DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals: Identification, Data, and Dissemination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals: Identification, Data, and Dissemination World Bank Knowledge for Change Program – Full Proposal Templet Basic Data: Title Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals: Identification, Data, and Dissemination Linked Project ID (if available) Product Line RA Applied Amount ($) 150,000 Est. Project Period 11/15/2018 -06/15/2021 Team Leader(s) Hai-Anh Dang (TTL); Managing Unit DECSU Umar Serajuddin (co- TTL) Contributing unit(s) DECDD, GEDGE, GWA08 Funding Window Innovation in Data Production, Analysis and Dissemination Regions/Countries World General: 1. What is the Development Objective (or main objective) of this Grant? The World Bank is currently responsible for monitoring the progress of 20 indicators of the 230 or so Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicators, and involved in the production of an extended group of 23 additional indicators. The main objective of this work is to conduct research on the key 20 SDG indicators that the World Bank is in charge of, and to provide guidance for further improvement on data collection and analysis. We aim to improve and refine the list of these indicators to provide a more useful assessment, together with a dissemination tool that can better serve the Bank’s twin goals (both of which are prominent SDG targets as well). More specifically, our proposed work aims to i) examine the 20 indicators that the Bank are currently responsible for, and investigate to what extent these indicators can form a subset that represent the 232 indicators ii) identify a core group of indicators that can help track the progress of all the 232 indicators, which provides insights on potential changes and modifications to the 20 indicators the Bank is responsible for iii) employ relevant statistical methods to construct a richer and more complete database of this core group of indicators that enables tracking a country’s SDG progress over time. 2. Summary description of Grant financed activities Page 1 of 24 World Bank Knowledge for Change Program – Full Proposal Templet We propose two sets of activities under this Grant. The first set of activities conducts research on the Bank’s current list of SDG indicators. We will study a number of challenges facing the construction and monitoring of the Bank’s indicators, and all the SDG indicators in general. These challenges consist of the following i) the extent that the current indicators the Bank is responsible for represents all the SDG indicators ii) whether we can identify a core group of indicators that allows useful analysis and facilitates data collection efforts iii) how we interpret the progress of the SDG indicators, and iv) the best-practices solutions to address the issue of missing values. The second set of activities focuses on capacity building and dissemination. In particular, we will disseminate the outputs obtained in the first set of activities above in a variety of outlets, including ▪ policy discussions with our counterparts who are in charge of monitoring the SDGs at the United Nations and other international organizations ▪ professional conferences and academic seminars related to the SDGs ▪ World Bank products on the SDGs that we are in charge of, including the World Bank’s SDG Atlas and websites We will also actively engage in social media, including writing blog posts, to further disseminate our results and build capacity on a world-wide, wholesale basis. One particular blog that we will contribute posts to is the Open Data Blog, which is currently the most read blog of the World Bank. 3. What are the main risks related to the Grant financed activity? Are there any potential conflicts of interest for the Bank? How will these risks/conflicts be monitored and managed? There are minimal risks associated with the proposed activities. The main source of risk is that there are currently a number of missing values for the SDG indicators. This is a data challenge that will need to be satisfactorily solved for better monitoring of the trends of the indicators over time. But this issue of missing values is in fact one of the research questions that we propose to address under this Grant. We will minimize this risk by applying the latest analytical techniques in the relevant statistical and economic literatures. We will also obtain advice from our advisors and other leading experts in academia for further improvement. 4. (Optional question) What can/has been done to find an alternative source of financing, i.e. instead of a Bank administered Grant? In addition to the proposed Grant financing, we have secured some additional fund, which include staff time of $50,000 from the Bank’s budget (BB). KCPIII Specific: 1. How does (do) the objective(s) of this proposal align with the World Bank Group’s twin goals? What are the key thematic research questions being addressed in this research? Page 2 of 24 World Bank Knowledge for Change Program – Full Proposal Templet In September 2015, the United Nations General Assembly formally adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which is expected to guide global action over the next 15 years. Consisting of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 associated targets, this new agenda builds on the achievements of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), but is far wider in scope and ambition. To monitor these 169 targets, 232 official indicators have now been selected. The implementation of the SDGs will require a solid monitoring framework and a high-quality database of indicators to inform policy and ensure accountability of stakeholders. However, different from the MDGs, the more ambitious SDGs include very diverse measures of welfare outcomes. In particular, the themes of the SDGs broadly cover “people, planet, prosperity, peace, and partnership”, and the targets associated with these themes are even more general. The World Bank is directly responsible for monitoring the progress of 20 indicators of these 232 indicators (see Table 1), and involved in the production of an extended group of 23 additional indicators. The main objective of this work is to conduct research on the 20 indicators that the Bank are currently responsible for, and to provide guidance for further improvement on data collection and analysis. We aim to improve the list of these indicators to provide a more useful assessment and monitoring tool that can better serve the Bank’s twin goals. More specifically, our proposed work aims to i) examine the 20 indicators that the Bank are currently responsible for, and investigate whether, and to what extent, these indicators can form a subset that represent the 232 indicators ii) identify a core group of indicators that can help track the progress of all the 232 indicators, which provides insights on potential changes and modifications to the 20 indicators the Bank is responsible for iii) employ relevant statistical methods to construct a complete database of this core group of indicators that enables the tracking of a country’s SDG progress over time. Our proposed research for tracking the SDGs is closely linked to the Bank’s twin goals and key operational priorities. In particular, the SDGs provide broader measures of welfare outcomes that include and place higher priority on the Bank’s twin goals. Specifically, the very first target of the first SDG goal on poverty calls for eliminating poverty by 2030 as currently defined by the $1.90 a day line (target 1.1). Moreover, the first target of the tenth SDG goal on inequality is related to the Bank’s goal of boosting shared prosperity, with the specification that the bottom 40 grow faster than the average (target 10.1). The Bank is, in fact, the organization responsible for providing estimates for these two targets. More generally, our proposed work on the SDGs is consistent with the strong focus at other international organizations, as well as at the country level, that employs the SDGs framework for policy discourses. 2. Describe analytic design & methodology. Elaborate on hypotheses, conceptual framework, data (survey design if applicable). We describe below two main activities that we propose to implement under this Grant, together with more specific research questions in this Section. Page 3 of 24 World Bank Knowledge for Change Program – Full Proposal Templet 1. Research on the Bank’s current list of SDG indicators and constructing a core group of indicators We propose to investigate a number of issues surrounding the construction of the SDG indicators in general, and the Bank’s SDG indicators in particular. Below is a brief discussion of some key issues. i. To what extent does the current Bank’s selection of indicators represent all the SDG indicators? Even though 232 indicators have now officially been selected to monitor the 169 SDG targets, tracking all these indicators presents no small challenge for both technical reasons (i.e., many indicators have missing values) and logistical reasons (i.e., it is a resources-consuming process to put together a high-quality database on this large number of indicators over time). The selection process of the 20 core indicators is based on the Bank’s expertise as well as the data that the Bank can mobilize. While this process results in a relatively more manageable database of indicators of high quality, as yet it is unclear to what extent these 20 indicators can represent all the SDG indicators. And it is also unclear which aspects of the SDGs that these indicators can better capture. Put differently, what can we say about the general progress with the SDGs if we are to look only at these 20 indicators that the Bank can update? In a bad-case scenario, if these current 20 indicators offer a biased picture of the SDGs, then how biased is this picture (e.g., too much focus on economic growth rather than the environment)? The insights into these questions will have much operational relevance to the Bank in general as a leading organization on implementing the SDG goals, and DECDG in particular as the department that coordinating with other global practices within the Bank to produce and curate data on the Bank’s list of SDG indicators.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CREATE Newsletter Issue 4, September 2009
    CREATE Newsletter Issue Four September 2009 Director’s Note: CREATE has continued to develop as its research programme produces an extensive portfolio of research papers, reports, and published journal articles. A special issue of Comparative Education was published in May 2009 focussing on access to education in Sub-Saharan Africa with Keith Lewin and Kwame Akyeampong as guest editors and fourteen contributors from CREATE. At the forthcoming UKFIET at New College, Oxford CREATE about 30 CREATE associates are presenting papers in different sessions including a CREATE Symposium on Tuesday the 14th of September. Members of the Consultative Advisory Group have been invited to the conference and some are giving papers. CREATE has been well represented over the last year at various events including the Commonwealth Ministers Conference, and the National Conference on Education in Ghana in April which was opened by the new Minister. In India the Secretary of the Department of School Education for all India has taken a personal interest in CREATE and opened a recent dissemination event in Madhya Pradesh, one of the CREATE case study areas. CREATE is also supporting the development of RMSA, the Government of India programme to expand access to secondary schools which complements the well established SSA. In South Africa achievement testing has been undertaken and the analysis of performance and silent exclusion will be included in a book. In Bangladesh data collection has continued and the task now is the consolidation of data on children, schools and communities into analytic reports that identify key issues within the CREATE Zones of exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • EFA, the Quality Imperative and the Problem of Pedagogy
    Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity Education For All, The Quality Imperative and the Problem of Pedagogy Robin Alexander CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No 20 April 2008 Institute of Education University of London The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme Consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Its purpose is to undertake research designed to improve access to basic education in developing countries. It seeks to achieve this through generating new knowledge and encouraging its application through effective communication and dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals, non-government organisations and other interested stakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledge and skill, is both a part of the definition of poverty, and a means for its diminution. Sustained access to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter- generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women, and reductions in inequality. The CREATE partners CREATE is developing its research collaboratively with partners in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The lead partner of CREATE is the Centre for International Education at the University of Sussex.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrolment Impact, Quality Effects, and the Transition to Secondary School
    Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity Free Primary Education and After in Kenya: Enrolment impact, quality effects, and the transition to secondary school Moses Oketch Anthony Somerset CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No. 37 May 2010 University of Sussex Institute of Education, Centre for International Education University of London The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme Consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Its purpose is to undertake research designed to improve access to basic education in developing countries. It seeks to achieve this through generating new knowledge and encouraging its application through effective communication and dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals, non-government organisations and other interested stakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledge and skill, is both a part of the definition of poverty, and a means for its diminution. Sustained access to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter- generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women, and reductions in inequality. The CREATE partners CREATE is developing its research collaboratively with partners in Sub-Saharan Africa
    [Show full text]
  • Human Capital, Poverty, Educational Access and Exclusion: the Case of Ghana 1991-2006
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity Human Capital, Poverty, Educational Access and Exclusion: The Case of Ghana 1991-2006 Caine Rolleston CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No. 22 January 2009 Institute of Education University of London The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme Consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Its purpose is to undertake research designed to improve access to basic education in developing countries. It seeks to achieve this through generating new knowledge and encouraging its application through effective communication and dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals, non-government organisations and other interested stakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledge and skill, is both a part of the definition of poverty, and a means for its diminution. Sustained access to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter-generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women, and reductions in inequality. The CREATE partners CREATE is developing its research collaboratively with partners in
    [Show full text]
  • Alec Ian GERSHBERG, Ph.D
    Alec Ian GERSHBERG, Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania School of Arts & Sciences/Sociology Department Mail: 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 Office: Solomon Bldg, D15, 3720 Walnut Street Ph: (215) 573-2801 Fax: (206) 600.6545 Email: [email protected] Skype: AlecGershberg Twitter: @AlecGershberg EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania, Regional Science Department Philadelphia, Pa., USA. Ph.D. awarded December 1993; M.A. Degree December 1990. Dissertation Title: "Fiscal Decentralization, Intergovernmental Relations, and Education Finance: Welfare and Efficiency Considerations in Educational Expenditures and Outcomes in Mexico" Teaching Activities: Lecturer -- Latin American Geography; Writing Fellow, university program aimed at raising the level of undergraduate writing capabilities and written work. Brown University. Providence, R.I., USA 9/82 - 5/86 B.A. degree with honors from two academic departments: 1) American Civilization Department and 2) Literature & Society Department. Selected for training as a writing instructor through Rose Writing Fellows Program. Varsity Ski Team. Honors Thesis Title: "Salvation by Technology: The first decade of Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) rhetoric." RESEARCH & TEACHING INTERESTS Education Policy, School Governance & Accountability, Political Economy of Reform, Comparative & International Education, Systems Thinking, Economics of Education, Education Finance, International Development, Human Development, , School-to-work transition, Education & Labor Markets, Immigrant Education & Immigration
    [Show full text]
  • UK Qualification Suppliers 1 1.0 Introduction 1
    Globalisation Qualifications and in collaboration with: Livelihoods University of Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe University of Colombo, Sri Lanka University of Zhejiang, PRC Report Number 19 The Supply of UK Qualifications to Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe following Economic Liberalisation Angela W Little and Jane Evans Preface This research report is one of a series completed within the DFID-funded research project ‘Globalisation, Qualifications, Livelihoods and Youth’. The research examines the impact of globalisation on livelihoods, education and qualifications, and on the aspirations of youth for education, qualifications and livelihoods. The research arises from the need to monitor the impact of globalisation – operationalised via policies of economic liberalisation – on the access of the poorest social groups to livelihoods, education and qualifications in different country contexts. Economic liberalisation is changing the nature of the livelihood structure and the economic demand for skills and qualifications. It is also changing the types of educational and qualifications provision within specific national settings. These in turn impact on the aspirations of youth for livelihoods, education and qualifications. The realisation of those aspirations is increasingly conditioned by the ability to pay, as policies of economic liberalisation encourage private sector, market driven provision, especially at the post-primary level. This research explores the impacts of economic liberalisation on the structure and volume of livelihoods, education and qualifications on the one hand, and on the aspirations of youth, on the other. In particular it seeks to explore differential impacts of economic liberalisation on members of different social groups. The fieldwork has been undertaken mainly in Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. A smaller study was undertaken in Zhejiang Province, China, and a study of UK suppliers of qualifications to Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe was undertaken to explore the interdependent, cross border nature of qualifications supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning First: a Research Agenda for Improving Learning in Low-Income Countries
    CENTER FOR UNIVERSAL EDUCATION WORKING PAPER 7 | DECEMBER 2012 Center for Universal Education at BROOKINGS LEARNING FIRST: A RESEARCH AGENDA FOR IMPROVING LEARNING IN LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES Daniel A. Wagner Katie M. Murphy Haley De Korne Center for Universal Education at BROOKINGS Daniel A. Wagner is UNESCO Chair in learning and literacy, proFessor of education, and director of the International LiteraCy Institute at the University of Pennsylvania. Katie M. Murphy is a Ph.D. stuDent in the GraDuate SChool oF EDuCation at the University of Pennsylvania. Haley De Korne is a Ph.D. stuDent in the GraDuate SChool oF EDuCation at the University of Pennsylvania. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the Center for Universal Education at Brookings and its staff for their gener- ous support throughout the project. In particular, we appreciated the advice and program management of Anda Adams, Xanthe Ackerman and Rebecca Winthrop. Additionally, Elena Matsui, Jenny Perlman Robinson, Lauren Greubel and Robin Forner provided organizational and editing support. We would also like to thank UNESCO’s Education Sector (including Qinq Tang, Mmantsetsa Marope, I. V. SubbaRao and Sue Grant-Lewis) for providing facilities and local leadership during our RTFL meeting in Paris. The present paper benefited from helpful critiques and inputs from friends and colleagues. First, we are grate- ful to two external reviewers, Christine Beggs and Luis Crouch; each provided in-depth and insightful comments that resulted in substantial improvements. We also thank
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Grade Teaching - a Review of Research and Practice - Education Research Paper No
    Multi-grade teaching - A review of research and practice - Education Research Paper No. 12, 1994, 63 p. Table of Contents Angela Little January 1995 Serial No. 12 Overseas Development Administration Table of Contents Occasional papers on education Acknowledgements Chapter 1 - Multi-grade teaching: Concept and status The persistence of the multi-grade reality towards the close of the twentieth century The gap between the multi-grade reality, teacher education and curriculum assumptions Chapter 2 - Lessons from developing countries Zambia: Teacher education and support for multi-grade schools Peru: Indigenous schools Sri Lanka: Approaching multi-grade via multi-level teaching The impact system of mass primary education Conclusion Chapter 3 - Research evidence on the effects of multi-grade teaching Cognitive outcomes Non-cognitive outcomes The costs of multi-grade Chapter 4 - Implications for the practice of multi-grade teaching and further research National level Regional/district level Teacher/classroom level Bibliography Annotated bibliography Multi-grade teaching - A review of research and practice - Education Research Paper No. 12, 1994, 63 p. [Table of Contents] [Next Page] Occasional papers on education This is one of a number of Occasional Papers issued from time to time by the Education Division of the Overseas Development Administration. Each paper represents a study or piece of commissioned research on some aspect of education and training in developing countries. Most of the studies were undertaken in order to provide informed judgements from which policy decisions could be drawn, but in each case it has become apparent that the material produced would be of interest to a wider audience, particularly but not exclusively those whose work focuses on developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Elementary Education in India Country Analytical Review
    Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online Access to Elementary Education in India Country Analytical Review R. Govinda Madhumita Bandyopadhyay July 2008 National University of Educational Planning and Administration NUEPA The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme Consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Its purpose is to undertake research designed to improve access to basic education in developing countries. It seeks to achieve this through generating new knowledge and encouraging its application through effective communication and dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals, non-government organisations and other interested stakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledge and skill, is both a part of the definition of poverty, and a means for its diminution. Sustained access to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter-generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women, and reductions in inequality. The CREATE partners CREATE is developing its research collaboratively with partners in Sub-Saharan Africa and South
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of the One Hundred Years of Growth and Development of Technical and Vocational Education Policy in Zimbabwe: 1890 - 1990
    A Critical Analysis of the One Hundred Years of Growth and Development of Technical and Vocational Education Policy in Zimbabwe: 1890 - 1990 BY Munyaradzi Alexander Zengeya A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Education in Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Adult Education University of Zimbabwe, Harare (2007) ii DEDICATION This research study is dedicated to the Zengeya family, especially my late grand parents, Sekuru Nhorito Patrick and Ambuya Mavis Manditeya; my parents Baba Tarutora Miles and Amai Jessy Mandisema; my loving wife Grace; and to my children Chipo, Beauty, Mavis, Tapiwa, Rudo, Farai, Munyaradzi, Rutendo, Tanaka and Natasha. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was carried over a period of eight years, from 1997 to 2004. Over this period, many people contributed in various ways to the final outcome of the thesis. Those that contributed are too many to mention here, but I would like to register my gratitude to a few. Let me start with my supervisors from the University of Zimbabwe. These were the late Professor C. E. M. Chikomba, Professor C. Nherera, Professor M. J. Matshazi (my former lecturer and mentor who gave me the first useful and informed guidance with the study), Dr. O. Mandebvu (who took over from Prof. Nherera and guided me in a manner that gave me a lot of confidence and vigor), Professor Angela Little of the University of London’s Institute of Education (who helped me search for information during my visit to London) and Professor O. Shumba (who played the most significant part in guiding me to produce the final thesis report).
    [Show full text]
  • Development Studies and Comparative Education: Context
    Comparative Education Volume36 No. 32000 pp. 279 –296 DevelopmentStudies and ComparativeEducation:contex t, content,comparisonand contributors ANGELA LITTLE ABSTRACT Thisarticle reviews ComparativeEducation over the past 20 years, explores the parallel literature of development studies, and identies future directions and challenges for comparative education. UsingParkyn (1977) as abenchmark, ananalysis ofarticles published between 1977 and 1998 suggests that onlya small proportion appear tomeet his criteria for comparative education. Parkyn’s purpose for comparative education, toincrease ourunderstanding of the relationship between education and the development of humansociety, is shared by development studies. Educational writingswithin development studies have explored the meanings ofdevelopment and underdevelopment and have raised importantquestions about the unitof analysis for comparative education. Several reasons are advanced toexplain the separate development of these literatures. The contemporary challenge of globalisationpresents fresh opportunities and challenges for both literatures. Ashared commitmentto understanding the role of education inthe globalisationprocess and the reasoned response toit could formthe heart of ashared effort inthe future. Globalisationalso highlights the need for more effective dialogue between comparative educators indifferent corners of the globe. Introduction The purposeof thisarticle is three-fold: to providea briefreview of the journal over the past 20yearsin terms of criteriait hasset for itself; to identify concepts whichhave emerged from Downloaded By: [informa internal users] At: 11:00 8 March 2010 development studies over the past20 yearswhich can contribute to and enhance comparative education; and to conclude with suggestions about the future development of the eld of comparativeeducation. Review ofthe Journal The benchmarkfor thisreview is Parkyn’ s (1977) contribution to the SpecialNumber, entitled ‘Comparative Education Researchand Development Education’ (Grant, 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Fosterage and Access to Schooling in Savelugu-Nanton, Ghana
    Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity Fosterage and Access to Schooling in Savelugu-Nanton, Ghana Caine Rolleston CREATE PATHWAYS TO ACCESS Research Monograph No. 59 March 2011 The Institute of Education University of London, UK The Consortium for Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE) is a Research Programme Consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). Its purpose is to undertake research designed to improve access to basic education in developing countries. It seeks to achieve this through generating new knowledge and encouraging its application through effective communication and dissemination to national and international development agencies, national governments, education and development professionals, non-government organisations and other interested stakeholders. Access to basic education lies at the heart of development. Lack of educational access, and securely acquired knowledge and skill, is both a part of the definition of poverty, and a means for its diminution. Sustained access to meaningful learning that has value is critical to long term improvements in productivity, the reduction of inter-generational cycles of poverty, demographic transition, preventive health care, the empowerment of women, and reductions in inequality. The CREATE partners CREATE is developing its research collaboratively with partners in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The lead partner of CREATE is the Centre for International Education at the University of Sussex.
    [Show full text]