Los Angeles, California Westside
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
City of West Hollywood Appendix J
R2, R3, R4 Multi-Family Survey Report City of West Hollywood Appendix J: 1986-87 Survey Context, prepared by Johnson Heumann Research Associates Appendices November 2008 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP Architects, Planners & Conservators, Inc. when a small group of citizens formed the West Hollywood Incorporation Committee. By November of that year, studies by the Local Agency Formation Commission confirmed that incorporation was indeed economically feasible. Tenants led by the Coalition for Economic Survival, homeowners concerned with planning issues and the gay community were among the leading advocates of cityhoog. Formal application was made on April 4, 1984. On November 4, 1984, by a 4:1 favorable margin, the voters approved incorporation . One of the new city's first tasks was to begin to draft a General Plan , the land use policy document for the municipality required· by State law. In January of 1985, the city began the process of preparing the Plan, noting that the physical environment, social character and quality of life within the City would be influenced by the General Plan. It was a stated goal to link land use and urban design, emphasizing the relationship between parcels and uses throughout the city. A reduction of density from those outlined in the West Hollywood Community Plan, .---- prepared before incorporated by the County of Los Angeles, was planned. As an i ntegral part of this planning process. the city of West Hollywood applied for c survey grant from the State Off ice of Historic Preservation in November of 1985 . 1.2 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY The area now known as West Hollywood has played a key role in t h e development of Los Angeles County west of Los Angeles . -
South Carthay PP Draft.Indd
South Carthay HPOZ Preservation Plan City of Los Angeles Adopted December 9, 2010 Preservation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: 5 Mission Statement Chapter 2: 7 Goals & Objectives Chapter 3: 9 Function of the Plan Chapter 4: 17 Context Statement Chapter 5: 21 Historic Resources Survey Chapter 6: 23 Architectural Styles Chapter 7 41 Residential Rehabilitation Chapter 8: 57 Residential Additions Chapter 9: 61 Residential In-fi ll Chapter 10: 71 Public Realm Chapter 11: 75 Defi nitions 3 4 Preservation Plan Chapter 1 Mission Statement acilitate the vitality of the district as a livable and sustainable Fneighborhood through the restoration, preservation and enhancement of structures, landscaping and natural features. 5 6 Preservation Plan Chapter 2 Goals & Objectives Goal 1 Preserve The Historic Character Of The Community Objective 1.1 Safeguard the character of historic buildings and sites Objective 1.2 Recognize and protect the historic streetscape and development patterns Objective 1.3 Ensure rehabilitation and new construction within the district complements the historic fabric Objective 1.4 Recognize that the preservation of the character of the district as a whole takes precedence over the treatment of individual structures or sites. Goal 2 Preserve The Historic Streetscape Objective 2.1 Encourage and maintain traditional front yards. Objective 2.2 Promote retention of historic landscape features Goal 3 Preserve The Historic Appearance Of Residential Structures Objective 3.1 Encourage retention of signifi cant architectural features Goal -
Coalition Politics and the Expansion of L.A.'S Transit System
Coalition Politics and the Expansion of L.A.’s Transit System By David Luberoff Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (center) celebrating the passage of Measure R in November 2008 with (from left to right): Tracy Rafter, Jerry Givens, Metro Board Member Richard Katz, Matt Raymond, Metro Board Member and County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, Assemblyman Mike Feuer, Denny Zane, David Fleming, and Terence O’Day. This case was written by David Luberoff, Lecturer on Sociology at Harvard University, for the project on “Transforming Urban Transport – the Role of Political Leadership,” at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design (GSD), with financing from the Volvo Research and Educational Foundations (VREF). Alan Altshuler, Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard emeritus, provided counsel and editing assistance. The author is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information in the case, which does not necessarily reflect the views of VREF or GSD. © 2016 The President and Fellows of Harvard College. Draft: May 2016; Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute Without Permission. Coalition Politics and the Expansion of LA’s Transit System Page 2 Table of Contents Overview ................................................................................................................................... 1 Context: Development and Transportation in Los Angeles ...................................................... 4 Getting the MTA Back on Track .............................................................................................. 8 Creating -
Powerpoint Template
The Challenges of Planning and Executing Major Underground Transit Programs in Los Angeles Bryan Pennington, Senior Executive Officer, Program Management • Nation’s third largest transportation system • FY2018 Budget of $6.1 billion • Over 9,000 employees • Nation’s largest clean-air fleet (over 2,200 CNG buses) • 450 miles of Metro Rapid Bus System • 131.7 miles of Metro Rail (113 stations) • Average Weekday Boardings (Bus & Rail) – 1.2 million • 513 miles of freeway HOV lanes 2 • New rail and bus rapid transit projects • New highway projects • Enhanced bus and rail service • Local street, signal, bike/pedestrian improvements • Affordable fares for seniors, students and persons with disabilities • Maintenance/replacement of aging system • Bike and pedestrian connections to transit facilities 3 4 5 6 7 • New rail and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) capital projects • Rail yards, rail cars, and start-up buses for new BRT lines • Includes 2% for system-wide connectivity projects such as airports, countywide BRT, regional rail and Union Station 8 Directions Walk to Blue Line and travel to Union Station Southwest Chief to Los Angeles Union Station 9 • Rail transit projects • Crenshaw LAX Transit Project • Regional Connector Transit Project • Westside Purple Line Extension Project • Critical success factors • Financial considerations/risk management • Contract strategy • Lessons learned • Future underground construction • Concluding remarks • Questions and answers 10 11 •Los Angeles Basin •Faults •Hydrocarbons •Groundwater •Seismicity •Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide 12 •Crenshaw LAX Transit Project •Regional Connector Transit Project •Westside Purple Line Extension Project • Section 1 • Section 2 • Section 3 13 • 13.7 km Light Rail • 8 Stations • Aerial Grade Separations, Below Grade, At-Grade Construction • Maintenance Facility Yard • $1.3 Billion Construction Contract Awarded to Walsh / Shea J.V. -
Notice of Preparation (NOP) Must Be Provided During This Response Period
DEPARTMENT OF EXECUTIVE OFFICES CITY PLANNING City of Los Angeles 200 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 525 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-4801 - CALIFORNIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP DAVID H. J. AMBROZ DIRECTOR PRESIDENT (213) 978-1271 RENEE DAKE WILSON VICE-PRESIDENT KEVIN J. KELLER, AICP EXECUTIVE OFFICER CAROLINE CHOE (213) 978-1272 VAHID KHORSAND KAREN MACK LISA M. WEBBER, AICP SAMANTHA MILLMAN DEPUTY DIRECTOR MARC MITCHELL (213) 978-1274 VERONICA PADILLA-CAMPOS ERIC GARCETTI DANA M. PERLMAN MAYOR http://planning.lacity.org ROCKY WILES COMMISSION OFFICE MANAGER (213) 978-1300 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND NOTICE OF SCOPING MEETING FOR THE PURPLE LINE TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN PROJECT, AND ASSOCIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT NEW ZONES AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR PORTIONS OF THE WILSHIRE COMMUNITY PLAN AREA TO: Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties DATE: July 12, 2018 The City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning (DCP), as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to evaluate the Purple Line Transit Neighborhood Plan Project or “Project.” The Project will include: (1) land use and zoning changes for select properties within proximity to the Purple Line Extension area (“Project Area”, as shown in Figure 1); (2) amendments to the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to adopt new zoning regulations as part of the re:code LA program (“Zoning Code Update”); (3) other necessary amendments to the Wilshire Community Plan, the General Plan Framework Element, the Mobility Plan, other General Plan elements; and (4) ordinances to effectuate changes to overlay zones, the LAMC, and other land use regulations, as may be necessary, to implement the above. -
West Los Angeles Rents Continue to Rise
Research & Forecast Report WEST LOS ANGELES | OFFICE Accelerating success. Q2 2019 >> West Los Angeles Rents Continue to Rise Key Takeaways Market Indicators | Relative to Prior Period > The average asking monthly rent for West Los Angeles Q2 2019 Forecast sustained its second straight quarter of $0.10 increases, Vacancy moving to $4.92 per square foot (PSF) full service gross Net Absorption (FSG). Construction > Demand recorded 315,900 square feet, the ninth straight Rental Rate quarter of positive absorption. > No new projects delivered from the under-construction pipeline. A total of 18 buildings remain in the pipeline. Summary Statistics | West Los Angeles, Q2 2019 > Investment activity maintained momentum with four Class A Class B All Classes properties trading, highlighted by Onni Group’s long-awaited Vacancy Rate 13.4% 9.4% 12.4% acquisition of Wilshire Courtyard. Change from Q1 ‘19 -40 +80 -60 > Leasing activity recorded 1,348,500 square feet, marking (Basis Points) six consecutive quarters of velocity exceeding 1.1 million Net Absorption* +208.5 +92.4 +315.9 square feet. Century City, Culver City and Beverly Hills drove Construction Completions* 0.0 0.0 0.0 velocity for the quarter. Under Construction* 1,273.5 694.6 1,968.1 *SF, Thousands West Los Angeles Office Market Asking Rents | West Los Angeles, Q2 2019 Vacancy in the West L.A. market dropped by 60 basis points from the previous quarter, driven by absorption gains in Class A Class B All Classes Santa Monica and Brentwood. High leasing activity from legal, Average Asking Rent $4.93 $4.27 $4.92 Change from Q1 ‘19 entertainment and consumer product tenants in Century City, +$0.07 +$0.06 +$0.10 Culver City and Beverly Hills will help maintain demand levels ($) through the rest of 2019 and into 2020. -
11-Unit Apartment Community Located in Beverlywood
2009 PREUSS ROAD 11-UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY LOCATED IN BEVERLYWOOD 1 CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER All materials and information received or derived from KW Commercial its directors, officers, agents, advisors, affiliates and/or any third party sources are provided without representation or warranty as to com- pleteness , veracity, or accuracy, condition of the property, compliance or lack of compliance with applicable governmental requirements, developability or suitability, financial performance of the property, projected financial performance of the property for any party’s intended use or any and all other matters. Neither KW Commercial its directors, officers, agents, advisors, or affiliates makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to accuracy or completeness of the any materials or information provided, derived, or received. Materials and information from any source, whether written or verbal, that may be furnished for review are not a substitute for a party’s active conduct of its own due diligence to determine these and other matters of significance to such party. KW Commercial will not investigate or verify any such matters or conduct due diligence for a party unless otherwise agreed in writing. EACH PARTY SHALL CONDUCT ITS OWN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION AND DUE DILIGENCE Any party contemplating or under contract or in escrow for a transaction is urged to verify all information and to conduct their own inspections and investigations including through appropriate third party independent professionals selected by such party. All financial data should be verified by the party including by obtaining and reading applicable documents and reports and consulting appropriate indepen- dent professionals. KW Commercial makes no warranties and/or representations regarding the veracity, completeness, or relevance of any financial data or assumptions. -
Sunday 10:00AM Gratitude Meeting , Westside Hope Center, 11313 W Washington Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90066
Sunday 7:00PM Lil' Meeting in the Hood, Reed Park, Meets in- 8:30PM Five and Dime, Joslyn Park Auditorium, Meets in- 10:00AM Gratitude Meeting, Westside Hope Center, person and on Zoom ID: 8450904561 (no person, 633 Kensington Road, Santa Monica, CA, Meets in-person and on Zoom Id: 7948175359, passcode), 1133 7th Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90405 (O,SP,WC) 11313 West Washington Boulevard, Los Angeles, 90401 (O,D,SP,WC,NS,HY) Saturday CA, 90066 (O,D,WC,NS,HY) 7:30PM Malibu's Most Wanted, Our Lady Malibu, Meets 9:00AM Keep Coming Back (Steps 1 2 3), Meets 12:30PM Just for Today, Meets virtually on Zoom Id: in-person, 3625 Winter Canyon Road, Malibu, virtually on Zoom Id: 3562098677 Passcode: 274198755 (O,VM) 90265 (O,CL,D,SP,WC) saturday, Culver City, CA, 90230 1:00PM Serenity Above the Sea, Serra Retreat, Meets Wednesday (O,D,SP,St,WC,NS,VM) Password: saturday in-person, 3401 Serra Road, Malibu, California, 12:30PM Back From the Dead, Meets virtually on Zoom 9:00AM Serenity in the Sand, Santa Monica Beach, 90265 (O,D) Id: 274198755, Los Angeles, CA, 90066 South of Ocean Park Blvd., look for the WHITE 7:00PM Burning Desire, Westside Hope Center, Meets in- (O,D,WC,VM) FLAG, Between Lifeguard Towers 26 & 27, Santa person and on Zoom ID: 95228147621, 11313 6:00PM In Times of Illness, Meets virtually on Zoom Id: Monica, CA, 90405 (JT,ME,OUT) West Washington Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 89075266477, Culver City, CA, 90230 (O,IL,VM) 12:30PM Just for Today, Meets on Zoom ID: 274198755, 90066 (O,CL,D,SP,NS,HY) 8:00PM Grow or Go, Meets virtually on -
Los Angeles Metro Westside Subway Extension
This is a Draft Document Utility Conflicts Report Los Angeles Metro Westside Subway Extension Participants on this Report: Prepared By: PB America Inc.: Zafer Mudar, PE (commentaries) D'Leon Consulting Engineers Jose Varias 3605 Long Beach Blvd., Suite 235 Long Beach, CA 90807 D'Leon Consulting Engineers: T:(562)989-4500 / F: (562)989-4509 Domingo Leon, PE Email: [email protected] Sara Samaan Dung Quang Nguyen June 2014 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................................1 History and Background of the Westside Subway Extension Project ..............................................................1 Purpose and Need for Transit Improvements in the Study Area ......................................................................4 Alternatives Before Scoping Period .................................................................................................................6 Alternatives Considered in the Draft EIS/EIR................................................................................................11 2. Existing Utilities along Wilshire Blvd. Corridor at: La Brea Blvd, Fairfax Blvd, La Cienega Blvd. (Underground Stations).......................................................................................................................................................................27 Composite Existing Utilities - Description.....................................................................................................29 -
S&W Levitt VRA Counsel
Proposal to the Citizens Redistricting Commission Voting Rights Act Counsel Response to Request for Information for Legal Services January 29, 2021 STRUMWASSER ~ WOOCHER LLP PROFESSOR JUSTIN LEVITT Justin Levitt Strumwasser & Woocher LLP Burns 335 10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2000 919 Albany Street Los Angeles, California 90024 Los Angeles, California 90015 (310) 576-1233 (213) 736-7417 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Personnel Proposed for Engagement ............................................................................................... 1 Fredric D. Woocher ............................................................................................................................. 1 Professor Justin Levitt ......................................................................................................................... 2 Michael J. Strumwasser ........................................................................................................................ 2 Andrea Sheridan Ordin ....................................................................................................................... 3 Dale K. Larson ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Salvador E. Pérez ................................................................................................................................. 4 2a. About Strumwasser & Woocher LLP .............................................................................................. -
Secure Bike Parking on Metro
Secure Bike Parking on Metro Chatsworth Amtrak & Metrolink Nordhoff SAN FERNANDO VALLEY Lake Allen Sierra MadreArcadia VillaMonroviaDuarte/CityIrwindale of HopeAzusa DowntownAPU/Citrus College Roscoe GOLD LINE FOOTHILL EXTENSION Memorial Park Sherman Way SAN GABRIEL VALLEY Del Mar Canoga De Soto Pierce CollegeTampa Reseda Balboa Woodley SepulvedaVan NuysWoodmanValley CollegeLaurel Canyon North Hollywood Fillmore Universal City/Studio City Hollywood/Highland South Pasadena Hollywood/VineLAX FlyAway Highland Park Hollywood/Western Southwest Museum CENTRAL LA Vermont/Sunset Heritage Sq Vermont/Santa Monica Lincoln/Cypress Vermont/Beverly Chinatown PURPLE LINE EXTENSION Wilshire/WesternWilshire/Normandie Union Station Wilshire/Vermont Amtrak & Metrolink CivicGrand Ctr/Park Metrolink LAX FlyAway LAC+USC MedicalCal State Ctr LA El Monte Westlake/MacArthur Park WESTSIDE REGIONAL 7th St/Metro Ctr CONNECTOR Rail Station Pico Pershing Square LATTC/Ortho Transfer Soto Institute LittleArts Tokyo/ Dist Indiana Atlantic DOWNTOWN Pico/AlisoStation BuswayMaravillaStation LA Mariachi Plaza Grand/LATTC Busway Street East LA Civic Ctr Service Downtown17th Santa St/SMC Monica26th St/BergamotExpo/BundyExpo/SepulvedaWestwood/RanchoPalms Culver Park CityLa Cienega/JeffersonExpo/La BreaFarmdaleExpo/CrenshawExpo/WesternExpo/VermontExpoPark/USC UNDER EASTSIDECONSTRUCTION 37th St/ San Pedro St SANTA USC MONICA Jefferson/USC Washington Metro Rail Slauson Vernon Red Line CRENSHAW/ SOUTH LA Slauson North Hollywood to Union Station LAX PROJECT Purple Line PACIFIC OCEAN -
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 50 Years To
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 50 Years to the Wilshire Subway: The Political and Social Discourse Surrounding the Development of the Purple Line Extension THESIS submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Urban and Regional Planning by Olivia Harris Thesis Committee: Associate Professor Douglas Houston, Chair Assistant Professor Nicholas Marantz Associate Professor Walter Nicholls 2017 © 2017 Olivia Harris Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................... v ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS ................................................................................................................ vi 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Megaprojects: Overview, History, and Urban Theory ....................................................... 4 2.1.1 Overview of Mega-projects ................................................................................................................