DOCSLIB.ORG

Taxonomic Revision of the Pampas Cat Leopardus Colocola Complex (Carnivora: Felidae): an Integrative Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taxonomic Revision of the Pampas Cat Leopardus Colocola Complex (Carnivora: Felidae): an Integrative Approach applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 191, 575–611. With 14 figures. Taxonomic revision of the pampas cat Leopardus colocola complex (Carnivora: Felidae): an integrative approach FABIO OLIVEIRA DO NASCIMENTO1,*†, , JILONG CHENG2, , and ANDERSON FEIJÓ2,*†, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/191/2/575/5848237 by guest on 28 September 2021 1Mastozoologia, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China Received 31 December 2019; Revised 31 March 2020; accepted for publication 31 March 2020 The pampas cat Leopardus colocola has been subject to conflicting classifications over the years. Currently, one polytypic species with seven subspecies is recognized, but integrative taxonomic study for this debated group has never been done. Here, we combine the broadest morphological coverage of the pampas cat to date with molecular data and ecological niche models to clarify its species composition and test the validity of recently proposed subspecies. The multiple lines of evidence derived from morphology, molecular, biogeography and climatic niche datasets converged on the recognition of five monotypic species: L. braccatus, L. colocola, L. garleppi (including thomasi, budini, steinbachi, crespoi and wolffsohni as synonyms), L. munoai and L. pajeros (including crucina as synonym). These five species are morphologically diagnosable based on skin and skull traits, have evolved in distinct climatic niche spaces and were recovered in molecular species delimitation. Contrary to previous taxonomic arrangements, we do not recognize subspecies in pampas cats. To objectively define the two most controversial species, we designate neotypes for L. colocola and L. pajeros. The diversification of pampas cats is associated with Middle Pleistocene glaciations, but additional genetic samples from the central Andean region are still needed to conclusively reconstruct its evolutionary history. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: Andes – ocelot – open-dwellers – Pleistocene glaciations – species delimitation – subspecies. INTRODUCTION from sea level up to 5000 m (Redford & Eisenberg, 1992; García-Perea, 1994; Nowak, 1999; Sunquist & The pampas cat, Leopardus colocola (Molina, 1782), Sunquist, 2002, 2009). Phylogenetic studies show that is a South American small-sized felid (± 3 kg) pampas cats are part of the group informally known characterized by long hairs on the body, an erectile as the ‘ocelot lineage’, which corresponds to small- and spinal crest slightly darker than ground colour, medium-sized Neotropical spotted cats of the genus transverse dark stripes on the throat, markings on Leopardus Gray, 1842 (Johnson et al., 1999, 2006; the flanks, legs with transverse dark stripes in the Mattern & McLennan, 2000; Li et al., 2016; Kitchener proximal portion, ears more pointed and tail relatively et al., 2017). Pampas cats are closely related to the shorter than other South American felids and a Andean mountain cat, Leopardus jacobita (Cornalia, lingual cavity between lower canine teeth (Pocock, 1865), the oncilla or tigrina, Leopardus tigrinus 1941; Cabrera, 1958, 1961; Guggisberg, 1975; Redford (von Schreber, 1775) species group, Geoffroy’s cat, & Eisenberg, 1992; Salles, 1992; García-Perea, 1994; Leopardus geoffroyi (d’Orbigny & Gervais, 1844) and Eisenberg & Redford, 1999; Sunquist & Sunquist, the kodkod, Leopardus guigna (Molina, 1782) (Johnson 2002, 2009; Prevosti, 2006). Pampas cats are typical of & O’Brien, 1997; Johnson et al., 1999, 2006; Mattern & open areas and show a broad elevational distribution McLennan, 2000; Li et al., 2016). The taxonomic history of pampas cats started *Corresponding authors. E-mail: [email protected]; with Molina (1782) describing Felis colocola, based [email protected] on a cat from the forests of Chile (‘Boschi del Chili’). †The authors contributed equally to the present study. Since then, numerous related species and subspecies © 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 191, 575–611 575 576 F. O. DO NASCIMENTO ET AL. have been described, usually based on a single or a when Felis jacobita Cornalia, 1865 (= Leopardus few specimens: Felis pajeros Desmarest, 1816 from jacobita) was erroneously associated with the name Argentina, Felis braccata Cope, 1889 from central colocola (Philippi, 1869, 1870, 1873; Burmeister, 1879; Brazil, Felis pajeros crucina Thomas, 1901 from Lydekker 1896; Allen, 1919; Yepes, 1929; Pocock, 1941; southern Argentina, Lynchailurus pajeros garleppi Schwangart, 1941). Matschie, 1912 from Peru, Felis pajeros thomasi Throughout the 20th and early 21st centuries, a Lönnberg, 1913 from Ecuador, Lynchailurus pajeros series of taxonomic studies involving pampas cats budini Pocock, 1941 from north-western Argentina, was carried out, resulting in contrasting taxonomic Lynchailurus pajeros steinbachi Pocock, 1941 schemes (Table 1). In the most recent revision of from Bolivia, Felis (Lynchailurus) colocolo crespoi the group, García-Perea (1994), based on skull and Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/191/2/575/5848237 by guest on 28 September 2021 Cabrera, 1957 from north-western Argentina, Felis external morphological characters of 86 specimens, colocola muñoai Ximénez, 1961 from Uruguay and recognized three allopatric polytypic species: Lynchailurus colocolo wolffsohni García-Perea, 1994 Lynchailurus colocolo (including Ly. c. colocolo and from northern Chile. Ly. c. wolffsohni) distributed on the western slope of The use of the specific name colocola and its the southern Andes (northern and central Chile), derivations (colocolo, colorolla, colicollo, etc.) (Molina, Ly. pajeros (including Ly. p. pajeros, Ly. p. crucinus, 1782, 1786, 1788, 1789, 1808, 1809, 1810; Bechstein, Ly. p. budini, Ly. p. steinbachi, Ly. p. crespoi, 1800; Shaw, 1800; Fischer, 1829; Wagner, 1841) has Ly. p. garleppi and Ly. p. thomasi) distributed along the been historically debated since the late 18th century Andes, from Ecuador to southern Chile and Argentina (Cabrera, 1940, 1958, 1961; Osgood, 1943; Kitchener and Ly. braccatus (including Ly. b. braccatus and et al., 2017). The main problem started when Griffith Ly. b. munoai) found in Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. (1821) and Griffith et al. (1827) associated Molina’s This arrangement was largely followed by Wozencraft F. colocola with an unidentified specimen from (2005), but he placed the group in the genus Leopardus Guyana based on information and plates provided by and considered crespoi Cabrera, 1957 and crucina Charles Hamilton Smith, an opinion largely followed Thomas, 1901 as junior synonyms of L. p. budini in subsequent works (e.g. Fischer, 1829; Jardine, 1834; (Pocock, 1941). Later, Nascimento (2010), in his Reichenbach, 1834; Gay, 1847; Giebel, 1855; Gray, 1867; taxonomic revision of genus Leopardus, recognized six Fitzinger, 1869; Mivart, 1881; Trousseart, 1885, 1897, species for the pampas cat species complex: Le. colocolo, 1904; Elliot, 1883; Matschie, 1894, 1895), although Le. pajeros, Le. braccatus, Le. munoai, Le. garleppi rejected by others (e.g. Swainson, 1838; Wagner, and Le. budini. Recently, Kitchener et al. (2017), 1841; Gray, 1874). The confusion became even greater evaluating previous studies, recognized only one species Table 1. Main taxonomic arrangements of L. colocola since the beginning of the 20th century Authors Taxa Allen (1919) Lynchailurus pajeros pajeros, Ly. p. crucina, Ly. p. thomasi, Ly. p. thomasi, Ly. p. braccatus Cabrera (1940) Lynchailurus colocolus colocolus, Ly. c. pajeros, Ly. c. braccatus, Ly. c. crucinus, Ly. c. garleppi, Ly. c. thomasi Pocock (1941) Lynchailurus pajeros pajeros, Ly. p. huina, Ly. p. budini, Ly. p. steinbachi, Ly. p. garleppi, Ly. p. braccatus Schwangart (1941) Lynchailurus (Lynchailurus) pajeros pajeros, Ly. (Ly.) p. braccatus, Ly. (Ly.) p. garleppi Cabrera (1958) Felis (Lynchailurus) colocolo braccatus, F. (Ly.) c. budini, F. (Ly.) c. colocolo, F. (Ly.) c. crespoi, F. (Ly.) c. garleppi, F. (Ly.) c. pajeros, F. (Ly.) c. thomasi Ximénez (1961) Felis colocola colocola, F. c. braccata, F. c. budini, F. c. crespoi, F. c. garleppi, F. c. pajeros, F. c. thomasi, F. c. muñoai García-Perea (1994) Lynchailurus colocolo: Ly. c. colocolo, Ly. c. wolffsohni Lynchailurus pajeros: Ly. p. budini, Ly. p. crespoi, Ly. p. crucinus, Ly. p. garleppi, Ly. p. pajeros, Ly. p. steinbachi, Ly. p. thomasi Lynchailurus braccatus: Ly. b. braccatus, Ly. b. munoai Wozencraft (2005) Leopardus colocolo: Le. c. colocolo, Le. c. wolffsohni Leopardus pajeros: Le. p. budini, Le. p. garleppi, Le. p. pajeros, Le. p. steinbachi, Le. p. thomasi Leopardus braccatus: Le. b. braccatus, Le. b. munoai Kitchener et al. (2017) Leopardus colocola colocola, Le. c. wolffsohni, Le. c. pajeros, Le. c. budini, Le. c. garleppi, Le. c. braccatus, Le. c. munoai Present study Leopardus colocola, Le. pajeros, Le. garleppi, Le. braccatus, Le. munoai © 2020 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2021, 191, 575–611 TAXONOMY OF LEOPARDUS COLOCOLA 577 with seven subspecies: Leopardus colocola colocola, Coleção de Mamíferos, Universidade de Brasília, Le. c. wolffsohni, Le. c. pajeros (including crucina), Brasília, Brazil (UnB); Estación Biológica de Doñana, Le. c. budini (including steinbachi), Le. c. garleppi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Issue
    Current Issue Cat Project of the Month - September 2005 The IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group's website (www.catsg.org) presents each month a different cat conservation project. Members of the Cat Specialist Group are encouraged to submit a short description of interesting projects For application use this standardised form (an editable word document) Pampas cat ecology and conservation in the Brazilian grasslands The main goal of the study on pampas cats in the Brazilian grasslands is to rise information on the ecology of the species, including data on diseases, genetics and threats. Leandro Silveira, Anah T. A. Jácomo and Mariana Malzoni Furtado Leandro Silveira (photo) is a wildlife biologist (PhD). He is the project leader of the Carnovire Community Project at Emas Naitonal Park and is the president of the Jaguar Conservation Fund. Leandro has been a member of the Cat SG since 2002. Since 2003, he is conduction a study on the papas cat (Photo Jaugar Conservation Fund) [email protected] submitted: 23/09/2005 The pampas cat (Oncifelis colocolo) is widely distributed in a variety of South American habitats. It ranges from the forested Andean slopes of Ecuador, Peru and Bolívia, cloud forest in central Chile, Paraguayan chaco, open woodlands of central, western, northeastern and southern Brazil, the Argentine pampas, southern Patagonia, and the pampas of Uruguay (Cabrera 1957, Vieira, 1955; Ximenez, 1961). In Brazil it is restricted to open habitats and it is found in the Cerrado of central Brazil, the Pantanal of western Mato Grosso do Sul, and in southern open grassland and mangrove habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Oncilla 1 Oncilla
    Oncilla 1 Oncilla Tiger Cat redirects here. For the Tom and Jerry Tales episode, see Tiger Cat (Tom and Jerry Tales). Oncilla[1] Conservation status [2] Vulnerable (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Leopardus Species: L. tigrinus Binomial name Leopardus tigrinus (Schreber, 1775) Oncilla 2 Oncilla range Synonyms Oncifelis tigrinus Felis tigrina The Oncilla (Leopardus tigrinus), also known as the Little Spotted Cat, Tigrillo, Cunaguaro or Tiger Cat, is a small spotted felid found in the tropical rainforests of Central and South America. It is a close relative of the Ocelot and the Margay, and has a rich ochre coat, spotted with black rosettes. The Oncilla is a nocturnal animal that hunts rodents and birds.[3] Appearance The Oncilla resembles the Margay and the Ocelot,[4] but is smaller, with a slender build and narrower muzzle. It grows to 38 to 59 centimetres (15 to 23 in) long, plus a 20 to 42 centimetres (7.9 to 17 in) tail.[5] While this is somewhat longer than the average domestic cat, Leopardus tigrinus is generally lighter, weighing 1.5 to 3 kilograms (3.3 to 6.6 lb).[6] The fur is thick and soft, ranging from light brown to dark ochre, with numerous dark rosettes across the back and flanks. The underside is pale with dark spots and the tail is ringed. The backs of the ears are black with bold ocelli.[4] The rosettes are black or brown, open in the center, and irregularly shaped.[7] The legs have medium-sized spots tapering to smaller spots near the paws.[7] This coloration helps the oncilla blend in with the mottled sunlight of the tropical forest understory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leopardus Tigrinus Is One of the Smallest Wild Cats in South America; and the Smallest Cat in Brazil (Oliveira-Santos Et Al
    Mckenzie Brocker Conservation Biology David Stokes 20 February 2014 Leopardus Tigrinus Description: The Leopardus tigrinus is one of the smallest wild cats in South America; and the smallest cat in Brazil (Oliveira-Santos et al. 2012). L. tigrinus is roughly the size of a domestic house cat, with its weight ranging from 1.8-3.4 kg (Silva-Pereira 2010). The average body length is 710 millimeters and the cat’s tail is roughly one-third of its body length averaging 250 millimeters in length. Males tend to be slightly larger than the females (Gardner 1971). The species’ coat is of a yellowish-brown or ochre coloration patterned prominently with open rosettes (Trigo et al. 2013). Cases of melanism, or dark pigmentation, have been reported but are not as common (Oliveira-Santos et al 2012). These characteristics spots are what give the L. tigrinus its common names of little spotted cat, little tiger cat, tigrina, tigrillo, and oncilla. The names tigrillo, little tiger cat, and little spotted cat are sometimes used interchangeably with other small Neotropical cats species which can lead to confusion. The species is closely related to other feline species with overlapping habitat areas and similar colorations; namely, the ocelot, Leopardus pardalis, the margay, Leopardus weidii, Geoffroys cat, Leopardus geoffroyi, and the pampas cat, Leopardus colocolo (Trigo et al. 2013). Distribution: The L. tigrinus is reported to have a wide distribution from as far north as Costa Rica to as far south as Northern Argentina. However, its exact distribution is still under study, as there have been few reports of occurrences in Central America.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Andean Cat Distribution Beyond the Andes in Patagonia
    original contribution ANDRES NOVARO1,2, SUSAN WALKER2*, ROCIO PALACIOS1,3, SEBASTIAN DI MARTINO4, MARTIN MONTEVERDE5, SEBASTIAN CANADELL6, LORENA RIVAS1,2 AND DANIEL COSSIOS7 Endangered Andean cat distribution beyond the Andes in Patagonia The endangered Andean cat Leopardus jacobita was considered an endemic of the Andes at altitudes above 3,000 m, until it was discovered in the Andean foothills of central Argentina in 2004. We carried out surveys for Andean cats and sympatric small cats in the central Andean foothills and the adjacent Patagonian steppe, and found Andean cats outside the Andes at elevations as low as 650 m. We determined that Andean cats are widespread but rare in the northern Patagonian steppe, with a patchy distribution. Our findings suggest that the species’ distribution may follow that of its principal prey, the rock-dwelling mountain vizcacha. The Andean cat was previously believed to be distribution if it does indeed follow that of the endemic to the Andes above 3,000 m (Yensen mountain vizcacha. First, to avoid bias for par- & Seymour 2000), until an opportunistic pho- ticular habitats beyond the Andes we placed Fig. 1. Location of new records and un- tograph in 2004 produced the startling finding a 2 x 2 km grid over the area with ArcGIS. confirmed reports of Andean cats in Men- of two Andean cats at only 1,800 m, in the We selected 105 grid cells, using stratified doza and Neuquén provinces (black dots), Andean foothills of central Argentina (Sorli et random sampling to ensure broad geographic relative to previous known distribution in al.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) Inferred
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. 1 Manuscript for review in PLOS One 2 3 Evolutionary history of Carnivora (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria) inferred 4 from mitochondrial genomes 5 6 Alexandre Hassanin1*, Géraldine Véron1, Anne Ropiquet2, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren3, 7 Alexis Lécu4, Steven M. Goodman5, Jibran Haider1,6,7, Trung Thanh Nguyen1 8 9 1 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Sorbonne Université, 10 MNHN, CNRS, EPHE, UA, Paris. 11 12 2 Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, 13 United Kingdom. 14 15 3 Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, Department of Zoology, 16 University of Johannesburg, South Africa. 17 18 4 Parc zoologique de Paris, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. 19 20 5 Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA. 21 22 6 Department of Wildlife Management, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University 23 Rawalpindi, Pakistan. 24 25 7 Forest Parks & Wildlife Department Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. 26 27 28 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.326090; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work.
    [Show full text]
  • Emas NP – Brazil
    Emas NP – Brazil 31 july – 05 August 2019 Introduction I visited Emas NP in Brazil as a part of a bigger South America trip mainly for the chance of Pampas cat and Maned wolf. I am not a fan of baited animals so Caraca´s sanctuary and their famous church was out of question for Maned wolf for me. I wanted to see them in their right environment. Real stuff. I was really hoping for some daytime sightings of them as well and Emas NP seemed like the right place for me. An odd chance of Pampas cat didn´t make my decision very hard. I stayed 5 nights in the lovely Pousada Do Gloria https://pousadadogloria.wixsite.com/parquenacionalemas I can´t recommend this place high enough. Such a friendly place and with direct proximity to the park itself. Very nice food and also a bunch of wildlife just outside your door. I did all of my drives inside the park. In general between 06:00 - 12:00 and 15:30 – 20:30 The pousada has their own “safari car” which I used solely with my driver and guide Ana who is also manager of the Pousada. She is a very good guide and have been in this park for 10 years. She knows it better than anyone else. Pousada Do Gloria doesn´t look much from the outside but it´s a lovely place. One of the places in the world you are truly missing when you leave. Clean, fresh rooms, WiFi and all the comfort you need.
    [Show full text]
  • Flat Headed Cat Andean Mountain Cat Discover the World's 33 Small
    Meet the Small Cats Discover the world’s 33 small cat species, found on 5 of the globe’s 7 continents. AMERICAS Weight Diet AFRICA Weight Diet 4kg; 8 lbs Andean Mountain Cat African Golden Cat 6-16 kg; 13-35 lbs Leopardus jacobita (single male) Caracal aurata Bobcat 4-18 kg; 9-39 lbs African Wildcat 2-7 kg; 4-15 lbs Lynx rufus Felis lybica Canadian Lynx 5-17 kg; 11-37 lbs Black Footed Cat 1-2 kg; 2-4 lbs Lynx canadensis Felis nigripes Georoys' Cat 3-7 kg; 7-15 lbs Caracal 7-26 kg; 16-57 lbs Leopardus georoyi Caracal caracal Güiña 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Sand Cat 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Leopardus guigna Felis margarita Jaguarundi 4-7 kg; 9-15 lbs Serval 6-18 kg; 13-39 lbs Herpailurus yagouaroundi Leptailurus serval Margay 3-4 kg; 7-9 lbs Leopardus wiedii EUROPE Weight Diet Ocelot 7-18 kg; 16-39 lbs Leopardus pardalis Eurasian Lynx 13-29 kg; 29-64 lbs Lynx lynx Oncilla 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Leopardus tigrinus European Wildcat 2-7 kg; 4-15 lbs Felis silvestris Pampas Cat 2-3 kg; 4-6 lbs Leopardus colocola Iberian Lynx 9-15 kg; 20-33 lbs Lynx pardinus Southern Tigrina 1-3 kg; 2-6 lbs Leopardus guttulus ASIA Weight Diet Weight Diet Asian Golden Cat 9-15 kg; 20-33 lbs Leopard Cat 1-7 kg; 2-15 lbs Catopuma temminckii Prionailurus bengalensis 2 kg; 4 lbs Bornean Bay Cat Marbled Cat 3-5 kg; 7-11 lbs Pardofelis badia (emaciated female) Pardofelis marmorata Chinese Mountain Cat 7-9 kg; 16-19 lbs Pallas's Cat 3-5 kg; 7-11 lbs Felis bieti Otocolobus manul Fishing Cat 6-16 kg; 14-35 lbs Rusty-Spotted Cat 1-2 kg; 2-4 lbs Prionailurus viverrinus Prionailurus rubiginosus Flat
    [Show full text]
  • Leopardus Pajeros)
    Jason Sweeney February 19, 2014 BBIO 485 Conservation Biology The Pampas Cat (Leopardus pajeros) Species Introduction: The Pampas cat (Leopardus pajeros) is a small feline found throughout many regions of South America. If the Pampas cat is being grouped together with other cats as a subspecies of Leopardus colocolo then the Pampas cat is found in almost all of South America. When the Pampas cat is classified as its own species then the range shrinks dramatically to mostly the eastern slopes of the Andes. Researchers have had a great deal of difficulty categorizing the species since it was first described in the early 1800s, and has belonged to a variety of different genera, as well as grouped or separated from other cat species in South America. (Garcia-Perea, 1994). The history of the Pampas cat’s classification has been long and confusing. Even to this day confusion on classification still exists. The Pampas Cat has been split into its own species (Leopardus pajeros), with several of its own subspecies, but many still consider it as a subspecies of the species L. colocolo. When grouped into the species of L. colocolo the group of cats, Pampas cat (L. pajeros), the Pantanal cat (Leopardus braccatus) of Brazil and the actual colocolo cat are all referred to as a group as the Pampas cat (Garcia-Perea, 1994) adding to the confusion when trying to gain information or classifying any of the group. The Pampas cat was split from this group due to differences in color of their fur and cranial sizes, a split which is not supported by genetic research (Garcia-Perea, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • I METHODS of NICHE PARTITIONING BETWEEN
    METHODS OF NICHE PARTITIONING BETWEEN ECUADORIAN CARNIVORES AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE MARGAY ( LEOPARDUS WIEDII ) Anne-Marie C. Hodge A Thesis Submitted to the University of North Carolina Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Biology and Marine Biology University of North Carolina Wilmington 2012 Approved By: Advisory Committee Travis Knowles Steven Emslie Marcel van Tuinen Brian Arbogast Chair Accepted by Dean, Graduate School i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION .................................................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii CHAPTER 1: MARGAY ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND DENSITY............................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Methods................................................................................................................................5 Study Location .........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Return of a Lost Structure in the Evolution of Felid Dentition Revisited: a Devoevo Perspective on the Irreversibility of Evolution
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.04.429820; this version posted February 5, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. RUNNING HEAD: LYNX M2 AND IRREVERSIBILE EVOLUTION Return of a lost structure in the evolution of felid dentition revisited: A DevoEvo perspective on the irreversibility of evolution Vincent J. Lynch Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 551 Cooke Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA. Correspondence: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.04.429820; this version posted February 5, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. RUNNING HEAD: LYNX M2 AND IRREVERSIBILE EVOLUTION Abstract There is a longstanding interest in whether the loss of complex characters is reversible (so-called “Dollo’s law”). Reevolution has been suggested for numerous traits but among the first was Kurtén (1963), who proposed that the presence of the second lower molar (M2) of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) was a violation of Dollo’s law because all other Felids lack M2. While an early and often cited example for the reevolution of a complex trait, Kurtén (1963) and Werdelin (1987) used an ad hoc parsimony argument to support their proposition that M2 reevolved in Eurasian lynx. Here I revisit the evidence that M2 reevolved in Eurasian lynx using explicit parsimony and maximum likelihood models of character evolution and find strong evidence that Kurtén (1963) and Werdelin (1987) were correct – M2 reevolved in Eurasian lynx.
    [Show full text]
  • Pampas Cat 1 Pampas Cat
    Pampas Cat 1 Pampas Cat Pampas Cat[1] Conservation status Not evaluated (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Leopardus Species: L. pajeros Binomial name Leopardus pajeros (Desmarest, 1816) crude range map The Pampas Cat (Leopardus pajeros) is a small feline from Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador,[1] and possibly far southwestern Colombia.[2] It is named after the Pampas, but occurs in grassland, shrubland, and dry forest at elevations up to 5000 metres (16000 ft).[3] It has traditionally been included in the Colocolo (L. colocolo), but was split primarily based on differences in pelage colour/pattern and cranial measurements.[3] The split is not supported by genetic work,[4] [5] leading some authorities to maintain it as a subspecies of the Colocolo.[2] [6] Confusingly, when the Colocolo includes the Pampas Cat and Pampas Cat 2 Pantanal Cat as subspecies, the "combined" species is sometimes referred to as the Pampas Cat.[7] Pampas cats have not been studied much in the wild and little is known about their hunting habits. There have been reports of the cat hunting rodents and birds at night, and also hunting domestic poultry near farms. Subspecies In 2005, Mammal Species of the World recognised 5 subspecies of the Pampas Cat:[1] • Leopardus pajeros pajeros (nominate) – southern Chile and widely in Argentina.[6] • Leopardus pajeros crespoi – eastern slope of the Andes in northwestern Argentina.[3] • Leopardus pajeros garleppi – Andes in Peru.[3] • Leopardus pajeros steinbachi – Andes in Bolivia.[3] • Leopardus pajeros thomasi – Andes in Ecuador.[3] Based on two specimens of the subspecies steinbachi, it is larger and paler than garleppi.
    [Show full text]
  • Cats on the 2009 Red List of Threatened Species
    ISSN 1027-2992 CATnewsN° 51 | AUTUMN 2009 01 IUCNThe WorldCATnews Conservation 51Union Autumn 2009 news from around the world KRISTIN NOWELL1 Cats on the 2009 Red List of Threatened Species The IUCN Red List is the most authoritative lists participating in the assessment pro- global index to biodiversity status and is the cess. Distribution maps were updated and flagship product of the IUCN Species Survi- for the first time are being included on the val Commission and its supporting partners. Red List website (www.iucnredlist.org). Tex- As part of a recent multi-year effort to re- tual species accounts were also completely assess all mammalian species, the family re-written. A number of subspecies have Felidae was comprehensively re-evaluated been included, although a comprehensive in 2007-2008. A workshop was held at the evaluation was not possible (Nowell et al Oxford Felid Biology and Conservation Con- 2007). The 2008 Red List was launched at The fishing cat is one of the two species ference (Nowell et al. 2007), and follow-up IUCN’s World Conservation Congress in Bar- that had to be uplisted to Endangered by email with others led to over 70 specia- celona, Spain, and since then small changes (Photo A. Sliwa). Table 1. Felid species on the 2009 Red List. CATEGORY Common name Scientific name Criteria CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR) Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus C2a(i) ENDANGERED (EN) Andean cat Leopardus jacobita C2a(i) Tiger Panthera tigris A2bcd, A4bcd, C1, C2a(i) Snow leopard Panthera uncia C1 Borneo bay cat Pardofelis badia C1 Flat-headed
    [Show full text]