DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment, Belle Ayr Mine Campbell County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment, Belle Ayr Mine Campbell County United States Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Environmental Assessment Belle Ayr Mine Campbell County, Wyoming Mining Plan Modification for Federal Coal Lease WYW161248 June 2017 Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Program Support Division 1999 Broadway, Suite 3320 Denver, CO 80202 PH: 303-293-5000 / FAX: 303-293-5032 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Site History ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Project Background............................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.3 Statutory and Regulatory Background ............................................................................ 1-6 1.3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................ 1-9 1.3.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1-9 1.3.2 Need ....................................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.4 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, and Other Agency Plans ......................................... 1-9 1.4.1 Statutes and Regulations .................................................................................................... 1-9 1.4.2 Other Agency Plans .......................................................................................................... 1-11 1.5 Authorizing Actions .................................................................................................................... 1-11 1.6 Outreach and Issues ................................................................................................................... 1-12 1.7 Crosswalk of Resource Areas .................................................................................................. 1-12 1.8 Public Involvement ...................................................................................................................... 1-12 2.0 Proposed Action & Alternatives ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Belle Ayr Mine WDEQ-LQD Permit ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Project Area ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Description of Existing Mining and Reclamation Operations .............................................. 2-1 2.3.1 Current Bonding and Bond Release Status ................................................................... 2-2 2.3.2 BAM Support Facilities ....................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.3 Power Plants Supplied by the BAM ................................................................................. 2-4 2.4 Description of Alternatives ......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.1 Proposed Action .................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.4.2 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................ 2-6 2.4.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated ........................................................................ 2-6 2.4.3.1 Underground Mining Alternative ................................................................................. 2-7 2.4.3.2 Air Quality Mitigation Alternatives .............................................................................. 2-8 2.4.3.3 Mining Plan with Reduced Disturbance Alternatives ............................................... 2-8 2.4.4 Project Environmental Protection and Mitigation Features ....................................... 2-9 Belle Ayr North Federal Mining Plan Modification EA for Permit No. PT0214 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 2.4.4.1 Topography ....................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.4.2 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.4.3 Water Resources ............................................................................................................. 2-9 2.4.4.4 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................ 2-10 2.4.4.5 Terrestrial Wildlife ........................................................................................................ 2-10 2.4.4.6 Threatened and Endangered Species ......................................................................... 2-11 2.4.4.7 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 2-11 2.4.4.8 Visual Resources ............................................................................................................ 2-11 2.4.4.9 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 2-11 2.4.4.10 Post-mining Land Use ................................................................................................... 2-12 3.0 Affected Environment .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 National and Wyoming Ambient Air Quality Standards ............................................ 3-3 3.1.2 Attainment/Non-Attainment Area Designations ......................................................... 3-3 3.1.3 Background ........................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.1.4 Existing Belle Ayr Mine Air Quality Summary .............................................................. 3-6 3.1.4.1 Air Quality-Monitoring Values ...................................................................................... 3-6 3.1.4.2 Air Quality Related Values (AQRVs) ........................................................................ 3-12 3.1.4.3 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)............................................................................... 3-12 3.1.4.4 Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) and Climate Change .................................................. 3-14 3.2 Water Resources ........................................................................................................................ 3-15 3.2.1 Groundwater ...................................................................................................................... 3-15 3.2.2 Surface Water .................................................................................................................... 3-19 3.2.3 Water Rights ...................................................................................................................... 3-21 3.3 Wildlife .......................................................................................................................................... 3-23 3.3.1 Raptors ................................................................................................................................ 3-24 3.3.2 Greater Sage-Grouse (GRSG) ........................................................................................ 3-24 3.3.3 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species, and Special Status Species ..... 3-26 3.3.3.1 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species ................................................... 3-26 3.3.3.2 Vertebrate Sensitive Species ....................................................................................... 3-27 3.3.3.2.1 BLM Sensitive Species ............................................................................................ 3-27 3.3.3.2.2 USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern ........................................................... 3-30 Belle Ayr North Federal Mining Plan Modification EA for Permit No. PT0214 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 3.4 Transportation ............................................................................................................................. 3-31 3.5 Socioeconomics ........................................................................................................................... 3-32 3.5.1 Local Economy ...................................................................................................................... 3-32 3.5.2 Population ........................................................................................................................... 3-32 3.5.3 Employment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alpha Coal Handbook 2
    201 2 2 Alpha Coal Handbook Alpha Coal Handbook A reference guide for coal, ironmaking, electricity generation, and emissions control technologies. 2012 Edition Forward-Looking Statements Statements in this document which are not statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are not guarantees of future per- formance. Many factors could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Who Is Alpha? These factors are discussed in detail in our filings with the SEC. We make forward-looking statements based on currently available information, and we assume no obligation to update the statements made herein due to changes in underlying Alpha Natural Resources is one of the world’s premier coal suppliers factors, new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as required by law. with coal production capacity of greater than 120 million tons a Third Party Information This document, including certain forward-looking statements herein, includes information obtained from third party year. Alpha is the United States’ leading supplier of metallurgical sources that we believe to be reliable. However, we have not independently verified this third party information and cannot coal used in the steelmaking process and third-largest in the world. assure you of its accuracy or completeness. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding any third party data contained in this document, such data involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, Alpha is also a major supplier of thermal coal to electric utilities including those discussed in detail in our filings with the SEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities to Expedite the Construction of New Coal-Based Power Plants
    Opportunities to Expedite the Construction of New Coal-Based Power Plants Chair: Thomas G. Kraemer Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. Vice Chair: Georgia Nelson Midwest Generation EME, LLC Study Co-Chairs: Robert Card U.S. Undersecretary of Energy Dr. E. Linn Draper, Jr. American Electric Power Co. Technical Work Group Chair: Michael J. Mudd American Electric Power Co. Library of Congress Catalog # 2005920127 THE NATIONAL COAL COUNCIL Thomas G. Kraemer, Chairman Robert A. Beck, Executive Director U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Spencer Abraham, Secretary of Energy Opportunities to Expedite the Construction of New Coal-Based Power Plants 2 National Coal Council Report OPPORTUNITIES TO EXPEDITE THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW COAL-BASED POWER PLANTS Table of Contents Preface..............................................................................................................................................i Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................ii Principal Contributors .................................................................................................................iv Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction................................................................................................................. 7 Section 2: Technology Choices and Economics.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sagebrush Establishment on Mine Lands
    2000 Billings Land Reclamation Symposium BIG SAGEBRUSH (ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA) COMMUNITIES - ECOLOGY, IMPORTANCE AND RESTORATION POTENTIAL Stephen B. Monsen and Nancy L. Shaw Abstract Big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) is the most common and widespread sagebrush species in the Intermountain region. Climatic patterns, elevation gradients, soil characteristics and fire are among the factors regulating the distribution of its three major subspecies. Each of these subspecies is considered a topographic climax dominant. Reproductive strategies of big sagebrush subspecies have evolved that favor the development of both regional and localized populations. Sagebrush communities are extremely valuable natural resources. They provide ground cover and soil stability as well as habitat for various ungulates, birds, reptiles and invertebrates. Species composition of these communities is quite complex and includes plants that interface with more arid and more mesic environments. Large areas of big sagebrush rangelands have been altered by destructive grazing, conversion to introduced perennial grasses through artificial seeding and invasion of annual weeds, principally cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). Dried cheatgrass forms continuous mats of fine fuels that ignite and burn more frequently than native herbs. As a result, extensive tracts of sagebrush between the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains are rapidly being converted to annual grasslands. In some areas recent introductions of perennial weeds are now displacing the annuals. The current weed invasions and their impacts on native ecosystems are recent ecological events of unprecedented magnitude. Restoration of degraded big sagebrush communities and reduction of further losses pose major challenges to land managers. Loss of wildlife habitat and recent invasion of perennial weeds into seedings of introduced species highlight the need to stem losses and restore native vegetation where possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Changes in the Coal Industry and Implications for the Pawnee
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO Docket No. 11A-325E _____________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR THE PAWNEE EMISSIONS CONTROL PROJECT ________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE OF CHANGES IN THE COAL INDUSTRY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PAWNEE EMISSIONS CONTROL PROJECT _____________________________________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 2 III. RECENT CHANGES IN THE COAL INDUSTRY ........................................................................ 4 A. PATRIOT COAL FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY ON JULY 9, 2012 ............................................................. 5 B. ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES—A KEY SUPPLIER TO THE PAWNEE COAL PLANT—ALSO HAS SERIOUS FINANCIAL PROBLEMS.......................................................................................................... 6 C. ARCH COAL INC —OWNER OF THE LARGEST US COAL MINE, THE BLACK THUNDER MINE— ALSO HAS SERIOUS FINANCIAL PROBLEMS ...................................................................................... 16 D. OTHER US COAL COMPANIES ARE GENERALLY SUBJECT TO THE SAME GEOLOGICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Belle Ayr 2000 Federal Coal Lease Application Environmental Assessment (WYW151133)
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Environmental Assessments (WY) Wyoming 2001 Belle Ayr 2000 Federal Coal Lease Application Environmental Assessment (WYW151133) United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wyoming_enviroassess Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, "Belle Ayr 2000 Federal Coal Lease Application Environmental Assessment (WYW151133)" (2001). Environmental Assessments (WY). Paper 16. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wyoming_enviroassess/16 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Wyoming at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Assessments (WY) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. O?~1-£-/tJ u.s. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Casper Field Office April 2001 Belle Ayr 2000 Federal Coal Lease Application Environmental Assessment (WYW1S1133) MISSION STATEMENT It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BUllWYIPLo01JOO1+ 1320 NOTE TO READERS: This final EA is being published in abbreviated format. Reviewers will need the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Belle Ayr 2000 coal lease Application, BlM, December, 2000, for review of the complete EA. Copies of the Draft EA may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Casper Field Office, Attn: Nancy Doelger, 2987 Prospector Dri'~e, Casper, WY 82604 Phone: 307-261-7627 e-roail: Attn: Nancy Doelger at "casper_ [email protected]" fax: Attn: Nancy Doelger at (307)-261-7587 United States Department of the Interior BlJREAU OF lA.1'.JD MANAGEMEl':T Casper Field Offi ce 2987 Prospector Drive Casper.
    [Show full text]
  • A Culture of Safety
    A CULTURE OF SAFETY Wyoming’s mines, operating leaner and more efficient than ever, Safety is a core cultural value for Wyoming’s coal mining industry, remain America’s low-cost industry leaders. Home to seven of and Wyoming coal mines are recognized as some of the safest min- the nation’s top 10 producing mines, Wyoming provides about 40 ing operations in the nation. Safe mines are productive mines, and percent of all coal used for electricity production in the nation. the Wyoming coal industry is committed to providing a safe working That translates to about 12 percent of U.S. domestic electric power environment for all employees and contractors. generation. In total, Wyoming produced over 316 million tons of coal in 2017, up 6.4 percent from 2016. All Wyoming coal mines employ dedicated safety professionals, and all employees are trained in proper safety practices to foster a safe WYOMING’S COAL RESOURCES work environment and build and maintain the culture of safety. Wyoming is home to over 1.4 trillion tons of total coal resources • All new employees attend 40 hours of safety training prior to in seams ranging in thickness from 5 feet to some in excess of 200 their first day on the job. feet in the Powder River Basin (PRB). Recent estimates from the • All employees participate regularly in safety refresher training. Wyoming Geological Survey give Wyoming more than 165 billion • Every shift starts with safety briefings and walk-around inspections. tons of recoverable coal. While other regions of the country also • Employees earn safety bonuses to encourage safe and vigilant hold considerable resources, Wyoming’s position as the nation’s work practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Natural Resources Selects Plum Energy to Supply LNG for Eagle Butte Mine Haul Trucks
    Alpha Natural Resources Selects Plum Energy To Supply LNG for Eagle Butte Mine Haul Trucks BRISTOL, Va., Sept. 19, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (NYSE: ANR), announced today that Plum Energy LLC will construct a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant on property adjacent to Alpha Coal West Inc.'s Eagle Butte Mine, near Gillette, Wyoming. The Plum Energy facility will supply LNG to Alpha Coal West's mine haul vehicles, producing cost efficiencies and fuel savings for its mining operations. Natural gas becomes LNG when the gas is cooled to more than 260 degrees below zero and the volume becomes 1/600th of the gaseous form, turning the gas into a liquid fuel. LNG is a clean, efficient fuel and is extremely attractive from a price point when compared to the cost of conventional diesel fuel. Alpha Coal West began testing LNG technologies developed by GFS Corp. in trucks at the Belle Ayr Mine in 2012, beginning a pilot program of the world's first LNG-powered mine haul trucks. After 18 months of daily operation, Alpha Coal West decided to proceed with the conversion to LNG of its 16 Caterpillar 793 haul trucks at the nearby Eagle Butte Mine. Alpha Coal West expects the alterations to the trucks, each of which is capable of hauling 240-tons of coal, or the equivalent of two railroad cars, to be completed by the end of 2014. Plum Energy's LNG plant at the Eagle Butte Mine, scheduled to come online in March 2015, will be able to produce 28,500 gallons of LNG a day.
    [Show full text]
  • Powder River Basin Coal Resource and Cost Study George Stepanovich, Jr
    Exhibit No. MWR-1 POWDER RIVER BASIN COAL RESOURCE AND COST STUDY Campbell, Converse and Sheridan Counties, Wyoming Big Horn, Powder River, Rosebud and Treasure Counties, Montana Prepared For XCEL ENERGY By John T. Boyd Company Mining and Geological Consultants Denver, Colorado Report No. 3155.001 SEPTEMBER 2011 Exhibit No. MWR-1 John T. Boyd Company Mining and Geological Consultants Chairman James W Boyd October 6, 2011 President and CEO John T Boyd II File: 3155.001 Managing Director and COO Ronald L Lewis Vice Presidents Mr. Mark W. Roberts Richard L Bate Manager, Fuel Supply Operations James F Kvitkovich Russell P Moran Xcel Energy John L Weiss 1800 Larimer St., Suite 1000 William P Wolf Denver, CO 80202 Vice President Business Development Subject: Powder River Basin Coal Resource and Cost Study George Stepanovich, Jr Managing Director - Australia Dear Mr. Roberts: Ian L Alexander Presented herewith is John T. Boyd Company’s (BOYD) draft report Managing Director - China Dehui (David) Zhong on the coal resources mining in the Powder River Basin of Assistant to the President Wyoming and Montana. The report addresses the availability of Mark P Davic resources, the cost of recovery of those resources and forecast FOB mine prices for the coal over the 30 year period from 2011 Denver through 2040. The study is based on information available in the Dominion Plaza, Suite 710S 600 17th Street public domain, and on BOYD’s extensive familiarity and experience Denver, CO 80202-5404 (303) 293-8988 with Powder River Basin operations. (303) 293-2232 Fax jtboydd@jtboyd com Respectfully submitted, Pittsburgh (724) 873-4400 JOHN T.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mine Is a Terrible Thing to Waste: Past, Present and Future Reclamation Efforts to Correct the Environmentally Damaging Effects of Coal Mines
    Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 6 2002 A Mine Is a Terrible Thing to Waste: Past, Present and Future Reclamation Efforts to Correct the Environmentally Damaging Effects of Coal Mines A. Brooke Rubenstein David Winkowski Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons Recommended Citation A. B. Rubenstein & David Winkowski, A Mine Is a Terrible Thing to Waste: Past, Present and Future Reclamation Efforts to Correct the Environmentally Damaging Effects of Coal Mines, 13 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 189 (2002). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj/vol13/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. 2002]Rubenstein and Winkowski: A Mine Is a Terrible Thing to Waste: Past, Present and Future Rec A MINE IS A TERRIBLE THING TO WASTE: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE RECLAMATION EFFORTS TO CORRECT THE ENVIRONMENTALLY DAMAGING EFFECTS OF COAL MINES I. INTRODUCTION Formed 300 million years ago from the remains of vegetation, coal is one of the earliest energy sources known to man.1 Though initially discovered in 1679, commercial coal mining did not begin until 1750.2 Mined in twenty-seven states but found in many more, coal is the most abundant and most used energy source in the United States. 3 Given the current consumption rate, estimates show sufficient amounts of coal exist for use in the Unites States for 4 another 250 to 300 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 05-___ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Steel Mining Company, LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. Virgil Helton, West Virginia Tax Commissioner. _____________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals ____________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ____________ Steven H. Becker Thomas C. Goldstein Paul A. Horowitz (Counsel of Record) Suzanne I. Offerman Amy Howe BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP Kevin K. Russell 1114 Ave. of the Americas GOLDSTEIN & HOWE, P.C. New York, NY 10036 4607 Asbury Pl., NW Washington, DC 20016 Herschel H. Rose III (202) 237-7543 Steven R. Broadwater ROSE LAW OFFICE 500 Virginia St. East Suite 1290 Charleston, WV 25335 March 31, 2006 i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Import-Export Clause of the United States Constitution categorically prohibits a State from imposing a tax on goods in export transit, as this Court held in Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of Equalization, 329 U.S. 69 (1946), or whether, as the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals held below, Richfield Oil has been superseded by this Court’s decisions in Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, Inc., 423 U.S. 276 (1976), and Washington Department of Revenue v. Ass’n of Washington Stevedoring Cos., 435 U.S. 734 (1978). ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW In addition to the parties named in the caption, the following parties appeared below and are petitioners here: Consolidation Coal Company, Laurel Run Mining Company, McElroy Coal Company, Arch Coal, Inc., Mid-Vol Leasing, Inc., Coastal Coal-West Virginia, LLC, Elk Run Coal Company, Inc., Paynter Branch Mining, Inc., Kingston Resources, Inc., Pioneer Fuel Corporation, and Peabody Holding Company, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Contribution of Coal to Tax Revenues in Greene County, PA, 2010-2019
    WHITE PAPER SERIES Changes in the contribution of coal to tax revenues in Greene County, PA, 2010-2019 Caroline White-Nockleby, Mimi Wahid, Caroline Boone, and Benjamin Delhees Sponsored by the MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative Here & Real Project MARCH 2021 WHITE PAPER SERIES: MARCH 2021 Changes in the Contribution of Coal to Tax Revenues in Greene County, PA, 2010-2019 Caroline White-Nocklebya, Mimi Wahidb, Caroline Boonec, and Benjamin Delheesd Abstract • Coal companies have provided a key source of financial support to Greene County not only through employment, but also by contributing to the real estate and mineral value taxes that fund a significant portion of county, township, and school district activities. • Due in part to company closures, tax revenue contributed by coal companies did not keep up with inflation, and in many cases decreased, between the years 2010 and 2019. • Green County’s heavy reliance on coal companies for tax revenue poses a significant risk to its present and future economic health. • These data show that current and projected declines in coal production impact not only employment, but also tax revenues. Declining revenues have the potential to affect all residents and town activities, and may particularly impact vulnerable residents. • Finally, while the coal industry is on the decline, this region has seen an increase in methane gas (also called natural gas) production as part of the shale gas boom. However, because of the structure of the tax base, we show that increases in gas production, and taxes paid by gas companies, are unlikely to make up for lost coal tax revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Selected Gassy Underground Coal Mines 2002-2006
    Identifying Opportunities for Methane Recovery at U.S. Coal Mines: Profiles of Selected Gassy Underground Coal Mines 2002-2006 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency September 2008 (Revised January 2009) EPA 430-K-04-003 Identifying Opportunities for Methane Recovery at U.S. Coal Mines: Profiles of Selected Gassy Underground Coal Mines 2002-2006 EPA 430-K-04-003 September 2008 (Revised January 2009)* U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY * In the previously released version of this report, there was an error on page 1-7 involving two bulleted items dated July 2007. These bullets refer to roof fall events at CONSOL Energy’s Bailey (PA) and Buchanan (VA) mines. Both bullets actually refer to the same roof fall event, which occurred at Buchanan mine. Bailey mine was not shut down as previously stated; it produced 10.2 million tons of coal in 2006 and 9.9 million tons in 2007. USEPA regrets the error. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The U.S. EPA would like to thank the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration for the ventilation emissions data used in this document. Other industry experts, as well as various individuals at state and federal agencies, were also helpful during the preparation of this document. i Table of Contents Page # Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]