DOCSLIB.ORG

Meaning and Argument an Introduction to Logic Through Language 2Nd Edition Pdf Free Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meaning and Argument an Introduction to Logic Through Language 2Nd Edition Pdf Free Download MEANING AND ARGUMENT AN INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC THROUGH LANGUAGE 2ND EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Ernest Lepore | --- | --- | --- | 9781118390191 | --- | --- Meaning and Argument An Introduction to Logic Through Language 2nd edition PDF Book Volume II. The text should easily stand the test of time. Revised Edition Paperbacks Books. Free Semantics. Good Deals On Used Books. The range of natural language constructions surveyed is broader and richer than in any competing introductory logic text that I am aware of. Show Details Description:. The text including examples and exercises did not seem to be offensive or insensitive in any specific way. The book contains no grammatical errors. None of these small errors detract from the quality of the content, though. The book is consistent in terminology, formatting, and examples. The book covers the important elementary information, clearly discussing such things as the purpose and basic structure of an argument; the difference between an Designing Meaningful Agents. The book's four chapters make it mostly self-referential. My favorite part of this book is that it seems to be written for community college students. I liked the overall structure of this book. Evaluating Arguments in Property Predicate Logic. It is quite comprehensive for a beginner book, but seems to be a good text for a course that needs a foundation for arguments. Wiley-Blackwell The content is excellent. Comprehensiveness rating: 4 see less. Download options PhilArchive copy. Configure custom resolver. Semantics in Philosophy of Language. You may also like. For example, Chapter 3, together with a few sections from Chapter 1, can be used as a short introduction to inductive logic. Greg Restall - - Routledge. Philosophy of religion. Formats Available PDF. This textbook covers enough topics for a first-year course on logic and critical thinking. History of Western Philosophy. Meaning and Argument An Introduction to Logic Through Language 2nd edition Writer The author writes in a very conversational, easy-to-read manner. Shop Now. Buy It Now. The book focuses on the use of logic to expose and remedy many difficulties with understanding a sentence's exact meaning. Oleksiy rated it really liked it Apr 26, None of these small errors detract from the quality of the content, though. The content is excellent. I used the PDF and it worked fine on various devices without loosing formatting. Show More Show Less. Paperback Language Books. Property Predicate Logic Refinements. Kent Johnson , University of California at Irvine " Meaning and Argument is an excellent logic textbook that not only introduces students to the techniques of English symbolization and the truth-tree method, but it also to a fascinating array of topics in linguistic syntax and semantics, including logical form, anaphora, adverbial modification, descriptions, among others. The book covers the definitions and how first order and similar logics work and explains how to translate English sentences into logic, covering many aspects of how the phrases can be interpreted. It also does a good job introducing and discussing informal fallacies Chapter 4. The structure and flow of his book is fine. Philosophy of language. Added to PP index Total views 14 , of 2,, Recent downloads 6 months 1 , of 2,, How can I increase my downloads? Anh rated it it was amazing Jun 10, Van Cleave Language: English. William Michael Books. There are an abundance of examples that inspire students to look at issues from many different political viewpoints, challenging students to practice evaluating arguments, and identifying fallacies. Home Price Comparison A glossary was not included. Find it on Amazon. I think the author loses the balance of a conversational, helpful tone and focuses too heavily on equations. We use different types of cookies to optimize your experience on our website. This textbook is not particularly comprehensive 4 chapters long , but I view that as a benefit. Because of the logical arrangement of the text and the many sub-sections, additional material should be very easy to add. Negation, Only, and Restrictive Relative Clauses. Comments The writing style is excellent for the subject matter, especially in the third section explaining logical fallacies. Revision history. The content is very reader-friendly, and the author writes with authority and clarity throughout the text. This new edition adds clarifications of the notions of explanation, validity and formal validity, a more detailed discussion of derivation strategies, and another rule of inference, Reiteration. These are cookies that have not yet been categorized. Preview — Meaning and Argument by Ernest Lepore. These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. The text is free if interface issues. Book was recommended. Sort order. No keywords specified fix it. Add to Cart. Property Predicate Logic Refinements. The book covers the important elementary information, clearly discussing such things as the purpose and basic structure of an argument; the difference between an argument and an explanation; validity; soundness; and the distinctions between an inductive and a deductive argument in accessible terms in the first chapter. Chapter 4 has no exercises either. It flows well from one topic to the next, but it is also possible to jump around the text without loosing the voice of the text. Edit this record. Content Accuracy rating: 5 The books is accurate in the information it presents. Meaning and Argument An Introduction to Logic Through Language 2nd edition Reviews Skip to main content. Didn't find what you're looking for? More diversity, especially in the examples, would be appropriate and appreciated. Edit this record. Configure custom resolver. Gamut, Logic, Language, and Meaning. Sign in Create an account. Related Articles. All the images, charts, and graphs were very clear Grammatical Errors rating: 5 I found no grammatical errors in the text. For instance, there is one example that mentions the rumors of Barack Obama's birthplace as somewhere other than the United States. To find out more about how WHSmith use cookies Read our cookie policy. World of Books Ltd. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Reconstructing and analyzing arguments 1. Malcolm Forster - manuscript. Goodman - - Upa. Show Details Description:. One thing I really liked about this text was the author's wide variety of examples. See details for description of any imperfections. Reviews Learn more about reviews. Concentrates on symbolization and does all the technical logic simply with truth tables and no derivations at all. Edit this record. Cultural Relevance rating: 4 The textbook is not culturally insensitive, making use of a diversity of inclusive examples. A glossary was not included. Didn't find what you're looking for? Evaluating Arguments in Property Predicate Logic. Find it on Scholar. There are a few surface-level typos Starbuck's instead of Starbucks, etc. The item may have some signs of cosmetic wear, but is fully operational and functions as intended. Consistency rating: 5 The textbook is internally consistent. Pre-owned Pre-owned. Meaning and Argument An Introduction to Logic Through Language 2nd edition Read Online Add one. One thing I really liked about this text was the author's wide variety of examples. Ernest Lepore: Meaning and Argument. Edit this record. The content is excellent. Ernest Lepore: Meaning and Argument. About Ernest Lepore. Modularity rating: 4 The text is fairly easily divisible. There are a few surface-level typos Starbuck's instead of Starbucks, etc. Comprehensiveness rating: 4 see less. Robert Biehl rated it it was amazing Jul 20, It flows well from one topic to the next, but it is also possible to jump around the text without loosing the voice of the text. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Reconstructing and analyzing arguments 1. Oleksiy rated it really liked it Apr 26, Grammatical Errors rating: 5 1. Click on the categories below to learn more about their purpose. Chapter 1 covers the basics as in any standard textbook in this area. About us. My students have trouble understanding readings in the New York Times, so it is nice to see a logic and critical thinking text use real language that students can understand and follow without the constant need of a dictionary. Philosophy of religion. Did you know that since , Biblio has used its profits to build 16 public libraries in rural villages of South America? Distinctive approach in that this text is a philosophical, rather than mathematical introduction to logic Concentrates on symbolization and does all the Meaning and Argument shifts introductory logic from the traditional emphasis on proofs to the symbolization of arguments. It ends abruptly--I didn't realize that it had ended, and all of a sudden I found myself in the answer section for those earlier exercises. Self Help. Editorial team. Pre-owned Pre-owned. Designing Meaningful Agents. There is index, but no glossary. There are no exercises in the rest of the chapter. Add to cart Buy Now Item Price. The ideas addressed in Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking are accurate but at times notably political. https://files8.webydo.com/9582811/UploadedFiles/F3CCC0F8-B2E1-1E94-D28F-EDBBF1D2DE43.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583723/UploadedFiles/86E4CB53-CF02-8BA2-0D51-2F2911D660F4.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583024/UploadedFiles/60774929-AAC9-039B-CBFB-BC7E26AC4B0C.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583896/UploadedFiles/05D0DA4F-9504-782E-6833-C637F2D13165.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583188/UploadedFiles/EB7432EC-A9DA-B747-4965-67284DDAAE00.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583552/UploadedFiles/596BAC69-E5C3-2FAC-BD00-B9B637E3364E.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583432/UploadedFiles/03A52AB8-FED9-159A-9A6C-F638F10524EE.pdf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gillian K. Russell
    Gillian K. Russell Dianoia Institute of Philosophy (cell) +1 (858) 205{2834 Locked Bag 4115 MDC [email protected] Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 https://www.gillianrussell.net Australia Current Employment Professor of Philosophy Dianoia Institute at ACU in Melbourne 2020| 1 Arch´eProfessorial Fellow ( 5 th time) University of St Andrews, Scotland 2019{2023 Employment and Education History Alumni Distinguished Professor University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2019{2020 Professor of Philosophy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2015{19 Associate Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2011{2015 Assistant Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2004{2011 Killam Postdoctoral Fellow University of Alberta 2005 Ph.D. in Philosophy Princeton University 2004 M.A. in Philosophy Princeton University 2002 M.A. in German and Philosophy University of St Andrews, Scotland 1999 Areas of Specialisation Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Logic, Epistemology Areas of Competence Logic, History of Analytic Philosophy, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Science and Mathematics Books { Truth in Virtue of Meaning: a defence of the analytic/synthetic distinction (Oxford, 2008) { The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, with Delia Graff Fara (eds.) (Routledge, 2011) { New Waves in Philosophical Logic, with Greg Restall (eds.) (Palgrave MacMillan, 2012) Accepted and Published Papers { \Social Spheres" forthcoming in Feminist Philosophy and Formal Logic Audrey Yap and Roy Cook (eds) { \Logic: A Feminist Approach" forthcoming in Philosophy for Girls: An invitation to the life of thought, M. Shew and K. Garchar (eds) (Oxford University Press, 2020) { \Waismann's Papers on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction" in Friedrich Waismann: The Open Texture of Analytic Philosophy, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Proof Theory for Philosophy Notes for the Sellc 2010 Course Structures for Proofs
    proof theory for philosophy notes for the sellc 2010 course Structures for Proofs Greg Restall Philosophy Department University of Melbourne [email protected] http://consequently.org/writing/ptp version of november 30, 2010 c greg restall contents 1 Why Proof Theory? | 7 2 Natural Deduction for Conditionals | 11 2.1 The Language 11 2.2 Proofs for Conditionals 13 2.3 Normal Proofs 21 2.4 Strong Normalisation 31 2.5 Proofs and λ-Terms 36 2.6 History 43 2.7 Exercises 46 3 Sequents for Conjunction & Disjunction | 53 3.1 Derivations 54 3.2 Identity & Cut 56 3.3 Consequences of Cut Elimination 64 3.4 History 67 3.5 Exercises 68 4 Proofs & Derivations: Trees | 73 4.1 Sequents for Linear Conditionals 73 4.2 Structural Rules 87 4.3 Conjunction and Disjunction 93 4.4 Negation 97 4.5 Cut Elimination 101 4.6 Exercises 104 5 Proofs & Derivations: Circuits | 107 5.1 Sequents for Classical Logic 107 5.2 Truth Tables and Cut 109 5.3 Derivations describing Circuits 115 5.4 Circuits from Derivations 123 5.5 Correct Circuits 124 5.6 Normal Circuits 129 5.7 Classical Circuits 131 5.8 History and other matters 133 5.9 Exercises 134 References | 139 2 [november 30, 2010] introduction This manuscript is a draft of a guided introduction to logic and its I should like to outline an image applications in philosophy. The focus will be a detailed examination of which is connected with the most profound intuitions which I always the different ways to understand proof.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Abstract the Summer Program for Diversity in Logic for Undergraduates Builds Upon the PIKSI Summer Program Model, Focusi
    Project Abstract The Summer Program for Diversity in Logic for Undergraduates builds upon the PIKSI Summer Program Model, focusing on Logic, an area in philosophy needing to increase diversity. We request seed funding for the pilot run of the program in May of 2016, when we will offer 12 students the opportunity to explore an exciting research theme in Logic –Paradoxes—receive small-group tutoring in formal techniques, receive mentoring and support for professionalization, experience validation, understanding and advice regarding diversity issues they have encountered –sexism, racism, ableism (and which the students may worry about encountering them in the profession), and develop a sense of community with students and faculty with whom they can identify and, in turn, come to strengthen their own identities. Project Purpose Our goal is to empower students to conceive of themselves as aspiring logicians, philosophers of logic and formal philosophers who belong in our profession. As Audrey Yap has noted, a majority of philosophy majors encounter some logic as a part of their undergraduate curriculum. Increasing diversity in logic is not simply a problem of exposure, but concretely addressing underlying pressures women and minority students experience, particularly stereotype threat and pernicious ideas about “natural aptitude.” (1) These pressures are especially strong in the subfield of logic, where almost no women and minorities have contributed to the research literature until very recently, and women and minorities remain underrepresented to a higher degree than in philosophy more broadly. Women and minorities learning logic can be vulnerable to feeling that a field like logic, that tends to be male and white dominated on the whole, is not welcoming to them.
    [Show full text]
  • New Waves in Philosophical Logic New Waves in Philosophy Series Editors: Vincent F
    New Waves in Philosophical Logic New Waves in Philosophy Series Editors: Vincent F. Hendricks and Duncan Pritchard Titles include: Jesús H. Aguilar, Andrei A. Buckareff and Keith Frankish (editors) NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHY OF ACTION Michael Brady NEW WAVES IN META-ETHICS Thom Brooks (editor) NEW WAVES IN ETHICS Otavio Bueno and Oystein Linnebo (editors) NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS Boudewijn DeBruin and Christopher F. Zurn (editors) NEW WAVES IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Maksymilian Del Mar NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW Allan Hazlett (editor) NEW WAVES IN METAPHYSICS Vincent F. Hendricks and Duncan Pritchard (editors) NEW WAVES IN EPISTEMOLOGY P.D. Magnus and Jacob Busch (editors) NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Yujin Nagasawa and Erik J. Wielenberg (editors) NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan Selinger and Soren Riis (editors) NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY Thomas S. Petersen, Jesper Ryberg and Clark Wolf (editors) NEW WAVES IN APPLIED ETHICS Greg Restall and Gillian Russell (editors) NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC Sarah Sawyer (editor) NEW WAVES IN PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Kathleen Stock and Katherine Thomson-Jones (editors) NEW WAVES IN AESTHETICS Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen and Cory D. Wright (editors) NEW WAVES IN TRUTH Future Volumes New Waves in Philosophy of Mind New Waves in Formal Philosophy New Waves in Philosophy Series Standing Order ISBN 978–0–230–53797–2 (hardcover) Series Standing Order ISBN 978–0–230–53798–9 (paperback) (outside North America only) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order. Please contact your bookseller or, in case of difficulty, write to us at the address below with your name and address, the title of the series and one of the ISBN quoted above.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: at the Intersection of Truth and Falsity
    Introduction: At the Intersection of Truth and Falsity JC Beall ‘Now we will take another line of reasoning. When you follow two separate chains of thought, Watson, you will find some point of intersection which should approximate to the truth.’—Sherlock Holmes, in ‘The Disappearance of Lady Frances Carfax’. 1. TOWARDS THE INTERSECTION Suppose that we have (at least) two categories X and Y for any meaningful, declarative sentence A of our language.É Pending further information about X and Y, there seem to be four options for an arbitrary sentence A: » A is only in X » A is only in Y » A is in both X and Y » A is in neither X nor Y Whether each such ‘option’ is logically possible depends not only on our logic (about which more below) but on the details of X and Y. Suppose that X comprises all (and only) sentences composed of exactly six words, and Y those with exactly nineteen words. In that case, only the third option is ruled out: X and Y are exclusive—their intersection X ∩ Y is empty—since no A can be composed of exactly six words and also be composed of exactly nineteen words.Ê Despite being exclusive, X and Y are not exhaustive—their union X ∪ Y does not exhaust all sentences—since some A may fall into neither X nor Y. (Just consider ‘Max sat on Agnes’.) Consider another example. Let X comprise all sentences of your favourite novel and Y your all-time favourite sentences. In that case, exclusion is not ruled out; the intersection of X and Y may well be non-empty.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Logical Pluralism
    Defending Logical Pluralism .................................................................... JC Beall Greg Restall School of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Tasmania Macquarie University .................................................................... Version of May 17, 1999 1 Introducing Logical Pluralism We are pluralists about logical consequence [1]. We hold that there is more than one sense in which arguments may be deductively valid, that these senses are equally good, and equally deserving of the name deductive validity. Our pluralism starts with our analysis of consequence. This analysis of con- sequence is not idiosyncratic. We agree with Richard Jeffrey, and with many other philosophers of logic about how logical consequence is to be defined. To quote Jeffrey: Formal logic is the science of deduction. It aims to provide system- atic means for telling whether or not given conclusions follow from given premises, i.e., whether arguments are valid or invalid . Validity is easily defined: A valid argument is one whose conclusion is true in every case in which all its premises are true. Then the mark of validity is absence of counterexamples, cases in which all premises are true but the conclusion is false. Difficulties in applying this definition arise from difficulties in can- vassingthecasesmentionedinit...[6,page1] We agree that deductive validity is a matter of the preservation of truth in all cases. An argument is valid when there is no counterexample to it: that is, there is no case in which the premises are true and in which the conclusion is not true. We call this account of validity (V) for short. Our pluralism stems from the difficulties to which Jeffrey alludes. We hold that there is more than one notion of case which may be substituted (correctly) into the defining scheme for validity.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillian K. Russell
    Gillian K. Russell Dianoia Institute of Philosophy (cell) (858) 205{2834 Locked Bag 4115 MDC [email protected] Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 https://www.gillianrussell.net Australia Current Employment Professor of Philosophy Dianoia Institute at ACU in Melbourne 2020| 1 Arch´eProfessorial Fellow ( 5 th time) University of St Andrews, Scotland 2019{2023 Employment and Education History Alumni Distinguished Professor University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2019{2020 Professor of Philosophy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2015{19 Associate Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2011{2015 Assistant Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2004{2011 Killam Postdoctoral Fellow University of Alberta 2005 Ph.D. in Philosophy Princeton University 2004 M.A. in Philosophy Princeton University 2002 M.A. in German and Philosophy University of St Andrews, Scotland 1999 Areas of Specialisation Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Logic, Epistemology Areas of Competence Logic, History of Analytic Philosophy, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Science and Mathematics Books { Truth in Virtue of Meaning: a defence of the analytic/synthetic distinction (Oxford, 2008) { The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, with Delia Graff Fara (eds.) (Routledge, 2011) { New Waves in Philosophical Logic, with Greg Restall (eds.) (Palgrave MacMillan, 2012) Accepted and Published Papers { \Social Spheres" forthcoming in Feminist Philosophy and Formal Logic Audrey Yap and Roy Cook (eds) { \Logic: A Feminist Approach" forthcoming in Philosophy for Girls: An invitation to the life of thought, M. Shew and K. Garchar (eds) (Oxford University Press, 2020) { \Waismann's Papers on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction" in Friedrich Waismann: The Open Texture of Analytic Philosophy, D.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE 1. Introduction
    HISTORY OF LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE CONRAD ASMUS AND GREG RESTALL 1. Introduction Consequence is a, if not the, core subject matter of logic. Aristotle's study of the syllogism instigated the task of categorising arguments into the logically good and the logically bad; the task remains an essential element of the study of logic. In a logically good argument, the conclusion follows validly from the premises; thus, the study of consequence and the study of validity are the same. In what follows, we will engage with a variety of approaches to consequence. The following neutral framework will enhance the discussion of this wide range of approaches. Consequences are conclusions of valid arguments. Arguments have two parts: a conclusion and a collection of premises. The conclusion and the premises are all entities of the same sort. We will call the conclusion and premises of an argument the argument's components and will refer to anything that can be an argument component as a proposition. The class of propositions is defined func- tionally (they are the entities which play the functional role of argument compo- nents); thus, the label should be interpreted as metaphysically neutral. Given the platonistic baggage often associated with the label \proposition", this may seem a strange choice but the label is already used for the argument components of many of the approaches below (discussions of Aristotlean and Medieval logic are two ex- amples). A consequence relation is a relation between collections of premises and conclusions; a collection of premises is related to a conclusion if and only if the latter is a consequence of the former.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    FRANCESCO BERTO Updated 07/05/2020 Birth Place: Venice, Italy Professor of Logic and Metaphysics, Department of Philosophy, University of St Andrews Edgecliffe, The Scores, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, United Kingdom [email protected] Research Chair, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam Oude Turfmarkt 141, 1012 GC Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3246-657X 1 1. JOBS, POSITIONS, AFFILIATIONS 1.1. November 2020 : Honorary Chair Mercier, Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, Université Catholique de Louvain. 1.2. August 2020 - ___ : Editor-in-chief, The Philosophical Quarterly. 1.3. September 2018 - ___ : Professor of Logic and Metaphysics, Department of Philosophy, University of St Andrews. 1.4. September 2018 - ___ : Part-time Research Chair, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam. 1.5. May 2018: Member of the Logicians Liberation League (LLL) as Holder of Hegel’s Spirit http://aal.ltumathstats.com/curios/logicians-liberation-league. 1.6. September 2017 - ____ : Affiliated Member of EIDOS, the research centre in metaphysics, Universities of Geneva and Italian Switzerland. 1.7. September 2018 - January 2019: Research Fellow at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study (NIAS) (fellowship offered, but turned down due to the position accepted in St Andrews). 1.8. January 2014 - August 2018: Full Professor and Structural Chair, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation and Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam. 1.9. January 2014 - July 2015: AHRC Project Leader, Department of Philosophy, University of Aberdeen. 1.10. August 2012 - January 2014: Senior Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • Pluralism.Pdf
    Logical Pluralism ...................................................... JC Beall and Greg Restall Version of March 28, 2000 Abstract: A widespread assumption in contemporary philosophy of logic is that there is one true logic, that there is one and only one correct answer as to whether a given argument is deductively valid. In this paper we propose an alternative view, logical pluralism. According to logical pluralism there is not one true logic; there are many. There is not always a single answer to the question “is this argument valid?” 1 Logic, Logics and Consequence Anyone acquainted with contemporary Logic knows that there are many so-called logics.1 But are these logics rightly so-called? Are any of the menagerie of non-classical logics, such as relevant logics, intuitionistic logic, paraconsistent logics or quantum logics, as deserving of the title ‘logic’ as classical logic? On the other hand, is classical logic really as de- serving of the title ‘logic’ as relevant logic (or any of the other non-classical logics)? If so, why so? If not, why not? Logic has a chief subject matter: Logical Consequence. The chief aim of logic is to account for consequence — to say, accurately and systematically, what consequence amounts to, which is normally done by specifying which arguments (in a given language) are valid. All of this, at least today, is common ground. Logic has not always been seen in this light. Years ago, Logic was dom- inated by the Frege–Russell picture which treats logical truth as the lead character and consequence as secondary. The contemporary picture re- verses the cast: consequence is the lead character.
    [Show full text]
  • Greg Restall Is Associate Professor in Philosophy at Melbourne University, Australia
    Logic Logic is a comprehensive introduction to the major concepts and techniques involved in the study of logic. It explores both formal and philosophical logic and examines the ways in which we can achieve good reasoning. The methods of logic are essential to an understanding of philosophy and are also crucial in the study of mathematics, computing, linguistics and in many other domains. Individual chapters include: • Propositions and arguments • Truth tables • Trees • Conditionality • Natural deduction • Predicate, names and quantifiers • Definite descriptions Logic is an exceptionally clear introduction to the subject and is ideally suited to students taking an introductory course in logic. Greg Restall is Associate Professor in Philosophy at Melbourne University, Australia. Fundamentals of Philosophy Series editor: John Shand This series presents an up-to-date set of engrossing, accurate and lively introductions to all the core areas of philosophy. Each volume is written by an enthusiastic and knowledgeable teacher of the area in question. Care has been taken to produce works that while even-handed are not mere bland expositions, and as such are original pieces of philosophy in their own right. The reader should not only be well informed by the series, but also experience the intellectual excitement of being engaged in philosophical debate itself. The volumes serve as an essential basis for the under-graduate courses to which they relate, as well as being accessible and absorbing for the general reader. Together they comprise an indispensable
    [Show full text]
  • Gillian K. Russell
    Gillian K. Russell Department of Philosophy (cell) (858) 205{2834 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill gillian [email protected] Caldwell Hall, CB 3125 http://www.gillianrussell.net 240 East Cameron Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3125 Education and Employment History Professor of Philosophy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2015{ Associate Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2011{2015 Assistant Professor in Philosophy Washington University in St Louis 2004{2011 Killam Postdoctoral Fellow University of Alberta 2005 Ph.D. in Philosophy Princeton University 2004 M.A. in Philosophy Princeton University 2002 M.A. in German and Philosophy University of St Andrews, Scotland 1999 Areas of Specialisation Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Logic, Epistemology Areas of Competence Logic, History of Analytic Philosophy, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Science and Mathematics Books Monographs { Truth in Virtue of Meaning: a defence of the analytic/synthetic distinction (Oxford, 2008) { I am currently writing a book on barriers to entailment. Edited Collections { The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, with Delia Graff Fara (eds.) (Routledge, 2011) { New Waves in Philosophical Logic, with Greg Restall (eds.) (Palgrave MacMillan, 2012) Accepted and Published Papers { \Hybrid Identities and Just Being Yourself," in Inquiry, Volume 57, Issue 4, 2014. { \The Justification of the Basic Laws of Logic," in the Journal of Philosophical Logic, pages 1{11, March 2015. { \Metaphysical Analyticity and the Epistemology of Logic," forthcoming in Philosophical Studies. { \Quine on Analyticity" in A Companion to W. V. O. Quine (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy), Gilbert Harman and Ernie Lepore (eds.) (Blackwell, 2013) { \Logical Pluralism" in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ed Zalta (ed.) (CLSI, 2013) { \Practicing Evil" forthcoming in The Philosophy of the Martial Arts, G.
    [Show full text]