Parietal Cortex Matters in Alzheimer's Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parietal Cortex Matters in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36 (2012) 297–309 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neubiorev Review Parietal cortex matters in Alzheimer’s disease: An overview of structural, functional and metabolic findings a,b,∗ a,b a,b,c a,b a,b,d Heidi I.L. Jacobs , Martin P.J. Van Boxtel , Jelle Jolles , Frans R.J. Verhey , Harry B.M. Uylings a School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands b European Graduate School of Neuroscience EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands c AZIRE Research Institute, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands d Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Atrophy of the medial temporal lobe, especially the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus, is Received 15 March 2011 considered to be the most predictive structural brain biomarker for Alzheimer’s Dementia (AD). However, Received in revised form 15 June 2011 recent neuroimaging studies reported a possible mismatch between structural and metabolic findings, Accepted 21 June 2011 showing medial temporal lobe atrophy and medial parietal hypoperfusion as biomarkers for AD. The role of the parietal lobe in the development of AD is only recently beginning to attract attention. The current Keywords: review discusses parietal lobe involvement in the early stages of AD, viz. mild cognitive impairment, Posterior parietal cortex as reported from structural, functional, perfusion and metabolic neuroimaging studies. The medial and Mild cognitive impairment posterior parts of the parietal lobe seem to be preferentially affected, compared to the other parietal lobe Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging parts. On the basis of the reviewed literature we propose a model showing the relationship between the Disconnection various pathological events, as measured by different neuroimaging techniques, in the development of AD. In this model myelin breakdown is a beginning of the chain of pathological events leading to AD pathology and an AD diagnosis. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction . 298 2. Methods . 298 2.1. Search strategy and selection criteria . 298 2.2. Data analysis . 298 3. Structure of this review . 298 4. Parietal lobe structure and function . 299 4.1. Parietal lobe structure . 299 4.2. Parietal lobe functions . 299 4.3. Relevance of the parietal lobe to neuropsychological deficits in AD . 300 5. Involvement of the parietal lobe during conversion from MCI to AD in neuroimaging studies . 300 5.1. Structural neuroimaging . 300 5.1.1. Grey matter studies . 300 5.1.2. White matter studies . 300 5.2. Functional neuroimaging . 301 5.2.1. Resting state activity studies . 301 5.2.2. Task-related activity studies . 301 5.3. Metabolic neuroimaging . 301 5.4. Multimodal neuroimaging: MRI and PET . 302 ∗ Corresponding author at: School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 43 388 41 26; fax: +31 43 388 40 92. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (H.I.L. Jacobs), [email protected] (M.P.J. Van Boxtel), [email protected] (J. Jolles), [email protected] (F.R.J. Verhey), [email protected] (H.B.M. Uylings). 0149-7634/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.06.009 298 H.I.L. Jacobs et al. / Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36 (2012) 297–309 6. Discussion . 302 6.1. Involvement of the parietal lobe in various neuroimaging studies in early AD . 302 6.2. Investigating the parietal lobe as a next step in early AD detection . 303 6.3. Future research directions . 304 6.4. Conclusion . 305 Funding . 305 Appendix A. Supplementary data . 305 References . 305 1. Introduction changes (Jagust et al., 2002; Villain et al., 2010b; Zhang et al., 2011). Thus, there might be a mismatch between structural and metabolic findings (Buckner et al., 2005; Caroli et al., 2010; Hunt et al., 2007; Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, Ishii et al., 2005; Klunk et al., 2004; Matsuda, 2007; Villain et al., is characterized by an insidious decline in memory, later affecting 2010b). Understanding this mismatch requires a better compre- language, visuospatial perception, arithmetic abilities and execu- hension of the relevance of the posterior association areas and their tive functioning. Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms have also connectivity with the rest of the brain. been frequently reported (Cummings, 2004). AD is characterized by This overview summarizes the evidence of structural, functional both the accumulation.
Recommended publications
  • Cerebral Cortex Structure, Function, Dysfunction Reading Ch 10 Waxman Dental Neuroanatomy Lecture Suzanne Stensaas, Ph.D
    Cerebral Cortex Structure, Function, Dysfunction Reading Ch 10 Waxman Dental Neuroanatomy Lecture Suzanne Stensaas, Ph.D. March 15, 2011 Anatomy Review • Lobes and layers • Brodmann’s areas • Vascular Supply • Major Neurological Findings – Frontal, Parietal, Temporal, Occipital, Limbic • Quiz Questions? Types of Cortex • Sensory • Motor • Unimodal association • Multimodal association necessary for language, reason, plan, imagine, create Structure of neocortex (6 layers) The general pattern of primary, association and mulimodal association cortex (Mesulam) Brodmann, Lateral Left Hemisphere MCA left hemisphere from D.Haines ACA and PCA -Haines Issues of Functional Localization • Earliest studies -Signs, symptoms and note location • Electrical discharge (epilepsy) suggested function • Ablation - deficit suggest function • Reappearance of infant functions suggest loss of inhibition (disinhibition), i.e. grasp, suck, Babinski • Variabilities in case reports • Linked networks of afferent and efferent neurons in several regions working to accomplish a task • Functional imaging does not always equate with abnormal function associated with location of lesion • fMRI activation of several cortical regions • Same sign from lesions in different areas – i.e.paraphasias • Notion of the right hemisphere as "emotional" in contrast to the left one as "logical" has no basis in fact. Limbic System (not a true lobe) involves with cingulate gyrus and the • Hippocampus- short term memory • Amygdala- fear, agression, mating • Fornix pathway to hypothalamus •
    [Show full text]
  • Lateralization of Function Human Brain
    Lateralization of Function Dr. Coulson Cognitive Science Department UCSD Human Brain • An extension of the spinal cord 1 Cerebral Hemispheres Corpus Callosum 2 Cartoon View of Brain Cerebral Lobes 3 Neurons • Brain composed of neurons – 100 billion • Neurons both send and receive signals to other cells in form of pulses • Important parts – Cell body –Axon – Synapse Connectivity • Each neuron connected to 10,000 other neurons • Point of contact is the synapse • Computing power of brain comes from connections 4 Cortex • Two millimeters thick and has area of 1.5 square meters Cartoon View: Frontal Lobe • In front of central sulcus • Decisions, judgments, emotions 5 Cartoon View: Parietal Lobe • Behind central sulcus • Perception of stimuli related to touch, pressure, temperature, pain Cartoon View: Temporal Lobe • Below lateral fissure • Perception, recognition, auditory processing 6 Cartoon View: Occipital Lobe • Located at back of brain, behind the parietal lobe and temporal lobe • Vision Lateralization of Function • One side of the brain is more crucial for a given function and/or more efficient at the underlying computational tasks • Typically a matter of degree – Strongly vs. Weakly Lateralized • Motor control a good example of a lateralized function 7 Sensorimotor Cortex 8 Motor Control What about language? • Language is a paradigmatic example of a lateralized cognitive phenomenon 9 Wada Test Lateralization of Function • Most evidence of lateralized brain function comes from observing how brain damage affects behavior on various sorts
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Mechanisms of Navigation Involving Interactions of Cortical and Subcortical Structures
    J Neurophysiol 119: 2007–2029, 2018. First published February 14, 2018; doi:10.1152/jn.00498.2017. REVIEW Where Are You Going? The Neurobiology of Navigation Neural mechanisms of navigation involving interactions of cortical and subcortical structures James R. Hinman, Holger Dannenberg, Andrew S. Alexander, and Michael E. Hasselmo Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts Submitted 5 July 2017; accepted in final form 1 February 2018 Hinman JR, Dannenberg H, Alexander AS, Hasselmo ME. Neural mecha- nisms of navigation involving interactions of cortical and subcortical structures. J Neurophysiol 119: 2007–2029, 2018. First published February 14, 2018; doi: 10.1152/jn.00498.2017.—Animals must perform spatial navigation for a range of different behaviors, including selection of trajectories toward goal locations and foraging for food sources. To serve this function, a number of different brain regions play a role in coding different dimensions of sensory input important for spatial behavior, including the entorhinal cortex, the retrosplenial cortex, the hippocampus, and the medial septum. This article will review data concerning the coding of the spatial aspects of animal behavior, including location of the animal within an environment, the speed of movement, the trajectory of movement, the direction of the head in the environment, and the position of barriers and objects both relative to the animal’s head direction (egocentric) and relative to the layout of the environment (allocentric). The mechanisms for coding these important spatial representations are not yet fully understood but could involve mechanisms including integration of self-motion information or coding of location based on the angle of sensory features in the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Temporal Lobe
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Epilepsy Research and Treatment Volume 2012, Article ID 176157, 12 pages doi:10.1155/2012/176157 Review Article AnatomyoftheTemporalLobe J. A. Kiernan Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1 Correspondence should be addressed to J. A. Kiernan, [email protected] Received 6 October 2011; Accepted 3 December 2011 Academic Editor: Seyed M. Mirsattari Copyright © 2012 J. A. Kiernan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Only primates have temporal lobes, which are largest in man, accommodating 17% of the cerebral cortex and including areas with auditory, olfactory, vestibular, visual and linguistic functions. The hippocampal formation, on the medial side of the lobe, includes the parahippocampal gyrus, subiculum, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, and associated white matter, notably the fimbria, whose fibres continue into the fornix. The hippocampus is an inrolled gyrus that bulges into the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle. Association fibres connect all parts of the cerebral cortex with the parahippocampal gyrus and subiculum, which in turn project to the dentate gyrus. The largest efferent projection of the subiculum and hippocampus is through the fornix to the hypothalamus. The choroid fissure, alongside the fimbria, separates the temporal lobe from the optic tract, hypothalamus and midbrain. The amygdala comprises several nuclei on the medial aspect of the temporal lobe, mostly anterior the hippocampus and indenting the tip of the temporal horn. The amygdala receives input from the olfactory bulb and from association cortex for other modalities of sensation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neurobiology of Agrammatic Sentence Comprehension: a Lesion Study
    The Neurobiology of Agrammatic Sentence Comprehension: A Lesion Study Corianne Rogalsky1, Arianna N. LaCroix1, Kuan-Hua Chen2,3, Steven W. Anderson2, Hanna Damasio4, Tracy Love5, and Gregory Hickok6 Abstract ■ Broca’s area has long been implicated in sentence compre- average did not exhibit the expected agrammatic compre- hension. Damage to this region is thought to be the central hension pattern—for example, their performance was >80% source of “agrammatic comprehension” in which performance on noncanonical sentences in the sentence–picture matching is substantially worse (and near chance) on sentences with non- task. Patients with ATL damage (n = 18) also did not exhibit canonical word orders compared with canonical word order an agrammatic comprehension pattern. Across our entire sentences (in English). This claim is supported by functional patient sample, the lesions of patients with agrammatic com- neuroimaging studies demonstrating greater activation in prehension patterns in either task had maximal overlap in pos- Broca’s area for noncanonical versus canonical sentences. terior superior temporal and inferior parietal regions. Using However, functional neuroimaging studies also have frequently voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping, we find that lower per- implicated the anterior temporal lobe (ATL) in sentence pro- formances on canonical and noncanonical sentences in each cessing more broadly, and recent lesion–symptom mapping task are both associated with damage to a large left superior studies have implicated the ATL and mid temporal regions in temporal–inferior parietal network including portions of the agrammatic comprehension. This study investigates these ATL, but not Broca’s area. Notably, however, response bias in seemingly conflicting findings in 66 left-hemisphere patients plausibility judgments was significantly associated with damage with chronic focal cerebral damage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Role for the Left Angular Gyrus in Episodic Simulation and Memory
    8142 • The Journal of Neuroscience, August 23, 2017 • 37(34):8142–8149 Behavioral/Cognitive A Role for the Left Angular Gyrus in Episodic Simulation and Memory X Preston P. Thakral, XKevin P. Madore, and XDaniel L. Schacter Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02138 Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies indicate that episodic simulation (i.e., imagining specific future experiences) and episodic memory (i.e., remembering specific past experiences) are associated with enhanced activity in a common set of neural regions referred to as the core network. This network comprises the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and left angular gyrus, among other regions. Because fMRI data are correlational, it is unknown whether activity increases in core network regions are critical for episodic simulation and episodic memory. In the current study, we used MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whether temporary disruption of the left angular gyrus would impair both episodic simulation and memory (16 participants, 10 females). Relative to TMS to a control site (vertex), disruption of the left angular gyrus significantly reduced the number of internal (i.e., episodic) details produced during the simulation and memory tasks, with a concomitant increase in external detail production (i.e., semantic, repetitive, or off-topic information), reflected by a significant detail by TMS site interaction. Difficulty in the simulation and memory tasks also increased after TMS to the left angular gyrus relative to the vertex. In contrast, performance in a nonepisodic control task did not differ statistically as a function of TMS site (i.e., number of free associates produced or difficulty in performing the free associate task).
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans Ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai
    Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai To cite this version: Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai. Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, Frontiers, 2018, 12, pp.93. 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093. hal-01929541 HAL Id: hal-01929541 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01929541 Submitted on 21 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. REVIEW published: 19 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans J. ten Donkelaar 1*†, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer 2† and Jürgen K. Mai 3† 1 Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2 IMN Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives UMR 5293, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3 Institute for Anatomy, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany The gyri and sulci of the human brain were defined by pioneers such as Louis-Pierre Gratiolet and Alexander Ecker, and extensified by, among others, Dejerine (1895) and von Economo and Koskinas (1925).
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Connectivity of the Angular Gyrus in Normal Reading and Dyslexia (Positron-Emission Tomography͞human͞brain͞regional͞cerebral)
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 8939–8944, July 1998 Neurobiology Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia (positron-emission tomographyyhumanybrainyregionalycerebral) B. HORWITZ*†,J.M.RUMSEY‡, AND B. C. DONOHUE‡ *Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, and ‡Child Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 Communicated by Robert H. Wurtz, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, May 14, 1998 (received for review January 19, 1998) ABSTRACT The classic neurologic model for reading, not functionally connected during a specific task. On the other based on studies of patients with acquired alexia, hypothesizes hand, if rCBF in two regions is correlated, these regions need functional linkages between the angular gyrus in the left not be anatomically linked; their activities may be correlated, hemisphere and visual association areas in the occipital and for example, because both receive inputs from a third area (for temporal lobes. The angular gyrus also is thought to have more discussion about these connectivity concepts, see refs. 8, functional links with posterior language areas (e.g., Wer- 10, and 11). nicke’s area), because it is presumed to be involved in mapping Based on lesion studies in many patients with alexia, it has visually presented inputs onto linguistic representations. Us- been proposed that the posterior portion of the neural network ing positron emission tomography , we demonstrate in normal mediating reading in the left cerebral hemisphere involves men that regional cerebral blood flow in the left angular gyrus functional links between the angular gyrus and extrastriate shows strong within-task, across-subjects correlations (i.e., areas in occipital and temporal cortex associated with the functional connectivity) with regional cerebral blood flow in visual processing of letter and word-like stimuli (12–14).
    [Show full text]
  • Reversible Verbal and Visual Memory Deficits After Left Retrosplenial Infarction
    Journal of Clinical Neurology / Volume 3 / March, 2007 Case Report Reversible Verbal and Visual Memory Deficits after Left Retrosplenial Infarction Jong Hun Kim, M.D.*, Kwang-Yeol Park, M.D.†, Sang Won Seo, M.D.*, Duk L. Na, M.D.*, Chin-Sang Chung, M.D.*, Kwang Ho Lee, M.D.*, Gyeong-Moon Kim, M.D.* *Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea †Department of Neurology, Chung-Ang University Medical Center, Chung-Ang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea The retrosplenial cortex is a cytoarchitecturally distinct brain structure located in the posterior cingulate gyrus and bordering the splenium, precuneus, and calcarine fissure. Functional imaging suggests that the retrosplenium is involved in memory, visuospatial processing, proprioception, and emotion. We report on a patient who developed reversible verbal and visual memory deficits following a stroke. Neuro- psychological testing revealed both anterograde and retrograde memory deficits in verbal and visual modalities. Brain diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an acute infarction of the left retrosplenium. J Clin Neurol 3(1):62-66, 2007 Key Words : Retrosplenium, Memory, Amnesia We report on a patient who developed both verbal INTRODUCTION and visual memory deficits after an acute infarction of the retrosplenial cortex. The main structures related to human memory are the Papez circuit, the basolateral limbic circuit, and the basal forebrain, which communicate with each other through white-matter tracts. Damage to these structures (in- cluding the communication tracts) from hemorrhages, infarctions, and tumors can result in memory dis- turbances.1,2 In addition to these structures, Valenstein et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing the Cortical Conductor's Tempo: Neuromodulation of the Claustrum
    REVIEW published: 13 May 2021 doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.658228 Changing the Cortical Conductor’s Tempo: Neuromodulation of the Claustrum Kelly L. L. Wong 1, Aditya Nair 2,3 and George J. Augustine 1,2* 1Neuroscience and Mental Health Program, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore, 2Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore, Singapore, 3Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States The claustrum is a thin sheet of neurons that is densely connected to many cortical regions and has been implicated in numerous high-order brain functions. Such brain functions arise from brain states that are influenced by neuromodulatory pathways from the cholinergic basal forebrain, dopaminergic substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area, and serotonergic raphe. Recent revelations that the claustrum receives dense input from these structures have inspired investigation of state-dependent control of the claustrum. Here, we review neuromodulation in the claustrum—from anatomical connectivity to behavioral manipulations—to inform future analyses of claustral function. Keywords: claustrum, acetylcholine, serotonin, dopamine, neuromodulation Edited by: Edouard Pearlstein, INTRODUCTION Independent Researcher, Marseille, France The claustrum is a long and irregular sheet of neurons nestled between the insula and striatum. As it is known to be heavily and bilaterally connected to many brain regions in organisms ranging Reviewed by: Ami Citri, from mice to humans (Sherk, 1986; Torgerson et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017, 2019; Zingg et al., Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2018), the claustrum has been likened to a cortical conductor (Crick and Koch, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Retrosplenial Cortex Is Necessary for Latent Learning in Mice
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.21.453258; this version posted July 23, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Retrosplenial cortex is necessary for spatial and non-spatial latent learning in mice Ana Carolina Bottura de Barros1,2*, Liad J. Baruchin1#, Marios C. Panayi3#, Nils Nyberg1, Veronika Samborska1, Mitchell T. Mealing1, Thomas Akam3, Jeehyun Kwag4, David M. Bannerman3 & Michael M. Kohl1,2* 1 Dept. of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK 2 Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK 3 Dept. of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK 4 Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 136-71, Republic of Korea #These authors contributed equally *Correspondence: [email protected] & [email protected] Keywords: Latent Learning, Retrosplenial Cortex, Optogenetics, Internal Model, Mice 1/19 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.21.453258; this version posted July 23, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Abstract 2 Latent learning occurs when associations are formed between stimuli in the absence of explicit 3 reinforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Brain Hemisphere Controls the Left Side of the Body and the Left What Makes the Human Brain Unique Is Its Size
    About the brain Cerebrum (also known as the The brain is made up of around 100 billion nerve cells - each one cerebral cortex or forebrain) is connected to another 10,000. This means that, in total, we The cerebrum is the largest part of the brain. It is split in to two have around 1,000 trillion connections in our brains. (This would ‘halves’ of roughly equal size called hemispheres. The two be written as 1,000,000,000,000,000). These are ultimately hemispheres, the left and right, are joined together by a bundle responsible for who we are. Our brains control the decisions we of nerve fibres called the corpus callosum. The right make, the way we learn, move, and how we feel. The human brain hemisphere controls the left side of the body and the left What makes the human brain unique is its size. Our brains have a hemisphere controls the right side of the body. The cerebrum is larger cerebral cortex, or cerebrum, relative to the rest of the The human brain is the centre of our nervous further divided in to four lobes: frontal, parietal, occipital, and brain than any other animal. (See the Cerebrum section of this temporal, which have different functions. system. It is the most complex organ in our fact sheet for further information.) This enables us to have abilities The frontal lobe body and is responsible for everything we do - such as complex language, problem-solving and self-control. The frontal lobe is located at the front of the brain.
    [Show full text]