DOCSLIB.ORG

DIET and PREY PREFERENCE of GIANT GARTERSNAKES (THAMNOPHIS GIGAS) in the SACRAMENTO VALLEY of CALIFORNIA a University Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DIET and PREY PREFERENCE of GIANT GARTERSNAKES (THAMNOPHIS GIGAS) in the SACRAMENTO VALLEY of CALIFORNIA a University Thesis DIET AND PREY PREFERENCE OF GIANT GARTERSNAKES (THAMNOPHIS GIGAS) IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA A University Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, East Bay In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Biological Sciences By Julia Samiye Martins Ersan December, 2015 i Copyright © 2015 by Julia Samiye Martins Ersan ii Abstract The introduction of exotic species into an environment can introduce great change in the trophic dynamics of native species. This is of even greater concern if the native species are threatened or endangered. The giant gartersnake (Thamnophis gigas), an endemic predator of the Central Valley of California, is listed as threatened, its decline because of the conversion of its once vast wetland habitat to agriculture. Another anthropogenic factor contributing to this snake’s changing ecology and potentially its decline is the introduction of non-native prey species into their habitats. These introductions have resulted in a prey community that is almost completely composed of exotics. Exotic prey can be detrimental to predators, potentially causing injury, parasitic infection, and intraguild predation. A first step toward understanding the effect(s) of exotic prey on giant gartersnakes is to determine whether and the degree to which these snakes have an affinity toward and will actually consume these species. I examined dietary choices in the giant gartersnake using laboratory and field studies to determine whether these snakes are selecting their prey or if they are simply consuming what is abundant. The laboratory component of my investigation was comprised of two sets of behavioral trials in which naïve neonates of wild-caught adult females from three different areas served as the focal animals. I examined: 1) neonate prey preference in response to olfactory cues of prepared prey extracts and 2) what neonates actually consumed when provided with a simultaneous choice of different live prey items. The field studies involved an analysis of prey selection where I: 1) quantified the available prey species in several known giant gartersnake habitats and 2) examined stomach contents to reveal the composition of the iii snakes’ actual diet. Results from these studies revealed that giant gartersnakes both preferred and selected native Sierran treefrogs. These results will contribute to a further understanding of the giant gartersnake’s diet, its role as a predator and the degree of impact, if any, exotic species might be having on them. This, in turn, can direct management and conservation efforts. iv Brian Halstead 12 / 2 / 15 v Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dr. Erica Wildy for serving as my major advisor and advocate in all matters related to the department. Thank you for your positivity, support and kindness. I am most grateful and indebted to Dr. Brian Halstead. Thank you for your brilliant insight and guidance through developing the experimental design and the manuscript preparation. I am particularly appreciative for all of the direction and instruction in regard to the statistical analyses. I thank Dr. Brian Perry for serving on my committee and for comments for revision on my thesis. I would like to thank my professors, Dr. Ellen Woodard and Dr. Christopher Kitting, and colleagues Kristy Howe and Brianne Brussee for their opinions on specific sections or chapters. I would like to thank Dr. Glenn Wylie and Mr. Mike Casazza for their advice with regard to presentations, general support of my project and my continued employment at USGS. A big thank you to all the landowners and land managers for allowing USGS to conduct research and capture snakes on their properties. Another big thanks to the many employees and volunteers that contributed to the capture and care of the many snakes used in the study, including but not limited to: Justin Demianew, Nicole Dotson, Allie Essert, Kristin Fouts, Anna Jordan, Dan Knapp, Brianna Larsen, Desmond Mackell, Sam McNally, Kristin Ober, and Shannon Skalos. vi To those in the Shaffer lab, particularly, Dr. Christopher Searcy for instilling in me a foundation to pursue herpetological study. Thanks to my friends and family, above all my mom, a most excellent role model and cheerleader who provided me with opportunities that eventually allowed me to pursue a career in the field for which I am most passionate. Also, my dad and aunt for caring about my success and happiness. I thank my sisters Ari, Ayşe, Morgan, Juliana, Zeka, Anna Joy, and Katie for emotional support, long phone conversations, and sleepovers. I would like to thank my love, Andrew Sutherland. Thank you for challenging me, for the in-depth discussion and edits on my thesis, and for inspiring and sharing with me a love for nature and fauna. I dedicate this thesis to the snakes. vii Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... x List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Thesis introduction ............................................................................................. 1 Statement of Thesis ......................................................................................................... 1 Biology of the Giant Gartersnake.................................................................................... 2 Taxonomy and Description ......................................................................................... 2 Natural History ............................................................................................................ 3 Distribution .................................................................................................................. 3 Threats and Conservation ............................................................................................ 5 Factors Potentially Affecting Diet Selection in the Giant Gartersnake .......................... 5 History of Methodology .................................................................................................. 8 Significance of the Methodology ................................................................................ 9 Thesis Organization....................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 2 Prey Preference and Selection of Neonate Giant Gartersnakes (Thamnophis gigas) from the Sacramento Valley of California ............................................................. 11 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 11 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 13 Experiment 1 – Neonate Responses to Olfactory Chemical Cues of Potential Prey (Day 15 to Day 20) .................................................................................................... 14 viii Experiment 2 – Neonate Prey Selection and Consumption (Multiple Aquatic Prey Species; Day 21) ........................................................................................................ 17 Experiment 3 – Neonate Feeding Behavior (Single Terrestrial Prey Species; Day 21) ................................................................................................................................... 21 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................. 22 Results ........................................................................................................................... 24 Prey Preference Trials ............................................................................................... 24 Prey Selection/ Consumption Trials .......................................................................... 28 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 33 Chapter 3 Giant gartersnake (Thamnophis gigas) prey selection ..................................... 42 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 42 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 43 Field Methods ............................................................................................................ 43 Analytical Methods.................................................................................................... 50 Results ........................................................................................................................... 51 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 4 Thesis Discussion ............................................................................................. 58 References ......................................................................................................................... 63 Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptile Collection Application
    Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Application for Reptile Collection Certificate of Registration Applications must be received through mail, email, or in person at the DWR Salt Lake Office Only by January 19, 2018 5:00 pm. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, ATTN: Wildlife Registration Office, PO Box 146301; 1594 W North Temple, Ste. 2110; Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6301 or email [email protected]. There is a $10.00 non-refundable handling fee and must be included when submitting application. You may enclose a check or money order payable to DWR, pay in person at a Division Office or arrange to make a credit card payment over the phone. Please list your phone number here to arrange payment by phone. The $75.00 Certificate of Registration fee will be collected from successful applicants upon approval. If necessary, a drawing will be conducted for those species that have more applications than available permits on January 24. Remaining permits will be available January 25 on a first-come, first-served basis at the DWR Salt Lake Office. Name________________________________ Phone_______________________ Email________________________ Address____________________________ City___________________ State________ ZIP________________ Date of Birth___________________________ Limit Total Collection Species per Authorized County Permits Season County California Kingsnake 6 2 Garfield, Kane, and San Juan March 1 - Oct 31 Daggett, Duchesne, Salt Lake, Summit, Smooth Greensnake 6 1 March 1 - Oct 31 Utah, Uintah, Wasatch, and Weber Beaver, Daggett,
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for the San Joaquin Valley Giant Garter Snake
    PROGRESS REPORT: 2003 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY GIANT GARTER SNAKE CONSERVATION PROJECT Prepared by: Todd Williams, Wildlife Biologist Veronica Wunderlich, Biological Science Technician U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service San Luis National Wildlife Refuge Complex Box 2176 Los Banos, CA 93635 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: The giant garter snake, Thamnophis gigas (Rossman & Stewart 1987), was designated as a federally threatened species throughout its range in October 1993 and (USFWS 1993). Giant garter snakes are endemic to the Central Valley of California, and historically occurred throughout the San Joaquin and Sacramento Valleys (Hansen and Brode 1980). They are thought to have occurred as far north as Butte County and south to Kern County, within the boundaries of the foothills of the Coastal and Sierra Nevada ranges. The current range of the giant garter snake is confined to the Sacramento Valley and isolated portions of the San Joaquin Valley (USFWS 1999). The giant garter snake is primarily an aquatic species that feeds on small fishes, tadpoles, and frogs (Fitch 1941). Historically, prey items included thick-tailed chub (Gila crassicauda), Sacramento blackfish (Orthodox microlepidus), and the California red- legged frog (Rana aurora draytoni), all of which have been extirpated from the giant garter snake’s current range (Rossman et al 1996). The habitat requirements of giant garter snakes include wetland areas with sufficient emergent vegetation for cover, openings in the vegetation for basking, and access to rodent burrows for shelter and winter periods of reduced activity (USFWS 1993). Giant garter snakes tend to be absent from rivers that support populations of large predatory fish as well as watercourses that have sand, gravel or rocky substrates (Hansen 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Garter Snake: the Role of Rice and Effects of Water Transfers
    Giant Garter Snake: The Role of Rice and Effects of Water Transfers Report of Point Blue Conservation Science May 2017 W. David Shuford Giant Garter Snake: The role of rice and effects of water transfers May 2017 Point Blue Conservation Science W. David Shuford Suggested Citation: Shuford, W. D. 2017. Giant Garter Snake: The role of rice and effects of water transfers. Report of Point Blue Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive #11, Petaluma, CA 94954. Point Blue Contribution No. 2133. Point Blue Conservation Science – Point Blue’s 140 staff and seasonal scientists conserve birds, other wildlife and their ecosystems through scientific research and outreach. At the core of our work is ecosystem science, studying birds and other indicators of nature’s health. Visit Point Blue on the web www.pointblue.org. Main Points Effects on the federally and state threatened giant garter snake are a major concern under a long-term (10-year) plan to transfer water from sellers in the Sacramento Valley to users south of the Delta or in the San Francisco Bay Area. Water will be made available for transfer from cropland idling, crop shifting, groundwater substitution, reservoir release, and conservation. A maximum of 60,693 acres of rice land would be fallowed each year if the full amount of 565,614 acre feet of surface water is transferred annually. This level of idling potentially could have major impacts on this snake given the current importance of the rice landscape in the Sacramento Valley to the species’ continued survival. Giant garter snakes in the Sacramento Valley have a strong association with natural wetlands and aquatic agricultural habitats, particularly rice and associated water conveyances.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Related to the Distribution and Prevalence
    Biological Conservation 144 (2011) 2913–2921 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Factors related to the distribution and prevalence of the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Rana cascadae and other amphibians in the Klamath Mountains ⇑ Jonah Piovia-Scott a,b, , Karen L. Pope c, Sharon P. Lawler a,d, Esther M. Cole e, Janet E. Foley b a Center for Population Biology, University of California – Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA b Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California – Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA c United States Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 1700 Bayview Drive, Arcata, CA 95521, USA d Department of Entomology, University of California – Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA e Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California – Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA article info abstract Article history: The fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which causes the disease chytridiomycosis, has Received 5 May 2011 been associated with declines and extinctions of montane amphibians worldwide. To gain insight into Received in revised form 29 July 2011 factors affecting its distribution and prevalence we focus on the amphibian community of the Klamath Accepted 22 August 2011 Mountains in northwest California. The Cascades frog (Rana cascadae), one of the most common amphib- Available online 5 October 2011 ians in these mountains, experienced increased mortality as a result of Bd exposure in laboratory trials and has experienced recent, dramatic declines in other parts of California. We surveyed 112 sites in Keywords: the Klamaths, all of which supported R.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Garter Snake Habitat Quantification Tool
    Giant Garter Snake Habitat Quantification Tool Part of the Multispecies Habitat Quantification Tool for the Central Valley Habitat Exchange Scientific Rationale and Methods Document, Version 5 Multispecies Habitat Quantification Tool: Giant Garter Snake Acknowledgements The development of the scientific approach for quantifying impacts and benefits to multiple species for use in the Central Valley Habitat Exchange (Exchange) would not have been possible without the input and guidance from a group of technical experts who worked to develop the contents of this tool. This included members of the following teams: Central Valley Habitat Exchange Project Coordinators John Cain (American Rivers) Daniel Kaiser (Environmental Defense Fund) Katie Riley (Environmental Incentives) Exchange Science Team Stefan Lorenzato (Department of Water Resources) Stacy Small-Lorenz (Environmental Defense Fund) Rene Henery (Trout Unlimited) Nat Seavy (Point Blue) Jacob Katz (CalTrout) Tool Developers Amy Merrill (Stillwater Sciences) Sara Gabrielson (Stillwater Sciences) Holly Burger (Stillwater Sciences) AJ Keith (Stillwater Sciences) Evan Patrick (Environmental Defense Fund) Kristen Boysen (Environmental Incentives) Giant Garter Snake TAC Brian Halstead (USGS) Laura Patterson (CDFW) Ron Melcer (formerly DWR; with Delta Stewardship Council as of February 2017) Chinook Salmon TAC Alison Collins (Metropolitan Water District) Brett Harvey (DWR) Brian Ellrott (NOAA/NMFS) Cesar Blanco (USFWS) Corey Phillis (Metropolitan Water District) Dave Vogel (Natural Resource
    [Show full text]
  • Edna), with a Case Study of Painted Turtle (Chrysemys Picta) Edna Under Field Conditions Clare I
    Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications 2-28-2019 A Brief Review of Non-Avian Reptile Environmental DNA (eDNA), with a Case Study of Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta) eDNA under Field Conditions Clare I. M. Adams University of Otago Luke A. Hoekstra Iowa State University, [email protected] Morgan R. Muell Southern Illinois University Carbondale Fredric J. Janzen Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/eeob_ag_pubs Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ eeob_ag_pubs/341. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Brief Review of Non-Avian Reptile Environmental DNA (eDNA), with a Case Study of Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta) eDNA under Field Conditions Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) is an increasingly used non-invasive molecular tool for detecting species presence and monitoring populations. In this article, we review the current state of non-avian reptile eDNA work in aquatic systems, as well as present a field experiment on detecting the presence of painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) eDNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Thamnophis Gigas)
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 13(1):80–90. Submitted: 2 June 2017; Accepted: 11 December 2017; Published 30 April 2018. REPRODUCTIVE FREQUENCY AND SIZE-DEPENDENCE OF FECUNDITY IN THE GIANT GARTERSNAKE (THAMNOPHIS GIGAS) JONATHAN P. ROSE1, JULIA S.M. ERSAN, GLENN D. WYLIE, MICHAEL L. CASAZZA, AND BRIAN J. HALSTEAD U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, California 95620, USA 1Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—How reproductive output changes with age or size is a key life-history trait that can affect which demographic rates most influence population growth. Although many studies have investigated the reproductive ecology of gartersnakes, we know little about reproduction in the threatened Giant Gartersnake, Thamnophis gigas. We used X-radiography to determine reproductive status and estimated fecundity for 73 female T. gigas collected from several regions within the range of this species in the Sacramento Valley of California, USA, and synthesize these data with data from litters born in captivity to improve our understanding of reproduction in this species. Average total litter size determined from X-rays (15.9) and captive-born litters (15.5) are within the ranges reported from other gartersnakes, but captive-born litters had high rates of stillbirth. Only 154 of 202 neonates from captive snakes were born alive, and seven of 13 litters contained at least one stillborn neonate. We found that fecundity was positively related to maternal snout-vent length, and some evidence that larger litters contained smaller neonates. The proportion of X-rayed females that were gravid was 0.50 in 2014, 0.47 in and 2015, and 0.64 in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Garter Snake (Thamnopsis Gigas)
    Reptiles Giant Garter Snake (Thamnopsis gigas) Giant Garter Snake (Thamnopsis gigas) Status State: Threatened Federal: Threatened Population Trend Global: Declining State: Declining Within Inventory Area: Unknown Data Characterization The location database for the giant garter snake (Thamnopsis gigas) within its known range in California includes 142 data records from 1908 to 2000. Of these, 30 were documented within the past 10 years, 12 or which are of high precision and may be accurately located. Two of these records are located outside but near the ECCC HCP/NCCP inventory area. This database includes records of individual sightings and locations of occupied, vacant, and natal dens. A moderate amount of literature is available for the giant garter snake because of its threatened status. Most of the literature pertains to habitat requirements, distribution, population demographics, threats, and management activities. A recovery plan for the giant garter snake has been published (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1999). Range The giant garter snake is endemic to the valley floor of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys of California. Records coincide with the historical distribution of large flood basins, freshwater marshes, and tributary streams of the Central Valley of California (Hansen and Brode 1980). The historic distribution of the giant garter snake extended from Sacramento and Contra Costa Counties southward to Buena Vista Lake near Bakersfield in Kern County. Some experts consider Contra Costa County outside the current range of giant garter snake; however the lack of records from the County may be due to a lack of survey effort (Hansen pers. comm.) (see below).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ponderosa - Winter 2019
    The Ponderosa - Winter 2019 The Pine Ridge Association Newsletter Henry W. Coe State Park Kingsnakes Creatures of Coe By Joseph Belli Kingsnakes may, after rattlesnakes, be the most familiar snakes to the gen- eral public. Many species feature attractive patterns, usually bands of several colors. Yet that’s not what they’re known for. Kingsnakes are famous for eat- ing other snakes, especially rattlesnakes, whose venom they’re immune to. That’s where the name comes from—what better title to bestow upon a snake that eats rattlers than the king of snakes? Then again, Budweiser was once known as the king of beers, and that crown hasn’t worn well over time. Kingsnakes, though, continue to enjoy a lofty reputation, getting the thumbs-up even from people who otherwise have no use for snakes. Far be it from me to besmirch the goodwill extended toward kingsnakes, but their rattlesnake-killing prowess is overrated. A friend living in Gold Country called me up excitedly last spring. He’d just seen a kingsnake on his property and was wondering if that meant the rattlesnakes would disappear. I told him not to hold his breath. Kingsnakes occasionally eat rattlesnakes, but they have a wide and varied diet consisting of lizards, amphibians, all sorts of snakes (including their own kind), birds, eggs, and small mammals. In short, they don’t single out rattlesnakes. California kingsnakes (Lampropeltis californiae), the banded, two-toned snakes found throughout most of the state, were until recently considered a subspecies of common kingsnake, one of a handful of snake species found coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources
    Chapter 6—Biological Resources 6.1 Introduction This chapter describes the existing conditions (environmental and regulatory) and assesses the potential biological resources impacts that may result from implementation of the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (proposed MTP/SCS). Where necessary and feasible, mitigation measures are identified to reduce these impacts. The information presented in this chapter is based on a review of existing and available information and is regional in scope. Data, analysis and findings provided in this chapter were considered and prepared at a programmatic level. In response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP), SACOG received one comment letter regarding biological resources from the Environmental Council of Sacramento. The commenter requested that the EIR should consider the following: . map anticipated impacts to inform potential adverse effects on habitat connectivity, and . identify wildlife species in the Delta and local rivers as areas of concern. The CEQA Guidelines note that comments received during the NOP scoping process can be helpful in “identifying the range of actions, alternatives, mitigation measures, and significant effects to be analyzed in depth in an EIR and in eliminating from detailed study issues found not to be important.” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15083.) Neither the CEQA Guidelines nor Statutes require a lead agency to respond directly to comments received in response to the NOP, but they do require they be considered. Consistent with these requirements, this comment has been carefully reviewed and considered by SACOG and is reflected in the analysis of impacts in this chapter. Appendix PD- 1 includes all NOP comments received. 6.2 Environmental Setting This environmental setting section contains information on the following existing biological resources: .
    [Show full text]
  • Garter Snake Population Dynamics from a 16-Year Study: Considerations for Ecological Monitoring
    Ecological Applications, 15(1), 2005, pp. 294±303 q 2005 by the Ecological Society of America GARTER SNAKE POPULATION DYNAMICS FROM A 16-YEAR STUDY: CONSIDERATIONS FOR ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AMY J. LIND,1 HARTWELL H. WELSH,JR., AND DAVID A. TALLMON2 USDA Forest Service, Paci®c Southwest Research Station, Redwood Sciences Laboratory, 1700 Bayview Drive, Arcata, California 95521 USA Abstract. Snakes have recently been proposed as model organisms for addressing both evolutionary and ecological questions. Because of their middle position in many food webs they may be useful indicators of trophic complexity and dynamics. However, reliable data on snake populations are rare due to the challenges of sampling these patchily distributed, cryptic, and often nocturnal species and also due to their underrepresentation in the eco- logical literature. Studying a diurnally active stream-associated population of garter snakes has allowed us to avoid some of these problems so that we could focus on issues of sampling design and its in¯uence on resulting demographic models and estimates. From 1986 to 2001, we gathered data on a population of the Paci®c coast aquatic garter snake (Thamnophis atratus) in northwestern California by conducting 3±5 surveys of the population annually. We derived estimates for sex-speci®c survival rates and time-dependent capture probabilities using population analysis software and examined the relationship between our calculated capture probabilities and variability in sampling effort. We also developed population size and density estimates and compared these estimates to simple count data (often used for wildlife population monitoring). Over the 16-yr period of our study, we marked 1730 snakes and had annual recapture rates ranging from 13% to 32%.
    [Show full text]