ALA Opposes PATRIOT Act Compromise

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ALA Opposes PATRIOT Act Compromise ISSN 0028-9485 March 2006 Vol. LV No. 2 www.ala.org/nif On February 9, four Republican Senators (John Sununu–NH; Lisa Murkowski–AK; Chuck Hagel–NE; and Larry Craig–ID), who had joined in the threat to filibuster the House Conference Report on the Reauthorization of the USA PATRIOT Act, announced that they had negotiated a compromise deal with the White House. The deal enabled White House and the Republican Congressional leadership to garner enough votes to ensure passage of the reauthorization in the Senate. It was not certain where House Judiciary Committee chair James Sensenbrenner stood on the proposed changes. The American Library Association quickly announced its opposition to the proposed ALA opposes compromise, which lacked the necessary strengthening of the standards (by requiring PATRIOT Act individualized suspicion) for obtaining a Section 215 order, and did not provide the recipient of a Section 215 court order meaningful opportunity to challenge the order or compromise the attached gag order in a court of law. The compromise included these changes: ● “Ability to challenge the gag order attached to a Section 215 order.” The possibility only is available after one year and the FISA judge may only overturn the gag if the government does not certify and the judge finds that there is no reason to believe that the disclosure “may endanger the national security of the U.S., interfere with a crimi- nal, counterterrorism, or counterintelligence investigation, interfere with diplomatic relations, or endanger the life or physical safety of any person.” The certification of the government to these possibilities is to be taken as conclusive. ● Removal of the requirement that a recipient of an NSL inform the FBI of the identity of an attorney to whom disclosure was made or will be made to obtain legal advice or legal assistance with respect to the order. The proposal still requires the recipient to, upon the (continued on page 109) Published by the ALA Intellectual Freedom Committee, Kenton L. Oliver, Chair in this issue targets of the censor books ALA opposes PATRIOT Act compromise .......................57 Biology: Concepts and Connections ................................87 Born Too Short .................................................................71 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time ........71 violence in Mideast over Danish cartoon ........................59 The Earth, My Butt and Other Big Round Things ...........70 Geography Club ...............................................................73 IFC report to ALA Council ..............................................59 Girl, Interrupted ...............................................................73 Hershey ..........................................................................109 FTRF report to ALA Council ..........................................61 It Stops With Me ...............................................................95 The King Never Smiles [Thailand] ..................................78 library insists FBI provide warrant ..................................62 Lolita ................................................................................69 Three Wishes ....................................................................74 John Doe, employer win IF award ..................................62 To Kill a Mockingbird ......................................................74 When Jeff Comes Home ...................................................72 Google defies DOJ search demand ..................................63 periodicals U.S. assailed over rights of terror suspects .....................63 Columbus North Triangle [Columbus North H.S.] .........97 Jyllands-Posten [Denmark] .............................................59 UCLA alum pulls offer to buy Magazinet [Norway] ........................................................59 lecture tapes .....................................................................64 The Post [U. of Wisconsin, Milwaukee] .........................87 fair use threatened ............................................................64 fi lm spy court judge quits in protest ........................................65 Brokeback Mountain ........................................................76 “little red book,” big fat lie ..............................................65 broadcasting The Book of Daniel ................................................... 76, 77 Frank Wilkinson remembered ..........................................66 Will and Grace .................................................................77 censorship dateline: libraries, schools, colleges and universities, film, broadcasting, Views of contrubutors to the Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom are not necessarily those of the editors, the Intellectual Freedom foreign .......................................................................69 Committee, or the American Library Association. from the bench: U.S. Supreme Court, schools, (ISSN 0028-9485) colleges and universities ...........................................79 Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom is published bimonthly (Jan., Mar., May, July, Sept., Nov.) by the American Library Association, is it legal?: libraries, schools, student press, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. The newsletter is also avail- colleges and universities, political expres- able online at www.ala.org/nif. Subscriptions: $70 per year (print), sion and government eavesdropping, Inter- which includes annual index; $50 per year (electronic); and $85 per year (both print and electronic). For multiple subscriptions net, access to information, copyright, to the same address, and for back issues, please contact the trademark ..................................................................83 Office for Intellectual Freedom at 800-545-2433, ext. 4223 or [email protected]. Editorial mail should be addressed to the Office of success stories: libraries, schools, student Intellectual Freedom, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, Illinois 60611. Periodical postage paid at Chicago, IL at additional mailing press, colleges and universities, trademark, offices. POSTMASTER: send address changes to Newsletter on art ..............................................................................95 Intellectual Freedom, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. 58 Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom 55n2.indd 58 3/13/2006 4:21:08 PM violence in Mideast over offended many Muslims.” Despite the apology, the publi- cation’s offices in Copenhagen and in the northern town of controversial Danish cartoon Aarhus were evacuated after a bomb threat. Protestors angry over Danish cartoons of the Prophet “At approximately three minutes past five, an English- Muhammad clashed with Lebanese security forces February speaking person gave a message that there would be a bomb 4. An early morning march through downtown Beirut attack at the Jyllands-Posten offices ten minutes after,” exploded into violence when a breakaway crowd surged Flemming Munch, a Copenhagen police spokesman, told toward a high-rise building that housed the Austrian and reporters. Danish Missions, chanting obscene anti-Danish slogans in Magazinet, a Norwegian publication that reprinted some Arabic and vandalizing cars, office buildings and a Maronite of the cartoons, also said that it “regretted if the draw- Catholic church nearby. Other protestors burned Danish ings offended Muslims.” Norwegian Prime Minister Jens flags and flags bearing images of the cross. Stoltenberg told a Norwegian news agency, “we will not Lebanese security forces fired tear gas to disperse apologize because in a country like Norway, which guar- the crowd, but a group managed to make its way to the antees the freedom of expression, we cannot apologize for building, breaking windows and setting it on fire. The fire what the newspapers print. But I am sorry that this may quickly spread through the building, and people jumped out have hurt many Muslims.” of windows to escape the flames. Reuters reported that one In Copenhagen, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish person had died. A Dutch news photographer at the scene prime minister, sought a similar balance, saying: “I want to was beaten when several demonstrators mistook him for emphasize that in Denmark we attach fundamental impor- being Danish. tance to the freedom of expression, which is a vital and Demonstrators also attacked police officers with stones and set fire to several fire engines. Lebanese security forces (continued on page 109) regained control over the area within two hours, using water cannons and bullets fired over protestors’ heads. The day before, protestors set fire to the Danish and IFC report to ALA Council Swedish Missions in Damascus, Syria. In Gaza, Palestinians marched through the streets, storming European buildings The following is the text of the Intellectual Freedom and burning German and Danish flags. Protestors smashed Committee’s report to the ALA Council, delivered January the windows of the German cultural center and threw stones 25 by IFC Chair Kenton Oliver at the ALA Midwinter at the European Commission building, police said. Meeting in San Antonio, Texas. Iraqis rallying by the hundreds demanded an apology The ALA Intellectual Freedom Committee (IFC) is from the European Union, and the leader of the Palestinian pleased to present this update of its activities. Under group Hamas called the cartoons “an unforgivable insult” “Information,” this report covers the seventh edition of the that merited punishment by death. Pakistan summoned
Recommended publications
  • Department of Homeland Security Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2008
    S. HRG. 110–36 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Department of Homeland Security Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 33–920 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont TED STEVENS, Alaska TOM HARKIN, Iowa ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATTY MURRAY, Washington MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JACK REED, Rhode Island SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado BEN NELSON, Nebraska LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director BRUCE EVANS, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland TED STEVENS, Alaska HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania PATTY MURRAY, Washington PETE V.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Censorship and the First Amendment Robert A
    Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 25 Article 2 Issue 1 Symposium on Censorship & the Media 1-1-2012 Self-Censorship and the First Amendment Robert A. Sedler Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation Robert A. Sedler, Self-Censorship and the First Amendment, 25 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 13 (2012). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol25/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES SELF-CENSORSHIP AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT ROBERT A. SEDLER* I. INTRODUCTION Self-censorship refers to the decision by an individual or group to refrain from speaking and to the decision by a media organization to refrain from publishing information. Whenever an individual or group or the media engages in self-censorship, the values of the First Amendment are compromised, because the public is denied information or ideas.' It should not be sur- prising, therefore, that the principles, doctrines, and precedents of what I refer to as "the law of the First Amendment"' are designed to prevent self-censorship premised on fear of govern- mental sanctions against expression. This fear-induced self-cen- sorship will here be called "self-censorship bad." At the same time, the First Amendment also values and pro- tects a right to silence.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloggers and Netizens Behind Bars: Restrictions on Internet Freedom In
    VIETNAM COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS QUÊ ME: ACTION FOR DEMOCRACY IN VIETNAM Ủy ban Bảo vệ Quyền làm Người Việt Nam BLOGGERS AND NETIZENS BEHIND BARS Restrictions on Internet Freedom in Vietnam Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, January 2013 / n°603a - AFP PHOTO IAN TIMBERLAKE Cover Photo : A policeman, flanked by local militia members, tries to stop a foreign journalist from taking photos outside the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court during the trial of a blogger in August 2011 (AFP, Photo Ian Timberlake). 2 / Titre du rapport – FIDH Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5
    [Show full text]
  • The Stored Communications Act, Gag Orders, and the First Amendment
    10 BURKE (DO NOT DELETE) 12/13/2017 1:29 PM WHEN SILENCE IS NOT GOLDEN: THE STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT, GAG ORDERS, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT Alexandra Burke* I. INTRODUCTION Cloud computing has completely changed the landscape of information storage. Sensitive information that was once stored in file cabinets and eventually on computers is now stored remotely using web-based cloud computing services.1 The cloud’s prevalence in today’s world is undeniable, as recent studies show that nearly forty percent of all Americans2 and an estimated ninety percent of all businesses use the cloud in some capacity.3 Despite this fact, Congress has done little in recent years to protect users and providers of cloud computing services.4 What Congress has done dates back to its enactment of the Stored Communications Act (SCA) in 1986.5 Passed decades before the existence *J.D. Candidate, 2018, Baylor University School of Law; B.B.A. Accounting, 2015, Texas A&M University. I would like to extend my gratitude to each of the mentors, professors, and legal professionals who have influenced my understanding of and appreciation for the law. Specifically, I would like to thank Professor Brian Serr for his guidance in writing this article. Finally, I would like to acknowledge my family and friends, who have always shown me unwavering support. 1 See Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473, 2491 (2014) (defining cloud computing as “the capacity of Internet-connected devices to display data stored on remote servers rather than on the device itself”); see also Paul Ohm, The Fourth Amendment in a World Without Privacy, 81 MISS.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 4:15-Cv-00358-O Document 41 Filed 06/17/21 Page 1 of 28 Pageid 502
    Case 4:15-cv-00358-O Document 41 Filed 06/17/21 Page 1 of 28 PageID 502 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, CIVIL ACTION NO: 4:15-cv-358-O Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER A. NOVINGER, et al., Defendants. June 17, 2021 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REOPEN AND FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO F. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and subsect. (4) and (5) Margaret A. Little N.D. Tex. Bar No. 303494CT Kara M. Rollins, pro hac vice forthcoming New Civil Liberties Alliance 1225 19th St. NW, Suite 450 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202-869-5210 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Movants Christopher A. Novinger and ICAN Investment Group, LLC Case 4:15-cv-00358-O Document 41 Filed 06/17/21 Page 2 of 28 PageID 503 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. STANDARDS RELATING TO RULE 60(b)(4) MOTIONS ........................................................... 3 II. THE GAG ORDER VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA: in Or Out?
    Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General FEMA: In or Out? OIG-09-25 February 2009 OIG Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General Introduction “Since the end of World War II, Congress and Presidents have debated, formulated, and revised administrative responsibilities for emergency management.”1 Some of the important questions that have been the subject of debate over the past 60 years, and that are particularly relevant today in the “FEMA In or Out” debate, include: � What the jurisdictional boundaries of the agency charged with emergency management should be; � How responsibility for new or emerging threats should be assigned; � Whether it is necessary (or advisable) to distinguish between natural and manmade threats; � What is meant by “all-hazards,” and what elements need to be present in an agency with an all-hazards mission; � What the relationship between crisis management and consequence management should be; and � What the relationships among the federal, state and local governments should be during a disaster, and whether the relationships should change in the face of a catastrophe. On December 17, 2008, Congressman James L. Oberstar, Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, reopened the debate by submitting a memorandum to President-elect Barack H. Obama, recommending that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) “be re-instated as an independent, cabinet-level agency reporting directly to the President.”2 Two days later, Congressman Bennie G. Thompson, Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, recommended the opposite–that FEMA remain a part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), warning that “FEMA removal from DHS would likely result in the hamstringing of 1 Henry B.
    [Show full text]
  • In 2017, Broad Federal Search Warrants, As Well As
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | FALL 2017 Federal Search Warrants and Nondisclosure Orders Lead to Legal Action; DOJ Changes Gag Order Practices n 2017, broad federal search warrants, as well as from disclosing the fact that it had received such a request. nondisclosure orders preventing technology and social On Oct. 12, 2017, the Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of media companies from informing their customers that their Expression at Yale Law School and 20 First Amendment Scholars, information had been handed over to the government, led to including Silha Center Director and Silha Professor of Media legal action and raised concerns from observers. However, Ethics and Law Jane Kirtley, fi led an amici brief in response Ithe U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) also changed its rules on the to the ruling, explaining that National Security Letters (NSL) gag orders, leading a large technology company to drop its lawsuit issued by the FBI are accompanied by a nondisclosure order, against the agency regarding the orders. which “empowers the government to preemptively gag a wire or In 2017, the DOJ fi led two search warrants seeking extensive electronic communication service provider from speaking about information from web hosting company DreamHost and from the government’s request for information about a subscriber.” Facebook in connection to violent protests in Washington, The brief contended that these orders constitute prior restraints D.C. during President Donald Trump’s January 20 inauguration in violation of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Supreme Court festivities. On Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Portraits in Passing from Twenty-Two Countries
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 359 138 SO 023 189 AUTHOR Bjerstedt, Ake, Ed. TITLE Fifty Peace Educators: Self-Portraits in Passing from Twenty-Two Countries. Peace Education Reports No. 7. INSTITUTION Lund Univ. (Sweden). Malmo School of Education. REPORT NO ISSN-1101-6426 PUB DATE Apr 93 NOTE 82p. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Educational Research; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Global Approach; Higher Education; *International Education; Interviews; *Peace; *Personal Narratives; Teaching Experience IDENTIFIERS *Peace Education ABSTRACT The project group "Preparedness for Peace" of the Department of Education and Psychological Research, Malmo School of Education. Sweden, explores ways of helping children andyoung people deal constructively with questions of peace andwar. As part of its work, the project group collects viewpointson the role of schools in pursuit of "peace preparedness." In this regard, experts withspecial interests and competencies in areas related topeace education have been interviewed by the project. This document presents excerpts from interviews with 50 peace educators representing 22 different countries. Answers given by interviewees to the question "Asan introduction, could you say a few words about yourself andyour interest in the field of peace education?"are the focus of the report. (DB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best thatcan be made from the original document. ***********************************************************************
    [Show full text]
  • Blank Logs Template
    FOIA Requests Closed by OIP in September 2017 Request Number Office Submitted Date Date Closed Summary of Request Disposition of Request DOJ-2017-006081 DAG 08/15/2017 09/01/2017 Copy of the September 9, 2015 memorandum from former Deputy Attorney Full grant General Sally Yates pertaining to individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing. DOJ-2017-005839 AG 08/04/2017 09/01/2017 Records submitted pursuant to Executive Order 13800, Strengthening the All records referred to another Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure. agency DOJ-2017-005919 OIP 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning Freedom of Information Act requests and responses No records regarding Senator Joe Manchin submitted since November 2012. DOJ-2017-005681 AG 07/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-004908 AG 06/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-005914 AG 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records pertaining to meeting between President Bill Clinton and Attorney Partial grant/partial denial General Loretta Lynch that took place at the Phoenix airport in June 2016. DOJ-2014-000036 ASG 10/21/2013 09/06/2017 Records resulting from a search of the Departmental Executive Secretariat All records referred to another database involving the term "Guantanamo." agency DOJ-2015-000022 AG 10/22/2014 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Department of Justice Obscenity Prosecution Task Full grant Force in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Gagged, Sealed & Delivered
    Gagged, Sealed & Delivered: Reforming ECPA’s Secret Docket Stephen Wm. Smith* What is the most secret court docket in America? Many would point to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, set up during the Carter Administration to oversee requests for surveillance warrants against suspected foreign intelligence agents.1 Due to the sensitive nature of its bus- iness, FISA proceedings and records are closed to public view. Since 1979, that court has processed over 28,000 warrant applications and renewals,2 a rate of nearly one thousand secret cases a year. But the FISA court is not number one in the secrecy parade, not by a long shot. According to a recent study by the Federal Judicial Center, there is another federal docket that handles tens of thousands of secret cases every year.3 That docket is presided over by federal magistrate judges in United States district courts around the country. Most of its sealed cases are classi- fied as “warrant-type applications,” a category that includes not only routine search warrants but also various forms of electronic surveillance, such as the monitoring of electronic communications and data transmitted by the cell phones, personal computers, and other digital devices that now dominate our everyday lives. This type of electronic surveillance is regulated principally by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA).4 Although the ECPA has often been amended, most changes have been technical tweaks to the existing framework.5 Some are now pushing for an update of the ECPA, which after all was enacted over two generations ago, long before Google or the smart phone was even conceived.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Observations on the Swinging Courthouse Doors of Gannett and Richmond Newspapers
    Denver Law Review Volume 59 Issue 4 Article 5 February 2021 Some Observations on the Swinging Courthouse Doors of Gannett and Richmond Newspapers Richard M. Schmidt Jr. Gregory M. Schmidt Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/dlr Recommended Citation Richard M. Schmidt, Jr. & Gregory M. Schmidt, Some Observations on the Swinging Courthouse Doors of Gannett and Richmond Newspapers, 59 Denv. L.J. 721 (1982). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Denver Law Review at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE SWINGING COURTHOUSE DOORS OF GANNE7T AND RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS RICHARD M. SCHMIDT, JR.* GREGORY M. SCHMIDT** INTRODUCTION For nearly two hundred years, the closing of a courtroom in the United States to the press or public was an extremely rare event. In the last five years it has become commonplace. The closure motion is threatening to become a routinely employed weapon in every criminal defense attorney's arsenal and its use in civil proceedings is growing at an alarming rate. The Supreme Court has both promoted and responded to this develop- ment. It has now granted certiorari in three courtroom closure cases in the last four years. The first two decisions addressed the validity of closures designed to protect criminal defendants from the dissemination of prejudi- cial publicity. In Gannett Co. v. DePasquale,l the Court approved closure of a pretrial suppression hearing, holding that the sixth amendment right to a public trial is personal to the accused and does not provide the public or the press an independent right to attend such a proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Muse Full Album Rar Download Muse Full Album Rar
    download muse full album rar Download muse full album rar. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 67dbce8b3f554a8b • Your IP : 188.246.226.140 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. Muse – Discography (1999 – 2015) Muse – Discography (1999 – 2015) EAC Rip | 12xCD + 5xDVD + Blu-ray | FLAC Image + Cue + Log | Full Scans Included Total Size: 57.7 GB | 3% RAR Recovery STUDIO ALBUMS | LIVE ALBUMS | COMPILATION Label: Various | Genre: Alternative Rock. Muse’s fusion of progressive rock, electronica, and Radiohead-influenced experimentation have helped them sell millions of records and top charts worldwide. It’s all crafted by guitarist/vocalist Matthew Bellamy, bassist Chris Wolstenholme, and drummer Dominic Howard, a trio of friends who began playing music together in their hometown of Teignmouth, Devon; they started the first incarnation of the band at the age of 13, changing the name of the group from Gothic Plague to Fixed Penalty to Rocket Baby Dolls as time passed.
    [Show full text]