DOCSLIB.ORG

Estero Bay Watershed Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estero Bay Watershed Assessment Estero Bay Watershed Assessment Volume D: Management Options - Draft Report - Prepared for: South Florida Water Management District P.O. Box 24680 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680 Prepared by: PBS&J, Inc. 5300 West Cypress Street Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33607-1712 July 1999 Estero Bay Watershed Assessment Volume D: Management Options - Draft Report - Prepared for: South Florida Water Management District P.O. Box 24680 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680 Prepared by: Ralph Montgomery, Project Manager Robert Woithe Pam Latham Douglas Robison PBS&J, Inc. 5300 West Cypress Street Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33607-1712 July, 1999 FOREWARD This report was prepared in fulfillment of the Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment being conducted by PBS&J, Inc. for the South Florida Water Management District under Contract No. C-7784. Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Management Options ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors of this report wish to acknowledge the contributions of a number of people. South Florida Water Management District staff, Terry Bray and Keith Kibbey of Lee County, David Burr and Wayne Daltry of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, Johnson Engineering, Inc., the Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Florida Fish and Game Commission all provided information necessary for developing and analyzing management options. We would also like to acknowledge the efforts of: Debra Childs for the GIS work; Anthony Janiki, Susan Janicki, and Ray Prible for data compilation, management and anlaysis; and Candace Daniel for word processing support. i-4 Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Management Options TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Study Area Characteristics ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Watershed Problems .................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4 Management Options ................................................................................................. 1-8 2.0 Prioritization of Basins .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Basin Prioritization Objectives .................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Urban Runoff Discharge ............................................................................................ 2-2 2.3 Agricultural Runoff Discharge ................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Total Suspended Solids Loading................................................................................ 2-4 2.5 Total Nitrogen Loading .............................................................................................. 2-6 2.6 Total Phosphorous Loading ....................................................................................... 2-7 2.7 Point Source Discharges ............................................................................................ 2-8 2.8 Overall Basin Prioritization ....................................................................................... 2-9 2.9 Wetlands at Risk ...................................................................................................... 2-10 3.0 Priority Tertiary Basins .................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Hendry Creek - 10 ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Hendry Creek - 8 ........................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3 Ten-Mile Canal - 11 ................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Mullock Creek - 4 ...................................................................................................... 3-4 3.5 Hendry Creek - 6 ........................................................................................................ 3-5 3.6 Hendry Creek - 9 ........................................................................................................ 3-6 3.7 Ten-Mile Canal - 4 ..................................................................................................... 3-7 3.8 Ten-Mile Canal - 9 ..................................................................................................... 3-8 4.0 Mangment Options ........................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Regional Surfacewater Treatment Facilities .............................................................. 4-6 4.2 Demonstrating Concurrence With Load Reductions ................................................. 4-7 4.3 Greater Treatment and Attenuation ............................................................................ 4-8 4.4 Mullock Creek Subbasin-Complex ............................................................................ 4-8 4.5 Imperial River Subbasin........................................................................................... 4-12 4.6 Wetlands at Risk ...................................................................................................... 4-14 4.7 Summary .................................................................................................................. 4-16 5.0 References Cited .............................................................................................................. 5-1 i-5 Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Management Options i-6 Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Management Options i-7 Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Management Options 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report, “Management Options for the Estero Bay Watershed,” forms Volume D of a series of reports developed for the South Florida Water Management District’s (SFWMD) Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Plan. Reports in the Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Plan series are listed below. ! Volume A. Literature Survey of the Estero Bay Watershed ! Volume B. Characterization Report ! Volume C. Basin Prioritization Report ! Volume D. Management Options Report ! Volume E. Monitoring Report ! Volume F. Estero Bay Resources Plan 1.1 BACKGROUND Estero Bay has long been recognized as one of Florida’s significant natural resources. The Bay was designated as the State’s first Aquatic Preserve. The Bay’s watershed also has a long history of both pre-Columbian and modern settlement and agriculture. The area in and around the Estero Bay watershed has undergone dramatic increases in the rate of residential and commercial development as well as population growth during the past 15 years. As a result, a series of initiatives has been proposed to balance development and environmental interests in the region. These initiatives are listed below and are discussed at length in other volumes of this report ! Arnold Committee, ! Estero Bay Agency on Bay Management, ! Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, ! Corps of Engineers Environmental Impact Statement, and the ! South Lee County Watershed Plan. \\SERVER1\SWFRPC\COUNCIL COMMITTEES\ESTERO BAY AGENCY ON BAY MANAGEMENT\ESTERO BAY AND WATERSHED ASSESSMENT VOLUME D_MANAGEMENT OPTIONS\CHAP_1.DOC -1 Estero Bay and Watershed Assessment Management Options 1.2 STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS This report describes and analyzes management options for Florida’s Estero Bay Watershed . The watershed includes a portion of Lee County south of the Caloosahatchee River, parts of northeastern Collier County, and a small area of Hendry County (Figure 1-1). A substantial portion of the northern watershed area is within the City of Ft. Myers. Other population centers in the watershed are Bonita Springs and the City of Ft. Myers Beach. The Estero Bay watershed includes all of Estero Bay, most of which lies within the Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve, and the adjacent barrier islands. Hendry Creek, Mullock Creek, the Estero River, areas of Corkscrew Swamp, Flint Pen Strand, Spring Creek, and the Imperial River are major surface water features in the watershed. Hendry Creek, Mullock Creek, Estero River, Spring Creek, and the Imperial River experience some degree of tidal influenced. The portion of the Estero River east of U.S. 41 is a slow conveyance system and is considered a recharge area along with the Imperial River east of I-75 (SWFRPC, 1995). Local drainage canals tend to provide some regional flood protection during wet periods, but also lead to over-drainage during dry periods. The Estero Bay Watershed is divided into the nine secondary basins for the purpose of this report. These basins are listed below. ! Estero River ! Ten-Mile Canal ! Spring Creek ! Cow Creek ! Hendry Creek ! Imperial River ! Mullock Creek ! Barrier Islands ! Six-Mile Cypress Slough Cow, Hendry, and Mullock creeks are coastal basins that flow into north Estero Bay. Six-Mile Cypress Slough and Ten Mile Canal do not have direct discharges to the bay, but they are important sources for Mullock Creek, which flows directly into the bay. The Estero River and Spring Creek flow into Estero Bay in the central
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019
    FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MARINE MAMMAL PATHOBIOLOGY LABORATORY 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019 County Date Field ID Sex Size Waterway City Probable Cause (cm) Nassau 01/01/2019 MNE19001 M 275 Nassau River Yulee Natural: Cold Stress Hillsborough 01/01/2019 MNW19001 M 221 Hillsborough Bay Apollo Beach Natural: Cold Stress Monroe 01/01/2019 MSW19001 M 275 Florida Bay Flamingo Undetermined: Other Lee 01/01/2019 MSW19002 M 170 Caloosahatchee River North Fort Myers Verified: Not Recovered Manatee 01/02/2019 MNW19002 M 213 Braden River Bradenton Natural: Cold Stress Putnam 01/03/2019 MNE19002 M 175 Lake Ocklawaha Palatka Undetermined: Too Decomposed Broward 01/03/2019 MSE19001 M 246 North Fork New River Fort Lauderdale Natural: Cold Stress Volusia 01/04/2019 MEC19002 U 275 Mosquito Lagoon Oak Hill Undetermined: Too Decomposed St. Lucie 01/04/2019 MSE19002 F 226 Indian River Fort Pierce Natural: Cold Stress Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19003 F 264 Whiskey Creek Fort Myers Human Related: Watercraft Collision Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19004 F 285 Mullock Creek Fort Myers Undetermined: Too Decomposed Citrus 01/07/2019 MNW19003 M 275 Gulf of Mexico Crystal River Verified: Not Recovered Collier 01/07/2019 MSW19005 M 270 Factory Bay Marco Island Natural: Other Lee 01/07/2019 MSW19006 U 245 Pine Island Sound Bokeelia Verified: Not Recovered Lee 01/08/2019 MSW19007 M 254 Matlacha Pass Matlacha Human Related: Watercraft Collision Citrus 01/09/2019 MNW19004 F 245 Homosassa River Homosassa
    [Show full text]
  • Late Holocene Sea Level Rise in Southwest Florida: Implications for Estuarine Management and Coastal Evolution
    LATE HOLOCENE SEA LEVEL RISE IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: IMPLICATIONS FOR ESTUARINE MANAGEMENT AND COASTAL EVOLUTION Dana Derickson, Figure 2 FACULTY Lily Lowery, University of the South Mike Savarese, Florida Gulf Coast University Stephanie Obley, Flroida Gulf Coast University Leonre Tedesco, Indiana University and Purdue Monica Roth, SUNYOneonta University at Indianapolis Ramon Lopez, Vassar College Carol Mankiewcz, Beloit College Lora Shrake, TA, Indiana University and Purdue University at Indianapolis VISITING and PARTNER SCIENTISTS Gary Lytton, Michael Shirley, Judy Haner, STUDENTS Leslie Breland, Dave Liccardi, Chuck Margo Burton, Whitman College McKenna, Steve Theberge, Pat O’Donnell, Heather Stoffel, Melissa Hennig, and Renee Dana Derickson, Trinity University Wilson, Rookery Bay NERR Leda Jackson, Indiana University and Purdue Joe Kakareka, Aswani Volety, and Win University at Indianapolis Everham, Florida Gulf Coast University Chris Kitchen, Whitman College Beth A. Palmer, Consortium Coordinator Nicholas Levsen, Beloit College Emily Lindland, Florida Gulf Coast University LATE HOLOCENE SEA LEVEL RISE IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: IMPLICATIONS FOR ESTUARINE MANAGEMENT AND COASTAL EVOLUTION MICHAEL SAVARESE, Florida Gulf Coast University LENORE P. TEDESCO, Indiana/Purdue University at Indianapolis CAROL MANKIEWICZ, Beloit College LORA SHRAKE, TA, Indiana/Purdue University at Indianapolis PROJECT OVERVIEW complicating environmental management are the needs of many federally and state-listed Southwest Florida encompasses one of the endangered species, including the Florida fastest growing regions in the United States. panther and West Indian manatee. Watershed The two southwestern coastal counties, Collier management must also consider these issues and Lee Counties, commonly make it among of environmental health and conservation. the 5 fastest growing population centers on nation- and statewide censuses.
    [Show full text]
  • C-43 Caloosahatchee River Watershed Protection Plan
    Caloosahatchee River Watershed Protection Plan APPENDICES January 2009 APPENDICES A – Performance Measure and Performance Indicator Fact Sheets B – Management Measure Tool Box and Fact Sheets C – Northern Everglades Regional Simulation Model D – Nutrient Loading Rates, Reduction Factors and Implementation Costs Associated with BMPs and Technologies E – Caloosahatchee River Watershed Research and Water Quality Monitoring Program F – Plan Operations & Maintenance, Permitting, and Monitoring G – Potential Funding Sources H – Agency and Public Comments and Responses APPENDIX A PERFORMANCE MEASURE AND PERFORMANCE INDICATOR FACT SHEETS Appendix A Caloosahatchee River and Estuary Performance Measures Number of Times Caloosahatchee Estuary High Discharge Criteria Exceeded Performance Measure: Number of Times Caloosahatchee Estuary High Discharge Criteria Exceeded – Mean Monthly Flows >2,800 cfs and Mean Monthly Flows > 4,500 cfs Description – The Lake Okeechobee WSE Regulation Schedule is applied to regulate (flood control) discharges to the Caloosahatchee River, and subsequently to the Caloosahatchee Estuary, when lake stages are high. The Caloosahatchee River has primary capacity for local inflows and is only utilized for Caloosahatchee Estuary discharges when there is secondary capacity available. The number of times that the Caloosahatchee Estuary high discharge criterion is exceeded must be limited to prevent destructive impacts on the estuary. Rationale – Researchers have observed an increased rate of eutrophication in Lake Okeechobee from 1973 to the present. Symptoms of this eutrophication include the following: • increases in algal bloom frequency since the mid-1980s (with an algal bloom being defined as chlorophyll-a concentrations greater than 40 μg/L) (Maceina 1993, Carrick et al. 1994, Havens et al. 1995b), • increases in the dominance of blue-green algae following a shift in the TN:TP ratio (Smith et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Estero River for the Village of Estero
    The Significance of the Estero River for the Village of Estero Photo: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Estuary = “Estero” Estero Bay Watershed Estero Bay Watershed: 360 square miles Pine Island Caloosahatchee Sound Matlacha Watershed Pass Watershed Estero River Basin: 66 square miles (45,000 acres) Estero River: Approximately 8 miles long Mean depth of 3.99 feet and a max depth of 12.06 feet (USF, 2013) Estero Bay Aquatic Preserve: 18,829 acres Source: Estero Bay Agency on Bay Management, State of the Bay Update 2014 Halfway Headwaters Wild Turkey Pond Strand Preserve Imperial Marsh Preserve To Estero River Flows (Source, South Lee County Watershed Plan Update, May 14, 2009) History Source: Estero Historical Society Estero River 1957, State Archives of Florida Historical Collection Estero River, Circa 1900 source: FGCU Collection / Koreshan “A Historical Geography of Southwest Florida Waterways , Vol. II Source: Estero Historical Society Pre-Development Conditions 1944 1953 1998 Courtesy: Lee County Natural Resources What happens in the DRGR affects Estero River and Estero Bay 1953 Hydropatterns 2007 Hydropatterns Source: Kevin Erwin, Consulting Ecologist Vegetation (Source: USF, West-Central Florida Tidal Stream Assessment Study, p. 123) Wildlife Listed Animal Species Gulf sturgeon roseate spoonbill American alligator peregrine falcon loggerhead turtle southeastern American kestrel common snook gopher tortoise Number of Known Atlantic green turtle American oystercatcher Native Species leatherback bald eagle Mammals: 37
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Contamination and Impacts to Water Supply
    SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT March 2007 Final Draft CCoonnssoolliiddaatteedd WWaatteerr SSuuppppllyy PPllaann SSUUPPPPOORRTT DDOOCCUUMMEENNTT Water Supply Department South Florida Water Managemment District TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss List of Tables and Figures................................................................................v Acronyms and Abbreviations........................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction..................................................................................1 Basis of Water Supply Planning.....................................................................1 Legal Authority and Requirements ................................................................1 Water Supply Planning Initiative...................................................................4 Water Supply Planning History .....................................................................4 Districtwide Water Supply Assessment............................................................5 Regional Water Supply Plans .......................................................................6 Chapter 2: Natural Systems .............................................................................7 Overview...............................................................................................7 Major Surface Water Features.................................................................... 13 Kissimmee Basin and Chain of Lakes ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1 Wildlife Habitat
    1 Acknowledgements The Conservancy of Southwest Florida gratefully acknowledges the Policy Division staff and interns for their help in compiling, drafting, and revising the first Estuaries Report Card , including Jennifer Hecker, the report’s primary author. In addition, the Conservancy’s Science Division is gratefully acknowledged for its thorough review and suggestions in producing the finished report. The Conservancy would also like to thank Joseph N. Boyer, Ph. D. (Associate Director and scientist from Florida International University – Southeast Environmental Research Center), Charles “Chuck” Jacoby, Ph. D. (Estuarine Ecology Specialist from the University of Florida), S. Gregory Tolley, Ph. D. (Professor of Marine Science and Director of the Coastal Watershed Institute from Florida Gulf Coast University) as well as Lisa Beever, Ph. D. (Director of the Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program) for their review and/or support of this first edition of the Estuaries Report Card. In addition, special thanks goes to the Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program for its generous financial contribution to the 2005 report. The Conservancy thanks the following for their generous financial support in making this report possible: Anonymous supporter (1); Banbury Fund; Elizabeth Ordway Dunn Foundation; and The Stranahan Foundation Photo Credits: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Department of Commerce, cover image South Florida Water Management District, pages 4, 6, 23, 36, 41, 63, 105, 109, 117, 147, 166, 176 The recommendations listed herein are those of the Conservancy of Southwest Florida and do not necessarily reflect the view of our report sponsors. © 2005 Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Inc. The Conservancy of Southwest Florida is a non-profit organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumnavigational Trail Data Book PC = Primitive Campsite POI
    Circumnavigational Trail Data Book PC = Primitive campsite POI = Point of Interest/landmark C = Campground LA = Laundromat W = Water L = Lodging I = Internet computer PO = Post Office R = Restaurant S = Shower G = medium/lg supermarkets B = Bathroom PI = Put-In g = convenience/camp stores Mile # Type of amenity GPS # on OGT Directions trail Seg- ment (decimal- and degrees) Map # 0 PC/log-book N30.3100 1/1-A On trail (Big Lagoon State W87.4029 Park, Pensacola) 6 PC N30.3181 1/1-A On trail W87.3321 (Gulf Shores National Seashore) N30.3298 1/1-A On trail 8 POI (Ft. Pickens) W87.3018 14.4 W, R N30.3270 1/1-B On trail (Gulf Islands National W87.1809 Seashore Park) 17 L, R, I N30.3329 1/1-B Just before southern end of bridge W87.1438 (Comfort Inn) 18 L, R N30.3357 1/1-B Just past southern end of bridge W87.1338 (Paradise Inn) (1 mile R, W N30.3637 1/1-B 2 miles past bridge on north side north of (Gulf Shores Visitor’s W87.1296 route) Center) 23 PC (Big Sabine Point) N30.3533 1/2A On Santa Rosa Island; water, restrooms and W87.0524 showers .5 mile south. No fires allowed at campsite. (1 mile PI (no facilities) N30.3740 1/2A North side of sound north of W87.0924 route) 27.8 PI (no facilities) N30.3874 1/2A North side of sound W86.9967 35 G, L, I (Best Western), N30.4007 1/2B North side of sound just past bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Florida Environmental Initiatives Conference PRACTICUM BACKGROUND
    Agency For Bay Management Presents: Southwest Florida Environmental Initiatives Conference PRACTICUM BACKGROUND Johnson Engineering, Inc. •Almost 60 Years Experience – Founded In 1946. •One of The Largest Engineering Firms In Southwest Florida •Provides Engineering, Survey, Planning, Landscape Architecture And Environmental Services •Over 210 Employees PRACTICUM BACKGROUND Agency for Bay Management (ABM) •Created by Settlement Agreement for Florida Gulf Coast University •Assesses Overall Land Use and Natural Systems, Environmental Protection and Mitigation tools in the Estero bay Watershed Concerned Citizen Goals • Communicate environmental programs to public • Bridge gaps between policy and real world • Identify project for funding Who should present issues? •Environmental Protection Agency – Water Quality •Florida Department Of Environmental Protection – Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) •South Florida Water Management District – Lake Okeechobee, Babcock, etc. •Conservancy Of Southwest Florida – Rule Challenges. •U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers – Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), Watershed Approach •Lee County – Best Management Practices (BMP), Master Mitigation Plan Who to sponsor? •Consultants •Non-profit Agencies •Attorneys •Developers How to invite attendees? •E-mail •Mail •Post Event set-Up •Moderator •Fee •Location •Food •Entertainment Final Line Up •FDEP – Karen Bickford •U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers – Chuck Scheppell •Lee County – Roland Ottolini •SFWMD – Jacque Rippe •Estero Bay Nutrient Management Partnership – Janet Strutzel
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(D), 305(B), and 314 Report and Listing Update
    2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 Report and Listing Update Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection June 2020 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 floridadep.gov 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 This Page Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 160 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 Letter to Floridians Ron DeSantis FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Governor Jeanette Nuñez Environmental Protection Lt. Governor Bob Martinez Center Noah Valenstein 2600 Blair Stone Road Secretary Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 June 16, 2020 Dear Floridians: It is with great pleasure that we present to you the 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida. This report meets the Federal Clean Water Act reporting requirements; more importantly, it presents a comprehensive analysis of the quality of our waters. This report would not be possible without the monitoring efforts of organizations throughout the state, including state and local governments, universities, and volunteer groups who agree that our waters are a central part of our state’s culture, heritage, and way of life. In Florida, monitoring efforts at all levels result in substantially more monitoring stations and water quality data than most other states in the nation. These water quality data are used annually for the assessment of waterbody health by means of a comprehensive approach. Hundreds of assessments of individual waterbodies are conducted each year. Additionally, as part of this report, a statewide water quality condition is presented using an unbiased random monitoring design. These efforts allow us to understand the state’s water conditions, make decisions that further enhance our waterways, and focus our efforts on addressing problems.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Bay Update Estero Bay Agency on Bay Manag on Bay Agency Bay Estero
    ement 2009 State of the Bay Update Estero Bay Agency on Bay Manag on Bay Agency Bay Estero Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Avenue, Fort Myers, Florida Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Principles of the Estero Bay Agency on Bay Management ................................................................................................. 6 Human History of Estero Bay ................................................................................................................................................ 11 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................................................ 19 2008 Water Quality Status ................................................................................................................................................ 19 Comparison of Water Quality Standards .......................................................................................................................... 20 Impaired Waters ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of the Museum of the Everglades August 2017
    Friends of the Museum of the Everglades August 2017 Volume XVII Issue 6 FME, P.O. Box 677, Everglades City, FL 34139 August 2017 Website: www.evergladesmuseum.org email: [email protected] Mark Your Calendar Pauline Reeves Gallery Board Meeting Everglades City Students’ Work Displayed September 5, 2017 During the summer months student artists from the Everglades City School had their work 3:30 pm City Hall displayed. Under the direction of their art teacher, Mr. Tribble, more than 30 students have their two dimension art work on display. From the abstract to realism, from portraits to Pauline Reeves Gallery landscapes the talent displayed by students from Kindergarten to grade 12 is inspiring. June & July One of the artists, Dylan Doster, whose work is on display received the Carol Moseman Student Art Work Scholarship Award in the amount of $500. The money will be sent to the Lorenzo Walker School in Naples where Dylan plans to further his studies. This scholarship is presented by the August Friends of the Museum each year to an aspiring artist. Gallery Closed for Renovation Volunteer Spotlight Georgia Garrett Inside This Issue Museuming p. 2 Koreshan Unity Franconian Museum Volunteer Spotlight p. 3 Bridging Gaps Director’s Note p. 4 A monument to the Chokoloskee Bridge is being used to bridge the museum’s new parking lot to the Museum of the Everglades. Built in 1955 the original bridge connected the small shell island of `` ` Chokoloskee to the mainland. This crosswalk will be finished soon making a wonderful addition to the museum. The Museum is located at 105 West Broadway, Everglades City, telephone (239) 695-0008 Open to the public Monday through Saturday, 9 am to 4 pm Volume XVII Issue 6 FME, P.O.
    [Show full text]