Ordinary Meeting Held on 14/12/2020

From: Danni Moore Sent: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 16:26:47 +1000 To: [email protected] Subject: 2008-18332 SRA application correspondence Attachments: Approved Plans and Documents.pdf, GE83-N Representations about a referral agency response.pdf, RA6-N Response with conditions.pdf

#ECMBODY #QAP ALL STAFF DEFAULT #NOREG #SILENT

From: No Reply Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2020 4:09 PM To: Scenic Rim Regional Council Mail Cc: [email protected] Subject: 2008-18332 SRA application correspondence

Please find attached a notice regarding application 2008-18332 SRA.

If you require any further information in relation to the application, please contact the State Assessment and Referral Agency on the details provided in the notice.

This is a system-generated message. Do not respond to this email. RA6-N

Queensland Treasury

Email Id: RFLG-0920-0008-7535

This email and any attachments are confidential and may be legally privileged or protected from disclosure and copyright. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not use, disclose, retain, copy, forward, reproduce, disseminate or distribute this message or any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient please email the sender or notify Scenic Rim Regional Council and delete this message and any attachment from your system. Any views expressed in this email transmission may represent those of the individual sender and may include information that has not been approved by Scenic Rim Regional Council. The Council will not be responsible for any reliance upon personal views or information not approved by Scenic Rim Regional Council.

Scenic Rim Regional Council advises that this email and any attachments should be scanned to detect viruses and accepts no liability for loss or damage resulting from the use of any attached files.

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Date: Version 1, Version: ID: 11050267 Set Document THIS ENGINEERING LAYOUT WAS PRODUCED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PINNACLE GROUP'S CLIENT AS NOMINATED HEREIN. DOES NOT GRANT CONSENT TO ANY THIRD PARTY RELY ON INFORMATION WITHIN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN FROM GROUP. GROUP ADVISES THAT DIMENSIONS SHALL BE SCALED. DETENTION DETAILS CATCHMENT DATA BIO-RETENTION BASIN DETAILS CATCHMENT TABLE (POST) NOTES LEGEND LEVEL 1 19 SHORT STREET, SOUTHPORT QLD 4215 (PO BOX 517, PARADISE POINT QLD 4216) A1 WWW.PINNACLEENG.COM.AU A1 A2 A3 REV B A

A4 EXT1 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL ISSUED FOR COMMENT DESCRIPTION

BROOKLANDS DRIVE BROOKLANDS DRAWN M.G. M.G.

24.07.2020 09.07.2020 DATE

DRAWN DESIGN REVIEW TASK SCALE (SCALE ABOVE DENOTES ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE - A1) A. CRESSWELL M. GLASSON B. POPA BY INITIAL A2 09.07.2020 09.07.2020 09.07.2020 DATE CLIENT EXT1 PANO PTY LTD A3 A1 PROJECT 202 BROOKLANDS DRIVE, PROPOSED CHILDCARE BEAUDESERT QLD 4285 (LOT 501 ON RP 808820) CENTRE STATUS DRAWING TITLE A4 A3 (NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION) PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LAYOUT

BROOKLANDS DRIVE PEG0685-DA-SK03 DRAWING NUMBER APPROVED RPEQ No REVISION B

PEG0685-DA-SK03 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LAYOUT.dwg 24.07.2020 Letter (8.50 x 11.00 Inches) None Jarrin Noise Impact Assessment Proposed Childcare Centre 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert

Pano Pty Ltd

Project No.: ATP200425

Project Name: Childcare Centre Beaudesert

Document No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01

July 2020

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Document Control Record

Prepared by: Bojan Todorovski Approved by: Sasho Temelkoski RPEQ 13551

Position: Engineer - Acoustics Position: Manager - Acoustics

Signed: Signed:

Date: 30 July 2020 Date: 30 July 2020

REVISION STATUS Revision No. Description of Revision Date Approved

1 Issue 01 30 July 2020 S. Temelkoski

Recipients are responsible for eliminating all superseded documents in their possession.

atf ATP Engineering Trust ABN: 95 634 079 845

Gold Coast Brisbane Perth 34 Lakefront Crescent Studio 5, 33 Vulture Street Suite 59, 102 Railway Street Varsity Lakes, QLD 4227 West End QLD 4101 West Perth WA 6005 Ph: (07) 5593 0487 Ph: 0499 015 150 Ph: (08) 9265 1424

E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.atpconsulting.com.au

RELIANCE, USES and LIMITATIONS This report is copyright and is to be used only for its intended purpose by the intended recipient and is not to be copied or used in any other way. The report may be relied upon for its intended purpose within the limits of the following disclaimer. This study, report and analyses have been based on the information available to ATP Consulting Engineers at the time of preparation. ATP Consulting Engineers accepts responsibility for the report and its conclusions to the extent that the information was sufficient and accurate at the time of preparation. ATP Consulting Engineers does not take responsibility for errors and omissions due to incorrect information or information not available to ATP Consulting Engineers at the time of preparation of the study, report or analyses.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page i Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Executive Summary

ATP Consulting Engineers was engaged to prepare a noise impact assessment (NIA) for the proposed childcare centre at 202 Brooklands Drive in Beaudesert.

This report addresses the following two issues:

• Road traffic noise impact from the state-controlled noise corridor of Beaudesert-Nerang Road on the proposed childcare centre; and • Operational noise impact from the proposed childcare centre on the nearest noise sensitive places.

Traffic Noise Impact Assessment

The traffic noise propagation modelling was carried out considering the future traffic flows along Beaudesert-Nerang Road for a 10-year planning horizon. The results of the modelling indicate traffic noise impacts on the external façades of the proposed childcare centre. With consideration of 1.8m high noise barrier fence, the traffic noise criteria can be meet at the outdoor play areas. The specifications for the construction of the noise barrier fence are presented in Section 5.2 of this report.

The highest calculated traffic noise level at the outdoor play areas is 62.4 dB(A) L10,12hr (free-field),

which complies with the 63 dB(A) L10,12hr (free-field) criterion. Within a 10-year planning horizon, the highest calculated traffic noise level at the façades of the education areas of the proposed childcare

centre is 64.4 dB(A) L10,1hr (façade corrected). The traffic noise levels exceed the criterion of 58 dB(A)

L10,1hr (façade corrected), thus architectural treatment is required to the building of the proposed childcare centre, as per Section 5.3 of this report.

Operational Noise Impact Assessment

The results of the noise propagation modelling indicate that without noise control measures, there is a potential for noise impacts on the nearest noise sensitive receptors from the operation of the childcare centre.

The noise impacts on the nearest noise sensitive receptors are associated with the use of the outdoor play areas. To protect the noise amenity at the nearest dwellings, it is recommended to construct noise barrier fence (1.8m high) along the perimeter of the outdoor play areas.

The specifications for the construction of the noise barrier fence are presented in Section 5.2 of this report.

Air conditioning condenser units, kitchen exhaust fans or refrigeration compressors (if applicable) and all other mechanical equipment must be appropriately screened and attenuated to ensure that the noise levels at the nearest noise sensitive land uses comply with the noise criteria.

Provided that the recommendations of this report are fully implemented, there are no further acoustic constraints on the establishment of the proposed childcare centre at 202 Brooklands Drive in, Beaudesert.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page ii Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Table of Contents

Executive Summary ...... ii Acoustics Glossary ...... vi 1. Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Project Background ...... 1 1.2 Study Objectives ...... 1 1.2.1 Traffic Noise Impact Assessment ...... 1 1.2.2 Operational Noise Impact Assessment ...... 1 1.3 Subject Site ...... 2 1.4 Proposed Development ...... 2 2. Existing Noise Amenity ...... 3 2.1 Noise Measurement Locations ...... 3 2.2 Unattended Noise Measurement Results ...... 4 3. Road Traffic Noise Impact Assessment ...... 6 3.1 Road Traffic Noise Criteria ...... 6 3.1.1 Acoustic Design – AS3671:1989 ...... 8 3.1.2 Internal Noise Criteria ...... 8 3.2 Traffic Noise Calculation Methodology ...... 8 3.3 Traffic Flow Data ...... 9 3.4 Road Traffic Noise Model Validation ...... 10 3.5 Traffic Noise Calculation Results ...... 18 3.5.1 External Façade Noise Criteria ...... 18 3.5.2 Outdoor Play Area Noise Criteria ...... 18 4. Operational Noise Impact Assessment ...... 19 4.1 Nearest Noise Sensitive Land Uses ...... 19 4.2 Noise Criteria ...... 20 4.2.1 Scenic Rim Regional Council Planning Scheme ...... 20 4.2.2 Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019 ...... 21 4.3 Operational Noise Calculation Methodology ...... 22 4.4 Noise Sources ...... 24 4.5 Operational Noise Calculation Results ...... 27 4.5.1 EPP 2019 – Acoustic Quality Objectives ...... 27 4.5.2 EPP 2019 – Background Creep Criteria ...... 28 5. Discussion and Recommendations ...... 29 5.1 Noise Propagation Modelling Results ...... 29 5.1.1 Traffic Noise Impact Assessment ...... 29 5.1.2 Operational Noise Impact Assessment ...... 29 5.2 Noise Control Measures ...... 30 5.2.1 Noise Attenuation Structures – Noise Barrier Fences ...... 30

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page iii Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 5.2.2 Acoustic Design of the Childcare Building Façade ...... 32 5.2.3 Internal Noise Criteria (Design Internal Noise Levels)...... 33 5.3 Acoustic Design Specifications ...... 33 5.3.1 External Walls ...... 33 5.3.2 Roof/Ceilings...... 34 5.3.3 Windows ...... 34 5.3.4 Ventilation ...... 34 5.3.5 Mechanical Plant ...... 35 6. Conclusions ...... 36 7. References...... 37 8. Appendices ...... 38

Tables

Table 2.1 Noise Measurements ...... 3 Table 3.1 Performance and Acceptable Outcomes (SDAP State Code 1) ...... 6 Table 3.2 Internal Traffic Noise Criteria ...... 8 Table 3.3 Data and Assumptions – Traffic Noise Model ...... 8 Table 3.4 Traffic Flow Data for Validation ...... 9 Table 3.5 SoundPLAN Traffic Noise Model Validation Results ...... 10 Table 3.6 Traffic Noise Levels – Building Façades ...... 18 Table 3.7 Traffic Noise Levels – Outdoor Play Areas ...... 18 Table 4.1 Nearest Noise Sensitive Land Uses ...... 19 Table 4.2 Excerpt from General Development Provisions Code ...... 20 Table 4.3 Acoustic Quality Objectives Criteria ...... 21 Table 4.4 Background Creep Noise Criteria ...... 22 Table 4.5 Noise Descriptor Conversion Factors ...... 23 Table 4.6 Data and Assumptions – Operational Noise Model...... 23 Table 4.7 Noise Sources ...... 24 Table 4.8 Operational Noise Levels – Acoustic Quality Objectives ...... 27 Table 4.9 Operational Noise Levels – Background Creep Criteria ...... 28 Table 5.1 Noise Barrier RLs ...... 30 Table 5.2 Internal Traffic Noise Criteria ...... 33 Table 5.3 Recommended Construction for the External Walls...... 34

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page iv Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Figures

Figure 1.1 Site Location ...... 2 Figure 2.1 Noise measurement location ...... 4 Figure 3.1 3D Traffic Noise Model – SoundPLAN Excerpt – Full Road Alignment ...... 11 Figure 3.2 3D Traffic Noise Model – SoundPLAN Excerpt – Detail 1 ...... 12 Figure 4.1 Nearest Noise Sensitive Land Uses ...... 19 Figure 4.2 SoundPLAN Operational Noise Model ...... 26 Figure 5.1 Alignment of the Recommended Noise Barrier Fence ...... 32

Appendices

Appendix A – Development Layout Appendix B – Site Photos Appendix C – Meteorological Data Appendix D – Background Noise Measurement Results Appendix E – AADT Segment Report Appendix F – Validation of CoRTN Traffic Noise Model Appendix G – Tabulated Traffic Noise Levels Appendix H – Traffic Noise Contours Appendix I – Tabulated Operational Noise Levels Appendix J – Operational Noise Contour Maps Appendix K – Traffic Noise Attenuation Specifications

Appendix L – Rw Ratings for the Windows

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page v Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Acoustics Glossary

A-weighting Correction to sound levels to mimic the response of the human ear at low sound frequencies. A-weighting filter covers the full audio range - 20 Hz to 20 kHz and the shape mimics the response of the human ear at the lower frequency levels.

Attenuation Term used to indicate reduction of noise or vibration, usually expressed in decibels (dB). Broadband sound Sound distributed across the whole audible frequency range.

Decibel (dB) (1) Degree of loudness (2) A unit for expressing the relative intensity of sounds on a scale from zero for the average least perceptible sound to about 130 for the average pain level. A unit used to express relative difference in power or intensity, between two acoustic signals, equal to ten times the common logarithm of the ratio of the two levels, one of which is a standard reference value.

dB(A) The A-weighted sound pressure level in dB.

Façade adjusted The noise level at 1m from a building façade is calculated by adding 2.5dB to the free- field noise level to account for sound reflected from the building façade. The external noise levels at the buildings façades are “façade-adjusted”.

Free-field Noise level without any reflected sound from buildings or other hard, reflective surfaces (except for the ground plane).

Hz (Hertz) Hertz is the standard measure of the frequency of oscillations in a wave motion. The frequency is most often measured in cycles per second (cps) or Hertz (Hz). Frequency of 1 Hz is one cycle per second.

Impulsive noise Noise having a high peak of short duration or a sequence of such peaks. Impulsive and noise is present if the difference in A-weighted maximum noise levels between fast impulsiveness response and impulse response is greater than 2dB. Impulsiveness adjustment adjustment (penalty) of up to 5dB should be applied to the component noise level.

LAmax,T The maximum A-weighted sound pressure level occurring in a specified time period T in seconds.

LAeq,T “Average-energy” sound level used in situations where sound varies over time. LAeq,T is the A-weighted sound pressure level that has the same energy as the fluctuating sound over the time period T in seconds.

LA01,T Measure of the maximum sound level. LA01,T is a statistical parameter that is the A- weighted sound pressure level that is exceeded for 1% of the measurement time T.

LA90,T Background sound level. LA90,T is a statistical parameter that is the A-weighted sound pressure level that is exceeded for 90% of the measurement time T.

Noise Unwanted sound.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page vi Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Octave bands and A range of frequencies whose upper frequency limit is twice that of its lower frequency 1/3 octave bands limit. In acoustics, the audible spectrum (20Hz to 20kHz) is divided into 10 parts (octaves) with centre frequencies of 31.5Hz, 63Hz, 125Hz, 250Hz, 500Hz, 1kHz, 2kHz, 4kHz, 8kHz and 16kHz. For more detailed frequency analysis, octave bands are further divided into more discrete bands. For examples, 1/3 octaves bands are is where each octave band is divided into three parts. IEC 61260:1995, Electroacoustics — Octave-band and fractional-octave band filters

Sound power The sound energy radiated per unit time by a sound source, measured in Watts (W).

Sound Power Logarithmic measure of sound power on a decibel scale, referenced to the human -12 Level, Lw (SWL) hearing threshold of 1 x 10 W.

Sound pressure The fluctuations in air, measured in Pascals (Pa).

Sound Pressure Logarithmic measure of sound pressure on a decibel scale, referenced to the human -5 Level, Lp (SPL) hearing threshold of 2 x 10 Pa.

Tonal noise, Tonal noise is characterised by one or more distinct frequency components (“tones”) tonality and that emerge audibly from the total sound. For example, distinct tones may be emitted tonality by fans, saws, grinders and other equipment. Tonal noise is generally far more adjustment annoying than non-tonal noise. Presence of tonal sound (“tonality”) can be identified by analysing the sound levels in adjacent 1/3 octave bands. AS1055.2018 and the DEHP Noise Measurement Manual 2013 provides guidance on how tonality should be assessed. If tonal components are clearly audible and they can be detected by 1/3 octave analysis (1/3 octave band exceeds neighbouring bands by at least 5dB), tonality adjustment (penalty) of up to 5dB should be applied to the component noise level.

Weighted Sound A single-number quantity which characterises the airborne sound insulation of a Reduction Index material or building element over a range of frequencies. (Rw)

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page vii Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

1. Introduction

1.1 Project Background

ATP Consulting Engineers was engaged to prepare a noise impact assessment (NIA) for the proposed childcare centre at 202 Brooklands Drive in Beaudesert.

This report addresses the following two issues:

• Road traffic noise impact from the state-controlled noise corridor of Beaudesert-Nerang Road on the proposed childcare centre; and

• Operational noise impact from the proposed childcare centre on the nearest noise sensitive places.

1.2 Study Objectives

Study objectives are as follows:

1.2.1 Traffic Noise Impact Assessment

• Development of a 3D noise propagation model considering the proposed childcare centre and future road traffic along the state-controlled Beaudesert-Nerang Road.

• Consideration of the relevant traffic noise criteria applicable to the proposed development.

• Assessment of the traffic noise levels from Beaudesert-Nerang Road, within a 10-year planning horizon, at the façades and the outdoor play areas of the proposed childcare centre.

• Recommendation of traffic noise mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the noise criteria at the outdoor play areas and at the interior of the proposed childcare centre.

1.2.2 Operational Noise Impact Assessment

• Identification of potential noise sources associated with the childcare centre with a potential to affect the noise amenity of the adjacent noise sensitive receptors (adjoining residential properties).

• Establishment of noise criteria for protection of the noise amenity at the adjacent noise sensitive receptors based on Scenic Rim Regional Council (SRRC) Planning Scheme, the AAAC Guideline for Child Care Centre Acoustic Assessment and other applicable legislation and guidelines.

• Development of a 3D noise propagation model using SoundPLAN software considering the proposed development layout, the nearest noise sensitive receptors, and operational noise sources at the childcare centre (i.e. car parking, deliveries, waste collection, mechanical plant (air conditioning condensers and kitchen exhaust), and the use of the outdoor play areas).

• Assessment of the calculated operational noise levels against the established noise criteria and recommendations to protect the noise amenity at the adjoining residential properties.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 1 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 1.3 Subject Site

The subject site is located at 202 Brooklands Drive in Beaudesert on the land described as Lot 501 on RP808820 within the Scenic Rim Regional Council (SRRC) local government area. The location of the proposed childcare centre is presented in Figure 1.1.

Proposed Childcare Centre 202 Brooklands Drive

Figure 1.1 Site Location

1.4 Proposed Development

The proposed childcare centre development will feature:

• Single-storey childcare centre building with capacity of 116 children, with one outdoor play area (designed as a playscape), seven indoor learning areas (activity rooms), two craft/store areas, two sleeping rooms, reception, staff room, office, kitchen, bathrooms and laundry;

• Ground floor (at grade) carparking (35 spaces), accessed from Brooklands Drive; and

• Service court (including waste bin area).

The proposed hours of operation are between 6:30am to 6:30pm, which are typical operating hours for childcare centres in Australia.

The development layout of the proposed childcare centre is presented in Appendix A.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 2 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

2. Existing Noise Amenity

2.1 Noise Measurement Locations

Noise measurements were carried out to obtain information about the existing traffic and general background noise levels at the proposed development site.

The noise measurement methodology is summarised in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 Noise Measurements The noise measurements were carried out in accordance with:

Relevant legislation, • Australian Standard AS 1055-2018 (Acoustics – Description and measurement of standards and environmental noise); and guidelines • Australian Standard AS 2702-1984 (Acoustics – Methods for the measurement of road traffic noise).

Traffic and background noise measurements were carried out on site at 202 Brooklands Drive Measurement location as presented in Figure 2.1. Photos showing the noise measurement location are presented in Appendix B. Continuous unattended noise measurements were carried out 24 hours a day from 25 to 31 Measurement period May 2020.

The following sound measurement equipment was used: • Environmental noise logger – ARL Ngara (serial no. 8780D4); and Measurement • Calibration – RION NC-74 sound level calibrator (serial no. 34615224). equipment The noise measurement instruments conform to Australian Standard AS/NZS IEC61672.1- 2019. Calibration was performed during set up and download of the data from the noise logger. The calibration drift was <0.1 dB(A).

The weather conditions during the monitoring period from 25 to 31 May 2020 were fine, with Meteorological no periods of inclement weather encountered. conditions Full meteorological data1 for the monitoring periods are presented in Appendix C.

Traffic Noise Impact Assessment: The noise measurement data was analysed to determine the following traffic noise descriptor:

• L10,18hr: L10 is the level of noise exceeded for 10% of any time period; L10,18hr is the typical traffic noise descriptor, and is the arithmetic average of 18 hourly L10,1hr levels over Analysis of data consecutive hours between 6am and 12am. Operational Noise Impact Assessment: The noise measurement data was analysed to determine the following operational noise descriptors:

• LA90,T: Background noise level during daytime (7am to 6pm), evening (6pm to 10pm) and night-time (10pm to 7am).

1 Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) daily weather observations as recorded at the Beaudesert Drumley Street station (040983).

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 3 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Proposed childcare centre 202 Brooklands Drive

Legend

Noise logger location

Figure 2.1 Noise measurement location

2.2 Unattended Noise Measurement Results

The results of the unattended noise measurements relevant for the traffic noise impact assessment carried out at 202 Brooklands Drive from 25 May 2020 to 1 June 2020 are presented in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2 Traffic Noise Measurement Results Traffic noise levels* Background noise levels*

Date L10,18hr L10,1hr max L90,18hr L90,8hr (6:00am-12:00am) (6:00am-12:00am) (6:00am-12:00am) (10:00pm-6:00am) 25 May 2020 (Mon) — — — 25.1 26 May 2020 (Tue) 55.3 60.4 37.5 24.4 27 May 2020 (Wed) 54.6 58.3 39.9 27.2 28 May 2020 (Thu) 55.6 59.5 41.7 28.9 29 May 2020 (Fri) 56.0 60.0 39.5 24.4 1 June 2020 (Mon) — — — — Arithmetic average 55.4 59.5 39.6 26.0 (weekdays only) *Façade adjusted

The results of the unattended noise measurements relevant for the operational noise impact assessment carried out at 202 Brooklands Drive from 25 May 2020 to 1 June 2020 are presented in Table 2.3.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 4 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Table 2.3 Operational Noise Measurement Results Background noise levels Date L90,11hr L90,4hr L90,9hr Day Evening Night (7:00am–6:00pm) (6:00pm–10:00pm) (10:00pm–7:00am) 25 May 2020 (Mon) — 29 27 26 May 2020 (Tue) 43 29 27 27 May 2020 (Wed) 42 38 29 28 May 2020 (Thu) 43 41 31 29 May 2020 (Fri) 43 35 26 30 May 2020 (Sat) 44 41 25 31 May 2020 (Sun) 43 37 28 1 June 2020 (Mon) — — — Arithmetic average 43 36 27 *Façade adjusted

Full summary of the noise measurement data, including full 1-hour traffic noise measurement data, is presented in Appendix D.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 5 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 3. Road Traffic Noise Impact Assessment

3.1 Road Traffic Noise Criteria

The proposed development is located near the Beaudesert-Nerang Road which is a State-controlled Transport Noise Corridor under administration by Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR). Traffic noise impacts on the noise sensitive development have to be assessed in accordance with the TMR Transport Noise Management Code of Practice, Volume 1 – Road Traffic Noise (November 2013).

The relevant traffic noise criteria are provided in the following documents:

• Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (DSDMIP), State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) version 2.6 (February 2020), State code 1: Development in state-controlled road environment; and • Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR), Policy for Development on Land Affected by Environmental Emissions from Transport and Transport Infrastructure Version 4 (October 2017).

The applicable criteria from the SDAP are presented in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Performance and Acceptable Outcomes (SDAP State Code 1) Performance outcome Acceptable outcome Noise Childcare centres and educational establishments PO25 AO25.1 Development involving a: A noise barrier or earth mound is provided which is designed, sited and constructed: 1. childcare centre; or 2. educational establishment 3. to meet the following external noise criteria at all façades of the building envelope: minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled road or a. ≤58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) façade corrected (maximum type 1 multi-modal corridor in indoor education areas and hour during normal opening hours) indoor play areas. 4. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic Noise), Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013. Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with the SDAP Supporting Information: Environmental emissions in a state-controlled road environment, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017. If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-comply setback distances for buildings stipulated by the local planning instrument or relevant building regulations should be used. In some instances, the design of noise barriers and mounds to achieve the noise criteria above the ground floor may not be reasonable or practicable. In these instances, any relaxation of the criteria is at the discretion of the Department of Transport and Main Roads. OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 6 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Performance outcome Acceptable outcome Noise Childcare centres and educational establishments AO25.2 Buildings which include indoor education areas and indoor play areas are setback the maximum distance possible from a state-controlled road or type 1 multimodal corridor. AND AO25.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so that indoor education areas and indoor play areas are located furthest from the state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor. AND AO25.4 Buildings are designed and constructed using materials which ensure indoor education areas and indoor play areas meet the following internal noise criteria:

1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during opening hours). Note: Noise levels from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997 Acoustics – Description and measurement of environmental noise. To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise assessment report, prepared in accordance with the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, is provided. PO25 AO26.1 Development involving a: A noise barrier or earth mound is provided which is designed, sited and constructed: 1. childcare centre; or 2. educational establishment 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in each outdoor education area or outdoor play area: minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled road or a. ≤63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field (between 6am type 1 multi-modal corridor in outdoor education areas and and 6pm) outdoor play areas. 2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice – Volume 1 (Road Traffic Noise), Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013. Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with the SDAP Supporting Information: Environmental emissions in a state-controlled road environment, Department of Transport and Main Roads 2017. OR AO26.2 Each outdoor education area and outdoor play area is shielded from noise generated from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free fence, or other solid gap-free structure.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 7 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

3.1.1 Acoustic Design – AS3671:1989

In case of exceedance of the external traffic noise criteria, architectural treatment must be applied to the external façade of the childcare centre building to protect the internal noise amenity. Conceptual acoustic design specifications to demonstrate compliance with the internal noise criteria are presented in Section 5 of this report.

3.1.2 Internal Noise Criteria

The internal noise criteria for childcare centres is presented in Table 3.2.

Table 3.2 Internal Traffic Noise Criteria Transport Location within Development type Internal noise criteria infrastructure development

Childcare centre or Indoor education 35dB(A) Leq,1hr State-controlled road educational areas and indoor (maximum hour during normal opening hours) establishment play areas

3.2 Traffic Noise Calculation Methodology

The noise levels at the proposed development, within a planning horizon of 10 years (year 2033), were calculated using SoundPLAN noise propagation modelling software.

SoundPLAN calculates traffic noise as per the procedure specified in the UK Department of Transport Welsh Office Method of Calculation of Road Traffic Noise (CoRTN’88). This is an accepted traffic noise calculation procedure applied widely in Australia.

The assumptions and data used in development of the traffic noise propagation model are presented in Table 3.3. Table 3.3 Data and Assumptions – Traffic Noise Model

• Elevation data for the property and surroundings were obtained from Department of Natural Resources and Mines Airborne Laser Scanning (LiDAR) 1 metre elevation data. • The design levels of the proposed development were provided by Pinnacle Engineering Terrain Group on 22 July 2020. • Ground surface absorption factor of 0 was applied to all paved surfaces and 1 for all grassed areas.

• The proposed childcare centre was included in the model along with neighbouring buildings. Buildings • Development plans are included in Appendix A.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 8 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 • Beaudesert-Nerang Road was included in the modelling, with alignment determined based on aerial imagery. The length of the road considered in the traffic noise modelling spans approximately 300m either side of the proposed development site. • Traffic volumes for Beaudesert-Nerang Road were sourced from the AADT Segment Report for Road Section 202 – Beaudesert-Nerang Road – Traffic Year 2018, sourced from TMR’s Traffic Analysis and Reporting System (TARS) on 8 July 2020. The AADT Segment Report is presented in Appendix E. The data for Segment Site 11427 located at 220m east of Brooklands Drive east is as follows:

o 2018 AADT of 6,353 vehicles per day; Road traffic o 10.47% heavy vehicles; and o 10-year annual growth rate of 3.54% per annum. • Beaudesert-Nerang Road is one lane in each direction as it passes the development site. • Speed limit on Beaudesert-Nerang Road is 100km/h. • Pavement surface type is spray seal (5-14mm Bituminous Seal). In accordance with the TMR CoP Vol. 1, 5-14mm Bituminous Seal requires a pavement surface correction factor of plus 1-3 dB(A). Based on site inspection observations a surface correction factor of plus 1 dB(A) was applied. • The CoRTN procedure requires traffic volume data input for 18 hours. Traffic volume for 18- hour period (6:00am to midnight) was considered as 94% of the 24-hour AADT.

• Building Façades: Receptors were attached to the façades of the proposed building. Receptors are placed at a height of 1.5m above each floor level. • SoundPLAN adds +2.5dB(A) to the calculated noise levels when the receptors are attached Receptors to the buildings, thus the tabulated traffic noise levels are façade adjusted. • Outdoor Play Areas: Receptors were placed at 1.5m above ground level within the outdoor play areas (north, south and alfresco) at a free-field location. • 1m grid spacing was used for calculation of noise contour maps.

Calculation • CoRTN ’88. procedure

Noise mitigation • Noise mitigation measures are discussed in detail in Section 6 of this report. measures

3.3 Traffic Flow Data

Traffic flow data, as considered in the SoundPLAN model, is presented in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4 Traffic Flow Data for Validation Traffic volumes Heavy vehicles Road 2033 AADT 2018 AADT 2020 AADT (10-year planning (%) horizon) Beaudesert-Nerang Road 6,353 6,402 10,063 10.47% Notes: 1. AADT – Average Annual Daily Traffic. 2. Traffic data for Beaudesert-Nerang Road was obtained from the TMR AADT Segment Report for Road Section 202 – Beaudesert-Nerang Road – Traffic Year 2018, traffic count site 11427 (220m east of Brooklands Drive east). 2020 and 2033 traffic flows are calculated based on 3.54% annual traffic growth.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 9 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 3.4 Road Traffic Noise Model Validation

The noise data collected during the monitoring period (as presented in Table 2.2) was used to validate the accuracy of the SoundPLAN model prior to undertaking calculations of the future road traffic noise levels. The results of the SoundPLAN model validation are presented in Table 3.5 and in Appendix F.

Table 3.5 SoundPLAN Traffic Noise Model Validation Results

L10,18hr dB(A)* Receptor Difference dB Validation factor Measured Calculated

Noise logger 55.4 56.9 +1.6 N/A

*Façade adjusted

The calculated road traffic noise level is within the acceptable tolerance of ±2dB, thus there is no need for the addition of a validation factor to the road traffic noise levels within the planning horizon (year 2033).

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 10 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Excerpt from the 3D SoundPLAN noise propagation model is presented in Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2.

DETAIL 1

Legend

Existing building Façade receiver

Floating screen

Free-field receiver Noise barrier fence Paved surface Proposed building Road (one way)

Figure 3.1 3D Traffic Noise Model – SoundPLAN Excerpt – Full Road Alignment

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 11 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Legend

Existing building Façade receiver

Floating screen Free-field receiver

Noise barrier fence Paved surface Proposed building Road (one way)

Figure 3.2 3D Traffic Noise Model – SoundPLAN Excerpt – Detail 1

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 12 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

3.5 Traffic Noise Calculation Results

3.5.1 External Façade Noise Criteria

The calculated traffic noise levels at the façades of the educational areas of the proposed childcare centre, assessed against the external façade noise criteria, are presented in Table 3.6.

Table 3.6 Traffic Noise Levels – Building Façades Compliance with Traffic noise level Receiver Room Façade ≤58dB(A) L10,1hr L10,1hr dB(A)* criterion? Activity 01 NE 62.5 No NE 63.2 No Activity 02 SE 60.6 No NE 60.8 No Activity 02 – Sleep SE 60.0 No SW 50.1 Yes NE 61.2 No Activity 03 NW 56.9 Yes NW 59.9 No 202 Brooklands Drive Activity 04 SE 51.9 Yes SW 51.6 Yes NW 61.3 No Activity 05 SE 56.1 Yes NW 62.0 No Activity 06 SE 56.0 Yes NE 64.4 No Activity 07 NW 64.0 No SE 59.0 No *façade adjusted

3.5.2 Outdoor Play Area Noise Criteria

The calculated traffic noise levels at the outdoor play areas of the proposed childcare centre, assessed against the outdoor play area noise criteria, are presented in Table 3.7.

Table 3.7 Traffic Noise Levels – Outdoor Play Areas Traffic noise level Compliance with ≤63dB(A) Receiver L10,12hr dB(A)* L10,12hr criterion? Playscape – North 62.4 Yes

Playscape – South 53.3 Yes

Playscape – Veranda 54.7 Yes *free field

Full tabulated results of the calculated traffic noise levels are presented in Appendix G.

Noise contours showing the propagation of traffic noise across the development site are presented in Appendix H.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 18 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 4. Operational Noise Impact Assessment

4.1 Nearest Noise Sensitive Land Uses

The nearest noise sensitive land uses to the subject site are the neighbouring residential dwellings, public buildings and parks, as listed in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Nearest Noise Sensitive Land Uses Approximate distance Street address Current / approved use (m) 4434 Beaudesert-Nerang Road Residential dwelling 195 192 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 110 194 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 90 198 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 45 201 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 130 205-207 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 80 209-211 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 60 215 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 62 217 Brooklands Drive Residential dwelling 85 2 Summerfield Drive Residential dwelling 135 5 Summerfield Drive Residential dwelling 125 9-13 Summerfield Drive Aged care centre 150

The nearest noise sensitive places are identified in Figure 4.1, overlaid over the zoning map from the Scenic Rim Planning Scheme.

Legend

Rural residential zone Community facilities zone Recreation and open space zone Nearest noise sensitive use Childcare centre

Figure 4.1 Nearest Noise Sensitive Land Uses

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 19 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 As per SRPS zone overlays, the development site is zoned as Rural Residential, with nearby noise sensitive land uses also zoned Rural Residential, Community Facilities and Recreation and Open Space.

4.2 Noise Criteria

4.2.1 Scenic Rim Regional Council Planning Scheme

The proposed development has a potential to impact on the noise amenity at the nearest noise sensitive land uses, thus the performance outcomes from the Scenic Rim Regional Council Planning Scheme – 9.3.7 General Development Provisions Code must be met. The performance and acceptable outcomes from the General Development Provisions Code relevant to acoustic amenity and noise are presented in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 Excerpt from General Development Provisions Code 9.3.7 General Development Provisions Code – Table 9.3.7.3.1 – Criteria for assessable development only Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Acoustic amenity and noise PO1 AO1 Development is located, designed, constructed 1. Development involves activities that are inaudible from an and operated to ensure that noise emissions do adjacent sensitive receiver or would not cause noise related not cause environmental harm or environmental harm or environmental nuisance sensitive environmental nuisance to sensitive receivers. receiver; or Note - this performance outcome also applies to noise 2. The emission of noise from the premises must not exceed the emissions generated by sensitive land uses, from following levels: sources such as communal areas, service areas, plant and equipment. Time period At a sensitive land At commercial use premises 7:00am-10:00pm Background +5dB(A) Background +10dB(A) 10:00pm-7:00am 35dB(A) Background +8dB(A) (sleeping areas) 10:00pm-7:00am 40dB(A) Background +8dB(A) (living areas) 10:00pm-7:00am Background +3dB(A) Background +8dB(A) (unless otherwise specified)

Note - (1) Levels are measured as the adjusted maximum sound pressure level as defined in the Noise Measurement Manual (Environmental Protection Agency, 2000). (2) Noise generated from vehicle movements on the site, including noise from entering or exiting the vehicle, shall not be considered when assessing the Acceptable Outcome AO1. (3) Background=LA90 OR; 3. Development achieves the Acoustic Quality Objectives for Sensitive Receptors listed within the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008. Note - where the adjacent sensitive land use is not listed in the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008, the development will achieve the noise levels specified in AO1 (2) PO2 AO2 Air conditioning units, refrigeration units and Roof-top mounted plant and equipment is located away from any other form of mechanical ventilation or surrounding sensitive land uses and is acoustically shielded to extraction systems do not adversely impact on maintain the background noise levels (L90) at the nearest sensitive the acoustic amenity of surrounding sensitive receiver. receivers.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 20 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Compliance with the noise criteria from the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 20192 will ensure compliance with the requirements of the General Development Provisions Code from the Scenic Rim Regional Council Planning Scheme.

4.2.2 Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019

Acoustic Quality Objectives

The Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019 identifies environmental values for the acoustic environment and sets acoustic quality objectives for sensitive receptors. The purpose of the acoustic quality objectives is to protect the acoustic amenity of the environment.

The criteria from Schedule 1 of the policy are presented in Table 4.3.

Table 4.3 Acoustic Quality Objectives Criteria

Sensitive Acoustic quality objectives Environmental Location Period receptor value LAeq,adj,1-hr LA10,adj,1-hr LA01,adj,1-hr Day time and Health and 35 40 45 evening wellbeing Health and Indoors wellbeing, in Night time 30 35 40 relation to the ability to sleep Dwelling Day time and Health and 50 55 65 evening wellbeing Health and Outdoors Night time, 37 42 47 wellbeing, in windows (30 + 7) (35 + 7) (40 + 7) relation to the ability partially open to sleep

The following is noted regarding the acoustic quality objectives:

• Under the Noise Policy, daytime is 7am to 6pm, evening is 6pm to 10pm and night-time is 10pm to 7am.

• The Noise Policy does not specify outdoor noise criteria for dwellings during night-time. However, the outdoor noise criteria have been derived from the internal criteria, assuming 7dB noise reduction by the building envelope with windows3.

• The assessment of compliance with the operational noise criteria is based on the results of the noise propagation modelling for a period of 1-hour with maximum noise emissions.

Background Creep Criteria

Controlling background creep4 is an important consideration under the Noise Policy and the background creep criteria states the following:

2 Table 9.3.7.3.1 of the General Development Provisions Code calls for compliance with the noise criteria from the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008, which has been superseded by the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019. 3 Typical noise reduction as stated in Planning for Noise Control Guideline, Dept. of Environment and Science (DES). 4 Background creep is defined as an increase in the background noise levels due to constant addition of new noise source in the environment. To prevent increase in the background noise level (L90,T), which is the main noise amenity descriptor, the Policy has stated noise limits which have to be complied with.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 21 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 To the extent that it is reasonable to do so, noise from an activity must not be

– For noise that is continuous noise measured by LA90,T – more than nil dB(A) greater

than the existing acoustic environment measured by LA90,T.

– For noise that varies over time measured by LAeq,adj,T – more than 5dB(A) greater than

the existing acoustic environment measured by LA90,T. Continuous noise is associated with mechanical plant or equipment with steady noise emissions. Time-varying noise is any noise that fluctuates over time, including car parking noise, patron noise, and amplified music.

The background creep criteria, based on the background levels at the site (refer to Section 2.2 of this report), are presented in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4 Background Creep Noise Criteria

Background creep criteria, LAeq,adj,T Noise characteristic Day Evening Night 7:00am to 6:00pm 6:00pm to 10:00pm 10:00pm to 7:00am 43 36 27 Continuous noise (LA90,adj,Day + 0) (LA90,adj,Day + 0) (LA90,adj,Day + 0) 48 41 32 Time-varying noise (LA90,adj,Day + 5) (LA90,adj,Day + 5) (LA90,adj,Day + 5)

4.3 Operational Noise Calculation Methodology

A 3D model of the site and surroundings was developed using SoundPLAN noise propagation software considering existing buildings adjacent to the site, proposed layout of the development and location and sound power levels of the dominant noise sources.

The calculations were carried out as per the procedures specified in the International Standard ISO9613 (Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors).

The calculation method for a single frequency is as follows:

LS = [ LW + K0 ] – [ AdI + Adiv + Agr + Abar + Aatm + dLrefl + dLw ]

Where: LS Sound pressure for a single frequency

LW Sound power of source

K0 Correction for propagation in limited spatial angle

ADI Mean directivity correction

Adiv Mean attenuation due to geometrical spreading

Agr Mean attenuation due to ground effect

Abar Mean attenuation due to screening

Aatm Mean attenuation due to air absorption

dLrefl Level increase due to reflections

dLw Correction due to source operation time

The noise propagation losses are calculated as a combination of distance attenuation (geometrical spreading), screening, ground attenuation and other factors.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 22 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

The results of noise modelling as per ISO9613 are in terms of Leq. A conversion factor was applied

to Leq to obtain results in terms of the other assessment criteria L10 and L01. The conversion factors are presented in Table 4.5.

Table 4.5 Noise Descriptor Conversion Factors Conversion factors Type of noise Leq to L10 Leq to L01

Non-continuous noise L10 = Leq + 3 dB L01 = Leq + 8 dB

Continuous noise L10 = Leq L01 = Leq

The assumptions and data used in development of the operational noise propagation model are presented in Table 4.6.

Table 4.6 Data and Assumptions – Operational Noise Model

Proposed • The proposed childcare centre, as per the drawings prepared by Raymond Design (RD20009, dated 21 July 2020) was considered in the SoundPLAN model. development • The proposed development layout is presented in Appendix A.

• Department of Natural Resources and Mines Airborne Laser Scanning (LiDAR) 1 metre data was used to determine the elevation of the development relative to the surrounds. • The design levels of the proposed development were provided by Pinnacle Engineering Terrain Group on 22 July 2020. • Ground surface absorption factor of 0 was applied to all paved surfaces and 1 for all grassed areas.

• Receptors were attached to the façades of the noise sensitive buildings at a height of 1.5m above each floor level. Calculation • SoundPLAN adds +2.5dB(A) to the calculated noise levels when the receptors are attached receptors to the buildings, thus the tabulated operational noise levels are façade adjusted. • 5m grid spacing was used for calculation of noise contour maps.

Noise sources and • Refer to Section 4.4. operating times

Noise control • The recommended noise control measures are discussed in Section 5 of this report. measures

• 3D model of the subject site and surroundings was developed using cadastral data in Distance SoundPLAN. The source-receiver distances and geometrical spreading are automatically calculated in SoundPLAN to a high level of accuracy in accordance with the ISO9613 attenuation procedure. • Distances and attenuation values are presented in Appendix I.

• Some of the neighbouring properties are shielded by intervening buildings and Barrier attenuation topographical features which act as noise barriers. The barrier attenuation has been calculated in SoundPLAN to a high level of accuracy in accordance with the ISO9613 and screening procedure. • Barrier attenuation values are presented in Appendix I.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 23 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

• Sound reflecting surfaces such as pavement are modelled with ground absorption Ground coefficient of 0 (no absorption). Grassed and vegetated areas are modelled with ground attenuation absorption coefficient of 1 (100% absorption) in accordance with ISO9613. • Ground attenuation values are presented in Appendix I.

4.4 Noise Sources

Details of the noise sources at the proposed development, with a potential to impact on the adjacent land uses, are presented in Table 4.7.

Table 4.7 Noise Sources

Operational Sound power level Tonality/ Location Operational scenario noise source dB(A) (re 10-12W) impulsiveness Day (7:00am to 6:00pm) SoundPLAN calculates5 noise • 35 car movements per hour emissions from parking areas during peak periods (7:00am to based on the number of parking 9:00am and 4:00pm to 6:00pm). bays, surface type, and the type of 20 car movements per hour at parking lot, and considers the other times. impact noise of a car door closing – At grade Evening (6:00pm to 10:00pm) +5dB for Car park ‘slam’. carparking The data input for the car parks is • 16 car movements per hour impulsiveness as follows: during 6:00pm to 6:30pm. Not in use at other times. • No. Parking Bays: 35 Night (10:00pm to 7:00am) • Surface Type: Concrete paving • 16 car movements per hour • Parking Lot Type: Staff and during 6:30am to 7:00am. Not in visitors use at other times. The sound power levels are estimated based on the Guideline for Child Care Centre Acoustic Day (7:00am to 6:00pm) Assessment by the Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants • 58 children outdoors during peak (AAAC). times (8:00am to 12:00pm and The data input for the outdoor play 2:00pm to 3:00pm). • 29 children outdoors during off Children Outdoor play areas is as follows: peak times (7:00am to 8:00am, n/a playing areas • Number of children outdoors at one time: 58 total (50% of 12:00pm to 2:00pm and 3:00pm maximum capacity of 116) to 6:00pm). Evening and night (6:00pm to • Total sound power level: 7:00am) 92dB(A) • Not in use. • 0 to 2 years: 80dB(A) • 2 to 3 years: 86dB(A) • 3 to 6 years: 87dB(A) Operating hours (6:30am to 65dB(A) per unit (8 units total) 6:30pm) A/C ATP Library: Daikin outdoor • Continuous use. +5dB for condenser Service area condenser - 4MXS80EVMAl (point Outside operating hours (6:30pm to tonality unit source) 6:30am) • Not in use. Operating hours (6:30am to 71dB(A) 6:30pm) Kitchen • Continuous use. +5dB for Rooftop ATP Library: Small size exhaust commercial exhaust fan unit (point Outside operating hours (6:30pm to tonality source) 6:30am) • Not in use.

5 SoundPLAN uses the methodology of the Bavarian parking lot study (2007) to calculate car park noise emissions. (Bavarian State Agency for the Environment 2007, Parking Area Noise, 6th Edition, Bavarian State Ministry for the Environment, Germany).

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 24 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Operational Sound power level Tonality/ Location Operational scenario noise source dB(A) (re 10-12W) impulsiveness

At grade 91dB(A) Deliveries Delivery truck carparking – +5dB for ATP Library: Truck idling (point • 2 minutes between 7:00am and (idling) entrance to tonality source) 8:00am. centre At grade 91dB(A) Refuse collection Refuse truck carparking – +5dB for ATP Library: Truck idling (point • 2 minutes between 7:00am and (idling) entrance to tonality source) 8:00am. carpark At grade 92dB(A) Refuse collection Refuse truck carparking – +5dB for ATP Library: Refuse wagon loading • 2 minutes between 7:00am and (loading) entrance to impulsiveness (point source) 8:00am. carpark

Excerpt from the SoundPLAN 3D noise propagation model is presented in Figure 4.2.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 25 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Legend

Carpark

Existing building Façade receiver

Floating screen Noise barrier fence Noise source (area) Noise source (point)

Proposed building

Figure 4.2 SoundPLAN Operational Noise Model

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 26 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 4.5 Operational Noise Calculation Results

4.5.1 EPP 2019 – Acoustic Quality Objectives

The highest calculated noise levels at the most exposed façades of the nearest noise sensitive places, relative to the acoustic quality objectives, are presented in Table 4.8.

Table 4.8 Operational Noise Levels – Acoustic Quality Objectives Calculated noise levels Complies Receiver name Leq,Adj,1hr Leq,Adj,1hr Leq,Adj,1hr L10,Adj,1hr L10,Adj,1hr L10,Adj,1hr L01,Adj,1hr L01,Adj,1hr L01,Adj,1hr with noise Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Day Evening Night criteria? dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) EPP Noise 2019 acoustic quality objectives (external 50 50 37 55 55 42 65 65 47 criteria) for dwellings: 192 Brooklands Drive 32 22 22 35 25 25 40 30 30 Yes

194 Brooklands Drive 33 24 24 36 27 27 41 32 32 Yes

198 Brooklands Drive 41 32 32 44 35 35 49 40 40 Yes

2 Summerfield Drive 32 22 22 35 25 25 40 30 30 Yes

201 Brooklands Drive 33 24 24 36 27 27 41 32 32 Yes

205-207 Brooklands Drive 39 29 29 42 32 32 47 37 37 Yes

209-211 Brooklands Drive 40 31 31 43 34 34 48 39 39 Yes

215 Brooklands Drive 40 31 31 43 34 34 48 39 39 Yes

217 Brooklands Drive 36 28 28 39 31 31 44 36 36 Yes

4434 Beaudesert-Nerang Road 28 16 16 31 19 19 36 24 24 Yes

5 Summerfield Drive 33 25 25 36 28 28 41 33 33 Yes

9-13 Summerfield Drive 31 22 22 34 25 25 39 30 30 Yes

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 27 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

4.5.2 EPP 2019 – Background Creep Criteria

The highest calculated noise levels at the most exposed façades of the nearest noise sensitive places, relative to the background creep criteria, are presented in Table 4.9.

Table 4.9 Operational Noise Levels – Background Creep Criteria Calculated noise levels Complies Receiver name Leq,adj,11hr Leq,adj,4hr Leq,adj,9hr with noise Day Evening Night criteria? dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) EPP Noise 2019

background creep (external criteria): Continuous noise 43 36 27 Time-varying noise 48 41 32 192 Brooklands Drive 29 16 13 Yes

194 Brooklands Drive 31 18 14 Yes

198 Brooklands Drive 40 26 22 Yes

2 Summerfield Drive 30 16 12 Yes

201 Brooklands Drive 31 18 14 Yes

205-207 Brooklands Drive 36 23 20 Yes

209-211 Brooklands Drive 36 25 21 Yes

215 Brooklands Drive 36 25 21 Yes

217 Brooklands Drive 34 22 19 Yes

4434 Beaudesert-Nerang Road 26 10 6 Yes

5 Summerfield Drive 32 19 15 Yes

9-13 Summerfield Drive 29 16 12 Yes

Full tabulated results of the operational noise assessment are presented in Appendix I.

Noise contour maps showing the propagation of noise from the development are presented in Appendix J.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 28 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 5. Discussion and Recommendations

5.1 Noise Propagation Modelling Results

5.1.1 Traffic Noise Impact Assessment

The specifications for the construction of the noise barrier fence are presented in Section 5.3 of this report.

The highest calculated traffic noise level at the outdoor play areas is 62.4 dB(A) L10,12hr (free-field),

centre is 64.4 dB(A) L10,1hr (façade corrected). The traffic noise levels exceed the criterion of 58 dB(A)

L10,1hr (façade corrected), thus architectural treatment is required to the building of the proposed childcare centre, as per Section 5.2 of this report.

5.1.2 Operational Noise Impact Assessment

Detailed noise propagation modelling was carried out to assess potential noise impacts from the operation of the proposed childcare centre on the nearest noise sensitive land uses.

In the 3D noise propagation model, all proposed activities at the site were considered including car parking, deliveries, waste collection, mechanical plant (air conditioning condensers and kitchen exhaust), and the use of the outdoor play areas.

The relevant noise criteria from the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019 was considered in this assessment. The results of the noise propagation modelling indicate that without noise control measures, there is a potential for noise impacts on the nearest noise sensitive receptors from the operation of the childcare centre.

The specifications for the construction of the acoustic barriers (noise barrier fences) are presented in Section 5.2 of this report.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 29 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 5.2 Noise Control Measures

5.2.1 Noise Attenuation Structures – Noise Barrier Fences

There is a requirement to protect the noise amenity at the outdoor play areas from traffic noise impact. In addition, there is a requirement to mitigate potential noise impacts from the use of the outdoor play areas on the nearest noise sensitive land uses.

To achieve the noise amenity protection objectives, it is recommended to construct a noise barrier fence (1.8m high) along the perimeter of the outdoor play areas.

The noise barrier fence along the perimeter of the outdoor play areas have a dual purpose, as follows:

• Protection of the noise amenity at the outdoor play areas from traffic noise emissions; and

• Containment of the noise emissions associated with children playing at the outdoor play areas.

The RLs at the base and top of the proposed noise barrier are presented in Table 5.1.

It should be noted that the RLs at the base of the noise barrier fences are the finished surface levels for the outdoor play areas (playscape) as per the development layout.

Table 5.1 Noise Barrier RLs

RL (m) X (m) Y (m) Height of noise RL (m) Base of noise (Easting) (Northing) barrier (m) Top of noise barrier barrier

503063.56 6903571.27 117.10 1.80 118.90 503066.54 6903576.75 117.10 1.80 118.90 503066.51 6903576.89 117.10 1.80 118.90 503064.33 6903578.08 117.10 1.80 118.90 503067.18 6903583.34 117.10 1.80 118.90 503069.57 6903587.73 117.10 1.80 118.90 503071.95 6903592.13 117.10 1.80 118.90 503074.34 6903596.52 117.10 1.80 118.90 503076.73 6903600.91 117.10 1.80 118.90 503079.11 6903605.31 117.02 1.80 118.82 503081.50 6903609.70 117.00 1.80 118.80 503083.88 6903614.10 116.90 1.80 118.70 503086.27 6903618.49 116.90 1.80 118.70 503087.60 6903620.95 116.90 1.80 118.70 503092.24 6903620.50 116.80 1.80 118.60 503096.61 6903620.08 116.80 1.80 118.60 503100.27 6903619.72 116.80 1.80 118.60 503102.61 6903615.91 116.70 1.80 118.50 503105.22 6903611.64 116.70 1.80 118.50 503107.83 6903607.38 116.60 1.80 118.40

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 30 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

RL (m) X (m) Y (m) Height of noise RL (m) Base of noise (Easting) (Northing) barrier (m) Top of noise barrier barrier

503110.44 6903603.12 116.60 1.80 118.40 503113.06 6903598.85 116.60 1.80 118.40 503115.67 6903594.59 116.50 1.80 118.30 503118.28 6903590.33 116.50 1.80 118.30 503119.61 6903588.15 116.50 1.80 118.30

The noise barrier fence must be constructed so that the RL at the top of the noise barrier is equal to or greater than the RLs shown in Table 5.1.

The recommended noise barrier fence must comply with:

• Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) Technical Specification Transport and Main Roads Specifications MRTS15 Noise Fences, dated March 2019; and

• TMR Road Traffic Noise Management: Code of Practice, Chapter 7: Integrated Noise Barrier Design.

It is important to consider all requirements under MRTS15, which must be taken into consideration at the detailed design stage.

The height of the noise barrier fence can be modified as required to meet the other design requirements, provided that the minimum RLs at the top of each segment as shown in Table 5.1 are achieved.

With the noise barrier fence along the perimeter of the outdoor play areas, full compliance will be

achieved with the traffic noise criterion of 63 dB(A) L10,12hr (free-field) at the play areas.

The operational noise propagation modelling indicates that the noise barrier fence along the perimeter of the outdoor play areas also provide protection for the noise amenity at the nearest noise sensitive receptors.

The alignments and height of the recommended noise barrier fence is presented in Figure 5.1.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 31 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Legend 1.8m high noise barrier fence

●X.XX RL - Top of noise barrier (m)

Figure 5.1 Alignment of the Recommended Noise Barrier Fence

5.2.2 Acoustic Design of the Childcare Building Façade

The highest calculated traffic noise level at the façades of the educational areas of the proposed

childcare centre is 64.4 dB(A) L10,1hr (façade corrected), which exceeds the criterion of 58 dB(A) L10,1hr (façade corrected).

It is impractical to construct noise barriers to meet the noise criteria on the external façades, thus architectural treatment is required to the building façades exposed to road traffic noise from

Beaudesert-Nerang Road to achieve compliance with the internal noise criteria of 35 dB(A) Leq,1hr.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 32 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Conceptual acoustic design calculations were carried out as per the procedure from AS3671-1989

to determine the weighted sound reduction indices (Rw) for the construction of the external walls, windows and roof/ceilings of the childcare centre building.

5.2.3 Internal Noise Criteria (Design Internal Noise Levels)

The internal noise criteria for childcare centres is presented in Table 5.2.

Table 5.2 Internal Traffic Noise Criteria Transport Location within Development type Internal noise criteria infrastructure development

Childcare centre or Indoor education 35dB(A) Leq,1hr State-controlled road educational areas and indoor (maximum hour during normal opening hours) establishment play areas

Traffic noise attenuation calculations were carried out considering three construction elements (external walls, roof/ceilings and windows) for each of the 7 activity rooms of the proposed childcare centre.

The results of the noise attenuation calculations for the proposed childcare development are presented in Appendix K.

5.3 Acoustic Design Specifications

5.3.1 External Walls

Based on the results of the traffic noise attenuation calculations the highest Rw for the external walls are:

• Activity Room 1: - Rw 30;

• Activity Room 2: - Rw 36;

• Activity Room 3: - Rw 33;

• Activity Room 4: - Rw 31;

• Activity Room 5: - Rw 29;

• Activity Room 6: - Rw 30; and

• Activity Room 7: - Rw 36.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 33 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

The external walls of the proposed childcare must be constructed as specified in Table 5.3.

Table 5.3 Recommended Construction for the External Walls

Rw rating Recommended lightweight construction required

• 1 layer of selected external weatherboard (Hardie’s Linea) cladding with minimum surface Ground Floors density of 12.5 kg/m2; Rw 29 and 31 • 70mm steel or timber studs; and • 1 layer of 10mm thick gypsum plasterboard internally.

• 1 layer of selected external weatherboard (Hardie’s Linea) cladding with minimum surface 2 Ground Floors density of 12.5 kg/m ; • 70mm steel or timber studs; Rw 33 to 36 • 75mm thick Bradford Gold Batts (or equivalent) R1.8 cavity insulation; and • 1 layer of 10mm thick gypsum plasterboard internally.

5.3.2 Roof/Ceilings

The roof/ceiling construction for the proposed childcare centre building requires a maximum Rw of 38, and should as a minimum comprise of:

• Metal roof sheeting over steel or timber purlin; • 140mm Bradford Gold Batts (or equivalent) R2.5 cavity insulation; and • Single layer of 10mm gypsum plasterboard internally.

5.3.3 Windows

The calculated Rw ratings for the windows of the proposed childcare centre building, considering all activity rooms) are presented in Appendix L.

5.3.4 Ventilation

The internal noise criteria at the proposed childcare centre building can only be achieved with the windows closed. Therefore, mechanical ventilation, such as ducted air-conditioning system, must be installed to provide ventilation to all rooms at the proposed childcare centre.

The mechanical ventilation system must be appropriately sized to ensure sufficient air circulation as per the requirements of AS1668.2-2012. The ventilation should be designed so that the acoustic performance of the building envelope is not compromised.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 34 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

5.3.5 Mechanical Plant

At this stage in the project, the location and specifications of the mechanical equipment is not yet finalised. Selection of noise attenuation measures will need to be carried out at the detailed design stage. The following general recommendations should be considered for the design and installation of mechanical equipment:

• Select equipment with low sound power levels;

• Locate equipment as far away from noise sensitive areas as possible;

• Construct solid acoustic screens or enclosures around equipment to screen it from noise sensitive areas;

• Where equipment has directional noise characteristics, point equipment away from noise sensitive areas; and

• Provide acoustic lining to inside of ventilation ducts and/or provide duct silencers.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 35 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

6. Conclusions

Based on the results of the noise impact assessment for the proposed childcare centre at 202 Brooklands Drive in, Beaudesert the following is concluded:

• Within a 10-year planning horizon, there is a potential for traffic noise impact on the facades of the educational rooms located closest to Beaudesert-Nerang Road and on the outdoor play areas.

• The activities at the proposed childcare centre have a potential to impact on the nearest noise sensitive receptors.

• To achieve the noise amenity protection objectives, it is recommended to construct a noise barrier fence (1.8m high) along the perimeter of the outdoor play areas. The RLs at the base and top of the proposed noise barrier fence are presented in Table 5.1 of this report. The alignment and height of the recommended noise barrier fence are presented in Figure 5.1 of this report.

• It is impractical to construct noise barriers to meet the noise criteria on the external façades, thus architectural treatment is required to the building façades exposed to road traffic noise from Beaudesert-Nerang Road to achieve compliance with the internal noise criteria of 35

dB(A) Leq,1hr.

• Conceptual acoustic design calculations were carried out as per the procedure from AS3671-

1989 to determine the weighted sound reduction indices (Rw) for the construction of the external walls, windows and roof/ceilings of the childcare centre building.

• To ensure compliance with the internal noise criteria the building envelope of proposed childcare centre building must be constructed as per the acoustic design specifications presented in Section 5.3 and Appendices K and L of this report.

• The internal noise criteria at the proposed childcare centre building can only be achieved with the windows closed. Therefore, mechanical ventilation, such as ducted air-conditioning system, must be installed to provide ventilation to all rooms at the proposed childcare centre.

• Air conditioning condenser units, kitchen exhaust fans or refrigeration compressors (if applicable) and all other mechanical equipment must be appropriately screened and attenuated to ensure that the noise levels at the nearest noise sensitive land uses comply with the noise criteria.

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 36 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

7. References

• Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants, 2013, Guideline for Child Care Centre Acoustic Assessment

• Australian Standard AS 1055:2018 (Acoustics – Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise)

• Australian Standard AS 1055.2-1997 (Acoustics – Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise Part 2: Application to Specific Situations)

• Australian Standard AS2702-1984 (Acoustics – Methods for the measurement of road traffic noise)

• Australian Standard AS/NZS2107-2016 (Acoustics – Recommended design sound levels and reverberation times for building interiors)

• Australian Standard AS3671-1989 (Acoustics – Road Traffic Noise Intrusion – Building sitting and construction)

• Australian Standard AS/NZS IEC61672.1-2019 (Electroacoustics – Sound level meters – Specifications)

• Department of State Development Infrastructure and Planning, July 2019, State Development Assessment Provisions (Version 2.6), State Code 1: Development in a state- controlled road environment

• Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013, Transport Noise Management Code of Practice: Volume 1 – Road Traffic Noise

• Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017, Development Affected by Environmental Emissions from Transport Policy (Version 4)

• International Standard ISO9613 (Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors)

• Queensland Government, Environmental Protection Act 1994

• Queensland Government, Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019

• Queensland Government, ‘Queensland Development Code (QDC) MP4.4 (Buildings in a Transport Noise Corridor)’

• Scenic Rim Regional Council, 2020, Scenic Rim Planning Scheme 2020

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 37 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

8. Appendices

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Page 38 Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix A – Development Layout

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 C p. (07) 5538 4394 proposed 116 place childcare centre m. 0418 666 922 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert. c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466

proposal car parking - 116 place childcare centre childcare centre r.p.d. required - 1/8 children + 1/staff = 34.5 spaces required lot 501 on RP 808820 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert. total spaces provided - local authority scenic rim regional council - 35 spaces inc. disabled bay site area - 4123 sqm site cover - 1153.7 sqm (27.9 %) index to sheets gross floor area - 787.9 sqm building area 01. face sheet/site data

site data / analysis total GFA area - 787.9 sqm 02. site context plan roofed playscape/verandas - 358.3 sqm 03. part site plan A roofed safety zone area - 7.5 sqm 04. part site plan B childcare centre 05. floor plan no. of children - 116 no. of activity rooms - 7 06. elevations staff 07. elevations - 20 contact 08. 3D persepctives playscape required - 812.0 sqm provided - 1151 sqm

development statement area calculations built environment all area calculations are based on design and are the development will comply with the requirements of subject to final design development. final figures the Scenic Rim Regional Council , the NCC 2019 Vol shall accord with minimums or maximums allowed 1 and the National Quality Framework and by council and shall not vary by more than 5% of standards. that stated garbage collection car parking garbage is to be collected on site, bulk bins to be all car parking and access shall accord with stored in screened service area AS2890.1

locality plan site location 01. face sheet/site data proposed childcare centre, 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert, qld.

0 m note: this proposal is subject to site survey and development approval(s) from the relevant authority. not to scale this drawing shall not be copied or used without authorisation and is protected by copyright. RD20009 : may_2020 issue A - 21/07/20 north drawn - c. c. r. Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 C p. (07) 5538 4394 m. 0418 666 922

proposed 116 place c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466 childcare centre beaudesert nerang road

m.g.a. true north true existing

residential PM WI NT UN E S R dwelling R S E U T N N I A S W M U brooklands drive M M

M E S P R U

M N B

M U R

E S E

E Z

S E

west E east

U S

W N

S P

A M

E S

- D

S I

E W

T A

T S

W B

U R

S S

M E R south solar aspect

existing existing easement residential dwelling

existing residential dwelling existing existing residential residential dwelling dwelling

brooklands drive

existing residential dwelling

existing residentialsite context plan dwelling

02. site context plan proposed childcare centre, 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert, qld.

114.358 114.011 C 115.375 p. (07) 5538 4394 billboard m. 0418 666 922

162°43'40" 115 113.663 115.365 42.847 11.261

114 c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466

115.167

114.048 sign 86°28'20" batter land application area 113.493 170°21'50" 2.0 FSL. 116.800 3.773 113.742 116.298 F5 FSL. 115.600 Valve 185°37'50" 2.0 3.773 116.269 F5 113.966 Valve 501 116.130 116.566 RP808820 Valve 116 200°53'50" 3.773 116.697 outdoor playscape Valve 114.112 2.0 2.0 Telstra 113.333 F5 area - 789 sqm F5 114.197 4000

115 114 FSL. 117.00 113.278 16.403 2.0 batter 208°31'50" F5 veranda FSL. 115.600 114.758 GP SL:113.22 2.0 FSL. 116.500 IL:112.02 F5

117 113.263 113.493

116.971 veranda 2.0

post & wire fence FFL. 116.850 F5 planter FSL. 117.000FSL.

115.181 113.319

1.8 F5 FFL 116.900 FFL 117.200 roofed playscape area - 362 sqm 114.869 113.515 EmtB FSL. 117.150 RP98994

169°23' 15.745

117.747 pool fencing to bio-basin perimater of 118 alfresco bio-basin 116.400

179°16'20" 3.618 114.611 113.900 rampdown

1.8 18 1000 F5 199°03'10" 3.618 access 114.802 3331 FFL 117.20 17 wheel stops turning bay 2700 drop off bays 218°49'50" 114.239 16 typical 3.618 89.402 F1 19°26'30" 19 safety F2 zone 15 20 03. sign 114.815 part site plan A proposed childcare centre, 20217.123 brooklands drive, beaudesert, qld.

0 10m note: this proposal is subject to site survey and development approval(s) from the relevant authority. 1:200 (A3) this drawing shall not be copied or used without authorisation and is protected by copyright. RD20009 : may_2020 issue A - 21/07/20 north drawn - c. c. r. Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 pool fencing to 118.139 bio-basin perimater of C 118 alfresco bio-basin p. (07) 5538 4394 116.400 m. 0418 666 922

179°16'20" 3.618 114.611 rampdown

c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466 1.8 18 1000 F5 199°03'10" 3.618 access 114.802 3331 FFL 117.20 17 1500 wheel stops turning bay 2700 sign drop off bays 218°49'50" 114.239 16 typical 3.618 114.312 89.402 F1 5400

19°26'30" 114.307 19 113.844 safety F2 zone 15 2600 6200 typical 20 114.492 3580 115 sign 114.815 14 17.123 retaining walls to eng's 21 drop off bays design, final locations & 5400 114.253 PWD space & F2 119 118.851 heights to be confirmed loading bay to wheel stops 22 114.808 AS2890.6 2009 1500 staff DRIVE breakout bollard GP SL:114.88 F3 13 23 IL:112.78

service 12 228°43'10" court 115.143 11 F2 119.781 24 F3 arbour frame 114.826 10 over pathway 6 staff parking bays 25 9 2600 1.8 fence & F5 typical 26 116.194 116 garden bed retaining wall access F2 8 1.8 driveway 27 drop off bays 115.784 F5 7 RP98994 1.8 car parking & access wheel stops 21.826 F5 garden bed 6 to AS2890.1 & local wheel stops authority requirements F2 120 staff only 115.904 5 116.914 4 6000 6 staff parking bays 2.5x2.0m sight splay 3 249°20'10" 117 area to be kept clear of 115.739 F2 2 obstructions 28 1 29 refuse 116.711 117.732 3 119.951 2600 2500 new vehicle crossing to 30 07. local authority requirements 5400 typical typical 31 117.8821500 121 line marking to local 117.989 entry/exit 116.868 authority requirements 32 Telstra 33 F2 118 117.430 8 staff parking bays F2 34 wheel stops 117.732 116.613 6200 35 33.775 F2 fully roofed & screened bin storage & washdown area BROOKLANDS 119 117.902 F2 117.171 5400 259°0'

120.051 retaining walls to eng's design, refer to civil plans 1500 117.603 F2 120 F2

120.924 119.916 Padmount Water meter Conc Base 120.977

121

Conc:122.18 121.595 120.019 526 04. part site plan B proposed childcare centre, 202 brooklands drive,RP808820 beaudesert, qld.

0 12.5m note: this proposal is subject to site survey and development approval(s) from the relevant authority. 1:250 (A3) this drawing shall not be copied or used without authorisation and is protected by copyright. RD20009 : may_2020 issue A - 21/07/20 north drawn - c. c. r. Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 C p. (07) 5538 4394 m. 0418 666 922

3 veranda c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466 4 2

1 FSL. 117.100 FSL. 116.800 1A activity 07 22 children veranda elevations 3 - 5 yrs 77.00 FFL. 116.850

craft/store toilet/change change activity 01 activity 02 12 children 12 children 0 - 2 yrs 0 - 2 yrs activity 06 43.08 44.14 bottle 22 children playscape activity 03 3 - 5 yrs 12 children prep 77.04 0 - 3 yrs 41.58 FFL 117.200 FSL. 117.150 sleep bottle change prep staffwc activity 05 sleep 20 children FFL 116.900 2 - 4 yrs 77.00 store kitchen

craft/store toilet/change rampdown

activity 04 activity room schedule 16 children access 2 - 4 yrs 77.04 activity age no. of required actual educator to playscape area foyer room children area (m2) area (m2) child ratios (7m2 per child) reception

safety 01 0 - 2 yrs 12 39 43.08 1 : 4 84 zone floor plan office 02 0 - 2 yrs 12 39 44.14 1 : 4 84 03 0 - 3 yrs 12 39 41.58 1 : 4 84 total GFA area - 787.9 sqm roofed playscape/verandas - 358.3 sqm planning 04 2 - 4 yrs 16 52 77.04 1 : 5 112 roofed safety zone area - 7.5 sqm staff room 05 2 - 4 yrs 20 65 77.00 1 : 5 140 PWD wc 06 3 - 5 yrs 22 71.5 77.04 1 : 11 154 07 3 - 5 yrs 22 71.5 77.00 1 : 11 154 staff laundry breakout 116 377 436.88 812

service court 05. floor plan proposed childcare centre, 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert, qld.

c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466

colorbond roof feature gable childcare signage weatherboard treatment panelling max ridge height

u/s trusses 119.940 m 6247

upper floor level 117.200 m n.g.l lower floor level 116.900 m

elevation 1

feature gable treatment childcare signage colorbond roof weatherboard panelling max ridge height

u/s trusses 119.940 m 7933 upper floor level 117.200 m lower floor level 116.900 m n.g.l

elevation 1A

feature gable childcare signage colorbond roof weatherboard treatment panelling max ridge height

u/s trusses 119.940 m 7108 upper floor level 117.200 m

lower floor level 116.900 m n.g.l elevation 2 06. elevations proposed childcare centre, 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert, qld.

0 10m note: this proposal is subject to site survey and development approval(s) from the relevant authority. 1:200 (A3) this drawing shall not be copied or used without authorisation and is protected by copyright. RD20009 : may_2020 issue A - 21/07/20 drawn - c. c. r. Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 C p. (07) 5538 4394 m. 0418 666 922

c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466

feature verandah feature gable colorbond roof weatherboard frieze treatment panelling max ridge height

u/s trusses 119.940 m 7862 upper floor level 117.200 m lower floor level 116.900 m n.g.l

elevation 3

feature verandah feature gable weatherboard frieze treatment colorbond roof panelling

u/s trusses 119.940 m

upper floor level 117.200 m lower floor level 116.900 m

elevation 4

70 70 colorbond roof colorbond roof 3210 2150 Elevation 2 07. 07. 70 colorbond gutter colorbond gutter r.c slab graded 70 5 - a to floor waste weatherboard 6 weatherboard panelling Elevation 4 bucket - a panelling Elevation 3 trap bin store gates - a 7 - 07. a signage Elevation4 1 Elevation 1 - a Elevation 2 - a Elevation 3 - a Elevation 4 - a 07. bin store plan 07. elevations proposed childcare centre, 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert, qld.

0 10m note: this proposal is subject to site survey and development approval(s) from the relevant authority. 1:200 (A3) this drawing shall not be copied or used without authorisation and is protected by copyright. RD20009 : may_2020 issue A - 21/07/20 drawn - c. c. r. Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 C p. (07) 5538 4394 m. 0418 666 922

c.c. raymond QBCC lisc. no. 1178466

3D View 1

3D View 2

3D View 3 08. 3D persepctives proposed childcare centre, 202 brooklands drive, beaudesert, qld.

0 m note: this proposal is subject to site survey and development approval(s) from the relevant authority. not to scale this drawing shall not be copied or used without authorisation and is protected by copyright. RD20009 : may_2020 issue A - 21/07/20 drawn - c. c. r. Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix B – Site Photos

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Photo 1: Noise logger location at 202 BroklandsDrive in Beaudesert (view due south-east)

Photo 2: Noise logger location at 202 BroklandsDrive in Beaudesert (view due north-east)

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix C – Meteorological Data

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Beaudesert, Queensland May 2020 Daily Weather Observations Observations from a site in Drumley Street, about 1.5 km northwest of the town centre.

Temps Max wind gust 9am 3pm Rain Evap Sun Date Day Min Max Dirn Spd Time Temp RH Cld Dirn Spd MSLP Temp RH Cld Dirn Spd MSLP °C °C mm mm hours km/h local °C % eighths km/h hPa °C % eighths km/h hPa 12.8Fr1 23.2 0 30W 13:19 17.7 45 SW 11 1015.2 22.6 30 WNW 15 1011.2 Sa2 2.6 23.3 0 WSW 35 13:39 16.5 52 WSW 13 1015.1 22.4 31 20W 1010.9 Su3 6.8 24.4 0 SW 30 12:12 19.1 50 SW 17 1016.0 23.7 30 SSW 9 1014.5 Mo4 4.1 24.9 0 SW 30 12:55 19.1 48 SSW 19 1023.1 23.8 36 SW 13 1020.1 7.2Tu5 24.6 0 SE 33 13:41 19.5 53 SW 15 1025.8 20.6 51 17S 1024.1 We6 13.6 25.8 0 SSE 39 13:54 20.5 73 SSW 9 1027.9 24.5 52 SE 11 1024.5 9.6Th7 0 18.4 82 Calm 1024.6 Fr8 27.6 36 WNW 6 1018.9 Sa9 11.0 27.7 NNE 19 13:26 20.2 79 Calm 1020.9 26.4 45 NNW 6 1016.1 Su10 12.8 26.5 1.4 22W 14:18 17.2 100 Calm 1018.7 25.4 37 11W 1015.7 Mo11 13.2 22.7 0 SW 35 12:07 18.1 43 SSW 17 1023.3 21.8 38 SSW 17 1021.3 10.4Tu12 23.4 0 SW 30 10:09 18.3 59 SSW 9 1025.6 20.8 61 SSE 7 1022.7 We13 8.8 25.0 0 20N 13:33 15.8 82 SSW 4 1024.9 23.8 55 NNE 9 1020.5 11.8Th14 25.7 0 SW 24 12:03 19.1 73 SW 4 1023.3 23.7 48 ENE 6 1020.3 11.5Fr15 23.2 0.2 SSW 35 14:02 18.4 65 15S 1025.1 22.6 41 15S 1021.6 Sa16 12.6 23.5 0 SSW 35 13:50 19.9 64 SSW 19 1025.5 21.5 63 SSW 19 1023.4 Su17 12.7 24.5 0 SSW 33 11:52 20.0 70 15S 1026.6 23.8 51 11S 1024.0 Mo18 12.3 24.7 0 SE 35 10:09 21.3 59 SSE 7 1028.5 22.8 50 SE 15 1026.0 9.5Tu19 25.6 0 ESE 30 12:20 19.6 74 SSW 4 1027.4 24.0 55 13E 1023.6 We20 12.4 21.6 0 SSW 11 12:28 17.4 93 Calm 1023.2 20.4 76 SSW 6 1018.9 Th21 15.2 20.8 0.6 13N 14:23 18.6 95 Calm 1016.3 18.7 96 NNW 2 1011.5 11.2Fr22 19.5 2.6 WNW 26 01:08 15.0 57 SW 4 1014.5 18.5 38 7W 1010.0 Sa23 5.2 16.3 0 NW 17 14:46 9.4 100 Calm 1012.9 15.6 50 NW 7 1009.3 Su24 0.6 21.9 0 24W 14:17 11.5 80 SW 4 1011.3 21.2 42 11W 1008.8 Mo25 4.3 25.3 0 NW 17 14:38 14.1 77 Calm 1016.5 24.8 36 NNW 6 1013.0 3.5Tu26 25.6 0 NW 15 14:25 13.0 78 Calm 1018.8 24.8 27 NW 7 1015.4 We27 8.4 25.3 0 SW 20 11:07 15.3 66 Calm 1021.2 23.5 53 WSW 4 1017.2 12.7Th28 26.8 0 17W 12:23 15.8 94 Calm 1021.5 26.0 49 SSW 6 1017.2 10.7Fr29 24.6 0 SW 30 12:15 20.9 75 SW 13 1022.8 23.9 49 15S 1020.9 Sa30 11.7 25.9 0 SW 26 12:05 19.1 74 SW 11 1025.6 23.3 46 ESE 11 1022.1 Su31 9.1 24.4 0 NE 17 16:48 16.1 89 2S 1023.6 22.9 52 NNW 6 1018.9 Statistics for May 2020 Mean 9.6 24.0 17.5 71 7 1021.5 22.8 47 10 1018.1 Lowest 0.6 16.3 9.4 43 Calm 1011.3 15.6 27 NNW 2 1008.8 Highest 15.2 27.7 2.6 SSE 39 21.3 100 SSW 19 1028.5 27.6 96 20W 1026.0 Total 4.8 Observations were drawn from Beaudesert Drumley Street {station 040983} IDCJDW4141.202005 Prepared at 16:02 UTC on 2 Jul 2020 Copyright © 2020 Bureau of Meteorology Users of this product are deemed to have read the information and accepted the conditions described in the notes at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/dwo/IDCJDW0000.pdf Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix D – Background Noise Measurement Results

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Unattended Noise Measurements District Rural Road Beaudesert‐Nerang Road Address 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Lot and RP numbers Lot 501 on RP808820 LA10 (18 hour) 55.4 dB(A) Owner Pano Pty Ltd LAeq (24 hour) 49.9 dB(A) Start date 25/05/2020 ‐ 11:17:25 LAeq (1 hour) Night 50.8 dB(A) End date 01/06/2020 ‐ 12:27:16 AADT 6,402 LAeq (1 hour) Day 56.0 dB(A) Instrument ARL Ngara C.V 10.47% LA10 (12 hour) 56.8 dB(A) Serial Number 8780D4 Distance 85m LA90 (8 hour) 26.0 dB(A) Pre Calibration 94.0 dB(A) Speed Limit 100 km/h LA90 (18 hour) 39.6 dB(A) Post Calibration 94.0 dB(A) Road Surface Bituminous road surface Sample Interval 60 minutes Microphone Height 1.5 m Predicted 10 year horizon LA10 (18 hour) 57.3 dB(A) Operator Aidan Daniels Façade Corrected? Yes based on a growth rate of 3.54% compounded per annum

Relative Avg Wind Speed Wind Speed max Date Start Time Lmax L1 L10 Leq L90 L99 Lmin Rainfall mm Temp °C Air Pressure hPa Wind Direction Validity Check Humidity m/s m/s 25/05/2020 12:00 66.5 61.2 54.3 51.5 39.3 34.9 32.7 0 22.5 45 1015.1 SSW 4.2 6.7 ✓ 25/05/2020 13:00 65.5 59.4 54.3 50.8 38.1 32.0 30.1 0 23.5 44 1014 SSE 4.2 4.7 ✓ 25/05/2020 14:00 69.4 61.4 55.7 53.1 41.1 34.5 31.9 0 23.7 40 1013.1 SE 3.6 5.3 ✓ 25/05/2020 15:00 69.7 62.3 57.7 54.7 43.9 39.1 36.4 0 24.1 40 1012.8 E 3.1 3.6 ✓ 25/05/2020 16:00 68.6 63.8 59.6 56.1 44.0 34.8 32.6 0 24 35 1012.8 ENE 3.1 4.2 ✓ 25/05/2020 17:00 73.3 63.0 59.5 57.5 47.4 40.1 36.5 0 23.6 36 1012.9 ENE 1.9 3.6 ✓ 25/05/2020 18:00 66.2 61.1 56.9 52.9 39.0 32.1 28.7 0 22.2 39 1013.2 SW 2.5 3.1 ✓ 25/05/2020 19:00 63.7 60.5 54.5 50.1 28.8 25.9 25.0 0 20.6 41 1013.6 ‐ 0.0 0.0 × 25/05/2020 20:00 63.5 59.5 52.7 48.3 25.0 23.6 23.1 0 19 53 1014.5 WNW 2.5 2.5 × 25/05/2020 21:00 65.4 60.1 52.6 48.8 24.5 23.4 23.1 0 18.5 56 1014.9 NW 2.5 3.1 ✓ 25/05/2020 22:00 63.6 58.7 48.7 46.0 22.4 22.0 21.8 0 17.3 64 1015.3 NW 3.6 4.7 ✓ 25/05/2020 23:00 65.6 59.5 49.8 47.2 22.4 21.9 21.8 0 17.5 52 1015.1 WSW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 26/05/2020 0:00 62.8 56.6 43.9 43.0 21.8 21.6 21.5 0 16.2 59 1015 WSW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 26/05/2020 1:00 59.3 52.4 32.7 39.0 21.7 21.5 21.4 0 16.6 53 1014.7 WSW 4.2 6.1 ✓ 26/05/2020 2:00 61.9 56.0 36.3 41.2 21.8 21.5 21.4 0 15.7 56 1014.6 W 4.2 6.1 ✓ 26/05/2020 3:00 58.8 52.1 42.0 40.2 22.6 21.8 21.5 0 14.7 62 1014.5 WSW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 26/05/2020 4:00 65.4 60.1 53.6 49.6 27.5 23.6 22.9 0 14 64 1014.4 WSW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 26/05/2020 5:00 66.3 62.2 57.6 53.7 40.4 32.7 31.3 0 13 69 1014.5 WSW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 26/05/2020 6:00 69.0 64.2 60.2 56.5 46.7 42.8 39.9 0 12.9 72 1014.6 WSW 3.6 4.7 ✓ 26/05/2020 7:00 71.5 64.1 60.1 57.0 48.3 43.5 40.1 0 12.4 75 1015.8 W 3.1 4.2 ✓ 26/05/2020 8:00 66.3 62.1 58.2 54.7 44.8 38.3 35.2 0 13.4 72 1016.4 W 3.1 4.2 ✓ 26/05/2020 9:00 66.1 60.6 55.9 52.4 41.1 35.2 32.8 0 16.9 66 1016.8 WSW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 26/05/2020 10:00 64.4 59.7 55.5 51.9 41.0 34.6 32.3 0 19.4 50 1017 SSW 4.2 5.6 ✓ 26/05/2020 11:00 68.2 59.7 54.7 51.8 38.6 32.2 30.4 0 21.6 41 1017.1 S 4.2 5.6 ✓ 26/05/2020 12:00 62.5 58.9 54.0 50.2 36.7 31.6 29.4 0 22.4 40 1016.7 SSE 3.6 4.2 ✓ 26/05/2020 13:00 67.3 59.9 54.4 51.3 39.7 32.8 29.5 0 22.5 40 1016 SE 2.5 3.1 ✓ 26/05/2020 14:00 62.9 59.3 55.4 51.8 41.4 36.3 33.7 0 22.3 41 1015.1 E 3.6 4.2 ✓ 26/05/2020 15:00 65.5 61.0 57.6 54.1 44.0 38.4 34.6 0 22.1 45 1014.7 E 4.7 5.3 ✓ 26/05/2020 16:00 67.3 63.0 59.6 56.3 46.2 40.0 37.6 0 22 43 1015.1 ENE 5.3 6.1 ✓ 26/05/2020 17:00 69.3 63.7 60.4 57.0 46.6 38.6 36.0 0 22 37 1015.2 ENE 4.2 5.3 ✓ 26/05/2020 18:00 65.3 61.4 57.6 53.3 37.6 28.6 26.7 0 21 52 1015.7 E 4.7 5.3 × 26/05/2020 19:00 66.5 60.7 54.4 50.3 28.5 24.8 24.0 0 20.1 56 1016.1 ENE 3.6 4.7 × 26/05/2020 20:00 64.3 59.8 51.6 48.0 24.5 23.0 22.7 0 19.7 57 1016.9 ENE 3.6 4.2 ✓ 26/05/2020 21:00 62.6 58.0 50.5 46.4 24.7 23.5 23.0 0 18 66 1017.6 NE 3.1 3.6 ✓ 26/05/2020 22:00 64.4 58.4 50.0 46.5 23.3 22.3 22.0 0 16.4 70 1018.1 W 2.5 3.1 ✓ 26/05/2020 23:00 61.7 56.0 45.5 43.8 22.0 21.7 21.6 0 15.6 75 1018.2 WSW 3.1 3.6 ×

Relative Avg Wind Speed Wind Speed max Date Start Time Lmax L1 L10 Leq L90 L99 Lmin Rainfall mm Temp °C Air Pressure hPa Wind Direction Validity Check Humidity m/s m/s 27/05/2020 0:00 65.8 56.8 42.2 44.5 22.0 21.7 21.6 0 15 81 1018.2 W 3.1 3.6 ✓ 27/05/2020 1:00 62.1 54.2 35.9 40.7 22.0 21.8 21.6 0 14.4 82 1017.9 WSW 4.2 4.7 ✓ 27/05/2020 2:00 63.7 58.2 40.3 44.1 21.8 21.6 21.4 0 14.1 84 1017.7 W 3.6 4.2 ✓ 27/05/2020 3:00 59.5 54.1 41.7 41.5 21.9 21.5 21.3 0 13.7 84 1017.2 WSW 3.6 4.2 ✓ 27/05/2020 4:00 60.3 56.5 50.6 46.4 26.6 23.9 22.9 0 13.8 84 1016.8 WSW 4.2 4.7 ✓ 27/05/2020 5:00 63.6 59.7 55.1 51.0 35.5 30.3 29.1 0 13.6 86 1017.1 SW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 27/05/2020 6:00 65.7 62.5 58.0 54.4 43.8 39.3 36.7 0 13.6 86 1017.2 SW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 27/05/2020 7:00 66.4 62.0 57.7 54.3 44.2 40.1 38.2 0 13.2 85 1017.5 SW 2.5 3.6 ✓ 27/05/2020 8:00 70.4 61.6 57.4 54.4 44.3 39.4 37.5 0 14 83 1018.1 SW 3.6 4.7 ✓ 27/05/2020 9:00 65.9 60.7 56.1 52.5 40.6 35.2 31.5 0 16.5 74 1018.8 WSW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 27/05/2020 10:00 65.1 60.3 55.3 51.9 40.0 32.8 30.0 0 19.7 61 1018.8 WSW 2.5 3.6 ✓ 27/05/2020 11:00 64.5 59.6 54.6 51.1 38.6 32.5 29.9 0 22.1 58 1018.5 SSE 3.6 4.2 ✓ 27/05/2020 12:00 64.8 60.2 55.4 51.9 39.9 33.6 30.5 0 23.2 55 1018.3 SSE 2.5 3.1 ✓ 27/05/2020 13:00 64.1 59.3 54.3 51.3 39.7 33.6 31.3 0 22.8 53 1017.2 E 2.5 3.1 ✓ 27/05/2020 14:00 66.0 60.6 56.1 53.0 41.2 34.0 30.9 0 23.8 51 1016.2 ENE 3.6 4.2 ✓ 27/05/2020 15:00 65.3 60.1 56.5 53.1 43.8 37.2 33.6 0 23.7 47 1015.7 E 4.2 4.7 ✓ 27/05/2020 16:00 63.6 60.6 56.7 53.2 42.4 35.8 33.3 0 22.9 50 1015.5 ENE 4.7 5.3 ✓ 27/05/2020 17:00 65.4 61.7 58.3 54.4 42.8 35.9 33.3 0 22.8 48 1015.6 ENE 4.2 4.7 ✓ 27/05/2020 18:00 65.9 62.0 57.8 53.9 43.0 37.8 34.9 0 21.9 52 1015.9 NE 5.3 6.1 ✓ 27/05/2020 19:00 64.2 59.0 54.0 49.5 38.2 33.9 29.5 0 21.2 59 1016.4 NNE 5.3 5.6 × 27/05/2020 20:00 64.2 59.0 51.5 48.0 37.8 32.6 28.5 0 20.4 66 1017 N 3.1 3.6 ✓ 27/05/2020 21:00 61.4 56.8 48.9 45.6 35.0 28.9 26.2 0 18.8 68 1017.4 NW 2.5 3.1 ✓ 27/05/2020 22:00 60.5 57.0 49.2 45.7 34.8 27.7 25.1 0 18.3 70 1017.6 NW 3.1 3.6 ✓ 27/05/2020 23:00 61.5 56.5 45.6 43.9 28.5 25.0 23.9 0 17.7 71 1017.5 WNW 3.1 3.6 × 28/05/2020 0:00 58.6 53.6 37.3 39.5 23.9 23.2 22.8 0 17 73 1017.3 WNW 3.6 4.2 ✓ 28/05/2020 1:00 53.5 47.9 36.9 37.3 23.3 22.9 22.6 0 16.7 78 1017 NW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 28/05/2020 2:00 55.7 49.2 36.1 37.3 23.3 22.9 22.7 0 17.1 79 1016.8 NW 3.1 3.6 ✓ 28/05/2020 3:00 62.3 56.0 44.3 43.4 23.1 22.8 22.5 0 16.9 80 1016.5 NW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 28/05/2020 4:00 60.0 56.7 50.3 46.3 26.2 23.4 23.0 0 16.3 81 1016.2 WNW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 28/05/2020 5:00 64.1 59.8 55.4 51.2 34.2 29.6 27.9 0 15.8 84 1016.3 WNW 2.5 3.1 ✓ 28/05/2020 6:00 66.1 62.2 58.4 54.7 43.0 38.1 36.0 0 15.6 84 1016.7 WNW 3.6 4.2 ✓ 28/05/2020 7:00 66.0 61.8 58.0 54.6 45.8 42.0 38.5 0 16.1 82 1017.3 W 3.6 4.7 ✓ 28/05/2020 8:00 70.4 65.1 58.6 55.9 43.7 37.6 34.9 0 16.4 82 1017.3 WNW 2.5 3.6 ✓ 28/05/2020 9:00 66.7 62.3 56.7 53.6 41.9 35.7 32.1 0 19.3 74 1017.4 NW 1.7 2.5 ✓ 28/05/2020 10:00 71.7 62.1 56.6 53.9 40.9 35.5 32.5 0 21 68 1017.7 NW 2.5 3.1 ✓ 28/05/2020 11:00 63.7 60.5 54.8 51.4 39.1 33.1 29.9 0 21.8 65 1017.6 NNE 4.2 4.7 ✓ 28/05/2020 12:00 63.0 58.6 54.3 50.7 39.0 33.5 30.0 0 24.5 54 1016.9 N 3.6 5.3 ✓ 28/05/2020 13:00 64.5 58.4 54.2 50.8 39.1 33.8 31.6 0 26.1 43 1016 W 3.6 6.1 ✓ 28/05/2020 14:00 69.2 60.8 55.6 52.4 40.7 35.5 32.6 0 25.4 47 1015.1 WNW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 28/05/2020 15:00 69.8 61.6 57.6 54.5 45.2 39.4 36.5 0 27 41 1014.5 SE 3.6 4.7 ✓ 28/05/2020 16:00 66.1 63.2 59.5 56.0 46.6 41.6 39.8 0 25.7 44 1014.2 E 4.2 4.7 ✓ 28/05/2020 17:00 68.5 62.8 59.1 55.7 46.5 40.0 37.0 0 24 57 1014.4 ENE 4.7 5.6 ✓ 28/05/2020 18:00 66.6 61.7 57.0 53.1 41.9 35.0 33.4 0 23 66 1015 NE 5.3 6.1 ✓ 28/05/2020 19:00 67.5 60.9 55.0 51.1 36.6 32.5 30.2 0 22.2 71 1015.7 NNE 4.7 5.3 ✓ 28/05/2020 20:00 66.4 61.9 54.7 51.3 43.5 35.3 29.5 0 21.7 75 1016.2 N 3.1 4.2 ✓ 28/05/2020 21:00 64.6 58.9 51.1 48.6 40.6 34.1 28.8 0 20.9 77 1016.7 N 3.6 5.3 ✓ 28/05/2020 22:00 62.1 57.7 51.8 48.9 43.3 36.4 29.3 0 19.9 77 1017.2 NW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 28/05/2020 23:00 61.0 55.2 48.1 46.1 32.7 26.3 24.2 0 18.6 79 1017.4 NNW 4.2 5.6 ✓

Relative Avg Wind Speed Wind Speed max Date Start Time Lmax L1 L10 Leq L90 L99 Lmin Rainfall mm Temp °C Air Pressure hPa Wind Direction Validity Check Humidity m/s m/s 29/05/2020 0:00 55.0 48.9 36.1 36.3 24.0 23.5 23.2 0 16.2 81 1017.3 W 2.5 3.1 ✓ 29/05/2020 1:00 51.7 44.4 33.7 33.4 23.6 23.2 22.9 0 15.6 78 1017.3 WSW 3.6 4.7 ✓ 29/05/2020 2:00 61.6 56.1 41.5 42.1 22.9 22.6 22.4 0 14.8 77 1017.3 SW 2.5 3.6 ✓ 29/05/2020 3:00 59.2 54.9 43.6 41.9 23.2 22.8 22.7 0 15.4 66 1017.3 W 2.5 3.1 ✓ 29/05/2020 4:00 62.6 58.4 50.7 47.0 25.3 23.6 23.2 0 14.1 80 1017.4 NW 1.7 1.9 ✓ 29/05/2020 5:00 67.7 61.3 56.6 52.6 36.4 29.9 27.9 0 13.4 81 1017.6 ‐ 0.0 0.0 ✓ 29/05/2020 6:00 69.6 63.6 60.0 56.3 46.1 41.0 37.3 0 12.8 78 1017.6 WSW 2.5 3.1 ✓ 29/05/2020 7:00 72.6 64.4 59.9 56.6 47.5 43.1 40.7 0 12.1 83 1018.3 WSW 3.6 4.7 ✓ 29/05/2020 8:00 65.4 61.6 57.7 54.4 44.5 40.4 37.6 0 13.3 76 1018.9 NW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 29/05/2020 9:00 64.3 60.7 55.5 52.3 41.4 35.4 32.4 0 18.1 62 1019.7 ‐ 0.0 0.0 ✓ 29/05/2020 10:00 63.9 59.7 56.0 52.2 40.8 35.5 33.3 0 19.5 58 1020.3 ENE 1.1 1.9 ✓ 29/05/2020 11:00 66.2 61.4 55.3 52.2 41.0 35.7 33.1 0 22.2 42 1020 SW 3.1 4.2 ✓ 29/05/2020 12:00 64.1 59.5 55.3 51.8 42.2 37.5 36.0 0 24.1 35 1019.1 S 3.1 3.6 ✓ 29/05/2020 13:00 66.6 60.0 55.4 52.0 41.5 36.8 34.8 0 25.1 37 1018.2 S 3.1 3.6 ✓ 29/05/2020 14:00 66.1 61.3 56.4 53.3 42.4 39.4 38.0 0 24.6 40 1017.4 ESE 3.1 3.6 ✓ 29/05/2020 15:00 66.3 59.6 56.0 52.8 44.0 39.6 37.2 0 24 43 1016.9 E 3.1 3.6 ✓ 29/05/2020 16:00 69.3 61.1 56.4 53.6 43.8 37.3 35.2 0 24 42 1016.7 E 2.5 3.1 ✓ 29/05/2020 17:00 68.9 61.8 57.0 54.3 46.7 42.4 36.5 0 22.6 56 1016.6 NE 4.2 4.7 ✓ 29/05/2020 18:00 67.6 63.3 59.1 55.4 47.9 44.9 39.8 0 21.8 60 1016.9 NE 4.2 4.7 ✓ 29/05/2020 19:00 67.5 62.8 57.5 53.6 40.9 31.0 27.1 0 21.6 64 1017.4 NE 4.7 5.3 ✓ 29/05/2020 20:00 65.3 60.4 54.5 50.2 26.6 25.3 24.9 0 21.4 66 1018.3 NNE 3.6 4.2 × 29/05/2020 21:00 66.7 60.8 55.0 50.3 25.0 24.2 23.8 0 19.7 70 1018.8 NW 1.9 3.1× 29/05/2020 22:00 63.8 59.5 52.9 48.4 24.3 23.5 23.1 0 18.9 75 1019 NW 1.9 2.5 × 29/05/2020 23:00 64.9 59.8 48.4 46.6 24.4 23.6 23.2 0 18.3 77 1018.9 NW 3.1 3.6× 30/05/2020 0:00 64.3 58.6 46.1 45.2 23.2 22.8 22.6 0 18 72 1018.9 WNW 2.5 3.1 ✓ 30/05/2020 1:00 61.6 55.9 40.2 42.1 23.7 23.2 22.9 0 16.8 79 1018.4 W 2.5 2.5 ✓ 30/05/2020 2:00 64.1 57.9 42.9 44.4 23.4 22.9 22.6 0 16.1 81 1018.2 W 2.5 3.1 ✓ 30/05/2020 3:00 56.0 45.2 29.3 33.7 23.5 23.0 22.8 0 15.8 84 1018 W 2.5 3.1 ✓ 30/05/2020 4:00 64.3 57.8 43.9 45.5 25.4 24.6 24.2 0 16.1 83 1017.9 W 1.9 2.5 ✓ 30/05/2020 5:00 61.7 56.8 51.1 46.6 27.2 25.4 24.9 0 16 85 1017.9 ‐ 0.0 0.0 ✓ 30/05/2020 6:00 67.8 61.5 56.5 52.9 39.9 34.6 30.8 0 16.3 84 1017.8 WSW 1.7 1.9 ✓ 30/05/2020 7:00 78.7 69.0 59.7 58.3 42.9 37.1 33.3 0 16.5 84 1018.2 WSW 3.1 3.6× 30/05/2020 8:00 72.0 64.0 57.6 54.5 41.3 35.5 30.9 0 16.9 85 1018.7 SW 1.9 1.9 ✓ 30/05/2020 9:00 69.2 62.3 56.1 53.2 41.4 37.1 33.4 0 18.3 80 1019.3 SW 1.9 2.5 ✓ 30/05/2020 10:00 64.5 61.0 56.0 52.8 43.0 37.4 34.8 0 20.3 72 1019.5 S 2.5 3.1 ✓ 30/05/2020 11:00 67.3 62.1 57.2 54.2 45.4 40.5 38.6 0 23 65 1019.1 SE 2.5 3.1 ✓ 30/05/2020 12:00 68.3 62.6 57.0 54.2 45.4 40.2 38.4 0 22.7 62 1018.3 SE 1.7 1.9 ✓ 30/05/2020 13:00 68.4 60.5 55.4 52.6 43.0 37.8 36.1 0 24.4 63 1016.9 ENE 2.5 3.1 ✓ 30/05/2020 14:00 65.5 61.5 56.5 53.3 43.4 36.6 33.8 0 24.5 60 1015.8 ENE 3.6 4.2 ✓ 30/05/2020 15:00 67.3 61.3 57.1 53.8 44.6 38.5 35.4 0 24.3 70 1015 E 2.5 3.1 ✓ 30/05/2020 16:00 65.6 62.0 58.5 54.9 44.4 35.6 33.0 0 24.6 67 1014.8 NNE 7.8 8.6 ✓ 30/05/2020 17:00 67.7 62.8 58.0 54.6 46.5 41.0 36.6 0 24.7 70 1014.8 NE 5.6 7.2 ✓ 30/05/2020 18:00 65.6 61.7 57.7 54.2 48.0 44.5 39.6 0 23.3 78 1014.7 NNE 7.2 8.3 ✓ 30/05/2020 19:00 65.3 60.1 55.1 51.8 46.6 41.1 36.3 0 23 83 1015.2 N 6.7 7.8 ✓ 30/05/2020 20:00 60.6 57.7 53.0 49.7 40.6 32.6 27.8 0 22.9 85 1015.5 N 7.2 8.3 ✓ 30/05/2020 21:00 63.2 58.8 52.0 47.8 27.1 24.6 23.9 0 22.1 84 1016.7 W 5.6 8.3 × 30/05/2020 22:00 62.1 57.8 51.6 47.0 25.0 23.9 23.5 0.2 18.4 79 1016.9 WSW 3.14.7 × 30/05/2020 23:00 60.2 55.0 47.2 43.6 23.6 23.0 22.8 0.2 19.2 61 1017.6 W 3.1 4.2 ✓

Relative Avg Wind Speed Wind Speed max Date Start Time Lmax L1 L10 Leq L90 L99 Lmin Rainfall mm Temp °C Air Pressure hPa Wind Direction Validity Check Humidity m/s m/s 31/05/2020 0:00 63.4 57.6 48.0 45.3 23.2 22.6 22.4 0.2 18.1 57 1017.8 WSW 5.3 8.3 ✓ 31/05/2020 1:00 61.3 55.1 40.7 41.6 22.3 22.0 21.8 0.2 18.2 46 1017.6 WSW 6.1 9.2 ✓ 31/05/2020 2:00 57.2 46.5 32.3 35.2 21.9 21.7 21.5 0.2 18.1 36 1017.7 WSW 8.6 13.9 ✓ 31/05/2020 3:00 56.8 51.8 37.0 37.9 22.2 21.9 21.6 0.2 16.7 39 1018.2 WSW 7.8 11.9 ✓ 31/05/2020 4:00 57.2 53.1 43.4 40.7 22.6 22.2 21.9 0.2 15.9 39 1018 WSW 7.2 10.8 ✓ 31/05/2020 5:00 57.8 54.9 44.6 42.3 24.0 23.1 22.7 0.2 15.4 40 1018.4 WSW 5.3 7.2 ✓ 31/05/2020 6:00 63.3 58.4 54.1 49.7 38.6 35.3 31.8 0.2 14.8 39 1019.1 SW 4.7 7.8 × 31/05/2020 7:00 72.6 65.5 58.9 55.4 41.9 37.2 32.7 0.2 13.1 47 1019.8 W 4.7 7.2 ✓ 31/05/2020 8:00 69.4 64.4 57.7 54.8 41.8 36.0 32.8 0.2 13.4 45 1020.5 W 4.2 5.3 ✓ 31/05/2020 9:00 64.0 59.8 55.3 51.8 41.3 36.1 33.5 0.2 14.9 43 1021.2 WSW 5.3 9.2 ✓ 31/05/2020 10:00 67.2 61.6 56.0 52.9 42.2 37.0 33.4 0.2 15.7 39 1020.9 W 5.6 9.7 ✓ 31/05/2020 11:00 67.9 61.1 56.3 53.5 44.0 38.7 35.5 0 18 34 1020.5 SW 5.6 8.3 ✓ 31/05/2020 12:00 67.5 63.4 56.5 53.7 42.8 35.6 31.6 0 18.5 30 1020.1 WSW 7.2 9.7 ✓ 31/05/2020 13:00 68.9 62.8 56.1 53.3 42.3 37.5 35.3 0 19.8 29 1019.4 WSW 6.1 9.7 ✓ 31/05/2020 14:00 73.4 63.5 56.8 55.3 43.8 37.2 34.4 0 21.3 26 1019.1 WSW 6.7 9.7 × 31/05/2020 15:00 66.0 62.0 57.6 54.4 45.0 40.4 37.4 0 22.2 28 1018.6 WSW 6.7 9.2 ✓ 31/05/2020 16:00 70.4 61.8 57.8 54.6 44.7 40.2 37.9 0 21.7 28 1018.3 WSW 6.7 8.6 ✓ 31/05/2020 17:00 63.5 60.7 57.4 54.0 46.0 40.5 37.0 0 21.6 28 1018.6 W 5.3 8.3 ✓ 31/05/2020 18:00 65.8 62.0 57.8 54.1 47.4 43.8 37.2 0 19.7 31 1019.5 WSW 4.7 8.3 ✓ 31/05/2020 19:00 64.6 60.1 54.9 51.2 44.0 37.3 32.8 0 18.5 33 1020.5 W 3.1 4.7 ✓ 31/05/2020 20:00 63.7 57.3 51.3 48.5 33.2 27.7 25.7 0 17.6 36 1021.5 W 3.6 5.6 ✓ 31/05/2020 21:00 62.8 58.0 47.3 45.1 24.7 23.9 23.5 0 16.8 40 1022 WSW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 31/05/2020 22:00 61.1 56.9 47.9 44.9 24.1 23.4 23.0 0 15.9 44 1022.3 WSW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 31/05/2020 23:00 59.6 53.9 40.6 40.7 22.8 22.4 22.2 0 14.9 48 1022.3 WSW 4.7 6.1 × 1/06/2020 0:00 57.3 49.8 31.3 36.1 22.2 22.0 21.8 0 13.7 53 1022.7 WSW 4.7 6.7 ✓ 1/06/2020 1:00 54.5 45.9 34.5 34.6 22.4 22.1 21.9 0 13.5 53 1022.7 WSW 4.2 6.7 ✓ 1/06/2020 2:00 60.5 55.7 37.7 41.6 22.4 22.1 21.9 0 12.8 57 1022.2 WSW 4.7 6.7 ✓ 1/06/2020 3:00 62.0 56.8 45.4 43.7 22.7 22.2 21.9 0 12.6 59 1022.1 WSW 4.7 5.6 ✓ 1/06/2020 4:00 65.6 58.8 52.6 48.3 28.2 24.9 24.0 0 12.3 63 1021.8 WSW 4.2 5.6 ✓ 1/06/2020 5:00 65.1 61.8 57.1 53.0 38.3 33.2 31.3 0 12.2 63 1021.6 SW 4.7 5.6 ✓ 1/06/2020 6:00 70.3 63.2 59.3 55.9 45.9 40.9 38.5 0 12.2 60 1021.7 SW 3.6 5.3 ✓ 1/06/2020 7:00 68.0 62.9 58.9 55.5 47.4 43.7 39.9 0 12 62 1022.6 SW 3.6 5.6 ✓ 1/06/2020 8:00 65.9 60.8 57.5 54.2 44.0 37.7 34.2 0 13.3 58 1023.4 SW 4.2 5.6 ✓ 1/06/2020 9:00 66.8 61.8 56.7 53.3 41.3 35.0 31.1 0 15.3 53 1024.1 WSW 4.7 7.2 ✓ 1/06/2020 10:00 65.1 60.4 56.0 52.5 41.3 36.1 32.8 0 18 53 1024.4 SW 4.2 6.7 ✓ 1/06/2020 11:00 68.2 61.0 55.7 52.4 39.8 34.1 31.0 0 19.8 49 1024.5 SSW 4.7 7.2 ✓

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Unattended Noise Measurements 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Environmental Noise Levels Day, Evening and Night

LAeq,T LA01,T LA10,T LA90,T Logger Location - North façade of dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) existing house Date Day D E N D E N D E N D E N ARL Environmental Noise Logger 25/05/2020 Monday — 50 46 — 60 58 — 54 47 — 29 27 Logger Serial Number 8780D4 26/05/2020 Tuesday 53 50 46 61 60 57 57 54 47 43 29 27 Measurement Title 20200525_111724 27/05/2020 Wednesday 53 49 44 61 59 55 56 53 46 42 38 29 Measurement started at 25/05/2020 - 11:17:25 28/05/2020 Thursday 54 51 45 62 61 56 57 54 47 43 41 31 Measurement stopped at 01/06/2020 - 12:27:16 29/05/2020 Friday 53 52 45 61 62 57 56 57 46 43 35 26 Frequency Weighting A 30/05/2020 Saturday 54 51 43 63 60 54 57 54 44 44 41 25 Time Averaging Fast 31/05/2020 Sunday 54 50 44 62 59 56 57 53 45 43 37 28 Statistical Interval 15 min Average 54 50 45 62 60 56 57 54 46 43 36 27 Pre-measurement Ref. 94.0 Post-measurement Ref. 94.0 Engineering Units dB SPL

Note

― No noise data available

Day (D): 7:00am to 6:00pm

Evening (E): 6:00pm to 10:00pm

Night (N): 10:00pm to 7:00am

██ Rainfall recorded on this day

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Unattended Noise Measurements 25 May to 1 June 2020

60 Lmax 55 L1 50 L10 Leq 45 L90

SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 40

20 25/05 26/05 27/05 28/05 29/05 30/05 31/05 01/06 02/06 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Time

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Unattended Noise Measurements Monday 25 May 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Tuesday 26 May 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Wednesday 27 May 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Unattended Noise Measurements Thursday 28 May 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Friday 29 May 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Saturday 30 May 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Unattended Noise Measurements Sunday 31 May 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Monday 1 June 2020

90 85 80 75 70 65 Lmax 60 55 L1 50 45 L10 40 Leq 35 30 L90 25 Sound Pressure SoundPressure LeveldB(A) 20 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 Time

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix E – AADT Segment Report

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Cedar Vale

Mt Lindesay Hwy Woodhill

Mt Lindesay Hwy

Veresdale

Mt Lindesay Hwy

Gleneagle

Birnam

Traffic Analysis and Reporting System AADT Segment Report TARS Area 410 - South Coast District Road Section 202 - BEAUDESERT - NERANG ROAD 14-Jun-2019 10:51 Road Segment from 0.000km to 7.640km Segment Site 11427 Traffic Year 2018 Data Collection Year 2018 Page 1 of 2 (1 of 7)

-27.954045

Mt Lindesay Hwy

Beaudesert Beenleigh Rd

Goomeri Gympie

Manumbar Beaudesert Beenleigh Rd Belli Park Nanango Jimna Beaudesert Rural Beaudesert Nerang Rd Caloundra

Blackbutt Brisbane St Kilcoy

Beaudesert Boonah Rd Beachmere

Crows Nest Dundas Brisbane St Brisbane Gatton Marburg Beaudesert Nerang Rd Beaudesert Boonah Rd Sandy Creek Rd Beenleigh Greenmount East

Merryvale 152.989532 153.066254 Sandy Creek Rd Beaudesert Town Beaudesert Town Allora 11427 Sandy Creek Rd Maroon Warwick Binna Burra William St

Bromelton St Beaudesert Nerang Rd Braeside Brisbane St

Beaudesert Nerang Rd Beaudesert Boonah Rd Albert St Stanthorpe Purga Greenbank Beaudesert Nerang Rd East Ripley Bahrs Scrub Brisbane St North Maclean LuscombeTelemon St

Flinders Kerry Rd Jimboomba Town Ilbogan Cedar Creek Kerry Rd Milbong Veresdale Wyaralong Teviotville Boyland Kerry Rd Beaudesert Town Boonah Canungra Town Kerry Rd Josephville Bunburra Kooralbyn Town Kerry Knapp Creek Beechmont Kerry Rd

Kerry Rd Maroon Christmas Creek Binna Burra Kerry Rd Copyright The State of Queensland 2009. Barney View Lamington Copyright Pitney Bowes Softare Pty Ltd 2009 Based on [Dataset - State Digital Road Network (SDRN)] provided Mt Lindesay Hwy

with the permission of Pitney Bowes Softare Pty Ltd (current as of 12/08) and other state government datasets.Kerry Rd -28.014421 Tylerville Chinghee Creek

Kerry Rd Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Cryna

Kerry Rd

Nindooinbah House Rd

Mt Lindesay Hwy

Mt Lindesay Hwy Kerry Rd

Nindooinbah Connection Rd Traffic Analysis and Reporting System AADT Segment Report TARS Area 410 - South Coast District Road Section 202 - BEAUDESERT - NERANG ROAD 14-Jun-2019 10:51 Road Segment from 0.000km to 7.640km Segment Site 11427 Traffic Year 2018 Data Collection Year 2018 Page 2 of 2 (2 of 7)

Site 11427. Point 210003723. 220m east of Brooklands Drive east. 4.00 km The width of each Road Segment is proportional to its AADT.

0.00 km 7.64 km Start Point 210003004. Mount End Point 210003005. Beaudesert- Lindesay Highway Intersection. Beenleigh Road Intersection.

This report shows Annual Average Daily Traffic values (AADTs). Because the AADT values are All Vehicles (00) converted to whole numbers, there will be occasional inaccuracies due to rounding. G 3,203 100% These inaccuracies are statistically insignificant. A 3,150 100% B 6,353 100%

Light Vehicles (0A) Heavy Vehicles (0B)

G 2,903 90.63% G 302 9.43% A 2,788 88.51% A 363 11.52% B 5,691 89.58% B 665 10.47%

Short Vehicles (1A) Trucks and Buses (1B) Articulated Vehicles (1C) Road Trains (1D)

G 2,903 90.63% G 213 6.65% G 64 2.00% G 25 0.78% A 2,788 88.51% A 272 8.63% A 69 2.19% A 22 0.70% B 5,691 89.58% B 485 7.63% B 133 2.09% B 47 0.74%

Short 2-Axle Short Vehicles 2-Axle Trucks 3-Axle Trucks 4-Axle 3-Axle 4-Axle 5-Axle 6-Axle Double Road Triple Road Vehicles (2A) Towing (2B) and Buses (2C) and Buses (2D) Trucks (2E) Articulated (2F) Articulated (2G) Articulated (2H) Articulated (2I) B Double (2J) Trains (2K) Trains (2L) G 2,777 86.70% G 126 3.93% G 163 5.09% G 39 1.22% G 11 0.34% G 7 0.22% G 12 0.37% G 9 0.28% G 36 1.12% G 25 0.78% G 0 0% G 0 0% A 2,671 84.79% A 117 3.71% A 223 7.08% A 39 1.24% A 10 0.32% A 9 0.29% A 16 0.51% A 7 0.22% A 37 1.17% A 22 0.70% A 0 0% A 0 0% B 5,448 85.75% B 243 3.82% B 386 6.08% B 78 1.23% B 21 0.33% B 16 0.25% B 28 0.44% B 16 0.25% B 73 1.15% B 47 0.74% B 0 0% B 0 0%

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Traffic Analysis and Reporting System TARS Report Notes for AADT Segment Report 14-Jun-2019 10:51 Page 1 of 1 (3 of 7)

AADT Segment Annual Volume Report Site Provides summary data for the selected AADT Segment of a The physical location of a traffic counting device. Sites are Road Section. Summary data is presented as both located at a specified Through Distance along a Road Section. directional information and a combined bi-directional figure. The data is then broken down by Traffic Class, when Site Description available. The report also includes maps displaying the The description of the physical location of the traffic counting device. location of both the AADT Segment and the traffic count site. Start and End Point Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) The unique identifier for the Through Distance along a Road Section. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is the number of vehicles passing a point on a road in a 24 hour period, averaged over a calendar year. Vehicle Class Traffic is categorised as per the Austroads Vehicle Classification AADT Segments scheme. Traffic classes are in the following hierarchical format: The State declared road network is broken into Road Sections Volume or All Vehicles and then further broken down into AADT Segments. An AADT 00 = 0A + 0B Segment is a sub-section of the declared road network where traffic volume is similar along the entire AADT Segment. Light Vehicles 0A = 1A Area 1A = 2A + 2B For administration purposes the Department of Transport and Heavy Vehicles Main Roads has divided Queensland into 12 Districts. The Area 0B = 1B + 1C + 1D field in TSDM reports displays the District Name and Number. 1B = 2C + 2D + 2E 1C = 2F + 2G + 2H + 2I District Name District 1D = 2J + 2K + 2L Central West District 401 Darling Downs District 402 The following classes are the categories Far North District 403 for which data can be captured: Fitzroy District 404 Volume Mackay/Whitsunday District 405 Metropolitian District 406 00 All vehicles North Coast District 407 2-Bin North West District 409 0A Light vehicles Northern District 408 0B Heavy vehicles South Coast District 410 South West District 411 4-Bin Wide Bay/Burnett District 412 1A Short vehicles 1B Truck or bus 1C Articulated vehicles AADT Values 1D Road train AADT values are displayed by direction of travel as: 12-Bin G Traffic flow in gazettal direction A Traffic flow against gazettal direction 2A Short 2 axle vehicles B Traffic flow in both directions 2B Short vehicles towing 2C 2 axle truck or bus 2D 3 axle truck or bus Data Collection Year 2E 4 axle truck Is the most recent year that data was 2F 3 axle articulated vehicle collected at the data collection site. 2G 4 axle articulated vehicle 2H 5 axle articulated vehicle Please Note: 2I 6 axle articulated vehicle Due to location and/or departmental policy, 2J B double some sites are not counted every year. 2K Double road train 2L Triple road train

Gazettal Direction Copyright Is the direction of the traffic flow. It can be easily recognised by Copyright The State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) 2013 referring to the name of the road eg. Road Section: 10A Brisbane - Licence Gympie denotes that the gazettal direction is from Brisbane to Gympie. http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nd/3.0/au This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY-ND) Licence. To attribute this material, cite State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) 2013 Maps Display the selected location from a range of viewing levels, the start and end position details for the AADT Segment and the location of the traffic count site.

Road Section Is the Gazetted road from which the traffic data is collected. Each Road Section is given a code, allocated sequentially in Gazettal Direction. Larger roads are broken down into sections and identified by an ID code with a suffix for easier data collection and reporting (eg. 10A, 10B, 10C). Road Sections are then broken into AADT Segments which are determined by traffic volume.

Segment Site Is the unique identifier for the traffic count site representing the traffic flow within the AADT Segment.

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Traffic Analysis and Reporting System Annual Volume Report TARS Area 410 - South Coast District Road Section 202 - BEAUDESERT - NERANG ROAD 14-Jun-2019 10:51 Site 11427 - 220m east of Brooklands Dve east TDist 4.000km Speed Limit 100 Page 1 of 3 (4 of 7)

-27.983702

Virginia Coominya Amity Point Brisbane Glamorgan Vale Birkdale Dunwich

Birru Acacia Ridge Ipswich Garden Island Beaudesert Nerang Rd Hidden Vale Purga Greenbank Alberton

Coleyville Flinders Cedar Creek 11427 Currigee Coulson Aratula Beaudesert Town Ashmore Beaudesert Nerang Rd Clumber Cannon Creek 153.028809 153.045410 Beechmont Palm BeachBeaudesert Nerang Rd

Hillview Barney View Tomewin

Summerfield Dr

Local Rd

Beaudesert Rural

Copyright The State of Queensland 2009. Copyright Pitney Bowes Softare Pty Ltd 2009 Based on [Dataset - State Digital Road Network (SDRN)] provided with the permission of Pitney Bowes Softare Pty Ltd (current as of 12/08) and other state government datasets. -27.996767

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Traffic Analysis and Reporting System TARS Annual Volume Report 14-Jun-2019 10:51 Page 2 of 3 (5 of 7)

Area 410 - South Coast District Year 2018 Growth last Year 3.62% Road Section 202 - BEAUDESERT - NERANG ROAD Site 11427 - 220m east of Brooklands Dve east AADT 6,353 Growth last 5 Yrs 3.76% Thru Dist 4.0 Avg Week Day 6,924 Growth last 10 Yrs 3.54% Type C - Coverage Avg Weekend Day 5,844 Stream TB - Bi-directional traffic flow

AADT History 7,000 7,000 6,500 6,500 6,000 6,000 5,500 5,500 5,000 5,000 4,500 4,500 4,000 4,000 3,500 3,500

AADT 3,000 3,000 AADT 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,000 1,000 500 500 0 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

1-Year 5-Year 10-Year 1-Year 5-Year 10-Year Year AADT Growth Growth Growth Year AADT Growth Growth Growth 2018 6,353 3.62% 3.76% 3.54% 2003 3,444 3.61% 2017 6,131 -7.29% 4.01% 3.51% 2002 3,324 2016 6,613 19.93% 7.26% 5.40% 2001 2015 5,514 0.49% 2.61% 3.36% 2000 2014 5,487 6.79% 2.90% 3.93% 1999 2013 5,138 2.03% 2.36% 3.65% 1998 2012 5,036 1.86% 2.65% 4.04% 1997 2011 4,944 0.35% 4.01% 1996 2010 4,927 1.07% 5.52% 1995 2009 4,875 12.40% 6.58% 1994 2008 4,337 -1.27% 4.62% 1993 2007 4,393 14.43% 6.30% 1992 2006 3,839 1.97% 1991 2005 3,765 2.84% 1990 2004 3,661 6.30% 1989

Hourly Averages 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0

9.0 9.0

8.0 8.0

7.0 7.0

6.0 6.0

5.0 5.0 % AADT % AADT 4.0 4.0

3.0 3.0

2.0 2.0

1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 01-02 03-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 21-22 23-00 01-02 03-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 21-22 23-00 01-02 03-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 21-22 23-00 01-02 03-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 21-22 23-00 01-02 03-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 21-22 23-00 01-02 03-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 21-22 23-00 01-02 03-04 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 21-22 23-00 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Hours of the Week

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Traffic Analysis and Reporting System TARS Annual Volume Report 14-Jun-2019 10:51 Page 3 of 3 (6 of 7)

Daily Averages 130 130 125 125

120 120

115 115

110 110

% AADT 105 105 % AADT

100 100

95 95 90 90 Fri Sat Tue Thu Sun Mon Wed Days of the Week

Weekly Averages 108.0 108.0

107.0 107.0

106.0 106.0

105.0 105.0 % AADT % AADT

104.0 104.0

103.0 103.0

102.0 102.0 05-Jul - 11-Jul 12-Jul - 18-Jul 19-Jul - 25-Jul 28-Jun - 04-Jul 26-Jul - 01-Aug 05-Apr - 11-Apr 12-Apr - 18-Apr 19-Apr - 25-Apr 04-Oct - 10-Oct 11-Oct - 17-Oct 18-Oct - 24-Oct 25-Oct - 31-Oct 04-Jan - 10-Jan 11-Jan - 17-Jan 18-Jan - 24-Jan 25-Jan - 31-Jan 07-Jun - 13-Jun 14-Jun - 20-Jun 21-Jun - 27-Jun 29-Mar - 04-Apr 27-Sep - 03-Oct 28-Dec - 03-Jan 27-Dec - 02-Jan 01-Mar - 07-Mar 08-Mar - 14-Mar 15-Mar - 21-Mar 22-Mar - 28-Mar 26-Apr - 02-May 01-Feb - 07-Feb 08-Feb - 14-Feb 15-Feb - 21-Feb 22-Feb - 28-Feb 31-May - 06-Jun 01-Nov - 07-Nov 08-Nov - 14-Nov 15-Nov - 21-Nov 22-Nov - 28-Nov 29-Nov - 05-Dec 06-Dec - 12-Dec 13-Dec - 19-Dec 20-Dec - 26-Dec 02-Aug - 08-Aug 09-Aug - 15-Aug 16-Aug - 22-Aug 23-Aug - 29-Aug 30-Aug - 05-Sep 06-Sep - 12-Sep 13-Sep - 19-Sep 20-Sep - 26-Sep 03-May - 09-May 10-May - 16-May 17-May - 23-May 24-May - 30-May

2018 Calendar January February March April M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 30 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 29 30 31 26 27 28 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

May June July August M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 30 31 1 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 31

September October November December M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Days on which traffic data was collected.

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Traffic Analysis and Reporting System TARS Report Notes for Annual Volume Report 14-Jun-2019 10:51 Page 1 of 1 (7 of 7)

Annual Volume Report Growth Percentage Displays AADT history with hourly, daily and weekly Represents the increase or decrease in AADT, using a patterns by Stream in addition to annual data for AADT exponential fit over the previous 1, 5 or 10 year period. figures with 1 year, 5 year and 10 year growth rates. Hour, Day & Week Averages Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) The amount of traffic on the road network will vary depending Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is the number of vehicles passing on the time of day, the day of the week and the week of the a point on a road in a 24 hour period, averaged over a calendar year. year. The ebb and flow of traffic travelling through a site over a period of time forms a pattern. The Hour, Day and Week AADT History Averages are then used in the calculation of AADT. Displays the years when traffic data was collected at this count site. Road Section Area Is the Gazetted road from which the traffic data is collected. Each For administration purposes the Department of Transport and Road Section is given a code, allocated sequentially in Gazettal Main Roads has divided Queensland into 12 Districts. The Area Direction. Larger roads are broken down into sections and field in TSDM reports displays the District Name and Number. identified by an ID code with a suffix for easier data collection and District Name District reporting (eg. 10A, 10B, 10C). Road Sections are then broken into AADT Segments which are determined by traffic volume. Central West District 401 Darling Downs District 402 Far North District 403 Site Fitzroy District 404 The unique identifier and description of the physical Mackay/Whitsunday District 405 location of a traffic counting device. Sites are Metropolitian District 406 located at a Through Distance along a Road Section. North Coast District 407 North West District 409 Northern District 408 Stream South Coast District 410 The lane in which the traffic is travelling in. This report South West District 411 provides data for the combined flow of traffic in both directions. Wide Bay/Burnett District 412 Thru Dist or TDist Avg Week Day The distance from the beginning of the Road Section, in kilometres. Average daily traffic volume during the week days, Monday to Friday. Type Avg Weekend Day There are two types of traffic counting sites, Permanent Average daily traffic volume during and Coverage. Permanent means the traffic counting the weekend, Saturday and Sunday. device is in place 24/7. Coverage means the traffic counting device is in place for a specified period of time. Calendar Days on which traffic data was collected are highlighted in green. Year Is the current year for the report. Where an AADT Year record Gazettal Direction is missing a traffic count has not been conducted, for that year. The Gazettal Direction is the direction of the traffic flow. Copyright It can be easily recognised by referring to the name of the Copyright The State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) 2013 road eg. Road Section: 10A Brisbane - Gympie denotes Licence that the gazettal direction is from Brisbane to Gympie. http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nd/3.0/au G Traffic flowing in Gazettal Direction This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY-ND) Licence. To A Traffic flowing against Gazettal Direction attribute this material, cite State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) 2013 B The combined traffic flow in both Directions

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix F – Validation of CoRTN Traffic Noise Model

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Calculated Traffic Noise Levels TNIA Validation

Receiver Floor L10(18h) dB(A) Noise logger GF 56.9

ATP Consulting Engineers 1

SoundPLAN 8.2

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix G – Tabulated Traffic Noise Levels

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Calculated Traffic Noise Levels - Facades Predicted 2033 Traffic Noise Levels

Receiver Floor Facade L10(12h) L10(1h) dB(A) dB(A) Activity 01 GF NE 60.6 62.5 Activity 02 GF NE 61.3 63.2 Activity 02 GF SE 58.7 60.6 Activity 02_Sleep GF NE 58.8 60.8 Activity 02_Sleep GF SE 58.0 60.0 Activity 02_Sleep GF SW 48.1 50.1 Activity 03 GF NE 59.3 61.2 Activity 03 GF NW 55.0 56.9 Activity 04 GF NW 57.9 59.9 Activity 04 GF SE 50.0 51.9 Activity 04 GF SW 49.7 51.6 Activity 05 GF NW 59.3 61.3 Activity 05 GF SE 54.2 56.1 Activity 06 GF NW 60.1 62.0 Activity 06 GF SE 54.1 56.0 Activity 07 GF NE 62.5 64.4 Activity 07 GF NW 62.1 64.0 Activity 07 GF SE 57.1 59.0

ATP Consulting Engineers 1

SoundPLAN 8.2

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Calculated Traffic Noise Levels - Outdoor Play Areas Predicted 2033 Traffic Noise Levels

Receiver Floor L10(12h) L10(1h) dB(A) dB(A) Playscape_North GF 62.4 64.4 Playscape_South GF 53.3 55.3 Playscape_Veranda GF 54.7 56.7

ATP Consulting Engineers 1

SoundPLAN 8.2

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix H – Traffic Noise Contours

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

5 2

5 5

5 2 ATP200425

Proposed Childcare Centre 5

5 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert

5 5 5 5

92 Traffic Noise Modelling 8

5 44536

5 Year 2033

4434 8 8

5 Ground Floor 6

1 (1.8m AGL) 1 6

6 4 6 1 Total View

4 6 7

7 Traffic noise level 6 4

7 6 Facade adjusted

76 73 0 7 7

3 7

7 6

6 1

0 Adjusted for Queensland Conditions

3 7

7 L dB(A) 0 4 7 6 10(1hr)

3 7 6

7 <= 43 76 61 73 Beaudesert-Nerang Road 70 76 73 43 < <= 46 70 67 8 46 < <= 49 67 48639 5 555524 2 49 < <= 52 67 64 64 52 < <= 55 1 64 6 4 61 55 < <= 58

456425 639 9 3 3 4 4 11-15 96

8 2 8 55 5

444 5 5 21 58 2 ive 58 < <= 61 5 61 d Dr

5 l 494 fie 5 198 36 er umm 61 < <= 64 5 S 52 5 58 443469 64 < <= 67 194 49436 55 54 9-13 67 < <= 70 43 56 4 429 192 5 70 < <= 73

2 55

55 42 9 5

5 Brooklands Drive 217 5 73 < <= 76 55 76 <

6439

4 2 215 5 55 52 6 496 4 Legend 443469 209-211 4 201 436 205-207 Adjacent building 193 Proposed development 52 49 Paved surface

Road noise emission line

49 Lot boundary

2 5 Noise barrier fence

49 Point receiver

4 9 SCALE @ A4 1:3600 0 12.5 25 50 75 100 125 150 m

4 Grid Spacing: 1m 6 Project Engineer: Bojan Todorovski Created: 27/07/2020 Processed with SoundPLAN 8.2

1 3 As per procedure of TMR Code of Practise Volume 1

Document Set ID:4 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

7 0

ATP200425 7

3 Proposed Childcare Centre

6 7 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Traffic Noise Modelling Beaudesert-Nerang Road Year 2033 Ground Floor 7 76 6 (1.8m AGL) 73 73 70 Zoom View

70 Traffic noise level Facade adjusted 67 Adjusted for Queensland Conditions1 L dB(A) 67 10(1hr)

<= 43 43 < <= 46 64 46 < <= 49 64 49 < <= 52 52 < <= 55 55 < <= 58 449 63 58 < <= 61 1 6 8 5 61 < <= 64 64 < <= 67 61

5 67 < <= 70 2 70 < <= 73 73 < <= 76 4493 4 76 < 198 6 Legend u Adjacent building 55 S Proposed development

Paved surface

Road noise emission line 55 Lot boundary

Noise barrier fence

Point receiver

96 544243 SCALE @ A4 1:900 0510 20 30 40 217 m Brooklands Drive Grid Spacing: 1m Project Engineer: Bojan Todorovski 55 Created: 27/07/2020 Processed with SoundPLAN 8.2 1 As per procedure of TMR Code of Practise Volume 1 Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

6 9

ATP200425

2 7

Proposed Childcare Centre 7

5 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert 7

8 Traffic Noise Modelling Year 2033 78 Beaudesert-Nerang Road 78 Ground Floor 75 75 72 (1.5m AGL)

72 Zoom View 69

69 Traffic noise level Free field Adjusted for Queensland Conditions1 66 L10(12hr)dB(A) 66 <= 48 48 < <= 51 51 < <= 54

63 63 54 < <= 57 57 < <= 60 0 6 60 < <= 63 48

63 < <= 66

5 1 66 < <= 69 69 < <= 72 72 < <= 75 60 75 < <= 78 78 < <= 81 4 198 8 81 < Legend u Adjacent building 54 S 4 Proposed development 57 5 Paved surface

Road noise emission line

Lot boundary

Noise barrier fence 57 Point receiver

Limit line - 63dB(A) criteria 51 48 SCALE @ A4 1:900 0510 20 30 40 217 m Brooklands Drive Grid Spacing: 1m 4 Project Engineer: Bojan Todorovski 5 Created: 27/07/2020 Processed with SoundPLAN 8.2 1 As per procedure of TMR Code of Practise Volume 1 Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix I – Tabulated Operational Noise Levels

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Predicted Operational Noise Levels at Adjacent Uses From Activities at Proposed Development

Leq,adj,1h Leq,adj,1h Leq,adj,1h Leq,adj,11 Leq,adj,4h Leq,adj,9h Receiver Name Floor Facade Day Evening Night Day Evening Night dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) 192 Brooklands Drive GF E 32 22 22 29 16 13 194 Brooklands Drive GF E 33 24 24 31 18 14 198 Brooklands Drive GF E 39 29 29 37 23 19 198 Brooklands Drive GF E 41 32 32 40 26 22 198 Brooklands Drive GF S 40 31 31 38 25 21 198 Brooklands Drive GF SE 38 28 28 36 22 18 2 Summerfield Drive GF W 33 22 22 31 16 12 201 Brooklands Drive GF E 33 24 24 31 18 14 205-207 Brooklands Drive GF N 39 29 29 36 23 20 209-211 Brooklands Drive GF N 40 31 31 36 25 21 215 Brooklands Drive GF N 40 31 31 36 25 21 217 Brooklands Drive GF N 37 28 28 35 22 18 217 Brooklands Drive GF W 37 28 28 35 22 19 4434 Beaudesert-Nerang Road GF S 28 16 16 26 10 7 5 Summerfield Drive GF N 34 25 25 32 19 15 5 Summerfield Drive GF W 34 25 25 32 19 15 9-13 Summerfield Drive GF N 32 21 21 29 15 12 9-13 Summerfield Drive GF W 32 22 22 30 16 12

ATP Consulting Engineers 1

SoundPLAN 8.2

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert ISO9613 Calculation Method Predicted Operational Noise Levels at Adjacent Uses From Activities at Proposed Development

Legend

Source Name of source Source type Type of source (point, line, area) Time slice Name of time slice Li dB(A) Level inside R'w dB Rated transmission loss L'w dB(A) Sound power level per m, m² Lw dB(A) Sound power level per unit l or A m,m² Size of source (length or area) KI dB Correction for source impulsiveness KT dB Correction for source tonality Ko dB Correction for propagation in limited spacial angle S m Distance source - receiver Adiv dB Mean attenuation due to geometrical spreading Agr dB Mean attenuation due to ground effect Abar dB Mean attenuation due to screening Aatm dB Mean attenuation due to air absorption Amisc dB Mean attenuation due to foliage, industrial areas and building areas ADI dB Mean directivity correction dLrefl dB Level increase due to reflections Ls dB(A) Unassessed sound pressure level at receiver Ls=Lw+Ko+ADI+Adiv+Agr+Abar+Aatm+Afol_site_house+Awind+dLrefl Cmet dB Meteorological correction dLw dB Correction due to source operation time ZR dB Correction for rest periods Lr dB(A) Assessed level of time slice

ATP Consulting Engineers 1

SoundPLAN 8.2

Source Source Time Li R'w L'w Lw l or A KI KT Ko S Adiv Agr Abar Aatm Amisc ADI dLrefl Ls Cmet dLw ZR Lr type slice dB(A) dB dB(A) dB(A) m,m² dB dB dB m dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB(A) dB dB dB dB(A) Receiver 198 Brooklands Drive Fl GF Dir E Leq,adj,1h 41 dB(A) AC Units_1 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 94.72 -50.5 -3.4 -14.7 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 AC Units_2 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 93.98 -50.5 -3.4 -14.7 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 AC Units_3 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 91.89 -50.3 -3.4 -14.5 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 AC Units_4 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 91.17 -50.2 -3.4 -14.5 -0.4 0.0 0.0 -3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 AC Units_5 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 52.13 -45.3 -2.9 -4.8 -0.2 0.0 3.1 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 AC Units_6 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 51.04 -45.2 -2.9 -4.7 -0.2 0.0 3.5 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.3 AC Units_7 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 50.04 -45.0 -2.9 -4.8 -0.2 0.0 3.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 AC Units_8 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 48.94 -44.8 -2.8 -4.8 -0.2 0.0 1.6 13.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 Delivery_Truck_Idling Point Leq,adj,1h 90.8 90.8 0.0 5.0 0 75.47 -48.5 -1.9 0.0 -0.6 0.0 0.0 39.8 0.0 Kitchen Exhaust Point Leq,adj,1h 71.0 71.0 0.0 5.0 0 72.88 -48.2 -0.1 0.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 58.3 77.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 0 88.38 -49.9 -1.3 -16.9 -0.5 0.0 0.1 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0-2_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 0-2_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 61.3 80.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 0 88.38 -49.9 -1.3 -16.9 -0.5 0.0 0.1 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 58.2 83.0 298.9 0.0 0.0 0 71.35 -48.1 -1.2 -8.4 -0.6 0.0 3.9 28.7 0.0 2-3_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 2-3_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 61.2 86.0 298.9 0.0 0.0 0 71.35 -48.1 -1.2 -8.4 -0.6 0.0 3.9 31.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.7 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 55.6 84.0 692.6 0.0 0.0 0 67.21 -47.5 -1.1 -4.3 -0.5 0.0 2.9 33.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.4 4-6_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 4-6_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 58.6 87.0 692.6 0.0 0.0 0 67.21 -47.5 -1.1 -4.3 -0.5 0.0 2.9 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.4 Refuse_Truck_Idling Point Leq,adj,1h 90.8 90.8 0.0 5.0 0 59.15 -46.4 -1.8 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 42.2 0.0 Refuse_Truck_Loading Point Leq,adj,1h 92.0 92.0 5.0 0.0 0 60.11 -46.6 -0.8 0.0 -1.6 0.0 0.0 43.1 0.0 Carpark PLot Leq,adj,1h 56.7 86.5 942.7 0.0 0.0 0 58.53 -46.3 -1.6 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.1 37.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.1

ATP Consulting Engineers 2

SoundPLAN 8.2

Source Source Time Li R'w L'w Lw l or A KI KT Ko S Adiv Agr Abar Aatm Amisc ADI dLrefl Ls Cmet dLw ZR Lr type slice dB(A) dB dB(A) dB(A) m,m² dB dB dB m dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB(A) dB dB dB dB(A) Receiver 209-211 Brooklands Drive Fl GF Dir N Leq,adj,1h 40 dB(A) AC Units_1 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 81.60 -49.2 -3.0 -3.1 -0.8 0.0 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 AC Units_2 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 80.39 -49.1 -3.0 -3.1 -0.8 0.0 0.2 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.1 AC Units_3 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 76.42 -48.7 -2.9 -7.2 -0.4 0.0 0.2 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.8 AC Units_4 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 75.11 -48.5 -2.9 -10.5 -0.3 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 AC Units_5 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 89.93 -50.1 -3.1 -18.0 -0.3 0.0 11.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 AC Units_6 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 88.81 -50.0 -3.1 -18.1 -0.3 0.0 10.7 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 AC Units_7 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 87.73 -49.9 -3.1 -16.0 -0.2 0.0 8.6 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.2 AC Units_8 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 86.58 -49.7 -3.1 -4.6 -0.5 0.0 1.3 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 Delivery_Truck_Idling Point Leq,adj,1h 90.8 90.8 0.0 5.0 0 57.11 -46.1 -0.3 -1.7 -0.5 0.0 1.1 43.3 0.0 -14.8 0.0 33.5 Kitchen Exhaust Point Leq,adj,1h 71.0 71.0 0.0 5.0 0 76.10 -48.6 0.4 -0.3 -1.2 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 58.3 77.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 0 88.68 -49.9 -1.0 -12.2 -0.7 0.0 0.6 13.8 0.0 0-2_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 0-2_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 61.3 80.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 0 88.68 -49.9 -1.0 -12.2 -0.7 0.0 0.6 16.8 0.0 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 58.2 83.0 298.9 0.0 0.0 0 87.55 -49.8 -1.0 -20.8 -0.5 0.0 2.2 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.1 2-3_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 2-3_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 61.2 86.0 298.9 0.0 0.0 0 87.55 -49.8 -1.0 -20.8 -0.5 0.0 2.2 16.1 0.0 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 55.6 84.0 692.6 0.0 0.0 0 96.46 -50.7 -1.0 -9.5 -0.6 0.0 1.8 24.1 0.0 4-6_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 4-6_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 58.6 87.0 692.6 0.0 0.0 0 96.46 -50.7 -1.0 -9.5 -0.6 0.0 1.8 27.1 0.0 Refuse_Truck_Idling Point Leq,adj,1h 90.8 90.8 0.0 5.0 0 55.16 -45.8 -0.3 -2.6 -0.5 0.0 0.1 41.7 0.0 -14.8 0.0 31.9 Refuse_Truck_Loading Point Leq,adj,1h 92.0 92.0 5.0 0.0 0 56.53 -46.0 0.4 -1.7 -2.0 0.0 0.6 43.4 0.0 -14.8 0.0 33.6 Carpark PLot Leq,adj,1h 56.7 86.5 942.7 0.0 0.0 0 59.43 -46.5 -0.5 -3.5 -0.6 0.0 0.4 35.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.8

ATP Consulting Engineers 3

SoundPLAN 8.2

Source Source Time Li R'w L'w Lw l or A KI KT Ko S Adiv Agr Abar Aatm Amisc ADI dLrefl Ls Cmet dLw ZR Lr type slice dB(A) dB dB(A) dB(A) m,m² dB dB dB m dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB(A) dB dB dB dB(A) Receiver 215 Brooklands Drive Fl GF Dir N Leq,adj,1h 40 dB(A) AC Units_1 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 64.82 -47.2 -2.8 -0.4 -0.8 0.0 0.8 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.3 AC Units_2 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 64.03 -47.1 -2.8 -0.4 -0.8 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.6 AC Units_3 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 61.36 -46.7 -2.8 -1.5 -0.9 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.8 AC Units_4 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 60.55 -46.6 -2.8 -1.5 -0.9 0.0 0.1 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.1 AC Units_5 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 94.19 -50.5 -3.1 -18.3 -0.3 0.0 0.0 -7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.4 AC Units_6 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 93.74 -50.4 -3.1 -18.2 -0.3 0.0 0.0 -7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.2 AC Units_7 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 93.30 -50.4 -3.1 -18.2 -0.3 0.0 0.0 -7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.2 AC Units_8 Point Leq,adj,1h 64.8 64.8 0.0 5.0 0 92.88 -50.4 -3.1 -18.2 -0.3 0.0 2.1 -5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delivery_Truck_Idling Point Leq,adj,1h 90.8 90.8 0.0 5.0 0 57.24 -46.1 -0.4 -0.2 -0.4 0.0 0.0 43.6 0.0 -14.8 0.0 33.8 Kitchen Exhaust Point Leq,adj,1h 71.0 71.0 0.0 5.0 0 71.87 -48.1 0.3 0.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 58.3 77.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 0 74.78 -48.5 -0.8 -6.3 -0.6 0.0 0.1 20.9 0.0 0-2_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 0-2_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 61.3 80.0 74.8 0.0 0.0 0 74.78 -48.5 -0.8 -6.3 -0.6 0.0 0.1 23.9 0.0 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 58.2 83.0 298.9 0.0 0.0 0 83.54 -49.4 -1.0 -21.0 -0.5 0.0 3.4 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.5 2-3_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 2-3_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 61.2 86.0 298.9 0.0 0.0 0 83.54 -49.4 -1.0 -21.0 -0.5 0.0 3.4 17.5 0.0 Outdoor play_Children Area Leq,adj,1h 55.6 84.0 692.6 0.0 0.0 0 92.26 -50.3 -1.0 -8.9 -0.7 0.0 0.6 23.8 0.0 4-6_Off-Peak Outdoor play_Children 4-6_Peak Area Leq,adj,1h 58.6 87.0 692.6 0.0 0.0 0 92.26 -50.3 -1.0 -8.9 -0.7 0.0 0.6 26.8 0.0 Refuse_Truck_Idling Point Leq,adj,1h 90.8 90.8 0.0 5.0 0 69.33 -47.8 -0.2 -1.5 -0.6 0.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 -14.8 0.0 30.9 Refuse_Truck_Loading Point Leq,adj,1h 92.0 92.0 5.0 0.0 0 68.73 -47.7 0.4 -0.8 -2.0 0.0 0.8 42.5 0.0 -14.8 0.0 32.8 Carpark PLot Leq,adj,1h 56.7 86.5 942.7 0.0 0.0 0 64.68 -47.2 -0.8 -2.6 -0.7 0.0 0.1 35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.3

ATP Consulting Engineers 4

SoundPLAN 8.2

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix J – Operational Noise Contour Maps

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 4434 ATP200425 Proposed Childcare Centre 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Noise Levels Associated with Proposed Development

Ground Floor (1.8m AGL)

Total View

Operational noise level Leq,adj,1hr Day dB(A)

<= 38 38 < <= 41 41 < <= 44 44 < <= 47 47 < <= 50 50 < <= 53 Beaudesert-Nerang Road 53 < <= 56 38 56 < <= 59 59 < <= 62 62 < <= 65 2 65 < <= 68 41 68 < <= 71

4 71 < 7 4 4 Legend 0 5 9630741 41 53 3548 6 Adjacent building 5 3 e 8 v 9 ri 5 5 D Proposed development 6 ld 5 543073418 2 ie 38 198 6 erf 9 m Paved surface 5 m 4 u 4 S Area source 5 194 9 9-13 Parking lot 56 5 3 Lot boundary 5 0 7 5 192 4 Noise barrier fence Brooklands Drive 217 1 Point receiver

4 8 4 3 Point source

4 1 215 3 8 41 SCALE @ A4 1:2000 209-211 01020 40 60 80 201 m 205-207 38 Grid Spacing: 1m 193 Project Engineer: Bojan Todorovski Created: 27/07/2020 Processed with SoundPLAN 8.2 Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 4434 ATP200425 Proposed Childcare Centre 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Noise Levels Associated with Proposed Development

Ground Floor (1.8m AGL)

Total View

Operational noise level Leq,adj,1hr Evening dB(A)

<= 38 38 < <= 41 41 < <= 44 44 < <= 47 47 < <= 50 50 < <= 53 Beaudesert-Nerang Road 53 < <= 56 56 < <= 59 59 < <= 62 62 < <= 65 2 65 < <= 68 68 < <= 71 71 < Legend Adjacent building 4 4 ve 4 ri 5 7 d D Proposed development 1 el 4 i 198 7 rf 4 me Paved surface Sum Area source 8

3 4 194 4 Parking lot 5 9-13 47 50 4 1 Lot boundary 3 4 4 192 8 Noise barrier fence 38 217 Brooklands Drive Point receiver

Point source 215 SCALE @ A4 1:2000 209-211 01020 40 60 80 201 m 205-207 Grid Spacing: 1m 193 Project Engineer: Bojan Todorovski Created: 27/07/2020 Processed with SoundPLAN 8.2 Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 4434 ATP200425 Proposed Childcare Centre 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Noise Levels Associated with Proposed Development

Ground Floor (1.8m AGL)

Total View

Operational noise level Leq,adj,1hr Night dB(A)

3 4 194 4 Parking lot 5 9-13 47 50 4 1 Lot boundary 3 4 4 192 8 Noise barrier fence 38 217 Brooklands Drive Point receiver

Appendix K – Traffic Noise Attenuation Specifications

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 APPENDIX K EVALUATION OF BUILDING COMPONENTS AS3671-1989 Lot 501 on RP808820, Beaudesert Childcare Centre

Activity Room 01 Ground floor Construction Item Rw Req Requirement Ceiling/Roof 36 Directivity fct. Rw Final External Wall 30 0 30 Window - Directly facing road 30 0 30 Window - Perpendicular to road 30 -3 27

Activity Room 02 Ground floor Construction Item Rw Req Requirement Ceiling/Roof 37 Directivity fct. Rw Final External Wall 36 0 36 Window - Directly facing road 31 0 31

Activity Room 03 Ground floor Construction Item Rw Req Requirement Ceiling/Roof 35 Directivity fct. Rw Final External Wall 33 0 33 Window - Directly facing road 30 0 30 Window - Perpendicular to road 30 -3 27

Activity Room 04 Ground floor Construction Item Rw Req Requirement Ceiling/Roof 34 Directivity fct. Rw Final External Wall 31 0 31 Window - Perpendicular to road 29 -3 26 Window - Shielded from road 29 -8 21

Activity Room 05 Ground floor Construction Item Rw Req Requirement Ceiling/Roof 35 Directivity fct. Rw Final External Wall 29 0 29 Window - Perpendicular to road 28 -3 25

Activity Room 06 Ground floor Construction Item Rw Req Requirement Ceiling/Roof 36 Directivity fct. Rw Final External Wall 30 0 30 Window - Perpendicular to road 29 -3 26

Activity Room 07 Ground floor Construction Item Rw Req Requirement Ceiling/Roof 38 Directivity fct. Rw Final External Wall 36 0 36 Window - Directly facing road 33 0 33 Window - Perpendicular to road 33 -3 30

AD_Beaudesert Childcare Centre_TNAc Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020

Appendix L – Rw Ratings for the Windows

Client: Pano Pty Ltd Doc No.: ATP200425-R-NIA-01 Doc Title: Noise Impact Assessment

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Appendix L – Rw Values for Window/Door Glazing

Lot 501 on RP808820, Beaudesert Childcare Centre

Window/Door Window/Door R Location Elevation w Recommended Construction Code Size (mm) Value Ground Floor Activity Room 01 3 D01 2100 x 2400 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 01 3 W01 1800 x 1800 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 01 4 W02 1800 x 900 27 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 02 3 D02 2100 x 2400 31 6.76mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 02 3 W24 1800 x 900 31 6.76mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 02 3 W03 1800 x 900 31 6.76mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 02 3 W04 1800 x 900 31 6.76mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 03 3 D03 2100 x 2400 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 03 3 W05 1800 x 1800 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 03 4 W06 1800 x 900 27 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 03 4 W07 1800 x 900 27 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 03 4 W08 1800 x 900 27 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 04 4 D04 2100 x 2400 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 04 4 W09 1800 x 900 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 04 1 W10 1800 x 1800 21 Standard 4mm float glass with standard weather seals Activity Room 04 1 D05 2100 x 2400 21 Standard 4mm float glass with standard weather seals Activity Room 04 1 W11 1800 x 1800 21 Standard 4mm float glass with standard weather seals Activity Room 04 2 W12 1800 x 1800 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 04 2 D06 2100 x 2400 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Appendix L – Rw Values for Window/Door Glazing

Lot 501 on RP808820, Beaudesert Childcare Centre Activity Room 05 4 D07 2100 x 2400 25 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 05 4 W13 1800 x 900 25 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 05 2 W14 1800 x 900 25 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 05 2 D08 2100 x 2400 25 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 05 2 W15 1800 x 600 25 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 06 4 W16 1800 x 900 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 06 4 D09 2100 x 2400 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 06 2 W17 1800 x 1800 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 06 2 D10 2100 x 2400 26 Standard 4mm float glass in an acoustically sealed frame Activity Room 07 4 D11 2100 x 2400 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 3 W18 1800 x 900 33 10.38mm laminated safety glass, or 6.5mm Vlam Hush glass, in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 3 W19 1800 x 900 33 10.38mm laminated safety glass, or 6.5mm Vlam Hush glass, in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 3 D12 2100 x 2400 33 10.38mm laminated safety glass, or 6.5mm Vlam Hush glass, in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 3 W20 1800 x 900 33 10.38mm laminated safety glass, or 6.5mm Vlam Hush glass, in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 3 W21 1800 x 900 33 10.38mm laminated safety glass, or 6.5mm Vlam Hush glass, in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 2 W22 1800 x 900 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 2 W23 1800 x 900 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 2 D13 2100 x 2400 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2) Activity Room 07 2 D13 2100 x 2400 30 6.38mm laminated safety glass in an acoustically sealed frame (Note 2)

Note 1: The Rw rating required for each window will generally vary from room to room. For ease of construction however the same type of system can be incorporated into similar locations provided the system that satisfies the most stringent acoustic requirement is utilized. Recommendations for windows also applies to any glazing in doors and any other item of glazing located on the external façade of a habitable room unless stated otherwise.

Note 2: For sliding systems requiring Rw ratings over 27 it is difficult to predict the performance of sliding window/door systems due to the variances in frame design and construction. It is recommended to contact the manufacturers of proprietary sliding window/door systems that have been either tested for acoustic performance or have a guaranteed acoustic performance rating.

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Development Assessment Rules—Representations about a referral agency response

The following provisions are those set out in sections 28 and 30 of the Development Assessment Rules1 regarding representations about a referral agency response

Part 6: Changes to the application and referral agency responses

28 Concurrence agency changes its response or gives a late response

28.1. Despite part 2, a concurrence agency may, after its referral agency assessment period and any further period agreed ends, change its referral agency response or give a late referral agency response before the application is decided, subject to section 28.2 and 28.3. 28.2. A concurrence agency may change its referral agency response at any time before the application is decided if— (a) the change is in response to a change which the assessment manager is satisfied is a change under section 26.1; or (b) the Minister has given the concurrence agency a direction under section 99 of the Act; or (c) the applicant has given written agreement to the change to the referral agency response.2

28.3. A concurrence agency may give a late referral agency response before the application is decided, if the applicant has given written agreement to the late referral agency response. 28.4. If a concurrence agency proposes to change its referral agency response under section 28.2(a), the concurrence agency must— (a) give notice of its intention to change its referral agency response to the assessment manager and a copy to the applicant within 5 days of receiving notice of the change under section 25.1; and (b) the concurrence agency has 10 days from the day of giving notice under paragraph (a), or a further period agreed between the applicant and the concurrence agency, to give an amended referral agency response to the assessment manager and a copy to the applicant.

1 Pursuant to Section 68 of the Planning Act 2016 2 In the instance an applicant has made representations to the concurrence agency under section 30, and the concurrence agency agrees to make the change included in the representations, section 28.2(c) is taken to have been satisfied.

Page 1 of 2

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 Part 7: Miscellaneous

30 Representations about a referral agency response

30.1. An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency at any time before the application is decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response.3

3 An applicant may elect, under section 32, to stop the assessment manager’s decision period in which to take this action. If a concurrence agency wishes to amend their response in relation to representations made under this section, they must do so in accordance with section 28.

Page 2 of 2

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 RA6-N

SARA reference: 2008-18332 SRA Council reference: MCU20/072 Applicant reference: 200135

30 September 2020

Chief Executive Officer Scenic Rim Regional Council PO Box 25 BEAUDESERT QLD 4285 [email protected]

Attention: Mr Kobi Lane

Dear Mr Lane

SARA response—202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert (Referral agency response given under section 56 of the Planning Act 2016)

The development application described below was confirmed as properly referred by the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) on 18 August 2020.

Response Outcome: Referral agency response – with conditions Date of response: 30 September 2020 Conditions: The conditions in Attachment 1 must be attached to any development approval Advice: Advice to the applicant is in Attachment 2 Reasons: The reasons for the referral agency response are in Attachment 3

Development details

Description: Development permit Material Change of Use - (Childcare Centre) Operational Works - Civil Works (Stormwater and Earthworks)

SARA role: Referral Agency SARA trigger: Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 4, Item 1 (Planning Regulation 2017)

Development application for a material change of use within 25m of a state-controlled road

South East Queensland (West) regional office Page 1 of 7 PO Box 2390, NORTH IPSWICH QLD 4305

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 2008-18332 SRA

SARA reference: 2008-18332 SRA Assessment Manager: Scenic Rim Regional Council Street address: 202 Brooklands Drive, Beaudesert Real property description: Lot 501 on RP808820 Applicant name: Pano Pty Ltd Applicant contact details: Level 2, 127 Creek Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 [email protected]

Representations

An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency, at any time before the application is decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response (section 30 of the Development Assessment Rules). Copies of the relevant provisions are in Attachment 4.

A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information.

For further information please contact Darrian Borick, Principal Planner, on 3432 2411 or via email [email protected] who will be pleased to assist.

Yours sincerely

Warren Oxnam Planning Manager SEQ West

cc Pano Pty Ltd, [email protected]

enc Attachment 1 - Referral agency conditions Attachment 2 - Advice to the applicant Attachment 3 - Reasons for referral agency response Attachment 4 - Representations provisions Attachment 5 - Approved plans and specifications

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 2 of 7

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 2008-18332 SRA

Attachment 1—Referral agency conditions (Under section 56(1)(b)(i) of the Planning Act 2016 the following conditions must be attached to any development approval relating to this application) (Copies of the plans and specifications referenced below are found at Attachment 5)

No. Conditions Condition timing Material Change of Use for Childcare Centre Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 4, Item 1 —The chief executive administering the Planning Act 2016 nominates the Director-General of the Department of Transport and Main Roads to be the enforcement authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following condition(s): 1. The stormwater management must be managed and conveyed Prior to the generally in accordance with the following plan: commencement of use and to be maintained at  Stormwater Management Layout prepared by Pinnacle all times. Engineering Group, dated 24 July 2020, drawing number PEG0685-DA-SK03 and revision B. 2. (a) Carry out the development generally in accordance with the report (a) and (b) Prior to the Noise Impact Assessment prepared by ATP Consulting, dated commencement of use September 2020, reference ATP200425-R-NIA-02 and revision 2. and to be maintained at In particular – all times. (i) Construct a 1.8 metre noise barrier in the location shown on Figure 5.1 Alignment of the recommended noise barrier fence (c) Prior to the prepared by ATP Consulting, dated September 2020, commencement of use. reference ATP200425-R-NIA-02 and revision 2, as amended in red.

(b) The noise barrier must be designed in accordance with: (i) Chapter 7 integrated noise barrier design of the Transport Noise Management Code of Practice: Volume 1 (Road Traffic Noise), Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013 (ii) the Department of Transport and Main Roads' Road Traffic Noise Management Code of Practice, Chapter 5’ Specification MRTS15 (iii) Standard Drawings Road Manual for Noise Fences.

(c) RPEQ certification with supporting documentation must be provided to the South Coast Region ([email protected]) of the Department of Transport and Main Roads, confirming that the development has been constructed in accordance with parts (a) and (b) of this condition. 3. Noise attenuation measures to achieve the following noise criteria must (a) Prior to the be provided: commencement of use and to be maintained at (a) Buildings are designed and constructed using materials which all times. ensure all indoor education areas and indoor play areas meet the following internal noise criteria: (b) Prior to the (i) ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during opening hours) commencement of use.

(b) RPEQ certification with supporting documentation must be provided to the South Coast Region ([email protected]) of the Department of Transport and Main Roads, confirming that the development has been constructed in accordance with part (a) of this condition.

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 3 of 7

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 2008-18332 SRA

Attachment 2—Advice to the applicant

General advice 1. Terms and phrases used in this document are defined in the Planning Act 2016 its regulation or the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) v2.6. If a word remains undefined it has its ordinary meaning. 2. Works for an Acoustic Barrier Fence

To demonstrate compliance with condition 2, and in accordance with MRTS15 (available at: https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/business-industry/Technical-standards-publications /Specifications.aspx), no works for the construction of an acoustic fence for mitigation of road traffic noise of a state-controlled road are to commence until acceptance of the plan/s showing the proposed works is issued by the Department of Transport and Main Roads.

Please note this process will require the acceptance of engineering designs of the proposed works, certified by a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ). This approval may be subject to conditions related to the works construction process. Please contact the South Coast Region within the Department of Transport and Main Roads on (07) 5563 6600 or at [email protected] to make an application.

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 7

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 2008-18332 SRA

Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response (Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for SARA’s decision are:  The development application is for a Material Change of Use for Childcare Centre and Operational Works – Civil (Stormwater and Earthworks).  The premises are identified as being within 25m of a state-controlled road.  The development application was required to be assessed against the State Development Assessment Provisions, Version 2.6, State Code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment.  The development application can comply with the provisions of State Code 1 through conditions to ensure that any impacts from stormwater on the state-controlled road is managed in accordance with the approved stormwater management layout.  Further noise impacts from the state-controlled road are to be managed in accordance with the approved noise impact assessment which includes noise attenuation measures, such as the construction of a 1.8 metre noise barrier, and for all indoor education and play areas. to meet prescribed noise criteria.  SARA has had regard to the strategic outcomes and purpose statements of the zone and overlay codes of the Scenic Rim Planning Scheme 2020, the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017, and the State Planning Policy 2017, and the development application is not inconsistent with those instruments.

Material used in the assessment of the application:

 The development application material and submitted plans  Planning Act 2016  Planning Regulation 2017  The State Development Assessment Provisions (version 2.6), as published by SARA  The Development Assessment Rules  SARA DA Mapping system  State Planning Policy mapping system.

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 7

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 2008-18332 SRA

Attachment 4—Change representation provisions

(page left intentionally blank)

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 6 of 7

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020 2008-18332 SRA

Attachment 5—Approved plans and specifications

(page left intentionally blank)

State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 7 of 7

Document Set ID: 11050267 Version: 1, Version Date: 30/09/2020