King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Highline Community College Building 8, Student Union Building 2400 S
Highline Community College Building 8, Student Union Building 2400 S. 240th Street Des Moines, WA 98198 Schedule 2:15 pm Welcome and Introduction, SeaTac Municipal Court Judge Elizabeth Bejarano; 2:20 pm Mia Gregerson, House Representative and Mayor, City of SeaTac; Dave Kaplan, Mayor, City of Des Moines; Des Moines Municipal Court Judge Veronica Alicea- Galvan 2:45 pm Comedian John Keister 3:15 pm Judge James Docter, City of Bremerton 3:30 pm Recording Artist Wanz 3:40 pm Dan Satterberg, King County Prosecuting Attorney 4:00 pm Katie Whittier, King County Director for Senator Patty Murray, on behalf of Patty Murray 4:15 pm Comedian Ty Barnett 4:45 pm Norm Rice, President and CEO of the Seattle Foundation, and Former Seattle Mayor 5:00 pm Closing remarks (Schedule subject to change as entertainers are added) Speaker and Entertainer Information Speakers Mia Gregerson http://housedemocrats.wa.gov/roster/rep-mia-gregerson/ http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/index.aspx?page=90 Before being appointed to the House of Representatives in 2013, and selected as Mayor of the City of SeaTac in 2014, Mia served as a council member and deputy mayor for the City of SeaTac. While on the council she served on the executive board of the Puget Sound Regional Council, on the board of directors for Sound Cities Association and on other regional committees. Mia has been a surgical assistant and business manager in the dental field for more than 16 years. She has degrees from Highline Community college and the University of Washington. Dan Satterberg http://www.kingcounty.gov/Prosecutor.aspx A Seattle area native, Dan is a graduate of Highline High school, the University of Washington, and the University of Washington Law School. -
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That on Tuesday, August 17, 2010, in King County, State of Washington, There Will Be Held Primary and Sp
Department of Elections notice of election Sherril Huff, Director NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, August 17, 2010, in King County, State of Washington, there will be held primary and special elections conducted entirely by mail for the purpose of nominating candidates for the offices listed below and submitting to the voters for their approval or rejection the ballot measures as listed. The names and addresses of candidates and the offices for which they have filed are listed below. Dated at Tukwila, Washington this 28th day of July, 2010. Federal John Carmack Roy Olson Jackie Moore State Representative State Representative State Representative State Representative State Senator Court of Appeals, Division No. 1, School (Prefers Republican Party) (Prefers Green Party) (States No Party Preference) Legislative Dist No. 31 - Position 2 Legislative Dist No. 34 - Position 1 Legislative Dist No. 39 - Position 1 Legislative Dist No. 45 - Position 1 Legislative Dist No. 48 District No. 1 About the General Delivery PO BOX 2695 17701 108TH AVE SE #455 United States Senator Bellingham, WA 98225 Olympia, WA 98507 Renton, WA 98055 partisan office partisan office partisan office partisan office partisan office Judge Position No. 2 Riverview School District No. 407 partisan office 423-946-7003 [email protected] 425-495-1249 Patrick Reed Eileen L. Cody Eleanor Walters Roger Goodman Rodney Tom unexpired 1-year term, nonpartisan office Proposition No. 1 2010 Washington Primary Election [email protected] [email protected] Norma D. Gruber Adam Smith (Prefers Republican Party) (Prefers Democratic Party) (Prefers Democratic Party) (Prefers Democratic Party) (Prefers Democratic Party) Michael Spearman Supplemental Educational Programs (Prefers Republican Party) Larry Kalb (Prefers Democratic Party) John Potter 16622 88TH ST E 6714 38TH AVE SW PO BOX 2022 218 Main Street, PMB 763 P.O. -
Telephone Committee
63RD WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE TELEPHONE DIRECTORY & COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS 2014 Legislative Hotline & ADA Information Telephone Directory and Committee Assignments of the Washington State Legislature Sixty–Third Legislature 2014 Regular Session Washington State Senate Brad Owen . President of the Senate Tim Sheldon . President Pro Tempore Sharon Brown . Vice President Pro Tempore Hunter G . Goodman . .. Secretary of the Senate Brad Hendrickson . Deputy Secretary of the Senate Washington House of Representatives Frank Chopp . Speaker Jim Moeller . Speaker Pro Tempore Tina Orwall . Deputy Speaker Pro Tempore Barbara Baker . .. Chief Clerk Bernard Dean . Deputy Chief Clerk 63 rd Washington State Legislature 1 Members by District DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 14 Sen . Rosemary McAuliffe, D Sen . Curtis King, R Rep . Derek Stanford, D Rep . Norm Johnson, R Rep . Luis Moscoso, D Rep . Charles R . Ross, R DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 15 Sen . Randi Becker, R Sen . Jim Honeyford, R Rep . Graham Hunt, R Rep . Bruce Chandler, R Rep . J T. Wilcox, R Rep . David Taylor, R DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 16 Sen . Andy Billig, D Sen . Mike Hewitt, R Rep . Marcus Riccelli, D Rep . Maureen Walsh, R Rep . Timm Ormsby, D Rep . Terry Nealey, R DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 17 Sen . Mike Padden, R Sen . Don Benton, R Rep . Leonard Christian, R Rep . Monica Stonier, D Rep . Matt Shea, R Rep . Paul Harris, R DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 18 Sen . Mark Mullet, D Sen . Ann Rivers, R Rep . Jay Rodne, R Rep . Brandon Vick, R Rep . Chad Magendanz, R Rep . Liz Pike, R DISTRICT 6 DISTRICT 19 Sen . Michael Baumgartner, R Sen . Brian Hatfield, D Rep . Kevin Parker, R Rep . Dean Takko, D Rep . -
Doe V. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech Abstract
Document1 5/17/2011 5:58 PM Chesa Boudin Publius and the Petition: Doe v. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech abstract. This Note argues that signatures on petitions intended for use in direct democracy processes such as ballot initiatives should be subject to public scrutiny and disclosure. They should not benefit from free speech protections allowing for anonymity. Signatures used in these proceedings should not be considered petitions or speech at all, but rather lawmaking. Through historical, doctrinal, and prudential analysis, this Note distinguishes between core First Amendment rights, which might include signatures on a general petition with no legislative implications or minority associational rights, and speech-like activity that forms part of the regulated lawmaking process. author. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2011; University of Oxford, M.Sc. 2006, 2004; Yale College, B.A. 2003. Special thanks to Professor Akhil Amar for his guidance and feedback throughout the research and writing of this Note. I am grateful to Cyrus Habib, whose work in, and familiarity with, this area of the law first exposed me to this research topic. Thanks also to Caitlin O’Brien and the rest of the editorial staff at The Yale Law Journal . 2140 publius and the petition note contents introduction 2142 i. doe v. reed: anonymous speech versus lawmaking in practice 2145 ii. the history of anonymous speech 2150 A. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Speech 2152 B. Historical Practice: Public Politics and Disclosure 2157 iii. anonymous speech and disclosure doctrine 2164 A. Anonymous Speech Doctrine: Talley and McIntyre 2164 B. Disclosure Doctrine 2169 iv. -
CYRUS HABIB "Nothing Was Impossible" by Bob Young Cyrus Habib "Nothing Was Impossible"
CYRUS HABIB "Nothing Was Impossible" By Bob Young Cyrus Habib "Nothing Was Impossible" oing into junior high school, Kamyar Habib flirted with reinventing himself. It wouldn’t be the last time. He was a blind, cancer-surviving Iranian Amer- ican living in a Seattle suburb. And he was tired of kids making fun of his Gname by calling him “Caviar.” “You’re right, I’m a delicacy,” he’d snap back. Armored wit had become his first line of defense. He didn’t have a middle name, so he gave himself one, after a daring leader of ancient Persia, Cyrus the Great. He went by “K.C.” which added a hint of hipness to a bookish teenager who played jazz piano. By the time he got to New York City and Columbia University at 18, he was fully “Cyrus.” Debonair in designer clothes and sunglasses, he became a published photographer. “In New York you can be a new man,” Habib says, quoting the musi- cal “Hamilton.” He won a scholarship to Oxford, the oldest university in the English-speaking world, and aspired to be a literature professor. Then, he took a hard turn from aca- demia’s abstractions toward the corridors of power. He opted to become an attorney and headed to Yale, where he edited the law journal, while working, in his spare time, for Google in London and Goldman Sachs on Wall Street. In 2012, Habib veered into politics, after sizing up the current crop of office holders, and concluding, I can do that. Just four years later, he became Washington’s lieutenant governor, and the first Iranian American elected to a statewide office in the U.S. -
Publius and the Petition: Doe V
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL CHESA BOUDIN Publius and the Petition: Doe v. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech ABSTRACT. This Note argues that signatures on petitions intended for use in direct democracy processes such as ballot initiatives should be subject to public scrutiny and disclosure. They should not benefit from free speech protections allowing for anonymity. Signatures used in these proceedings should not be considered petitions or speech at all, but rather lawmaking. Through historical, doctrinal, and prudential analysis, this Note distinguishes between core First Amendment rights, which might include signatures on a general petition with no legislative implications or minority associational rights, and speech-like activity that forms part of the regulated lawmaking process. AUTHOR. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2011; University of Oxford, M.Sc. 2oo6, 2004; Yale College, B.A. 2003. Special thanks to Professor Akhil Amar for his guidance and feedback throughout the research and writing of this Note. I am grateful to Cyrus Habib, whose work in, and familiarity with, this area of the law first exposed me to this research topic. Thanks also to Caitlin O'Brien and the rest of the editorial staff at The Yale Law Journal. 2140 NOTE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2142 1. DOE V. REED: ANONYMOUS SPEECH VERSUS LAWMAKING IN PRACTICE 2145 II. THE HISTORY OF ANONYMOUS SPEECH 2150 A. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Speech 2152 B. Historical Practice: Public Politics and Disclosure 2157 III.ANONYMOUS SPEECH AND DISCLOSURE DOCTRINE 2164 A. Anonymous Speech Doctrine: Talley and McIntyre 2164 B. Disclosure Doctrine 2169 IV. PRUDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS 2175 A. State Regulation Can Promote Transparency and Deter Fraud 2176 B. -
General Election November3
VOTERS’ PAMPHLET Washington State Elections & Cowlitz County General Election November 3 2020 2020 Official Publication Ballots mailed to voters by October 16 (800) 448-4881 | sos.wa.gov 2 A message from Assistant Secretary of State Mark Neary On behalf of the Office of the Secretary of State, I am pleased to present the 2020 General Election Voters’ Pamphlet. We offer this comprehensive guide as a reference to help you find information on the candidates and statewide measures that appear on your ballot. This general election gives you the opportunity to have a say in our government at the local, state, and national levels, and to choose who will serve as our nation’s next president. In order to have your voice heard, you must be registered to vote. Voter registration forms that are mailed or completed online must be received by October 26, and we encourage you to check your registration information today at VoteWA.gov. If you are reading this message after October 26 and you are not registered, have moved since the last time you voted, or did not receive a ballot, you can go to your local elections office or voting center during regular business hours through 8 p.m. on Election Day to register to vote and receive a ballot. Once you have completed your ballot, you can send it via U.S. mail — no postage needed — but remember, all ballots must be postmarked by November 3. A late postmark could disqualify your ballot. The USPS recommends that you mail a week before Election Day. -
Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws. -
Uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66
University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Alumni Magazines Law School History and Publications Fall 2012 uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/alum Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation uwlaw, Fall 2012, Vol. 66, (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/alum/11 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School History and Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Alumni Magazines by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nonprofit Org US Postage 66 PAID L eaders for the Seattle, WA E Permit No. 62 M BOX 353020 SEATTLE, WA 98195-3020 U Global Common Good L 2012 VO 2012 L A F L uw uwlaw uwlaw CALENDAR FALL - WINTER - SPRING 2012 - 2013 law OCTOBER 29 FEBRUARY 8 M ARCH 29 – 30 Betts Patterson Mines T owards Global Food Law: 20th Annual NW Dispute Professor of Law Eric Schnapper, Transatlantic Competition and Resolution Conference FALL 2012 VOLUME 66 Installation & Reception Collaboration Conference A PRIL 24 N OVEMBER 1 FEBRUARY 22 NYC Alumni Breakfast Portland Alumni Reception TEI & UW Law Tax Conference A PRIL 25 N OVEMBER 7 Annual Public Interest Law DC Alumni Reception Senior Alumni Student Presentation Association Benefit Auction M AY 31 JA NUARY 11 – 13 & 26 – 27 FEBRUARY 27 Anchorage Alumni Reception Professional Mediation Skills Pendleton Miller Chair in Law Training Program Stewart Jay, Installation & Reception JUNE 9 UW School of Law Commencement JA NUARY 14 M ARCH 6 Garvey Schubert Barer Professor UW Law Foundation Professor Join us on LinkedIn (search for of Law Kathryn A. -
Pierce County Results
PRC_20141104_E November 4, 2014 Summary Report Pierce County Final Report Registration & Turnout 441,987 Voters U.S. Rep. - 8th Congressional (cont'd...) 135/135 100.00% Voter Turnout 220,827 49.96% Write-In 155 0.34% Total ... 220,827 49.96% Total ... 45,101 100.00% Initiative Measure No. 1351 506/506 100.00% U.S. Rep. - 9th Congressional 14/14 100.00% Under Votes: 6246 Under Votes: 304 Over Votes: 70 Over Votes: 1 Yes 110,997 51.74% -- - Adam Smith 3,629 59.62% No 103,514 48.26% -- - Doug Basler 2,445 40.17% Write-In 13 0.21% Total ... 214,511 100.00% Total ... 6,087 100.00% Initiative Measure No. 591 506/506 100.00% Under Votes: 5432 U.S. Rep. - 10th Congressional 242/242 100.00% Over Votes: 120 Under Votes: 4284 Over Votes: 34 Yes 109,536 50.88% No 105,739 49.12% -- - Denny Heck 49,348 50.03% -- - Joyce McDonald 48,965 49.65% Total ... 215,275 100.00% Write-In 315 0.32% Initiative Measure No. 594 506/506 100.00% Total ... 98,628 100.00% Under Votes: 3094 Over Votes: 43 State Rep. 2nd Legislative Pos. 1 52/52 100.00% Under Votes: 1419 Yes 117,641 54.04% No 100,049 45.96% Over Votes: 1 Total ... 217,690 100.00% -- - Graham Hunt 14,518 65.56% -- - Greg Hartman 7,543 34.06% Write-In 85 0.38% Advisory Vote No. 8 506/506 100.00% Under Votes: 19572 Total ... 22,146 100.00% Over Votes: 122 State Rep. -
2018 Gplex Seattle
2018 GPLEX SEATTLE Agenda 1 CONNECTING THE CITY OF BROTHERLY LOVE TO THE EMERALD CITY American Airlines is proud to support the Greater Philadelphia Leadership Exchange. 2 2018 GPLEX SEATTLE CONTENTS 4 WELCOME TO THE 2018 LEADERSHIP EXCHANGE 5 AGENDA 8 REGIONAL EXPLORATIONS 10 SPONSORS 12 ABOUT GREATER SEATTLE 14 By the Numbers 18 A Brief History 20 Population 22 Economy 24 Governance 26 Glossary of Seattle Terms 28 PLENARY SPEAKERS 44 LEADERSHIP DELEGATION 60 ABOUT THE ECONOMY LEAGUE 61 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 62 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 64 ESSENTIAL INFORMATION Agenda 3 WELCOME TO THE 2018 LEADERSHIP EXCHANGE I’m excited to be taking part in my fourth GPLEX—and my first as executive director! I was a GPLEX groupie long before I ever imagined I’d be leading this great organization. In any case, I am thrilled to spend a few days with all of you, the movers and shakers who make Greater Philadelphia, well, great. You are among the most diverse cohort we’ve assembled, across both social identity and sector. In GPLEX’s 13th year, we’re incredibly proud to count an alumni base of nearly 1,000 leaders. Stand tall GPLEXers! As always, the board and staff of the Economy League were very deliberate in choosing this year’s destination; we always seek regions that share similarities to our own in size, economy, etc. That said, Seattle is certainly different from Philadelphia. In 1860, while Philadelphia was one of the world’s largest and most economically vibrant cities, the “workshop of the world,” Seattle’s population was about 200 souls; 100 years later, Philadelphia hit its population peak of two million and then saw 50 years of population decline before the slow and steady growth of the late 1990s to the present. -
King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet
August 17, 2010 Primary and Special Election King County Official Local Voters’ Pamphlet Published by: For more information call 206-296-VOTE (8683) or visit King County www.kingcounty.gov/elections Elections 2 A letter from the Director 23 Fact or Fiction? After removal, you need to Fiction. The stub that is attached to your tear off and keep the stub that ballot is only used for inventory purposes is attached at the top of your prior to sending your ballot. You may ballot. remove and recycle it! A letter from Director of Elections has to count and Fiction. When you “write-in” a name report the votes for any name, on your ballot, per state law, that vote is Elections, Sherril Huff even a fictitious one, that recorded but not tallied as a vote for the appears on the “write-in” line of person you named unless they declared Dear King County Voter, voted ballots. themselves to be a write-in candidate and/ or the total number of write-in votes makes Like many people, I start my day with a a difference in the results of that race. steaming cup of coffee and a review of the Every voter’s signature is Fact. Per State law, Elections staff trained morning news. I take my coffee black and checked and verified for every in signature verification by the fraud division a bit on the strong side, and I enjoy my ballot cast. of the Washington State Patrol check every news the old fashioned way—with a paper single signature before a ballot is counted.