Research Report (.Pdf)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Report (.Pdf) WE. CELEBRATIONS. THE STATE A Sociological Study of How National Holidays are Celebrated RIGA 2008 We.Celebrations.The State 2007/2008 This document was prepared with the financial support of the European Union. The Baltic Institute of Social Sciences is fully responsible for the content of the publication, and nothing herein shall be taken to represent the views of the European Union. Academic editor: Dr.sc.soc. Brigita Zepa Authors: Brigita Zepa, Evija Kļave, Oksana Žabko, Līga Krastiņa, Iveta Bebriša, Zane Jansone, Lelde Vaivode, Liene Beriņa Project directors: Inese Šūpule, Evija Kļave Empirical materials for the study prepared by: Inese Šūpule, Evija Kļave, Oksana Žabko, Līga Krastiņa, Iveta Bebriša, Indra Strautiņa, Lelde Vaivode, Liene Beriņa, Ilze Ieviņa, Viesturs Vēveris, Elgars Felcis, Dainis Grīnvalds Translation: Kārlis Streips © Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, 2008 ISBN 978-9984-9940-3-1 © Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, 2008 2 We.Celebrations.The State 2007/2008 Content Introduction.................................................................................................................. 4 Conclusions and recommendations ..................................................................... 6 Celebrating state holidays: practice and research in different countries........................................................................................................................ 20 The investment of state holidays in a sense of community in society............................................................................................................................. 23 Celebration of state holidays in Latvia in 2007 ............................................... 28 1. Celebrations from the perspective of observers........................... 28 2. The discourse of the holiday in public addresses......................... 60 3. Views about holiday objects and proceedings – results of express surveys.................................................................................... 73 4. The views of local rezidents about state holidays and the 78 way in which they are customarily celebrated.......................... 5. Celebration of state holidays in schools........................................... 109 6. Holiday discourse in the mass media................................................ 120 7. Strategies for organising state holidays........................................... 164 References ...................................................................................................................... 196 Description of the research ........................................................................................ 198 © Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, 2008 3 We.Celebrations.The State 2007/2008 Introduction The well known American sociologist Amitai Etzioni is one of very few researchers to have focused on the sociological examination of celebrations. One of his books is called “We Are What We Celebrate”. This is a suggestive phrase which encourages us to look at holidays and how they are celebrated from different aspects. On the one hand, holidays and celebrations have something important to say about the relevant society. In the context of national holidays, these are issues about a sense of community with the state and its population, about loyalty and the various manifestations of patriotism. On the other hand, the visions, planning, organisation and celebration of holidays can offer ways of shaping the aforementioned properties among members of the public. Researchers in Latvia have done very little work in the area of holidays, except for research focused on the Latvian Song Festival.1 When it comes to national holidays and how they are celebrated, however, there has been no specific research. Specialists have not focused on the celebration of national holidays as a factor which promotes civic understanding and national identity. There are many arguments in the scholarly literature about how public celebrations and rituals affect the emergence of common value in a society, how they strengthen emotional links. We know of traditions in many countries which relate to the celebration of important holidays. This is true in the United States, Canada, India, Norway and many other countries where national holidays are seen as a very important way of forming the sense of a civic community. The aim of this study is to offer a thorough analysis of how national holidays are celebrated and to reveal the way in which this promotes unity in society. We also seek to reveal those things which limit joy about holidays. What is it about our celebrations which drives some people away, facilitating greater alienation vis-à-vis the country and its government? The study will serve as an informative framework for the establishment of conceptual justifications and scenarios for holidays. At the centre of the study is research about how four state holidays were celebrated in 2007. These were May 1, which is alternatively known as Labour Day, as the date when the Latvian Constitutional Convention was assembled in the early days of independence after World War I, and the date on which, in 2004, Latvia joined the European Union; May 4, the date on which the Soviet Latvian parliament declared the reestablishment of Latvian independence in 1990; November 11, which is known as Lāčplēša Day and is Latvia’s version of Veteran’s Day; and November 18, the date on which the Republic of Latvia was established in 1918. Researchers observed the way in which these holidays were celebrated. Surveys were conducted among local residents, experts were interviewed, and focus groups were set up. Particular attention was focused on how holidays are celebrated in schools. Observations were made, and teachers, principals and students were interviewed. 1 The most important of these studies focused on how the Song Festival influences the emergence of national identity. Certain aspects of national holidays are reviewed in studies focused on ethnic integration and tolerance. See, e.g., Zepa, B., E. Kļave, et al (2004) „Cittautiešu jauniešu integrācija Latvijas sabiedrībā izglītības reformas kontekstā” (Integration of Non-Latvian Young People Into Latvia’s Society in the Context of Education Reform), Baltic Institute of Social Sciences. See also Zepa, B., L. Krastiņa, et al (2004) „Etniskā tolerance un Latvijas sabiedrības integrācija” (Ethnic Tolerance and Integration in Latvian Society), Baltic Institute of Social Sciences. © Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, 2008 4 We.Celebrations.The State 2007/2008 This document consists of an introduction and seven chapters. The introductory section offers a brief review of how holidays are celebrated and of the research traditions that have been brought to bear here. There are also conclusions and recommendations that have emerged from the research work. The first section of the result analysis, “Celebrations From the Perspective of an Observer”, considers the events which are part of holidays, focusing on organisational successes and failures, as well as the reaction of participants to what is happening. The second section, “Holiday Discourse in Public Speech”, uses discourse analysis to discover the most important aspects of such discourse, focusing, too, on the schemes of argumentation that are used in such speech. The third section, “Public Opinion About Holiday Proceedings”, looks at the views of local residents vis-à-vis holidays in May and November and the things that happen during those holidays. Post-holiday surveys were conducted for this purpose. The fourth section is “Local Residents on National Holidays and Customs of Celebration Therein”, considers the way in which local residents interpret national holidays, also analysing the celebrations which are habitual during those holidays. The fifth section, “Celebrating National Holidays at School”, focuses on the participants (students, teachers), as well as the events and objects of the holiday (preparations, events, speeches, performances, etc.). The sixth section, “Holiday Discourse in the Mass Media” analyses the way in which national holidays and related celebrations are reflected in Latvia’s leading Latvian and Russian language newspapers, Internet portals and television channels. Finally, the seventh section is “Strategies for Organising National Holidays and an Evaluation of Same”. Here the authors focus on the views of experts as to how holidays are organised, how they have been celebrated, and what their future prospects might be. © Baltic Institute of Social Sciences, 2008 5 We.Celebrations.The State 2007/2008 Conclusions and Recommendations This research makes it possible to review preparations for national holidays and the celebration of such holidays as three important components of political processes: Investment – process – result. The foundation for the investment consists of the resources and organisational processes that are needed to prepare for the holiday. The process is made up of the events of the holiday themselves – ceremonial speeches, ceremonies, concerts, and many other events, some with the participation of the audience. The result is made up of the feelings and emotions which participants glean from the holiday (Figure 1). The research shows that celebrations of national holidays, the amount of time spent in organising the celebrations, and the resources and artistic solutions that are put to use reflect the personal sense of organisers vis-à-vis the purpose of the celebrations
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report on Soes.Pdf
    Public Report on the State-Owned Enterprises and Shares in 2014 Cross-Sectoral Coordination Centre Riga 2015 2 Public Report regarding the State-Owned Capital Companies and Capital Shares Table of contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Financial summary about the fi nancial indicators of use of state capital .............................................................................4 Methodology and abbreviations used in the report ............................................................................................................6 Overview of the sectors Energy.....................................................................................................................................................................7 Forestry and agriculture ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Transport and logistics .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Communications ...................................................................................................................................................27 Real estate ............................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia 1988-2015: a Triumph of the Radical Nationalists
    The Baltic Centre of Historical and Socially Political Studies Victor Gushchin Latvia 1988-2015: a triumph of the radical nationalists Political support of the West for Latvian radical nationalism and neo-Nazismand the import of this ideology into Latvia after the West’s victory in the Cold War. Formation of a unipolar world led by the USA, revision of the 1945 Yalta and Potsdam treaties and the 1975 Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe as main reasons for the evolution of the Republic of Latvia of May 4th, 1990,from elimination of universal suffrage to relapse of totalitarianism: establishment of the so-called «Latvian Latvia», Russophobia, suppression of ethnic minority rights, restriction of freedom of speech and assembly, revision of the outcome of World War Two and propaganda of neo-Nazism. Riga 2017 UDK 94(474.3) “19/20” Gu 885 The book Latvia 1988-2015: a triumph of the radical nationalists» is dedicated to Latvia’s most recent history. On May 4, 1990, the Supreme Soviet (Supreme Council) of the Latvian SSR adopted the Declaration on the Restoration of Independence of the Latvian Republic without holding a national referendum, thus violating the acting Constitution. Following this up on October 15, 1991, the Supreme Soviet deprived more than a third of its own electorate Latvia 1988 - 2015: of the right to automatic citizenship. As a result, one of the most fundamental principles of a triumph of the radical nationalists democracy, universal suffrage, was eliminated. Thereafter, the Latvian parliament, periodically re-elected in conditions where a signif- icant part of country’s inhabitants lack the right to participate in elections, has been adopting Book 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Flag Act
    Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 14.06.2014 In force until: 31.12.2017 Translation published: 05.06.2014 Estonian Flag Act Passed 23.03.2005 RT I 2005, 20, 126 entry into force pursuant to section 26 Amended by the following acts Passed Published Entry into force 19.06.2008 RT I 2008, 35, 213 01.01.2009 18.06.2009 RT I 2009, 33, 214 02.07.2009 26.11.2009 RT I 2009, 62, 405 01.01.2010 22.04.2010 RT I 2010, 19, 101 01.06.2010 17.02.2011 RT I, 09.03.2011, 2 19.03.2011 21.05.2014 RT I, 04.06.2014, 1 14.06.2014 § 1. Estonian flag (1) The Estonian flag is blue, black and white. (2) The Estonian flag is used as the ethnic and the national flag. § 2. Description of Estonian flag (1) The Estonian flag is made up of three horizontal bands of colour of equal width. The upper band is blue, the middle one is black and the lower one is white. The hoist to fly ratio of the flag is 7:11. (2) An image of the Estonian flag is annexed to this Act. § 3. Hoisting of Estonian flag on the Pikk Hermann tower (1) The Estonian flag is hoisted on the Pikk Hermann tower in Tallinn every day at sunrise, but not earlier than 7.00 a.m., and is lowered at sunset. (2) On the hoisting of the Estonian flag on the Pikk Hermann tower, the opening phrases of the national anthem of Estonia are used as a musical signature, and the musical signature used when the Estonian flag is lowered is the signature created on the basis of a fragment of Gustav Ernesaks’s song Mu isamaa on minu arm[My Fatherland Is My Love] (lyrics by Lydia Koidula).
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia's Constitution of 1922, Reinstated in 1991, with Amendments Through 2016
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:36 constituteproject.org Latvia's Constitution of 1922, Reinstated in 1991, with Amendments through 2016 Subsequently amended This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:36 Table of contents Preamble . 3 Chapter I: General Provisions . 3 Chapter II: The Saeima . 4 Chapter III: The President . 8 Chapter IV: The Cabinet . 10 Chapter V: Legislation . 11 Chapter VI: Courts . 14 Chapter VII: The State Audit Office . 15 Chapter VIII: Fundamental Human Rights . 15 Latvia 1922 (reinst. 1991, rev. 2016) Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:36 • Preamble Preamble • Source of constitutional authority The people of Latvia, in freely elected Constitutional Assembly, have adopted the following State Constitution: • Reference to country's history • Right to self determination The State of Latvia, proclaimed on 18 November 1918, has been established by uniting historical Latvian lands and on the basis of the unwavering will of the Latvian nation to have its own State and its inalienable right of self-determination in order to guarantee the existence and development of the Latvian nation, its language and culture throughout the centuries, to ensure freedom and promote welfare of the people of Latvia and each individual. • Reference to country's history The people of Latvia won their State in the War of Liberation. They consolidated the system of government and adopted the Constitution in a freely elected Constitutional Assembly. • Reference to country's history The people of Latvia did not recognise the occupation regimes, resisted them and regained their freedom by restoring national independence on 4 May 1990 on the basis of continuity of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Concepts Surrounding Flags—An Analysis
    2? Intemational Congress of Vexillologv FlagBerlin2007 Page 591 Alexandra Dan Mandru: Moral Concepts surrounding Flags - an Analysis Abstract: Starting with thefirst Latin vexilli, and ending with the modern, diagonal- lined ensigns, flags have always contained a heavy load of morality and philosophy, bearing symbols ofgreat importance for their using body. This is the reason why the burning offlags is considered today as an act of great defying, against the entity which uses the flag. This paper contains a research of how are the moral principles reflected in flags, the manner in which an idea can be vexillologically illustrated within a piece of cloth. 1. Introduction: Essential Values and Principles reflected in Flags The existence of a flag is a consequence of a certain degree of sovereignty, independence or autonomy. Thus, a certain degree of self- reliance of the using body (whether it is a country, a territory or a corporation) is asserted within the simple bearing of the flag. This paper presents a new approach, regarding the moral content existing in flags. The range of moral concepts which will be analysed encompasses values, principles and abstract ideas, which find a way of concretisation with their appearance in flags. The colours tell much about the meaning of a flag. They can mean patriotism, the blood shed for the fatherland or love for one’s territory (red), or the connection with nature, faith, even mineral wealth (green). Nationalism is an important element in flags. The flags which express a nationalist attitude are charged with traditional colours, national symbols, etc. they can’t be used otherwise than as a national symbol.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia's Constitution of 1922, Reinstated in 1991, with Amendments Through 2007
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:36 constituteproject.org Latvia's Constitution of 1922, Reinstated in 1991, with Amendments through 2007 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:36 Table of contents Preamble . 3 Chapter I: General Provisions . 3 Chapter II: The Saeima . 3 Chapter III: The President . 7 Chapter IV: The Cabinet . 9 Chapter V: Legislation . 10 Chapter VI: Courts . 13 Chapter VII: The State Audit Office . 14 Chapter VIII: Fundamental Human Rights . 14 Latvia 1922 (reinst. 1991, rev. 2007) Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:36 • Source of constitutional authority • Preamble Preamble The people of Latvia, in freely elected Constitutional Assembly, have adopted the following State Constitution: Chapter I: General Provisions • Type of government envisioned Article 1 Latvia is an independent democratic republic. Article 2 The sovereign power of the State of Latvia is vested in the people of Latvia. • International law Article 3 The territory of the State of Latvia, within the borders established by international agreements, consists of Vidzeme, Latgale, Kurzeme and Zemgale. • National flag Article 4 • Official or national languages The Latvian language is the official language in the Republic of Latvia. The national flag of Latvia shall be red with a band of white. Chapter II: The Saeima • Structure of legislative chamber(s) Article 5 • Size of first chamber The Saeima shall be composed of one hundred representatives of the people. • Secret ballot Article 6 • First chamber selection The Saeima shall be elected in general, equal and direct elections, and by secret ballot based on proportional representation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latvian Direct Democracy Tools in a Comparative European Context
    The Latvian direct democracy tools in a comparative European context OÑATI SOCIO-LEGAL SERIES VOLUME 10, ISSUE 4 (2020), 744-788: INVESTIGATIONS – INVESTIGACIONES – IKERLANAK DOI LINK: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1075 RECEIVED 03 APRIL 2019, ACCEPTED 03 SEPTEMBER 2019 FABIO RATTO TRABUCCO∗ Abstract This article analyses and compares the legal tools of direct democracy in Latvia and other European countries. Based on comparison, the author draws concludes the shortcomings of the legal framework of direct democracy in the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia. The author analyses functioning of the direct democracy tools in Latvian practice and compares them with similar tools in other European countries, expressing his criticism towards Latvian legislation on the referendum and people’s initiative, finding that some mechanisms included in the Constitution are old- fashioned and ineffective. The article identifies actual shortcomings of the legal framework of the referendum and popular initiative both at the level of the Constitution and that of the law and makes suggestions for improvements of the mechanisms of direct democracy, particularly taking into account the experience of the other Baltic countries. Key words Latvia; national referendum; people’s initiative; parliamentary dissolution; recall referendum Resumen Este artículo analiza y compara las herramientas legales de la democracia directa en Letonia y en otros países europeos. Sobre la base de la comparación, el autor extrae conclusiones sobre las deficiencias del marco legal de la democracia directa letona. El autor analiza la legislación y la práctica letona sobre el referéndum y la iniciativa popular comparándola con las de otros países europeos, incluido el referéndum sobre la disolución del Parlamento, expresando críticas de que una serie de I wish to thank Profs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Symbols of Latvia
    The Latvian Institute promotes knowledge about Latvia abroad. It produces publications in several languages on many aspects of Latvia. For further information please contact the Latvian Embassy or Consulate in your country, or the Latvian Institute: Latvijas institūts, Kaļķu iela 7, Rīga, LV-1050, Latvia. Phone: (+371) 6750-3663 Fax: (+371) 6750-3669 National E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.li.lv, www.latvia.lv © The Latvian Institute, 2008 Photo credits: A.Eglītis, J.Kalniņš, M.Kudrjavcevs, Symbols A.Kukemilka (V/A "Tēvijas Sargs" photo archives), A.Korsaka, I.Lazdiņa, M.Lielkalns, LU photo archives A.Meiers, T.Nigulis, J.Pīgoznis, R.Rencis, J.Tālbergs, U.Vilks, J.Zalāns, Z.Zālmanis (LOK arhīvs). of Latvia The Flag 2 1 2 10 The maroon-white-maroon flag of Latvia is one of the oldest in the world and dates back to a battle against Estonian tribes near the Latvian town of Cēsis in the 13th century. According to one legend, it originated from a white sheet used to carry a mortally wounded Latvian tribal chief from the battlefield. Soaked with his blood on two sides, his soldiers hoisted the warrior’s sheet as a banner as it led them to victory. In the 1860’s Latvian student Jēkabs Lautenbahs-Jūsmiņš discovered a written reference to this flag in a collection of 13th century rhyming verse chronicles popular among the knights of the Livonian Order. These ‘songs’ glorified the feats of the Germanic Crusaders that sought to Christianize the pagan Latvian tribes. A half century later, in May 1917, artist Ansis Cīrulis used this historical description to design the flag as we know it today.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia Objective 1 Programme 2004-2006
    LLAATTVVIIAA Single Programming Document Objective 1 Programme 2004 – 2006 Riga 2003 Single Programming Document for Latvia Objective 1 Programme 2004-2006 Table of Content 1. Introduction..............................................................................................................13 2. Analysis....................................................................................................................15 2.1. General Description of the State.......................................................................15 2.1.1. Geographical Situation...............................................................................15 2.1.2. Administrative Division.............................................................................15 2.1.3. Demographic Situation ..............................................................................16 2.1.4. Quality of the Environment and Natural Resources ..................................16 2.2. Macroeconomic Context...................................................................................22 2.2.1. GDP Dynamics ..........................................................................................22 2.2.2. Inflation and Monetary Policy ...................................................................23 2.2.3. Fiscal Policy...............................................................................................24 2.2.4. Balance of Payments..................................................................................25 2.2.5. Investment in the Latvian
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
    Issuer: Constitutional Publication: Assembly Latvijas Vēstnesis, 43, Type: law 01.07.1993.; Latvijas Republikas Adoption: 15.02.1922. Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Entry into force: 07.11.1922. Ziņotājs, 6, 31.03.1994.; Valdības Vēstnesis, 141, 30.06.1922. Text consolidated by Valsts valodas centrs (State Language Centre) with amending laws of: 21 March 1933 [shall come into force from 21 March 1933]; 27 January 1994 [shall come into force from 26 February 1994]; 5 June 1996 [shall come into force from 26 June 1996]; 4 December 1997 [shall come into force from 31 December 1997]; 15 October 1998 [shall come into force from 6 November 1998]; 30 April 2002 [shall come into force from 24 May 2002]; 8 May 2003 [shall come into force from 5 June 2003]; 23 September 2004 [shall come into force from 21 October 2004]; 15 December 2005 [shall come into force from 17 January 2005]; 3 May 2007 [shall come into force from 31 May 2007]; 8 April 2009 [shall come into force from 2 November 2009]; 19 September 2013 [shall come into force from 18 October 2013]; 19 June 2014 [shall come into force from 22 July 2014]; 19 May 2016 [shall come into force from 14 June 2016]; 4 October 2018 [shall come into force from 1 January 2019]. If a whole or part of a section has been amended, the date of the amending law appears in square brackets at the end of the section. If a whole section, paragraph or clause has been deleted, the date of the deletion appears in square brackets beside the deleted section, paragraph or clause.
    [Show full text]
  • From Opposition to Independence: Social Movements in Latvia, 1986- 199 1
    FROM OPPOSITION TO INDEPENDENCE: SOCIAL MOVEMENTS IN LATVIA, 1986-199 1 by Daina Stukuls #569 March 1998 CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON SOCIAL ORGANIZATION WORKING PAPER SERIES The Center for Research on Social Organization is a facility of the Department of Sociology, The University of Michigan. Its primary mission is to support the research of faculty and students in the department's Social Organization graduate program. CRSO Working Papers report current research and reflection by affiliates of the Center To request copies of working papers, or for hrther information about Center activities, write us at 4501 LS&A Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, send e-mail to [email protected], or call (734) 764-7487. Introduction Prior to 1987, independent mass demonstrations in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Latvia, indeed, in the entire Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, were unheard of. Not only were they strictly forbidden by Soviet authorities, but the fear wrought by decades of repression seemed to make oppositional collective action very unlikely. While pockets of resistance and individual dissident efforts dotted the Soviet historical map, the masses were docile, going out on to the streets only in response to compulsory parades and marches designed to commemorate holidays like May Day. In 1986, a policy of greater openness in society, glasnost', was initiated by the new Secretary General of the Communist Party of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev. Among the changes brought about by glasnost' was a greater tolerance by authorities of open expression in society, though this too was limited, as the policy was intended to strengthen rather than weaken the union.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Flag Act Passed 23 March 2005 (RT 1 I 2005, 20, 126), Entered Into Force 1 January 2006
    Estonian Flag Act Passed 23 March 2005 (RT 1 I 2005, 20, 126), entered into force 1 January 2006. § 1. Estonian flag (1) The Estonian flag is blue, black and white. (2) The Estonian flag is used as the national and state flag. § 2. Description of Estonian flag (1) The Estonian flag is made up of three horizontal bands of colour of equal width. The upper band is blue, the middle one is black and the lower one is white. The ratio of the length and width of the flag is 7:11. (2) The image of the Estonian flag is annexed to this Act. § 3. Hoisting Estonian flag to Pikk Hermann tower (1) The Estonian flag is hoisted to the Pikk Hermann tower in Tallinn every day at sunrise but not earlier than at 7.00 and is lowered at sunset. (2) On the hoisting of the Estonian flag to the Pikk Hermann tower, the opening phrases of the national anthem of Estonia and on the lowering, the opening phrases of the song “ Mu isamaa armas ” [“My Dear Fatherland”], are used as musical signature. § 4. Right to hoist and use Estonian flag (1) Everyone has the right to hoist and use the Estonian flag in accordance with the provisions of this Act and good practice. (2) On Independence Day, Victory Day and Day of Restoration of Independence, the Estonian flag shall be hoisted on residential buildings, business buildings and office buildings. § 5. Hoisting of Estonian flag permanently (1) The Estonian flag shall not be lowered on the building of the Riigikogu, the Government of the Republic, the Supreme Court, court buildings, the building of the State Audit Office, the Chancellor of Justice, the buildings of ministries, the building of Eesti Pank, the buildings of county governments, rural municipality or city councils, rural municipality governments or city governments and at border checkpoints.
    [Show full text]