DOCSLIB.ORG

Study Guide Creation.Com/Tga Session 1 Study Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study Guide Creation.Com/Tga Session 1 Study Guide STUDY GUIDE CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 1 STUDY GUIDE SESSION 1 Why does Genesis matter? with Scott Gillis 1. 1 Peter 3:15 commands believers to always be prepared with a defense of their faith. This preparation is important because: a. Believers are better equipped to answer unbeliever’s questions and challenges b. c. They can help build the faith of other believers Believers are more confident to share the Gospel d. All of the above 2. The Bible is made up of how many books? 3. There are over ____________ cross references between the books of the Bible. 4. 5. True or False: When God created the world, there was no sorrow, death or pain. a. According to the Bible, why does everyone die in the world? b. Every descendant of Adam inherited that sin nature Adam disobeyed God’s command c. The penalty of sin is death d. All of the above 6. 7. How many times does the New Testament reference the book of Genesis? _____________________ 8. The New Testament authors saw Genesis as the ______________________ of the Gospel. ______________________. John’s Gospel opens with the phrase __________________________, clearly linking the Gospel to 9. beginning. John 1:3, 10 and Colossians 1:16 clearly demonstrate that ______________ was the Creator in the Jesus’ genealogy in Luke 3 goes all the way back through his ancestors to what person? a. King David 10. b. Abraham c. Adam d. Noah 2 CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 1 STUDY GUIDE 11. a. A descendant of non-human hominids The New Testament clearly sees Adam, “The First Man”, as: b. c. An allegory for the one human that God chose to represent early man d. None of the above The first man, created by God, from the dust of the ground 12. True or False: Jesus and the New Testament writers took the origins account recorded in 13. Genesis as literal, real historical events. are implying only a ‘spiritual death’ not physical death. True or False: When the New Testament authors refer to the penalty of sin being death, they 14. The Apostle Paul’s approach to the Gentiles in Acts 17, compared to Peter’s approach to the a. Jews in Acts 2, teaches us: b. Our culture today more closely reflects the ‘Greeks’ rather than the Jews. c. TheWe must Jews firstbetter build understood the foundation the foundational of the creation concept account and causein Genesis of ‘sin’ to effectively explain the Gospel d. All of the above 15. True or False: The documentary Fallout! demonstrated that most youth that regularly attended supports the historical account of biblical creation. church in the past but who no longer do so, had not been exposed to scientific evidence that 16. a. Testing Operational (experimental) science uses the “scientific method” and includes: b. Recording data c. Repetition d. All of the above 17. True or False: Historical science is sometimes referred to as Forensic science. 18. Which worldview has the most facts? a. Evolution b. Biblical creation c. Neither 19. a. In science, a “presupposition” is: b. An assumption used when observing the facts A tactic used in scientific debate c. d. All of the above The best way to initiate a scientific experiment 3 CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 1 STUDY GUIDE 1 Peter 3:15 also warns us to share a defense of our faith with an attitude of: a. Love 20. b. Respect c. d. b and c Gentleness FURTHER CONSIDERATION What was the most surprising thing you learned from this session? Why is this important? ANSWERS ..................................................................................... 1. d 12. True 2. 66 13. False 3. 14. d 4. True 15. True 5. d2800 16. d 6. 17. True 7. foundation/basis 18. c (both have the same facts; two different 8. over 100 times interpretations) 9. Jesus (the second person of the Trinity) 19. b c“In the beginning”, Genesis 1:1 d (although respect and gentleness are 11. c components of an attitude of love) 10. 20. 4 CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 2 STUDY GUIDE SESSION 2 Introduction to Genesis: Author, date, structure, genre with Dr Jonathan Sarfati 1. _______________________________ List some of the false views refuted by Genesis 1:1 _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ 2. The first premise of the Kalām argument is: “Everything which has a ____________________ has a 3. True_________________.” or False: Atheistic philosopher David Hume asserted that something could begin without a cause. 4. The two main inventors of the Documentary Hypothesis are _____________ and _______________________. 5. According to the Documentary Hypothesis, what four letters are used to represent the claimed 6. authors of the Pentateuch (Genesis–Deuteronomy)? _____ _____ _____ _____ The name used for God in the Prophets but not in the Pentateuch was “The _____________ of 7. ________________.” Why is it important that the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Bible) compares Jordan to a. Egypt, and Hebron to Zoan in Egypt? slavery in Egypt b. ThatIt helps Egypt confirm was thethat reference Moses composed point of the the history Pentateuch recorded first toin Israelitesthe Pentateuch escaping from c. d. All of the above It helps confirm it was written before Jerusalem was an established city in Israel. 8. Whom did Jesus think was the author of the Pentateuch? a. David b. Ezra c. d. Paul Moses 9. True or False: When Genesis 10:19 states “... in the direction of Sodom ...” it is clear that Genesis was written before God destroyed Sodom. 5 CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 2 STUDY GUIDE The Flood account and the Peter Piper Picked tongue-twister are examples of what type of literary structure? ___________________________ 10. 11. a. What follows from Noah What does “Toledot of Noah” mean? b. What came before Noah c. The legend of Noah d. We have no way to know 12. 13. How many toledots are there in Genesis? _________________ 14. True or False: The first toledot of Genesis regards ‘What followed from Creation’. 15. True or False: Genesis 1–11 is a totally different type of literature from 12–50. a. Allegorical Luke’s genealogy of Jesus (Luke 3) treats the ancestors in Genesis 5 and 11 as: b. c. Historical people Mythical heroes d. We have no way to know 16. The main feature of Hebrew poetry in the Bible is called ______________________. 17. What sort of verb is most common in Hebrew historical narrative in the Bible? ___________________ 18. a. Poetry What type of literature is Genesis? b. Parable c. Allegory d. Historical narrative 19. a. Billions of years long According to the Sabbath commandment of Exodus 20:8–11, the days of Genesis 1 were: b. The same length as the days of our week c. Not historical d. Not consecutive True or False: Paul in 1 Timothy 2:13 treats Adam and Eve as real historical people. 20. 6 CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 2 STUDY GUIDE FURTHER CONSIDERATION What was the most surprising thing you learned from this session? Why is this important? ANSWERS ..................................................................................... 1. chiasmus or chiasm Unitarianism 11. a 10. 2. Atheism, Evolutionism, Polytheism, 12. 11 3. False 13. True beginning, cause 4. 14. False 5. 15. c Graf and Wellhausen 6. Jehovah 16. parallelism J, E, D, P Sabaoth) 17. Wayyiqtol (waw consecutive) Lord, Hosts (The Lord of Hosts = 7. d 18. d 8. c 19. b 9. True True 20. 7 CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 3 STUDY GUIDE SESSION 3 Day 1: The creation of the world with Gary Bates 1. a. The creation is eternal What can we learn from the first verse of Genesis? b. c. God preceded the creation that He made d. Satan was there at the beginning 2. There were billions of years before God created 3. TrueGod is or the False: _________________ The light created of time on and Day is 1 ________________ was the sun. of time. 4. a. The entire universe What does Genesis use as a framework for defining and measuring time? b. The earth’s perspective c. The edge of the universe d. 5. God’s perception of time 6. The ___________________ Hypothesis says that Genesis expresses truth poetically. a. They think the rock layers are a history of billions of years The Gap Theory inserts billions of years of deep time between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 because: b. c. The grammar of Genesis itself teaches it d. a and c The KJV translation of Genesis 1:28 has the word ‘replenish’ 7. 8. TheTrue Hebrew or False: word A sound bara principle means _______________ of interpretation and the is to word interpret asah means Scripture _______________. by Scripture. 9. before the Fall. True or False: All long-age interpretations of Genesis 1 deliberately or inadvertently put death a. As historical narrative 10. How did the New Testament authors interpret Genesis? b. c. As poetry As an exhaustive account of how God created d. As a polemic against idolatry 8 CREATION.COM/TGA SESSION 3 STUDY GUIDE 11. True or False: The new heavens and earth will literally be a restoration of the original ‘very good’ creation. 12. 13. Some challenge that _______________ could not have survived before the sun was created. a. Are obviously not meant to be taken literally The ages given in the Genesis genealogies b. c. Come from Mesopotamian legends d. Are eschatological in nature Can be added up to provide a timeline of history 14. 15. The genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 are known as _____________________________. years. True or False: There are many gaps in the Genesis genealogies that could allow for millions of 16. a.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Baraminological Analysis of the Land Fowl (Class Aves, Order Galliformes)
    Galliform Baraminology 1 Running Head: GALLIFORM BARAMINOLOGY A Baraminological Analysis of the Land Fowl (Class Aves, Order Galliformes) Michelle McConnachie A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2007 Galliform Baraminology 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Timothy R. Brophy, Ph.D. Chairman of Thesis ______________________________ Marcus R. Ross, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Harvey D. Hartman, Th.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Judy R. Sandlin, Ph.D. Assistant Honors Program Director ______________________________ Date Galliform Baraminology 3 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, without Whom I would not have had the opportunity of being at this institution or producing this thesis. I would also like to thank my entire committee including Dr. Timothy Brophy, Dr. Marcus Ross, Dr. Harvey Hartman, and Dr. Judy Sandlin. I would especially like to thank Dr. Brophy who patiently guided me through the entire research and writing process and put in many hours working with me on this thesis. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their interest in this project and Robby Mullis for his constant encouragement. Galliform Baraminology 4 Abstract This study investigates the number of galliform bird holobaramins. Criteria used to determine the members of any given holobaramin included a biblical word analysis, statistical baraminology, and hybridization. The biblical search yielded limited biosystematic information; however, since it is a necessary and useful part of baraminology research it is both included and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation, Evolution, and the Historical Evidence
    Creation,Evolution, and the Historical Evidence DUANE T. GISH classifiedand more or less colligated by being broughtunder general laws, and which includes trustworthymethods for the discoveryof new truth withinits own domain"(emphasis added). Thus,for a theoryto qualifyas a scientifictheory, it mustbe supportedby eventsor processesthat can be observedto occur,and the theorymust be useful * Althoughthe views presentedin this article are not acceptable to the majorityof life scientists,the in predictingthe outcome of future natural phenom- ena or laboratoryexperiments. An additionallimita- editorial stafffeels that our membershipshould be Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/35/3/132/30638/4444262.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 aware of the creationistposition as described by tion usually imposedis that the theorymust be Duane T. Gish. capable of falsification;that is, one mustbe able to conceivesome experiment the failure of which would disprovethe theory. It is on thebasis ofsuch criteria F OR A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING of the issuesto be dis- thatmost evolutionists insist that creation be refused cussedin thispaper, I mustbegin by definingevolu- considerationas a possibleexplanation for origins. tionand creation.When the term evolution is used it Creationhas not been witnessedby humanobserv- will referto the generaltheory of organicevolution, ers,it cannotbe testedscientifically, and as a theory or themolecules-to-man theory of evolution. Accord- it is nonfalsifiable. ing to this theoryall livingthings have arisen by The generaltheory of evolution (molecules-to-man naturalistic,mechanistic, evolutionary processes from theory)also failsto meetall threeof thesecriteria, a single living source,which itselfhad arisen by however.Dobzhansky (1958), while seeking to affirm similarprocesses from inanimate matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Original Sin: Accounting for Evil in the World by Dr
    Evolution and Original Sin: Accounting for Evil in the World by Dr. Daryl P. Domning and Dr. Joseph F. Wimmer The Washington Theological Consortium (WTC) produced this discussion guide as part of a series titled "At the Crossroads of Science and Theology." The series aims to connect the interests and expertise of faculty in Washington-area theological schools with the questions and concerns of people in congregations regarding the relationship between science and religion. We hope to bring theological reflection and scientific research to adult education groups, in an interdisciplinary and ecumenical exploration of fundamental issues in this relationship. You may contact WTC at (202) 832-2675 for further information about this series, or visit the organizaton's Web site at http://washtheocon.org . The$Washington$Theological$Consortium$is$a$community$of$Theological$Schools$of$diverse$Christian$ traditions—with$partners$in$education,$spirituality$and$interfaith$dialogue—that$supports$ ecumenical$unity$and$interfaith$understanding$in$four$ways:$ $ • By$supporting$ecumenical$study$and$dialogue$that$explores$the$distinct$theological$traditions$of$ the$churches,$analyzes$barriers$to$Christian$unity,$and$explores$opportunities$for$shared$public$ witness.$$ $ • By$providing$an$ecumenical$context$for$equipping$clergy$and$laity$to$serve$the$mission$and$ ministry$of$the$Church$in$the$world$through$diverse$communities$and$in$ways$that$witness$to$ the$unity$that$is$ours$in$Christ.$$ $ • By$providing$member$institutions$the$means$of$sharing$their$rich$theological,$spiritual,$and$ practical$resources$by$developing$programs$and$services$that$are$best$done$in$collaboration,$ and$which$enrich$the$mission$and$programs$of$each$member.$$ $ • By$engaging$in$interreligious$study$and$dialogue,$with$members$of$other$faiths,$$that$explore$the$ differences$and$shared$values$of$the$theologies$and$practices$of$the$great$world$religions.$$$ $ $ About the Authors Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Destroys the Evolutionary Paradigm
    SCIENCE DESTROYS THE EVOLUTIONARY PARADIGM An Inservice Manual for Young-Earth Creationists Free Images – Snappygoat.com Materialistic Naturalism, an Immoral and Incoherent Philosophy!!! Dr. Jim Pagels – 4/18/2018 1 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts. For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven and do not return there but water the earth, making it bring forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater, so shall my word be that goes out from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it. Isaiah 55:9-11 This book along with its predecessors including Apologetic Resources, Lesson Plans for Biblical Apologetics and Touching Lives through Apologetics, a Counseling Perspective are offered free for personal and professional use in ministry, being available as downloads on the Michigan District website under schools-curriculum. Scriptural references are typically taken from the English Standard Version (ESV) although the King James Version (KJV) is also periodically utilized. 2 Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………..…….5 Preface…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Intended Audience ……………………………………………………………………………....8 Inservice Perspective……….…………………………………………………………….……..9 Inservice Questionnaire……………………………………………………………..…………10 1. Evolution, an Attack on the Supernatural Nature of God…………………………………..21 2. In Search of Truth…………………………………………………………………………..23 3. Creation Apologetics, Simple for Some, Incomprehensible to Others………..……..…….35 4. Two Typical Approaches to Young Earth Creationism……………………………………38 5. The Absolute Veracity of the Supernatural…………………….…………………………..40 6. A Tactical Approach to Creationism………………………….………………………..…..43 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Theism Everything Can Be Agnosticism Explained on the Basis of Natural Law
    O3 SB Three • Spring Board to Life • Chapter Three • By Pastor Dan Domke Six Day Creation Number of Days of Creation. –Six Day Creation not millions of years. –With in six days, everything was created. –Plants – for food –All the animals, fish, birds, cattle etc. –And finally Man Genesis is scientific, just in a different way than modern day science. • Lineus – classification Key – By structure • e.g. radial summitry, bi-lateral summitry • Biblical classification Key – By habitat • Sky –Water- Land • Not unscientific just a different methodology Baraminology- Bara=created / Min = Kind •Study of created kind. Science - Knowledge • Descriptive Science - Based on Fact • Prescriptive • Based on Assumptions Secular World View –Evolutionary Materialism –Uniformitarianism –Man a chance and random product of evolution, has no more intrinsic value than other animals. In practice – man –Man is lefthas to fendless for value Himself. than – No God or if there is He/She is impersonal.the animals. Biblical World View 1. Creationism 2. Catastrophism 3. Man is the result of special creation, created by God to be in fellowship with Him. And to care for the planet. 4. Man is above the animals and has infinite value. 5. God provides everything for man’s life, and knowledge, (science) etc. 6. God is the living God, and He is personal. Two World Views Compared REALITY Naturalism The material universe is all that exists. Reality is "one-dimensional." There is no such thing as a soul or a spirit. Atheism Everything can be Agnosticism explained on the basis of natural law. Existentialism Two World Views Compared Naturalism MAN Man is the chance product of a biological process of evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Flood of Noah
    THE GLOBAL FLOOD OF NOAH by Bert Thompson, Ph.D. DEDICATION This book is dedicated with deep appreciation to Joe and Beryl Nisbet, two “wee Scots” who, as husband and wife, have devoted their entire adult lives to teaching the Gospel in their native Scot- land and who, through their many personal sacrifices and exemplary conduct on behalf of the Lord and His church, have become such an endearing example for everyone around them. APOLOGETICS PRESS, INC. 230 Landmark Drive Montgomery, Alabama 36117-2752 © Copyright 1986 Revised Editions © Copyright 1999, 2005 ISBN: 0-932859-78-X All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in articles or critical reviews. -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................1 Mankind’s Response to the Genesis Flood .....................................1 CHAPTER 2 THE FLOOD IN SCRIPTURE AND HISTORY....................5 The Importance of the Doctrine of the Global Flood ......................5 The Reason for the Flood................................................................6 Supernatural Elements of the Flood ................................................8 The Ubiquity of Flood Stories.........................................................9 CHAPTER 3 THE GLOBAL FLOOD OF NOAH.......................................11 The Antediluvian World ...............................................................11 The Necessity of Constructing
    [Show full text]
  • Creation /Evolution
    Creation /Evolution • •^'•vs A Creationist Walk Through the Grand Canyon : Issue XX : : :: CONTENTS ; . Spring 1987 ARTICLES :;/ •:: ::- •; '•• •;. ':'••. •';•• ••• •' •••••••• •• .'• •. I A. Creationist Walk Through the Grand Canyon by Thomas Mclver 13 Fossil Insects: Pests of Creatioh by Gene Kritsky 19 Design; Created Kinds, and Engineering by FrancisJ, Arduini 25 Tbe Origin of Species by Punctuated Equilibria byi Frank J, Sonleitner : •REVIEWS.. :. .•-.-;;.: • ;• •;. ; • . .. ; . ; ; . ' ; 31 Reviews . ; . ' .'. ;. .• ' ;' ' V • v .". ... : . 39 Letters to the Edit or :• • • .. LICENSED TO UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED About this issue ... For years, the Institute for Creation Research has made much of its fre- quent student expeditions to the Grand Canyon. Since we have so often published investigations of other creationist "field research." we began to feel that it was about time we reported on one of these. Torn Mclver, a cultural anthropologist who had gained the confidence of the ICR. felt the same way and. In June 1985, went down into the Grand Canyon with a creationist study group. His recently completed and quite detailed report on the actual nature of that expedition, this issue's lead article, is an eye-opener. If you had thought that creationist "field research" on Mount Ararat and along the Paluxy River was short on scientific merit and objectivity, you will be amazed at how much less there is of it in these regular ICR treks. According to Henry Morris's cover letter accom- panying the April .1987 Acts & Facts, creationist students will once again enjoy "the inspiration and excitement of the ICR Grand Canyon Tour, climaxed by a glorious Easter morning service on the Canyon rim." From Tom Mclver's article, you will see how Morris's statement sums up the actual purpose of these trips so nicely.
    [Show full text]
  • ANOPA: 'Statistical' Systematics for Young-Earth Creationists
    ARTICLE ANOPA: ‘Statistical’ Systematics for Young-Earth Creationists Dan Bolnick, University of Texas, Austin reationists has been working hard to make been active members in the Baraminology Study Ctheir views appear as legitimate science. Part Group, whose website proclaims its “ultimate goal is of this strategy has been to get papers pub- to develop origin models that accommodate empiri- lished in peer-reviewed scientific journals. cal data in a biblical framework of earth history Creationists have used two strategies to achieve this through scientifically sound analysis of biological data goal. First, the recent review paper on “intelligent and scholarly analysis of biblical texts” design” (Meyer 2004) in the Proceedings of the (<http://www.bryancore.org/bsg/aboutmain.html>). Biological Society of Washington was published by To this end, Cavanaugh has been developing a bypassing the normal peer review process.According quantitative method for identifying whether a collec- to a recent statement from the Council that publishes tion of species represent a single “created kind”or are the journal, the editor Richard Sternberg handled the sufficiently distinct as to qualify as members of differ- paper in a manner “contrary to typical editorial prac- ent holobaramins. This method,called ‘Analysis of tices”(<http://www.biolsocwash.org/>). Pattern’(ANOPA) is touted as a method to “reduce the The second approach is to sanitize the content of dimensionality of multi-dimensional data with mini- the paper. Two other papers written by creationists mal loss of information and no assumptions about the have been published in peer reviewed journals in data’s distribution”(Wood and Cavanaugh 2003: 2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning Linda Ebert Student Handout 1
    A Bible Overview, Session 1: The Beginning Student Handout Genesis 1:1: Attributes of God 1. God is eternal • By creating a beginning, God started time 2. God is the Creator • God created “ex nihilo”= out of nothing 3. God is separate/distinct from His creation Day 1: • Time • The “heavens” = space Building blocks of the universe: • matter • light The light-dark cycle establishes a system of measuring time Day 2: space between the waters= sky Day 3: God separated the waters and dry land appeared and vegetation Day 4: “God made two great lights”: sun and moon and also stars Day 5: fish and birds • KIND: if two things can breed together they are of the same created kind. Day 6: • animals • humans: “Let us make humans beings in our image to be like us.” Genesis 1:26 o “Elohim”= plural noun with singular meaning o “Trinity” concept introduced: ABOV- 2020 Spring Session 1: The Beginning 1 Linda Ebert Student Handout www.abibleoverview.org o One God, three distinct Persons, all involved in creation: § Genesis 1:2 § John 1:1-4 o humans, male and female, made “in the image of God” (Genesis 1:27) o charge to humans Genesis 2 God formed Adam from the dust of the ground & breathed life into him God placed Adam in the Garden of Eden • “tree of life” • “tree of the knowledge of good and evil” o Warning: may eat of every tree “except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” because “If you eat its fruit, you are sure to die.” • God made Eve from Adam’s rib o “male” and “female”, “man” and “wife”, “united into one” o Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 2:24 quoted by Jesus in Matthew 19:4,5 ABOV- 2020 Spring Session 1: The Beginning 2 Linda Ebert Student Handout www.abibleoverview.org Creation: God says vs the world says: God says: • He existed before creation • He created time (a beginning), measured in days • He spoke creation into existence • His Creation is ordered and He sustains it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning Linda Ebert Script Facilitator
    ABOV- Session 1: The Beginning Script Facilitator Slide: Summary Introduction • Bible is unique in: o how it’s written o it’s circulation o it’s survival o its predictive prophecy- 1000 of them with 700 already fulfilled o its content • Organizational structure: Historical Highway handout • 12 themes will be used, which connect dots throughout history of Bible • YouVersion.com Start video- Session 1: The Beginning (Video clip SR-01A 00:00.0) Welcome to A Bible OverView session one and the book of Genesis which means "beginning." It starts out telling us the creation of the universe, the earth, and life on the earth in an easy to follow chronological manner. Although there were no witnesses to creation and we cannot recreate it in a laboratory, the Bible's account reveals the creation process using days with God as the Creator. Let’s read about these days starting with chapter one. * Day 1. Genesis 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. In the first ten words of Genesis 1:1 we learn about several attributes of God. First, we learn God is eternal, when it says, “In the beginning God…” This means God has no beginning. He has always been. He was not created and is outside of time. By creating a beginning, God started time. We think of time as a line. We “remember” the past, “live” in the present, and “expect” the future. But there was no time before creation. End video SR-01A (1:28:36) Slide: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Genesis 1:1 • How would you answer someone who asked “Who created God?” o No one did.
    [Show full text]
  • The CRS Ekinds Research Initiative: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Headed from Here
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 8 Print Reference: Pages 185-190 Article 25 2018 The CRS eKINDS research initiative: Where we have been and where we are headed from here Jean K. Lightner Liberty University Kevin Anderson Creation Research Society Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings Part of the Biology Commons DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Lightner, J.K., and K. Anderson. 2018. The CRS eKINDS research initiative: Where we have been and where we are headed from here. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 185–190. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Lightner, J.K., and K. Anderson. 2018. The CRS eKINDS research initiative: Where we have been and where we are headed from here. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 185–190. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. THE CRS eKINDS RESEARCH INIATIVE: WHERE WE HAVE BEEN AND WHERE WE ARE HEADED FROM HERE Jean K.
    [Show full text]
  • How Postcreationism's Claim of Hyperrapid Speciation Opposes Yet
    Duf et al. Evo Edu Outreach (2020) 13:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00124-w Evolution: Education and Outreach REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Dissent with modifcation: how postcreationism’s claim of hyperrapid speciation opposes yet embraces evolutionary theory R. Joel Duf1* , Thomas R. Beatman2 and David S. MacMillan III3 Abstract The development of creationism to its multiple modern forms has been made possible in part by its appropriation and misuse of mainstream scientifc terms. Here we illustrate how anti-evolutionary advocates have redefned the terms macroevolution and microevolution to advance their view of the origins of biological diversity. We identify and describe an ideological movement within modern young-earth creationism we call postcreationism, those that have embraced a hyperrapid speciation model of the origin of biological diversity. Postcreationism is demonstrated with specifc examples from young-earth creationist publications and Ark Encounter creationist theme park, with takea- ways for addressing these ideas in evolutionary biology education. Keywords: Young-earth creationism, Creationist, Macroevolution, Microevolution, Evolution, Natural selection, Postcreationism, Ark Encounter Introduction of living things, including humans, on earth were inde- Young-earth creationism, also known variously as literal- pendently created at about the same time as the earth. day creationism, literal creationism, or creation science, In their description of natural history, the supernatural is a movement dedicated to providing
    [Show full text]