RESEARCH ARTICLE Traditional scientific data vs. uncoordinated citizen science effort: A review of the current status and comparison of data on avifauna in Southern Brazil Louri Klemann-Junior1,2,3*, Marcelo Alejandro Villegas Vallejos4, Pedro Scherer-Neto5, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule2,3 a1111111111 1 Centro de Estudos Superiores de Itacoatiara, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil, 2 Programa de PoÂs-GraduacËão em Ecologia e ConservacËão, Setor de Ciências a1111111111 BioloÂgicas, Universidade Federal do ParanaÂ, Curitiba, ParanaÂ, Brazil, 3 LaboratoÂrio de Ecologia e a1111111111 ConservacËão, Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Setor de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do a1111111111 ParanaÂ, Curitiba, ParanaÂ, Brazil, 4 Autonomous Environmental Analyst, Curitiba, ParanaÂ, Brazil, 5 Museu de a1111111111 HistoÂria Natural ªCapão da Imbuiaº, Rua Benedito ConceicËão 407, Curitiba, ParanaÂ, Brazil *
[email protected] OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Klemann-Junior L, Villegas Vallejos MA, Scherer-Neto P, Vitule JRS (2017) Traditional Data generated by citizen science is particularly valuable in ecological research. If used dis- scientific data vs. uncoordinated citizen science cerningly with data from traditional scientific references, citizen science can directly contrib- effort: A review of the current status and ute to biogeography knowledge and conservation policies by increasing the number of comparison of data on avifauna in Southern Brazil. species records in large geographic areas. Considering the current level of knowledge on PLoS ONE 12(12): e0188819. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0188819 south Brazilian avifauna, the large volume of data produced by uncoordinated citizen sci- ence effort (CS), and the growing need for information on changes in abundance and spe- Editor: Robert Guralnick, University of Colorado, UNITED STATES cies composition, we have compiled an updated, general list of bird species occurrence within the state of ParanaÂ.