DOCSLIB.ORG

World-Abortion-Map.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World-Abortion-Map.Pdf I PROHIBITED ALTOGETHER II TO SAVE THE WOMAN’S LIFE III TO PRESERVE HEALTH GREENLAND The World’s IV BROAD SOCIAL OR ECONOMIC GROUNDS FINLAND V ON REQUEST (GESTATIONAL LIMITS VARY) ICELAND SWEDEN RUSSIAN FEDERATION UNKNOWN CANADA NORWAY Abortion ESTONIA LATVIA NORTHERN IRELAND DENMARK LITHUANIA NETHERLANDS IRELAND GREAT BELARUS BRITAIN GERMANY POLAND BELGIUM CZECH LUXEMBOURG UKRAINE REPUBLIC KAZAKHSTAN SLOVAK REP. MONGOLIA LIECHTENSTEIN AUSTRIA Laws SWITZERLAND HUNGARY MOLDOVA SLOVENIA FRANCE CROATIA ROMANIA ITALY SAN BOSNIA SERBIA MONACO MARINO HERZ. DEM. PEOPLE’S MONTENEGRO BULGARIA UNITED STATES ANDORRA KOSOVO GEORGIA UZBEKISTAN KYRGYZSTAN REP. OF KOREA How many women of reproductive age N. MACEDONIA PORTUGAL ALBANIA ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN SPAIN TURKMENISTAN REP. OF JAPAN TURKEY TAJIKISTAN KOREA live in countries under each category? CHINA MALTA GREECE CYPRUS SYRIA LEBANON AFGHANISTAN WEST BANK/GAZA STRIP MOROCCO TUNISIA IRAN ISRAEL IRAQ JORDAN KUWAIT NEPAL PAKISTAN BHUTAN BAHAMAS ALGERIA LIBYA QATAR MEXICO EGYPT BAHRAIN CUBA WEST SAUDI ARABIA BANGLADESH TAIWAN SAHARA UAE INDIA HONG KONG OMAN MYANMAR DOMINICAN REPUBLIC LAOS SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS MAURITANIA III BELIZE HAITI MALI JAMAICA PUERTO ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA NIGER RICO SUDAN THAILAND PHILIPPINES HONDURAS DOMINICA CAPE VERDE II 237 MILLION ERITREA YEMEN GUATEMALA SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CHAD NICARAGUA SAINT LUCIA SENEGAL EL SALVADOR ARUBA BARBADOS GAMBIA CAMBODIA 359 MILLION 14% CURAÇAO BURKINA GRENADA GUINEA-BISSAU FASO DJIBOUTI VIETNAM COSTA RICA PANAMA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO GUINEA BENIN MARSHALL ISLANDS 22% MICRONESIA NIGERIA SOMALIA SRI LANKA VENEZUELA ETHIOPIA SIERRA LEONE COTE TOGO CENTRAL D’IVOIRE SOUTH PALAU SURINAME GHANA AFRICAN SUDAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM GUYANA LIBERIA REP. CAMEROON MALAYSIA COLOMBIA KIRIBATI MALDIVES EQUATORIAL GUINEA UGANDA SINGAPORE WOMEN OF SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE 90 MILLION IV DEM. REP. KENYA OF CONGO NAURU KIRIBATI REPRODUCTIVE AGE ECUADOR GABON 5% 386 MILLION RWANDA I WORLDWIDE BURUNDI CONGO (BRAZZAVILLE) 23% SEYCHELLES INDONESIA TANZANIA PAPUA NEW GUINEA SOLOMON ISLANDS PERU BRAZIL TIMOR LESTE COMOROS ANGOLA MOZAMBIQUE ZAMBIA MALAWI TUVALU SAMOA BOLIVIA V ZIMBABWE MADAGASCAR VANUATU FIJI MAURITIUS 590 MILLION NAMIBIA BOTSWANA PARAGUAY 36% TONGA ESWATINI AUSTRALIA LESOTHO SOUTH AFRICA URUGUAY © Center for Reproductive Rights ARGENTINA The Center for Reproductive Rights is a nonprofit legal CHILE advocacy organization dedicated to promoting and defending women’s reproductive rights worldwide. 199 Water St, Floor 22 New York, NY 10038 NEW ZEALAND reproductiverights.org Current as of April 26, 2019 Map updated in real time at worldabortionlaws.org Categories of Abortion Laws from Most to Least Restrictive Countries in each subsequent category recognize the grounds specified in the preceding category. Additional enumerated grounds are indicated following the country name. Category I.I. ProhibitedProhibited Altogether Altogether Category II.II. ToTo Save Save the the Woman’s Woman’s Life Life Category III.III. ToTo Preserve Preserve Health Health Category IV.IV. SocioeconomicBroad Social or Grounds Economic Grounds Category V. On Request (Gestational Limits Vary) Indicators 2623 COUNTRIES 39 COUNTRIES 5663 COUNTRIES 14 COUNTRIES 6466 COUNTRIES The laws of the countries in this category do not permit abortion under any The laws of the countries in this category permit abortion when the woman’s life The laws of countries in this category permit abortion on the basis of health or These laws are generally interpreted liberally to permit abortion under a broad All Countries in Category V have gestational limits of 12 weeks unless R Abortion permitted in cases of rape circumstances, including when the woman’s life or health is at risk. is at risk. therapeutic grounds. Countries in bold explicitly permit abortion to preserve the range of circumstances. These countries often take into account a woman's actual otherwise indicated. I Abortion permitted in cases of incest woman’s mental health. Countries with a permit abortion only when the or reasonably foreseeable environment and her social or economic circumstances W8 Gestational limit of 8 weeks D90 Gestational limit of 90 days or three months Andorra Afghanistan South Sudan F Abortion permitted in cases of fetal impairment woman's physical health is at risk. The World Health Organization advises that in considering the potential impact of pregnancy and childbearing. W10 Gestational limit of 10 weeks D120 Gestational limit of 120 days Aruba Antigua & Barbuda Sri Lanka W14 Gestational limit of 14 weeks ∞ Law does not limit pre-viability abortion SA Spousal authorization required Congo (Brazzaville) Bahrain Sudan: R countries permitting abortion on health grounds should interpret “health” to W18 Gestational limit of 18 weeks º Law does not indicate gestational limit; regulatory mechanisms vary Curaçao Bangladesh Syria: SA, PA Barbados: R, I, F, PA W24 Gestational limit of 24 weeks Supreme Court precedent protects the right to abortion pre-viability; PA Parental authorization/notification required mean “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely gestational limits vary at state level Dominican Republic Bhutan: R, I, + Tanzania Belize: F the absence of disease or infirmity.” + Abortion permitted on additional enumerated grounds relating to Egypt Brazil: R, + Timor-Leste: PA Ethiopia: R, I, F, + Albania: PA Greece: PA Puerto Rico∞ such factors as the woman’s age or capacity to care for a child El Salvador Fiji: R, I, F, PA Armenia: PA Guinea-Bissauº W14 Brunei Darussalam Tuvalu Romania W8 Gabon Chile: R, F Uganda Algeria Gambia Peru Finland: R, I, F, + Australia: Guyana Russian Fed. SX Sex-selective abortion prohibited Great Britain: F D90 Haiti Côte d’Ivoire United Arab Emirates (UAE): F, SA, Angola: R, I, F Ghana: R, I, F, + Poland: R, I, F, PA Austria Hungary Sao Tome & Principe Legislation explicitly permits abortion only to protect the physical Honduras Dominica PA Argentina: R Grenada Qatar: F Hong Kong: R, I, F Azerbaijan Ireland Serbia: PA D90 Iraq Bahamas Guinea: R, I, F Rep. of Korea: R, I, SA, + Iceland: R, I, F, + Belarus Italy W24 health of the woman Guatemala Venezuela Singapore W14 Jamaica Indonesia: R, F, SA Yemen: SA Benin: R, I, F Israel: R, I, F, + Saint Kitts & Nevis India: R, F, PA Belgium Kazakhstan Slovak Rep.: PA Law unclear W10 Laos Iran: F Bolivia: R, I Jordan Saint Lucia: R, I Japan: R, SA Bosnia-Herzegovina: PA Kosovo : PA, SX Slovenia: PA Federal system in which abortion law is determined at state level; Madagascar Kiribati Botswana: R, I, F Kenya Samoa Rwanda: R, I, F, + Bulgaria Kyrgyzstan South Africa W14 Malta Lebanon Burkina Faso: R, I, F Kuwait: F, SA, PA Saudi Arabia: SA, PA Saint Vincent & Grenadines: R, I, F Cambodia : PA Latvia: PA SpainW14: PA classification reflects legal status of abortion for largest group Marshall Islands: Libya Burundi Lesotho: R, I, F Seychelles: R, I, F, + Taiwan: I, F, SA, PA Canada° Lithuania: PA SwedenW18 of people W14 Mauritania Malawi Cameroon: R Liberia: R, I, F Thailand: R, F Zambia: F Cape Verde Luxembourg Switzerland D120 Nicaragua Mali: R, I Central African Rep.: R, I, F, +, Liechtenstein: R, PA, + Togo: R, I, F China°: SX Maldives Tajikistan W10 Palau: Chad: R, I, F Malaysia Trinidad & Tobago Croatia : PA Moldova: PA D90 Mexico: R, F, Tunisia D90 Philippines Micronesia: , Colombia: R, I, F Mauritius: R, I, F, PA Vanuatu Cuba: PA Mongolia TurkeyW10: SA, PA San Marino Myanmar Comoros Monaco: R, I, F, Zimbabwe: R, I, F, Cyprus Montenegro: PA, SX Turkmenistan Senegal Nigeria Costa Rica Morocco: SA Czech Rep.: PA Mozambique Ukraine Sierra Leone Oman Dem. Rep. of Congo: R, I, F Namibia: R, I, F Dem. People’s Rep. of Korea° Nepal: SX United States: PA, ∞ Suriname Panama: R, F, PA Djibouti Nauru: R, I, F, + Denmark: PA Netherlands Uruguay: PA Tonga Papua New Guinea Ecuador: + New Zealand: I, F Estonia North Macedonia (formerly Uzbekistan W14 West Bank & Gaza Strip Paraguay Equatorial Guinea: SA, PA Niger: F France Macedonia): PA Vietnam° Solomon Islands Eritrea: R, I, + Northern Ireland Georgia: PA Norway: PA Somalia Eswatini (formerly Swaziland): R, I, F Pakistan GermanyW14 PortugalW10: PA .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States (2018)
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/24950 SHARE The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States (2018) DETAILS 222 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-46818-3 | DOI 10.17226/24950 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S.; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Board on Health Care Services; Health and Medicine Division; National FIND RELATED TITLES Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2018. The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24950. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. The Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the United States THE SAFETY AND QUALITY OF ABORTION CARE IN THE UNITED STATES Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S. Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice Board on Health Care Services Health and Medicine Division A Consensus Study Report of Copyright National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reproductive Right, Or a Moral Profligacy?
    A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHT, OR A MORAL PROFLIGACY? A POLICY PAPER DISCUSSING THE LEGISLATIVE FUTURE FOR MALTA An Għaqda Studenti Tal-Liġi Policy Paper © Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi 2020 OPENING REMARKS INTRODUCTION It is with great pleasure that I present A multidisciplinary modus operandi was to you this year’s GħSL policy paper employed to offer a holistic discussion addressing the subject of Abortion, a and this was achieved through a paper which is the culmination of the thorough examination of pertinent comprehensive work of the GħSL Policy areas beyond the legal sphere such as Office. medical research, ethical considerations involved, as well as the psychological GħSL strives to keep law students as aspects, among others. well as society as a whole abreast regarding current legal issues in Malta. Moreover, a comparative exercise was An ongoing area of contention featuring carried out, whereby the laws regulating, across local media centres around the restricting and prohibiting abortion were topic of abortion. Due to the polarised evaluated. This contributed towards a views on this subject, the GħSL comprehensive outcome of this policy Executive Board decided that it would paper and provided a robust reference be opportune to delve into this topic. point for active and potential students alike. As a body representing the interests of law students, throughout this paper our Finally, I would like to thank the main focus was to maintain and uphold colleagues of GħSL, including all those an impartial appreciation of the law who contributed to this paper, namely while taking into account the sensitive Dr Desiree Attard, Andrew Sciberras, nature of this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abortion Rights Debate
    Volume | 402 Justin Healey Edited by Rights Debate The Abortion The VOLUME 402 THE ABORTION RIGHTS DEBATE ISSUES IN SOCIETY Volume | Volume The Abortion 402 Rights Debate Edited by Justin Healey This e-book is subject to the terms and conditions of a non-exclusive and non-transferable SITE LICENCE AGREEMENT between THE SPINNEY PRESS and: St Peter's Collegiate Girls School, Stonyfell, [email protected] First published by PO Box 438 Thirroul NSW 2515 Australia www.spinneypress.com.au © The Spinney Press 2016. COPYRIGHT All rights reserved. Other than for purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior permission. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher. REPRODUCTION AND COMMUNICATION FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES The Australian Copyright Act 1968 (the Act) allows a maximum of one chapter or 10% of the pages of this work, whichever is the greater, to be reproduced and/or communicated by any educational institution for its educational purposes provided that the educational institution (or the body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. For details of the CAL licence for educational institutions contact: Copyright Agency Limited, Level 11, 66 Goulburn Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 9394 7600 Fax: (02) 9394 7601 Email: [email protected] REPRODUCTION AND COMMUNICATION FOR OTHER PURPOSES Except as permitted under the Act (for example a fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review) no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, communicated or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion and the Law in New
    NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Abortion and the law in New South Wales by Talina Drabsch Briefing Paper No 9/05 ISSN 1325-4456 ISBN 0 7313 1784 X August 2005 © 2005 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Abortion and the law in New South Wales by Talina Drabsch NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE David Clune (MA, PhD, Dip Lib), Manager..............................................(02) 9230 2484 Gareth Griffith (BSc (Econ) (Hons), LLB (Hons), PhD), Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government / Law .........................(02) 9230 2356 Talina Drabsch (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Law ......................(02) 9230 2768 Lenny Roth (BCom, LLB), Research Officer, Law ...................................(02) 9230 3085 Stewart Smith (BSc (Hons), MELGL), Research Officer, Environment ...(02) 9230 2798 John Wilkinson (MA, PhD), Research Officer, Economics.......................(02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author. Information about Research Publications can be found on the Internet at: www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/WEB_FEED/PHWebContent.nsf/PHPages/LibraryPublications Advice on
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Review of Laws on Induced Abortion, 1985–1997 by Anika Rahman, Laura Katzive and Stanley K
    ARTICLES A Global Review of Laws on Induced Abortion, 1985–1997 By Anika Rahman, Laura Katzive and Stanley K. Henshaw and the Annual Review of Population Law Context: The legal status of induced abortion helps determine the availability of safe, afford- (published by the United Nations Popula- able abortion services in a country, which in turn influences rates of maternal mortality and mor- tion Fund and the Harvard Law School). bidity. It is important, therefore, for health professionals to know both the current status of abor- In addition, we derived extensive infor- tion laws worldwide and the extent to which those laws are changing. mation regarding the interpretation of na- Methods: Abortion-related laws in 152 nations and dependent territories with populations of tional laws from a series of books entitled one million or more were reviewed, and changes in these laws since 1985 were documented. Abortion Policies: A Global Review, which were published between 1992 and 1995 by Results: Currently, 61% of the world’s people live in countries where induced abortion is per- the Population Division of the United Na- mitted either for a wide range of reasons or without restriction as to reason; in contrast, 25% re- tions Department for Economic and Social side in nations where abortion is generally prohibited. However, even in countries with highly re- Information and Policy Analysis. Finally, strictive laws, induced abortion is usually permitted when the woman’s life is endangered; in previously published works on abortion contrast, even in nations with very liberal laws, access may be limited by gestational age re- laws in Commonwealth countries2 and on strictions, requirements that third parties authorize an abortion or limitations on the types of fa- abortion laws in Francophone countries3 cilities that perform induced abortions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Access to Safe Abortion Supplies
    eport R Ensuring Access to Safe Abortion Supplies Landscaping of barriers and opportunities Heather Clark Saumya RamaRao John Townsend MAY 2017 MAY The Population Council confronts critical health and development issues—from stopping the spread of HIV to improving reproductive health and ensuring that young people lead full and productive lives. Through biomedical, social science, and public health research in 50 countries, we work with our partners to deliver solutions that lead to more effective policies, programs, and technologies that improve lives around the world. Established in 1952 and headquartered in New York, the Council is a nongovernmental, nonprofit organization governed by an international board of trustees. Population Council One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza www.popcouncil.org © 2017 The Population Council, Inc. Table of Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................. 2 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinton Administration's Promotion of Abortion at the 1994 Cairo Conference and the Strength of the Islamic Response
    Rumage: Resisting the West: The Clinton Administration's Promotion of Abo CALIFORNIA WESTERN INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 27 FALL 1996 NUMBER 1 RESISTING THE WEST: THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION'S PROMOTION OF ABORTION AT THE 1994 CAIRO CONFERENCE AND THE STRENGTH OF THE ISLAMIC RESPONSE SARAH A. RUMAGE" "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean-neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master-that's all."' "Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he who is truly the lawgiver, to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first spoke or wrote them. "2 INTRODUCTION Who makes the law, and who decides what the law means? For modem lawyers, the true riddle is not in the actors' identification, but whether these are different questions involving different actors, or instead the same question involving the same actors. For theologians, however, the question may even signify the dividing point between God and man. And until quite recently, * B.A., University of Miami (Florida) in anthropology, 1976; J.D., New York Law School, 1982; M.A. in history, 1993; LL.M. Temple University School of Law, 1996; Ph.D. candidate at John Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. I wish to thank Professor Fouad Ajami for his helpful comments and encouragement, Professor Imad-Ad-Dean Ahmad for his great patience and critical eye, Professor Robert Gurland for opening the world of philosophical ethics to me, and especially my students at Temple University School of Law, who never failed to make me think.
    [Show full text]
  • Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy As a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion Peter B
    Online Journal of Health Ethics Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 4 Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy as a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion Peter B. Bisong [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://aquila.usm.edu/ojhe Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Bisong, P. B. (2016). Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy as a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion. Online Journal of Health Ethics, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.1201.04 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Journal of Health Ethics by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Noetic Propaedeutic Pedagogy as a Panacea to the Problem of Abortion Introduction Abortion has over the years posed ethical, medical, political and legal problems in the world and in Nigeria in particular. These problems (such as, danger to health, psychological trauma, unnecessary economic cost, population depletion etc) have been and have continued to be fuelled by the pro-abortionists supportive arguments. The pro-abortionists argue that abortion is good because it brings financial benefits to medical practitioners; it preserves the life of the mother when in danger; it controls population and enables the couple to live a more comfortable and meaningful life amongst other reasons. Unfortunately these arguments seem to have taken root in the heart of Nigerians, for only this will explain why Nigerians still perform abortion en masse in spite of the current illegality status of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Estimation and Scenario-Based Projections of Sex Ratio at Birth and Missing Female Births Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Time Series Mixture Model
    Global estimation and scenario-based projections of sex ratio at birth and missing female births using a Bayesian hierarchical time series mixture model Fengqing Chao*1, Patrick Gerland2, Alex R. Cook3, and Leontine Alkema4 1Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia 2Population Estimates and Projections Section, United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, NY, USA 3Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 4Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA December 1, 2020 Abstract The sex ratio at birth (SRB) is defined as the ratio of male to female live births. The SRB imbalance in parts of the world over the past several decades is a direct consequence of sex-selective abortion, driven by the co-existence of son preference, readily available technology of prenatal sex determination, and fertility decline. Estimation and projection of the degree of SRB imbalance is complicated because of variability in SRB reference levels and because of the uncertainty associated with SRB observations. We develop Bayesian hierarchical time series mixture models for SRB estimation and scenario-based projections for all countries from 1950 to 2100. We model the SRB regional and national reference levels, and the fluctuation around national reference levels. We identify countries at risk of SRB imbalances and model both (i) the absence or presence of sex ratio transitions in such countries and, if present, (ii) the transition process.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Facts and Figures 2021
    ABORTION FACTS & FIGURES 2021 ABORTION FACTS & FIGURES TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE Introduction . 1 Global Overview . 2 African Overview . 4 By the Numbers . 6 Maternal Health . .9 Safe Abortion . 11 Unsafe Abortion . 13 Post-Abortion Care . 15 Contraception . 17 Unmet Need for Family Planning . 22 Abortion Laws and Policies . 24. PART TWO Glossary . 28 Appendix I: International Conventions . 30. Appendix II: How Unsafe Abortions Are Counted . 32 Appendix III: About the Sources . .33 Regional Data for Africa . 34 Regional Data for Asia . 44 Regional Data for Latin America and the Caribbean . 54. POPULATION REFERENCE BUREAU Population Reference Bureau INFORMS people around the world about population, health, and the environment, and EMPOWERS them to use that information to ADVANCE the well-being of current and future generations . This guide was written by Deborah Mesce, former PRB program director, international media training . The graphic designer was Sean Noyce . Thank you to Alana Barton, director of media programs; AÏssata Fall, senior policy advisor; Charlotte Feldman-Jacobs, former associate vice president; Kate P . Gilles, former program director; Tess McLoud, policy analyst; Cathryn Streifel, senior policy advisor; and Heidi Worley, senior writer; all at PRB, for their inputs and guidance . Thank you as well to Anneka Van Scoyoc, PRB senior graphic designer, for guiding the design process . © 2021 Population Reference Bureau . All rights reserved . This publication is available in print and on PRB’s website . To become a PRB member or to order PRB materials, contact us at: 1875 Connecticut Ave ., NW, Suite 520 Washington, DC 20009-5728 PHONE: 1-800-877-9881 E-MAIL: communications@prb .org WEB: www .prb .org For permission to reproduce parts of this publication, contact PRB at permissions@prb org.
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers to Safe and Legal Abortion in South Africa
    BRIEFINGBRIEFING Barriers to Safe and Legal Abortion in South Africa © Amnesty International Amnesty International is a global movement of We are independent of any government, political more than 7 million people who campaign for a ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded world where human rights are enjoyed by all. mainly by our membership and public donations. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. 2 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL BRIEFING: BARRIERS TO SAFE AND LEGAL ABORTION IN SOUTH AFRICA 3 CONTENTS The South African Government’s The South African government’s human rights obligation to ensure access to safe and legal abortion services in South Africa …..........................................................…. 3 Human Rights Obligation Human Rights Framework ………………........….....……………. 7 The Failure to regulate Conscientious Objection …….......…..… 8 to Ensure Access to Safe and Inequality of Access to Services …………..…...............………..12 The Right to Access Information ……...……….........…………. 14 Conclusion and Recommendations ………......….........………..17 Legal Abortion Services Annex 1: South Africa's Human Rights Obligations in Relation to Access to Abortion ..................................... 20 Amnesty International Publications First published in 2017 by ACCESS TO SAFE AND LEGAL ABORTION SAVES LIVES Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House The World Health Organisation (WHO) is clear that access to safe abortion is a key step for avoiding maternal 1 Easton Street deaths and injuries.1 In contrast, restrictive access to abortion services violates numerous human rights, London WC1X 0DW including the right to life, health, privacy, and to be free from discrimination, torture and ill-treatment. United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Abortion has been legal in South Africa for almost twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaintiff S99/2016 V Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Another
    243 FCR] PLAINTIFF S99/2016 v MNR FOR IMMIGRATION 17 FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Plaintiff S99/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Another [2016] FCA 483 Bromberg J 28, 29 April, 6 May 2016 Private International Law — Choice of law — Torts — Proper law — Where putative duty of care required Minister of the Commonwealth to procure a safe and lawful abortion for a person assessed as a refugee offshore — Abortion made available in Papua New Guinea — Where apprehended breach of duty an omission to procure an abortion that is safe and lawful — Whether proper law of apprehended negligence the law of Australia or the law of Papua New Guinea. Torts — Negligence — Duty of care — Unauthorised maritime arrival claimed refugee status having been transferred to Republic of Nauru — Found to be refugee and temporarily settled — Where rape occurred causing pregnancy and physical and psychological harm — Where dependence upon Commonwealth of Australia for financial and medical needs — Where abortion only able to be procured with the assistance of the Commonwealth — Whether duty of care to exercise reasonable care to procure a safe and lawful abortion — Consideration of whether Commonwealth voluntarily assumed responsibility for refugee — Consideration of statutory scheme giving rise to relationship between refugee and Commonwealth and refugee’s continued presence on Nauru — Whether higher standard for the imposition of a duty of care on public authorities applicable to foreign public authorities — Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 198AA,
    [Show full text]