DOCSLIB.ORG

Dinoflagellate Nucleus Contains an Extensive Endomembrane Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dinoflagellate Nucleus Contains an Extensive Endomembrane Network www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Dinofagellate nucleus contains an extensive endomembrane network, the nuclear net Received: 20 April 2018 Gregory S. Gavelis1,2,3, Maria Herranz2,3, Kevin C. Wakeman4, Christina Ripken5, Accepted: 28 November 2018 Satoshi Mitarai6, Gillian H. Gile 1, Patrick J. Keeling2 & Brian S. Leander1,2 Published: xx xx xxxx Dinofagellates are some of the most common eukaryotic cells in the ocean, but have very unusual nuclei. Many exhibit a form of closed mitosis (dinomitosis) wherein the nuclear envelope (NE) invaginates to form one or more trans-nuclear tunnels. Rather than contact spindles directly, the chromatids then bind to membrane-based kinetochores on the NE. To better understand these unique mitotic features, we reconstructed the nuclear architecture of Polykrikos kofoidii in 3D using focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) in conjunction with high-pressure freezing, freeze- substitution, TEM, and confocal microscopy. We found that P. kofoidii possessed six nuclear tunnels, which were continuous with a reticulating network of membranes that has thus far gone unnoticed. These membranous extensions interconnect the six tunnels while ramifying throughout the nucleus to form a “nuclear net.” To our knowledge, the nuclear net is the most elaborate endomembrane structure described within a nucleus. Our fndings demonstrate the utility of tomographic approaches for detecting 3D membrane networks and show that nuclear complexity has been underestimated in Polykrikos kofoidii and, potentially, in other dinofagellates. Dinofagellate nuclei (dinokarya) have long fascinated cell biologists because of their bizarre features. Tey con- tain some of the largest eukaryotic genomes, housed in dozens to hundreds of chromosomes that remain per- manently condensed throughout the cell cycle1,2. Te chromosomes are characteristically dense, some existing in a “liquid crystalline state,” while all seem to lack nucleosomes3–5. Phylogenomic reconstructions,6,7 and recent experimental work8, suggest that nucleosomes were lost in the common ancestor of all dinofagellates and that their DNA packing role was taken over by nucleoproteins acquired from a virus. Dinofagellate genome archi- tecture is highly unusual, with genes arranged unidirectionally, ofen as tandem repeats, and the vast majority of genomic DNA is noncoding9–11. Te sparse coding regions probably occupy “loops” of DNA at the chromo- some periphery, which are organized by histone-like proteins of bacterial origin12–14. In the past decade, new approaches have illuminated the unusual arrangement of proteins and DNA within dinofagellate chromosomes, as well as their coordination throughout the cell cycle15–17. However, much less attention has been paid to the membranes that surround them (i.e., the nuclear envelope). Te nuclear envelope (NE) and the endoplasmic reticulum—which are continuous—together constitute the most conserved organelle(s) in eukaryotic history, given that even mitochondria, the Golgi apparatus, and fa- gella have been abandoned in certain eukaryotic lineages18–20. Besides acting as a gatekeeper to the nucleus, the dinofagellate NE takes on an unusual conformation during mitosis, called “dinomitosis” in core dinofagellates (i.e., dinofagellates other than Oxyrrhis and syndinians). By defnition, dinomitosis is a form of closed mitosis, since the NE never breaks down. Instead, it pinches inward at each nuclear pole to form a “tunnel” through the nucleus; essentially turning the nucleus into a toroidal shape resembling a doughnut. By traversing the tunnel, cytoplasmic spindles are able to cross the dinokaryon without ever entering the nucleoplasm. Tis stands in con- trast to most organisms with closed mitosis, which use either intra-nuclear or NE-spanning spindles to separate 1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4501, USA. 2Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T-1Z4, Canada. 3Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T-1Z4, Canada. 4Department of Biological Sciences: Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0810, Japan. 5Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate University, Kunigami-gun, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan. 6Marine Biophysics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Kunigami- gun, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.S.G. (email: [email protected]) SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | (2019) 9:839 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37065-w 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 1. Cellular features of Polykrikos kofoidii. (A) Diferential interference contrast (DIC) light micrograph of a P. kofoidii pseudocolony, which is defned by the presence of two nuclei (Nu) and nematocysts (N). (B) Maximum intensity projection of several FIB-SEM sections showing a nematocyst (N), a taeniocyst (T) and the side of a nucleus (Nu). (C) FIB-SEM surface reconstruction of several chromosomes. Scale bar A = 30 µm, B = 10 µm, C = 2 µm. the chromatids21–23. Uniquely, dinomitotic chromatids never directly contact the spindles; instead they attach to membrane-bound kinetochores on the inner NE membrane. Te chromatids then migrate to opposite ends of the membranous tunnel24. Once segregation is complete, the nucleus divides and the tunnel pinches apart in the mid- dle, returning each daughter nucleus to a spherical shape25–27. Where studied, early-branching dinomitotic lineages have a single tunnel (e.g., Noctiluca scintillans, Syndinium sp., and Haplozoon—if it is early branching), while core dinofagellates diverging afer N. scintillans (e.g. Amphidinium carterae, Prorocentrum minium, Heterocapsa sp., and Crypthecodinium cohnii) have multiple tunnels in parallel—with a maximum of five, as described in C. cohnii28. Tus, like the evolution of dinofagellate chromosomes, mitosis has become increasingly unusual and elaborate in some dinofagellates29. Te details of dinomitosis deserve deeper investigation, given that dinofag- ellate cell cycles proceed at a curiously slow pace compared to other algae30, which has important ecological con- sequences in the marine plankton, where dinofagellates are among the most common algae and consumers31,32. Here, we investigated the complexity of nuclear membranes in Polykrikos kofoidii, a large, predatory dinofag- ellate. While most dinomitotic studies have focused on cells with modestly sized nuclei33–36 (e.g., Crypthecodinium cohnii, in which nuclei are ~10 µm wide and contain 99 to 110 chromosomes), P. kofoidii is an interesting subject because its nuclei are giant—at ~40 µm in diameter—and each contains hundreds of chromosomes. Moreover, P. kofoidii is “pseudocolonial” with eight fagella and two nuclei per cell (Fig. 1A), compared to the typical comple- ment of two fagella and one nucleus per dinofagellate cell37. Polykrikoids are ecologically important as voracious predators of harmful algal blooms, which they capture using elaborate secretory organelles (Fig. 1B)38–40, and can consume multiple cells of chain-forming prey at a time, in part facilitated by the large size of their pseudocol- onies41,42. Te nuclei in P. kofoidii are correspondingly giant, and each is tethered to the nearest pair of fagellar basal bodies by fbrous ribbons. Previous studies have shown its NE to possess bubble-like convexities (“nuclear chambers”) and multiple tunnels during mitosis43. We investigated dinomitotic membrane architecture in greater depth, by using focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) to digitally reconstruct a giant nucleus from P. kofoidii in 3D, and confrmed our fndings using immuno-fuorescence confocal microscopy and TEM on a dozen additional specimens. Prior to this study, only one dinofagellate nucleus had been modeled in 3D; a mitotic dinokaryon in C. cohnii, which was inferred from serial section transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on a single specimen prepared using stand- ard chemical fxation28. Our study is the frst attempt to reconstruct a dinokaryon from FIB-SEM data, which we used in combination with improved fxation techniques—high-pressure freezing and freeze-substitution—specif- ically chosen to minimize membrane artifacts. In addition to confrming known features of dinofagellate nuclei (e.g., NE tunnels), we also uncovered a novel membranous network, which ramifed throughout the nucleus into a sprawling “nuclear net” that interlinked the six tunnels. Tis web-like, membranous structure represents a new level of complexity for the dinokaryon. Results We frst conducted a TEM investigation on several chemically-fxed mitotic cells of Polykrikos kofoidii and con- frmed previously noted43 features, such as (1) chromosomes that associate with the NE of dinomitotic tunnels (Fig. 2B,C), as well as (2) elaborate infoldings of the plasma membranes that are each called a “pusule” (Figs 2D,E and 3) the presence of “fbrous ribbons” that tether each nucleus to the nearest pair of fagellar basal bodies (Fig. 2G,H). We also confrmed that the nucleus is studded with bubble-like convexities of the NE known as “nuclear chambers” (Fig. 2F). However, we noticed a previously overlooked feature; thin, membranous intercon- nections between the dinomitotic tunnels (Fig. 2C, arrowheads). In order to verify that these were not artifacts SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | (2019) 9:839 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37065-w 2 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 2. Nucleus and associated membranes. (A) FIB-SEM section of a Polykrikos
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parasite of Marine Rotifers: a New Lineage of Dinokaryotic Dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae)
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Marine Biology Volume 2015, Article ID 614609, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/614609 Research Article A Parasite of Marine Rotifers: A New Lineage of Dinokaryotic Dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) Fernando Gómez1 and Alf Skovgaard2 1 Laboratory of Plankton Systems, Oceanographic Institute, University of Sao˜ Paulo, Prac¸a do Oceanografico´ 191, Cidade Universitaria,´ 05508-900 Butanta,˜ SP, Brazil 2Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 7, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark Correspondence should be addressed to Fernando Gomez;´ [email protected] Received 11 July 2015; Accepted 27 August 2015 Academic Editor: Gerardo R. Vasta Copyright © 2015 F. Gomez´ and A. Skovgaard. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Dinoflagellate infections have been reported for different protistan and animal hosts. We report, for the first time, the association between a dinoflagellate parasite and a rotifer host, tentatively Synchaeta sp. (Rotifera), collected from the port of Valencia, NW Mediterranean Sea. The rotifer contained a sporangium with 100–200 thecate dinospores that develop synchronically through palintomic sporogenesis. This undescribed dinoflagellate forms a new and divergent fast-evolved lineage that branches amongthe dinokaryotic dinoflagellates. 1. Introduction form independent lineages with no evident relation to other dinoflagellates [12]. In this study, we describe a new lineage of The alveolates (or Alveolata) are a major lineage of protists an undescribed parasitic dinoflagellate that largely diverged divided into three main phyla: ciliates, apicomplexans, and from other known dinoflagellates.
    [Show full text]
  • Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts from the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor
    h ' '' f MASGC-B-78-001 c. 3 A MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor NATIONAL SEA GRANT DEPOSITORY \ PELL LIBRARY BUILDING URI NA8RAGANSETT BAY CAMPUS % NARRAGANSETT. Rl 02882 Robin M. Overstreet r ii MISSISSIPPI—ALABAMA SEA GRANT CONSORTIUM MASGP—78—021 MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico by Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Sea Grant, under Grant No. 04-7-158-44017 and National Marine Fisheries Service, under PL 88-309, Project No. 2-262-R. TheMississippi-AlabamaSea Grant Consortium furnish ed all of the publication costs. The U.S. Government is authorized to produceand distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. Copyright© 1978by Mississippi-Alabama Sea Gram Consortium and R.M. Overstrect All rights reserved. No pari of this book may be reproduced in any manner without permission from the author. Primed by Blossman Printing, Inc.. Ocean Springs, Mississippi CONTENTS PREFACE 1 INTRODUCTION TO SYMBIOSIS 2 INVERTEBRATES AS HOSTS 5 THE AMERICAN OYSTER 5 Public Health Aspects 6 Dcrmo 7 Other Symbionts and Diseases 8 Shell-Burrowing Symbionts II Fouling Organisms and Predators 13 THE BLUE CRAB 15 Protozoans and Microbes 15 Mclazoans and their I lypeiparasites 18 Misiellaneous Microbes and Protozoans 25 PENAEID
    [Show full text]
  • Infectious Diseases of Laboratory Zebrafish
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF LABORATORY ZEBRAFISH Justin L. Sanders Department of Biomedical Sciences Infectious Diseases – ZIRC Diagnostic Service Summaries 2006-2014 About 7,000 fish and 100 facilities • Pseudoloma : 48% labs, 16% fish • Mycobacteriosis: 40% labs, 6% fish • Edwardsiella ictaluri: 3 labs in 2011. • Pseudocapillaria: 11% labs, 1.3% fish • Gut Hyperplasia/Neoplasia: 12% labs, 2.8% fish • Myxidium: 19% labs, 2.4% fish • Piscinoodinium (max 2 %), Pleistophora (max 7%) Pathogens in Zebrafish Facilities 2006-2015: – ca 10,000 fish, 100 laboratories Parasitic Diseases: general pathology • Space replacement/pressure atrophy • Respiratory impediment – gill parasites • Osmoregulatory – gill & skin infections • Perforation of gut & 2 nd bacterial infections • Inflammatory changes Common parasites of research zebrafish Parasite Group Species Reference Dinoflagellate Piscinoodinium pillulare Westerfield 2000 Ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Matthews 2004 Nematode Pseudocapillaria tomentosa Kent et al. 2002 Myxozoan Myxidium streisingeri Whipps et al. 2015 Digenea Transversotrema patialense Womble et al. 2015 Microsporidia Pseudoloma neurophilia de Kinkelin 1980; Matthews et al. 2001 Pleistophora Sanders et al. 2010 hyphessobryconis Myxidium streisingeri Whipps et al 2015 Myxidium streisingeri Whipps et al 2015 Myxidium streisingeri Whipps et al 2015 Myxidium streisingeri Pathogenesis Mode of Diagnosis Control/Treament transmission Found in lumen Unknown: Wet mount: light Avoidance/quarantine of mesonephric microscopy; and kidney Direct?
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture -7- Pyrrophyta (Dinoflagellates)
    Dr.Ayad M.J. Lecture ‐7‐ Algae 2016 Lecture ‐7‐ Pyrrophyta (Dinoflagellates) 1‐General features A-species, including toxic forms, but toxic forms unknown in freshwater lakes Wide variety of marine. B-Not commonly dominant in lakes but can be important, e.g. under ice in winter and at various times of year in large, oligotrophic lakes. Most are motile. Typically slow growing, some are mixotrophic (bacterivores). C-Habitat: A majority of the dinoflagellates are marine, and they are often abundant in the plankton, but some occur in fresh water. D-Forms: Mostly unicellular, branched filamentous and motile. E-The cell wall has stiff cellulose plates on the outer surface. F-Most of them have two flagella; one lies longitudinally and the other transversely in a furrow between the wall plates. G-Nutrition: Photosynthetic and reserve food is starch and oil. H-Pigments: They appear yellow, green, brown, blue or red depending on the main pigments present in their cells. Most have chlorophylls a and c, in addition to carotenoids. I-Locomotion: Most of have two flagella. The flagella are usually located within grooves, one encircling the body like a belt, and the other perpendicular to it. By beating in their respective grooves, these flagella cause the dinoflagellate to rotate like a top as it moves. 1 Dr.Ayad M.J. Lecture ‐7‐ Algae 2016 J-Flagellates with hard ‘armour’ covering (tends to be inedible – large and spiny) K-Reserve food material: Starch and Fat. L- Reproduction: Sexual reproduction isogamous type (rare). Dinoflagellates are a large group of flagellate protists.
    [Show full text]
  • Oodinium Inlandicum Sp. Nov. (Blastodiniales, Dinophyta), a New Ectoparasitic Dinoflagellate Infecting a Chaetognath, Sagitta Crassa
    Plankton Biol. Ecol. 48 (2): 85-95, 2001 plankton biology & ecology t> The Plnnkton Society of Japan 2001 Oodinium inlandicum sp. nov. (Blastodiniales, Dinophyta), a new ectoparasitic dinoflagellate infecting a chaetognath, Sagitta crassa Takeo Horiguchi1 & Susumu Ohtsuka2 'Division of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-08 JO, Japan ^Fisheries Laboratory, Hiroshima University, 5-8-1 Minato-machi, Takehara, Hiroshima 725-0024, Japan Received 13 February 2001; accepted 26 April 2001 Abstract: A new ectoparasitic dinoflagellate, Oodinium inlandicum Horiguchi et Ohtsuka sp. nov. in festing a neritic chaetognath, Sagitta crassa Tokioka is described from the Seto Inland Sea, western Japan. This is the first record of the genus Oodinium in the western North Pacific. The new species is readily distinguished from other congeners by: (1) host specificity; (2) the shape and location of the nucleus; and (3) the morphology of the peduncle. The present study has revealed that as develop ment proceeds, the nucleus and cytoplasm change markedly. The cytoplasm of the mature trophont consists of a central endoplasm, rich in cytosol and a highly membranous exoplasm. The nucleo- plasm is uniform and lacks electron dense structures, such as chromosomes. In contrast, the young trophont has an elongated dinokaryotic nucleus, which almost completely occupies the anterior half of the cytoplasm. The peduncle penetrates host tissue, but mechanical damage caused by the para site seems not to be extensive. The comparative ultrastructure and ecology of the new parasite are also discussed. Key words: dinoflagellate, Oodinium inlandicum sp. nov., ectoparasite, chaetognath, Sagitta crassa During our survey of parasites of zooplankton in the Seto Introduction Inland Sea, western Japan, the most common neritic A large number of dinoflagellates are known to parasitize chaetognath encountered was Sagitta crassa Tokioka, and it marine vertebrates and invertebrates (e.g., Chatton 1920; was heavily infested by an Oodinium-\ikc dinoflagellate.
    [Show full text]
  • Protozoologica Special Issue: Marine Heterotrophic Protists Guest Editors: John R
    Acta Protozool. (2014) 53: 51–62 http://www.eko.uj.edu.pl/ap ActA doi:10.4467/16890027AP.14.006.1443 Protozoologica Special issue: Marine Heterotrophic Protists Guest editors: John R. Dolan and David J. S. Montagnes Review paper Dirty Tricks in the Plankton: Diversity and Role of Marine Parasitic Protists Alf SKOVGAARD Laboratory of Aquatic Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract. Parasitism is an immensely successful mode of nutrition and parasitic organisms are abundant in most ecosystems. This is also the case for marine planktonic ecosystems in which a large variety of parasitic species are known. Most of these parasites are protists and they infect a wide range of hosts from the marine plankton, ranging from other protists to larger planktonic invertebrates. Parasites often have morphologies and life cycles that are highly specialized as compared to their free-living relatives. However, this does not mean that parasites are necessarily odd or rare phenomena; on the contrary parasites constitute numerically and ecologically important components of the ecosystem. This review gives an overview of the existing knowledge on the diversity and occurrence of parasitic protists in the marine plankton and examines the available information on the potential effects and role of parasitism in this ecosystem. Importance is given to the fact that prevalence and impact of parasitic organisms in marine planktonic systems appear to be overwhelmingly understudied. Key words: Parasite, parasitoid, phytoplankton, plankton, zooplankton. INTRODUCTION food web. For example, phytoplankton cells leak a sub- stantial amount of organic carbon fixed through photo- Early studies on energy transfer between compo- synthesis, by which primary production is exploited by nents of the marine plankton tended to consider the route bacteria rather than by eukaryotic grazers (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on the Housing and Care of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Notes Regarding This Reference Resource
    Guidance on the housing and care of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Notes regarding this Reference Resource: The Council identified four points requiring clarification with this Reference Resource: Environmental Enrichment: The document states on p. 37, “Providing artificial plants or structures that imitate the zebrafish habitat allow animals a choice within their environment. It should be strongly considered - especially for breeding tanks or where fish are kept at low density.” While AAALAC International acknowledges the use of environmental enrichment may be beneficial to the zebrafish, its implementation should take into consideration the scientific goals of the study for which the animals are used. Performance standards should be applied taking into consideration the health, welfare and species-typical behavior. Temperature: The document states on p. 24, “A water temperature of 28.5º C is widely cited as the optimum temperature for breeding zebrafish. There has however, been little research to investigate the full implications of constantly keeping fish at this very specific temperature.” While the document recommends a very specific temperature of 28.5º C as the optimum for breeding zebrafish, it provides a number of references with a range of 25-29º C and acknowledges that more research is needed to determine temperature preference and implication of maintaining fish at warmer temperatures for an extended period of time. Performance standards should be applied with consideration of health, welfare and species-typical behavior. Ice Cold
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Invasive Species and Biodiversity of South Central Alaska
    Marine Invasive Species and Biodiversity of South Central Alaska Anson H. Hines & Gregory M. Ruiz, Editors Smithsonian Environmental Research Center PO Box 28, 647 Contees Wharf Road Edgewater, Maryland 21037-0028 USA Telephone: 443. 482.2208 Fax: 443.482-2295 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Submitted to: Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council of Prince William Sound 3709 Spenard Road Anchorage, AK 99503 USA Telephone: 907.277-7222 Fax: 907.227.4523 154 Fairbanks Drive, PO Box 3089 Valdez, AK 99686 USA Telephone: 907835 Fax: 907.835.5926 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 43655 Kalifornski Beach Road, PO Box 167-0 Soldatna, AK 99661 Telephone: 907.262.9863 Fax: 907.262.7145 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background - Anson Hines & Gregory Ruiz 2. Green Crab (Carcinus maenas) Research – Gregory Ruiz, Anson Hines, Dani Lipski A. Larval Tolerance Experiments B. Green Crab Trapping Network 3. Fouling Community Studies – Gregory Ruiz, Anson Hines, Linda McCann, Kimberly Philips, George Smith 4. Taxonomic Field Surveys A. Motile Crustacea on Fouling Plates– Jeff Cordell B. Hydroids – Leanne Henry C. Pelagic Cnidaria and Ctenophora – Claudia Mills D. Anthozoa – Anson Hines & Nora Foster E. Bryozoans – Judith Winston F. Nemertineans – Jon Norenburg & Svetlana Maslakova G. Brachyura – Anson Hines H. Molluscs – Nora Foster I. Urochordates and Hemichordates – Sarah Cohen J. Echinoderms –Anson Hines & Nora Foster K. Wetland Plants - Dennis Whigham 2 Executive Summary This report summarizes research on nonindigenous species (NIS) in marine ecosystems of Alaska during the year 2000 by the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. The project is an extension of three years of research on NIS in Prince William Sound, which is presented in a major report (Hines and Ruiz, 2000) that is on line at the website of the Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council: www.pwsrcac.org.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT SKELTON, HAYLEY MOYNE. Nutritional Features And
    ABSTRACT SKELTON, HAYLEY MOYNE. Nutritional Features and Feeding Behavior of the Heterotrophic Dinoflagellate Pfiesteria shumwayae. (Under the direction of JoAnn M. Burkholder and Daniel L. Kamykowski.) Dinoflagellates are a diverse group of protists, and approximately half of the ca. 2000 extant species are obligate heterotrophs. Heterotrophic dinoflagellates are widespread and often abundant in aquatic ecosystems, contributing to the transfer of organic matter in aquatic food webs and representing a link between primary production and metazooplankton. Knowledge of heterotrophic dinoflagellate nutrition and feeding behavior is needed to better evaluate the role and impact of these ecologically significant protists in microbial communities. The dinoflagellate genus Pfiesteria contains P. piscicida and P. shumwayae, two heterotrophic species commonly found in temperate estuarine and coastal waters of the U.S. Atlantic coast. Pfiesteria spp. are among the relatively few heterotrophic dinoflagellates that have been maintained in long-term culture, which has facilitated research on the biology and ecology of these species. Detailed studies on the physiology and biochemistry of Pfiesteria spp., however, have been complicated by the inability to culture these dinoflagellates in the absence of living prey and bacteria. The present research focused on one Pfiesteria species, P. shumwayae. Pfiesteria shumwayae strains cultured bacteria-free on a fish cell line were used to investigate phosphatase enzymes in this dinoflagellate. Cellular localization of enzyme activity was determined with the fluorescent probe ELF-97. Phosphatase activity also was evaluated at three different pH values using traditional colorimetric methods. The location of enzyme activity and supporting colorimetric measurements suggested that acid phosphatases predominate in P. shumwayae and have a general catabolic function.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites and Phytoplankton, with Special Emphasis on Dinoflagellate
    J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 51(2), 2004 pp. 145±155 q 2004 by the Society of Protozoologists Parasites and Phytoplankton, with Special Emphasis on Dino¯agellate Infections1 MYUNG GIL PARK,a WONHO YIHb and D. WAYNE COATSc aDepartment of Oceanography, College of Natural Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Republic of Korea, and bDepartment of Oceanography, Kunsan National University, Kunsan 573-701, Republic of Korea, and cSmithsonian Environmental Research Center, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037, USA ABSTRACT. Planktonic members of most algal groups are known to harbor intracellular symbionts, including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa. Among the dino¯agellates, viral and bacterial associations were recognized a quarter century ago, yet their impact on host populations remains largely unresolved. By contrast, fungal and protozoan infections of dino¯agellates are well documented and generally viewed as playing major roles in host population dynamics. Our understanding of fungal parasites is largely based on studies for freshwater diatoms and dino¯agellates, although fungal infections are known for some marine phytoplankton. In freshwater systems, fungal chytrids have been linked to mass mortalities of host organisms, suppression or retardation of phytoplankton blooms, and selective effects on species composition leading to successional changes in plankton communities. Parasitic dino¯agellates of the genus Amoe- bophrya and the newly described Perkinsozoa, Parvilucifera infectans, are widely distributed in coastal waters of the world where they commonly infect photosynthetic and heterotrophic dino¯agellates. Recent work indicates that these parasites can have signi®cant impacts on host physiology, behavior, and bloom dynamics. Thus, parasitism needs to be carefully considered in developing concepts about plankton dynamics and the ¯ow of material in marine food webs.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites on Appendicularia (Oikopleura (Vexillaria) Dioica) From
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438 Parasites on Appendicularia (Oikopleura (Vexillaria) dioica ) from Sea of Marmara, Turkey M. Levent Artüz Sevinç-Erdal İnönü Foundation, Department of Marine Sciences, Anadoluhisarı Toplarönü No: 8, 34810, Istanbul, Turkey e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: In the various sites in Sea of Marmara, Appendicularian Oikopleura (Vexillaria) dioica were invaded by Oodinium sp. This study provides the first evidence of Oodinium sp. in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. High probability of a fatal attack to the zooplankton communities will affect directly to the biodiversity via food web and finally to the fishery of the area. The effect may grow or/and spread exponentially to the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea, because of the oceanographical and biological specialities of the Sea of Marmara and its connections trough Turkish straits. This study emphasizes the consequences of parasitic infection in the case of the special position of Sea of Marmara. Keywords: Appendicularia, Oodinium, Parasites, Sea of Marmara, Zooplankton. 1. Introduction Parasitism may reduce zooplankter’s general condition with Plankton net with a 650 mm net diameter and of 0.180 mm lethal effect [1], and it has developed effects on the mesh size were used as sampling gear. Two replicates were biodiversity and to the sustainability of stocks, which appears taken at each station. For the vertical haul, the net lowered to important to assess this case. the maximum depth and hauled all the water column, for oblique hauls used closed nets with same sizes from the Representatives of the genus Oodinium are common parasites depth of thermocline layer (average 25 m depth) and of Appendicularia.
    [Show full text]