DOCSLIB.ORG

Our Future in Place the Report on Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Our Future in Place the Report on Consultation THE FARRELL REVIEW of Architecture + the Built Environment OUR FUTURE IN PLACE THE REPORT ON CONSULTATION BY THE FARRELL REVIEW TEAM Contents P.2 INTRODUCTION P.5 TERMS OF REFERENCE P.6 1. EDUCATION, OUTREACH AND SKILLS P.36 2. DESIGN QUALITY P.66 3. CULTURAL HERITAGE P.83 4. ECONOMIC BENEFITS P.113 5. BUILT ENVIRONMENT POLICY P.120 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE FARRELL REVIEW THE REPORT ON CONSULTATION 1 Introduction This Review has engaged widely from the start. In that respect it set itself apart from many other government reviews and has been independent in both its methods and its means. Over the last year, the team has reached out and consulted with thousands of individuals, groups and institutions. They have been from private, public and voluntary sectors, and from every discipline and practice relating to the built environment: architecture, planning, landscape architecture, engineering, ecology, developers, agents, policymakers, local government and politicians. “We are the editors and curators in the terms of reference that were issued by the of many voices.” Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) Sir Terry Farrell CBE (see page 5). Over 200 responses were received from individuals, companies, groups and This Report on the consultation process by institutions, with many organising questionnaires the Review team, led by Max Farrell and co- for members representing over 370,000 people. ordinated by Charlie Peel, is a structured narrative of the key themes of the Review, told Third were a series of workshops hosted through the many voices of its respondents and around the country. Each of these workshops participants. Most of what follows is primary consisted of 6 to 26 highly experienced and evidence that was gathered in the consultation senior professionals giving three hours to process. This is also backed up where actively engage with and contribute to the appropriate by existing research, and reference Review. The format involved having a broad is made to the sources. The aim here is to fairly but structured discussion around key topics that reflect the wide range of opinions that were were circulated in advance of the workshop. This sought, picking up on the key trends and the opened up the conversation and breadth of the most important issues felt by many. Review to table all the issues. The second half of each workshop was then spent closing down Embedded in this Report are conclusions and the debate into tangible “recommendations” and recommendations proposed by the Farrell ensuring everybody had a voice to table the key Review, set in the context from which they issues as they saw them. originated. Hence, this Report forms the evidence base from which the recommendations were Thirteen workshops were held in total. Four of drawn – further shaped by Terry Farrell’s 50 the themed workshops, which all took place years of experience in the design and planning in London, were based around the terms of of the built environment as set out in the reference: Education, Outreach & Skills; Design Introduction. Quality; Cultural Heritage; and Economic Benefits. Three further themed workshops were The consultation has taken four broad forms. on Urban Design & Landscape Architecture, The first of these was an independent, expert to bring together the holistic thinking of advisory panel that met in full four times during placemaking; Sustainability, an ever more the Review, with many smaller, focused panel pressing topic that cuts across all of the themes; sessions and individual meetings with them to and Architectural Policy, to examine formal shape the direction of travel and later to refine policies adopted in EU countries. the key messages. The panel of 11 experts from the built environment sector have given both Also held in London were two workshops breadth and years of experience to a holistic that addressed specific groups of key figures. Review of the built environment. The first of these, the Property Developers Workshop, provided the opportunity to learn Second was a public Call for Evidence, an online from the country’s leading developers how the set of questions based around the four themes market could adapt to improve outcomes. The THE FARRELL REVIEW THE REPORT ON CONSULTATION | INTRODUCTION 2 second, the Government Officials Workshop, In addition, the Review team travelled to assembled senior-level representatives from four cities for a series of regional workshops: the majority of government departments Birmingham, Bristol, Manchester and Newcastle. and executive agencies involved in the built All of this was made possible with the help of environment: the Cabinet Office; the Home partner organisations such as the architecture Office; DCMS; the Department for Education centres that hosted the events, as well as the (Educational Funding Agency); the Department contributions of all those who took part. for Business, Innovation & Skills; the Department for Communities & Local Government (DCLG); the Ministry of Justice; the London Legacy Development Corporation; and the Homes & Communities Agency. The workshops The attendees included: were attended by 192individuals including the 40architectural practices, 16university departments chairs and panel members. represented by principal in architecture, planning, or senior architects sociology and economics 10architecture centres 9conservation and retrofit specialists 12 landscape and urban 5housing associations design practices and house builders 26developers and 11institutes and regeneration specialists professional bodies 24representatives from 16 10individuals from think government departments tanks and policy groups and advisory bodies As well as transport planners, chartered surveyors, contractors, engineers, project managers, planning consultants. THE FARRELL REVIEW THE REPORT ON CONSULTATION | INTRODUCTION 3 The Review team also organised a Linking conversations were also echoed in the main Up the Reviews meeting that was attended subjects that came out of the workshops and by leaders of all the significant ongoing Call for Evidence. However, often insight was government-commissioned reviews, including gained that has been instrumental in shaping Lord Matthew Taylor of the DCLG Planning this Review. The full list of all the individuals Practice Guidance Review, Andy von Bradsky of and organisations consulted can be found at the Housing Standards Review Challenge Panel, the end of this document. and Peter Hansford of Construction 2025, the Construction Industry Strategy. The themed chapters that follow are both a documentation and a narrative of this Lastly, Terry Farrell personally wrote to and met consultation, and describe the context around with around 100 industry leaders, asking their the Conclusions and Recommendations views and opinions about the big issues facing proposed in this Review. the built environment today. These informative The following thematic workshops were held: The 5 chapters of the Report: Education, Outreach & Skills Workshop EDUCATION, hosted by University College London (UCL) OUTREACH & SKILLS Design Quality Workshop hosted by New London Architecture (NLA) 1.A. Children’s Education B. Outreach and Skills Cultural Heritage Workshop hosted by C. Professional Education Alan Baxter & Associates DESIGN Economic Benefits Workshop hosted by QUALITY London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) 2.A. Planning for the Future Urban Design & Landscape Architecture B. Making the Ordinary Workshop hosted by Capita Symonds Better Sustainability Workshop hosted by Farrells ECONOMIC Architectural Policy Workshop hosted BENEFITS by Farrells Property Developers Workshop hosted 4.A. Global Opportunities by DCMS B. The UK’s Potential Government Officials Workshop hosted by DCMS CULTURAL HERITAGE The following regional workshops were held: Birmingham Workshop hosted by MADE 3.A. It’s Not “Either/Or” Any More B. Future Heritage Bristol Workshop hosted by The Architecture Centre, Bristol BUILT Manchester Workshop hosted by ENVIRONMENT POLICY Bruntwood and supported by URBED Newcastle Workshop hosted by 5.A. The Role of Government Northern Architecture B. Policies within Government THE FARRELL REVIEW THE REPORT ON CONSULTATION | INTRODUCTION 4 Terms of Reference Sir Terry Farrell CBE is to conduct an independent review of architecture and the wider built environment and make recommendations to the Minister for Culture, Communications and Creative Industries, to inform DCMS’s approach to its role within government of promoting high standards of design. The intention of the review is to engage the sector in helping DCMS to develop its thinking about the role for government in the achievement of high-quality design, so that DCMS can continue to influence and shape policy across government, not least because the public sector is a major funder of buildings.” Terms of Reference for the Farrell Review of Architecture and the Built Environment Created in consultation with the Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) under Ed Vaizey MP. The review will examine the following areas: Promoting education, outreach and skills Cultural heritage and the built environment The review will consider the potential contribution The review will look at whether the desire to of built environment education to a broad and preserve the “old” makes it more difficult to balanced education both as a cultural subject in its encourage good new architecture, and the value own right and as a way of teaching other subjects. of our historic built environment as a cultural asset
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 400306 Ki0eso38uvhuvcwtb
    FOREWORD 10x10 brings together 100 of 10x10 was founded in one of the the world’s best architects and world’s great financial centres; the artists into the most famous city City of London. Its aim is to raise in the world, the City of London, money for essential projects in to draw at their own expense for developing countries. Article 25. The City is one square It began as a celebration of mile and every corner contains three things: firstly, the process two thousand years of great of looking at the city; stopping, architecture. From Wren to Foster, listening and putting pen to from Soane to Koolhaas the City paper. Secondly, the process of has exquisite buildings and spaces making choices; deciding what which have, in turn been captured to draw - picking favourites – and by today’s best talent. articulating those choices. Thirdly Article 25 thanks the participants it is a celebration both of the of 10x10 for their generosity and individual and the collective - a now asks you to match their spirit many-layered ‘snapshot’ of the by digging deep and bidding high. City. Here’s your chance to secure a Thanks go to all those who have piece of history, for a very good contributed; with drawings, with cause. Article 25 is the UK’s their time and with sponsorship. leading architectural humanitarian We hope that this will be the first charity - we need your support. of many 10x10’s, both in London and in other cities around the World. Jack Pringle Tim Makower Chair of Article 25 Allies and Morrison LONDON 10 X 10 “10x10 London – Drawing the City” DRAWING THE CITY is a unique project, dividing the City of London into a 10x10 grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomsbury Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Strategy
    Bloomsbury Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Strategy Adopted 18 April 2011 i) CONTENTS PART 1: CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 0 Purpose of the Appraisal ............................................................................................................ 2 Designation................................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................ 4 3.0 SUMMARY OF SPECIAL INTEREST........................................................................................ 5 Context and Evolution................................................................................................................ 5 Spatial Character and Views ...................................................................................................... 6 Building Typology and Form....................................................................................................... 8 Prevalent and Traditional Building Materials ............................................................................ 10 Characteristic Details................................................................................................................ 10 Landscape and Public Realm..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JUN 06 199 O
    RESIDENTIAL FABRIC AS MEMORABLE CITY FORM: A Study of West London and Bath by Pradeep Ramesh Dalal Dip. Arch., School of Architecture, CEPT. Ahmedabad, India June, 1987 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE, 1991 @Pradeep Ramesh Dalal 1991. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of the Author Pradeep Dalal, Department of Architecture 10 May, 1991 Certified by ulian Beinart Professor of Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Julian Beinart Committee on Graduate Studies MASSACH.USETTS INSTR TE Chairman, Departmental OF TECHNOLOGY JUN 06 199 o Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITLibraries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://libraries.mit.edu/docs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you. Both the Library and Archives versions of this thesis (Dalal, Pradeep;1991) contain grayscale images only. This is the best available copy. RESIDENTIAL FABRIC AS MEMORABLE CITY FORM: A Study of West London and Bath by Pradeep Ramesh Dalal Submitted to the Department of Architecture on May 15, 1991 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • TOP Trade100 and Professional Bodies, Managing Agents,CALL Building PMR 0845 Owners, 094 Investors, 0600 Developers, Valuers, and PMR SOURCE Lawyers Among Others
    Sponsored by: In this special feature, we identify the most influential peopleWORKING in the residential WITH leasehold THE property sector. Included within the list is a mix of leasehold campaigners, Parliamentarians,TOP trade100 and professional bodies, managing agents,CALL building PMR 0845 owners, 094 investors, 0600 developers, valuers, and PMR SOURCE lawyers among others. Let us know if we missed anyone out MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS. by emailing [email protected] OUR SUCCESS IS BUILT ON OFFERING THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF SERVICE AND EXPERTISE, COMPETITIVE RATE. DELIVERED AT THE MOST WORKING WITH THE TOP 100 CALL PMR 0845 094 0600 PMRPMR Suite 340, SOUR50 Eastcastle Street,C London,E W1W 8EA 24MAN hour tAelGE: 084M5ENT 094 06 P0R0OFEEmailS: [email protected] WOUReb: ww SUwC.fpmCESr.Sco IS.u kBUILT ON OFFERING THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF SERVICE AND EXPERTISE, COMPETITIVE RATE. DELIVERED AT THE MOST PMR Suite 340, 50 Eastcastle Street, London, W1W 8EA 24 hour tel: 0845 094 0600 Email: [email protected] Web: www.fpmr.co.uk www.newsontheblock.com ISSUE 79 17 Sponsored by: WORKING WITH THE TOP 100 CALL PMR 0845 094 0600 PMR SOURCE MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS. OUR SUCCESS IS BUILT ON OFFERING THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF SERVICE AND EXPERTISE, COMPETITIVE RATE. DELIVERED AT THE MOST Entries have been gathered subjectively PMR Suite 340, 50 Eastcastle Street, London, W1W 8EA 24 hour tel: 0845 094 0600 Email: [email protected] accordingWeb: www.fpmr.co.uk to our knowledge and experience of the industry and are arranged in alphabetical order by name. James Agar manage over £1 billion of Enfranchisement.
    [Show full text]
  • PHASE3 Architecture and Design
    [email protected] 17 May 2017 BUILDINGS PLACES CITIES [email protected] 17 May 2017 LONDON: DESIGN CAPITAL BUILDINGS / PLACES / CITIES This NLA Insight Study was published by New London Architecture (NLA) in May 2017. It accompanies the NLA exhibition London: Design Capital on display from May–July 2017 and is part of the NLA International Dialogues year-round programme, supporting the exchange of ideas and information across key global markets. New London Architecture (NLA) The Building Centre 26 Store Street London WC1E 7BT Programme Champions www.newlondonarchitecture.org #LDNDesignCapital © New London Architecture (NLA) Programme Supporter ISBN 978-0-9956144-2-0 [email protected] 17 May 2017 2 Contents Forewords 4 Chapter one: London’s global position 6 Chapter two: London’s global solutions 18 Chapter three: London’s global challenges and opportunities 26 Chapter four: London’s global future 32 Project showcase 39 Practice directory 209 Programme champions and supporters 234 References and further reading 239 © Jason Hawkes – jasonhawkes.com [email protected] 17 May 2017 4 5 Creative Capital Global Business As a London based practice with offces based on three continents and London is the world’s global capital for creative design and construction a team of highly creative architects currently engaged in design and skills. Just as the City of London became the fnancial capital of the world, development opportunities around the globe, I welcome the NLA’s latest so London has beneftted from its history, its location, its legal and education insight study and exhibition London: Design Capital for two reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Giles Worsley, 'The “Best Turned” House of the Duke of Bedford', the Georgian Group Jounal, Vol. VI, 1996, Pp. 63–73
    Giles Worsley, ‘The “Best Turned” House of The Duke of Bedford’, The Georgian Group Jounal, Vol. VI, 1996, pp. 63–73 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 1996 THE ‘BEST TURNED’ HOUSE OF THE DUKE OF BEDFORD Giles Worsley outhampton or Bedford House, as it later came to be known, was one of London’s great aristocratic houses, but it has largely been ignored by architectural historians, perhaps because it was demolished as long ago as 1800. Few accounts of mid-17th-century British Sarchitecture refer to it more than tangentially, and those that do assume that it was built after the Restoration.1 Careful examination of the documentary sources, however, shows that Southampton House was begun between 1638 and 1640 and built, although probably not fitted out, before the Civil War. This makes it one of the most substantial new houses to be built in England during the reign of Charles I and raises intriguing questions of authorship, for the sophistication of the design compares well with the works of Inigo Jones and John Webb.2 The house stood on what was then the northern edge of London, in the parish of St Giles- in-the-Fields, to the north west of Lincoln’s Inn Fields. It was a detached hotel particulier with rustic, piano nobile and attic storeys, hipped roof and dormers. Sir Roger Pratt noted that the whole building was of brick.3 Its south front, facing a forecourt and (from the 1660s) Bloomsbury Fig. 1. John Dunstall, Southampton House from the south, before 1693. British Library. 63 Square beyond, was eleven bays wide, the central seven bays slightly projecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal – Vertical, Defining the Ground
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Horizontal – Vertical, Defining the Ground Author: Michel Mossessian, Design Principal, Mossessian & Partners Subjects: History, Theory & Criticism Social Issues Urban Design Keywords: Planning Urban Sprawl Vertical Urbanism Publication Date: 2015 Original Publication: The Middle East: A Selection of Written Works on Iconic Towers and Global Place-Making Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Michel Mossessian Horizontal – Vertical, Defining the Ground Michel Mossessian, Design Principal, Mossessian & Partners Why is it that cultural and educational The initial question, which has provoked skyscraper. But is this good enough? It might buildings that deal with creativity and investigation into the questions set out above, be economically simpler, but is it sustainable innovation are horizontal, whilst those dealing arose during a MIPIM (the major annual in terms of creating a happy city, a city that with land value are vertical? And how can we real estate event for property professionals) works and retains its population? inject creativity and culture into tall buildings, debate where, on the Sustainable Cities panel, two high-rise tycoons were advocating height Cities only work where culture comes which they need, in order to be sustainable, as the only viable solution to growth and a before commerce. First and foremost is given that land space is at a premium, both sustainable future. the wellbeing of the citizens. Once you in terms of cost and availability? Education have that, you have a thriving, bustling city. and the embracing of local cultural context We understand, from our observations of New York and Venice are the exemplars of are key factors in city building.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Statement: 33 - 37 Bedford Square
    Conservation Statement: 33 - 37 Bedford Square Bernadette Bone June 2011 Conservation Statement: 33-37 Bedford Square 1 Contents 1. Summary and Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Understanding the Site ................................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Assessment of Significance .......................................................................................................................................... 11 4. Issues / Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 5. Outline Policies ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................................................... 23 A Bibliography .................................................................................................................................................................. B Listing Notices ............................................................................................................................................................... C List
    [Show full text]
  • Camden History Review & Chs Newsletter Index
    KEY to CAMDEN HISTORY REVIEW & CHS NEWSLETTER INDEX This index offers subject access to Camden History Society’s serial publications from 1970 to 2016 – viz. the annual Camden History Review, volumes 1 to 40; and the bimonthly CHS Newsletter, issues 1 to 278 Please note that all references to a subject, however brief, are included on this index. Articles devoted wholly or substantially to a subject are indicated by the symbol Scope Necessarily selective, this index is intended to assist those researching aspects of Camden’s local history. Excluded, therefore, are subjects mentioned in CHS publications but lacking any direct association with the Camden area. Included in the index are: Streets, localities, buildings, organisations and institutions located within, or immediately adjacent to, the London Borough of Camden, or the former Metropolitan Boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Pancras; People having a direct connection with Camden, whether through residence or work; as visitors, performers at local venues, landlords, or architects of local buildings; or as grave occupants; Generic topics (e.g. theatres) treated within a Camden context. Newsletter notices and reviews of talks, walks, outings, exhibitions and books are indexed only where they include local historical detail of potential use to researchers. Items relating wholly to CHS domestic business are not indexed. Key main entry/entries Bold numerals, indicating * illustration included Camden History Review † map or plan volume number, are C* cover illustration followed by page number(s) BC back cover in normal type: IFC inside front cover e.g. 23 18, 20 = volume 23, n footnote pages 18 and 20.
    [Show full text]
  • NLA on Location Westminster: Creating Places for People Tuesday 19 November 2019, 12:00-19:00 Regent Street Cinema, Marylebone, London W1B 2HW
    @nlalondon #WestminsterOL NLA On Location Westminster: creating places for people Tuesday 19 November 2019, 12:00-19:00 Regent Street Cinema, Marylebone, London W1B 2HW Quadrant Arcade, Crown Estate © Philip Vile In association with: Sponsored by: CONFERENCE 12:00 PROGRAMME Registration and lunch 13:00 With 55,000 business enterprises providing Welcome from Chair 754,000 jobs and generating an annual economic Peter Murray, Curator in Chief, output of £55 billion, Westminster is the largest New London Architecture employment centre in the UK. Given that 85 per cent of businesses in the borough employ fewer 13:05 than 10 people, there is greater need for the built Welcome address from Council environment to reflect the different demands of a range of sectors. Deirdra Armsby, Director of Place Shaping and Town Planning, City of Westminster The current daytime population of 1 million in a borough of 248,000 residents and the resulting increased pressures on infrastructure, coupled with Session One: Curating Place changes in mobility patterns, necessitate change and futureproofing of transport systems and public realm. 13:20 Heritage and the Diversity of Place: In the face of environmental, social and economic One Heddon Street and Regent Street challenges, how is Westminster evolving? How James Cooksey, Director of Central will Westminster’s City Plan shape the borough? London, The Crown Estate In an increasingly competitive environment, how is Westminster evolving to nurture growth and 13:30 support a thriving economy while maintaining its
    [Show full text]
  • Prospectus 2 | Imperial College London
    Improving global healthcare through evidence-based innovation Prospectus 2 | Imperial College London DESIGNING AND DISTRIBUTING HIGH IMPACT GLOBAL HEALTHCARE INNOVATIONS TO REDUCE HEALTH INEQUALITIES WORLDWIDE CONTENTS 3 Overview 14 Our research centres 4 Our way of working 16 The Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery 6 Our structure 18 Centre for Health Policy 8 Our governance 22 Health Innovation Exchange (HELIX) Centre 9 Our global profile for Design in Healthcare 10 Global reach 24 Centre for Digestive and Gut Health 12 World Innovation Summit for Health 26 Centre for African Research and Engagement 27 Centre for International Child Health 28 The Imperial College Wellcome Trust Centre for Global Health Research 29 Degree programmes 34 Institute affiliates INSTITUTE LEADERSHIP Professor the Lord Ara Darzi of Denham Professor Beate Kampmann MD PhD FRCPCH OM KBE PC FRS FMedSci HonFREng FRCS FIOM Professor of Paediatric Infection & Immunity Director: Institute of Global Health Innovation Centre Director: Centre of International Child Health Centre Director: Centre for Health Policy, Hamlyn Centre Professor Majid Ezzati FMedSci for Robotic Surgery, HELIX Centre for Design in Healthcare Professor of Global Environmental Health Professor Guang-Zhong Yang Centre Director: The Imperial College Wellcome Trust FREng FIEEE FIET FAIMBE FCGI Centre for Global Health Research Deputy Director: Institute of Global Health Innovation Professor Kathryn Maitland Centre Director: Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery Professor of Tropical Paediatric Infectious
    [Show full text]