Arxiv:2101.02671V1 [Hep-Ph] 7 Jan 2021 2 Karplus and Neuman [2, 22–24], Proposals to Detect Photons Allows to Attain Εcm

Observing Light-by-Light Scattering in Vacuum with an Asymmetric Photon Collider

Maitreyi Sangal,1 Christoph H. Keitel,1 and Matteo Tamburini1, ∗ 1Max-Planck-Institut fürKernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany (Dated: January 8, 2021) Elastic scattering of two real photons is the most elusive of the fundamentally new processes predicted by quantum electrodynamics. This explains why, although first predicted more than eighty years ago, it has so far remained undetected. Here we show that in present day facilities elastic scattering of two real photons can become detectable far off axis in an asymmetric photon- photon collider setup. This may be obtained within one day operation time by colliding one millijoule XUV pulses with the broadband gamma-ray radiation generated in nonlinear Compton scattering of ultrarelativistic electron beams with terawatt-class optical laser pulses operating at 10 Hz repetition rate. In addition to the investigation of elastic photon-photon scattering, this technique allows to unveil or constrain new physics that could arise from the coupling of photons to yet undetected particles, therefore opening new avenues for searches of physics beyond the standard model.

In classical electrodynamics, light beams in vacuum served directly. To date, X-ray beam experiments could pass through each other unaffected [1]. However, in only place an upper bound on the photon-photon scat- the realm of QED photons in vacuum can scatter elasti- tering cross section [41]. cally via virtual electron-positron pairs [2]. This qualita- There exist two main challenges to detect elastic scat- tively new process has profound implications in cosmol- tering of real photons: (i) the smallness of the photon- ogy, where it results in a modified photon spectrum [3,4], photon scattering cross section; (ii) the fact that photons as well as in astrophysics, where photon-photon scatter- are identical particles such that, e.g., the backscattering ing can occur in the strongly polarized vacuum present of two photons colliding head-on is indistinguishable from in the magnetosphere of pulsars and magnetars [5–8]. the case of no scattering. For two colliding photon beams Notably, photon-photon scattering also plays a critical with finite angular spread, this implies that all the events role in searches of physics beyond the standard model. where both photons are scattered inside the opening an- In fact, due to its tiny cross section, precision measure- gle of the photon beams are undetectable. ments of any possible deviation of this process from QED Here we show that both the above challenges can be predictions could be evidence of new physics that could overcome in an asymmetric photon-photon collider setup arise from the coupling of photons to unknown weakly where a highly-collimated broadband gamma-ray beam interacting light particles such as axion-like particles, collides with an XUV pulse (see Fig.1). In fact, a sub- minicharged particles, magnetic monopoles or hidden stantial number of scattering events can be triggered by gauge bosons [9–15] (see also the recent reviews [16, 17]). requiring both that photon collisions occur at center of p Despite the very weak coupling, these exotic hypotheti- momentum (CM) energies εCM = εγ εω(1 − cos ϑ)/2 2 cal particles could play a key role in the evolution of the approaching mec , where the elastic photon-photon scat- Universe, and may lead to observable astrophysical and tering cross section σ is maximal [2], and that at least one cosmological effects such as matter-antimatter asymme- of the colliding beams has a large photon density. Here try [18] or the recent evidence of birefringence in cosmic εγ (εω) is the gamma (XUV) photon energy, ϑ the an- microwave background radiation [19, 20]. gle between the gamma and XUV photon, me the elec- Following the seminal calculations of photon-photon tron mass and c the speed of light in vacuum. In the scattering by Euler [21] and the full QED results by considered asymmetric setup, the high energy of gamma arXiv:2101.02671v1 [hep-ph] 7 Jan 2021 2 Karplus and Neuman [2, 22–24], proposals to detect photons allows to attain εCM . mec , while XUV beams elastic photon-photon scattering of synchrotron radia- provide a relatively large photon number density. More- tion [25] or of free electron laser (FEL) radiation [26, 27] over, although for kinematic reasons scattered photons were suggested. More recently, the advent of high-power are prevalently directed along the initial direction of the laser systems has led to ingenious proposals to detect gamma photon (see below), the high-collimation of the the finite photon-photon coupling induced by the pres- gamma beam implies that one or even both the scattered ence of virtual particles in the collision of intense laser photons are deflected to angles larger than the beam beams [28–32], in cavities [33, 34], with Bragg inter- opening angle, therefore providing an observable of the ference [35], and with measurements of vacuum bire- scattering event. frengence and dichroism induced by ultraintense laser Moreover, photon-photon scattering could also be me- fields [36–38]. However, despite the recent observation diated by axion-like particles, which would result in a of scattering of virtual photons in ultraperipheral Pb nu- systematic excess of the number of scattering events com- clei collision in the Large Hadron Collider [39, 40], the pared to QED predictions. Finally, the broadband nature interaction of real photons in vacuum has never been ob- of the gamma-ray beam allows photon-photon collisions 2

ψs

FIG. 1. Schematic setup. A collimated ultrarelativistic electron beam propagating along x collides with an intense linearly polarized optical laser pulse therefore generating a collimated gamma-ray beam. The laser pulse polarization axis and propagation direction are in the xy plane. The electron beam and possible positrons generated in the collision with the laser pulse are deflected by a magnetic field along z. The gamma-ray beam passes through a collimator, which selects photons with small angle with respect to the xy plane. The collimated gamma-ray beam collides with an XUV pulse propagating in the xz plane. Elastic photon-photon scattering events can result in large angle ψs := arctan (ps,z/ps,x) photon deflection.

2 mediated by such hypothetical particles to be probed For εCM > mec the process of two photon conversion across a wide range of sub-MeV CM energies. This ap- into an electron-positron pair becomes possible [2]. Al- proach for searching signals of new physics in the low- though two photon conversion into an electron-positron energy frontier [42] is independent and complementary pair is another important QED process that has not yet to those with matter [43–48] and with high-power opti- been observed directly [52, 53], its cross section is ∼ α−2 cal lasers [11–15]. larger than elastic photon-photon scattering [2], where The elastic photon-photon scattering cross section σ α ≈ 1/137 is the fine structure constant (see [54] for 2 2 reaches its maximum at εCM just above mec [σ(mec ) ≈ multiphoton electron-positron pair creation). Thus, the 1.3 × 10−34 m2], drops by three orders of magnitude al- detection of the much rarer elastic photon-photon pro- 2 2 −37 2 2 ready at εCM = 0.5 mec [σ(0.5 mec ) ≈ 2.2 × 10 m ], cess is facilitated in the region εCM < mec , where two − + and by further four orders of magnitude at εCM = photon e e pair conversion cannot occur. In fact, the 2 2 −41 2 − + 0.1 mec [σ(0.1 mec ) ≈ 1.3 × 10 m , see Fig.2]. created e e pair can yield a relatively large background Due to its strong energy dependence σ ≈ 1.29 × of photons via Compton backscattering, therefore hiding −35 2 6 2 2 10 (εCM/mec ) m for εCM . 0.3 mec (see Fig.2)], signs of elastic photon-photon scattering. In addition, for optical photon beams such as those delivered by the almost complete suppression of background noise associ- most powerful lasers worldwide [49], σ falls to the tiny ated with Compton scattering of gamma rays with stray value σ(1.55 eV) ≈ 10−68 m2. The smallness of the cross particles requires to operate in extreme high vacuum con- −11 section implies that a large number of photons are re- ditions (. 10 Pa) similar to those of accelerators and quired to trigger elastic photon-photon scattering. In storage ring facilities [55, 56]. Background noise can be fact, the total number of scattering events occurring measured by comparing the results obtained by running in the head-on collision of two identical photon beams the experiment with and without the XUV pulse. 2 with focal area S and with Nγ photons is Nγ σ(εCM)/S. Thus, for 1.55 eV photon energy and S ≈ 10−10 m, one We start considering the simpler case of head-on col- 29 needs Nγ ≈ 10 in order to trigger a single scatter- lision of two photons with the same energy, i.e., in the ing event. This huge number of photons corresponds to CM frame. Figure2 plots the normalized differential 2.5×1010 J energy per beam, well above the energy deliv- elastic photon-photon scattering cross section σ−1dσ/dΩ ered by the world’s highest energy facilities such as Laser for different values of εCM. While the full expression of Mégajoule [50] and the National Ignition Facility [51]. dσ/dΩ is considerably complex [2, 23, 24], Fig.2 shows 2 −10 By contrast, for 0.5 mec photons and S ≈ 10 m, one that the angular distribution of scattered photons weakly 13 needs Nγ ≈ 2.1 × 10 for triggering a single scatter- depends on εCM, such that its much simpler low energy 2 ing event, which corresponds to an energy of 0.87 J per approximation εCM mec can be used to infer the beam. This highlights that a key requirement for trigger- key features of the scattered photon distribution. In this 2 ing elastic photon-photon scattering is εCM . mec and case, for head-on collision of two photons with energy εγ a source of large numbers of photons. and εω, one gets 3

2 2 6 2 p 2 2 2 2 dσ 139α r ε [4γ − 1 − 8γCM γ − 1 cos θ + (4γ − 3) cos θ] ≈ e CM CM CM CM , (1) 2 2 p 2 6 dΩ 64800π mec (γCM − γCM − 1 cos θ)

- 0.70 10 34 s 1.0 10-35 > θ )

0.65 2 -36 3 10 0.8 γCM = 10 (m 10-37 σ -

Ω 0.60 10 38 0.6 10-39 0.55 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 dσ/d 0.4 1 2 εCM (mec ) −

σ 0.50 4 3 0.2 γCM = 10 γCM = 5 × 10 0.45

Fraction scattered to 0.0 0.40 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.0010 cos θ θs

FIG. 2. Normalized exact differential elastic photon-photon FIG. 3. Fraction of photons elastically scattered to angles −1 4 scattering cross section σ dσ/dΩ in the CM frame for greater than θs from Eq. (1) as a function of θs for γCM = 10 2 2 3 3 εCM = 0.9 mec (orange line), εCM = 0.5 mec (blue line), (orange line), γCM = 5 × 10 (black line), and γCM = 10 2 2 εCM = 0.1 mec (red line), and the εCM mec approxi- (blue line). mation (black dashed line). The inset plots the exact total elastic photon-photon cross section σ (orange line) and its 2 εCM mec approximation (black dashed line). 2 εCM . mec and γCM . γe/2 are fulfilled for all photons of the gamma-ray beam. This implies that, in principle, the conditions for observing photon-photon scattering −15 where re ≈ 2.8 × 10 m is the classical electron radius, can be always achieved in an asymmetric photon collider. 2 2 −1/2 p γCM := (1 − v /c ) = εγ /4εω, v is the CM frame However, in practice, this is limited by the finite electron velocity in the laboratory frame, and dΩ := sin θdθdϕ beam emittance and by the need of high-energy electron is the solid angle. By integrating Eq. (1) over the polar beams. Indeed, for optical photons εω = 1.55 eV, an angle 0 ≤ θ ≤ θs, one can get the fraction of photons ultralow emittance 168 GeV electron beam would be re- scattered at angles larger than θ for different values of s quired, whereas for εω = 100 eV a much more affordable γCM (see Fig.3). This is an important quantity because, 2.6 GeV electron beam would suffice. Notice that, how- by setting θs equal to the incident photon beam opening ever, the number of attainable photons per XUV beam angle, it determines the fraction of detectable scattering √ decreases with increasing εω, such that an optimal oper- events. As shown in Fig.3, for θs = 7/10γCM approx- ational regime is achievable with tens of eV photons. imately 90% of photons are scattered to angles larger We consider an electron beam with 0.96 nC charge, than θ , which drops to 50% for θ = 1/γCM. Thus, s p s Gaussian energy distribution with 13 GeV mean energy, 1/γCM = 4εω/εγ should be comparable or smaller than 13 MeV rms energy spread, and 3 mm mrad normalized the photon beam angular aperture for observing photon- emittance. The beam spatial distribution has cylindrical photon scattering. Since photon emission by ultrarel- symmetry around the propagation axis x, and is Gaus- ativistic electrons in the presence of strong background sian with 20 µm (5 µm) longitudinal (transverse) rms electromagnetic fields occurs in a cone with ∼ 1/γe open- width. Similar electron beam parameters could be at- ing angle around the electron’s momentum [57, 58], where tained at existing facilities worldwide [59–62]. The elec- γe is the relativistic factor of the emitting electron, we tron beam collides with a 30 TW linearly polarized laser need to assess when γCM . γe. pulse with 30 fs duration FWHM of the intensity and Here we consider gamma ray generation in the col- 17 degrees electron beam-laser pulse crossing angle (see lision of an electron beam with an intense laser pulse Fig.1). The laser pulse intensity is 2 .2 × 1020 W/cm2 with normalized field amplitude ξ = eE0/meωc, where (ξ = 10), while its wavelength and waist radius are E0 and ω are the peak of the electric field and the fre- 0.8 µm and 3 µm, respectively. Since the electron beam quency of the laser pulse, respectively. If γe ξ, then propagates along x and the laser pulse polarization axis 2 √ εγ < γemec . For a given εω, both εCM = εγ εω and and propagation direction are in the xy plane, large an- p γCM = εγ /4εω are monotonically increasing functions gle photon emission occurs mainly in the xy plane, with 2 of εγ . Thus, εγ ≈ γemec corresponds to the maxi- |ηγ | := | arctan (pγ,y/pγ,x)| of the order of ξ/γe, whereas 2 mal εCM and γCM. By choosing γe = mec /εω, both |ψγ | := | arctan (pγ,z/pγ,x)| remains of the order of 1/γe. 4

(a) Number of scattered photons )] γ N max( / (GeV) γ γ (mrad) N ε [ s (mrad) 10 ψ s ψ log

(b) ηs (mrad) )]

γ εs (MeV) N FIG. 5. Number of elastically scattered photons for one-week

max( operation time as a function of the scattered photon energy / (mrad) γ

γ εs and of the photon scattering angle with respect to the xy N η [ plane ψs := arctan (ps,z/ps,x). The inset displays the number 10 of events as a function of ψs and of the scattering angle with log respect to the xz plane ηs := arctan (ps,y/ps,x). Photons scattered in the region outside the two black horizontal lines provide detectable signal of scattering.

ψγ (mrad) photons pass through the collimator, and ≈ 2.3 × 108 FIG. 4. Normalized gamma-ray beam distributions after of these photons have energy larger than 3.25 GeV, i.e., 2 the collimator. (a) log10[Nγ (ψγ , εγ )/max(Nγ (ψγ , εγ ))], (b) reach εCM > mec /2 in the collision with a XUV pulse log10[Nγ (ψγ , ηγ )/max(Nγ (ψγ , ηγ ))]. Nγ is the photon num- with 20 eV photon energy (see below). ber, ε the photon energy, while ψ := arctan (p /p ) and γ γ γ,z γ,x After passing through the collimator, photons collide ηγ := arctan (pγ,y/pγ,x) are the photon angles with respect to the xy and xz plane, respectively. Note the different scale for with an XUV pulse propagating in the xz plane with ψγ and ηγ . 10 degrees crossing angle, and scattered photons with |ψs| > max(|ψγ |) ≈ 0.1 mrad are subsequently detected (see Fig.1). The XUV pulse has 1 mJ energy, 50 fs duration, 8 µm waist radius and 20 eV photon energy. Pulses Here and in the following, p is the photon momentum, with comparable parameters could be delivered by FELs and the subscripts γ and s denote quantities referring such as FLASH [64] or FERMI [65]. Alternatively, XUV to the gamma-ray beam and to the scattered photons, pulses with tens eV photon energy and ∼ mJ pulse en- respectively. ergy can also be generated in high-harmonic generation After scattering, the electron beam and possible with xenon [66]. positrons produced in the interaction with the laser are Figure5 reports the number of elastically scattered deviated by a 1 T magnetic field directed along z and photons integrated over one-week operation time assum- generated by permanent magnets with 2 cm length (see ing a typical 10 Hz repetition rate. In our code, the Fig.1). Subsequently, gamma photons pass through a exact elastic photon-photon scattering cross section [2] 2 collimator consisting of two thick parallel plates opaque was employed for εCM ≥ 0.1mec , and its low energy 2 to gamma rays with 13 cm length along x, and 9 µm approximation for εCM < 0.1mec . All registered scat- 2 interplate distance along z. The gamma-ray beam dis- tering events occurred for photons with εCM ≥ 0.1mec . tributions as a function of (εγ , ψγ ) and of (ηγ , ψγ ) are As a result of a scattering event, the gamma or the XUV reported in panels (a) and (b) of Fig.4, respectively. De- photon, or even both photons, can be scattered at rela- tails on the methodology for simulating the photon spec- tively large |ψs|. The average number of elastic collision trum are reported in Ref. [58]. Following the implications events over one day (week) operation time is approxi- in Ref. [63], the angular photon distribution can here be mately 113 (793), which leads to approximately 78 (550) obtained by employing the locally-constant-field approxi- photons scattered in the detectable region, i.e., outside mation for higher energy photons [57, 58], while for lower the two black horizontal lines in Fig.5. Moreover, in energy photons the linear Compton scattering angular approximately 4 (32) of the above-mentioned 113 (793) distribution can be used [63]. Approximately 1.6 × 109 events over one day (week) both initial photons elasti- 5 cally scatter in the detectable region, therefore providing string theory by shining light through a magnetic field,” strong evidence of an elastic photon-photon scattering Physics Letters B 666, 66–70 (2008). event. Note that after collision, the energy of the XUV [11] Daniele Tommasini, Albert Ferrando, Humberto photon is upshifted to the multi-MeV region, with the en- Michinel, and Marcos Seco, “Precision tests of QED and non-standard models by searching photon-photon ergy of photons in the detectable region roughly ranging scattering in vacuum with high power lasers,” Journal from 5 MeV to 5 GeV (see Fig.5). of High Energy Physics 2009, 043–043 (2009). Finally, we mention that further increase of the de- [12] Joerg Jaeckel and Andreas Ringwald, “The low-energy tectable signal is possible by increasing the energy of the frontier of particle physics,” Annual Review of Nuclear electron beam, such that emission occurs in the “super- and Particle Science 60, 405–437 (2010). critical QED regime”, where electron-to-photon energy [13] Selym Villalba-Chávez and Antonino Di Piazza, “Axion- induced birefringence effects in laser driven nonlinear conversion efficiency becomes large [67]. This would also vacuum interaction,” Journal of High Energy Physics allow both to reduce the required XUV photon energy 2013, 136 (2013). and to increase the number of XUV photons for a given [14] S. Villalba-Chávez, S. Meuren, and C. Müller, pulse energy, with substantial increase of the number of “Minicharged particles search by strong laser pulse- scattering events. Alternatively to Compton backscatter- induced vacuum polarization effects,” Physics Letters B ing at higher electron beam energies, efficient generation 763, 445–453 (2016). of ultradense collimated gamma beams can also be ob- [15] K. A. Beyer, G. Marocco, R. Bingham, and G. Gre- gori, “Axion detection through resonant photon-photon tained with 10 GeV high-current electron beams colliding collisions,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 095018 (2020). with multiple thin foils [68]. [16] David J.E. Marsh, “Axion cosmology,” Physics Reports Acknowledgments – We thank Karen Hatsagortsyan 643, 1–79 (2016). and Christian Ott for useful discussions on high harmonic [17] Elisa G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-Light Dark Matter,” arXiv generation. e-prints , arXiv:2005.03254 (2020), arXiv:2005.03254. [18] Raymond T. Co and Keisuke Harigaya, “Axiogenesis,” This article comprises parts of the PhD thesis work of Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 111602 (2020). Maitreyi Sangal, submitted to the Heidelberg University, [19] Yuto Minami and Eiichiro Komatsu, “New extraction of Germany. the cosmic birefringence from the planck 2018 polarization data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 221301 (2020). [20] Tomohiro Fujita, Kai Murai, Hiromasa Nakatsuka, and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Detection of isotropic cosmic birefringence and its implications for axion-like particles in- ∗ [email protected] cluding dark energy,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2011.11894 [1] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory (2020). of Fields, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Oxford, 1975). [21] Hans Euler, “Uber¨ die streuung von licht an licht nach [2] V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, der diracschen theorie,” Annalen der Physik 418, 398– Quantum Electrodynamics, Course of theoretical physics 448 (1936). (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1982). [22] Robert Karplus and Maurice Neuman, “Non-linear inter- [3] Andrzej A. Zdziarski and Roland Svensson, “Propaga- actions between electromagnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. 80, tion of gamma-rays at cosmological redshifts,” Nuclear 380–385 (1950). Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 10, 81–87 (1989). [23] Robert Karplus and Maurice Neuman, “The scattering [4] Roland Svensson and Andrzej Zdziarski, “Photon- of light by light,” Phys. Rev. 83, 776–784 (1951). Photon Scattering of Gamma Rays at Cosmological Dis- [24] B. De Tollis, “The scattering of photons by photons,” Il tances,” Astrophys. J. 349, 415 (1990). Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 35, 1182–1193 (1965). [5] V. I. Ritus, “Quantum effects of the interaction of ele- [25] Paul L. Csonka and K. S. Kölbig,“Photon-photon scat- mentary particles with an intense electromagnetic field,” tering with synchrotron radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 10, J. Russ. Laser Res. 6, 497–617 (1985). 251–261 (1974). [6] Mattias Marklund and Padma K. Shukla, “Nonlinear col- [26] W. Becker, J. K. McIver, and R. R. Schlicher, “Scatter- lective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma inter- ing of light by light: Possible experimental detection,” actions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 591–640 (2006). Phys. Rev. A 38, 4891–4894 (1988). [7] A. Di Piazza, C. Müller,K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. [27] W. Becker, J. K. McIver, and R. R. Schlicher, “Testing Keitel, “Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with the photon–photon sector of quantum electrodynamics fundamental quantum systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, with free-electron lasers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 1083– 1177–1228 (2012). 1089 (1989). [8] Dunne, G.V., “Extreme quantum field theory and parti- [28] E. Lundström, G. Brodin, J. Lundin, M. Marklund, cle physics with izest,” Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 223, R. Bingham, J. Collier, J. T. Mendon¸ca, and P. Norreys, 1055–1061 (2014). “Using high-power lasers for detection of elastic photon- [9] Holger Gies, Joerg Jaeckel, and Andreas Ringwald, “Po- photon scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 083602 (2006). larized light propagating in a magnetic field as a probe [29] Daniele Tommasini, Albert Ferrando, Humberto for millicharged fermions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 140402 Michinel, and Marcos Seco, “Detecting photon-photon (2006). scattering in vacuum at exawatt lasers,” Phys. Rev. A [10] Steven A. Abel, Joerg Jaeckel, Valentin V. Khoze, and 77, 042101 (2008). Andreas Ringwald, “Illuminating the hidden sector of 6

[30] Ben King, Antonino Di Piazza, and Christoph H. Keitel, A. Kopec, H. Landsman, R. F. Lang, L. Levinson, Q. Lin, “A matterless double slit,” Nature Photonics 4, 92–94 S. Lindemann, M. Lindner, F. Lombardi, J. A. M. Lopes, (2010). E. López Fune, C. Macolino, J. Mahlstedt, A. Manfre- [31] B King and C H Keitel, “Photon–photon scattering in dini, F. Marignetti, T. MarrodánUndagoitia, J. Masbou, collisions of intense laser pulses,” New Journal of Physics S. Mastroianni, M. Messina, K. Micheneau, K. Miller, 14, 103002 (2012). A. Molinario, K. Mor˚a, Y. Mosbacher, M. Murra, [32] Y. Monden and R. Kodama, “Interaction of two coun- J. Naganoma, K. Ni, U. Oberlack, K. Odgers, J. Palacio, terpropagating laser beams with vacuum,” Phys. Rev. A B. Pelssers, R. Peres, J. Pienaar, V. Pizzella, G. Plante, 86, 033810 (2012). R. Podviianiuk, J. Qin, H. Qiu, D. Ram´ırez Garc´ıa, [33] Gert Brodin, Mattias Marklund, and Lennart Stenflo, S. Reichard, B. Riedel, A. Rocchetti, N. Rupp, J. M. F. “Proposal for detection of qed vacuum nonlinearities in dos Santos, G. Sartorelli, N. Sarˇcević,M.ˇ Scheibelhut, maxwell’s equations by the use of waveguides,” Phys. S. Schindler, J. Schreiner, D. Schulte, M. Schumann, Rev. Lett. 87, 171801 (2001). L. Scotto Lavina, M. Selvi, P. Shagin, E. Shockley, [34] Daniel Eriksson, Gert Brodin, Mattias Marklund, and M. Silva, H. Simgen, C. Therreau, D. Thers, F. Toschi, Lennart Stenflo, “Possibility to measure elastic photon- G. Trinchero, C. Tunnell, N. Upole, M. Vargas, G. Volta, photon scattering in vacuum,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 013808 O. Wack, H. Wang, Y. Wei, C. Weinheimer, D. Wenz, (2004). C. Wittweg, J. Wulf, J. Ye, Y. Zhang, T. Zhu, and [35] Gagik Yu. Kryuchkyan and Karen Z. Hatsagortsyan, J. P. Zopounidis (XENON Collaboration), “Light dark “Bragg scattering of light in vacuum structured by strong matter search with ionization signals in xenon1t,” Phys. periodic fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 053604 (2011). Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019). [36] Rohoollah Mohammadi, I. Motie, and She-Sheng Xue, [45] Teng Wu, John W. Blanchard, Gary P. Centers, “Circular polarization from linearly-polarized-laser-beam Nataniel L. Figueroa, Antoine Garcon, Peter W. Gra- collisions,” Phys. Rev. A 89, 062111 (2014). ham, Derek F. Jackson Kimball, Surjeet Rajendran, [37] Yoshihide Nakamiya and Kensuke Homma, “Probing vac- Yevgeny V. Stadnik, Alexander O. Sushkov, Arne Wick- uum birefringence under a high-intensity laser field with enbrock, and Dmitry Budker, “Search for axionlike dark gamma-ray polarimetry at the gev scale,” Phys. Rev. D matter with a liquid-state nuclear spin comagnetometer,” 96, 053002 (2017). Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191302 (2019). [38] Sergey Bragin, Sebastian Meuren, Christoph H. Keitel, [46] Yonit Hochberg, Ilya Charaev, Sae-Woo Nam, Varun and Antonino Di Piazza, “High-energy vacuum birefrin- Verma, Marco Colangelo, and Karl K. Berggren, gence and dichroism in an ultrastrong laser field,” Phys. “Detecting sub-gev dark matter with superconducting Rev. Lett. 119, 250403 (2017). nanowires,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 151802 (2019). [39] M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), “Evidence for [47] Rouven Essig, JesúsPérez-R´ıos, Harikrishnan Ramani, light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the and Oren Slone, “Direct detection of nuclear scattering of atlas detector at the lhc,” Nat. Phys. 13, 852–858 (2017). sub-gev dark matter using molecular excitations,” Phys. [40] G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), “Observation of Rev. Research 1, 033105 (2019). light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheral Pb + Pb col- [48] Q. Arnaud, E. Armengaud, C. Augier, A. Benoˆıt, lisions with the atlas detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, L. Bergé, J. Billard, A. Broniatowski, P. Camus, 052001 (2019). A. Cazes, M. Chapellier, F. Charlieux, M. De Jésus, [41] T. Yamaji, T. Inada, T. Yamazaki, T. Namba, S. Asai, L. Dumoulin, K. Eitel, E. Elkhoury, J.-B. Fillipini, T. Kobayashi, K. Tamasaku, Y. Tanaka, Y. Inubushi, D. Filosofov, J. Gascon, A. Giuliani, M. Gros, Y. Jin, K. Sawada, M. Yabashi, and T. Ishikawa, “An exper- A. Juillard, M. Kleifges, H. Lattaud, S. Marnieros, iment of x-ray photon–photon elastic scattering with a D. Misiak, X.-F. Navick, C. Nones, E. Olivieri, C. Oriol, laue-case beam collider,” Physics Letters B 763, 454 – P. Pari, B. Paul, D. Poda, S. Rozov, T. Salagnac, 457 (2016). V. Sanglard, B. Siebenborn, L. Vagneron, M. Weber, [42] Rouven Essig, “The Low-Mass Dark Matter Frontier,” E. Yakushev, and A. Zolotarova (EDELWEISS Collabo- Physics Online Journal 13, 172 (2020). ration), “First germanium-based constraints on sub-mev [43] Rouven Essig, Aaron Manalaysay, Jeremy Mardon, Peter dark matter with the edelweiss experiment,” Phys. Rev. Sorensen, and Tomer Volansky, “First direct detection Lett. 125, 141301 (2020). limits on sub-gev dark matter from xenon10,” Phys. Rev. [49] Colin N. Danson, Constantin Haefner, Jake Bromage, Lett. 109, 021301 (2012). Thomas Butcher, Jean-Christophe F. Chanteloup, [44] E. Aprile, J. Aalbers, F. Agostini, M. Alfonsi, L. Al- Enam A. Chowdhury, Almantas Galvanauskas, thueser, F. D. Amaro, V. C. Antochi, E. Angelino, F. Ar- Leonida A. Gizzi, Joachim Hein, David I. Hillier, neodo, D. Barge, L. Baudis, B. Bauermeister, L. Bel- and et al., “Petawatt and exawatt class lasers world- lagamba, M. L. Benabderrahmane, T. Berger, P. A. wide,” High Power Laser Science and Engineering 7, e54 Breur, A. Brown, E. Brown, S. Bruenner, G. Bruno, (2019). R. Budnik, C. Capelli, J. M. R. Cardoso, D. Ci- [50] “Laser Mégajoule,” http://www-lmj.cea.fr/index. chon, D. Coderre, A. P. Colijn, J. Conrad, J. P. Cus- html (2020). sonneau, M. P. Decowski, P. de Perio, A. Depoian, [51] “National Ignition Facility,” https://lasers.llnl.gov/ P. Di Gangi, A. Di Giovanni, S. Diglio, A. Elykov, (2020). G. Eurin, J. Fei, A. D. Ferella, A. Fieguth, W. Ful- [52] O. J. Pike, F. Mackenroth, E. G. Hill, and S. J. Rose, gione, P. Gaemers, A. Gallo Rosso, M. Galloway, F. Gao, “A photon-photon collider in a vacuum hohlraum,” Nat. M. Garbini, L. Grandi, Z. Greene, C. Hasterok, C. Hils, Phys. 8, 434–436 (2014). E. Hogenbirk, J. Howlett, M. Iacovacci, R. Itay, F. Jo- [53] Alexander Thomas, “Antimatter creation in an x-ray erg, S. Kazama, A. Kish, M. Kobayashi, G. Koltman, bath,” Nat. Phys. 8, 429–431 (2014). 7

[54] D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. E. Spencer, (2020). D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. W. [63] A. Di Piazza, M. Tamburini, S. Meuren, and C. H. Weidemann, C. Bula, K. T. McDonald, E. J. Prebys, Keitel, “Implementing nonlinear compton scattering be- C. Bamber, S. J. Boege, T. Koffas, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. yond the local-constant-field approximation,” Phys. Rev. Melissinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, D. A. Reis, and W. Ragg, A 98, 012134 (2018). “Positron production in multiphoton light-by-light scat- [64] “Flash at desy,” https://flash.desy.de/ (2020). tering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1626–1629 (1997). [65] “Fermi lightsource,” https://www.elettra.eu/ [55] P.A. Redhead, “Extreme high vacuum,” (1999), lightsources/fermi.html (2020). 10.5170/CERN-1999-005.213. [66] A. Nayak, I. Orfanos, I. Makos, M. Dumergue, S. Kühn, [56] “High, ultra & extreme high vacuum genera- E. Skantzakis, B. Bodi, K. Varju, C. Kalpouzos, H. I. B. tion,” https://www.vacuumscienceworld.com/ Banks, A. Emmanouilidou, D. Charalambidis, and ultra-and-extreme-high-vacuum (2020). P. Tzallas, “Multiple ionization of argon via multi-xuv- [57] V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, and V. M. Strakhovenko, photon absorption induced by 20-gw high-order harmonic Electromagnetic Processes at High Energies in Oriented laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 023426 (2018). Single Crystals (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998). [67] Matteo Tamburini and Sebastian Meuren, “Efficient [58] A. Di Piazza, M. Tamburini, S. Meuren, and C. H. High-Energy Photon Production in the Supercritical Keitel, “Improved local-constant-field approximation for QED Regime,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1912.07508 (2019). strong-field qed codes,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 022125 (2019). [68] Archana Sampath, Xavier Davoine, Sébastien Corde, [59] V. Yakimenko, L. Alsberg, E. Bong, G. Bouchard, Laurent Gremillet, Maitreyi Sangal, Christoph H. Kei- C. Clarke, C. Emma, S. Green, C. Hast, M. J. tel, Robert Ariniello, John Cary, Henrik Ekerfelt, Clau- Hogan, J. Seabury, N. Lipkowitz, B. O’Shea, D. Storey, dio Emma, Frederico Fiuza, Hiroki Fujii, Max Gilljo- G. White, and G. Yocky, “FACET-II facility for ad- hann, Mark Hogan, Chan Joshi, Alexander Knetsch, vanced accelerator experimental tests,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Olena Kononenko, Valentina Lee, Mike Litos, Kenneth Beams 22, 101301 (2019). Marsh, Zan Nie, Brendan O’Shea, J. Ryan Peterson, [60] “European xfel facility,” https://www.xfel.eu/ (2020). Pablo San Miguel Claveria, Doug Storey, Yipeng Wu, [61] “Linac coherent light source (lcls),” https://lcls.slac. Xinlu Xu, Chaojie Zhang, and Matteo Tamburini, “Ex- stanford.edu/ (2020). tremely Dense Gamma-Ray Pulses in Electron Beam- [62] “Pohang accelerator laboratory x-ray free electron Multifoil Collisions,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2009.01808 laser (pal-xfel),” http://pal.postech.ac.kr/paleng/ (2020), arXiv:2009.01808.