level PU = Public PU PP = Restricted to other programme participants (incl. the Commission Services) RE = Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (incl. the Commission Services) CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (incl. the Commission Services) Deliverable D3.2 LASERLAB-EUROPE (284464) Laserlab-Europe Newsletter The present document combines the second and third issue of the Laserlab Newsletter that were published since the start of the project. Instead of publishing only one issue per year electronically and in print as foreseen according to the grant agreement, Laserlab-Europe publishes the newsletter on a biannual basis. This highly appreciated newsletter has been started in FP6 with consecutive numbering, so that the issue numbers in this document are nos. 15 and 16. Issue 15 of the Laserlab-Europe newsletter: June 2013 (M13); Focus: Access success stories from different scientific fields, giving examples for potential users Issue 16 of the Laserlab-Europe newsletter: December 2013 (M19); Focus: Laserlab-Europe and industry relations All issues of the newsletter “Laserlab Forum” may be found at:
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Thermonuclear Research in the United Kingdom
    P/78 UK Controlled Thermonuclear Research in the United Kingdom By P. C. Thonemann* HISTORICAL magnetic fields was started by Sir George Thomson in London in 1947 and by myself in Oxford in 1948. The possibility of utilising the energy released in These independent programmes attracted Government nuclear reactions between the light elements was support in 1948 and continued in the two Universities probably first discussed at the Cavendish Laboratory, until 1951. Cambridge, in 1932. It was at this time that Lord Rutherford and his colleagues demonstrated that Several possible magnetic field configurations were artificial nuclear reactions could be produced in the studied in relation to toroidal tubes but confinement laboratory and that energy was released in each by the self-magnetic field of a current flowing in a gas appeared the most promising. Some of the results nuclear event. These reactions were produced by 2 4 accelerating positive ions or nuclei to high velocities, of this early work were published in 1951. " Figures using potential differences of hundreds of kilovolts, 1 and 2 show the type of apparatus employed at that and firing them at a target containing the other ele- time. In 1951 the London group moved to the ments. At low bombarding energies these reactions Research Laboratory of Associated Electrical Indus- were found to be most probable with the light ele- tries, Aldermaston, and the Oxford group to Harwell. ments. A small team at the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment began in 1956 to pay special attention No direct application of their discoveries for power to the interesting features of the dynamic pinch.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Pulsed Power
    SAND2007-2984P PULSED POWER AT SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES LABORATORIES NATIONAL SANDIA PULSED POWER AT WHAT IS PULSED POWER . the first forty years In the early days, this technology was often called ‘pulse power’ instead of pulsed power. In a pulsed power machine, low-power electrical energy from a wall plug is stored in a bank of capacitors and leaves them as a compressed pulse of power. The duration of the pulse is increasingly shortened until it is only billionths of a second long. With each shortening of the pulse, the power increases. The final result is a very short pulse with enormous power, whose energy can be released in several ways. The original intent of this technology was to use the pulse to simulate the bursts of radiation from exploding nuclear weapons. Anne Van Arsdall Anne Van Pulsed Power Timeline (over) Anne Van Arsdall SAND2007-????? ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Jeff Quintenz initiated this history project while serving as director of the Pulsed Power Sciences Center. Keith Matzen, who took over the Center in 2005, continued funding and support for the project. The author is grateful to the following people for their assistance with this history: Staff in the Sandia History Project and Records Management Department, in particular Myra O’Canna, Rebecca Ullrich, and Laura Martinez. Also Ramona Abeyta, Shirley Aleman, Anna Nusbaum, Michael Ann Sullivan, and Peggy Warner. For her careful review of technical content and helpful suggestions: Mary Ann Sweeney. For their insightful reviews and comments: Everet Beckner, Don Cook, Mike Cuneo, Tom Martin, Al Narath, Ken Prestwich, Jeff Quintenz, Marshall Sluyter, Ian Smith, Pace VanDevender, and Gerry Yonas.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA1.94Og27.Ool G
    DNA1.94Og27.Ool g No. Pub. Year Citations File Name File Size (bytes) 5 1967-1968 857 RADBIB05.TXT 791,604 The search criteria was for radiation or radiological for publication year greater than 1966 and less than 1969. The document database four character field names and a descriptor for each. field are as follows: ABS Abstract ACCD Accession Date ADNO DTIC Number ---*->*h I AUTH Author (s) CCDE Computer Code ( s ) CLSS Classification CONN Contract Number CORP Corporation DATE Report Date DESC Descriptor (s) EFFT Damage Mechanism EMPF Electro Magnetic Pulse File number(s) HESO High Explosive Shot(s) INUM Item Number LA Country or Language PROJ Project Number REPN Report Number SHOT Nuclear Test (s) SUCE Device Designation SUJO DASIAC Subject number(s) SYMJ Published in SYST System Affected TEMP Document Control number(s) TITL Report Title TNFF Tactical Nuclear Warfare TREE Transient Radiation Effects on Electronics number(s) TSHO Shot. Type Statement A Approved for public release;* Distribution unlirnited.ZMi-d=- .folddata Report Log for Bibliography Report 'bibliography' scheduled as 'radbib' Bibliography using full text searching with selection qualification. STILAS text selection v6.2 started on Monday, June 13, 1994, 10:45 AM Search will use the KUNI database Search strings will be read from standard input The catalog key will be written to standard output 19940613104505 BRS/Search-Engine v.5 started for seltextl 11379 records found for #1: RADIATION OR RADIOLOGICAL 1 searches considered 1 searches selected. STILAS text selection finished on Monday, June 13, 1994, 10:49 AM STILAS catalog selection v6.2 started on Monday, June 13, 1994, 10:45 Ah4 Catalog key will be read from standard input The catalog key will be written to standard output The author key will be written to standard output The title key will be written to standard output Catalog will be selected if year-ofjub is more than 1968 and less than 1971 11379 catalog record(s) considered 893 catalog record(s) selected.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Nuclear Fusion
    TOWARDS NUCLEAR FUSION The outlook for controlled nuclear fusion has many people had apparently been led to believe. become much more complex than it appeared to be - Professor Teller said that while he believed that at least to the general public - when the possibility of thermonuclear energy generation was possible, it was taming thermonuclear reactions for the production of not going to be "quite easy". Professor L.A.Artsim- useful power was optimistically mentioned at the 1955 ovich of the Soviet Union remarked: "We do not Geneva conference on the peaceful uses of atomic wish to be pessimistic in appraising the future of our energy. Indeed, it may now be impossible to re­ work, yet we must not underestimate the difficulties capture the widespread excitement that followed the which will have to be overcome before we learn to prediction about thermonuclear power by the Presi­ master thermonuclear fusion. " Dr. P. C. Thonemann dent of the conference. Dr. Homi J. Bhabha of India, of the United Kingdom thought that an answer to the and the subsequent disclosures that research on con­ question whether electrical power could be generated trolled nuclear fusion was actively under way in some "using the light elements as fuel by themselves" could of the technically advanced countries. be given only in the next decade, and if the answer was "yes" a further ten years would be required to The significance of this possibility was immedi­ answer the question whether such a power source was ately recognized and there were many enthusiastic economically valuable. accounts of what the generation of power from fusion reactions would mean to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pinch Effect Revisited
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 18, Number 6, February 8, 1991 The pinch effect revisited The late WinstonH. Bostick's 1977 groundbreaking examination qfthis aspect qfcontrolled thermonuclearfusion. Part 1 qf a series. We present here an historic scientificessay by Prof. Winston plasma pinch have been found to be essential in understand­ H. Bostick on the development of the plasma pinch from ing the tokamak itself. Furthermore, this deeper scientific its inception in early fusion energy research experiments comprehension has opened up prospects for realizing even through to 1977, which was first published in the Fusion more advanced typesof fusion reactors. But neither the toka­ Energy Foundation's International Journal of Fusion Ener­ mak nor these more advanced possibilities are being pursued gy, Vol. 1, No. 1, March 1977. Given his own role in the today, given the budget cuts now being implemented. development of this approach to magnetic fusion, the essay is necessarily semi-autobiographical. The pinch effect is the self-constriction of a column of de­ The following information will help the reader to put the formable conductor which is carrying an electric current.The essay in the context of developments since 1977. constricting effect on the column is produced by the magnetic In 1977, the United States had the world's largest and field pressure resulting from this current, or equivalently, by most advanced fusion energy research program. But during the Lorentz force produced by the currentflowing in its own the Carter administration, the program was essentially put magnetic field. Thus, in a controlled thermonuclear fusion on hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokamaks and Pinches (History, Tokamak Taxonomy)
    Tokamaks and pinches (history, tokamak taxonomy) Gergő Pokol BME NTI Fusion devices 9. March 2020 Gergő Pokol: Tokamaks and pinches 1. Take your mobile phone or laptop 2. WiFi password: wigner2/wigner2008 – or mobilnet 3. Browser: Kahoot.it 4. Code on screen 5. Name: Neptun code !!! 6. Evaluation: – Good answer +1 score – Winner of Kahoot +1 score At the end of semester: normalize with number of questions to get %. 2 Fusion devices, 9. March 2020 Gergő Pokol: Tokamaks and pinches Provisional program Date Lecturer Topic 10. FebruaryPokol Theory review (fuel flow, magnetic confinement, transport, tokamak, stellarator) Technology review (vacuum, magnetic field, plasma heating, current drive, plasma 17. FebruaryPokol diagnostics) 24. FebruaryVeres Stellarators (history, Wendelstein line, stellarator taxonomy) 2. MarchPokol Wendelstein 7-X stellarator 9. MarchPokol Tokamaks and piches (history, tokamak taxonomy) 16. MarchPokol JET (goals, structure, status) 23. MarchPokol ITER (goals, structure, status) 30. MarchPokol DEMO, Fusion Roadmap 6. AprilPokol Mid-term exam 20. AprilPokol Middle-sized tokamak program 27. AprilPokol Spheromaks, spherical tokamaks, US fusion program 4. MayPokol Far East superconducting tokamaks 11. MayPokol Tokamak simulation exercise 18. MayPokol Final exam 3 Fusion devices, 9. March 2020 Gergő Pokol: Tokamaks and pinches Pinch effect Pinch effect discovered in 1904 in liquid metals: Radial compressing force in a conductor caused by current. The magnetic field strength: The force balance : Sausage instability Kink instability 4 Fusion devices, 9. March 2020 Gergő Pokol: Tokamaks and pinches Pinch devices - types Toroidal Z-pinch: high current, high pressure plasma stabilized by a toroidal magnetic field. q-pinch: stable configuration, but problems with ends. Racetrack configuration unstable.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for FRX-C and Multiple-Cell Compact Torus Experiments
    LA-8045-P Proposal Proposal for FRX-C and Multiple-Cell Compact Torus Experiments (0 i i "> "'"'' "c 15 O *^ o 'E LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY Post Office Box 1663 Los Alamos. New Mexico 87545 LA-8045-P Proposal UC-20f Issued: October 1979 Proposal for FRX-C and Multiple-Cell Compact Torus Experiments submitted to Office of Fusion Energy Department of Energy Washington, DC 20545 by H. Dreicer for Staff of the Controlled Thermonuclear Division Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 in rcsp 'fi'bilitv lui tin- ittxuiticy, pwdjLl. Jf U'UCP^ diuloscd, nr i United Sidio^ Gnvo'nrrn^nt 01 jny iKit-r*cv lheiiKil, UNO. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vi ABSTRACT 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 (3.110) SCIENTIFIC SCOPE 5 Introduction 5 Overview of CT Research 6 LASL CT Program 3 Status of Field-Reversed Theta-Pinch Physics . 10 The FRX-C Scaling Experiment 15 The Scylla IV-P Multiple-Cell Experiment 19 Future Plans 22 (3.120) ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION 24 The FRX-C Experiment 24 The Scylla IV-P Multiple-Cell Experiment 27 Plasma Diagnostics 32 (3.130) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST 35 (3-140) MILESTONES 37 (3.150) MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS 38 References . 39 Appendix A—LASL Compact Torus Progam Plan 41 Appendix B—Review of Previous Experiments 69 Appendix C—Status of Field-Reversed Theta-Pinch Theory. ... 35 Appendix D—Field-Reversed Theta-Pinch Scaling 92 Appendix E—Recent FRX-A and FRX-B Results 103 PREFACE Compilation of this document is primarily the effort of R. E. Siemon with help from H.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Labs Accomplishments
    LABS ACCOMPLISHMENTS Exceptional service in the SANDIA LABNEWS national interest March 2019 CONTENTS 3 8 9 A letter from the Laboratories director Welcome to the 2019 edition of the annual Lab News Labs NUCLEAR ADVANCED SCIENCE Accomplishments. Here you’ll GLOBAL SECURITY find a snapshot of significant DETERRENCE & TECHNOLOGY work performed this past year by the remarkable staff at Sandia National Laboratories. 10 13 14 Every Sandian plays a role in these accomplish- ments. Behind each project is a team of dedicated, hard-working people helping to solve the nation’s toughest national security challenges. From critical milestones in our key mission areas to scientific breakthroughs reached via Laboratory Directed Research and ENERGY & HOMELAND NATIONAL SECURITY HUMAN RESOURCES Development to valuable advances in mission SECURITY PROGRAMS & COMMUNICATIONS support, Sandians consistently provide “exceptional service in the national interest.” Our work is needed now more than ever. 15 16 17 Sandia’s national security missions, including maintaining the safety, reliability and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear deterrent, are becoming more critical as the world faces an array of threats that widens every day. The scope of our capabilities makes us invalu- able. Sandia’s deep science and engineering MISSION INFRASTRUCTURE foundations provide a cross-disciplinary advan- MISSION SERVICES ASSURANCE OPERATIONS tage that helps us tackle and solve the biggest problems and makes the world a safer place. There is much here to be proud of, but it’s 18 19 19 impossible to collect every accomplishment. Many of our greatest achievements have come in areas of national security that are too sensitive for general publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 13Th Space Simulation Conference
    NASA Conference Publication 2340 13th Space Simulation Conference The Payload- Testing for Success H Proceedings of a symposium held at Sheraton Twin Towers, Orlando, Florida October 8-11, 1984 H r _ '_:_!i_!:_ii__ =,, = _. U L: ¸ NASA Conference Publication 2340 13th Space Simulation Conference The Payload- Testing for Success Sponsored by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Institute of Environmental Sciences The American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics The American Society for Testing and Materials Proceedings of a symposium held at Sheraton Twin Towers, Orlando, Florida October 8-11, 1984 IW_,A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1984 P REFAC E The Thirteenth Space Simulation Conference, held at the Sheraton Twin Towers, Orlando, Florida, October 8-11, 1984 was sponsored by the Institute of Environmental Sciences and supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and the American Society for Testing and Materials. These conferences have brought together engineers and scientists of diverse disciplines with the common interests of space simulation, its applications and solutions of complex problems that are encountered. This conference was favored with a wide variety of papers concerning facilities, testing and contamination control. Our featured speaker was Francis J. Logan, Deputy Project Manager, Solar Maximum Repair Mission, who spoke of the problems and successes of retrieving and repairing an orbiting spacecraft utilizing the Shuttle. This endeavor was a historic first for the space program. The meeting was concluded with a trip to the Kennedy Space Center to see the Shuttle complex and other points of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of FUSION ENERGY
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of FUSION ENERGY March 1977 Vol. I, No. 1 The Pinch Effect Revisited by Winston H. Bostick FOUNDED BY THE FUSION ENERGY FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of FUSION ENERGY founded by the Fusion Energy Foundation Vol. I, No. 1 March 1977 EDITORIAL STAFF MANAGING EDITORS Dr. Steven Bardwell Inaugural Note Dr. Morris Levitt The Pinch Effect Revisited ASSISTANT EDITOR Dr. Winston H. Bostick Marjorie Hecht PRODUCTION EDITORS Nancy Arnest Laurie Teitelbaum INITIATING EDITORIAL 1954-63 Practical Schemes BOARD 1964-74 Omnis Plasma Est... Dr. Winston Bostick Space-Time Resolution Professor of Physics The Unfinished Saga of the Pinch Effect Stevens Institute of Technology Postscript from the IAEA Conference on Con­ trolled Nuclear Fusion and Plasma Dr. Robert Moon Physics, October 1976 Professor-at-large References University of Chicago List of Abbreviations Dr. Lloyd Motz About the Author Professor of Astronomy Columbia University Dr. Daniel Wells Professor of Physics University of Miami, Florida The IJFE is published quarterly by the Fusion Energy Foundation. Editorial, subscription, and advertising offices are at 231 West 29 Street, New York N.Y. 10001. IJFE subscriptions are $35 per year; $40 outside the U.S. and Canada. All material published in the IJFE is Copyright ©1977 by the Fusion Energy Foundation, and all rights are reserved. Address inquiries to Managing Editor, Box 1943, GPO, New York, N.Y. 10001. Inaugural Note The International Journal of Fusion Energy begins publication under the initial aegis of the Fusion Energy Foundation in what the editors hope will become a worthy new source for the progress of plasma physics (as part of the self-ordering behavior of most aspects of the universe!) The Journal, like its plasma subject matter, started out and continues in a state of healthy flux, with the scientific editorial board still in formation and the permanent publishing arrangements of the quarterly still to be finalized.
    [Show full text]
  • Cern Libraries, Geneva Cm-P00094894 Organisation
    CERN LIBRARIES, GENEVA CERN/88 31 CM-P00094894 ORGANISATION EUROPÉENNE POUR LA RECHERCHE NUCLÉAIRE CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH SCIENTIFIC POLICY COMMITTEE Twelfth Meeting Geneva - 17 April, 1959 DRAFT REPORT OF THE CERN STUDY GROUP ON FUSION PROBLEMS At its Tenth Session, the Council of CERN decided to set up a study group to initiate a study to evaluate the plasma physics research programmes aimed at fusion, which are at present being conducted or planned in European and other countries, and to report to the Council. Attached, you will find the second draft of the report to the Council. This is not yet the final version but it will probably not be changed much before issue to the Council. The members of the Scientific Policy Committee are invited to express their views on the conclusion of the CERN study group on fusion problems. 6486 CERN/FSG/7 2nd DRAFT 24th March, 1959. EUROPEAN FUSION RESEARCH Report of the CERN Study Group on FUSION PROBLEMS CERN/FSG/7 - 2nd DRAFT INDEX Part I - General. 1. Reasons for setting up the CERN Study Group on fusion problems. 2. Objectives of the Study Group. 3. Participants of the Study Group. 4. Brief Review of the activities of the Study Group. Part II - Review of the activities of European laboratories working on fusion problems. Part III- Discussions of the Study Group. 1. On the nature of the fusion problems in the next few years. 2. On the magnitude of the effort on fusion problems in Europe. 3. On the problem of education and training of staff and the exchange of staff between laboratories.
    [Show full text]