Militias and "Common • Law Courts" • Wage War— Against Tlie Government

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Militias and Militias and "Common • Law Courts" • Wage War— Against tlie Government ^07t^T6fS OF THE Irauwa4tJ fell/ of'do i, THE 6Lx»^ JIM J(/<i^*4(: .Y^.^y . •—-— J/dd/»^lit "cation ofth e Ant.-Defamafon League ^^^Anti-DetamatioAnti-Detamationleaguleagu ee ® David H. Strassler, National Chair Abraham H. Foxman, National Director Howard P. Berkowitz,Chair, National Executive Committee Peter T. Willner, Chief Operating Officer Kenneth Jacobson, Assistant National Director Robert G. Sugarman, Chair, National Civil RightsCommittee Gail L. Gans, Acting Director, Fact Finding Department This report has been made possible through a generous grant from the William and Naomi Gorowitz Institute on Terrorism and Extremism Copies of this report are in the Rita and Leo Greenland Human Relations Library and Resource Center This publication was prepared by: Lori Linzer, Assistant Director, Fact Finding Department David Rosenberg, Assistant Director, Fact Finding Department Designed by: Jan Phair ®199 7 Anti-DefamationLeagu e Printed in the UnitedState so f America All rightsreserve d Table of Contents Executive Summary ii Introduction 1 "Crossovers" 4 Criminal Activity 10 The Violent Fringe 19 Conspiracy Theories: The Bedrock of Militia Belief 22 Anti-Semitism and Racism 25 Political Involvement 30 The Internet 33 Preparedness Expos 38 STATE-by-STATE Western States 39 Northeastern States 43 Midwestern States 45 Southern States 48 APPENDIX A ADL Model Anti-Paramilitary Statute 53 APPENDIX B ADL Model Anti-"Common Law Courts" Statute 54 INDEX 55 Executive Summary Introduction I. AnAD L survey oftoday' s anti-government extremists finds that armed miUtias, although fewer in number, continue to pose a significant threat ofviolenc e and disorder. Rumorso f secretive miHtias abound but, not surprisingly,supportin g evidence is scant. What is clear is that many mihtias now dodge the watchful eyes ofth e policean d the pressb y holdingsmall , unadvertised meetings in private homes and by no longer publicly identifyingthemselve s as militias. II. Militias have expanded in five states, remained relativelystabl e in about 20 states and de­ clined elsewhere. Buta t the same time, the "commonla wcourt " movement, which seeks to replace our legal system with one ofvigilant ejustice , is flourishing; many militiamenan d their supporters are becoming involved in its pseudo-legal activities. "Common Law Courts" III. The "commonla w court" activists' tactic ofchoic e is to defy the legitimate institutionso f government, especiallythei r judicial and law enforcement arms, by replacingthe m with a parallel structure ofthei r own creation. These pseudo-jurists render unenforceable judg­ ments regarding genuine legal disputes and issue phony legal documents including property liens and criminal indictments, in an effort to intimidate or defraud their enemies. IV. "Commonla w court" adherents use outlandish versions ofAmerica n history and bizarre conspiracy theories tojustif y their activities.Man y groups promote anti-Semiticviews ,in ­ cluding the notorious fraud that Jewishbankin g familiesow n the Federal Reserve. MilitiaViolenc e V. while militias have stagnated over the last 18months , some ofthei r members have been involved in scores ofcrimina l acts. They have acquired illegal ammunition andbomb-makin g materials, planned or committed criminal acts ofviolenc e against Federalbuilding so r offi­ cials, and engaged inbitter , even deadly, confrontations with police officers. Their decreased numbers can largelyb e credited to stepped-up vigilance by law enforcement officials. VI. The proclivity toward violence ofth e hard-core anti-government extremists remains firm­ ly in place. Thiswa s recently demonstrated by the terrorist acts oftw o smallband s ofracist , anti-government, would-be revolutionaries. Theirbran d ofextremis t violence should cause concernbecaus e many militiasar e reportedly adopting their tactic of"leaderles s resistance." ossovers" VII. Ever-increasing cross-fertilization between various strands ofth e anti-government extremist movement has begun toblu r the differences that previouslyexiste dbetwee n them. Many activistshav e joinedbot h militia and "commonla w court" groups, breaking down the boundaries altogether The Republic ofTfexas , a San Antonio-basedgrou p that considers itself to be the true LoneSta r State, represents the most comprehensive form ofthi s "crossover" trend. VIII. The growingtendenc y ofanti-governmen t extremists tobroade n their activitiesan d affiliations will likely result in a stronger, more effective overall movement. IX. Severalpublication sappealin g to broad swatches ofth e movement serve as abridg e between different anti-government extremist groups by familiarizing extremists with the views and tactics ofthei r fellow activists. It is also common for literature issuedb y one seg­ ment ofth e movement to surface, orb e used as recruitingtools , among members of another faction. mina lActivit y X. Right-wing anti-government extremists often view law enforcement agents as the foot sol­ diers in a Federal plot to impose tyranny. They refuse to recognize their authority, and reject any laws they deem tob e intrusive.Thei rdefian t stance has ledt o heated — andoccasional ­ ly deadly — encounters with authorities on the local, state and Federal level. XI. The anti-government militancy ofth e so-calledMontan a"Freemen " has inspiredlike - minded activistsi n at least 23state s to file bogus liens,pas sphon y checks, set up "common law courts" and deny the very legitimacyo fth e U.S. Government. Other anti-government extremists, unconnected to the Freemen, have also committed similar acts offrau d against private citizensan d government institutions. cism andAnti-Semitis m XII. Anti-Semites and racists have found a comfortable home in segments ofth e anti-govern­ ment extremist movement. Much ofth e movement's activityi s directedb y groups that pro­ mote anti-Semitisman d racism in additiont o their more visible agitation against the govern­ ment. Propaganda materials passed around at meetings, conventions, gun shows and over the Internet assert that Jews or Jewishinstitution s are co-conspirators in the "New World Order," while classicanti-Semiti c literature ishawke d at militia and "commonla w courf'-oriented events. XIII. Ideas associated with the pseudo-religious, racist and anti-JewishChristia n Identity doc­ trine permeate many "commonla w court" documents and propaganda materials. Inaddition , a number ofth e MontanaFreeme n hold Christian Identitybeliefs . n XIV. While many anti-government extremists reject the blatant hatred espoused by neo-Nazi groups or the KuKlu x Klan, the movement allowsmor e subtle bigots to use Jews, Blacks and other minoritiesa s scapegoats for the nation's problems, both real andimagined . Conspiracies XV. Militia and "commonla w court" ideologues insist that gun controllegislatio n— especial­ ly the Brady Lawan d restrictions on assault weapons — are major components ofa secret and evil government conspiracyt o disarm and controlth e American people. They see an evil Federal Government working inleagu e with the United Nationst o strip Americans of their constitutionalright s and impose a tyrannical "New World Order" Preparedness Expos XVI. Anti-governmentextremist s attempt to recruit sympathizers at gatherings called "Pre­ paredness Expos." These shows primarily feature materials and paraphernalia related to sur- vivalism, but many seminars and speeches presented at the expos are devoted to extremist politics and conspiracytheories . Recent expos featured Christian Identity literature and anti- Semitic tractsb y hatemonger Eustace MuUins. Internet XVII. The Internet is a potent new additiont o the anti-government extremists' arsenal. This worldwide computer network is a very useful tool for pumping out propaganda, facilitating rapid, confidentialcommunicatio namon g members and sympathizers while creating a "virtu­ al" communityo flike-minde d believers scattered around the country. Militias, "common law court" groups and their supporters run dozens ofsite s on the World Wide Web. Some militia or militia-oriented sites eagerly embrace racisman danti-Semitism . PoliticalActivit y XVIII. Some anti-government extremists have been tryingt o acquire a mainstream image and political influence. Theireffort s have been rewarded by several elected officials, who have conferred undue legitimacy upon the movement by expressing sympathy for the extremists' anti-government message, orb y participatingi n militia or Christian Identity-oriented forums. Introduction A new ADL survey oftoday' s anti-government choice ofthes e pseudo-jurists is to defy the extremists finds that armed militias, although legitimate institutions ofgovernment , especial­ fewer in number, continue to pose a significant ly their judicial and law enforcement arms, by threat ofviolenc e and disorder Rumorso f replacing them with a parallelstructur e of secretive, underground militiasabound , but, their own creation. Operating inbogu s courts, not surprisingly, supporting evidence is scant. they render unenforceable judgments regard­ What is clear is that movement leaders are ing disputes that the complainants have al­ advising activists to lie low,lear n to use weap­ ready lost or would likely have lost in a gen­ ons at a firearms course rather than at a militia uine courtroom. "Common law"activist s also gathering, and keep their anti-government issue phony legal documents includingproper ­ thoughts to themselves.
Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    To Shake Their Guns in the Tyrant's Face: Libertarian Political Violence and the Origins of the Militia Movement Robert H. Churchill http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=327258 The University of Michigan Press, 2009. introduction On April 29, 1994, twenty-eight men met in the woods of northern Michigan. Angered by the events at Ruby Ridge and Waco and alarmed by rumors of black helicopters and foreign soldiers hidden on American military bases, these men agreed to associate as the ‹rst brigade of the Northern Michigan Regional Militia. The militia was the brainchild of Norm Olson and Ray Southwell, the pastor and deacon of a small Bap- tist church near Alanson, Michigan. Those assembled elected Olson as their commander. He in turn laid down some basic principles under which they would proceed. First, the militia would operate publicly. If they believed that the government was a threat to their liberty, then it was their duty, as patriots and as men, to “shake their guns in the tyrant’s face.”Second, the militia would be open to men and women of principle regardless of race or faith. Olson believed that the government was ut- terly corrupt, but unlike other voices on the far right, he argued that the source of that corruption lay in the human heart and not in any Jewish conspiracy or in the loss of racial purity. Finally, Olson portrayed the militia as an expression of popular sov- ereignty, a reincarnation of the Minutemen who had faced off against the king’s troops at Lexington and Concord.
    [Show full text]
  • Jones (Stephen) Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 – 2003 (Bulk 1995 – 1997)
    JONES (STEPHEN) OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING ARCHIVE, 1798 ± 2003 (BULK 1995 ± 1997). See TARO record at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/taro/utcah/03493/cah-03493.html (Approximately 620 linear feet) This collection is open for research use. Portions are restricted due to privacy concerns. See Archivist's Note for more details. Use of DAT and Beta tapes by appointment only; please contact repository for more information. This collection is stored remotely. Advance notice required for retrieval. Contact repository for retrieval. Cite as: Stephen Jones Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 ± 2003 (Bulk 1995 ± 1997), Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin. [AR 98-395; 2003-055; 2005-161] ______________________________________________________________________________ BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Stephen Jones (born 1940) was appointed in May 1995 by the United States District Court in Oklahoma City to serve as the lead defense attorney for Timothy McVeigh in the criminal court case of United States of America v. Timothy James McVeigh and Terry Lynn Nichols. On April 19, 1995, two years to the day after the infamous Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms raid on the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, a homemade bomb delivered inside of a Ryder rental truck was detonated in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Timothy McVeigh, as well as his accomplice Terry Nichols, were accused of and, in 1997, found guilty of the crime, and McVeigh was executed in 2001. Terry Nichols is still serving his sentence of 161 consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole in the ADX Florence super maximum-security prison in Florence, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Montana Freemen
    Every Man a King: The Rise and Fall of the Montana Freemen Last Modified May 6, 1996. Copyright May 1996 by Mark Pitcavage. No duplication or commercial use of this document may be made without the express consent of the author. Introduction: In terms of America's ongoing struggle against antigovernment extremists, only the Oklahoma City bombing of April 19, 1995 has surpassed the saga of the militants of "Justus Township" in remote eastern Montana in terms of media coverage. In terms of actual importance, what the Montana Freemen have done--and what similar groups across the country continue to do--may well eclipse a solitary act of terrorism by a few angry individuals. For the Montana Freemen have been waging a quiet war against the rest of the nation for several years now, a war fought with computers and comptrollers' warrants, liens and legal briefs. For the first time, here is their complete story. Every Man a King: The Rise and Fall of the Montana Freemen "Every man a king, every man a king, you can be a millionaire." So went the catchy campaign tune for Louisiana Senator Huey Long. Long, in the troubling economic times of the 1930s, won a following with his "Share the Wealth" plan, in which he proposed to alleviate people's suffering by using the power of the federal government to redistribute the nation's wealth. Now, in the troubling economic times of the 1990s, a new group of people have arisen to give a new, contemporary meaning to Long's famous song. People can become kings--or "sovereign citizens"--not by embracing the federal government but by rejecting it, along with most other forms of authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Militia Movement and Second Amendment Revolution: Conjuring with the People
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1996 The Militia Movement and Second Amendment Revolution: Conjuring with the People David C. Williams Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Second Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Williams, David C., "The Militia Movement and Second Amendment Revolution: Conjuring with the People" (1996). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 633. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/633 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MILITIA MOVEMENT AND SECOND AMENDMENT REVOLUTION: CONJURING WITH THE PEOPLE David C. Williams4 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 879 I. WHAT THE MILITIA HAS RIGHT-ARMED REVOLUTION .... 886 A. Fear of the Government ............................ 887 B. The Revolutionary Second Amendment ............. 892 C. The Importance of the Militia ...................... 896 D. The Danger of Disarmament ....................... 901 II. WHAT THE MILITIA HAS WRONG--THE BODY OF THE PEOPLE ................................................. 904 A. The Framers' View of the People
    [Show full text]
  • WAR in the WEST the Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right
    WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right A Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama JULY 2014 southern poverty law center WAR IN THE WEST The Bundy Ranch Standoff and the American Radical Right THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist antigovernment activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok or Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center about the report Written by Ryan Lenz and Mark Potok Edited by Heidi Beirich Designed by Russell Estes, Shannon Anderson and Sunny Paulk Cover photos by Jim Urquhart/Reuters/Corbis and Ryan Lenz southern poverty law center table of contents Executive Summary 5 Guns of April: The Bundy Standoff 8 Backgrounding Bundy: The Movement 18 Land Use and the ‘Patriots’: A Timeline 22 southern poverty law center After the climbdown: Militiamen and other support- ers of Cliven Bundy head for the corral where govern- ment agents were holding the Nevadan’s cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet and U.S. Citizen Militias. Doctor of Philosophy
    INTERNET AND U.S. CITIZEN MILITIAS Stan C. Weeber, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2000 APPROVED: Daniel G. Rodeheaver, Major Professor James Williams, Minor Professor James Quinn, Committee Member Mahmoud Sadri, Committee Member Rudy Seward, Committee Member Dale Yeatts, Chair of the Department of Sociology David Hartman, Dean of the School of Community Service C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Weeber, Stan C., Internet and U.S. citizen militias. Doctor of Philosophy (Sociology), May, 2000, 108 pp., 17 tables, references, 115 titles. Smelser’s theory of collective behavior holds that people join radical social movements because they experience strain. Among the most serious strains are anxieties that relate to one’s social status and the roles that correspond to it. A social movement arises as a means of coping with these anxieties. Militia presence and activity on the Internet (especially Usenet) is a phenomenon that can be studied within the framework of Smelser’s theory. Militia watchers contend that those who join the militias have experienced the kinds of strain to which Smelser refers. A content analysis of Internet traffic of U.S. militias provides a test of the general thesis outlined above. By analyzing Internet sites it is possible to examine whether militiamen have experienced strain, and whether the strain, together with other factors, influence an individual’s decision to join the militia. This dissertation was the first sociological study of American militias on the Internet and the first in which militias from all regions of the country was studied.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Militia Phenomenon: a Psychological
    THE AMERICAN MILITIA PHENOMENON: A PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE OF MILITANT THEOCRACIES ____________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Political Science ____________ by © Theodore C. Allen 2009 Summer 2009 PUBLICATION RIGHTS No portion of this thesis may be reprinted or reproduced in any manner unacceptable to the usual copyright restrictions without the written permission of the author. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Publication Rights ...................................................................................................... iii Abstract....................................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER I. Introduction.............................................................................................. 1 II. Literature Review of the Modern Militia Phenomenon ........................... 11 Government Sources .................................................................... 11 Historical and Scholarly Works.................................................... 13 Popular Media .............................................................................. 18 III. The History of the Militia in America...................................................... 23 The Nexus Between Religion and Race ....................................... 28 Jefferson’s Wall of Separation ..................................................... 31 Revolution and the Church..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Militia Movement Robert H
    To Shake Their Guns in the Tyrant's Face: Libertarian Political Violence and the Origins of the Militia Movement Robert H. Churchill http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=327258 The University of Michigan Press, 2009. the origins of the militia movement: violence and memory on the suburban-rural frontier Sometimes change is sudden, and so dramatic that we can hardly believe our eyes. On November 9, 1989, I came home from teaching high school and turned on the television. I had followed the events in Eastern Europe closely that fall, but it still took me twenty minutes to fathom the live im- ages of young people dancing atop a concrete wall. I simply could not grasp what I was seeing. The newscasters reporting the fall of the Berlin Wall were themselves speechless. Sometimes change is imperceptible, until one day we are forced to confront a new state of affairs and realize that it has been twenty years in the making. I grew up in a variety of communities, urban, suburban, and rural. In one of those rural communities I once attended a Fourth of July celebration in a parking lot in the middle of town. It was a tailgate party attended by most of the town’s high school students, who stood in a small crowd drinking beer, in wholesale violation of the town’s open container laws and the state’s minimum age regulations. At the entrance to the parking lot, about ‹fty yards from the crowd, the town’s chief of police sat in his cruiser.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of a Public Identity For
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts PATRIOTS OR PARANOIDS? THE CREATION OF A PUBLIC IDENTITY FOR THE MODERN MILITIA MOVEMENT A Thesis in Speech Communication By Heather M. Norton Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2005 ii The thesis of Heather M. Norton was reviewed and approved* by the following: J. Michael Hogan Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Thomas W. Benson Professor of Speech Communication Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Rhetoric Stephen H. Browne Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences John D. McCarthy Professor of Sociology James P. Dillard Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Head, Department of Communication Arts and Sciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii ABSTRACT The Oklahoma City bombing brought the modern Militia Movement to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness. After uncovering accused bomber Timothy McVeigh’s anti-government sentiments and his connections to the Michigan Militia, the federal government and the news media rushed to investigate the dangers posed by this movement—a movement that criticized the government for allegedly seeking to disarm law-abiding Americans and to limit their constitutional rights. The struggle that ensued over the public identity of the militias is the focus of this study. The study investigates the public debate over the militias beginning with the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995, and ending in 1996, when the militias disappeared from the headlines. Focusing on the “portraits” of the militias produced by the movement’s own leaders, so-called “watchdog” groups, and the Clinton administration, it examines how a variety of advocates worked to shape public perceptions of the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Committed by Terrorist Groups: Theory, Research and Prevention
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Crimes Committed by Terrorist Groups: Theory, Research and Prevention Author(s): Mark S. Hamm Document No.: 211203 Date Received: September 2005 Award Number: 2003-DT-CX-0002 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Crimes Committed by Terrorist Groups: Theory, Research, and Prevention Award #2003 DT CX 0002 Mark S. Hamm Criminology Department Indiana State University Terre Haute, IN 47809 Final Final Report Submitted: June 1, 2005 This project was supported by Grant No. 2003-DT-CX-0002 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .............................................................. iv Executive Summary....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The FBI Under Fire
    T H E CQResearcherPUBLISHED BY CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC. The FBI Under Fire How serious are the bureau’s recent problems? or decades, the FBI has ruffled feathers as it sought to balance tough law enforcement with sensitivity toward civil liberties. But today’s bureau operates in a climate vastly altered from Fthe days when agents in J. Edgar Hoover’s virtually unchecked empire could burglarize homes and keep files on political opponents. With stepped-up scrutiny from I N Congress and the press, the modern FBI under Louis THIS ISSUE S Freeh has demonstrated new willingness to admit its THE ISSUES ........................... 315 I BACKGROUND ..................... 322 mistakes. Currently, the bureau is under fire for, among D CHRONOLOGY ..................... 323 other things, alleged misconduct in its famous forensics E CURRENT SITUATION ........... 327 lab and possible political favoritism toward the White AT ISSUE ................................ 329 House. The FBI’s defenders, nonetheless, say the agency’s OUTLOOK............................. 330 record-high budgets are needed more than ever to fight BIBLIOGRAPHY .................... 332 high-tech criminals in globalized drug-running, terrorism, THE NEXT STEP .................... 333 espionage and organized crime. CQ April 11, 1997 • Volume 7, No. 14 • Pages 313-336 Formerly Editorial Research Reports THE FBI UNDER FIRE T H E THE ISSUES OUTLOOK CQ Researcher April 11, 1997 • Does the FBI lab need FBI Ethics Volume 7, No. 13 315 major reforms? 330 FBI Director Louis J. • Can the FBI be trusted Freeh has added new EDITOR with expanded powers? ethics courses to FBI Sandra Stencel training and expanded MANAGING EDITOR the Office of Professional Thomas J. Colin BACKGROUND Responsibility ASSOCIATE EDITORS Flawed First Steps Sarah M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Militia Movement and American History
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier History Faculty Publications History 2004 Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History Darren Mulloy Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/hist_faculty Recommended Citation Mulloy, Darren, "Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History" (2004). History Faculty Publications. 1. https://scholars.wlu.ca/hist_faculty/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of American Studies, 38 (2004), 3, 439–456 f 2004 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0021875804008734 Printed in the United Kingdom Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History DARREN MULLOY If one forgets the past, he will not be prepared for the future. The Militia of Montana YES! TODAY JUST AS YESTERDAY. The Michigan Militia When the militia movement emerged in the United States during the mid 1990s its members were widely seen as simply the latest practitioners of what Richard Hofstadter famously called ‘‘the paranoid style in American politics.’’1 There was much comfort to be had in this characterization. It fitted the militia movement into a long-standing model for understanding right-wing extremism in American life, one in which the principal characteristics of such extremism were readily understood: conspiratorial, Manichean, absolutist – if not apocalyptic – and, of course, paranoid. The problem with this ap- proach, though, is that it tends to discourage any examination of mainstream Darren Mulloy is Assistant Professor of US History at Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada.
    [Show full text]