Recovery Plan for the Bank Swallow (Riparia Riparia) in Nova Scotia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recovery Plan for the Bank Swallow (Riparia Riparia) in Nova Scotia RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE BANK SWALLOW (RIPARIA RIPARIA) IN NOVA SCOTIA A recovery plan adopted by the Nova Scotia Department of Lands and Forestry 2020 – 2021 Recommended citation: Nova Scotia Department of Lands and Forestry. 2020. Recovery Plan for the Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) in Nova Scotia [Final]. Nova Scotia Endangered Species Act Recovery Plan Series. Cover illustration: Bank Swallow — Photo by Jonathan Eckerson / Macaulay Library Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. Adoption of a Recovery Plan per Section 15(9) of the Endangered Species Act Species: Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) Reference: Falconer, M., K. Richardson, A. Heagy, D. Tozer, B. Stewart, J. McCracken, and R. Reid. 2016. Recovery Strategy for the Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario. ix + 70 pp. Government of Canada. Species at Risk Act Public Registry. Residence Descriptions. Description of residence for Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) in Canada. May 2019. (September 29, 2020). Whereas a Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy has been prepared for this species by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, and that plan has been reviewed by members of the applicable Nova Scotia Recovery Team and determined to fulfil the requirements of Section 15(4) of the Endangered Species Act as they pertain to Nova Scotia, the above-named recovery strategy and residence description shall be adopted in lieu of a Nova Scotia Recovery Plan subject to the following: Date of Adoption: 9 November 2020 Expiry/renewal Date: 9 November 2021 Conditions: 1. Adoption of this recovery plan will be reviewed 1 year from the Date of Adoption. 2. Only elements of this plan that are relevant to Nova Scotia and are in accordance with the Endangered Species Act (Nova Scotia) shall be used. This includes the following sections of the reports: Falconer et al. (2016). Species Description and Biology (1.2), Distribution, Abundance, and Population Trends (1.3), Habitat Needs (1.4), Limiting Factors (1.5), Knowledge Gaps (1.7), Recovery Actions Completed or Underway (1.8), Narrative to Support Recovery Goal (2.1), Approaches to Recovery (2.3), Area for Consideration in Developing Habitat Regulation (2.4), Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessment of Species, Habitat, or Threats (1.8). Although not described in detail here, it has been noted by the Recovery Team that specific Knowledge Gaps (such as breeding productivity and adult return rates to colonies, diet, and foraging patterns), Actions Already Completed or Underway (under the subheading research), as well as actions under Approaches to Recovery in Table 4 have already been addressed since the publication of the Recovery Strategy. Individuals and/or agencies using this adopted Recovery Plan should seek additional guidance from the Recovery Team and/or the Biodiversity Program, Department of Lands and Forestry as needed. 3. Should any additional requirements be identified the Nova Scotia Department of Lands and Forestry may prepare an addendum to this plan under the Endangered Species Act. Approved: Date: 9 November 2020 Appendix A: Falconer, M., K. Richardson, A. Heagy, D. Tozer, B. Stewart, J. McCracken, and R. Reid. 2016. Recovery Strategy for the Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario. ix + 70 pp. Photo: Tianna BurkePhoto: Tianna Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 2016 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by Nine months after the completion of a which the decline of an endangered, recovery strategy a government response threatened, or extirpated species is arrested or statement will be published which summarizes reversed, and threats are removed or reduced the actions that the Government of Ontario to improve the likelihood of a species’ intends to take in response to the strategy. persistence in the wild. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, What is a recovery strategy? communities, land users, and Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides conservationists. the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species. A For more information recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the survival and recovery of To learn more about species at risk recovery the species. It also makes recommendations in Ontario, please visit the Ministry of Natural on the objectives for protection and recovery, Resources and Forestry Species at Risk the approaches to achieve those objectives, webpage at: and the area that should be considered in the www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk development of a habitat regulation. Sections 11 to 15 of the ESA outline the required content and timelines for developing recovery strategies published in this series. Recovery strategies are required to be prepared for endangered and threatened species within one or two years respectively of the species being added to the Species at Risk in Ontario list. Recovery strategies are required to be prepared for extirpated species only if reintroduction is considered feasible. Recovery Strategy for the Bank Swallow in Ontario RECOMMENDED CITATION Falconer, M., K. Richardson, A. Heagy, D. Tozer, B. Stewart, J. McCracken, and R. Reid. 2016. Recovery Strategy for the Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario. ix + 70 pp. Cover illustration: Photo by Tianna Burke © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2016 ISBN 978-1-4606-7672-1 (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4606-7681-3 (PDF) Content (excluding the cover illustration) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. Cette publication hautement spécialisée « Recovery strategies prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 », n’est disponible qu’en Anglais en vertu du Règlement 411/97 qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec [email protected]. i Recovery Strategy for the Bank Swallow in Ontario AUTHORS Myles Falconer, Bird Studies Canada Kristyn Richardson, Bird Studies Canada Audrey Heagy, Bird Studies Canada Doug Tozer, Bird Studies Canada Becky Stewart, Bird Studies Canada Jon McCracken, Bird Studies Canada Ron Reid, Bobolink Enterprises ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for the preparation of this recovery strategy was provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF) through a contract to Bird Studies Canada (BSC). Many thanks to Jay Fitzsimmons (OMNRF) and Amanda Fracz (OMNRF) for overseeing project delivery. We would like to thank everyone who participated in the technical workshops held at Guelph, Ontario on 11 September 2014 and 5 March 2015. Their names and affiliations are as follows: Carolyn Zanchetta Bird Studies Canada Liza Barney Bird Studies Canada Stephen May CBM Aggregates Mike Lebreton CBM Aggregates Greg Mitchell Environment and Climate Change Canada Mike Cadman Environment and Climate Change Canada Ben Dopson G. Tackaberry and Sons Construction Co. Ltd. Sean Male Hatch Ltd. John Bayliss Holcim (Canada) Inc George Antoniuk Miller Group Jill Crosthwaite Nature Conservancy of Canada Sonje Bols Nippissing University Brandon Holden Ontario Field Ornithologists Ken Burrell Ontario Field Ornithologists Peter Roberts Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Alison Clark Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Andrew Chard Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Chris Risley Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Jay Fitzsimmons Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Joe Nocera Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Mark Browning Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry ii Recovery Strategy for the Bank Swallow in Ontario Stephen Douglas Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Larry Sarris Ontario Ministry of Transportation Dan Gibson Ontario Power Generation Marianne Leung Ontario Power Generation Cynthia Robinson Ontario Stone, Sand and Gravel Association Anthony Chegano Saugeen First Nation Esme Batten Saugeen First Nation Jo-Anne Harbinson Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority Paul General Six Nations Debbie Badzinski Stantec Karen McDonald Toronto Region Conservation Authority Erica Nol Trent University Tianna Burke Trent University Chris Guigelemo University of Western Ontario iii Recovery Strategy for the Bank Swallow in Ontario DECLARATION The recovery strategy for the Bank Swallow was developed in accordance with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). This recovery
Recommended publications
  • Barn Swallows AKA: Mud Swallows
    Barn Swallows AKA: Mud Swallows. Close relatives: Purple Martin, Cliff Swallow, Tree Swallow Scientific Classification: Animalia, Chordata, Aves, Passeriformes, Hirundinidae; Hirundo; H. rustica. Bird Size & Markings: Adult Barn Swallows are about 7” long, stand 4” high and have a 13” wingspan. They weigh less than 1 ounce. Males have metallic blue back, wings, and tail with rufous to tawny underside. The blue crown and face is contrasted with the cinnamon forehead and throat. Females are not as brightly colored. Habitat: You can find Barn Swallows feeding in open habitats such as fields, parks, marshes, meadows, ponds, and coastal waters. Their nests are often easy to spot under protected overhangs. Nesting/Dens: Barn Swallows lay 3 to 7 eggs in each brood and can hatch broods twice a year. Brood fledge in about 2 weeks. Both sexes construct the nest of mud pel- lets. If attached to a wall or beam, the nest is half-cup shaped. If on top of a surface, A mating pair of Barn Swallows. They prefer to the nest forms a perfect small cup about 3” wide. Nest sites are almost exclusively at- build their nests where there is overhead pro- tached to man made structures with overhead protection; roof eaves, the underside tection from the weather. of bridges, inside barns and stables, etc. Food: Barn Swallows eat insects - both flying and terrestrial. They usually take rela- tively large, single insects rather than feeding on swarms of smaller prey. They typi- cally feed just above shallow waters or turf. They have been known to follow tractors and livestock, eating the insects that are flushed out by their movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Entomological Society
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL , SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. I. Part 1 (). HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS SIPHONAPTERA 13y F. G. A. M. SMIT LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms - 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 21st June, I9S7 Price £1 os. od. ACCESSION NUMBER ....... ................... British Entomological & Natural History Society c/o Dinton Pastures Country Park, Davis Street, Hurst, OTS - Reading, Berkshire RG 10 OTH .•' Presented by Date Librarian R EGULATIONS I.- No member shall be allowed to borrow more than five volumes at a time, or to keep any of tbem longer than three months. 2.-A member shall at any time on demand by the Librarian forthwith return any volumes in his possession. 3.-Members damaging, losing, or destroying any book belonging to the Society shall either provide a new copy or pay such sum as tbe Council shall tbink fit. ) "1' > ) I .. ··•• · ·• "V>--· .•. .t ... -;; ·· · ·- ~~- -~· · · ····· · · { · · · l!i JYt.11'ian, ,( i-es; and - REGU--LATIONS dthougll 1.- Books may b - ~dapted, ; ~ 2 -~ . e borrowed at . !.l :: - --- " . ~ o Member shall b . all Meeflfll(s of the So J t Volumes at a time o; ,IJJowed to borrow more c e y . 3.- An y Mem ber r t '. to keep them lonl{er th than three b.ecorn_e SPecified f e a Jn!ng a \'oJume a n one m on th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Nest Construction in Swallows (Hirundinidae) Is Associated with the Decrease of Clutch Size
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 38/1 711-716 21.7.2006 The evolution of nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is associated with the decrease of clutch size P. HENEBERG A b s t r a c t : Variability of the nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is more diverse than in other families of oscine birds. I compared the nest-building behaviour with pooled data of clutch size and overall hatching success for 20 species of swallows. The clutch size was significantly higher in temperate cavity-adopting swallow species than in species using other nesting modes including species breeding in evolutionarily advanced mud nests (P<0.05) except of the burrow-excavating Bank Swallow. Decrease of the clutch size during the evolution of nest construction is not compensated by the increase of the overall hatching success. K e y w o r d s : Hirundinidae, nest construction, clutch size, evolution Birds use distinct methods to avoid nest-predation: active nest defence, nest camouflage and concealment or sheltered nesting. While large and powerful species prefer active nest-defence, swallows and martins usually prefer construction of sheltered nests (LLOYD 2004). The nests of swallows vary from natural cavities in trees and rocks, to self-exca- vated burrows to mud retorts and cups attached to vertical faces. Much attention has been devoted to the importance of controlling for phylogeny in com- parative tests (HARVEY & PAGEL 1991), including molecular phylogenetic studies of swallows (WINKLER & SHELDON 1993). Interactions between the nest-construction va- riability and the clutch size, however, had been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Reasons Why People Fail to Attract Purple Martins
    Ten Reasons Why People Fail to Attract Purple Martins Over one million North Americans maintain housing for way out in open fields, or next to isolated ponds, rarely lished sites, martins will not recognize, as potential Purple Martins. Unfortunately, only a small percentage of results in successful martin attraction. Martin housing breeding sites, any martin housing with closed holes. these folks successfully attract breeding martins. Below is should be placed in the center of the most open spot A few compartments should be left open on each side a list of the top ten reasons why so many people fail. Your available, about 30’-100’ from human housing. If your of the house. chances of attracting martins will greatly increase if you martin housing hasn’t attracted nesting martins and In contrast, landlords that had breeding martins avoid making these common mistakes. isn’t placed within 100 feet of your house, try moving the previous year can leave their housing completely it closer. closed up, if they choose, until the martins return and 1. Housing placed too close to tall trees or in land on the housing. They can do this because Purple yards that are too enclosed. The main reason people 4. Housing not painted white. Although martins Martins exhibit a very high level of site fidelity — once fail to attract martins is that they place their martin have been known to nest in houses and gourds painted they have bred successfully at a specific location, the housing incorrectly within their yards, or their yards are other colors, white housing seems to attract them best.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Swallow in Scilly: New to the Western Palearctic Jeremy Hickman
    Tree Swallow in Scilly: new to the Western Palearctic Jeremy Hickman The Isles of Scilly is renowned as a haven for displaced migrant birds, and the autumn pilgrimage of observers in September and October is famous in ornithological circles. June is usually a quiet month for numbers of visiting birdwatchers, as are the other months outside the autumn, but June 1990 was the exception. In one five-day period, between 800 and 1,000 people came to see one bird: the first record for Britain & Ireland, Europe and the Western Palearctic of a North American species, Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor. On Wednesday 6th June 1990, having finished my shift behind the bar in the Mermaid Inn, I decided to go to Porth Hellick. I watched from the main hide for a while and could hardly believe how devoid of bird life it was. I could not even console myself by counting the Moorhens Gallinula chloropus. At about 19.00 BST, five hirundines approached low over the pool: one House Martin Delichon urbica, three Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica and another bird. This fifth bird gave the impression of a martin, but with no white rump and a glossy blue-green mantle and crown, and pure white underparts. My heart sank as the bird then flew to the back of the pool and began hawking around the pines and surrounding fields. I rushed to Sluice to obtain closer views and to note its plumage in detail. It appeared slightly bigger and bulkier in the body than a House Martin, with broader-based wings and more powerful flight.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Mangrove Swallow Recorded in the United States
    The First Mangrove Swallow recorded in the United States INTRODUCTION tem with a one-lane unsurfaced road on top, Paul W. Sykes, Jr. The Space Coast Birding and Wildlife Festival make up the wetland part of the facility (Fig- USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center was held at Titusville, Brevard County, ures 1 and 2). The impoundments comprise a Florida on 13–17 November 2002. During total of 57 hectares (140 acres), are kept Warnell School of Forest Resources the birding competition on the last day of the flooded much of the time, and present an festival, the Canadian Team reported seeing open expanse of shallow water in an other- The University of Georgia several distant swallows at Brevard County’s wise xeric landscape. Patches of emergent South Central Regional Wastewater Treat- freshwater vegetation form mosaics across Athens, Georgia 30602-2152 ment Facility known as Viera Wetlands. open water within each impoundment and in They thought these were either Cliff the shallows along the dikes. A few trees and (email: [email protected]) (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) or Cave (P. fulva) aquatic shrubs are scattered across these wet- Swallows. lands. Following his participation at the festival, At about 0830 EST on the 18th, Gardler Gardler looked for the swallows on 18 stopped on the southmost dike of Cell 1 Lyn S. Atherton November. The man-made Viera Wetlands (Figure 2) to observe swallows foraging low are well known for waders, waterfowl, rap- over the water and flying into the strong 1100 Pinellas Bayway, I-3 tors, shorebirds, and open-country passer- north-to-northwest wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Field Ornithologists the Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly
    Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists The Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly VOL. 36, NO. 1 Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists January 2002 Vol. 36, No. 1 Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists January 2002 TABLE OF C ONTENTS A LETTER FROM THE E DITOR..............................................................................................2 2002 CONVENTION IN DURANGO WITH KENN KAUFMANN...................................................3 CFO BOARD MEETING MINUTES: 1 DECEMBER 2001........................................................4 TREE-NESTING HABITAT OF PURPLE MARTINS IN COLORADO.................................................6 Richard T. Reynolds, David P. Kane, and Deborah M. Finch OLIN SEWALL PETTINGILL, JR.: AN APPRECIATION...........................................................14 Paul Baicich MAMMALS IN GREAT HORNED OWL PELLETS FROM BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO............16 Rebecca E. Marvil and Alexander Cruz UPCOMING CFO FIELD TRIPS.........................................................................................23 THE SHRIKES OF DEARING ROAD, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO 1993-2001....................24 Susan H. Craig RING-BILLED GULLS FEEDING ON RUSSIAN-OLIVE FRUIT...................................................32 Nicholas Komar NEWS FROM THE C OLORADO BIRD R ECORDS COMMITTEE (JANUARY 2002).........................35 Tony Leukering NEWS FROM THE FIELD: THE SUMMER 2001 REPORT (JUNE - JULY)...................................36 Christopher L. Wood and Lawrence S. Semo COLORADO F IELD O
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs of Reproduction in Tree Swallows (Tachycineta Bicolor)L
    2540 The costs of reproduction in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)l NATHANIEL T. WHEELWRIGHT; JOANNA LEARY, AND CARAGH FITZGERALD Department of Biology, Bowdoin CIJ/lege,Brunswick. ME 04011, U.S.A. Received June 20, 1990 WHEELWRIGHT,N. T., LEARY, J., and FITZGERALD,C. 1991. The costs of reproduction in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Can. J. Zool. 69: 2540-2547. We investigated the effect of brood size on nestling growth and survival, parental survival, and future fecundity in tree swallows (Tach)cineta bicolor) over a 4-year period (1987 -1990) in an effort to understand whether reproductive trade-offs limit clutch size in birds. In addition to examining naturally varying brood sizes in a population on Kent Island, New Brunswick, Canada, we experimentally modified brood sizes, increasing or decreasing the reproductive burdens of females by two offspring. Unlike previous studies, broods of the same females were enlarged or reduced in up to 3 successive years in a search for evidence of cumulative costs of reproduction that might go undetected by a single brood manipulation. Neither observation nor experiment supported the existence of a trade-off between offspring quality and quantity, in contrast with the predictions of life-history theory. Nestling wing length, mass, and tarsus length were unrelated to brood size. Although differences between means were in the direction predicted, few differences were statistically significant, despite large sample sizes.~estlings from small broods were no more likely to return as breeding adults than nestlings from large broods, but return rates of both groups were very low. Parental return rates were also independent of brood size, and there was no evidence of a negati ve effect of brood size on future fecundity (laying date, clutch size).
    [Show full text]
  • Biolphilately Vol-62 No-4
    100 Biophilately June 2014 Vol. 63 (2) ORNITHOLOGY Editor Glenn G. Mertz, BU1455 New Issues As I prepared to write this article for April, May, and June 2014, /LQQ¶V6WDPS1HZV laid a bomb on their readers ZLWKWKHQRWLILFDWLRQWKDWWKH\KDYHHOLPLQDWHGWKH³1HZ,VVXHV´VHFWLRQLQWKHLUZHHNO\SXEOLFDWLRQ What this means is that collectors and dealers will not be alerted as to what issues are in the pipeline from the some 180+ countries of the globe by their postal authorities. This also means that, by no longer listing this information that was part of my listing, details such as designer, printing method, or printing entity will no longer appear as part of the stamp listing thDW,SURYLGHIRUHDFKLVVXH,VWLOOKDYHVRPHRIWKHVHDUWLFOHVIURPSULRU/LQQ¶VOLVWLQJVIRU issues I have not yet reported, but eventually I will no longer be able to provide this information. Another concern is not knowing when a bird stamp is part of a mixed stamp issue, because Scott Publishing Company does not always list a description of every stamp in a mixed stamp issue as to the subject matter. I have UHDGDQGVHHQDQXPEHURIOHWWHUVWR/LQQ¶VE\VXEVFULEHUVUHJDUGLQJWKHHOLPLQDWLRQRIWKH³1HZ,VVXHV´VHFWLRQ /LQQ¶VVWDWHGUHDVRQIRUHOLPLQDWLRQRQSDJHRIWKH)HEUXDU\ZHHNO\LVVXHLVWKHWLPHLWWRRNWRJHWWKHVH listings and that it furthermore was a duplication of the content in the once-a-PRQWK³6FRWW1HZ,VVXH8SGDWH´ listing in the /LQQ¶V6WDPS1HZV. It appears that /LQQ¶V6WDPS1HZV is not aware of how far the new issue updates are behind in listing some countries. A few are six or more years behind and other are about one year. The losers in this decision are the stamp collecting community and maybe the dealers. And they wonder why stamp collecting is waning as a hobby.
    [Show full text]
  • TREE SWALLOW Tachycineta Bicolor Tree Swallows Are the Only Swallows to Be Seen All Year in the Sacramento Region
    TREE SWALLOW Tachycineta bicolor Tree swallows are the only swallows to be seen all year in the Sacramento region. A few winter here; others come to join them early in the spring. They are about sparrow-length but slimmer. The male is steel blue on top, white underneath. Tree swallows like wooded areas near streams. They can be seen skimming close to the water scooping up insects. Usually a hole in a tree trunk is chosen for a nest and lined with grass, leaves and feathers. The violet green swallow, a bird with similar colors but with white around the sides of the rump, is found here in warm weather. CLIFF SWALLOW Petrochelidon pyrrhonota Cliff swallows, famous for their annual return to San Juan Capistrano, likewise return to the Sacramento region within a few days of the same date each year. Wherever a bridge or culvert houses a colony of these swallows, the same kind of homecoming takes place each spring. Cliff swallows are identified by their buff foreheads, orange rumps, and square tails. They fly with long sweeping glides and steep climbs, catching flying insects on the wing. The bulb-shaped nests, hung under bridges, highway overpasses and eaves of buildings, are built entirely of mud. Flocks of cliff swallows can be seen around puddles gathering mud in their bills. When disturbed by an intruder or when flying over feeding grounds, the birds utter a squeaky, guttural sound. BARN SWALLOW Hirundo rustica Here is a bird with a real “swallow tail” outfit. In fact, it is our only swallow with a deeply forked tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Swallow Taehyeineta Hie%R
    Tree Swallow Taehyeineta hie%r Tree Swallows are among the most familiar Vermont birds. Their breeding habitat is usually, but not always, located near water; it includes farmland, wet meadows, marshes, and brooks, as well as villages near mead­ ows, streams, or ponds. Nests are often placed in dead snags that project above the water of a lake or pond. The Tree Swallow's affinity for water habitats is related to the abundant insect life in such areas. The other major requirement for nesting habitat is the presence of cavities suitable for nest sites­ primarily natural cavities, old woodpecker predators by circling over and diving at in­ holes, and nesting boxes. Although highly truders while uttering a sharp, clicking call territorial at the nest site, Tree Swallows (Stokes 1979). The nest, built by the female, sometimes nest in close proximity if suitable is a collection of dry grasses or pine needles nest boxes or trees with old woodpecker lined with feathers, 90% of which are white. holes are present. Single pairs will some­ Tree Swallows are sometimes observed fly­ times take up residence at remote beaver ing low over a domestic duck and plucking ponds. a feather from its back (M. Metcalf, pers. Swallows are active birds and are found observ.). Several pairs nesting near each in open habitats where observation is not other may compete for feathers. Nest build­ difficult. The Tree Swallow, widely distrib­ ing may take as long as a month, but average uted in Vermont, was found in 178 of the construction time is 2 to 3 weeks (Stokes 179 Atlas Project priority blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • NCUE 2008 Text Pgs 1-144 11.4.08.Indd
    CORPORATE SPONSORS To be a corporate sponsor of the National Conference on Urban Entomology is to be a benefactor of programs supported by the conference, a supporter of current entomological activities in the areas of urban entomology, and a partner in promoting a better understanding of the science of urban entomology. The following are the National Conference on Urban Entomology corporate sponsors for 2008 (in alphabetical order): BASF Corporation Bayer Environmental Science Dow AgroSciences DuPont Professional Products MGK-McLaughlin Gormley King Company Orkin, Inc. Pest Control Technology Magazine Pest Management Professional Magazine S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. Terminix International Whitmire Micro-Gen THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT! Proceedings cover was adapted from Tim Cabrera’s design for the 2008 National Conference on Urban Entomology Program cover, which refl ected the theme “Urban Pest Roundup.” PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON URBAN ENTOMOLOGY Edited by Susan C. Jones ACKNOWLEDGMENTS David J. Shetlar (Ohio State University) generously provided expertise with graphics and print formatting; his assistance was invaluable. I would like to thank Megan E. Meuti, Lauren N. Tryon, and El-Desouky Ammar (Ohio State University) for help inputting and formatting text and proofreading the manuscript. Karen M. Vail (University of Tennessee), Dini M. Miller (Virginia Tech), and Laura Nelson (Texas A&M University) also are thanked for their assistance with various aspects of the Proceedings. Tim Cabrera is gratefully acknowledged for designing the 2008 National Conference on Urban Entomology Program cover. TABLE OF CONTENTS National Conference On Urban Entomology May 18-21, 2008 Tulsa, Oklahoma U.S.A.
    [Show full text]