Arxiv:0902.3360V1

HU-EP-09/07, HRI-P-09-02-001, RECAPP-HRI-2009-003 The Muon g-2 a,b, c Fred Jegerlehner ∗, Andreas Nyffeler aHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Physik, Newtonstrasse 15, D-12489 Berlin, Germany bInstitute of Physics, University of Silesia, ul. Uniwersytecka 4, PL-40007 Katowice, Poland cRegional Centre for Accelerator-based Particle Physics, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad - 211 019, India Abstract The muon anomalous magnetic moment is one of the most precisely measured quantities in particle physics. In a recent experiment at Brookhaven it has been measured with a remarkable 14-fold improvement of the previous CERN experiment reaching a precision of 0.54ppm. Since the first results were published, a persisting “discrepancy” between theory and experiment of about 3 standard deviations is observed. It is the largest “established” deviation from the Standard Model seen in a “clean” electroweak observable and thus could be a hint for New Physics to be around the corner. This deviation triggered numerous speculations about the possible origin of the “missing piece” and the increased experimental precision animated a multitude of new theoretical efforts which lead to a substantial improvement of the prediction of the muon anomaly aµ =(gµ − 2)/2. The dominating uncertainty of the prediction, caused by strong interaction effects, could be reduced substantially, due to new hadronic cross section measurements in electron-positron annihilation at low energies. Also the recent electron g − 2 measurement at Harvard contributes substantially to the progress in this field, as it allows for a much more precise determination of the fine structure constant α as well as a cross check of the status of our theoretical understanding. In this report we review the theory of the anomalous magnetic moments of the electron and the muon. After an introduction and a brief description of the principle of the muon g − 2 experiment, we present a review of the status of the theoretical prediction and in particular discuss the role of the hadronic vacuum polarization effects and the hadronic light–by–light scattering correction, including a new evaluation of the dominant pion-exchange contribution. In the end, we find a 3.2 standard deviation discrepancy between experiment and Standard Model arXiv:0902.3360v1 [hep-ph] 19 Feb 2009 prediction. We also present a number of examples of how extensions of the electroweak Standard Model would change the theoretical prediction of the muon anomaly aµ. Perspectives for future developments in experiment and theory are briefly discussed and critically assessed. The muon g − 2 will remain one of the hot topics for further investigations. Key words: muon, anomalous magnetic moment, precision tests PACS: 14.60.Ef, 13.40.Em ∗ Corresponding author. Email addresses: [email protected] (Fred Jegerlehner), [email protected] (Andreas Nyffeler). URLs: www-com.physik.hu-berlin.de/~fjeger/ (Fred Jegerlehner), www.hri.res.in/~nyffeler (Andreas Nyffeler). Preprint submitted to Elsevier 19 February 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 History 6 1.2 Muon Properties 8 1.3 Lepton Magnetic Moments 11 2 The Muon g 2 Experiments 13 − 2.1 The Brookhaven Muon g 2 Experiment 13 − 2.2 Summary of Experimental Results 18 3 QED Prediction of g 2 19 − 3.1 Universal Contributions 21 3.2 Electron Anomalous Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant 25 3.3 Mass Dependent Contributions 27 4 Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Corrections 38 4.1 Lowest Order Vacuum Polarization Contribution 40 4.2 Higher Order Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Corrections 52 5 Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution 56 5.1 Pseudoscalar–exchange Contribution 61 5.2 Summary of the Light-by-Light Scattering Results 73 5.3 An Effective Field Theory Approach to Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering 78 6 Electroweak Corrections 80 6.1 1-loop Contribution 80 6.2 2-loop Contribution 81 6.3 2–loop electroweak contributions to ae 93 7 Muon g-2: Theory versus Experiment 95 7.1 Standard Model Prediction 95 7.2 New Physics Contributions 97 8 Outlook and Conclusions 119 8.1 Future Experimental Possibilities 119 8.2 Theory: Critical Assessment of Theoretical Errors and Open Problems 119 8.3 Conclusions 123 A Some Standard Model parameters, ζ values and polylogarithms 124 References 125 1. Introduction The electron’s spin and magnetic moment were evidenced from the deflection of atoms in an inhomogeneous magnetic field and the observation of fine structure by optical spectroscopy [1,2]. Ever since, magnetic moments and g–values of particles in general and the g 2 experiments with the electron and the muon in particular, together with high precision atomic spectro−scopy, have played a central role in establishing the modern theoretical framework for particle physics. That is relativistic quantum field theory in general and quantum electrodynamics in particular, the prototype theory which developed further into the so called “Standard Model” (SM) of electromagnetic, weak and strong interactions based on a local gauge principle and spontaneous symmetry breaking. The muon g 2 is one of the most precisely measured and theoretically best investigated quantities in particle physics. Our− interest in very high precision measurements is motivated by our eagerness to exploit the limits of our present understanding of nature and to find effects which cannot be explained by the established theory. More than 30 years after its invention this is still the SM of elementary particle interactions, a SU(3)c SU(2)L U(1)Y gauge theory broken to SU(3)c U(1)em by the Higgs mechanism, which requires a not⊗ yet discovered⊗ Higgs particle to exist. ⊗ Designed to be a local, causal and renormalizable quantum field theory, quarks and leptons are allowed to come only in families in order to be anomaly free and not to conflict with renormalizability. So we have as the first family the quark doublet (u, d) of the up and down quarks accompanied by the lepton doublet (νe,e−) with the electron neutrino and the electron, with the left-handed fields in the doublets and all their right-handed partners in singlets. All normal matter is made up from these 1st family fermions. Most surprisingly a second and even a third quark–lepton family exist in nature, all with identical quantum numbers, as if nature would repeat itself. The corresponding members in the different families only differ 3 by their mass where the mass scales span an incredible range, from mνe <10− eV for the electron neutrino ∼ 2 to mt 173 GeV for the top quark. The existence of three families allows for an extremely rich pattern of all kinds≃ of phenomena which derive from the natural possibility of mixing of the horizontal vectors in family space formed by the members with identical quantum numbers. The most prominent new effects only possible with three or more families is CP violation. The first member of the second family that was discovered was the muon (µ). It was discovered in cosmic rays by Anderson & Neddermeyer in 1936 [3], only a few years after Anderson [4] had discovered (also in cosmic rays) in 1932 antimatter in form of the positron, a “positively charged electron” as predicted by Dirac in 1930 [5]. The µ was another version of an electron, just a heavier copy, and was extremely puzzling for physicists at that time. Its true nature only became clear much later after the first precise g 2 experiments had been performed. In fact the muon turns out to be a very special object in many respects− as we will see and these particular properties make it to play a crucial role in the development of elementary particle theory. The charged leptons primarily interact electromagnetically with the photon and weakly via the heavy gauge bosons W and Z, as well as very much weaker also with the Higgs. Puzzling enough, the three leptons e, µ and τ have identical properties, except for the masses which are given by me = 0.511 MeV, mµ = 105.658 MeV and mτ = 1776.99 MeV, respectively. As masses differ by orders of magnitude, the leptons show very different behavior, the most striking being the very different lifetimes. Within the SM the electron 6 is stable on time scales of the age of the universe, while the µ has a short lifetime of τµ =2.197 10− seconds 13 × and the τ is even more unstable with a lifetime τ = 2.906 10− seconds only. Also, the decay patterns τ × are very different: the µ decays very close to 100% into electrons plus two neutrinos (eν¯eνµ), however, the 0 τ decays to about 65% into hadronic states π−ν , π−π ν , , while the main leptonic decay modes τ τ · · · only account for 17.36% (µ−ν¯µντ ) and 17.85% (e−ν¯eντ ), respectively. This has a dramatic impact on the possibility to study these particles experimentally and to measure various properties precisely. The most precisely studied lepton is the electron, but the muon can also be explored with extreme precision. Since the muon turns out to be much more sensitive to hypothetical physics beyond the SM than the electron itself, the muon is much more suitable as a “crystal ball” which could give us hints about not yet uncovered 2 physics. The reason is that some effects scale with powers of mℓ , as we will see below. Unfortunately, the τ, where new physics effects would be even better visible, is so short lived, that corresponding experiments are not possible with present technology. As important as charge, spin, mass and lifetime, are the magnetic and electric dipole moments which are typical for spinning particles like the leptons.

Load more