DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Answers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Answers Wednesday 4 March 2015 SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT Communities Lewis Macdonald (North East Scotland) (Scottish Labour): To ask the Scottish Government whether (a) its agencies and (b) public sector organisations that make savings on fuel costs because of the falling oil price will be able to retain the money saved at the end of (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16. (S4W-24573) John Swinney: The impact of any savings emerging from reduced fuel costs will be considered in the same way as any other savings and pressures that emerge across the public finances as part of our annual budget process and as part of individual public bodies and services’ own management of their budgets. Willie Rennie (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Scottish Liberal Democrats): To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to carrying out a privacy impact assessment on plans for the extension of access to the NHS Central Register. (S4W-24598) John Swinney: The NHS Central Register (NHSCR) is a register managed by National Records of Scotland and was created in the early 1950s. There is no Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the NHSCR as a whole since it pre-dates this requirement. The Scottish Government and delivery partners have two published PIAs for the policy and operational system relating to myaccount. Organisations using myaccount are also expected to undertake a PIA prior to implementing it. Consultation is an important part of the PIA process and the Scottish Government’s public consultation on the use of the NHSCR will inform the development of PIAs for each of the other proposals that we set out in the consultation that closed on 25 February 2015. PIAs will accompany the final proposals. Willie Rennie (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Scottish Liberal Democrats): To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to extending the public consultation on plans for the extension of access to the NHS Central Register until a privacy impact assessment is completed. (S4W-24599) John Swinney: I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-24598 on 4 March 2015. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at: www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx Willie Rennie (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Scottish Liberal Democrats): To ask the Scottish Government what consultation it carried out with external stakeholders regarding plans for the extension of access to the NHS Central Register ahead of the launch of the public consultation on the issue. (S4W-24600) John Swinney: Discussions were had with key stakeholders from across the Scottish public sector and HMRC as the proposals were being developed. These discussions helped to inform the final proposals set out in the public consultation. Patricia Ferguson (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (Scottish Labour): To ask the Scottish Government what work it is conducting to support schools and teachers in identifying and reporting cases of students at risk of female genital mutilation (FGM). (S4W-24625) Alex Neil: Scottish Ministers wrote to all headteachers in February 2014 to alert them that female genital mutilation is illegal in the UK, is considered child abuse and should be dealt with as a child protection concern, with links to the National Guidance for Child Protection and a number of other resources. Education Scotland subsequently prepared material for all schools to use to update staff at the start of the 2014-15 school term. Education Scotland is currently in the process of gathering resources that can be used in the classroom in an age appropriate manner. Enterprise and Environment Tavish Scott (Shetland Islands) (Scottish Liberal Democrats): To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S4W-23806 by Richard Lochhead on 9 January 2015, whether it will provide an update on its assessment of how the ban on tail-docking has impacted on working dogs, and whether it has come to a decision regarding formally consulting on a potential exemption for working dogs. Holding answer issued: 3 March 2015 (S4W-24471) Richard Lochhead: As noted in response to the question S4W-23806, the latest Scottish Government funded research investigating how the tail docking ban has impacted on working dogs was published in two peer reviewed papers in the Veterinary Record on 4 April 2014. That answer also noted that subsequent discussions were held with stakeholders regarding the impact of the results of the research on their views on the tail docking of working dogs, and that the Chief Veterinary Officer for Scotland had further investigated how exemptions allowing tail docking of working dogs have worked in practice in other parts of the UK and how any potential exemption might be genuinely restricted to working dogs in Scotland. These views and findings are being thoroughly considered before coming to a decision on what further action to take and on whether we will formally consult on a potential exemption for working dogs. John Lamont (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party): To ask the Scottish Government how it is supporting jobs in the fishing industry in Berwickshire. (S4W-24533) Richard Lochhead: The Scottish Government places a high importance on the fishing industry and the benefits it brings to local communities such as those in Berwickshire and has been working with other government agencies to provide assistance to help maintain and indeed create new jobs locally in both the onshore and offshore sectors. The Scottish Government fought hard and proactively in the annual EU fisheries negotiations to secure the best deal for Scotland’s fishermen in 2015 – of course respecting science and sustainability issues – and thinking ahead to creating the best starting point for negotiating quota for 2016 under the first year of the demersal landing obligation. Helpfully, to fishermen on the east coast, an increase in the Scottish share of the North Sea quota for Nephrops was secured. We are also taking steps to empower local communities. The east coast Inshore Fisheries Group (IFG) includes the Berwickshire area. IFGs are non-statutory bodies that aim to improve the management of Scotland’s inshore fisheries (out to six nautical miles) and to give commercial inshore fishermen a strong voice in wider marine management developments. Our national inshore fisheries programme is actively supporting these ambitions, from testing new technologies to researching new approaches to managing the interactions between mobile and static fishing vessels in the inshore environment. The government has utilised the European Fisheries Fund to make 12 awards to a range of fisheries related businesses in Berwickshire since 2008 amounting to £588,000 which has enabled investment of £1.5 million and a target of 49 jobs. Examples include five fishing vessel modernisation grants totalling £27,000 which have enabled investment of £104,000, three fishing port facilities projects at Eyemouth Harbour attracting grants of £142,000 enabling investment of £188,000 and creating 11 jobs, and four processing and marketing grants totalling £419,000 which enabled investment of £1.23 million in facilities and plant and which aim to create 38 jobs. The government will also work to maximise the benefit to fishing communities, such as those in Berwickshire, of the successor European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), which will provide a widened package of support for marine actions. We plan to launch the new scheme later this year. The Scottish allocation of the EMFF is over 107 euros and will be co-financed with domestic funds. A Scottish Creel Support Fund was launched in February 2014 to support this sector which suffered due to the exceptional weather during the winter of 2012-13. The government made available over £400,000 to assist the sector in two ways, £300,000 direct funding of which £40,000 was awarded to 20 fishermen in the south east of Scotland. Additionally funding totalling £100,000 was provided to assist with developing new and existing markets for creel caught produce. The UK-wide Coastal Communities Fund (CCF), administered by the Big Lottery Fund in Scotland, has awarded over £190,000 to two fisheries projects in the last three years; the Firth of Forth Lobster Hatchery received funds to develop a lobster hatchery based at North Berwick Harbour, and Seton Care received funds to deliver training programmes to those in the fisheries, offshore and processing sectors around the coast from the Forth to East Berwickshire. Whilst there are no further rounds of CCF funding expected, the Smith Commission recommendations will enable us to make sure that island and coastal local authorities receive 100% of net revenues generated from the existing functions of the Crown Estate in Scottish waters out to 12 nautical miles so that coastal and island communities can benefit in future from the assets currently administered by the Crown Estate. John Lamont (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party): To ask the Scottish Government how many jobs have been connected to the fishing industry in Berwickshire in each year since 1999. (S4W-24534) Richard Lochhead: The number of fishermen employed in Berwickshire fishing creeks is given in the following table: Total number of fishermen employed in Berwickshire 1999 to 2013 Burnmouth Cove Eyemouth St Abbs Total 1999 16 3 98 28 145 2000 17 2 149 16 184 2001 12 3 136 11 162 2002 7 1 100 10 118 2003 8 2 99 10 119 2004 8 2 97 9 116 2005 8 2 99 7 116 2006 8 2 104 5 119 2007 10 2 89 5 106 2008 7 2 65 5 79 2009 9 2 62 6 79 2010 21 6 74 - 101 2011 17 4 64 14 99 2012 19 4 59 14 96 2013 22 5 73 15 115 Tavish Scott (Shetland Islands) (Scottish Liberal Democrats): To ask the Scottish Government what proportion of the £13,938.1 million turnover in the food and drink sector identified in its growth sector statistics is attributable to the seafood and aquaculture industries when all income from fish processing is included.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix-2019-89-Child-Poverty-Action-Plan.Pdf
    Appendix-2019-89 Borders NHS Board Meeting Date: 27 June 2019 Approved by: Tim Patterson, Director of Public Health Author: Allyson McCollam, Associate Director of Public Health CHILD POVERTY ACTION PLAN Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to update the NHS Board on the development of the Scottish Borders Child Poverty Action Plan in response to the Child Poverty (Scotland) Act 2017. Recommendations: The Board is asked to note and approve Child Poverty Action Plan. Approval Pathways: This report has been prepared in consultation with the key members of the CPP Reducing Inequalities Delivery Group. This Plan has been approved by the Community Planning Partnership on 13th June 2019 for submission to the Scottish Government in June 2019. Executive Summary: This is the first such annual Local Action Plan report for Scottish Borders. It describes the challenges faced in measuring child poverty locally, how this plan links to existing activity, what we have delivered in the reporting period 2018 /19 and what we are committed to delivering over the 2019/20 financial year. This will form the basis for identifying areas that we would like to develop further in the future. It is recognised that partnership is key to the achievement of the outcomes we want for our children, young people and families in Scottish Borders, and this will mean working collaboratively to tackle the drivers of child poverty: income from employment, income from social security and cost of living. The areas for action are as follows: Employability Housing Customer services including welfare benefits advice Education Health and wellbeing The health and wellbeing workstream includes the NHS duty to provide financial inclusion pathways for families with children from the antenatal stage and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Borders
    The Scottish Borders An Introduction March 2017 2015 Population Total % % Working % Pension Area Forum / Ward Children Working Age Pension Age Population Children Age Age Berwickshire 3,332 12,268 5,227 20,827 16% 59% 25% East Berwickshire 1,745 6,243 2,603 10,591 16% 59% 25% Mid Berwickshire 1,587 6,025 2,624 10,236 16% 59% 26% Cheviot 2,987 11,273 5,254 19,514 15% 58% 27% Jedburgh and District 1,419 5,384 2,394 9,197 15% 59% 26% Kelso and District 1,568 5,889 2,860 10,317 15% 57% 28% Eildon 5,968 21,718 7,349 35,035 17% 62% 21% Galashiels and District 2,419 9,555 2,658 14,632 17% 65% 18% Leaderdale and 2,046 6,439 2,294 10,779 19% 60% 21% Melrose Selkirkshire 1,503 5,724 2,397 9,624 16% 59% 25% Teviot and Liddesdale 2,824 10,566 4,416 17,806 16% 59% 25% Hawick and Denholm 1,665 5,503 2,117 9,285 18% 59% 23% Hawick and Hermitage 1,159 5,063 2,299 8,521 14% 59% 27% Tweeddale 3,864 12,482 4,502 20,848 19% 60% 22% Tweeddale East 2,107 6,343 2,355 10,805 20% 59% 22% Tweeddale West 1,757 6,139 2,147 10,043 17% 61% 21% Grand Total 18,975 68,307 26,748 114,030 17% 60% 23% % % Working Pension Total % Children Working Pension Age Age Population Children Data Zone Name Age Age Bonchester Bridge and Chesters Area 83 421 233 737 11.3% 57.1% 31.6% Denholm 87 349 205 641 13.6% 54.4% 32.0% Hawick - Burnfoot - Central 220 447 98 765 28.8% 58.4% 12.8% Hawick - Burnfoot - North 275 516 63 854 32.2% 60.4% 7.4% Hawick - Burnfoot - South East 152 438 153 743 20.5% 59.0% 20.6% Hawick - Burnfoot - West 138 373 106 617 22.4% 60.5% 17.2% Hawick Central - Drumlanrig
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Local Election
    Local authority elections in Scotland Report 3 May 2007 and Analysis The illustration on the cover of this report represents the town hall in Lerwick, Shetland, a building whose imposing features reflect the important role of local councils and local democracy. Its foundations were laid in 1884, the year that the Electoral Reform Society was established. Local authority elections in Scotland Report and 3 May 2007 Analysis Local authority elections in Scotland 3 May 2007 5 Contents Acknowledgements 7 Introduction 9 Summary 11 17 Part 1: What happened in the elections? Chapter 1: The results of 3 May 2007 17 Chapter 2: The political parties and the local elections 29 Chapter 3: Candidate strategy in multi-member wards 51 Chapter 4: Representation of women, young people and minorities 57 65 Part 2: The voters’ experience Chapter 5: More choice for voters 65 Chapter 6: Transferable voting 69 Chapter 7: Did people record valid votes? 83 91 Part 3: Election issues Chapter 8: Ballot design 91 Chapter 9: Multi-member wards 97 107 Part 4: Looking ahead Chapter 10: Looking forward 107 111 Appendix Scotland’s 32 new councils 111 Local authority elections in Scotland 3 May 2007 7 Acknowledgements and Dedication A project of this size is never a one-person job and I would like to thank Ken Ritchie, Amy Rodger and Martin Steven in particular for their constant help, guidance and support. Alasdair Stuart contributed magnificently to the sections on the results council-by-council and equalities. Other colleagues have assisted with the text and gathering data, including Christine McCartney, Gertrud Malmersjo and Hywel Nelson.
    [Show full text]
  • Berwickshire Extract
    KnowBorders: Scottish Borders Community Planning Partnership 2016 Strategic Assessment: Berwickshire Extract Version Control No. Action Start Date Complete Date Result 1 Berwickshire SA based on full 01/07/2016 18/08/2016 SA2016- SA2016 Berwickshire – V1 Contact details for Strategic Assessment 2016: Strategic Policy Unit Scottish Borders Council Email: [email protected] Tel: 01835 824000 SB-SA2016 - Berwickshire - V1 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction and Summary of Key Findings – Berwickshire Extract ................................................................. 4 Strategic Assessment 2016 Development ......................................................................................................... 6 Berwickshire: Area Profile ................................................................................................................................. 7 Summary of Population Trends ..................................................................................................................... 7 Population ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Life Expectancy ............................................................................................................................................ 17 Migration, Ethnicity and National Identity
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution
    AREA PARTNERSHIPS Constitution 1. Each Area Partnership will comprise – (a) Core Members: i. The elected Scottish Borders Councillors representing – Berwickshire Area Partnership: the six Elected Members for the Wards of East Berwickshire and Mid- Berwickshire; Cheviot Area Partnership: the six Elected Members for the Wards of Kelso & District and Jedburgh and District; Eildon Area Partnership: the ten Elected Members for the Wards of Galashiels & District, Leaderdale & Melrose, and Selkirkshire; Teviot & Liddesdale Area Partnership: the six Elected Members for the Wards of Hawick & Denholm and Hawick & Hermitage; Tweeddale Area Partnership: the six Elected Members for the Wards of Tweeddale East and Tweeddale West; ii. One representative from each of four different Community Councils in the Area Partnership area as non-voting members; iii. Any other non-voting member appointed by the Area Partnership up to a total core membership maximum of 20. (b) Additional Invited members: Invitations to attend and participate as non-voting members in meetings where there are relevant agenda items: i. appropriate representative(s) from the Community Planning partners (NHS Borders, Scottish Police, Scottish Fire & Rescue Service, Scottish Enterprise, Live Borders, RSLs, Borders College, Health & Social Care Integration Board, SEPA, SNH, Skills Development Scotland, SESTRAN, Third Sector, Visit Scotland); ii. a representative from any other Community Group or Local body, as appropriate; and iii. a representative from any other community of interest group, as appropriate. Chairman/Vice Chairman The Chairman and Vice Chairman of each Area Partnership shall be a Member of Scottish Borders Council. Quorum Three of the Scottish Borders Council Members of each Locality Committee, including at least one representative from each Ward, shall constitute a quorum, except for the Eildon Area Partnership where five shall constitute a Quorum.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland 5Th Review of Electoral Arrangements – Recommendations to Scottish Ministers
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND 5TH REVIEW OF ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS – RECOMMENDATIONS TO SCOTTISH MINISTERS Report by Chief Executive SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL 29 June 2016 1 PURPOSE AND SUMMARY 1.1 This report advises the Council of the final report and recommendations being made by the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland to Scottish Ministers for the number of Councillors and the Electoral Ward Boundaries for the Scottish Borders Council area. 1.2 The Local Government Boundary Commission has submitted to Scottish Ministers its Reports and Final Recommendations for the number of Councillors and the electoral ward boundaries in each of Scotland’s 32 local authorities, which included those for the Scottish Borders Council area. The Commission has recommended that from May 2017, Scottish Borders Council should comprise 32 Councillors in 10 Wards, comprising 2 Wards each returning 4 Members, and 8 Wards each returning 3 Members. 1.3 The Council has previously provided two responses to consultations by the Commission (in April 2014 and May 2015) and another response to the then Scottish Minister for Local Government and Community Empowerment in February 2016. The Council has a six week period from 26 May 2016 to submit any comments to Scottish Ministers at the Directorate for Local Government and Communities. Members should note that any substantive change to that response made in February 2016 would require the suspension of Standing Orders, as the decision was taken within the preceding 6 months. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 I recommend that the Council considers whether it wishes to make any further comments to Scottish Ministers regarding the final recommendations of the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland for the proposed number of Councillors and the Electoral Ward Boundaries for the Scottish Borders Council area.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOTTISH BORDERS 03.Indd
    Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Scottish Borders Council Area Report E06026 Report to Scottish Ministers July 2006 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Scottish Borders Council Area Constitution of the Commission Chairman: Mr John L Marjoribanks Deputy Chairman: Mr Brian Wilson OBE Commissioners: Professor Hugh M Begg Dr A Glen Mr K McDonald Mr R Millham Report Number E06026 July 2006 Scottish Borders Council Area 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland 2 Scottish Borders Council Area Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Contents Page Summary Page 7 Part 1 Background Pages 9 – 14 Paragraphs Origin of the Review 1 The Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004 2 – 4 Commencement of the 2004 Act 5 Directions from Scottish Ministers 6 – 9 Announcement of our Review 10 – 16 General Issues 17 – 18 Defi nition of Electoral Ward Boundaries 19 – 24 Electorate Data used in the Review 25 – 26 Part 2 The Review in Scottish Borders Council Area Pages 15 – 26 Paragraphs Meeting with the Scottish Borders Council 1 – 3 Concluded View of the Council 4 – 7 Aggregation of Existing Wards 8 – 11 Initial Proposals 12 – 19 Informing the Council of our Initial Proposals 20 – 21 The Scottish Borders Council Response 22 – 23 Consideration of the Council Response to the Initial Proposals 24 – 30 Provisional Proposals 31 – 35 Representations 36 Consideration of Representations 37 – 46 Part 3 Final Recommendation Pages
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: out of Work Claimant Count Data1
    Appendix 1: Out of Work Claimant Count data1 Unemployment Claimant Count in the Scottish Borders and Scotland December 2019 December 2020 Change 2020 Less 2019 Claimaint Claimaint Claimant % Change of Area Age Group Count % of Pop Count % of Pop Count Count % of Pop Aged 16+ 1,775 2.6% 3,505 5.2% 1,730 97.5% 2.6% Scottish Aged 18 To 24 390 5.0% 765 9.8% 375 96.2% 4.8% Borders Aged 25 To 49 915 3.0% 1,760 5.8% 845 92.3% 2.8% Aged 50+ 455 1.7% 960 3.5% 505 111.0% 1.8% Aged 16+ 110,705 3.2% 207,180 5.9% 96,475 87.1% 2.7% Aged 18 To 24 20,420 4.4% 38,550 8.3% 18,130 88.8% 3.9% Scotland Aged 25 To 49 62,075 3.5% 116,130 6.5% 54,055 87.1% 3.0% Aged 50+ 27,405 2.4% 51,420 4.5% 24,015 87.6% 2.1% Across all age groups the Scottish Borders had a higher change in count of Out-of-Work claimants compared to Scotland. % Change in count of Out-of-Work Claimants December 2019 to 2020 Age Group, Scottish Borders vs.Scotland. Source: NOMIS 120.0% 110.0% 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 97.5% 87.1% 96.2% 88.8% 92.3% 87.1% 111.0% 87.6% 60.0% Scottish Scotland Scottish Scotland Scottish Scotland Scottish Scotland Borders Borders Borders Borders Aged 16+ Aged 18 To 24 Aged 25 To 49 Aged 50+ In December 2020 the Scottish Borders had a higher proportion of population aged 18-24 claiming Out-of- Work benefits compared to Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Interests for the Parliamentary
    REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS Member’s Name: George Adam Region/Constituency: Paisley Date on which Initial Statement Lodged: 01 June 2016 Information on the exact nature of the requirement under each category can be found in the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006. Remuneration and No registrable interests related undertaking Gifts No registrable interests Overseas visits No registrable interests Controlled transactions No registrable interests Heritable property No registrable interests Interest in shares No registrable interests Voluntary I am a member of Unite (T and G Section). I am a member of the MS Society of Scotland. I am a member of the Club @ Renfrewshire. I am a member of the 1820 Society. I am a member of the Paisley Burgh Branch of the SNP. I am patron of the Scottish Disability Equality Forum. I am Chair of the St Mirren Independent Supporters’ Association. I am Honorary President of Paisley Pirates. REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS Member’s Name: Clare Adamson Region/Constituency: Motherwell and Wishaw Date on which Initial Statement Lodged: 02 June 2016 Information on the exact nature of the requirement under each category can be found in the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Act 2006. Remuneration and No registrable interests related undertaking Gifts No registrable interests Overseas visits No registrable interests Controlled transactions No registrable interests Heritable property No registrable interests Interest in shares No registrable interests Voluntary I am a member of the British Computer Society. I am a member of the National Union of Journalists. I am a member of the National Trust for Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland 5Th Review of Electoral Arrangements – Proposals for Wards
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND 5TH REVIEW OF ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS – PROPOSALS FOR WARDS Report by Chief Executive SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL 21 May 2015 1 PURPOSE AND SUMMARY 1.1 This report seeks approval for a proposed response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland’s proposals for wards in the Scottish Borders Council area. 1.2 The current proposals by the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland for the Scottish Borders Council area present an electoral arrangement for 32 Councillors representing 8 x 3-member wards and 2 x 4-member wards, reducing the number of wards in the area by 1 and reducing Councillor numbers by 2. Appendix 1 details the electorates and associated variation from parity of the proposed Wards, and gives details of the Commission’s new Ward proposals, in particular Jedburgh, Denholm & Hermitage and Hawick. The proposals remove the existing Hawick & Denholm and Hawick & Hermitage Wards, placing Newcastleton and Denholm (and surrounding areas) into a new Jedburgh, Denholm & Hermitage Ward. A minor change is also proposed moving around 80 electors from Charlesfield from the Jedburgh Ward into the Selkirkshire Ward, with the detail of this change in boundary given in Appendix 2. 1.3 The Commission has made it clear that parity of electors to Councillors is the main determinant for Councillor numbers and ward design. This has been used to develop a response for the Council, proposing a different configuration of Wards, retaining Newcastleton in a Hawick Ward. Details of this are given in Appendix 3. Consideration has been given to including Denholm in the Hawick Ward but this is not being recommended as it would take the total electorate for that Ward 20% above parity.
    [Show full text]
  • Tweeddale West • Heather Anderson
    APPENDIX I SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL 18 MAY 2017 MEMBERS ELECTED ON 5 MAY 2017 Ward 1 – Tweeddale West Heather Anderson (Scottish National Party) Kris Chapman (Scottish Liberal Democrats) Eric Small (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party) Ward 2 – Tweeddale East Shona Haslam (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party) Stuart Bell (Scottish National Party) Robin Tatler (Independent) Ward 3 – Galashiels and District Andy Anderson (Scottish National Party) Euan Jardine (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party) Sandy Aitchison (Independent) Harry Scott (Independent) Ward 4 – Selkirkshire Michelle Ballantyne (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Elaine Thornton-Nicol (Scottish National Party) Gordon Edgar (Independent) Ward 5 – Leaderdale and Melrose David Parker (Independent) Tom Miers (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Kevin Drum (Scottish National Party) Ward 6 – Mid Berwickshire John Greenwell (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Mark Rowley (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Donald Moffat (Scottish National Party) Ward 7 – East Berwickshire Jim Fullarton (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Carol Hamilton (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Helen Laing (Scottish National Party) Ward 8 – Kelso and District Simon Mountford (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Tom Weatherston (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Euan Robson (Scottish Liberal Democrats) Ward 9 – Jedburgh and District Scott Hamilton (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Sandy Scott (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Jim Brown (Scottish National Party) Ward 10 – Hawick and Denholm Stuart Marshall (Independent) Neil Richards (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Clair Ramage (Scottish National Party) Ward 11 – Hawick and Hermitage Watson McAteer (Independent) George Turnbull (Scottish Conservative and Unionist) Davie Paterson (Independent).
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Borders Picture of Poverty
    Appendix A Scottish Borders Picture of Poverty Contents Demographic Challenge.....................................................................................................................................2 Life Expectancy ..................................................................................................................................................3 Health Impact on Poverty..................................................................................................................................4 Income and Employment...................................................................................................................................5 Wages ............................................................................................................................................................5 Workless Households ....................................................................................................................................6 Out-of-Work Benefits ....................................................................................................................................7 Impact of Covid-19 on Employment and Businesses...................................................................................14 Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD)................................................................................................15 Fuel Poverty.....................................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]