Global Property Insight

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Property Insight issue 2 autumn 2014 global property insight Chicago rises Rich pickings On the move The real estate market springs Wealthy investors look How Coca-Cola GB found the back to life with the first new to the commercial sector perfect headquarters in the buildings in eight years as returns boom heart of London’s West End ft.com/GPI contents Special reports editor michael Skapinker autumn 2014 Head of editorial content Hugo Greenhalgh Production editor George Kyriakos Art director Sheila Jack Picture editor michael crabtree Sub editor christina madden Global sales director Dominic Good Head of content activation Alexis Jarman Content activation manager mike Duffy Global associate director, commercial property Lyn thompson Advertising production 04 Daniel Lesar contributors Kate Allen is the ft’s property correspondent Jennifer Bissell is the ft’s US web editor Liz Bolshaw is a freelance journalist David Crouch is a freelance journalist based in Gothenburg Edwin Heathcote is the ft’s architecture correspondent Brenda Hofmann is director of procurement at coca-cola Ben McLannahan is the ft’s tokyo correspondent Michel Mossessian is design S principal at mossessian & Partners Neil Munshi is the ft’s chicago reuTer and midwest correspondent y; Chris Newlands is editor of ftfm, bibb the ft fund management section Adam Palin is a reporter for cHarlie x; ft money knO Gill Plimmer is an ft reporter alan Daniel Ringelstein is a director at ; Skidmore, owings & merrill Time Sarah Townsend is publications editor at the Architects’ Journal DreamS 1. S: TO PHO ft.com/GPI 3. investors 18 column chris Newlands looks at a 4. 2. landscape littered with ‘ghost towns’ and asks whether china’s 1. stalled housing boom threatens Deco delight the global economy the merchandise mart in openers 38 chicago – see page 50 20 second-tier cities 2. 06 outlet villages forget Hong Kong, London, Paris Towers of strength breaking ground out-of-town designer discount – the smart money is on Nanjing, the more London As an antidote to the zoned centres have revolutionised retail, Brussels and manchester for development – see page 8 ghettos of modern commerce, offering luxury for less and productivity and ‘liveability’ Edwin Heathcote admires the good-looking returns for investors 3. 05 estate of play historic mixed-use courtyard developers mark Preston of the buildings of central Europe 24 Grosvenor Estate – see the super-rich 42 page 44 08 the world’s millionaires are pouring column 4. introduction unprecedented amounts into Europe’s listed property market is bags of style from the chiltern firehouse to bricks and mortar, snapping up fragmented, and should consolidate Why retail outlets are in Washington’s Post office, grand iconic properties in prime locations for growth, says Kate Allen vogue – see page 20 industrial buildings are being salvaged from dereliction and 28 44 transformed back into landmarks statistics interview the indispensable data showing mark Preston describes his role 12 the focal points for real estate with the Grosvenor Estate and feature activity across Africa the fine balance between historic Scandinavia’s commercial assets and overseas growth property scene is booming as occupiers foreign investors flood in to take 50 advantage of its strong economic 30 chicago and population growth on the move New skyscrapers, massive Brenda Hofmann describes the downtown refurbishment – there’s fizz and excitement of finding the a real wind in the city’s sales perfect West End offices for her company, coca-cola 54 design 32 Breaking down the office cubicle japan is crucial for workplace success Gabriel Baertschi’s search for new premises that would make topping out his AstraZeneca staff connect 58 michel mossessian High-rise versus groundscrapers ft.com/GPI breaking ground edwin heathcote People love to live and work in lively places. It is a cliché. Experts in urban block capitals studies, from Jane Jacobs to Jan Gehl and Richard Sennett, suggest that cities work because people of all classes are obliged to rub up against one another. They find interest in a streetscape that is alive around the clock and in which the mix of uses maintains an active urban realm. Yet despite this simple idea that sounds rather obvious, cities are no longer being built this way. Developers like to build housing in self-contained plots, whether those are suburban tracts or condo towers; they like the control that solely residential use gives them and generally will not include commercial units unless zoning regulations demand it. Commercial developers, too, like the unencumbered purity of a central business district. They feel strength in numbers, they like their office towers to huddle together with their own kind. Even those cities most famed for their streetlife, for animated landscapes envied across the world – New York, Barcelona, Paris – are making the same mistakes with their new commercial developments. The conventional reasons given are to do with the differing sizes of floor plates needed for commercial, retail and residential use; the desire for global businesses to be together; and zoning regulations. The actual reasons include the developers’ desire to be rid of troublesome residents who tend to object to further construction – see the once densely mixed City of London and its rejection of residential developments, which has turned the historic capital of London into a place purely for capital. Yet there is another, rather neglected model that formerly worked very well. You can see it on the streets of most big central European cities, from Berlin to Budapest, Krakow to Kiev. It also involves a kind of zoning, but not in the same ways that tend to be seen in the Anglo- Saxon model. This is not zoning of the plan, but zoning of the section: you could think of it as a multi-layered torte. In practice, this meant big courtyard buildings, spec-built by individual developers and builders. They were 1. generally five to seven storeys tall (heights were carefully restricted by flats are roughly renovated as demand a civilised new prototype for the city in planning edicts) and had a courtyard at for more space becomes apparent. So which the division of the functions was their centre. The layering often began successful have these been at saving inscribed into the façade. The ground with a half-basement. This was the realm old buildings that they have effectively floor was glazed but with substantial of workshops and craftsmen, allowing gentrified the once end-of-life structures structural stanchions that gave depth light industry and artisanal skill to exist they intended to inhabit temporarily; and interest to the streetscape and in the heart of the city. The ground floor whole blocks are being brought back versatility to the display. to the street-front was occupied by retail. into use rather than demolished. Here, the first floor too was glazed, This might spread into the courtyard, In the dawn of modern architecture, but to a different rhythm. In Lajta’s with every inch of wall space occupied new interpretations of these blocks Budapest building (along with others by window displays or by vitrines as emerged as potential archetypes of he designed in the city around the you entered via a covered passage. the contemporary city. max fabiani’s same time) the commercial floors The ground floor of the courtyard Artaria House in Vienna (1901), Adolf were expressed as almost fully glazed, itself might be plain residential or it Loos’ Goldman & Salatsch building, also open and transparent, letting natural might be inhabited by trades: the tailors, in Vienna, and Béla Lajta’s Rózsavölgyi light deep into the floor plate. The furriers, cobblers, watchmakers and so House in Budapest (both 1911) pointed to apartments above were characterised on, that made a city tick. by more wall and The first floor facing the street was 1. less window, the reserved for commerce, the lawyers’, Front of house more solid surface publishers’ and accountants’ offices Béla Lajta’s Rózsavölgyi signifying the more House in Budapest has and so on. These rooms might also be private realm, workshops, commercial used as apartments; their piano nobile spaces and apartments sheltered from the proportions had a grandeur that made noise of the city. It them suitable for dwellings or show 2. was an architecture 07 rooms. Above these were the flats. yardstick of success parlante, an ideal The classic courts The lower the floor number, the higher around which mixed urban form that the ceiling and the better the interiors; retail and residential has almost entirely service rooms looked out onto the life flourished faded away. courtyard. Poorer apartments were The problem located at the rear of the building and came with the the cheapest accommodation was at next generation of the top or in the mansard roof space. modernists who, Almost all of the apartments would in a way, disliked have been rented, the exceptions being the dense city that the buildings’ owners, developers or was exactly the investors. The social and economic crucible that had structure of the buildings was absolutely given their ideas clear, yet all classes lived and worked succour. Instead, together in a single structure. they desired air These blocks did have servants’ and light, glazed stairs and courtyard entrances, but towers standing in the important thing was that they green space. Their were genuinely mixed environments. utopian vision was y As densely populated buildings, they 2. suburban rather BiBB worked hard; they became engines of than urban; it led economic activity. They have also proved to business parks cHarlie S; to be remarkably resilient. Now many of These were densely populated rather than vital these city centre blocks have seen their city centres and had its ultimate cHiVe ar apartments converted into small offices blocks, engines of economic triumph in the zoned ghettos of al for architects and IT companies, start-ups modern commerce.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Banking and Capital Markets Outlook Reimagining Transformation 2 Brochure / Report Title Goes Here | Section Title Goes Here
    2019 Banking and Capital Markets Outlook Reimagining transformation 2 Brochure / report title goes here | Section title goes here Table of contents Calmer waters: A decade after the financial crisis, the banking industry is on firmer ground 1 Regulation: A new era of global regulatory divergence 5 Technology: Creating a symphonic enterprise 8 Risk: Strengthening the core with new-age defenses 11 Retail banking: The digital leadership race 13 Corporate banking: Digitization and a new credit discipline 16 Transaction banking: Modernizing operations with a focus 18 on improving the client experience Investment banking: New client engagement models 19 and ecosystem orchestration Payments: The imperative to diversify growth, 22 bolster security, and restructure the organization Wealth management: Balancing business growth 24 with product rationalization and transparency Market infrastructure: Harnessing the power of data 26 and technologies to drive a competitive growth agenda 02 Calmer waters A decade after the financial crisis, the banking industry is on firmer ground The global banking system is not only bigger and more Total assets in the United States reached a peak of profitable but also more resilient than at any time in $17.5 trillion.2 Capital levels are up as well, with average tier 1 the last 10 years (figure 1). According to The Banker’s capital ratio standing at 13.14 percent. Return on equity Top 1000 World Banks Ranking for 2018, total assets (ROE) for the industry is at a post-crisis high of 11.83 percent.3 reached$124 trillion, while return on assets (ROA) stood at Efficiency ratios also are at their best.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Innovation and the Inequality Gap
    Financial Innovation and the Inequality Gap Roxana Mihet ∗ Latest version here November 26, 2020 Abstract Information-based models of capital income inequality that link return hetero- geneity to investor sophistication levels need to assume an increase in data costs over time to generate widening inequality. Empirically, this assumption contra- dicts evidence that investment markets have become more informative over time, and theoretically, it also overlooks the possibility that poorer investors can avoid paying a large fixed cost for research, simply by buying shares in a fund. In this paper, I study the impact of financial innovation on capital income inequality in a theoretical framework where investors, heterogeneous in their sophistication, have a costly choice between not investing, investing through a fund of average quality, and searching for an informed fund. The model predicts that while financial inno- vation can make the investment sector more efficient and boost financial inclusion, some financial innovation also brings risks. For example, when the cost of financial data processing falls, more investors trade on information. This makes participa- tion less valuable for the uninformed marginal stock market participant, who is a poorer investor in some average fund and who exits the market altogether, fore- going the equity premium. The decrease in the participation of relatively poorer investors amplifies inequality. Empirically, this negative force has been very strong in the last 20 years and it can explain why, in spite of a dramatic reduction in data processing costs and fund fees, the US stock market has become less inclusive and more unequal and the participation rate has declined.
    [Show full text]
  • 400306 Ki0eso38uvhuvcwtb
    FOREWORD 10x10 brings together 100 of 10x10 was founded in one of the the world’s best architects and world’s great financial centres; the artists into the most famous city City of London. Its aim is to raise in the world, the City of London, money for essential projects in to draw at their own expense for developing countries. Article 25. The City is one square It began as a celebration of mile and every corner contains three things: firstly, the process two thousand years of great of looking at the city; stopping, architecture. From Wren to Foster, listening and putting pen to from Soane to Koolhaas the City paper. Secondly, the process of has exquisite buildings and spaces making choices; deciding what which have, in turn been captured to draw - picking favourites – and by today’s best talent. articulating those choices. Thirdly Article 25 thanks the participants it is a celebration both of the of 10x10 for their generosity and individual and the collective - a now asks you to match their spirit many-layered ‘snapshot’ of the by digging deep and bidding high. City. Here’s your chance to secure a Thanks go to all those who have piece of history, for a very good contributed; with drawings, with cause. Article 25 is the UK’s their time and with sponsorship. leading architectural humanitarian We hope that this will be the first charity - we need your support. of many 10x10’s, both in London and in other cities around the World. Jack Pringle Tim Makower Chair of Article 25 Allies and Morrison LONDON 10 X 10 “10x10 London – Drawing the City” DRAWING THE CITY is a unique project, dividing the City of London into a 10x10 grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Technological Change and Financial Innovation in Banking: Some Implications for Fintech
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Frame, W. Scott; Wall, Larry D.; White, Lawrence J. Working Paper Technological change and financial innovation in banking: Some implications for fintech Working Paper, No. 2018-11 Provided in Cooperation with: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Suggested Citation: Frame, W. Scott; Wall, Larry D.; White, Lawrence J. (2018) : Technological change and financial innovation in banking: Some implications for fintech, Working Paper, No. 2018-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, http://dx.doi.org/10.29338/wp2018-11 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/200533 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of ATLANTA WORKING PAPER SERIES Technological Change and Financial Innovation in Banking: Some Implications for Fintech W.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Future in Place the Report on Consultation
    THE FARRELL REVIEW of Architecture + the Built Environment OUR FUTURE IN PLACE THE REPORT ON CONSULTATION BY THE FARRELL REVIEW TEAM Contents P.2 INTRODUCTION P.5 TERMS OF REFERENCE P.6 1. EDUCATION, OUTREACH AND SKILLS P.36 2. DESIGN QUALITY P.66 3. CULTURAL HERITAGE P.83 4. ECONOMIC BENEFITS P.113 5. BUILT ENVIRONMENT POLICY P.120 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE FARRELL REVIEW THE REPORT ON CONSULTATION 1 Introduction This Review has engaged widely from the start. In that respect it set itself apart from many other government reviews and has been independent in both its methods and its means. Over the last year, the team has reached out and consulted with thousands of individuals, groups and institutions. They have been from private, public and voluntary sectors, and from every discipline and practice relating to the built environment: architecture, planning, landscape architecture, engineering, ecology, developers, agents, policymakers, local government and politicians. “We are the editors and curators in the terms of reference that were issued by the of many voices.” Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) Sir Terry Farrell CBE (see page 5). Over 200 responses were received from individuals, companies, groups and This Report on the consultation process by institutions, with many organising questionnaires the Review team, led by Max Farrell and co- for members representing over 370,000 people. ordinated by Charlie Peel, is a structured narrative of the key themes of the Review, told Third were a series of workshops hosted through the many voices of its respondents and around the country. Each of these workshops participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Innovation in the 21St Century: Evidence from U.S
    Financial Innovation in the 21st Century: Evidence from U.S. Patenting1 Josh Lerner Amit Seru Nicholas Short Yuan Sun August 7, 2020 Patents provide a window into the evolution of financial innovation over the past two decades. We first highlight the growth and importance of these awards in the 21st century. The dramatic surge in financial patenting has been driven largely by information technology and other non-financial firms, while banks and other financial institutions have narrowed the scope of their innovations. These shifts have been an accompanied by a decline in the links between patent awards and academic knowledge, and shifts in the geographic location of innovation, especially within incumbent firms. 1 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]. All authors are affiliated with Harvard University except for Seru, who is at Stanford University. Lerner and Seru are affiliates of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Harvard Business School’s Division of Research and Doctoral Programs provided financial support for this project. We thank Howell Jackson, Adam Jaffe, Andy Toole, and seminar participants at Stanford Law School for helpful comments. Rick Townsend kindly allowed us to use the patent-venture capital mapping. Patrick Clapp, Amin Gulamali, Stephen Moon, Mahlon Reihman, Kathleen Ryan, Rhys Sevier, and James Zeitler provided excellent research assistance. Lerner has received compensation for consulting with financial institutions. All errors and omissions are our own. 1 1. Introduction The extent and consequences of innovation in the finance industry has been a subject of intense skepticism since the global financial crisis (GFC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Fintech in the Middle East an Analysis of the Emergence of Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates
    The Rise of FinTech in the Middle East An Analysis of the Emergence of Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates JACKSON MUELLER AND MICHAEL S. PIWOWAR ABOUT US ABOUT THE MILKEN INSTITUTE The Milken Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank. For the past three decades, the Milken Institute has served as a catalyst for practical, scalable solutions to global challenges by connecting human, financial, and educational resources to those who need them. Guided by a conviction that the best ideas, under-resourced, cannot succeed, we conduct research and analysis and convene top experts, innovators, and influencers from different backgrounds and competing viewpoints. We leverage this expertise and insight to construct programs and policy initiatives. These activities are designed to help people build meaningful lives, in which they can experience health and well-being, pursue effective education and gainful employment, and access the resources required to create ever- expanding opportunities for themselves and their broader communities. ABOUT THE CENTER FOR FINANCIAL MARKETS The Milken Institute Center for Financial Markets conducts research and constructs programs designed to facilitate the smooth and efficient operation of financial markets to help ensure that they are fair and available to those who need them when they need them. CONTENTS 3 Executive Summary 4 Introduction 4 Setting the Foundation for FinTech Development 5 Growing Domestic and Regional Customer Base 6 Positive Growth Trends and Established Payments Presence 9 The Emerging
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks Before the Fintech and the Future of Finance Conference, April
    Remarks By Thomas J. Curry Comptroller of the Currency At Fintech and the Future of Finance Conference Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University April 28, 2017 Evanston, Illinois Thank you for that introduction. It’s a pleasure to be in the Chicago area again to discuss financial innovation and, more specifically, the convergence of emerging financial technology and traditional financial services. It’s an exciting time to be in banking. All over the United States, and around the world, bankers and other entrepreneurs are figuring out how to adapt their businesses to the changes taking place in the financial services industry. Some banks are creating their own versions of financial technology innovations, while others are expanding their collaborative relationships with—or simply acquiring—companies that offer new technology or services that complement the banks’ existing business plans. In my short time with you today, I would like to share my perspective on where financial innovation is today, the potential I see for fintech to improve the lives of ordinary Americans and improve businesses’ bottom lines, and what the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is doing to encourage responsible innovation within the federal banking system. 1 First, I’d like to tell you a bit about the agency I’ve been privileged to lead for the last five years as Comptroller of the Currency. Financial professionals understand the agency’s role in administering the federal banking system, chartering and supervising national banks and federal savings associations, and, when necessary, taking enforcement actions against institutions and individuals for failures in compliance or safety and soundness.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Newsletter Issue IX — July 2021
    bank of america retirees Quarterly Newsletter Issue IX — July 2021 Company news 1. Bank of America reports Q2 2021 Bank of America Reports Q2 Net Income financial results of $9.2 Billion, EPS of $1.03 2. Financial and business highlights Delivering for our clients 3. Supporting small businesses across the country through the Paycheck Protection Program Bank of America’s industry leading high-tech and high-touch approach recognized by J.D. Power 4. Bank of America expands digital business-to- consumer payment offerings with Pay to Card Erica® is core to serving clients Delivering for our employees 5. An update on our return to the office plans for Financial Results Q2 2021 U.S. teammates On Wednesday, July 14, 2021, Bank of America reported net income of $9.2B or diluted earnings 6. Employee snapshots: Teammates around the world per share of $1.03 compared with $3.5B or $0.37 per diluted share in the year ago quarter. return to the office “We delivered solid earnings and returned more capital to shareholders during the quarter as we Bank of America increases U.S. minimum hourly moved to a more open economy. Our team continued to do a great job serving clients, as shown wage to $25 by 2025 by the increased levels of client activity across all of our businesses,” said Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan. Delivering for our communities “More than 85% of our buildings and offices are open, and we’re welcoming our teammates 7. Update on our $1.25 billion commitment to back.
    [Show full text]
  • Fintech in India: Present Status and Looming Issues
    FinTech in India: present status and looming issues Susan Thomas IGIDR, Bombay 31 October, 2019 Structure of this talk I What is FinTech I Governing framework: Information, Payments, Business models and the role of technology I The FinTech industry in India I Policy status, Looking forward What is FinTech Definition I Financial Stability Board (2017): “...technologically enabled financial innovation that could result in new business models, applications, processes, or products with an associated material effect on financial markets and institutions and the provision of financial services.” (Emphasis added) Same functions; New mechanisms of delivering finance. Classifying financial functions and delivery Traditional (FSB, 2017) – 1. payments, clearing and settlement 2. deposits, lending and capital raising 3. investment management and market support 4. insurance FinTech (Schindler, 2017) – 1. distributed ledger technology 2. machine learning and online marketplace lending, 3. equity crowdfunding 4. insurance FinTech 5. robo-advice Classifying financial functions and delivery Traditional (FSB, 2017) – 1. payments, clearing and settlement 2. deposits, lending and capital raising 3. investment management and market support 4. insurance FinTech (Schindler, 2017) – 1. distributed ledger technology 2. machine learning and online marketplace lending, 3. equity crowdfunding 4. insurance FinTech 5. robo-advice Key take-aways I Goals of FinTech: Higher financial inclusion; competition to existing financial firms. I How can competition make a material impact on existing financial firms? Through a focus on function vs. (institutional) form (Merton and Bodie, 2005) I FinTech is about new business models that disrupt existing business models by: I Identifying functions in finance and I Uses technology to deliver functions separately Key take-aways I Goals of FinTech: Higher financial inclusion; competition to existing financial firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Fintech and Disruptive Innovation in Financial Markets
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/WD(2019)55 Unclassified English - Or. English 4 June 2019 DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE Digital Disruption in Financial Markets – Note by the United States 5 June 2019 This document reproduces a written contribution from the United States submitted for Item 5 of the 131st OECD Competition committee meeting on 5-7 June 2019. More documents related to this discussion can be found at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/digital-disruption-in-financial-markets.htm Please contact Mr. Antonio Capobianco if you have any questions about this document [E-mail: [email protected]]. JT03448375 This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 2 │ DAF/COMP/WD(2019)55 United States 1. Introduction 1. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) submit this paper as part of the Competition Committee’s review of disruptive innovation involving financial technology. In this paper, we present relevant competition law and policy experiences of the DOJ and FTC as well as relevant aspects of the FTC’s consumer protection work. To provide broader context on issues outside the purview of this Committee, we also include views from a U.S. Department of the Treasury report on innovation in financial services and note that there are a number of efforts in other international forums on these issues outside the area of competition law and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for an Innovation Hub to Facilitate Measa
    THE CASE FOR AN INNOVATION HUB TO FACILITATE MEASA FINANCIAL INCLUSION Almost half of the world’s 1.7 billion financially excluded and underserved adults are currently concentrated in the Middle East, Africa and South Asia (MEASA). To date, efforts to address MEASA’s financial inclusion position have been heavily fragmented, impeding large-scale advancement. Given the size of the untapped market, and the urgent need for reforms, we call for the establishment of a regional innovation hub dedicated to the development of digital financial services. Given its unique profile, Dubai is ideally positioned to serve as the beating heart of such a hub. NEW GLOBAL MOMENTUM FOR (DIGITAL) FINANCIAL INCLUSION The push for advancement of financial inclusion has seen renewed global momentum. With 1.7 billion of the world’s global working population still lacking access to formal financial services, world leaders have committed themselves to ambitious targets for the acceleration of financial inclusion. G20 nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and other multilateral organisations are actively pushing a bold agenda and co-ordinating efforts via global alliances and working groups. Additionally, the United Nations has declared financial inclusion a core enabler for the achievement of its Sustainable Development Goals. These efforts have been underpinned by an unprecedented flow of funding directed towards financial inclusion initiatives. The Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP) estimates that no less than US$37 billion in funds was received in 2016 from public and private sources. Thanks to an ever-expanding adoption of smartphones, and the rapid evolution of new technologies, digitally enabled financial services have emerged as critical catalysts in the achievement of broad-scale financial inclusion.
    [Show full text]