CITY PROFILE 2019

GOOD GOVERNANCE Feeling that authorities represent citizens’ concerns 3.3 3.7 Mariupol 15 cities* and views, equally care about all parts of and are ready to listen UKRAINIAN ACCOUNTABILITY AUTHORITIES CARE OF AUTHORITIES TRUST IN OR 5.1 HEAD OF THE TOWN Prioritize anti-corruption initiatives, especially among TRUST IN TOWN 4.4 doctors and judges/prosecutors. Building trust in courts ADMINISTRATION could strengthen feeling of justice and safety.

TRUST IN POLICE 3.9 Perceived corruption is still very high despite the high levels of tolerance to corruption. 47 % of Mariupol respondents believe TRUST IN NON- that accepting small amounts of money or taking gifts for GOVERNMENTAL 5.0 performing official functions is not corruption ORGANISATIONS LEVEL OF PERCEIVED CORRUPTION AMONG… TRUST IN COURTS 2.6

0 2 4 6 8 10 8.4 8.2 7.7 6.9 6.8 Communicate the effectiveness of NGO activities 5.3 to increase citizens’ trust and thus their engagement. DOCTORS JUDGES/ PARLIAMENTA- POLICE TEACHERS LOCAL PROSECUTORS RIANS AUTHORITIES

COMMUNITY BONDS SOCIAL TOLERANCE In terms of personal interaction and/or acceptance in the community Mariupol 15 cities* IDPS 8.6

Mariupol citizens PEOPLE WITH feel the highest A DIFFERENT COLOUR 7.0 social threat OF SKIN towards ATO/JFO military (3.9) 6.5 out of all 15 cities 5.9 (3.2 on average) IMMIGRANTS 6.2 4.5 3.2 MUSLIMS 5.4

ROMA 4.7

COMMUNITY CONFIDENCE SOCIAL THREAT COOPERATION THAT PEOPLE FROM DIFFERENT LBGTQ+ 2.9 Feeling that people in their FROM DIFFERENT GROUPS community care for each GROUPS WILL Feeling that different other and cooperate to LISTEN socio-demographic DRUG ADDICTS 2.3 solve common problems (i.e. IDPs, people from groups may undermine western and eastern the unity of their Ukraine, pro-EU etc.) community 0 2 4 6 8 10 Support community/neighbourhood initiatives Develop a culture of dialogue through meaningful to jointly define and solve common problems. This contact between people with different political views way people will feel they can rely on each other. and from different regions.

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, , , , , , Pokrovsk, , , , , Mariinka, , , . Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city). among 15 cities among 15 cities LOCALITY SATISFACTION SATISFACTION WITH CITY LIFE (in terms of jobs, leisure activities 6.4 5.8 and raising children)

Mariupol 15 cities*

SAFETY & SECURITY ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY

POLITICAL SECURITY Freedom to express 4.7 political opinions ECONOMIC SECURITY Being able to provide 4.6 for your family PERSONAL SECURITY Feeling safe on the streets 4.2 and protected by the police ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY 2.1 Satisfied with the state of environment and air quality 0 2 4 6 8 10

SERVICES & EMPLOYMENT

PROVISION OF PUBLIC 5.9 SERVICES

PROVISION OF 5.8 INFRASTRUCTURE

EMPLOYMENT 4.4 OPPORTUNITIES

0 2 4 6 8 10 Prioritise development and communication of environmental initiatives. PRIDE IN YOUR LOCALITY

When you think about your locality, to what extent are you proud of the following?

PRIDE IN Interventions in the industry and CUISINE 7.3 LOCALITY (OVERALL) production sector of Mariupol can be met with resistance. HOSPITALITY 7.2 6.1 6.2 Make sure to discuss them with the community to generate FAMOUS PEOPLE 6.7 support.

CREATIVITY 6.5 CIVIC BEHAVIOUR

TRADITIONS 6.4 To change 41 % ACTIVE things in your Willing to use political and social means community you of action without violence NATURE 6.2 are... 4 % VIOLENT CULTURAL HERITAGE 6.2 Willing to use violence

55 % PASSIVE INDUSTRY AND 5.2 PRODUCTION Not willing to do anything

COMMUNITY BONDS 4.8 To motivate passive citizens, concentrate on small SAFETY AND 4.1 scale civic initiatives relevant to their sense of pride SECURITY that bring immediate benefit to the community. 0 2 4 6 8 10

* CITIES WERE SELECTED BASED ON THE DG EAST PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST: Mariupol, Kramatorsk, Lysychansk, Sloviansk, Bakhmut, Kostiantynivka, Pokrovsk, Druzhkivka, Starobilsk, Highest SCORE Lowest SCORE Popasna, Stanytsia Luhanska, Mariinka, Sievierodonetsk, Melitopol, Berdyansk. among 15 cities among 15 cities A total of 3000 respondents were sampled in 15 cities (200 per city).

City profiles are part ofthe SCORE for 2019 project funded by the USAID, implemented by the Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development (SeeD), and in partnership with the UN Recovery and Peacebuilding Programme. The contents of this research do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government or UN. For more information, please visit www.scoreforpeace.org