DOCSLIB.ORG

LATVIA in the EUROPEAN UNION: a VISION and “TO DO” LIST for the YEARS to COME—2019, a YEAR of CHANGES on ALL FRONTS Vita Tērauda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LATVIA in the EUROPEAN UNION: a VISION and “TO DO” LIST for the YEARS to COME—2019, a YEAR of CHANGES on ALL FRONTS Vita Tērauda 9 Supported by: In cooperation with: The Latvian Foreign and Security Policy Yearbook 2019 aims to contribute to the understanding of Latvia’s foreign and security policy decisions and considerations in 2018, as well as assess the opportunities and concerns that await Latvia in 2019. During the past year Latvia saw considerable improvements in its security situation, while simultaneously met with new international and regional challenges. 2019 promises to be a similarly dynamic year full of opportunities and challenges. Latvia will have to make brave and strong choices in its foreign and security policy. Supported by: The Parliament of the Republic of Latvia and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia In cooperation with: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Editors: Andris Sprūds, Elizabete Vizgunova, Sintija Broka Authors: Māris Andžāns, Reinis Āboltiņš, Una Aleksandra Bērziņa-Čerenkova, Sintija Broka, Lolita Čigāne, Justīne Elferte, Ilze Garoza, Vineta Kleinberga, Ojārs Ēriks Kalniņš, Andis Kudors, Rihards Kols, Imants Lieģis, Gunta Pastore, Diāna Potjomkina, Edgars Rinkēvičs, Toms Rostoks, Ojārs Skudra, Andris Sprūds, Otto Tabuns, Vita Tērauda, Everita Nensija Trankale, Elizabete Vizgunova. Project coordinators: Elizabete Vizgunova, Sintija Broka The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Parliament of the Republic of Latvia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia or Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung or represent the opinion of any government authority or ministry. Translation from Latvian: Una Aleksandra Bērziņa-Čerenkova, Līvija Uskale, Reinis Āboltiņš, Ieva Raudsepa English language editor: Talis Saule Archdeacon Layout: Oskars Stalidzāns Cover design: Kristīne Plūksna-Zvagule This book is published in collaboration with the Publishers “Hansa Print Riga” © Authors of the articles, 2019 © Translation: Una Aleksandra Bērziņa-Čerenkova, Līvija Uskale, Reinis Āboltiņš, Ieva Raudsepa, 2019 ISBN 978-9934-567-32-2 © Layout: Oskars Stalidzāns, 2019 UDK 327(474.3) © Cover design: Kristīne Plūksna-Zvagule, 2019 La 801 © Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Andris Sprūds . 5 ADDRESS BY THE MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Edgars Rinkēvičs ............................................................. 7 FOREIGN POLICY—THE GUARANTOR OF LATVIAN INDEPENDENCE Rihards Kols ................................................................. 11 LATVIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: A VISION AND “TO DO” LIST FOR THE YEARS TO COME—2019, A YEAR OF CHANGES ON ALL FRONTS Vita Tērauda ................................................................ 18 LATVIAN FOREIGN POLICY AT 100: FROM ROOTS TO BRANCHES Ojārs Ēriks Kalniņš ........................................................... 23 THE EU: MUDDLING THROUGH Lolita Čigāne ................................................................ 31 THE NATIONAL INTERESTS OF LATVIA IN A GEOPOLITICAL AND GEOECONOMIC CONTEXT Ojārs Skudra ................................................................ 43 SUNSHINE AND THUNDER IN LATVIA’S FOREIGN POLICY Imants Lieģis ................................................................ 66 THROUGH RESTLESS WINDS: LATVIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION IN 2018 AND 2019 Vineta Kleinberga ........................................................... 76 LATVIA’S DEFENCE IN 2018. MORE MONEY— MORE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES Māris Andžāns .............................................................. 96 BUILDING DETERRENCE INTERNALLLY AND EXTERNALLY: IS LATVIA CAPABLE OF BECOMING DAVID? Toms Rostoks .............................................................. 109 LATVIA AND THE US: PRECARIOUS STABILITY? Diāna Potjomkina, Justīne Elferte .............................................123 LATVIA AND RUSSIA: PHYSICALLY NEAR, FAR APART IN THOUGHTS Andis Kudors ............................................................... 138 LATVIA’S “CHINA POLICY” AND THE ROLE OF THE “16+1” Una Aleksandra Bērziņa-Čerenkova ........................................... 152 POSITIVE DYNAMICS IN CENTRAL ASIA— OPPORTUNITIES FOR LATVIA? Gunta Pastore .............................................................. 158 LATVIA AND THE GULF REGION: CHOOSING BETWEEN INTERESTS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND PRINCIPLES? Sintija Broka, Everita Nensija Trankale ......................................... 169 THE THREE SEAS INITIATIVE AND LATVIA: AN ATTEMPT TO SPLIT EUROPE OR TO COMPLEMENT IT? Elizabete Vizgunova ........................................................ 181 CHANGES IN THE ENERGY SECTOR: TO BE CONTINUED Reinis Āboltiņš .............................................................196 THE MOBILISATION AND POLITICISATION OF LATVIAN DIASPORA AND REDEFINING LATVIAN DIASPORA POLICY Ilze Garoza ................................................................. 205 LATVIA’S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY— THE BEST “SELFIE” FOR THE NEXT CENTENARY Otto Tabuns ............................................................... 219 CONTRIBUTORS........................................................ 233 FOREWORD Andris Sprūds, Director of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Professor at Riga Stradiņš University In this year’s Latvian Foreign and Security Policy Yearbook, the Latvian Institute of International Affairs continues to examine Latvia’s international challenges and choices, to inform society of these, and to issue recommendations for foreign policy shapers and decision-makers. This publication analyses the events and decisions of 2018 and attempts to outline Latvian foreign and security policy scenarios and recommendations for 2019. The past year has brought several major challenges to the international system. Within the European Union, the Brexit process is underway, the outcomes and consequences of which remain to be seen. Differences between EU member states have also arisen, despite hopes that the wave of populism might slow down after the 2017 elections in Germany and France. The international rhetoric and policy of the president of the US, Donald Trump, add a certain level of unpredictability to the system. At the same time, the US has stuck to its commitments to strengthen security on the eastern flank of NATO. Possibly the most important lesson that can be drawn from the conclusions of the authors and editors of this volume is that none of the current principles of the Euroatlantic alliance are self-evident, and a continuous fight for the fulfilment of those principles is necessary. The ambitions of other great powers, primarily Russia and China, to play a bigger role in regional and international processes are also evident. The goal of the yearbook is to examine Latvia’s view of the changing international environment, as well as of outside threats, security promotion activities, relations with neighbouring states, migration, and major infrastructure projects. Despite the changing nature of the international order, throughout its history Latvia has been characterised by its geographical position at the intersection of great powers—the interests of which Latvia has attempted to address by political and diplomatic means. It has to be pointed out that if this publication were to be compared with an analogous yearbook from another EU or NATO member state, it would become clear that perceptions of threats, friends, and challenges are often quite different across member states. The external and internal challenges that Latvia will have to face in the future will require developing long-term strategies in all nationally significant sectors, as well 5 as establishing a stable economic, political, and security environment. Only in such an environment it is possible to foster a resilient and cohesive society—a society able to overcome asymmetric attempts to destabilise and divide it. It is with this hope that the team at the Latvian Institute of International Affairs enters the second centenary of Latvia: hope that our country will have the conviction to continue to pursue a proactive, Euroatlantic-centred, and effective foreign and defence policy. Partnership and cooperation are crucial for the ability to reach a successful outcome. The 2019 yearbook reflects the importance of cooperation—the book has benefited immensely from the desire of our Latvian experts to share their opinions and recommendations. We are grateful for the support of the Saeima—and especially the Foreign Affairs Committee and the European Affairs Committee, for their significant contribution to foreign affairs research and awareness building. The support given by the Saeima has permitted us to prepare this publication in two languages, as well as to organise several regional debates including Saeima representatives, with the goal of informing the general public of different opinions and positions on important foreign affairs issues. The LIIA has a productive mutual cooperation agreement with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that allows us to form a bridge between policy-makers and think-tanks. Also, the long-standing and generous support provided by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation has been irreplaceable. The foundation has yet again demonstrated its commitment to the promotion of intellectual discussions and the exchange of opinions on both national and international levels, providing indispensable input into an informed discussion between decision-makers, experts, and the wider Latvian society. Lastly, we would like to thank our readers, who are interested in understanding the challenges and perspectives
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contents NDPHS Continues Efforts to Have Health Prioritised on The
    Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health A partnership committed to and Social Well-being achieving tangible results e-Newsletter Issue 1/2012 Contents Dear Reader… NDPHS Continues Efforts to It is widely recognised that health is crucial in the context of the ageing Have Health Prioritised on society and challenges posed to sustainable economic development. Yet, the Regional Agenda 1 the importance of health is not properly reflected on the regional coopera- tion agenda. One example is the Action Plan of the EU Strategy for the Baltic The Demography Challenge Sea Region (EUSBSR), where health has been listed as a sub-priority. Since in the Baltic Sea Region 2 last year our Partnership has taken several actions to address this problem Making Success Stories and our efforts will continue. This issue of our e-newsletter will give you with Russian Partners 4 some details on this. Following the above is an article about the 9th Baltic Sea States Summit rd 3 EUSBSR Annual Forum held in May 2012 in Stralsund, Germany and, more specifically, its plenary Discusses the Review of the session on the impact of demographic change. The Prime Ministers had Strategy Action Plan 5 a stimulating debate on main challenges posed by the demographic change PrimCareIT: Counteracting and discussed policies to induce win-win situations for the future. Brain Drain and Professional You will also find two articles about the 3rd Annual Forum of the EU Strat- Isolation of Health 6 egy for the Baltic Sea Region held a few days ago in Denmark. Many interest- ing events took place during it, which provided an opportunity to discuss the progress so far and the way forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report the PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY of the MEDITERRANEAN
    PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN ASSEMBLEE PARLEMENTAIRE DE LA MEDITERRANEE اﻟﺠﻤﻌﻴﺔ اﻟﺒﺮﻟﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺮ اﻷﺑﻴﺾ اﻟﻤﺘﻮﺳﻂ a v n a C © 2020 Annual Report THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN The Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean (PAM) is an international organization, which brings together 34 member parliaments from the Euro-Mediterranean and Gulf regions to discuss the most pressing common challenges, such as regional conflicts, security and counterterrorism, humanitarian crises, economic integration, climate change, mass migrations, education, human rights and inter-faith dialogue. Through this unique political forum, PAM Parliaments are able to engage in productive discussions, share legislative experience, and work together towards constructive solutions. a v n 2 a C © CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 14TH PLENARY SESSION 6 REPORT OF ACTIVITIES 9 1ST STANDING COMMITTEE - POLITICAL AND SECURITY-RELATED COOPERATION 11 2ND STANDING COMMITTEE - ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 16 3RD STANDING COMMITTEE - DIALOGUE AMONG CIVILIZATIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS 21 KEY EVENTS 2020 28 PAM 2020 DOCUMENTS – QUICK ACCESS LINKS 30 PAM AWARDS 2020 33 MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL REMARKS 36 FINANCIAL REPORT 39 CALENDAR 2020 49 PRELIMINARY CALENDAR 2021 60 3 a v n a C © FOREWORD Hon. Karim Darwish President of PAM Dear Colleagues and friends, It has been a privilege and an honor to act as the President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean in 2020. As this year draws to a close, I would like to reiterate my deep gratitude to all PAM delegates and their National Parliaments, the PAM Secretariat and our partner organizations for their great work and unwavering support during a time when our region Honorable Karim Darwish, President of PAM and the world face a complex array of challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredrik Reinfeldt
    2014 Press release 03 June 2014 Prime Minister's Office REMINDER: German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte to Harpsund On Monday and Tuesday 9-10 June, Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt will host a high-level meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte at Harpsund. The European Union needs to improve job creation and growth now that the EU is gradually recovering from the economic crisis. At the same time, the EU is facing institutional changes with a new European Parliament and a new European Commission taking office in the autumn. Sweden, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands are all reform and growth-oriented countries. As far as Sweden is concerned, it will be important to emphasise structural reforms to boost EU competitiveness, strengthen the Single Market, increase trade relations and promote free movement. These issues will be at the centre of the discussions at Harpsund. Germany, the UK and the Netherlands, like Sweden, are on the World Economic Forum's list of the world's ten most competitive countries. It is natural, therefore, for these countries to come together to compare experiences and discuss EU reform. Programme points: Monday 9 June 18.30 Chancellor Merkel, PM Cameron and PM Rutte arrive at Harpsund; outdoor photo opportunity/door step. Tuesday 10 June 10.30 Joint concluding press conference. Possible further photo opportunities will be announced later. Accreditation is required through the MFA International Press Centre. Applications close on 4 June at 18.00.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia Towards Europe: Internal Security Issues
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization Andris Runcis LATVIA TOWARDS EUROPE: INTERNAL SECURITY ISSUES Final Report The preparation of this Report was made possible through a NATO Award. Rîga, 1999 1 Content Introduction 3 1. The basic aspects of a country’s security 5 2. Latvia’s security concept 8 3. Corruption 10 4. Unemployment 17 5. Non-governmental organizations 19 6. The Latvian banking system and its crisis 27 7. Citizenship issue 32 Conclusion 46 Appendix 48 2 Introduction The security of small countries has been a difficult problem since ancient times. Now, when the Cold War has ended and Europe has moved from a bipolar to a multipolar system, when the communist system in Eastern Europe has collapsed and the Soviet empire has disintegrated – processes which have led to the appearance of a series of new and mostly small countries in Europe – we are witnessing a renaissance of small countries in the international arena. Since regaining independence Latvia’s general foreign policy orientation has been associated with integration into European economic, political and military structures where full membership in the European Union (EU) is the cornerstone. The issue has been one of the most consolidated and undisputed on the country’s political agenda. Latvian politicians have stressed the country’s wish to become a member state of the European Union. On October 14, 1995, all political parties represented in the Parliament supported the State President’s proposed Declaration on the Policy of Latvian Integration in the European Union. On October 27, Latvia submitted its application for membership to the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse
    Auers, Daunis, and Andres Kasekamp. "Comparing Radical-Right Populism in Estonia and Latvia." Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. Ed. Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitte Mral. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. 235–248. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 1 Oct. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472544940.ch-016>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 1 October 2021, 14:25 UTC. Copyright © Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik and Brigitte Mral and the contributors 2013. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 16 Comparing Radical-Right Populism in Estonia and Latvia Daunis Auers and Andres Kasekamp Introduction 2011 saw sharply contrasting parliamentary elections in neighbouring Estonia and Latvia. The 6 March 2011 poll in Estonia was the first election in post-communist Europe to feature an unchanged line-up of competing political parties, indicating a high level of political stability despite the financial and political turmoil that marked much of Europe in 2011 (Pettai et al. 2011). In contrast, the same year Latvia experienced its first early election, triggered by a referendum, on the recall of Parliament, called by the Latvian president in protest to a perceived ‘privatization of democracy in Latvia’ (Zatlers 2011). Moreover, the radical-right populist Visu Latvijai!/Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK (National Alliance of All for Latvia!/For Fatherland and Freedom/ Latvian National Independence Movement) almost doubled its share of the votes it won in the October 2010 regular election, and then subsequently took up government office in a new three-party coalition.
    [Show full text]
  • SWEDEN Aras Lindh
    ★ SWEDEN Aras Lindh Mind Rather Than Heart in EU Politics Highlights ★ The Swedish decision to enter the EU was not based so much on the hope of gaining March 2016 March something, but rather on the fear of being left out if it did not. It was probably the desire for a ‘negative safety’ that made the Swedes vote in favour of the EU as the alternative cost would probably have been too high. ★ Many think that their cutting-edge welfare system and high living standards could be lost as a result of deeper EU integration. This hesitancy towards the EU explains a relative knowledge discrepancy on the EU in the country. Overall, Sweden displays both a degree of satisfaction with its current level of integration (especially its non-membership to the Eurozone) and a diffuse euroscepticism across the society. ★ To strengthen the EU’s image in Sweden requires concrete projects, rather than abstract symbols. A stronger Common European Asylum System would be a prime example of such a project. Overall, any policy from the EU which would positively affect Swedes could decrease scepticism. BUILDING BRIDGES SERIES PAPER Building Bridges project This paper is part of the Building Bridges Paper Series. The series looks at how the Member States perceive the EU and what they expect from it. It is composed of 28 contributions, one from each Member State. The publications aim to be both analytical and educational in order to be available to a wider public. All the contributions and the full volume The European Union in The Fog are available here.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Soes.Pdf
    Public Report on the State-Owned Enterprises and Shares in 2014 Cross-Sectoral Coordination Centre Riga 2015 2 Public Report regarding the State-Owned Capital Companies and Capital Shares Table of contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................3 Financial summary about the fi nancial indicators of use of state capital .............................................................................4 Methodology and abbreviations used in the report ............................................................................................................6 Overview of the sectors Energy.....................................................................................................................................................................7 Forestry and agriculture ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Transport and logistics .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Communications ...................................................................................................................................................27 Real estate ............................................................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • A Nordic Model for Scotland?
    A NORDIC MODEL FOR SCOTLAND? Scottish-UK relations after independence Nicola McEwen ESRC Senior Scotland Fellow University of Edinburgh KEY POINTS . Existing UK intergovernmental forums would be insufficient to manage Scottish-rUK intergovernmental relations if the Scottish government’s independence vision was realised. The Nordic example illustrates that intergovernmental cooperation, formal and informal, between neighbouring sovereign states is commonplace in many policy areas. Formal cooperation is most evident where it produces clear ‘added value’ for each party. Formal structures of intergovernmental cooperation nurture policy learning and encourage the networking that facilitates informal cooperation, but senior official and ministerial buy-in can be difficult to secure. European integration has limited the incentive for separate Nordic cooperation initiatives, though Nordic governments continue to cooperate over the implementation of EU directives. The Nordic countries do not usually act as a cohesive regional bloc in the EU – national interests prevail. Intergovernmental coordination among the Nordic countries offers useful insights for Scottish- rUK relations in the event of independence, but the Nordic Council and Nordic Council of Ministers offer limited opportunities for an independent Scotland, either for direct engagement or as a model for Scottish-rUK cooperation. ***** INDEPENDENCE AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS For the Scottish government and Yes Scotland, independence would mark a new ‘partnership of equals’ between the nations of these islands. The independence vision, set out in the White Paper, Scotland’s Future, incorporates a variety of proposals for sharing institutional assets and services with the rest of the UK. These include, for example: . Sterling currency union . Research Councils UK . Joint venture between a Scottish Broadcasting .
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia Country Report
    m o c 50 km . s p m a o m c 50 km - 30 mi . d s p © a m - 30 mi d © Valmiera Ventspils Cē sis Talsi Gulbene Sigulda Jū rmala Kuldī ga Tukums Riga Salaspils Madona Olaine Ogre Saldus Dobele Jelgava Liepā ja Jē kabpils Rē zekne Bauska Krā slava Republic of Latvia Daugavpils Country Report Table of contents: Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Latvia’s transition to a Western-style political and economic model since regaining its independence in 1991 culminated in its 2004 accession to the EU and NATO. Overcoming an initial dependence on Russia, and various crises in the 1990s, Latvia has shown impressive economic growth since 2000. Read more. History ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Latvia lies between its fellow Baltic states of Estonia and Lithuania, with Belarus and Russia to the east. The USSR annexed the country in 1940 and the Nazis occupied it during World War II. Up to 95% of the country’s Jewish population perished in the Holocaust. Read more. Domestic Situation .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Latvia is a stable parliamentary democracy ranked as “free” by Freedom House. Its constitution guarantees basic civil liberties that the government recognizes in practice. The
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the 133Rd Assembly and Related
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Meetings and other activities 133rd Assembly 1. Opening of the Assembly .................................................................................................... 4 2. Participation ......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Choice of an emergency item .............................................................................................. 5 4. Debates and decisions of the Assembly and its Standing Committees .............................. 6 5. Concluding sitting ................................................................................................................ 12 197th session of the Governing Council 1. Membership and Permanent Observers of the IPU ............................................................ 12 2. Financial situation of the IPU ............................................................................................... 13 3. Programme and budget for 2016 ........................................................................................ 13 4. Cooperation with the United Nations system ...................................................................... 13 5. Implementation of the IPU Strategy for 2012-2017 ............................................................. 14 6. Recent specialized meetings ............................................................................................... 15 7. Reports of plenary bodies and specialized committees .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tradition and Symbolism of the Song and Dance Celebration Process in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania “
    Multinational Candidature File for the 2nd Proclamation of Masterpieces of the Oral and Intagible Heritage of Humanity “Tradition and Symbolism of the Song and Dance Celebration Process in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania “ Content 1. IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................ 2 a. Group of Member States .................................................................................................... 2 b. Name of the form of cultural expression ............................................................................ 2 c. Name of the communities .................................................................................................... 2 d. Geographic location ........................................................................................................... 2 e. Frequency of this form of cultural expression .................................................................... 3 f. Persons and organizations responsible .............................................................................. 3 g. Co-ordinator ....................................................................................................................... 4 2. DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................... 5 a. Description of the form of cultural expression .................................................................. 5 b. History, development and social, symbolic and
    [Show full text]