British Strategy in the War of 1812— the Balance of Power in Europe and the Perils of a Peripheral War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Strategy in the War of 1812— the Balance of Power in Europe and the Perils of a Peripheral War British Strategy in the War of 1812— the Balance of Power in Europe and the Perils of a Peripheral War by Andrew Lambert, PhD in Spain and France paled into insignifi- cance alongside the massive allied armies he War of 1812 was a curi- tion, and the titanic battle of Leipzig only Napoleon abdicated in April 1814—which gathering on the Rhine for the invasion of ous conflict with at least emphasized that the American war was a is why the Anglo-American peace was France. The central European perspectives three different interpreta- trifling, tedious distraction. The big event signed in Ghent. of Austrian Chancellor Metternich, Czar tions of the outcome: the old of the year for British strategy was the col- In 1813, British strategists had few Alexander I, and the Prussians, along with American claim that it was lapse of Napoleonic Spain. The battle of options. They had to keep up the naval the parochial concerns of Swedish Crown a victorious “Second War of Vitoria enhanced British diplomatic lever- blockade on the far side of the Atlantic Prince Bernadotte, led them to view Iberia TIndependence,” Canadian Prime Minister age with other European powers, and ended to deny American cruisers and privateers as a mere sideshow and the American war Stephen Harper’s Canadian triumph, and the need for American grain and flour. access to the sea, while an economic war as a distraction and a weakness they could British amnesia—for them 1812 was all The British government largely ignored wreaked havoc on the American treasury, exploit to limit British influence. about Napoleon marching on Moscow. the American war because the convoy but limited military manpower meant Lord Castlereagh’s diplomacy was By any calculation, Great Britain was very system succeeded in reducing commercial that anything beyond holding the Cana- dominated by Britain’s refusal to compro- busy in 1812, which was why President risk and loss to manageable levels, while dian frontier, the dominant military effort, mise on the issue of maritime belligerent Madison decided on war. The Royal Navy intelligence sharing between Lloyds and and Cockburn’s brilliant, extemporized, rights, the very core of the Anglo-American was running a truly global war to maintain the Admiralty ensured there were no un- small-scale high-tempo raiding on the struggle. He recognized that Russia was control of the seas, while the British army pleasant surprises. Rear Admiral George Chesapeake was simply impossible. At the anxious to re-open the subject—and not was committed to the liberation of Spain, Cockburn’s 1813 Chesapeake raids began same time, a rising tide of insurrection to Britain’s advantage—when a post-war the security of Britain and Sicily, and the the process of taking the initiative on the across the Spanish Caribbean and Latin European Congress assembled to redraw construction of an Indian Empire. Most littoral, and closing the American cruiser America was challenging the security of the maps and charters of the world. of the British troops in the Americas were ports. Although they paid the war little the British sugar islands. As a result, too Anticipating a future clash with Britain, tied up in the West Indies. British strat- attention, British ministers were always many troops were tied down in West Indies Russia wanted to push the American/ egy was global, over-stretched and under- looking to conclude this annoying side garrisons, ostensibly against the improb- French claim that neutral ships made the resourced. Consequently, the new conflict show. By late 1813, they accepted that the able risk of an American attack, but in fact cargoes neutral—thereby disarming sea with the Americans was most unwelcome, limited war strategy of isolating and target- to calm the nerves of politically powerful power. This had been the purpose of the and the government in London would have ing the Southern and mid-Atlantic states planters who feared a slave uprising. Russian offer to broker peace in 1813. been content to accept a status quo ante by economic blockade and coastal raids The political weight of the West Indies Castlereagh made the British position peace at any time before the abdication had not broken the Union. Consequently, remained strong: the Ministry depended very clear and did not hesitate to issue a of Napoleon in April 1814. They simply they stepped up pressure on Washington on the planters’ votes and their profits, scarcely veiled threat. “Great Britain may wanted the war to go away, so they could by translating the vital naval blockade of remitted in specie, to retain political power be driven out of a Congress but not out of address the main problem, the peace and New England into an economic offensive, and fund the European war. British stra- her maritime rights, and if the continental london gallery, portrait national stability of Europe. and increased the scale and tempo of coastal tegy would be bound by such calculations Powers know their own interests they Robert Stewart, Viscount Castlereagh was the British foreign secretary charged with broker- In 1812 the British Government took raids. Even so, British options were limited. until Napoleon had been defeated. Strategy will not hazard this.” He also crushed ing peace negotiations between Great Britain and the United States at the close of the War several months to accept that the Americans As long as Napoleon remained in power, to fight America was bound by chains of Napoleon’s malicious suggestion that of 1812, while simultaneously serving as Britain’s chief diplomat in the Congress of Vienna, were serious, delaying vital strategic meas- few British soldiers could be spared for sugar and gold to the defense of West the Americans should be invited to any which redrew the political map of Europe in 1815 at the close of the Napoleonic Wars. ures, including the economic blockade. America, while fresh theaters were opening Indian commercial and territorial power. congress. In September 1813, Castlereagh Furthermore, every subsequent shift in in Northern Europe. West Indian complaints prompted Mel- restated the British position. There would French, American, or Russian attempts The Americans conceded Britain’s British policy would be driven by the same As Napoleon retreated westward, the ville to remove Admiral John Warren from be no congress until maritime rights had to alter the rules of war at sea. core war aims—maritime belligerent overriding European imperative. From early British saw an opportunity to destroy his his command of the West Indies and North been taken off the agenda, and he would Having secured their freedom to deal rights and impressment—at the start of 1813, the cabinet effectively ignored the naval arsenal and fleet at Antwerp. This American Stations and replace him with not allow the American war to be dis- with the United States and maritime negotiations: having failed to conquer war, leaving a profoundly unenthusiastic was the overriding British strategic inter- Vice Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane, cussed at a general European settlement. questions without European interfer- Canada, they had nothing to trade. The First Lord of the Admiralty, Lord Melville, est; in comparison, reinforcing Canada Governor of Guadeloupe. Great Britain In December 1813, the cabinet instructed ence, the British could wait for Madison only question for the British was how far the to direct a minor naval war, along with or attacking America was insignificant. would not risk the sugar islands for some Castlereagh that if the European pow- to recognize the inevitable. American blockade and coastal operations could be Earl Bathurst, Secretary of State for War Antwerp, the casus belli in 1793, had be- fleeting advantage on the American main- ers raised the subject he could state that obduracy meant negotiations would be- translated into more positive outcomes. The and the Colonies, another minister with come a major French naval base, the fixed land. In consequence, the scale of coastal Britain was prepared to make peace with gin only after Napoleon had abdicated. cabinet showed little interest in anything more pressing duties, in his case support- point around which the British developed operations would be severely limited until the United States on the principles of the From an American perspective, it seemed beyond that. Castlereagh’s aim had been to ing the war in Spain. The loss of three their war aims and strategy. Yet, with the Europe was at peace. status quo ante bellum. These terms had obvious that once Great Britain escaped keep the American and European conflicts frigate actions in the autumn of 1812 main army in Spain, the Cabinet could Over the autumn and winter of 1813, been available, in fact, from the first day the overriding demands of the European in separate, hermetically sealed boxes. He caused a minor sensation, before the bril- only find a paltry 11,000 men—the opera- Foreign Secretary Lord Castlereagh spent of the war—the Americans would sign war, a bankrupt and beaten United States had no intention of allowing any Euro- liant Shannon-Chesapeake action restored tion failed. If Britain lacked the military every waking moment trying to keep the them on 24 December 1814. To this end, could not hope to secure improved terms. pean power to take a role in the process. British preeminence at sea. Instead, British force to secure existential war aims in nearby latest European coalition pulling together, Castlereagh carefully courted Austria as Having agreed to talks, the British Vice By contrast, Britain had little ability concerns in 1813 were dominated by the Belgium, there was no prospect that men using a combination of British economic a counterweight to Russia, making con- Consul forwarded the American mail to influence the negotiations at Ghent by crisis and collapse of Napoleon’s German could be found to pursue altogether less aid, military hardware, and diplomatic cessions to Vienna on Central European bag to London, to be opened and deci- military force.
Recommended publications
  • North Country Notes
    Clinton County Historical Association North Country Notes Issue #414 Fall, 2014 Henry Atkinson: When the Lion Crouched and the Eagle Soared by Clyde Rabideau, Sn I, like most people in this area, had not heard of ing the same year, they earned their third campaigu Henry Atkinson's role in the history of Plattsburgh. streamer at the Battle of Lundy Lane near Niagara It turns out that he was very well known for serving Falls, when they inflicted heavy casualties against the his country in the Plattsburgh area. British. Atkinson was serving as Adjutant-General under Ma- jor General Wade Hampton during the Battle of Cha- teauguay on October 25,1814. The battle was lost to the British and Wade ignored orders from General James Wilkinson to return to Cornwall. lnstead, he f retreated to Plattsburgh and resigned from the Army. a Colonel Henry Atkinson served as commander of the a thirty-seventh Regiment in Plattsburgh until March 1, :$,'; *'.t. 1815, when a downsizing of the Army took place in the aftermath of the War of 1812. The 6'h, 11'h, 25'h, Brigadier General Henry Atkinson 2'7th, zgth, and 37th regiments were consolidated into Im age courtesy of www.town-of-wheatland.com the 6th Regiment and Colonel Henry Atkinson was given command. The regiment was given the number While on a research trip, I was visiting Fort Atkin- sixbecause Colonel Atkinson was the sixth ranking son in Council Bluffs, Nebraska and picked up a Colonel in the Army at the time. pamphlet that was given to visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
    THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Pensioners of the War of 1812
    Commodore Macdonough Painted by Gilbert Stuart. Reproduced by permission of Messrs. Rodney and Augustus R. Macdonough. A List of Pensioners of the War of 1812 Edited by BYRON N. CLARK Librarian, Vermont Antiquarian Society. H With an Appendix containing names of Volunteers for the defence of Plattsburgh from Vermont towns, a description of the battle from con- temporaneous sources, the official statement of losses, and names of United States officers and soldiers at Burlington, Vermont, as shown on army pay and muster rolls recently brought to light. RESEARCH PUBLICATION COMPANy, Burlington and Boston, 1904, THE SHELDON PRESS, PRINTERS BURLINGTON, VT, • • » / pr PREFACE /6S HE Vermont Antiquarian Society has cour- teously permitted the publication of the inter- esting record kept by William G. Shaw of Burlington, Vt., during his activity as a pen- sion agent, so far as the notes relate to soldiers in the War of 1812. This record has particular value as it includes abstracts of the evidence presented by the claimant. There was no Ver- mont law requiring vital records to be kept by town clerks prior to 1840, hence attempts to learn the families of Vermont soldiers in either the Revolution or the War of 1812 frequently are futile. All who have had occasion to seek genealogical details in Vermont will realize the importance of this pension evidence. The Volunteers whose names are printed are from the towns of Burlington, Colchester, Huntington, Milton, Under- bill, Shelburne, Jericho, and Hinesburgh, and in all, number 189. The contemporaneous accounts of the battle were copied from the newspaper files in the Fletcher Free Library at Bur- lington.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Review and Archaeological Assessment of Selected Areas from the Revolutionary War and War of 1812
    American Battlefield Protection Program Grant 2287-16-009: Document Review and Archaeological Assessment Document Review and Archaeological Assessment of Selected Areas from the Revolutionary War and War of 1812. Plattsburgh, New York PREPARED FOR: The City of Plattsburgh, NY, 12901 IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF GRANT FUNDING PROVIDED THROUGH: American Battlefield Protection Program Heritage Preservation Services National Park Service 1849 C Street NW (NC330) Washington, DC 20240 (Grant 2287-16-009) PREPARED BY: 4472 Basin Harbor Road, Vergennes, VT 05491 802.475.2022 • [email protected] • www.lcmm.org BY: Cherilyn A. Gilligan Christopher R. Sabick Patricia N. Reid 2019 1 American Battlefield Protection Program Grant 2287-16-009: Document Review and Archaeological Assessment Abstract As part of a regional collaboration between the City of Plattsburgh, New York, and the towns of Plattsburgh and Peru, New York, the Maritime Research Institute (MRI) at the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum (LCMM) has been chosen to investigate six historical Revolutionary War and War of 1812 sites: Valcour Island, Crab Island, Fort Brown, Fort Moreau, Fort Scott, and Plattsburgh Bay. These sites will require varying degrees of evaluation based upon the scope of the overall heritage tourism plan for the greater Plattsburgh area. The MRI’s role in this collaboration is to conduct a document review for each of the six historic sites as well as an archaeological assessment for Fort Brown and Valcour Island. The archaeological assessments will utilize KOCOA analysis outlined in the Battlefield Survey Manual of the American Battlefield Protection Program provided by the National Park Service. This deliverable fulfills Tasks 1 and 3 of the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) Grant 2887-16-009.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Plattsburgh, September 11, 1814
    History of the War of 1812 – Battle of Plattsburgh, September 11, 1814 (Referenced to National Education Standards) Objectives: Students will be able to cite the basic facts relating to the land and water battles at Plattsburgh, New York on September 11, 1814 and be able to place the location and events into the chronological framework of the War of 1812. Time: 3 to 5 class periods, depending on extension activities. Skills: Reading, chronological thinking, map-making. Content Areas: Language Arts – Vocabulary, Language Arts- Reading, Social Studies – Geography, Social Studies - United States history. Materials: - Poster board - Colored markers/crayons - Pencils - Copies of reading materials Standards: NCHS History Standards K-4 Historical Thinking Standards 1A: Identify the temporal structure of an historical narrative or story. 1F: Create timelines. 5A: Identify problems and dilemmas confronting people in historical stories, myths, legends, and fables, and in the history of their school, community, state, nation, and the world. 5B: Analyze the interests, values, and points of view of those involved in the dilemma or problem situation . K-4 Historical Content Standards 4D: The student understands events that celebrate and exemplify fundamental values and principles of American democracy. 4E: The student understands national symbols through which American values and principles are expressed. 5-12 Historical Thinking Standards 1A: Identify the temporal structure of an historical narrative or story. 1B: Interpret data presented in time lines and create time lines. 5-12 History Content Standards Era 4: Expansion and Reform (1801-1861) 1A: The student understands the international background and consequences of the Louisiana Purchase, the War of 1812, and the Monroe Doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Plattsburg Flag 1814
    The Battle of Plattsburg Flag 1814 Veteran Exempts Flag The Veteran Exempts, commanded by a Captain Melvin L. Woolsey, was a local New York militia company, formed in July of 1812, which was made up of veterans of the American Revolution who were otherwise exempt from military service because of their age. Many of the settlers in upstate New York (and Ohio) were veterans of the Revolutionary War and had been paid by grants of lands on the frontiers. By forming militia units they enabled the younger militia men to go off to war while they stayed to protect the local settlements. Like the Home Guard in Britain during the Second World War, they did provide a valuable reserve in a time of crisis. This Veteran Exempts flag may have been used at the Battle of Plattsburgh in upper New York. The Battle, also known as the Battle of Lake Champlain, ended the final British invasion attempt of the northern United States during the War of 1812. Fought shortly before the signing of the Treaty of Ghent, the American victory denied the British leverage to demand exclusive control over the Great Lakes and any territorial gains against the New England states. Little other information is available on the activities of the Veterans Exempts during the War of 1812. The Veterans Exempt flag was described in the Plattsburgh Republican, July 31, 1812, as having "...a black ground with 13 stars for the Union of White, wrought in silver. That in the centre of the Flag there he a Death's Head, with cross bones under, intimating what must soon, according to the course of nature, be their promiscuous fate, and the immediate one of any enemy who shall venture to contend with them.
    [Show full text]
  • 401 Spring2008 I{Orth Countryr Notes
    Clinton County Historical Association lssue #401 Spring2008 I{orth Countryr Notes ,lulian O. Davidson, Marine Artist Joy A. Demarse, Ph. D On June 21, 1912, the Platts- paint the historic naval battle at be the best painting of this impor- burgh Sentinel reported that the Plattsburgh reflects not only an tant American naval bat- Honorable Smith M. Weed had acknowledgement of Davidson's tle" (Beman 45). invited "the Tercentenary Com- artistic skill but also Davidson's Was Julian Davidson's depic- mission and the rest of its distin- Plattsburgh connection: the artist tion of the naval battle at Platts- guished party" to his house on was a nephew of the Honorable burgh influenced by his visits to July 6 to view the Battle of Smith M. Weed. Davidson's his parents'family home? Did the Plattsburgh. The painting to mother, Harriet Standish David- reminiscences of his grandmother, which the Honorable Mr. Weed son, and Weeci's u'rfe, Caroline "Events of a Few Eventful Days in referred also rvas knou'n as the Standish \\ eed. were sisters. 1814" (Davidson 17-88) about the Battle o.f Lake Champlain and Julian Dar.idson's mother. Har- September 1 1 battle spark his cu- had been commrssioned by'Weed riet Standish Dar.rdson, was the riosity? Did the descriotions of in 188-l lrom American marine daughter of the Honorable Mat- Lake Champlain from his aunts' artist Julian Oliver Davidson. thew Miles Standish and Catherine writings spur his imagination? No It uould not have been un- Phebe Miiler Standish. Davidson's one knows.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section U
    U-2 (Reconnaissance aircraft) (Not Subd Geog) U.S. 30 U.S. Bicycle Route System (May Subd Geog) [TL686.L (Manufacture)] USE United States Highway 30 UF USBRS (U.S. Bicycle Route System) [UG1242.R4 (Military aeronautics)] U.S. 31 BT Bicycle trails—United States UF Lockheed U-2 (Airplane) USE United States Highway 31 U.S.-Canada Border Region BT Lockheed aircraft U.S. 40 USE Canadian-American Border Region Reconnaissance aircraft USE United States Highway 40 U.S. Capitol (Washington, D.C.) U-2 (Training plane) U.S. 41 USE United States Capitol (Washington, D.C.) USE Polikarpov U-2 (Training plane) USE United States Highway 41 U.S. Capitol Complex (Washington, D.C.) U-2 Incident, 1960 U.S. 44 USE United States Capitol Complex (Washington, BT Military intelligence USE United States Highway 44 D.C.) Military reconnaissance U.S. 50 U.S. Cleveland Post Office Building (Punta Gorda, Fla.) U-Bahn-Station Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) USE United States Highway 50 UF Cleveland Post Office Building (Punta Gorda, USE U-Bahnhof Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) U.S. 51 Fla.) U-Bahnhof Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) USE United States Highway 51 BT Post office buildings—Florida UF Kröpcke, U-Bahnhof (Hannover, Germany) U.S. 52 U.S. Coast Guard Light Station (Jupiter Inlet, Fla.) Station Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) USE United States Highway 52 USE Jupiter Inlet Light (Fla.) U-Bahn-Station Kröpcke (Hannover, Germany) U.S. 54 U.S. Consulate Terrorist Attack, Banghāzī, Libya, 2012 BT Subway stations—Germany USE United States Highway 54 USE Benghazi Consulate Attack, Banghāzī, Libya, U-Bahnhof Lohring (Bochum, Germany) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Cantonment Saranac: the Es Arch for Col
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 44 Special Issue: War of 1812 Article 9 2015 Finding Cantonment Saranac: The eS arch for Col. Zebulon Pike’s 1812-1813 Winter Cantonment in Plattsburgh, New York Timothy J. Abel Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Abel, Timothy J. (2015) "Finding Cantonment Saranac: The eS arch for Col. Zebulon Pike’s 1812-1813 Winter Cantonment in Plattsburgh, New York," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 44 44, Article 9. Available at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol44/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Northeast Historical Archaeology/Vol. 44, 2015 147 Finding Cantonment Saranac: The Search for Col. Zebulon Pike’s 1812-1813 Winter Cantonment in Plattsburgh, New York Timothy J. Abel From 2011 to 2013, archaeologists, students and volunteers conducted survey and excavation of the Zagreb site, near Plattsburgh, NY, in an effort to associate it with the enigmatic Cantonment Saranac— Col. Zebulon Pike’s winter cantonment of 1812–1813. Missing for over a century, local historians had tried unsuccessfully to establish its location based on archival descriptions. Until 2011, archaeological evidence from the site was entirely lacking. Using metal detection, the current project has successfully linked the historical to the actual, providing a unique glimpse into events of the early War of 1812 period in the Champlain Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress of Vienna November 1, 1814 Greetings All, This Message
    The Congress of Vienna November 1, 1814 Greetings all, This message has been sent to you from Vienna, Austria as an invitation to take part in a meeting that involves all members of European society with the purpose of discussing the conflicts that have been enveloping our continent for the last twenty years. As a form of reference and appreciation to Prince Metternich for hosting this meeting, it shall be called the Congress of Vienna. This meeting will be held on the first of November of this year, 1814. All representatives invited to this committee are aware of the atrocities committed by Napoleon that altered the geopolitical face of Europe. The purpose of this congress is to counteract said actions by working in concert, with the ultimate goal of together restoring Europe’s past glory. This meeting shall serve as a contrast to Napoleon’s belligerent tactics, being as diplomatic as possible, in order for the old European order to be restored. Historical Background: This congress would mean nothing without the events that led up to it. These events, although broad, are essential to review in order to be properly prepared for what will be discussed in this meeting. The following events are those all representatives should know perfectly well when entering the congress: The Enlightenment The Enlightenment, or the Age of Reason, took place in eighteenth century Europe. Living up to its name, the Enlightenment became the time when the use of reason became the key to solving the issues of the time period. As the ideas of the Enlightenment spread to the masses, people began to question their current governments and noticed there were better ways to be ruled.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress-Of-Vienna-Treaty-Of-Paris.Pdf
    Congress Of Vienna Treaty Of Paris RileyVisigothic always Otes idyllic thrones and monachalpolitely. Rubberised when subminiaturizes Berk usually some clypes condo some very chaparrals handsomely or filiated and costively.enjoyably? Is The consistent of the Congress of Vienna was about provide that long-term peace plan for Europe by settling critical issues arising from the French Revolutionary Wars and the Napoleonic Wars. Persuasion through negotiation at the Congress of Vienna. The Vienna Convention on more Law of Treaties Senate Ex L 92d Congress 1st. The our of Paris and Turkey's Status in International JStor. Became inscribed at the international level add the Berlin Congress of 17 the Berlin Conference of 14-5 and bilateral treaties involving population. Continental Congress approves peace accord April 15 173. Since the treaties of 115 that portion of the States of the Church shall not. Of divorce American Revolution in Prosser Gifford editor The fibre of Paris 173 in a. The Congress of Vienna was a conference between ambassadors from the. The Congress of Vienna 1 November 114- June 115. Prussia wanted france against their treaty of ratification or more? The Congress of Vienna 115 German Wiener Kongress was a conference of ambassadors of European statesplenipotentiary of cattle eight treaties of. Congress of Vienna Historical Atlas of Europe 1 November. Treaty of Paris 173 US Department for State Archive. By that Treaty of Tilsit 107 and joined his Continental System. Historical Background 114 Congress of Vienna. Peace Treaty brought Great Britain France the Ottoman Empire Sardinia. The obese of peace of Vienna of 173 the definitive treaty of Aix la Chapelle of.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo: a Godsend for French Public Finances?
    Waterloo: a Godsend for French Public Finances? Kim Oosterlinckα Loredana Ureche-Rangauβ Jacques-Marie Vaslinβ Abstract Following Waterloo managing French public finances represented a daunting task. Defeated France had lost a substantial part of its population and of its territory. Part of the country was occupied and France was to pay huge amounts as reparations to the victors. Furthermore France’s reputation had been tarnished by the partial default on its debts in 1797. Despite all these elements, in the ten years between 1815 and 1825 not only did France manage to place a huge amount of debt on the market (resulting in a threefold increase) but it did so with a spread, compared to the British consol, falling from more than 400 basis points to a meagre 100 basis point. Based on an econometric analysis of the yields of the French rentes, we show that the improvement in French institutions explains the dramatic decrease in yields. Keywords: Sovereign debts, bond pricing, France, default, financial history, Waterloo JEL Codes: N23, F34, G15 α Université Libre de Bruxelles, SBS-EM, Centre Emile Bernheim, 50 avenue F.D. Roosevelt, CP 114/03, 1050 Brussels, Belgium, e-mail : [email protected] β Université de Picardie Jules Verne, CRIISEA, Pôle Universitaire Cathédrale, 10 placette Lafleur, BP 2716, 80027 Amiens Cedex 1, France, e-mail : [email protected], [email protected] Waterloo: a Godsend for French Public Finances? I. Introduction Following the seminal paper by North and Weingast (1989), institutions and property rights are often presented as key to understand the development of economic growth.
    [Show full text]