The Association Between Education and Induced Abortion for Three Cohorts of Adults in Finland Heini Väisänen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Association Between Education and Induced Abortion for Three Cohorts of Adults in Finland Heini Väisänen The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland Heini Väisänen To cite this version: Heini Väisänen. The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland. Population Studies, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2015, 69 (3), pp.373-388. 10.1080/00324728.2015.1083608. hal-03085068 HAL Id: hal-03085068 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03085068 Submitted on 21 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Population Studies A Journal of Demography ISSN: 0032-4728 (Print) 1477-4747 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpst20 The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland Heini Väisänen To cite this article: Heini Väisänen (2015) The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland, Population Studies, 69:3, 373-388, DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1083608 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2015.1083608 © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 08 Oct 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 305 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rpst20 Download by: [LSE Library Services] Date: 27 July 2016, At: 07:56 Population Studies, 2015 Vol. 69, No. 3, 373–388, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2015.1083608 The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland Heini Väisänen London School of Economics and Political Science This paper explores whether the likelihood of abortion by education changed over time in Finland, where comprehensive family planning services and sexuality education have been available since the early 1970s. This subject has not previously been studied longitudinally with comprehensive and reliable data. A unique longitudinal set of register data of more than 250,000 women aged 20–49 born in 1955–59, 1965–69, and 1975–79 was analysed, using descriptive statistics, concentration curves, and discrete-time event-history models. Women with basic education had a higher likelihood of abortion than others and the association grew stronger for later cohorts. Selection into education may explain this phenomenon: although it was fairly common to have only basic education in the 1955–59 cohort, it became increasingly unusual over time. Thus, even though family planning services were easily available, socio-economic differences in the likelihood of abortion remained. Keywords: induced abortion; register data; Finland; reproductive health; event-history analysis [Submitted July 2014; Final version accepted February 2015] Introduction administrative registers that made it possible to investigate both the association between education In many countries women in less advantaged socio- and the likelihood of abortion and—something economic positions have more abortions than other that to the best of my knowledge other studies in women (Jones et al. 2002; Rasch et al. 2007;Hansen Finland or elsewhere have been unable to investi- et al. 2009; Regushevskaya et al. 2009). High preva- gate—whether the association changed over time. lence of contraceptive use has been shown to reduce The nature of the data set meant that the study the number of abortions in a population (Bongaarts did not suffer from attrition and non-response Downloaded by [LSE Library Services] at 07:56 27 July 2016 and Westoff 2000) and healthcare costs (Frost et al. common in panel studies or the common problem 2008, 2014; Cleland et al. 2011), but studies have not of underreporting of abortions in surveys (Jones examined whether universal access to family plan- and Kost 2007). ning services reduces socio-economic differences Previous studies on the topic in Finland differed in the likelihood of abortion. from the one reported here in one or more of the The aim of the study reported in this paper was to following respects: they were based on cross-sec- investigate differences by education in the likeli- tional surveys (Regushevskaya et al. 2009); they hood of abortion in Finland, a country where com- studied women who had had at least one abortion, prehensive family planning services and sexuality thus ignoring those who had never experienced education have been available since the early one (Heikinheimo et al. 2008, 2009; Niinimäki 1970s (Kosunen 2000;Kontula2010), and where et al. 2009; Väisänen and Jokela 2010); they did parents are offered generous financial and other not investigate the women’s level of education help to enable them to ensure that at least the essen- (Vikat et al. 2002; Hemminki et al. 2008;Sydsjö tial needs of their children are met (Vikat 2004; et al. 2009). Because most other countries in Haataja 2006). The study used a unique and nation- which studies have been undertaken do not have ally representative longitudinal data set based on register data on abortions (Gissler 2010), their © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 374 Heini Väisänen studies have been based on surveys, which often The Finnish context suffer from underreporting of abortions (Jones and Kost 2007). Before 1970, legislation in Finland allowed abortion in the following circumstances only: the woman’s Socio-economic status and pathways to life or health was at risk, or one of the parents was abortion believed to have a severe physical or mental illness, or the foetus had a medical problem, or pregnancy Previous studies in the US and Europe (including was due to rape or incest, or the woman was Finland) have shown that the likelihood of having an younger than 16 (Keski-Petäjä 2012). A change of abortion is positively associated with the following legislation in June 1970 established more liberal pro- characteristics: low socio-economic status (SES) visions. In particular, the change allowed abortion for (Rasch et al. 2007; Väisänen and Jokela 2010; Klemetti ‘social reasons’, defined as being under considerable et al. 2012); low education and income (Jones et al. strain owing to any of the following: living conditions 2002; Regushevskaya et al. 2009); young age (Jones or other circumstances; being younger than 17 or et al. 2002; Knudsen et al. 2003; Rasch et al. 2007;Niini- older than 40; and already having at least four chil- mäki et al. 2009; Klemetti et al. 2012); being single, dren (Knudsen et al. 2003). At first, abortions for having relationship problems, or previous births most social reasons were allowed until the end of (Jones et al. 2002; Rasch et al. 2007;Hansenetal. 16 weeks’ gestation, but in 1978 that was changed 2009; Regushevskaya et al. 2009; Klemetti et al. 2012); to 12 weeks. If the woman is younger than 17, or and previous abortions (Hansen et al. 2009; Niinimäki there is another special social reason for abortion, et al. 2009). an abortion can be allowed until the end of 20 A higher likelihood of experiencing an unintended weeks’ gestation. It is allowed until the end of 24 pregnancy is associated with a higher likelihood of an weeks’ gestation if the foetus has a medical abortion. Unintended pregnancies may be unwanted problem, and there is no limit on the period of ges- (not wanted at all) or mistimed (preferred later) tation if the woman’s life or health is at risk. If the (Trussell et al. 1999; Santelli et al. 2009). Pregnancies abortion is sought because of ‘considerable strain may be unintended for one or more of the following caused by living conditions or other circumstances’, reasons: because a woman does not want to have any the approval of two doctors is required. If it is (more) children, because she wants to postpone sought on the grounds of a woman’s age or number childbearing, because she does not want to have chil- of children, the approval of one doctor is enough dren with her current partner, or because she per- (Knudsen et al. 2003). In practice, approval is ceives her socio-economic situation as unfavourable granted if a woman applies for an abortion before for childbearing. the end of 12 weeks’ gestation (Gissler 2010). Low education and income have been associ- Attitudes towards abortion are liberal in Finland: ated with a higher likelihood of unintended preg- 65 per cent of Finns believe that abortions should nancies in the US (Finer and Zolna 2011), the be available on request (Kontula 2008). In the early Downloaded by [LSE Library Services] at 07:56 27 July 2016 UK (Wellings et al. 2013), and Spain (Font- 1990s, only 5 per cent of Finnish women were Ribera et al. 2007). That association was not against abortion in all situations (Notkola 1993). found in a study in the Netherlands. Although Abortions are currently provided at low cost in the highly educated women there were overall found public healthcare sector—for example, one of the less likely to become pregnant, there was no hospital districts charges between €30 and €100 association between education and the proportion depending on the duration of the pregnancy and of unintended pregnancies among all pregnancies whether it is a medical or surgical termination (Levels et al.
Recommended publications
  • The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States (2018)
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/24950 SHARE The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States (2018) DETAILS 222 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-46818-3 | DOI 10.17226/24950 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S.; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Board on Health Care Services; Health and Medicine Division; National FIND RELATED TITLES Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2018. The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24950. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States THE SAFETY AND QUALITY OF ABORTION CARE IN THE UNITED STATES Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S. Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice Board on Health Care Services Health and Medicine Division A Consensus Study Report of Copyright National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reproductive Right, Or a Moral Profligacy?
    A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHT, OR A MORAL PROFLIGACY? A POLICY PAPER DISCUSSING THE LEGISLATIVE FUTURE FOR MALTA An Għaqda Studenti Tal-Liġi Policy Paper © Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi 2020 OPENING REMARKS INTRODUCTION It is with great pleasure that I present A multidisciplinary modus operandi was to you this year’s GħSL policy paper employed to offer a holistic discussion addressing the subject of Abortion, a and this was achieved through a paper which is the culmination of the thorough examination of pertinent comprehensive work of the GħSL Policy areas beyond the legal sphere such as Office. medical research, ethical considerations involved, as well as the psychological GħSL strives to keep law students as aspects, among others. well as society as a whole abreast regarding current legal issues in Malta. Moreover, a comparative exercise was An ongoing area of contention featuring carried out, whereby the laws regulating, across local media centres around the restricting and prohibiting abortion were topic of abortion. Due to the polarised evaluated. This contributed towards a views on this subject, the GħSL comprehensive outcome of this policy Executive Board decided that it would paper and provided a robust reference be opportune to delve into this topic. point for active and potential students alike. As a body representing the interests of law students, throughout this paper our Finally, I would like to thank the main focus was to maintain and uphold colleagues of GħSL, including all those an impartial appreciation of the law who contributed to this paper, namely while taking into account the sensitive Dr Desiree Attard, Andrew Sciberras, nature of this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy As a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion Peter B
    Online Journal of Health Ethics Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 4 Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy as a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion Peter B. Bisong [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://aquila.usm.edu/ojhe Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Bisong, P. B. (2016). Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy as a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion. Online Journal of Health Ethics, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.1201.04 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Journal of Health Ethics by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy as a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion Introduction Abortion has over the years posed ethical, medical, political and legal problems in the world and in Nigeria in particular. These problems (such as, danger to health, psychological trauma, unnecessary economic cost, population depletion etc) have been and have continued to be fuelled by the pro-abortionists supportive arguments. The pro-abortionists argue that abortion is good because it brings financial benefits to medical practitioners; it preserves the life of the mother when in danger; it controls population and enables the couple to live a more comfortable and meaningful life amongst other reasons. Unfortunately these arguments seem to have taken root in the heart of Nigerians, for only this will explain why Nigerians still perform abortion en masse in spite of the current illegality status of it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association Between Education and Induced Abortion
    Heini Väisänen Department of Social Policy London school of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE [email protected] The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland (Short title: Education and induced abortion in Finland) Heini Väisänen London School of Economics and Political Science To cite this article, please refer to: Heini Väisänen (2015): The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland, Population Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1083608 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2015.1083608 This paper explores whether the likelihood of abortion by education changed over time in Finland, where comprehensive family planning services and sexuality education have been available since the early 1970s. This subject has not previously been studied longitudinally with comprehensive and reliable data. A unique longitudinal set of register data of more than 250,000 women aged 20–49 born in 1955–59, 1965–69, and 1975–79 was analysed, using descriptive statistics, concentration curves, and discrete-time event-history models. Women with basic education had a higher likelihood of abortion than others and the association grew stronger for later cohorts. Selection into education may explain this phenomenon: although it was fairly common to have only basic education in the 1955–59 cohort, it became increasingly unusual over time. Thus, even though family planning services were easily available, socio-economic differences in the likelihood of abortion remained. Keywords: induced abortion; register data; Finland; reproductive health; event-history analysis Introduction In many countries women in less advantaged socioeconomic positions have more abortions than other women (Jones et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Yes We Can! Successful Examples of Disallowing ‘Conscientious Objection’ in Reproductive Health Care
    The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care ISSN: 1362-5187 (Print) 1473-0782 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iejc20 Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care Christian Fiala, Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Oskari Heikinheimo, Jens A. Guðmundsson & Joyce Arthur To cite this article: Christian Fiala, Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Oskari Heikinheimo, Jens A. Guðmundsson & Joyce Arthur (2016) Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care, The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 21:3, 201-206, DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2016.1138458 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2016.1138458 Published online: 03 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 374 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iejc20 Download by: [81.223.16.2] Date: 28 October 2016, At: 06:29 THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2016 VOL. 21, NO. 3, 201–206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2016.1138458 SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC ARTICLE Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care Christian Fialaa,b, Kristina Gemzell Danielssonb, Oskari Heikinheimoc, Jens A. Guômundssond and Joyce Arthure aGynmed Clinic for Abortion and Family
    [Show full text]
  • TOP 10 MYTHS ABOUT ABORTION by Ingrid Skop, M.D
    Cover TOP 10 MYTHS ABOUT ABORTION By Ingrid Skop, M.D. family research council Washington, D.C. A NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR: I hope the points I have raised in this paper will cause those who consider themselves to be “pro-choice” to question some of the assumptions they have made about abortion. Abortion is a difficult topic to talk or even think about. It has invaded deeply into the fiber of our society precisely because most of us do not want to address it until it confronts us directly. While most Americans have ignored it and while our health departments and medical societies have turned a blind eye to it, abortion has adversely affected far too many women, injured many physically and emotionally, destroyed families, and damaged the psyche of our country. Pro-abortion rhetoric sounds so benign (“women’s rights”; “reproductive freedom”; “women’s health care”) that many times we fail to think about what these terms represent. You don’t have to believe like I do—that abortion is harmful to women, families, and society. But please have the courage to look into it yourself. Follow the leads I have provided in the citations to study this subject more deeply. Begin to have difficult conversations with friends and family so you can help others to really confront this issue too. It is time that our country sees abortion for what it really is—for the sake of women and children yet unborn. Ingrid Skop, M.D. April 23, 2018 Ingrid Skop, M.D., F.A.C.O.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Policies and Reproductive Health Around the World
    Abortion Policies and Reproductive Health around the World United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division DESA The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Notes The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This report presents data for countries using a traditional classification by development group. The “developed regions” comprise all countries and areas of Europe plus Northern America, Australia, New Zealand and Japan. The “developing regions” comprise all countries and areas of Africa, Asia (excluding Japan), Latin America and the Caribbean plus Melanesia, Micronesia and Polynesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion and Repeat Abortion in Grampian
    Abortion and Repeat Abortion In Grampian A report for the Sexual Health and Blood Borne Virus Managed Care Network (MCN) NHS Grampian March 2015 This document is also available in large print and other formats and languages upon request. Please call NHS Grampian Corporate Communications on (01224) 551116 or (01224) 552245. Contents Page Acknowledgements 1 Glossary 2 Foreword 3 Recommendations 4 Introduction 5 Section 1: Abortions in Grampian (2009-2013) 6 1. Background 6 2. Overview of abortion rates in Grampian: ISD Data 6 2.1 Grounds for abortion 7 2.2 Abortion rates and deprivation 8 3. Abortion rates by age and local authority area 9 3.1 Aberdeen City 9 3.2 Aberdeenshire 9 3.3 Moray 11 4. Abortion rates by intermediate zone 11 4.1 Aberdeen City 11 4.2 Aberdeenshire 12 4.3 Moray 13 5. Abortion rates by deprivation 15 5.1 Aberdeen City 15 5.2 Aberdeenshire 15 5.3 Moray 15 6. Abortion rates by GP cluster zone 17 6.1 Aberdeen 17 6.2 Aberdeenshire 17 6.3 Moray 17 7. Travel times to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Dr Grays 19 8. Key Findings 22 Section 2: Repeat abortions in Grampian (2010-2013) 23 1. Background 23 2. Results: Analysis of the Grampian TOP Database 23 2.1 Comparison of characteristics of women with 24 single and multiple abortions 2.2 Multivariate analysis 24 Section 3: International Systematic Review – Determinant 29 factors of repeat abortion 1. Background 29 1.1 Definitions 30 2. Systematic review 30 2.1 Systematic review methods 30 2.2 Scope of the review 30 2.3 Search strategy 31 2.4 Inclusion Criteria 31 2.5 Exclusion Criteria 31 2.6 Data extraction and assessment for study inclusion 31 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Induced Abortion and Mental Health
    INDUCED ABORTION AND MENTAL HEALTH A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE MENTAL HEALTH OUTCOMES OF INDUCED ABORTION, INCLUDING THEIR PREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS. DECEMBER 2011 Developed for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges by National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, London, 2011 This review was funded by the Department of Health The National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH) was established in 2001 at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, in partnership with the British Psychological Society. Its primary role is to develop evidence-based mental health reviews and clinical guidelines CONTENTS Steering Group Members................................................,............................................................................................05 Executive summary.......................................................................................................................................................07 1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................09 1.1 Background...........................................................................................................................................................................09 1.2 Terminology...........................................................................................................................................................................11 1.3 Abortion Legislation..............................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • World-Abortion-Map.Pdf
    I PROHIBITED ALTOGETHER II TO SAVE THE WOMAN’S LIFE III TO PRESERVE HEALTH GREENLAND The World’s IV BROAD SOCIAL OR ECONOMIC GROUNDS FINLAND V ON REQUEST (GESTATIONAL LIMITS VARY) ICELAND SWEDEN RUSSIAN FEDERATION UNKNOWN CANADA NORWAY Abortion ESTONIA LATVIA NORTHERN IRELAND DENMARK LITHUANIA NETHERLANDS IRELAND GREAT BELARUS BRITAIN GERMANY POLAND BELGIUM CZECH LUXEMBOURG UKRAINE REPUBLIC KAZAKHSTAN SLOVAK REP. MONGOLIA LIECHTENSTEIN AUSTRIA Laws SWITZERLAND HUNGARY MOLDOVA SLOVENIA FRANCE CROATIA ROMANIA ITALY SAN BOSNIA SERBIA MONACO MARINO HERZ. DEM. PEOPLE’S MONTENEGRO BULGARIA UNITED STATES ANDORRA KOSOVO GEORGIA UZBEKISTAN KYRGYZSTAN REP. OF KOREA How many women of reproductive age N. MACEDONIA PORTUGAL ALBANIA ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN SPAIN TURKMENISTAN REP. OF JAPAN TURKEY TAJIKISTAN KOREA live in countries under each category? CHINA MALTA GREECE CYPRUS SYRIA LEBANON AFGHANISTAN WEST BANK/GAZA STRIP MOROCCO TUNISIA IRAN ISRAEL IRAQ JORDAN KUWAIT NEPAL PAKISTAN BHUTAN BAHAMAS ALGERIA LIBYA QATAR MEXICO EGYPT BAHRAIN CUBA WEST SAUDI ARABIA BANGLADESH TAIWAN SAHARA UAE INDIA HONG KONG OMAN MYANMAR DOMINICAN REPUBLIC LAOS SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS MAURITANIA III BELIZE HAITI MALI JAMAICA PUERTO ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA NIGER RICO SUDAN THAILAND PHILIPPINES HONDURAS DOMINICA CAPE VERDE II 237 MILLION ERITREA YEMEN GUATEMALA SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CHAD NICARAGUA SAINT LUCIA SENEGAL EL SALVADOR ARUBA BARBADOS GAMBIA CAMBODIA 359 MILLION 14% CURAÇAO BURKINA GRENADA GUINEA-BISSAU FASO DJIBOUTI VIETNAM COSTA RICA PANAMA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO GUINEA BENIN MARSHALL ISLANDS 22% MICRONESIA NIGERIA SOMALIA SRI LANKA VENEZUELA ETHIOPIA SIERRA LEONE COTE TOGO CENTRAL D’IVOIRE SOUTH PALAU SURINAME GHANA AFRICAN SUDAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM GUYANA LIBERIA REP. CAMEROON MALAYSIA COLOMBIA KIRIBATI MALDIVES EQUATORIAL GUINEA UGANDA SINGAPORE WOMEN OF SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE 90 MILLION IV DEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967
    House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967 Twelfth Report of Session 2006–07 Volume I HC 1045-I House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Scientific Developments Relating to the Abortion Act 1967 Twelfth Report of Session 2006–07 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 29 October 2007 To be published by TSO on 6 November 2007 as HC 1045-I The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of Science and Innovation and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Phil Willis MP (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough) (Chairman) Adam Afriyie MP (Conservative, Windsor) Mrs Nadine Dorries MP (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Mr Robert Flello MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent South) Linda Gilroy MP (Labour, Plymouth Sutton) Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Chris Mole MP (Labour/Co-op, Ipswich) Dr Bob Spink MP (Conservative, Castle Point) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner MP (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/s&tcom A list of Reports from the Committee in this Parliament is included at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee on the Abortion (Northern Ireland) (No
    Submissions to the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee on the Abortion (Northern Ireland) (No. 2) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/503) Lord Alton of Liverpool Page 2 Both Lives Matter Page 6 Lord Brennan QC Page 9 Fiona Bruce MP Page 14 Joanne Bunting CO Page 17 CARE Northern Ireland Page 21 Catholic Bishops of Northern Ireland Page 24 Christian Medical Fellowship Page 27 The Rt Hon. Sir Jeffrey Donaldson MP Page 30 Don’t Screen Us Out Page 32 Paul Givan MLA Page 36 The Rt Hon. Sir John Hayes MP Page 41 The Rt Hon. Sir Edward Leigh MP Page 44 Ian Leist QC Page 47 Carla Lockhart MP Page 51 Dr Calum Miller Page 57 Lord Morrow Page 64 Carol Nolan TD and Senator Rónán Mullen Page 67 NI Voiceless Page 70 Baroness O’Loan Page 73 Presbyterian Church in Ireland Page 76 Right to Life Page 79 1 Lord Alton of Liverpool This submission concerns the Abortion (Northern Ireland) (No. 2) Regulations 2020, laid before Parliament on the 13th May. The points I raise are relevant to the Committee’s terms of reference: 4 (a) ‘that it is politically or legally important or gives rise to issues of public policy likely to be of interest to the House’ because the regulations introduces new forms of discrimination in Northern Ireland; and 4 (d) that ‘it may imperfectly achieve its policy objectives’ because the regulations promote discrimination. Many of the points I make reiterate those made in my submission to you concerning the earlier Abortion (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2020 because these new Regulations replicate the former in most respects.
    [Show full text]