Heritage Statement: John Davies Primary School, Huthwaite MCA 06
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
!"#$%&'"()%&%"*"+%,( !"#$%&'()*+%,-).'-/%01#""23%456#7')6*% % ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 1 -./(01203456((((3+7(7#&8%( ( (((((((((((((((( (((/9#$:(305; Heritage Statement: John Davies Primary School, Huthwaite Heritage Appraisal CONTENTS John Davies Primary School Introduction 3 Huthwaite Site location and existing land use 3 Nottinghamshire Methodology 4 By Approach and data collection 4 Limitations 4 Assessment Criteria 4 Clare Herring, BA; MA Cantab Individual significance & importance 5 & Group significance 5 Setting 6 Archaeological potential 7 Simon Johnson, BA; PG. Dip; FRSA; FSA Scot; IHBC; MIFA Archaeological & historic background 7 Prehistoric 7 Prepared on behalf of Roman 7 Saxon/medieval 7 Bowmer & Kirkland Post-medieval/Industrial 8 Cartographic evidence 9 Built heritage and character 12 Overview 12 The Site 13 General arrangement 12 Construction overview 12 The Barn 12 The Main Bloc 14 The School Interior 19 Assessment 26 Buried remains 26 Standing remains 26 Setting issues 28 Summary and recommendations 28 References& Sources Consulted 28 2 MCA 06-02/17 2nd draft April 2014 !"#$%&'"()%&%"*"+%,( !"#$%&'()*+%,-).'-/%01#""23%456#7')6*% % GDEQCST.EGCD(( 5)5 3<'%& ( D)-+5! -*1#-G*G! )%! NP[I! 5$*! C2'1*! %'.*! -*H2*15+! 5$*! 5#C#8-'C$/! #H! 5$*! ()22'8*! '%G! )5+! +4--#4%G)%8+O!! !)@7'4#C#D%4E(+,-# 345$6')5*!)+!G*-)(*G!H-#.!`2G!T%82)+$!aZ !.*'%)%8!$)22!+C4-!'%G! ^ !.*'%)%8!12*'-)%8:!5$4+!]'! J$)+!G#14.*%5!$'+!?**%!C-*C'-*G!#%!5$*!?*$'2H!#H! !5#!)%H#-.!1#%+)G*-'5)#%!#H!'%/! 12*'-)%8!#%!'!$)22!+C4-_B !!! $*-)5'8*! ).C2)1'5)#%+! #H! C-#C#+*G! G*.#2)5)#%! #H! 5$*! *R)+5)%8! "#$%! &'()*+! ,-).'-/! 01$##2! ?4)2G)%8+! ! 345$6')5*! +5'%G+! #%! 5$*! 1#.C2*R:! 2#6*-! 2/)%8! 1#'2! .*'+4-*+! 6$)1$! -4%! H-#.! 5$*! 0#45$! b#-S+$)-*!5$ '%G!5$*)-!-*C2'1*.*%5!6)5$!%*6!+1$##2!?4)2G)%8+!5$'5!6)22!C-#()G*!H'1)2)5)*+!?*55*-!+4)5*G!5#!.#G*-%!N *G41'5)#%'2!%**G+B ! ?#-G*-!+#45$6'-G+!5$-#48$!%#-5$!*'+5!&*-?/+$)-*!'%G!6*+5!7#55)%8$'.+$)-*B!<5!5$*!+5'-5!#H!5$*!NX ! ! 1*%54-/!5$*!C#C42'5)#%!6'+!#%2/!+#.*!PQQ!?45!6)5$!5$*!#C*%)%8!#H!341S%'22!9#22)*-/!5$*!C#C42'5)#%! F5!$'+!?**%!C-#G41*G!6)5$!-*8'-G!5#!14--*%5!?*+5!C-'15)1*!'%G!)+!?'+*G!#%!*.C)-)1!+)5*!#?+*-('5)#%+! $'G!c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`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lanning Application 4/V/2015/0159 3 ( 3 !!TS6'22!NXWQ=!A*22)%8!@!9#2*!ZQQQ -./(01203456((((3+7(7#&8%( ( ((((((((((((((((73TE!>ZVVP (((/9#$:(305; Heritage Statement: John Davies Primary School, Huthwaite METHODOLOGY The report includes coloured plates and panoramas from photographs taken during the walkover This assessment has been researched and written by Clare Herring and Simon Johnson in accordance survey. Most photographs were taken from public vantage points such as the highway or local with common practice and the appropriate national guideline Standard and Guidance for footpaths whilst some are from private land and taken with the land-owners permission. Archaeological Desk-Based Assessments.4 This report presents a summary of the archaeological and historical background of the site followed The approach taken has been developed in response to the direction of government planning policy by an as-existing baseline description of the site and its immediate environs before an assessment of and the resultant evolution in current best archaeological practice that takes account of such changes significance and impact is discussed. in both policy and guidance produced by professional bodies and English Heritage. The historical and archaeological background is not intended to be exhaustive: it is a summary derived primarily from secondary sources written to give the baseline conditions and assessment a historical context and chronology proportionate to the significance of individual assets and the Approach and data collection potential impact posed by developed sensu NPPF para. 128. This document comprises a desk-based collection and analysis of published and archival material together with a site visit and walk-over survey of the proposed development area and its Limitations surroundings. This document includes discussion of the significance of individual heritage assets and other aspects A detailed documentary and cartographic search was undertaken in detail for c. 1km radius of the of the built and buried heritage of the area in and around the hamlet. Much of this area is in private site, with data from further afield included where considered relevant to the site. Local, regional and ownership and not readily accessible or, in the case of buried remains, has not been subject to any national archives and collections were examined for relevant historical information, both published systematic investigation or full publication. Whilst it is therefore not possible to fully establish the and un-published, from the following sources: significance of individual heritage assets, it is possible to establish this in purely visual terms to model the potential impact of the proposed development. • National Monuments Record (NMR) Historic Environment Record (NHER) • Enquiries were made to the heritage team of Nottinghamshire County Council in order to consult with • Nottinghamshire Record Office them regarding their preferred detailed assessment expectations and to be made aware of any • Nottingham Library relevant information not currently within the public domain. The buried archaeological potential of • Sutton in Ashfield Library the site and possible future evaluation was discussed with the Archaeology section but no response • www. magic.gov.uk was received from the Conservation section. • www.heritage-gateway.org.uk • www.genuki.org.uk At the time of researching the report, the Nottinghamshire Record Office was closed and records were • [email protected] only accessible by pre-ordering with long lead-times. At the time of writing, Mayfield still have not • http://www.archiuk.com received copies of the Enclosure Map and thus this assessment has not been able to consider it. This is not, however, considered a major constraint since such maps rarely show any structures that may have left buried remains and the existing site buildings post-date its survey. The walkover-survey was undertaken on 3 March 2015. The purpose was to check for visual references to recorded information and to identify any previously un-recorded heritage features that were visible. Account was taken of the nature of the present ground conditions to determine suitable Assessment Criteria field survey techniques should further evaluation be deemed necessary. Account was also taken of the immediate context of the site, the wider locality and any additional individual heritage assets to The baseline descriptions are considered in the light of the following assessment criteria to establish, inform analysis and assessment of setting issues.