DOCSLIB.ORG

Solution to Darwin's Dilemma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solution to Darwin's Dilemma Colloquium Solution to Darwin’s dilemma: Discovery of the missing Precambrian record of life J. William Schopf* Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics (Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life), and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567 In 1859, in On the Origin of Species, Darwin broached what he Darwin’s dilemma begged for solution. And although this regarded to be the most vexing problem facing his theory of problem was to remain unsolved—the case ‘‘inexplicable’’—for evolution—the lack of a rich fossil record predating the rise of more than 100 years, the intervening century was not without shelly invertebrates that marks the beginning of the Cambrian bold pronouncements, dashed dreams, and more than little acid Period of geologic time (Ϸ550 million years ago), an ‘‘inexplicable’’ acrimony. absence that could be ‘‘truly urged as a valid argument’’ against his all embracing synthesis. For more than 100 years, the ‘‘missing J. W. Dawson and the ‘‘Dawn Animal of Canada.’’ Among the first to Precambrian history of life’’ stood out as one of the greatest take up the challenge of Darwin’s theory and its most vexing unsolved mysteries in natural science. But in recent decades, problem, the missing early fossil record, was John William understanding of life’s history has changed markedly as the doc- Dawson (1820–1899), Principal of McGill University and a giant umented fossil record has been extended seven-fold to some 3,500 in the history of North American geology. Schooled chiefly in million years ago, an age more than three-quarters that of the Edinburgh, Scotland, the son of strict Scottish Presbyterians, planet itself. This long-sought solution to Darwin’s dilemma was Dawson was a staunch Calvinist and devout antievolutionist (3). set in motion by a small vanguard of workers who blazed the trail in the 1950s and 1960s, just as their course was charted by a few In 1858, a year before publication of Darwin’s opus, specimens pioneering pathfinders of the previous century, a history of bold of distinctively green- and white-layered limestone collected pronouncements, dashed dreams, search, and final discovery. along the Ottawa River to the west of Montreal were brought to the attention of William E. Logan, Director of the Geological Survey of Canada. Because the samples were known to be n 1950, when Ledyard Stebbins’ Variation and Evolution in ancient (from ‘‘Laurentian’’ strata, now dated at about 1,100 Plants (1) first appeared, the known history of life—the I million years) and exhibited layering that Logan supposed too familiar progression from spore-producing to seed-producing to regular to be purely inorganic (Fig. 1), he displayed them as flowering plants, from marine invertebrates to fish, amphibians, then reptiles, birds, and mammals—extended only to the begin- possible ‘‘pre-Cambrian fossils’’ at various scientific conferences, ning of the Cambrian Period of the Phanerozoic Eon, roughly where they elicited spirited discussion but gained little accep- 550 million years ago. Now, after a half-century of discoveries, tance as remnants of early life. life’s history looks strikingly different—an immense early fossil In 1864, however, Logan brought specimens to Dawson who record, unknown and assumed unknowable, has been uncovered not only confirmed their biologic origin but identified them as to reveal an evolutionary progression dominated by microbes fossilized shells of giant foraminiferans, huge oversized versions that stretches seven times farther into the geologic past than of tiny calcareous protozoal tests. So convinced was Dawson of COLLOQUIUM previously was known. This essay is an abbreviated history of their biologic origin that a year later, in 1865, he formally named how and by whom the known antiquity of life has been steadily the putative fossils Eozoon canadense, the ‘‘dawn animal of extended, and of lessons learned in this still ongoing hunt for Canada.’’ Dawson’s interpretation was questioned almost im- life’s beginnings. mediately (5), the opening shot of a fractious debate that raged on until 1894 when specimens of Eozoon were found near Mt. Pioneering Pathfinders Vesuvius and shown to be geologically young ejected blocks of Darwin’s Dilemma. Like so many aspects of natural science, the limestone, their ‘‘fossil-like’’ appearance the result of inorganic beginnings of the search for life’s earliest history date from the alteration and veining by the green metamorphic mineral ser- mid-1800s and the writings of Charles Darwin (1809–1882), who pentine (6). in On the Origin of Species first focused attention on the missing Yet despite the overwhelming evidence, Dawson continued to Precambrian fossil record and the problem it posed to his theory press his case for the rest of his life, spurred by his deeply held of evolution: ‘‘There is another . difficulty, which is much more belief that discovery of his ‘‘dawn animal’’ had exposed the serious. I allude to the manner in which species belonging to greatest missing link in the entire fossil record, a gap so several of the main divisions of the animal kingdom suddenly enormous that it served to unmask the myth of evolution’s appear in the lowest known [Cambrian-age] fossiliferous rocks claimed continuity and left Biblical creation as the only answer: . If the theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest ‘‘There is no link whatever in geological fact to connect Eozoon Cambrian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed . and with the Mollusks, Radiates, or Crustaceans of the succeeding that during these vast periods, the world swarmed with living [rock record] . these stand before us as distinct creations. [A] creatures... [But] to the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods before the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer. This paper was presented at the National Academy of Sciences colloquium ‘‘Variation and The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly Evolution in Plants and Microorganisms: Toward a New Synthesis 50 Years After Stebbins,’’ urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained’’ held January 27–29, 2000, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center in Irvine, CA. (ref. 2, Chapter X). *E-mail: [email protected]. PNAS ͉ June 20, 2000 ͉ vol. 97 ͉ no. 13 ͉ 6947–6953 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 Fig. 1. Eozoon canadense, the ‘‘dawn animal of Canada,’’ as illustrated in Dawson’s The Dawn of Life (4) (A) and shown by the holotype specimen archived in the U.S. National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC (B). (Bars ϭ 1 cm.) gap . yawns in our imperfect geological record. Of actual facts [with which to fill this gap], therefore, we have none; and those evolutionists who have regarded the dawn-animal as an evidence in their favour, have been obliged to have recourse to supposition and assumption’’ (ref. 4, p. 227). (In part, Dawson was right. In the fourth and all later editions of The Origin, Darwin cited the great age and primitive protozoal relations of Eozoon as con- sistent with his theory of evolution, just the sort of ‘‘supposition and assumption’’ that Dawson found so distressing.) C. D. Walcott: Founder of Precambrian Paleobiology. Fortunately, Dawson’s debacle would ultimately prove to be little more than a distracting detour on the path to progress, a redirection spurred initially by the prescient contributions of the American paleon- tologist Charles Doolittle Walcott (1850–1927). Like Dawson before him, Walcott was enormously energetic and highly influential (7, 8). He spent most of his adult life in Fig. 2. Cryptozoon reefs near Saratoga, NY. (Photo by E. S. Barghoorn, Washington, DC, where he served as the CEO of powerful November, 1964.) scientific organizations—first, as Director of the U.S. Geological fossils, the first true cellularly preserved Precambrian organisms Survey (1894–1907), then Secretary of the Smithsonian Institu- ever recorded. tion (1907–1927) and President of the National Academy of After the turn of the century, Walcott moved his field work Sciences (1917–1923). Surprisingly, however, Walcott had little northward along the spine of the Rocky Mountains, focusing first formal education. As a youth in northern New York State he in the Lewis Range of northwestern Montana, from which he received but 10 years of schooling, first in public schools and, reported diverse stromatolitelike structures (11) and, later, later, at Utica Academy (from which he did not graduate). He chains of minute cell-like bodies he identified as fossil bacteria never attended college and had no formally earned advanced (12). His studies in the Canadian Rockies, from 1907 to 1925, degrees (a deficiency more than made up for in later life when were even more rewarding, resulting in discovery of an amazingly he was awarded honorary doctorates by a dozen academic well preserved assemblage of Cambrian algae and marine in- institutions). vertebrates—the famous Burgess Shale Fauna that to this day In 1878, as a 28-year-old apprentice to James Hall, Chief remains among the finest and most complete samples of Cam- Geologist of the state of New York and acknowledged dean of brian life known to science (13, 14). American paleontology, Walcott was first introduced to stroma- Walcott’s contributions are legendary—he was the first dis- tolites—wavy layered mound-shaped rock masses laid down by coverer in Precambrian rocks of Cryptozoon stromatolites, of ancient communities of mat-building microbes—Cambrian-age cellularly preserved algal plankton (Chuaria), and of possible structures near the town of Saratoga in eastern New York State. fossil bacteria, all capped by his pioneering investigations of the Named Cryptozoon (meaning ‘‘hidden life’’), these cabbagelike benchmark Burgess Shale fossils.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ediacaran) of Earth – Nature’S Experiments
    The Early Animals (Ediacaran) of Earth – Nature’s Experiments Donald Baumgartner Medical Entomologist, Biologist, and Fossil Enthusiast Presentation before Chicago Rocks and Mineral Society May 10, 2014 Illinois Famous for Pennsylvanian Fossils 3 In the Beginning: The Big Bang . Earth formed 4.6 billion years ago Fossil Record Order 95% of higher taxa: Random plant divisions domains & kingdoms Cambrian Atdabanian Fauna Vendian Tommotian Fauna Ediacaran Fauna protists Proterozoic algae McConnell (Baptist)College Pre C - Fossil Order Archaean bacteria Source: Truett Kurt Wise The First Cells . 3.8 billion years ago, oxygen levels in atmosphere and seas were low • Early prokaryotic cells probably were anaerobic • Stromatolites . Divergence separated bacteria from ancestors of archaeans and eukaryotes Stromatolites Dominated the Earth Stromatolites of cyanobacteria ruled the Earth from 3.8 b.y. to 600 m. [2.5 b.y.]. Believed that Earth glaciations are correlated with great demise of stromatolites world-wide. 8 The Oxygen Atmosphere . Cyanobacteria evolved an oxygen-releasing, noncyclic pathway of photosynthesis • Changed Earth’s atmosphere . Increased oxygen favored aerobic respiration Early Multi-Cellular Life Was Born Eosphaera & Kakabekia at 2 b.y in Canada Gunflint Chert 11 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Life (1) Alga Eukaryote Grypania of MI at 1.85 b.y. MI fossil outcrop 12 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Life (2) Beads Horodyskia of MT and Aust. at 1.5 b.y. thought to be algae 13 Source: Fedonkin et al. 2007 Rise of Animals Tappania Fungus at 1.5 b.y Described now from China, Russia, Canada, India, & Australia 14 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Animals (3) Worm-like Parmia of N.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeobiology of the Early Ediacaran Shuurgat Formation, Zavkhan Terrane, South-Western Mongolia
    Journal of Systematic Palaeontology ISSN: 1477-2019 (Print) 1478-0941 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjsp20 Palaeobiology of the early Ediacaran Shuurgat Formation, Zavkhan Terrane, south-western Mongolia Ross P. Anderson, Sean McMahon, Uyanga Bold, Francis A. Macdonald & Derek E. G. Briggs To cite this article: Ross P. Anderson, Sean McMahon, Uyanga Bold, Francis A. Macdonald & Derek E. G. Briggs (2016): Palaeobiology of the early Ediacaran Shuurgat Formation, Zavkhan Terrane, south-western Mongolia, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2016.1259272 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1259272 Published online: 20 Dec 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 48 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjsp20 Download by: [Harvard Library] Date: 31 January 2017, At: 11:48 Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2016.1259272 Palaeobiology of the early Ediacaran Shuurgat Formation, Zavkhan Terrane, south-western Mongolia Ross P. Anderson a*,SeanMcMahona,UyangaBoldb, Francis A. Macdonaldc and Derek E. G. Briggsa,d aDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA; bDepartment of Earth Science and Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan; cDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA; dPeabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, 170 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA (Received 4 June 2016; accepted 27 September 2016) Early diagenetic chert nodules and small phosphatic clasts in carbonates from the early Ediacaran Shuurgat Formation on the Zavkhan Terrane of south-western Mongolia preserve diverse microfossil communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Curran Microfossils and the Depositional Environment of The
    Joe Curran Microfossils and the Depositional Environment of the Gunflint Iron Formation A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Geology) at GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE 2012 Abstract The Gunflint Iron Formation was deposited during the mid-Paleoproterozoic, shortly after the early Paleoproterozoic Great Oxygenation Event(GOE), when the atmosphere and oceans became oxygenated for the first time. The lowermost portions of the Gunflint Iron Formation contain black, early diagenetic chert with locally abundant microfossils. Reconstructing the life habits and ecology of the microfossil assemblages allows us to better understand the shallow water sedimantary conditions during the post GOE interval. Eosphaera and Kakabekia are two distinctive genera that occur in the Gunflint, but they likely had different habitats. Kakabekia has a morphology similar to iron metabolizing bacteria that live today in anoxic soil microhabitats. In the Gunflint, Kakabekia occurs in association with filamehts and coccoidal microfossils that likely lived in or near stromatolites on the sea floor. The association with this likely iron bacteria and a benthic microbial community suggests that most of the Gunflint microflora was benthic and possibly living in ferruginous, anoxic conditions. In contrast, Eosphaera fossils are rare and not strongly associated with the main community components. Eosphaera’s morphological similarity with the modern alga Volvox suggests that Eosphaera may also have hada photosynthetic metabolism. Eosphaera is plausibly interpreted as an oxygenic photosyhthesizer that lived in an oxic zone above the seafloor. If correct, this interpretation suggests close spatial proximity of oxic and anoxic environments in the Paleoproterozoic iron formations.
    [Show full text]
  • GY 112 Lecture Note Series
    GY 112 Lecture Notes 20: Stromatolites Lecture Goals: A) Cyanobacteria B) Stromatolites C) Invasion Earth! The colonization of terrestrial environments begins. Textbook reference: Levin, Chapter 6 (pages 226-231) and Chapter 10 (page 334) A) Cyanobacteria When last we met, we discussed the “evolution” of the oceans and the Earth’s atmosphere. Were it not for the presence of simple prokaryotic life forms, our oceans and our atmosphere would have remained anaerobic. I may have left you with the impression that the anaerobic prokaryotes of the past were ideally suited for their environment. At first they probably were, but there must have been a time when things became less ideal for them. The first prokaryotes probably just digested whatever organic “food” happened to be around in the oceans they were living in. Yes, they would have been somewhat cannibalistic (if bacteria eating bacteria can be regarded in this fashion). This type of opportunistic feeding method is called heterotrophisis and beasties that eat in this manner are called heterotrophs. Eventually the food would start to run out and this would have likely induced evolutionary changes in the organisms around at the time. If organisms could produce their own food supply, they would have a distinct advantage over those that could not, especially if food supplies started to dwindle. Today we have many organisms that produce their own nutrients. The process is called autotrophisis and the organisms that do this are called autotrophs. Many types of bacteria today use either carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or ammonia to produce the energy that they need to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Gunflint Chert and Its Implications for Eukaryote Origins
    A ‘Giant Microfossil’ from the Gunflint Chert and its Implications for Eukaryote Origins Mark A. S. McMenamin1,*, Aurora Curtis-Hill1, Sophie Rabinow1, Kalyndi Martin1 and Destiny Treloar1 1 Department of Geology and Geography, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts, United States *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 413-538-2280 Copyright©2019 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract We report here a ‘giant microfossil’ resembling 2. Geological Setting the conidium of an ascomycete fungus (cf. Alternaria alternata). The specimen is preserved in stromatolitic black The Gunflint Iron Formation is known for its chert of the Gunflint Iron Formation (Paleoproterozoic Eon, microfossiliferous black cherts. These cherts have produced Orosirian Period, ca. 1.9-2.0 Ga) of southern Ontario, compelling evidence for very ancient (ca. 2 Ga) microbial Canada, and the rock that provided the thin section may life [3-11]. Tyler and Barghoorn [3] noted that as “far as we have been collected by Elso Barghoorn as part of the are aware, these [microbes] are the oldest structurally original discovery of the Gunflint microbiota. The large size preserved organisms . and, as such, are of great interest of the fossil sets it apart from other, tiny by comparison, in the evolutionary scheme of primitive life.” This paper [3] Gunflint microfossils. The fossil is 200 microns in length is considered one of the great classics of American earth and has cross walls. Individual cells are 30-46 microns in science (“a benchmark, a monumental ‘first’” [5]).
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoscale Analysis of Pyritized Microfossils Reveals Differential Heterotrophic Consumption in the ∼1.9-Ga Gunflint Chert
    Nanoscale analysis of pyritized microfossils reveals differential heterotrophic consumption in the ∼1.9-Ga Gunflint chert David Waceya,b,1, Nicola McLoughlina, Matt R. Kilburnb, Martin Saundersc, John B. Cliffb, Charlie Kongd, Mark E. Barleye, and Martin D. Brasierf aDepartment of Earth Sciences and Centre for Geobiology, University of Bergen, N-5007 Bergen, Norway; bAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems, Centre for Microscopy Characterisation and Analysis, and Centre for Exploration Targeting, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; cCentre for Microscopy Characterisation and Analysis and eAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems and School of Earth and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; dElectron Microscopy Unit, University of New South Wales, Kingsford, NSW 2052, Australia; and fDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3AN, United Kingdom Edited* by Norman H. Sleep, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved April 8, 2013 (received for review January 9, 2013) The 1.88-Ga Gunflint biota is one of the most famous Precambrian transition was prolonged and spatially variable, with oxygenated microfossil lagerstätten and provides a key record of the biosphere surface waters potentially underlain by sulfidic wedges and at a time of changing oceanic redox structure and chemistry. Here, deeper ferruginous waters for much of the mid- to late Prote- we report on pyritized replicas of the iconic autotrophic Gunflintia– rozoic (12, 13). Hence, pyritic microfossils are of interest for Huroniospora microfossil assemblage from the Schreiber Locality, information they may reveal about the geochemical cycles of iron Canada, that help capture a view through multiple trophic levels and sulfur, as well as carbon, at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history Main articles: History of the Earth and Geological his- chondrules,[1] are a key signature of a supernova ex- tory of Earth plosion. See also: Geologic time scale and Timeline of evolution- ary history of life • 4,567±3 Ma: Rapid collapse of hydrogen molecular For earlier events, see Timeline of the formation of the cloud, forming a third-generation Population I star, Universe. the Sun, in a region of the Galactic Habitable Zone This timeline of natural history summarizes signifi- (GHZ), about 25,000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.[2] • 4,566±2 Ma: A protoplanetary disc (from which Earth eventually forms) emerges around the young Sun, which is in its T Tauri stage. • 4,560–4,550 Ma: Proto-Earth forms at the outer (cooler) edge of the habitable zone of the Solar Sys- tem. At this stage the solar constant of the Sun was only about 73% of its current value, but liquid wa- ter may have existed on the surface of the Proto- Earth, probably due to the greenhouse warming of high levels of methane and carbon dioxide present in the atmosphere. Early bombardment phase begins: because the solar neighbourhood is rife with large planetoids and debris, Earth experiences a number of giant impacts that help to increase its overall size. Visual representation of the history of life on Earth as a spiral 2 Hadean Eon cant geological and biological events from the formation of the Earth to the rise of modern humans. Times are listed in millions of years, or megaanni (Ma).
    [Show full text]
  • The Gunflint Microbiota*
    Precambrian Research, 5 (1977) 121--142 121 © Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam -- Printed in The Netherlands THE GUNFLINT MICROBIOTA* STANLEY M. AWRAMIK and ELSO S. BARGHOORN Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Calif. 93106 (U.S.A.) The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 02138 (U.S.A.) ABSTRACT Awramik, S.M. and Barghoorn, E.S., 1977. The Gunflint microbiota. Precambrian Res., 5: 121--142. The microbiota of the Gunflint Iron Formation (~2 Ga old) is sufficiently great in diversity as to represent a "benchmark" in the level of evolution at a time only somewhat less than intermediate between the origin of the earth and the present. To date, thirty entities from these ~ 2 Ga old microfossiliferous cherts have been de- scribed and all but two systematically categorized. From our continuing detailed study of the Gunflint microbiota (ESB for over 20 years) and, in light of our recent investigations on blue-green algal cell degradation, we conclude that: (1) A considerable number of the taxa systematically described are either of doubtful biological origin, doubtful taxonomic assignment, and/or morohologically indistinguishable from previously described Gunflint microorganisms. (2) The microbiota is wholly prokaryotic. At present, we recognize sixteen taxa falling within three categories: (1) blue-green algae (6 taxa; e.g. Gunflintia minuta); (2) budding bacteria (4 taxa; e.g. Eoastrion simplex); and (3) unknown affinities (6 taxa; e.g. Eosphaera tyleri). Organisms of undoubted euka- ryotic affinities have yet to be found in the Gunflint. The Gunfiint assemblage includes a high percentage of morphologic entities of obscure taxonomic position.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the NATIONAL ACADEMY of SCIENCES
    Proceedings of the NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Volume 47 - Number 11 November 15, 1961 WOODRING CONFERENCE ON MAJOR BIOLOGIC INNOVATIONS AND THE GEOLOGIC RECORD BY P. E. CLOUD, JR., AND P. H. ABELSON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, AND GEOPHYSICAL LABORATORY, CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON Communicated September 29, 1961 The problem of correlating biochemical and phenotypical evolution was raised by W. P. Woodring6l at the spring meeting of the Academy in 1951. This led to the organization of a highly productive conference on biochemistry, paleoecology, and evolution, held at Shelter Island in June, 1953.62 Early in 1961 several of the participants in that conference decided that it was time for a new multi-disciplinary consideration of major biological innovations in the context of the geologic record, and with emphasis on the nature, manifestations, and timing of events leading to the first Metazoa. P. H. Abelson, W. H. Bradley, P. E. Cloud, Jr., Sterling Hendricks, K. E. Lohman, and W. W. Rubey constituted an organizing committee whose activities were sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences and the Carnegie Institution of Washington, with funds from the National Science Foundation. The conference was named in recognition of its ancestry and in appreciation of Woodring's outstanding contributions to science. The Woodring Conference was held at Big Meadows Lodge, Skyline Drive, Virginia, June 14-16, 1961. It was attended by twenty-three biochemists, biolo- gists, biophysicists, geologists, paleontologists, and geochemists: P. H. Abelson, C. B. Anfinsen, Elso Barghoorn, David Bonner, W. H. Bradley, M. N. Bramlette, Melvin Calvin, P. E. Cloud, Jr., Marcel Florkin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Junction of the Seemingly Dividing Globular Bodies Here Described
    REPRODUCTIVE STRUCTURES AND TAXONOAHIC AFFINITIES OF SOME NANNOFOSSILS FROM1 THE GUNFLINT IRON FORMIA TION* BY G. R. LICARI AND P. E. CLOUD, JR. DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (LOS ANGELES) Communicate(l November 22, 1967, It is difficult, and crucial, in studying possible records of life from very ancient rocks, or from extraterrestrial sources, to establish both that elements observed could not have resulted from nonvital processes, and that they are surely endemic to the substrates in which found. In the case of the diverse and well- preserved microbiota found in cherts of the approximately 1.9 billion-year-old Gunflint Iron Formation of southern Ontario, convincing evidence for a vital origin and compelling evidence for the endemic nature of vital elements observed has already beei advanced.1-4 We present here what we take as both a final link in the chain of evidence for a biological origin and the basis for more satis- factory conclusions as to the taxonomic affinities of some of the conspicuous biotal elements (Figs. 1-20). This new evidence consists mainly of features that closely resemble the re- productive structures of certain living algae, but displayed by specimens of the Gunflint microbiota. All of the fossil material here described comes from chert in the pre-Paleozoic Gunflint Iron Formation at Schreiber Beach, on the north shore of Lake Superior, about 6..5 km west-southwest of Schreiber, Ontario (Cloud's locality 1 of 8/25/1963), as previously discussed.2 It was studied optically, in thin sections of the rock, using oil-immersion techniques and phase-contrast lighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Geobiology 2007 Lecture 4 the Antiquity of Life on Earth Homework #2
    Geobiology 2007 Lecture 4 The Antiquity of Life on Earth Homework #2 Topics (choose 1): Describe criteria for biogenicity in microscopic fossils. How do the oldest described fossils compare? How has the Brasier-Schopf debate shifted in five years? OR What are stromatolites; where are they found and how are they formed? Articulate the two sides of the debate on antiquity and biogenicity. Up to 4 pages, including figures. Due 3/01/2006 Required readings for this lecture Nisbet E. G. & Sleep N. H. (2001) The habitat and nature of early life, Nature 409, 1083. Schopf J.W. et al., (2002) Laser Raman Imagery of Earth’s earliest fossils. Nature 416, 73. Brasier M.D. et al., (2002) Questioning the evidence for Earth’s oldest fossils. Nature 416, 76. Garcia-Ruiz J.M., Hyde S.T., Carnerup A. M. , Christy v, Van Kranendonk M. J. and Welham N. J. (2003) Self-Assembled Silica-Carbonate Structures and Detection of Ancient Microfossils Science 302, 1194-7. Hofmann, H.J., Grey, K., Hickman, A.H., and Thorpe, R. 1999. Origin of 3.45 Ga coniform stromatolites in Warrawoona Group, Western Australia. Geological Society of America, Bulletin, v. 111 (8), p. 1256-1262. Allwood et al., (2006) Stromatolite reef from the Early Archaean era of Australia. Nature 441|, 714 J. William Schopf, Fossil evidence of Archaean life (2006) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 869–885. Martin Brasier, Nicola McLoughlin, Owen Green and David Wacey (2006) A fresh look at the fossil evidence for early Archaean cellular life. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 887–902 What is Life? “Life can be recognized by its deeds — life is disequilibrium, leaving behind the signatures of disequilibrium such as fractionated isotopes or complex molecules.
    [Show full text]