John Hunter and His Painters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John Hunter and His Painters John Hunter and his painters Selwyn Taylor DM MCh FRCS Honorary Curator of Portraits The Royal College of Surgeons of England When contemplating the rich collection of portraits on Apothecaries and as a result it hangs now in the very the walls of this College, some ofwhich surround you as I beautiful Court Room of the Worshipful Society of speak, it is not difficult to appreciate what a splendid Apothecaries in Blackfriars Lane. The College owns a source of history they represent. Among them the copy by Henry M Allen which was given by Evelyn College is proud to be custodian of a unique group of Sprawson (Fig. 2). It is, I have no doubt, an excellent paintings which portray John Hunter, the father of likeness, showing Hunter a little untidy in appearance, surgical science, whose bicentenary we currently cele- thoughtful, but kindly. It is certainly my favourite brate. But for me, the most remarkable fact is that no one portrait of the great man and, like many of the rough has discussed this particular group in any detail since Sir drafts which the College has been fortunate to acquire Arthur Keith delivered a 'Discourse on the Portraits and over the years from the artists who have been commis- Personality of John Hunter' in February 1928 (1). Keith sioned to paint portraits, it conveys more of the sitter's was Conservator of the Hunterian Collection and a character than most. distinguished anatomist and anthropologist, but custod- I must say, however, that I do sympathise with Anne ians have problems and Keith's opening comment was: Hunter because with that straggling and wispy red hair 'In spite of every care Reynolds' portrait of Hunter is not fringing his face, John Hunter does not impress me as a lasting well'. Sadly this is still true, but let me pay tribute giant of his profession; in addition, Anne did not like his to the devoted skill and attention which Mr Scott untidy beard which had not been present when he was Moncrieff has given to it in recent years. courting her nor is it in the great Reynolds portrait. The The baseline for any discussion about the portraiture story is told,- although I can find no authority for it, that of John Hunter must be the fine picture by Sir Joshua Reynolds persuaded Hunter that since he had such an Reynolds which for so long has hung behind the interesting bone, structure underlying his face, it would President's chair in the Council Room of the College be difficult for him as a painter to do it justice without a (Fig. 1). cast being taken to assist him in the task. It was then only We know from the painter's notebooks and Hunter's a small step to persuade the sitter that it would be much own comments in his diaries that Reynolds found his more comfortable for him if he shaved off his whiskers subject a bad sitter and although the two were friends, before the wet clay became incorporated in them, and this may well have been one of the factors which this he agreed. We have here in the College the resulting mitigated against the success of the venture when the life cast of Hunter's face which tells us much, and is artist first embarked upon it. Certainly Hunter's wife especially valuable when other portraits are claimed to be Anne, did not approve of the first draft which Reynolds ofJohn Hunter (Fig. 3). Even in the photograph you can submitted and in due course she gave it away to James readily detect the tell-tale wart on the right side of his Weatherall, an upholsterer in the Haymarket. Weatherall nose, the slight deviation of the nose to the left and the was the man who managed the Hunter's property on the pattern of the lips and mouth. east side of Leicester Square in which they lived and At this point my sympathy passes from Anne Hunter entertained. At a much later date, Anne explained to to Sir Joshua Reynolds, for he had started the final Weatherall, who continued to manage the property for portrait in 1786 with four sittings and later in his diary some years after John died, that it was Reynolds' sketch records that he gave two more sittings in 1788 and yet of her husband. Fortunately, unlike Lady Churchill who another in 1789 for 'retouching' of the canvas. It is disposed of Graham Sutherland's portrait of her hus- reasonable to assume that the absence of any sittings in band, when Anne gave the portrait to Weatherall, she did 1787 were due to mutual dissatisfaction with the way the not order him to destroy it. Years later Weatherall gave it project was progressing. This is not so surprising for by to his nephew, Thomas Knight, who qualified as a doctor now Hunter was a sick man with extensive arterioscler- at Apothecaries' Hall and later joined the Livery. osis and recurrent attacks of angina. He was often in pain Fortunately, in 1857, Thomas Knight presented it to the and this began to show in his face. At this juncture let me 2 S Taylor Figure 1. Oil on canvas by Sir Joshua Reynolds PRA, 1786. Figure 3. Life mask in plaster, c. 1785. picture was far advanced, Hunter fell into a train of thought, in the attitude in which he is represented in the present portrait. Reynolds without saying a word, turned the canvas upside down, made a fresh sketch, with the head between the legs of the former figure, and so proceeded to lay on over the former painting the colours of that which now graces the walls of the library at the College of Surgeons. This story has been repeated countless times and, as is so often the case, even in scientific papers, the original statement is usually found to be embroidered. Thus a leader in the Lancet in 1937 quotes how Leslie, Groves and Cronin all described 'a thick cake of paint between the legs where the head had been' (3). Indeed the saga of restoration of this canvas by Reynolds would fill a book. The fading of many of this great artist's paintings has been attributed to the pig- ments and media which he used and experimented with, but unfortunately they all too often result in areas ofwhat Figure 2. Oil on canvas by Henry M Allen, a copy of the looks like bitumen, cracked and featureless. Time has original by Reynolds now in the Society of Apothecaries, 1785. shown these materials to be unstable but, fortunately for us, in 1816, less than 30 years after Reynolds painted quote to you an old legend written by Drewry Ottley Hunter's portrait, John Jackson was commissioned by which was published in what was the first full-length life Sir Charles Bell to paint a copy which now hangs in the of Hunter (2). National Portrait Gallery. This copy shows how the Reynolds found Hunter a bad sitter and had not been able to original must have looked, with a fine purple velvet coat satisfy himself with the likeness, when one day, after the clothing a rather pale Hunter, but much of the original's John Hunter and his painters 3 details, the lettering on the spines of the books and so on, is sadly skimped. In 1817, when Reynolds' portrait was given to the College the Conservator of the National Gallery advised that 'nothing should be done'. A further copy painted in 1854 by Muller showed by comparison much fading. In 1863 Leslie wrote: 'In the careless custody of the College of Surgeons the picture appears irretrievably ruined', but then a Mr Farrer was called in and after his attention the portrait was said to look 'as fresh from the painter's easel'. One dreads to think what he must have done. Fading continued until, in 1937, Sir Alfred Webb-Johnson invited Mr W A Holder to restore Reynolds' portrait. After a great deal of painstaking work the picture appeared much as you see it today and Holder was able to report that the deterioration of the pigment had substantially come to an end and only regular cleaning should be necessary in the future. A few years ago, after taking advice, I removed the glass and I think that the picture has enjoyed the opportunity of breathing naturally. Thus it came about that in 1958 Sir Reginald Watson-Jones decided to try and settle the matter of the upside down canvas once and for all and subjected the painting to examination by X-rays. Sir Reginald de- scribed how the National Gallery: skilfully carried out the task which shows that the story told by Figure 4. Engraving by William Sharp published 1 January Drewry Ottley forty years after Hunter's death was not true, 1788. but it does reveal something much more interesting-the amazing change which Hunter's face has undergone in the intervening two or three years between Reynolds' start on the diary, a sheet of paper with notes in the handwriting of portrait and its completion. From a youthful, almost plump Sir Anthony Carlisle who, as President of the Court of middle aged individual he has shrunk to a much older man and Examiners in July 1831, had been sitting all day in the the strained appearance we now see is surely the result of the Council Room examining candidates for the Membership advanced arterial disease which was by then causing repeated of the College. His gaze had been caught, as he sat there, attacked of angina and was to lead to his death in 1793 when he by Hunter's portrait on the wall for he had been a pupil was only sixty five years old (4).
Recommended publications
  • Haydn: the Libretto of "The Creation", New Sources and a Possible Librettist
    SCHOLARSHIP HAYDN: THE LIBRETTO OF "THE CREATION", NEW SOURCES AND A POSSIBLE LIBRETTIST 1. INTRODUCTION The success of Haydn’s “Creation” has always depended to a large extent upon the language in which it was being performed, and what the audience thought of the quality of the text. Within a few years of its first performances in both Vienna and London this was being attacked as far inferior to the quality of the music that Haydn had provided for it. Both the original German and English versions suffered this early criticism: It is little wonder that the words translated from the German almost literally into English, should be neither sense nor grammar, nor that they should make wicked work with Milton.i [Anna Seward 1802] Would he [Haydn] had been directed by you about the words to The Creation! It is lamentable to see such divine music joined with such miserable broken English.ii [George Thomson 1804] First, a few words about the text, if it is not already lost effort to write anything at all about that concoction [Machwerk]. If one had wanted to set a trap for a composer and reveal him in all his nakedness, I cannot imagine anything more successful. iii [F.L.A. Kunzen 1801] The Creation is a remarkable work in that it is the first oratorio to have been composed and published in a bilingual format. The libretto that Haydn took back with him to Vienna was in English. He subsequently obtained a German translation from his friend and colleague Baron van Swieten; and when the work was eventually published, it contained both sets of text.
    [Show full text]
  • 293 BIBLIOGRAPHY Abrams, M. H. the Mirror and the Lamp. New
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp. New York: W. W. Norton, 1953. Adams, Joseph. Memoirs of the Life and Doctrines of the Late John Hunter, Esq. 2 ed. London: Callow and Hunter, 1818. Alexander, David. “Kauffman and the Print Market in Eighteenth-Century England.” In Angelica Kauffman: A Continental Artist in Georgian England, edited by Wendy Wassyng Roworth. London: Reaktion Books, 1992. Ariès, Philippe. The Hour of Our Death. Translated by Helen Weaver. 1st American ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1981. Armstrong, Isobel. Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics, and Politics. London and New York: Routledge, 1993. Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987. Badura-Skoda, Eva. “Aspects of Performance Practice.” In Eighteenth-Century Keyboard Music, edited by Robert Marshall. New York: Schirmer, 1994. Balderston, Katharine, ed. Thraliana: The Diary of Mrs. Hester Lynch Thrale, Later Mrs. Piozzi. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1942. Barker, Hannah, and Elaine Chalus, eds. Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: Roles, Representations and Responsibilities. London: Longman, 1997. Beci, Veronika. Musikalische Salons: Blütezeit einer Frauenkultur. Düsseldorf: Artemis and Winkler, 2000. Bender, John, and David Wellbery, eds. Chronotypes: The Construction of Time. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991. Bermingham, Ann. Learning to Draw: Studies in the Cultural History of a Polite and Useful Art. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000. 293 294 Bettany, G. T. “Hunter, John.” In The Dictionary of National Biography, 287-93. London: Oxford University Press, 1917. Bindman, David. Hogarth and His Times: Serious Comedy. London: British Museum Press, 1997. Blake, William.
    [Show full text]
  • 35 Chapter II. Public and Private
    Chapter II. Public and Private “Moral Sentiment” and “Physical Truth”: the Upstairs and Downstairs of Anne and John Hunter What, besides a couple of inches of newsprint, might have connected the worlds of Anne and John Hunter? Anne Hunter’s poems, set by Haydn as canzonets, and John Hunter’s work and reputation do not immediately suggest themselves to be kindred. Admittedly, Hunterian biographies, which are considerably unified in their treatment of the couple, strongly tend to suggest that neither spouse was influential in the pursuits of the other. The British Critic set the tone in 1802: “Such a union of science and genius has seldom been contemplated by the world, as in the persons of John Hunter and his lady,” wrote an anonymous reviewer. “The former, investigating physical truth with a zeal and acuteness not often equaled; the latter, adorning moral sentiment with the finest graces of language.”1 Throughout the Hunterian biographical literature of the next two centuries, husband and wife are made to represent an ideal juxtaposition, playing opposite, though complementary, roles.2 John Hunter, who held the title Surgeon Extraordinary to George III, earned distinction for his significant contributions to medical knowledge, especially in the areas of gunshot wounds, venereal disease, and aneurysm. In order to investigate “physical truth” he assembled an extensive collection of 1 Robert Nares, “Art. 12. Poems. By Mrs. John Hunter,” The British Critic 20 (1802). 2 The earliest book-length biography, written by Jessé Foot just one year after Hunter’s death, provides the main exception. Foot’s dislike for the surgeon appears to have strongly influenced his retelling of his subject’s life; however, the document is nevertheless valuable as an antidote to the Hunterian mythologizing that gathered enormous momentum in subsequent decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Introduction
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aberystwyth Research Portal Anne Hunter and the Body-Snatchers: An Anatomy of Romantic Medicine, Politics and Elegy Stephanie Elizabeth Churms MA Dissertation 2010 Page 1 of 79 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2 Chapter One : Anne Hunter: Defending the Medical World ............................... 8 Chapter Two: Anne Hunter and Politico-Medical Cultures ............................... 26 Chapter Three: The Gravesite and the (Un)locatability of Death ..................... 43 Chapter Four: An Anatomy of Elegy ................................................................. 53 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 69 Appendix 1: Illustrations .................................................................................. 71 Primary Bibliography........................................................................................ 74 Secondary Bibliography ................................................................................... 77 Page 2 of 79 Introduction It is a gloomy night in the depths of a chilling winter. An oppressive despondency hangs in the air. The constant threat of political discord and news from across the channel of revolutionary violence permeates the minds of those absent from the midnight streets of London. The house in Earls Court looms beyond the
    [Show full text]
  • The Composer, the Surgeon, His Wife and Her Poems: Haydn and the Anatomy of the English Canzonetta
    Eighteenth-Century Music 6/1, 77–112 © 2009 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S1478570609001742 Printed in the United Kingdom the composer, the surgeon, his wife and her poems: haydn and the anatomy of the english canzonetta sarah day-o’connell ! ABSTRACT This article examines the household of John Hunter, a London surgeon, and Anne Hunter, a poet, and its relevance for Haydn’s collaboration with Anne – the two sets of English Canzonettas (1794–1795). I interpret canzonettas by Haydn and several of his London contemporaries as artefacts of a context in which music and anatomy were pursued not only under the same roof but by the same people, who participated in shared discourses, medical and musical, regarding the nature of femininity. This perspective reveals ways in which John partook of his wife’s world, asserting the artful and beautiful of dissection and anatomy, and suggests new significance for aspects of the Haydn–Hunter canzonettas, especially their references to body parts, sighs, symptoms and death. On 3 June 1794 London’s daily newspaper The Sun advertised on its first page the newly available English canzonettas by Joseph Haydn: DR. HAYDN Just published, SIX ORIGINAL CANZONETTAS, with an Accompaniment for the Piano Forte, price 7s 6d, to be had at the Author’s, No. 1, Bury-street, St. James’s, and at Messrs. Corri, Dussek, and Co. Music Sellers to Her Majesty, No. 67, Dean-street, Soho, and Bridge-street, Edinburgh. On the same page appeared a testimony asserting the efficacy of ‘Rymer’s Cardiac Tincture and Pills’, billed as a treatment for ‘flying gout’ in the stomach and bowels, ‘spasms, wind, and constipation’: TO THE PUBLIC.
    [Show full text]
  • Haydn's London Ladies: Thoughts on Creating and Performing a Program
    HAYDN: The Online Journal of the Haydn Society of North America Volume 7 Number 1 Spring 2017 Article 3 March 2017 Haydn's London Ladies: Thoughts on Creating and Performing a Program Clare McCaldin McCaldin Arts Follow this and additional works at: https://remix.berklee.edu/haydn-journal Recommended Citation McCaldin, Clare (2017) "Haydn's London Ladies: Thoughts on Creating and Performing a Program," HAYDN: The Online Journal of the Haydn Society of North America: Vol. 7 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://remix.berklee.edu/haydn-journal/vol7/iss1/3 This Interview is brought to you for free and open access by Research Media and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in HAYDN: The Online Journal of the Haydn Society of North America by an authorized editor of Research Media and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 McCaldin, Claire. “Haydn’s London Ladies: Thoughts on Creating and Performing a Program.” HAYDN: Online Journal of the Haydn Society of North America 7.1 (Spring 2017), http://haydnjournal.org. © RIT Press and Haydn Society of North America, 2017. Duplication without the express permission of the author, RIT Press, and/or the Haydn Society of North America is prohibited. Haydn’s London Ladies: Thoughts on Creating and Performing a Program by Clare McCaldin McCaldin Arts (See http://mccaldinarts.com) I. Introduction A few years ago I was chatting about Joseph Haydn with my father Denis McCaldin, founder and current Director of the Haydn Society of Great Britain. We were lamenting the composer’s lack of biological heirs (though not his musical ones), and the irony of his unhappy marriage to a non-lover of music despite his fondness for female company and his many music-loving and talented female fans, when an idea occurred to us: might there be a good story to be told about Haydn and his various lady friends? I am a freelance singer and I generate a lot of my own work creatively as well as at the business end.
    [Show full text]