DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Private Enforcement of State Aid Rules by National Courts in the EEA EFTA States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Private Enforcement of State Aid Rules by National Courts in the EEA EFTA States Study on private enforcement of state aid rules by national courts in the EEA EFTA States July 2019 EFTA Surveillance Authority Study on private enforcement of state aid rules by national courts in the EEA EFTA States The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the EFTA Surveillance Authority (“ESA”). ESA does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither ESA nor any person acting on ESA’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Table of contents Table of EU and EEA relevant abbreviations 3 Abstract 4 1 Introduction and context 5 1.1 Background – EEA rules on state aid and the role of national courts 5 1.2 The scope, structure and objective of the present study 6 2 Main findings on the EEA EFTA States level 7 3 Enforcement of the standstill obligation 10 3.1 The EEA EFTA States’ legal framework for private enforcement 10 3.2 Private enforcement of the standstill obligation in the EEA EFTA States 12 4 Recovery of unlawful state aid 13 4.1 The EEA EFTA States’ legal framework for recovery of unlawful state aid 13 4.2 Recovery of unlawful state aid in the EEA EFTA States 14 5 Obstacles to private enforcement of state aid rules 16 5.1 Legal framework 16 5.2 The application of the notion of state aid 17 5.3 Small number of private enforcement cases 17 6 Cooperation with ESA and the enforcement guidelines 18 7 Best practices 19 8 Conclusions and recommendations 20 CHAPTER 1: ICELAND 1 Executive summary 22 2 Methodology 22 3 The legal system of Iceland and availability of judicial relief 23 3.1 Introduction 23 3.2 Legal framework relating to state aid law 23 3.3 Consequences of unlawful state aid 24 3.4 Competent courts and powers held by Icelandic courts relating to state aid law 25 4 Procedures concerning the recovery of unlawful state aid 28 4.1 National procedures for the recovery of unlawful state aid where ESA has taken a negative decision 28 4.2 National procedures for the recovery of unlawful state aid where ESA has not taken a negative decision, e.g. where state aid is implemented in breach of the standstill obligation 28 4.3 Possible actions for contesting the validity of the recovery decisions, or in case no recovery is ordered 29 5 Summary of conclusions drawn from the cases below and the interviews 30 5.1 Introduction and overview of findings 30 5.2 Enforcement of standstill obligation and of recovery of unlawful state aid 31 5.3 The use of the ESA’s guidelines on enforcement of state aid law by national courts 32 5.4 Obstacles/difficulties regarding private enforcement of state aid law 32 5.5 Cooperation with ESA 33 5.6 Best practice 33 5.7 Conclusions and recommendations 33 CHAPTER 2: LIECHTENSTEIN 1 Executive summary 34 2 Methodology 35 3 Liechtenstein’s legal system and availability of judicial relief 36 3.1 Direct applicability of the EEA Agreement 36 3.2 Competent courts and powers held by Liechtenstein’s courts relating to state aid law 38 4 Procedures concerning recovery of unlawful state aid 43 4.1 General 43 4.2 Recovery under administrative law 44 4.3 Recovery under civil law 45 4.4 Possible actions for contesting validity of a recovery order or if no recovery is ordered 45 4.5 Enforcement of the recovery order 45 5 Conclusions drawn from cases practice and the interviews 46 1 5.1 Introduction and overview of findings 46 5.2 Enforcement of the standstill obligation and of recovery of unlawful state aid 47 5.3 Use of ESA’s guidelines on enforcement of state aid law by national courts 47 5.4 Obstacles and difficulties regarding private enforcement of state aid law 47 5.5 Cooperation with ESA 48 5.6 Best practice 48 5.7 Conclusions and recommendations 48 CHAPTER 3: NORWAY 1 Executive summary 51 2 Methodology 52 2.1 Introduction 52 2.2 Legal research 52 2.3 Questionnaire 52 3 Norway’s legal system and availability of judicial relief 53 3.1 Introduction 53 3.2 Legal framework relating to state aid law 53 3.3 Consequences of unlawful state aid 54 3.4 Competent courts and powers held by Norwegian courts relating to state aid law 54 4 Procedures concerning the recovery of unlawful state aid 56 4.1 National procedures for the recovery of unlawful state aid where ESA has taken a negative decision 56 4.2 National procedures for the recovery of unlawful state aid where ESA has not taken a negative decision, e.g. where state aid is implemented in breach of the standstill obligation 60 4.3 Possible actions for contesting the validity of the recovery decisions, or in case no recovery is ordered 60 5 Main findings of the study 62 5.1 Introduction and overview of findings 62 5.2 Difficulties with the interpretation and application of the notion of state aid 65 5.3 Cooperation with ESA 66 5.4 Enforcement of the standstill obligation 66 5.5 Enforcement of recovery 68 5.6 Best practices 70 5.7 Conclusions and recommendations 71 ANNEXES 73 Iceland Annexes Liechtenstein Annexes Norway Annexes 2 Table of EU and EEA relevant abbreviations CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union EC European community EEA European Economic Area EEA Agreement Agreement on the European Economic Area, OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, pp. 3-522 EEC European Economic Community EEC Treaty Treaty establishing the European Economic Community ESA EFTA Surveillance Authority EU European Union GBER The Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty, OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1–78, EEA Supplement No 71, 27.11.2014, p. 61 OJ Official Journal of the European Union Protocol 3 SCA Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement, as amended by the Agreements amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (SCA), signed in Brussels on 21.3.1994, 6.3.1998 and 10.12.2001 SCA Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice, OJ L 344, 31.12.1994, pp. 1-8 TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 202, 7.6.2016, p. 1–388 3 Abstract The present Study aims to give an overview of private enforcement of state aid rules by national courts in the EEA EFTA States since the entry into force of the EEA Agreement 25 years ago. The findings of the Study are based on relevant cases identified in the three EEA EFTA States, as well as information from state aid practitioners and judges in the EEA EFTA States. The Study revealed that there have been rather few private enforcement cases in each of the EEA EFTA States since the entry into force of the EEA Agreement. The Study identified 45 judgments of varying relevance from the EEA EFTA States. Of these, six concern the private enforcement of the standstill obligation and two concern the recovery of unlawful state aid based on a negative decision with recovery from ESA. The Study identified one ruling in which the plaintiff succeeded in its claim that the standstill obligation had been breached. The Study did not identify any case where the national court had initiated the cooperation procedure pursuant to ESA’s Enforcement Guidelines. The Study also revealed that the national legal frameworks implementing the standstill and recovery obligations under the Surveillance and Court Agreement are rather unclear. The degree of ambiguity varies between the EEA EFTA States. Moreover, it found that the knowledge about state aid rules amongst practitioners and judges seems to be rather low. These factors, including the lack of case law, could be mutually reinforcing elements explaining the lack of private enforcement. In order to facilitate private enforcement in the EEA EFTA States going forward, the Study considers that an amendment of the national legal frameworks for state aid in all three EEA EFTA States would be useful. ESA could also consider contributing to increased knowledge about state aid law in the EEA EFTA States, for example by offering training to national judges. 4 EEA EFTA wide conclusions 1 Introduction and context 1.1 Background – EEA rules on state aid and the role of national courts The EEA Agreement entered into force 25 years ago. For the EEA EFTA States,1 this implied inter alia that they since have had to adhere to the state aid rules in the EEA Agreement.2 The state aid rules in the EEA Agreement mirror those of the EU Treaties in substance. However, in terms of state aid procedure, it is the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘ESA’) that has the exclusive right to declare state aid compatible with Article 61(2) or (3) of the EEA Agreement, not the European Commission (the ‘Commission’). While only ESA can approve state aid, national courts also have an important role to play as regards the enforcement of state aid rules. According to established jurisprudence of the European Courts, national courts’ responsibilities pertain mainly to two types of situations: (i) the private enforcement of the standstill obligation, and (ii) recovery of unlawful aid.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Rule of Law Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2014 Rule of Law Report Legal Certainty, Judicial Review, Appointment of Justices, Corruption Prevention SGI 2014 | 2 Rule of Law Report Indicator Legal Certainty Question To what extent do government and administration act on the basis of and in accordance with legal provisions to provide legal certainty? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = Government and administration act predictably, on the basis of and in accordance with legal provisions. Legal regulations are consistent and transparent, ensuring legal certainty. 8-6 = Government and administration rarely make unpredictable decisions. Legal regulations are consistent, but leave a large scope of discretion to the government or administration. 5-3 = Government and administration sometimes make unpredictable decisions that go beyond given legal bases or do not conform to existing legal regulations. Some legal regulations are inconsistent and contradictory. 2-1 = Government and administration often make unpredictable decisions that lack a legal basis or ignore existing legal regulations. Legal regulations are inconsistent, full of loopholes and contradict each other. Estonia Score 10 The rule of law is fundamental to Estonian government and administration. In the period of transition from communism to liberal democracy, most of the legal acts and regulations had to be amended or introduced for the first time. Joining the European Union in 2004 caused another major wave of legal reforms. These fast and radical changes, which occurred in a short timespan, caused some inconsistencies and unexpected legal amendments (for example the increase of the VAT in 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Monica Viken 160220
    Denne fil er hentet fra Handelshøyskolen BIs åpne institusjonelle arkiv BI Brage http://brage.bibsys.no/bi Franchising in Norway: balancing complexity in a contractual relationship Monica Viken Handelshøyskolen BI Dette er siste forfatterversjon av artikkelen etter fagfellevurdering, før publisering i JFT: Tidskrift utgiven av Juridiska Föreningen i Finland, 152(2016)3: 338-365 Tidsskriftets forlag, Juridiska Föreningen i Finland, tillater at siste forfatterversjon legges i åpent publiseringsarkiv ved den institusjon forfatteren tilhører. http://jff.fi/ 1 Franchising in Norway – Balancing Complexity in a Contractual Relationship1 Associate Professor Ph.D Monica Viken 1. Introduction 1.1 Background and context The first known organized chain in Norway operating as a franchise is said to be a textile wholesale chain, established in 1966.2 The term “franchise” was not used, but the system matched the description of a franchise system. Franchising can be described as a commercial development strategy based on an interdependent partnership between independent commercial entities: the franchisor and franchisees.3 This partnership is typically based on the transfer of a package of intellectual property rights relating to trademarks, trade names, shop signs, utility models, designs, copyrights, know-how or patents, to be exploited for the resale of goods or the provision of services to end users.4 The number of franchise systems, as organisational forms, increased in Norway during the 1970´s, with 183 systems operating as franchises by 1998.5 The number is still increasing, with an estimated 242 franchise systems in 2004 and 300 systems in 2016.6 Within the retail industry one third of local units are owned or hired by a franchisee.7 As a result of this growth, 1 The author wishes to thank Petra Sund-Norrgård, Stojan Arnerstål and René Franz Henschel for their valuable feedback and comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2011 annual report 2011 Contents Foreword 3 Organization and Staffing 4-5 Deprivation of Position by Court Judgment 6-7 Documenting Decisions in Criminal Cases 8-9 Police Corruption in Norway 10-11 The Conduct of Police Employees 12-13 The Use of Police Signature in Private Contexts 14-15 Incidents during Detention 16-17 Statistics 18-21 Decisions to Prosecute in 2011 22-25 Emergency Turn-Outs in 2011 26-27 Administrative Assessments in 2011 28-31 Court cases in 2011 32-35 Meetings and Lectures in 2011 36-37 The Norwegian Bureau for the Investigation of Police Affairs 38 Articles from Previous Annual Reports 39 annual report Copy Print Photo / Norwegian Bureau for the / PJ-trykk, Oslo / Frank Holm, Alelier Klingwall Investigation of Police Affairs / Cornelius Poppe, Berit Roald, ScanpiX Illustrations / Politiforum Design / layout / Harald Nygård / Getty Images / Newmarketing AS / Geir Hansen Foreword The purpose of the Annual Reports from the Bureau is, in addition to presenting statistical data, to point to opportunities for learning through experience. This year’s report focuses, among other things, on police detention. he Bureau has forwarded 220 cases that decisions regarding measures taken dur- the Bureau was maintained by the Director of to administrative assessment since its ing detention are not sufficiently documented. Public Prosecution. Testablishment on 1 January 2005. Typi- cally these cases have not resulted in punitive Despite the fact that the number of cases is One of the objectives of creating of the Bureau reactions, but the investigation has revealed a relatively small compared to the number of was to strengthen the public’s confidence in need for an improvement of routines.
    [Show full text]
  • USA -V- Julian Assange Judgment
    JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) Vanessa Baraitser In the Westminster Magistrates’ Court Between: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Requesting State -v- JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE Requested Person INDEX Page A. Introduction 2 a. The Request 2 b. Procedural History (US) 3 c. Procedural History (UK) 4 B. The Conduct 5 a. Second Superseding Indictment 5 b. Alleged Conduct 9 c. The Evidence 15 C. Issues Raised 15 D. The US-UK Treaty 16 E. Initial Stages of the Extradition Hearing 25 a. Section 78(2) 25 b. Section 78(4) 26 I. Section 78(4)(a) 26 II. Section 78(4)(b) 26 i. Section 137(3)(a): The Conduct 27 ii. Section 137(3)(b): Dual Criminality 27 1 The first strand (count 2) 33 The second strand (counts 3-14,1,18) and Article 10 34 The third strand (counts 15-17, 1) and Article 10 43 The right to truth/ Necessity 50 iii. Section 137(3)(c): maximum sentence requirement 53 F. Bars to Extradition 53 a. Section 81 (Extraneous Considerations) 53 I. Section 81(a) 55 II. Section 81(b) 69 b. Section 82 (Passage of Time) 71 G. Human Rights 76 a. Article 6 84 b. Article 7 82 c. Article 10 88 H. Health – Section 91 92 a. Prison Conditions 93 I. Pre-Trial 93 II. Post-Trial 98 b. Psychiatric Evidence 101 I. The defence medical evidence 101 II. The US medical evidence 105 III. Findings on the medical evidence 108 c. The Turner Criteria 111 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004 Page 6
    Annual Report IN 2004 WE DID IT WITH PURPOSE WILLP OWER What separates one bank from another? Interest rates, fees and products are often the same. But have you ever asked your bank what they want? Or what role they want to play? Our answer is simple. The objective of SpareBank 1 SR-Bank is to help create values for the region we are part of. Building a society is a everybody’s responsibility. In our region there are plenty of people that want to shoulder their share of work. The community spirit is more than a grand word. It is our philosophy. Everything we build, we build with a purpose. In January the moulds were ready page 12 In February they were picked as the country’s best youth-run business page 14 In March, RPT Production started bending page 16 In April, the network grew page 70 In May, Stavanger got a new stadium page 72 I J h t t d th ti hi Table of contents Page Page The SpareBank 1 SR-Bank Group 6 Primary capital certificates 63 Highlights 8 Key figures from the past five years 66 Principal figures 9 Value added statement 68 Key figures 9 Corporate governance 76 The Managing Director’s article 10 Risk and funds management The Annual Report 2004 18 in SpareBank 1 SR-Bank 81 Annual Accounts, table of contents 29 Overview of our offices 85 Profit and loss account 30 The business market division 90 Balance sheet 31 The private market division 93 Cash flow analysis 32 Our subsidiaries 100 Accounting principles 33 Human capital 102 Notes to the accounts 36 Organisational chart 108 The Auditor’s Report for 2004 62 Governing bodies
    [Show full text]
  • Color-Group-AS-Annual-Report-2018
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT Principal figures and key figures Color Group Annual Report 2018 Color Group Annual Report 2018 Principal figures and key figures Principal figures and key figures Color Group AS IFRS Color Line’s vision is to be CONSOLIDATED 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2018 DEVELOPMENT IN TRAFFIC Europe’s best cruise and Passengers 3 780 748 3 805 023 3 850 947 3 860 663 3 957 407 Cars 927 640 918 081 913 676 919 697 939 821 Freight units (12 m-equivalents) 182 632 180 480 175 680 169 335 165 773 passenger ferry company. Number of sailings 6 123 6 095 6 157 6 031 6 113 INCOME STATEMENT (in NOK mill.) 1) (in EUR mill.) Operating revenues 5 141 4 968 4 896 4 587 4 594 517 Operating expenses –3 924 -3 788 -3 747 –3 753 –3 859 –395 Operating profit before depreciation, amortisation, charter and leasing costs 1 217 1 180 1 149 833 735 122 Ordinary depreciation and amortisation –371 -336 -319 –343 –345 –37 Other exceptional items –5 –39 Charter, leasing costs –160 -213 -214 –208 –202 –16 Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) 686 630 616 277 149 69 Net financial items –161 -190 -101 –145 –285 –16 Pre-tax income 525 440 516 132 –136 53 Tax expenses –85 -68 -89 23 37 –9 Net profit/loss for the year 439 372 426 155 –99 44 BALANCE SHEET (in NOK mill.) Current assets 2 094 1 504 1 837 1 625 1 548 211 Non–current assets 6 473 5 704 5 641 5 896 6 055 651 Total assets 8 567 7 208 7 478 7 522 7 603 862 Current liabilities 1 900 1 071 1 488 2 123 1 672 191 Non–current liabilities 3 898 3 166 3 087 3 027 3 629 392 Liabilities 704 781 817 735 799 71 Equity 2 065 2 190 2 087 1 637 1 502 208 Total liabilities and equity 8 567 7 208 7 478 7 522 7 603 862 LIQUIDITY (in NOK mill.)/FINANCIAL STRENGTH (%) Cash and cash equivalents as at 31 Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Þingvellir National Park
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1152.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Þingvellir National Park DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: ICELAND CRITERIA: C (iii) (vi) CL DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (iii): The Althing and its hinterland, the Þingvellir National Park, represent, through the remains of the assembly ground, the booths for those who attended, and through landscape evidence of settlement extending back possibly to the time the assembly was established, a unique reflection of mediaeval Norse/Germanic culture and one that persisted in essence from its foundation in 980 AD until the 18th century. Criterion (vi): Pride in the strong association of the Althing to mediaeval Germanic/Norse governance, known through the 12th century Icelandic sagas, and reinforced during the fight for independence in the 19th century, have, together with the powerful natural setting of the assembly grounds, given the site iconic status as a shrine for the national. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Þingvellir (Thingvellir) is the National Park where the Althing - an open-air assembly, which represented the whole of Iceland - was established in 930 and continued to meet until 1798. Over two weeks a year, the assembly set laws - seen as a covenant between free men - and settled disputes. The Althing has deep historical and symbolic associations for the people of Iceland. Located on an active volcanic site, the property includes the Þingvellir National Park and the remains of the Althing itself: fragments of around 50 booths built of turf and stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015 Contents
    SUPREME COURT OF NORWAY SUPREME COURT ANNUAL REPORT 2015 CONTENTS CONTENTS The Supreme Court in its bicentenary year 2015 Page 4 Summary of Supreme Court cases and procedure Page 6 The Supreme Court’s Bicentenary Page 7 - “HONOURABLE GENTLEMEN!” Page 8 - 200 years in two minutes – It began in a library Page 10 - The Bicentenary Meeting Page 12 Bicentenary celebration at Akershus castle Page 14 Open house in the Supreme Court Page 16 Justice Tjomsland captivates his audience Page 18 “The most difficult thing I have ever done as a researcher” Page 20 A powerful meeting with the lions Page 21 Law Truth Justice Page 22 Supreme Court commemorative stamp Page 23 A selection of cases from 2015 Page 24 The Supreme Court and International Law Page 29 Supreme Court Justices Page 31 Justice Liv Gjølstad looks back Page 33 The Supreme Court's administration Page 36 Rizwana Yedicam informs Page 41 New faces Page 42 County tour 2015 Page 43 Outside the courtroom Page 44 Statistics Page 46 Cover page: The Justice Building in Christiania 1903, which is now the Supreme Court Building. Photo: Unknown photographer Oslo Museum 2 3 Photo: Morten Brakestad SUPREME COURT SUPREME THE SUPREME COURT IN ITS BICENTENARY YEAR Under the Norwegian Constitution of 1814, the entertainment, etc. outside the building. year, judiciary service has carried on as usual, and Supreme Court is one of our three constitutional The event attracted an enthusiastic crowd. You can as such, 2015 has been a busy year with many bodies. However, it took time to establish a read more about the various events in the important cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Awaiting Breivik's Verdict
    (Periodicals postage paid in Seattle, WA) TIME-DATED MATERIAL — DO NOT DELAY Taste of Norway Roots & Connections Sound Spirits Barneblad: Aquavit: Gode venner er engler som løfter Fun with balloons oss opp igjen når våre vinger har That’s the spirit! glemt hvordan det er å fly. for kids of all ages Read more on page 8 – Nils Bredesen Read more on page 10 Norwegian American Weekly Vol. 123 No. 26 June 29, 2012 Established May 17, 1889 • Formerly Western Viking and Nordisk Tidende $1.50 per copy Norway.com News Find more at www.norway.com Awaiting Breivik’s verdict News The recent Oil Fund move to July 22 trial ends buy property based from tax haven Luxembourg is under fire after 10 weeks from Norwegian-born French corruption hunter Eva Joly. “I of emotionally cannot understand how it’s pos- charged sible to set up a branch of the Oil Fund in a tax haven. It should testimonies be prohibited,” said a shocked Joly to Klassekampen. NOK STAFF COMPILATION 6.6 billion (almost USD 1.1 Norwegian American Weekly billion) was invested in compa- nies registered in tax havens the “The funeral gave me moti- Cayman Islands, Jersey, Guern- sey, and Luxembourg last year. vation. The multicultural Norway Answering Eva Joly’s censure, I’m so proud of. It showed that he Labor (Ap) Deputy Minister of failed. And we must be proud of it. Finance Hilde Singsaas stated Bano did not die in vain. She died there is nothing unusual about for the multicultural Norway.” establishing a property fund in Lara Rashid was one of the Luxembourg when investing in five witnesses to testify on the last more than one country.
    [Show full text]
  • European Employment Law Cases
    European Employment Law Cases 2016 | 2 BELGIUM Court bans headscarf ban DENMARK Dismissing employee with disabled child not discriminatory UK Claimant must also show why ‘discriminatory’ practice is detrimental AUSTRIA May salary ladder be less steep at start of career? OM_EELC_2016_02.indd 1-2 25-7-2016 15:29:25 EELC Publisher List of national correspondents European Employment Law Cases (EELC) is a legal journal that is pub- Eleven International Publishing, Kanonstraat 4-IV, Country Name Website lished four times per year. Its principal aim is to publish judgments by P.O. Box 85576, 2508 CG The Hague, Austria Andreas Tinhofer, MOSATI Rechts anwälte www.mosati.at national courts in Europe that are likely to be of interest to legal prac- e-mail [email protected], website www.elevenpub.com. Belgium Chris van Olmen, Van Olmen & Wynant www.vow.be titioners in other European countries. To this end, EELC has a national Bulgaria Kalina Tchakarova, Djingov, Gouginski, Kyutchukov & Velichkov www.dgkv.com correspondent in almost every country within the EU (plus Norway), Subscriptions Croatia Dina Vlahov, Schoenherr Attorneys at Law www.schoenherr.eu who alerts the Editorial Board to such judgments within his or her own European Employment Law Cases is published quarterly. Annual sub- Cyprus George Z. Georgiou, Georgiou & Associates www.georgezgeorgiou.com jurisdiction. A case report describes the facts of the case and the main scription rates for 2016 are € 240 (print and online). A special subscrip- Czech Republic Nataša Randlová, Randl Partners www.randls.com aspects of the judgment. It also includes a Commentary by the author tion price for 2016 is available for EELA members.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010 AF Group Annual Report Company
    Highlights 2010 annual reportAF Group 2010 Record profit The AF Group ended its 2010 anniversary year with the highest annual net profit in the history of the AF Group annual reportAF Group 2010 company. Profit before tax for 2010 was NOK 372 million, corresponding to a profit margin of 6.4 per cent. While the outlook for the five business areas varies, overall the AF Group is well positioned for the future from both an organisational and financial standpoint. Financially sound position At the end of 2010 AF had NOK 580 million in net interest-bearing receivables and an equity ratio of 32.1 per cent. Thanks to the sale of parts of the Environ- mental Base at Vats and profits from operations AF is financially strong and well equipped to meet opportunities and challenges in the time to come. High activity and good performance in Civil Engineering AF’s Civil Engineering business area reported its highest level of activity and earnings ever in 2010. Revenues in 2010 amounted to NOK 2,158 million and profit before tax was NOK 198 million, equivalent to a profit margin of 9.2 per cent. All the Civil Engineering units performed very well during the year. Historically low level of injuries HSE has high priority at AF and is an integral part of management at all levels. In 2010, AF had a historically low level of injuries, with an LTI rate of 1.7 for the Norwegian part of the business. The LTI rate is defined as the number of lost time injuries per million man- hours, and AF includes all sub-contractors in the Annual report 2010 calculation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hostages of the Northmen: from the Viking Age to the Middle Ages
    Part IV: Legal Rights It has previously been mentioned how hostages as rituals during peace processes – which in the sources may be described with an ambivalence, or ambiguity – and how people could be used as social capital in different conflicts. It is therefore important to understand how the persons who became hostages were vauled and how their new collective – the new household – responded to its new members and what was crucial for his or her status and participation in the new setting. All this may be related to the legal rights and special privileges, such as the right to wear coat of arms, weapons, or other status symbols. Personal rights could be regu- lated by agreements: oral, written, or even implied. Rights could also be related to the nature of the agreement itself, what kind of peace process the hostage occurred in and the type of hostage. But being a hostage also meant that a person was subjected to restric- tions on freedom and mobility. What did such situations meant for the hostage-taking party? What were their privileges and obli- gations? To answer these questions, a point of departure will be Kosto’s definition of hostages in continental and Mediterranean cultures around during the period 400–1400, when hostages were a form of security for the behaviour of other people. Hostages and law The hostage had its special role in legal contexts that could be related to the discussion in the introduction of the relationship between religion and law. The views on this subject are divided How to cite this book chapter: Olsson, S.
    [Show full text]