DOCSLIB.ORG

FTSE Factsheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FTSE Factsheet FTSE COMPANY REPORT Share price analysis relative to sector and index performance Data as at: 16 March 2016 Aurora Russia AURR Financial Services — GBP 0.1111 at close 16 March 2016 Absolute Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Sector Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Index PERFORMANCE 16-Mar-2016 16-Mar-2016 16-Mar-2016 0.14 150 150 1D WTD MTD YTD Absolute 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.12 140 140 Rel.Sector -0.2 -0.7 -6.5 2.8 Rel.Market -0.6 -0.6 -4.6 -1.8 0.1 130 130 VALUATION 0.08 (local currency) (local 120 120 Trailing 0.06 Relative Price Relative Price 110 110 PE -ve Absolute Price Price Absolute 0.04 EV/EBITDA -ve 100 100 0.02 PCF -ve PB 0.6 0 90 90 Price/Sales -ve Mar-2015 Jun-2015 Sep-2015 Dec-2015 Mar-2016 Mar-2015 Jun-2015 Sep-2015 Dec-2015 Mar-2016 Mar-2015 Jun-2015 Sep-2015 Dec-2015 Mar-2016 Div Yield 0.0 Absolute Price Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Div Payout 0.0 100 100 100 ROE -ve 90 90 90 Net Debt/Equity 0.0 80 80 80 70 70 70 60 60 DESCRIPTION 60 50 50 50 The principal activity of the Company is private equity 40 40 RSI (Absolute) RSI 40 investment in Russia in the financial, business and 30 30 consumer services sectors with the objective of 20 20 30 providing Ordinary Shareholders with an attractive 10 10 20 level of capital growth from investing in a diversified RSI (Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Index) UK All-Share to FTSE (Relative RSI RSI (Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Sector) UK All-Share to FTSE (Relative RSI 0 0 10 private equity portfolio. Mar-2015 Jun-2015 Sep-2015 Dec-2015 Mar-2016 Mar-2015 Jun-2015 Sep-2015 Dec-2015 Mar-2016 Mar-2015 Jun-2015 Sep-2015 Dec-2015 Mar-2016 See final page and http://www.londonstockexchange.com/prices-and-markets/stocks/services-stock/ftse-note.htm for further details. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please see the final page for important legal disclosures. 1 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Aurora Russia 16 March 2016 Valuation Metrics Price to Earnings (PE) EV to EBITDA Price to Book (PB) 29-Feb-2016 29-Feb-2016 29-Feb-2016 70 25 0.8 60 0.7 20 +1SD 50 0.6 +1SD 40 15 0.5 +1SD 30 10 0.4 Avg 20 Avg 0.3 5 -1SD 10 Avg 0.2 0 ǁǁ0 ǁǁǁǁǁǁ0.1 Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 IP Group 114.8 Paragon Group of Companies 77.1 PureTech Health 24.9 London Stock Exchange Group 45.7 IP Group 63.5 Hargreaves Lansdown 24.5 Hargreaves Lansdown 37.1 Hargreaves Lansdown 27.0 Provident Financial 7.7 Tullett Prebon 32.2 Provident Financial 24.6 City Of London Investment Group 5.6 ICAP 31.3 Arrow Global Group 18.2 Liontrust Asset Management 4.9 Financial Services 14.9 Financial Services 12.4 Financial Services 2.2 John Laing Group 6.3 International Personal Finance 2.6 3i Group 1.1 3i Group 5.9 Aberdeen Asset Management 1.0 Real Estate Credit Investments PCC 1.0 Aurora Russia -0.9 Aurora Russia 0.0 Paragon Group of Companies 0.9 PureTech Health -13.9 Allied Minds 0.0 SVG Capital 0.7 Allied Minds -25.0 PureTech Health 0.0 Aurora Russia 0.6 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 102030405060708090 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Price to Cash Flow (PCF) Dividend Yield % Price to Sales (PS) 29-Feb-2016 29-Feb-2016 29-Feb-2016 1 1 15 ǁǁ 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 10 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 +1SD 5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 Avg 0.1 0.1 0 ǁǁ0 0 ǁǁ Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Real Estate Credit Investments PCC 80.0 Aberdeen Asset Management 8.6 PureTech Health 15.0 Provident Financial 43.1 City Of London Investment Group 8.4 Allied Minds 15.0 Hargreaves Lansdown 33.7 Ashmore Group 7.4 IP Group 15.0 London Stock Exchange Group 30.4 Real Estate Credit Investments PCC 7.0 SVG Capital 15.0 Man Group 29.5 ICAP 5.4 Hargreaves Lansdown 14.7 Financial Services 16.0 Financial Services 3.2 Financial Services 3.6 Aurora Russia -3.8 Paragon Group of Companies -33.0 London Stock Exchange Group 0.9 ICAP 2.1 IP Group -33.3 SVG Capital 0.0 Investec 1.3 Close Brothers Group -50.2 IP Group 0.0 Tullett Prebon 1.1 PureTech Health -54.8 Aurora Russia 0.0 International Personal Finance 0.7 SVG Capital -61.6 Allied Minds 0.0 Aurora Russia 0.0 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 012345678910 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Note: bar chart reflects the top and bottom five current values for the valuation ratio in question for FTSE All Shares stocks in the same sector as the stock concerned. All valuation metrics are trailing. 2 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Aurora Russia 16 March 2016 Valuation Metrics Net Debt to Equity Dividend Payout (DP) Return on Equity (RoE) 29-Feb-2016 29-Feb-2016 29-Feb-2016 0.08 1 0.8 0.07 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.06 0.6 +1SD 0.7 0.05 +1SD 0.6 0.5 0.04 0.5 0.4 0.03 0.4 0.3 0.3 Avg 0.02 Avg 0.2 0.2 0.01 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 ǁǁ Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Mar-2011 Mar-2012 Mar-2013 Mar-2014 Mar-2015 Paragon Group of Companies 11.2 Intermediate Capital Group 100.0 John Laing Group 50.0 Arrow Global Group 3.5 ICAP 100.0 Hargreaves Lansdown 50.0 Provident Financial 2.4 Tullett Prebon 100.0 City Of London Investment Group 47.7 Close Brothers Group 1.8 Hargreaves Lansdown 99.3 Provident Financial 34.1 Investec 1.7 City Of London Investment Group 90.6 Henderson Group 29.7 Financial Services 1.1 Financial Services 57.1 Financial Services 15.4 Rathbone Brothers 0.0 SVG Capital 0.0 Liontrust Asset Management 0.0 Onesavings Bank 0.0 Tullett Prebon 5.7 John Laing Group 0.0 IP Group 0.0 IP Group 2.1 IG Group Holdings 0.0 Investec 0.0 Allied Minds -24.0 Aurora Russia 0.0 Aurora Russia 0.0 Aurora Russia -32.3 Aberdeen Asset Management 0.0 Allied Minds 0.0 PureTech Health -50.0 024681012 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ROE vs. PB — sector Du Pont Analysis 30 15 1.2 10 1 25 PRTC HL. 5 0.8 20 0 -5 0.6 PB 15 -10 0.4 10 -15 PFG 0.2 CLIG -20 5 IGG LIO ALM RAT LSE SUS IAP ARW BRW JUP OSB FinancialSDR ServicASHM HGG -25 0 IPO TLPR EMGADN CBG INVP ICP IPFIII JLG 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 AURR SVI PAGRECI 0 0 102030405060 Net Margin Asset Turnover Gearing ROE (rhs) ǁ ROE Note: bar chart reflects the top and bottom five current values for the valuation ratio in question for FTSE All Shares stocks in the same sector as the stock concerned. All valuation metrics are trailing. 3 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Aurora Russia 16 March 2016 Brief description Brief description Price to Earnings Price to Earnings (PE) is price over earnings per share. Earnings are based on the latest Gearing Gearing is Total Assets divided by Common Equity. Total Assets and Common Equity are (PE) available fiscal year earnings. each averaged over two years, that is, t and (t-1). Price to Sales (PS) Price to Sales (PS) is price divided by sales per share. It is based on sales from continuing Asset Turnover Asset turnover is Sales divided by Total Assets. Total Assets is averaged over two years, operations for the fiscal year. that is, t and (t-1). Price to Book (PB) Price to Book (PB) is price at the indicated date divided by common equity per share. Dupont Breakdown Return on Equity (RoE) = Net Margin * Gearing * Asset Turnover Common/ordinary equity is generally as reported at the most recent fiscal year-end but is Analysis adjusted to exclude minority interest, preferred stock and selected items as appropriate. RoE vs PB Plot of RoE versus PB at last month end for all FTSE UK All Share stocks in the sector Price to Cash Flow Price to Cash Flow (PCF) is price at the indicated date divided by cash flow per share. relative to the stock in question. Data may be limited to the stock in question if there are (PCF) currently no stocks in the corresponding FTSE UK All Share sector.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description Iresscode Exchange Current Margin New Margin 3I
    Description IRESSCode Exchange Current Margin New Margin 3I INFRASTRUCTURE PLC 3IN LSE 20 20 888 HOLDINGS PLC 888 LSE 20 20 ASSOCIATED BRITISH ABF LSE 10 10 ADMIRAL GROUP PLC ADM LSE 10 10 AGGREKO PLC AGK LSE 20 20 ASHTEAD GROUP PLC AHT LSE 10 10 ANTOFAGASTA PLC ANTO LSE 15 10 ASOS PLC ASC LSE 20 20 ASHMORE GROUP PLC ASHM LSE 20 20 ABERFORTH SMALLER COM ASL LSE 20 20 AVEVA GROUP PLC AVV LSE 20 20 AVIVA PLC AV LSE 10 10 ASTRAZENECA PLC AZN LSE 10 10 BABCOCK INTERNATIONAL BAB LSE 20 20 BARR PLC BAG LSE 25 20 BARCLAYS PLC BARC LSE 10 10 BRITISH AMERICAN TOBA BATS LSE 10 10 BAE SYSTEMS PLC BA LSE 10 10 BALFOUR BEATTY PLC BBY LSE 20 20 BARRATT DEVELOPMENTS BDEV LSE 10 10 BARING EMERGING EUROP BEE LSE 50 100 BEAZLEY PLC BEZ LSE 20 20 BH GLOBAL LIMITED BHGG LSE 30 100 BOWLEVEN PLC BLVN LSE 60 50 BANKERS INVESTMENT BNKR LSE 20 20 BUNZL PLC BNZL LSE 10 10 BODYCOTE PLC BOY LSE 20 20 BP PLC BP LSE 10 10 BURBERRY GROUP PLC BRBY LSE 10 10 BLACKROCK WORLD MININ BRWM LSE 20 65 BT GROUP PLC BT-A LSE 10 10 BRITVIC PLC BVIC LSE 20 20 BOVIS HOMES GROUP PLC BVS LSE 20 20 BROWN GROUP PLC BWNG LSE 25 20 BELLWAY PLC BWY LSE 20 20 BIG YELLOW GROUP PLC BYG LSE 20 20 CENTRAL ASIA METALS PLC CAML LSE 40 30 CLOSE BROTHERS GROUP CBG LSE 20 20 CARNIVAL PLC CCL LSE 10 10 CENTAMIN PLC CEY LSE 20 20 CHARIOT OIL & GAS LTD CHAR LSE 100 100 CHEMRING GROUP PLC CHG LSE 25 20 CONYGAR INVESTMENT CIC LSE 50 40 CALEDONIA INVESTMENTS CLDN LSE 25 20 CARILLION PLC CLLN LSE 100 100 COMMUNISIS PLC CMS LSE 50 100 CENTRICA PLC CNA LSE 10 10 CAIRN ENERGY PLC CNE LSE 30 30 COBHAM PLC
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009
    Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009 CAPITAL ANALYTICS UK REGISTRARS BENCHMARKING SURVEY 2009 September 2009 © Copyright, 2009 Capital Analytics Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission from Capital Analytics Limited. No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this report without the express prior written consent of Capital Analytics Limited. Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009 CONTENTS SURVEY PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................... 4 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 4 COMPANY SATISFACTION INDEX 2009 ........................................................................................ 6 INDUSTRY ANNUAL OVERALL COMPARISON 2005 - 2009 ...................................................... 7 OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH SERVICES .............................................................................. 8 Comments on Overall Satisfaction with Services ................................................................................ 8 Overall Satisfaction with Registrar ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Finn-Ancial Times Finncap Financials & Insurance Quarterly Sector Note
    finn-ancial Times finnCap Financials & Insurance quarterly sector note Q3 2020 | Issue 9 Highlights this quarter: Elevated uncertainty and volatility have been hallmarks of the last 18 months, with Brexit, the UK General Election and more recently COVID-19 all contributing to the challenges that face investors wishing to carve out solid and stable returns amid these ‘unprecedented’ times. With this is mind, and simulating finnCap’s proven Slide Rule methodology, we found the highest quality and lowest value stocks across the financials space, assessing how the make-up of these lists changed over the period January 2019 to July 2020, tracking indexed share price performance over the period as well as movements in P/E and EV/EBIT valuations. The top quartile list of Quality companies outperformed both the Value list and the FTSE All Share by rising +2.5% over the period versus -5.4% for the All Share and -14.3% for Value stocks. Furthermore, the Quality list had protection on the downside in the market crash between February and March 2020, and accelerated faster amid the market rally between late March and July 2020. From high to low (January to March), Quality moved -36.3% against the Value list at -45.5%, while a move off the lows to July was +37.4% for Quality and +34.0% for Value. There was some crossover between the Quality and Value lists, with 7 companies of the top quartile (16 companies in total) appearing in both the Quality and Value lists. This meant that a) investors could capture what we call ‘Quality at Value’ (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 Contents at a Glance
    IG GROUP HOLDINGS PLC ANNUAL REPORT 2016 CONTENTS AT A GLANCE COMPANY OVERVIEW ’2016 was another At a Glance 2 record year for IG, CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 4 with revenue up 14% STRATEGIC REPORT Chief Executive Officer’s Review 6 to £456.3 million. Our Business 10 Our investments in Our Product Suite 12 Our Clients and Business Model 14 improving online Our People 16 marketing, developing Our Strategic Objectives 20 new offices and Our Operational Strategy in Action 22 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 28 extending our product Business Conduct and Sustainability 30 set are beginning to Operating and Financial Review 36 Managing Our Risks 44 pay off.’ CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT Chairman’s Introduction to Corporate Governance 56 Peter Hetherington Corporate Governance Statement 57 Chief Executive Officer The Board 58 19 July 2016 Nomination Committee 68 Directors’ Remuneration Report 70 Audit Committee 90 Board Risk Committee 95 Directors’ Report 98 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 101 Independent Auditors’ Report 102 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Group Income Statement 108 Statements of Financial Position 109 Cash Flow Statements 112 Notes to the Financial Statements 113 INVESTOR RESOURCES Five-Year Summary 166 Examples 168 Glossary 174 Global Offices 177 Shareholder and Company Information 178 This report is fully accessible online at: iggroup.com/ar2016 FOUR-YEAR COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATES 5.6% 2.9% REVENUE(1) PROFIT BEFORE TAX 4.4% 8.7% 8.9% DILUTED TOTAL OWN FUNDS EARNINGS DIVIDEND GENERATED FROM PER SHARE PER SHARE OPERATIONS REVENUE(1) PROFIT BEFORE TAX OWN FUNDS GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS £456.3m £207.9m £197.9m £193.2m £400.2m £159.2m £366.8m £361.9m £370.4m £388.4m £185.7m £192.2m £194.9m £169.5m £140.7m £154.3m £160.6m £136.8m FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 DILUTED EARNINGS TOTAL DIVIDEND PER SHARE PER SHARE 44.58p 31.40p 41.07p 28.15p (1) Throughout this report Revenue refers to net trading revenue (ie excluding interest on segregated client funds and after taking account of introducing partner commissions).
    [Show full text]
  • Fund Holdings
    Wilmington International Fund as of 7/31/2021 (Portfolio composition is subject to change) ISSUER NAME % OF ASSETS ISHARES MSCI CANADA ETF 3.48% TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD 2.61% DREYFUS GOVT CASH MGMT-I 1.83% SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.79% SPDR S&P GLOBAL NATURAL RESOURCES ETF 1.67% MSCI INDIA FUTURE SEP21 1.58% TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 1.39% ASML HOLDING NV 1.29% DSV PANALPINA A/S 0.99% HDFC BANK LTD 0.86% AIA GROUP LTD 0.86% ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 0.82% TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO LTD 0.79% JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES PLC 0.78% DREYFUS GOVT CASH MGMT-I 0.75% INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 0.74% SIKA AG 0.72% NOVO NORDISK A/S 0.71% BHP GROUP LTD 0.69% PARTNERS GROUP HOLDING AG 0.65% NAVER CORP 0.61% HUTCHMED CHINA LTD 0.59% LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON SE 0.59% TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.59% HEXAGON AB 0.57% SAP SE 0.57% SK MATERIALS CO LTD 0.55% MEDIATEK INC 0.55% ADIDAS AG 0.54% ZALANDO SE 0.54% RIO TINTO LTD 0.52% MERIDA INDUSTRY CO LTD 0.52% HITACHI LTD 0.51% CSL LTD 0.51% SONY GROUP CORP 0.50% ATLAS COPCO AB 0.49% DASSAULT SYSTEMES SE 0.49% OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORP LTD 0.49% KINGSPAN GROUP PLC 0.48% L'OREAL SA 0.48% ASSA ABLOY AB 0.46% JD.COM INC 0.46% RESMED INC 0.44% COLOPLAST A/S 0.44% CRODA INTERNATIONAL PLC 0.41% AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD 0.41% STRAUMANN HOLDING AG 0.41% AMBU A/S 0.40% LG CHEM LTD 0.40% LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON SE 0.39% SOFTBANK GROUP CORP 0.39% NOVARTIS AG 0.38% HONDA MOTOR CO LTD 0.37% TOMRA SYSTEMS ASA 0.37% IMCD NV 0.37% HONG KONG EXCHANGES & CLEARING LTD 0.36% AGC INC 0.36% ADYEN
    [Show full text]
  • Stoxx® Europe Ipo (60 Months) Index
    STOXX® EUROPE IPO (60 MONTHS) INDEX Components1 Company Supersector Country Weight (%) CELLNEX TELECOM Telecommunications ES 6.13 DELIVERY HERO Retail DE 5.29 JUST EAT TAKEAWAY.COM NV Retail NL 5.21 SCOUT24 Technology DE 3.41 COVESTRO Chemicals DE 2.72 AUTO TRADER GROUP Media GB 2.50 HELLOFRESH AG Retail DE 2.18 AMUNDI Financial Services FR 2.08 KOJAMO OYJ Real Estate FI 2.00 GALENICA SANTE AG Retail CH 1.92 VAT GROUP AG Industrial Goods & Services CH 1.91 ASR NEDERLAND NV Insurance NL 1.79 SIG COMBIBLOC GROUP AG Industrial Goods & Services CH 1.72 CONVATEC PLC Health Care GB 1.70 SIGNIFY Industrial Goods & Services NL 1.54 NEXI SPA Industrial Goods & Services IT 1.50 TEAMVIEWER AG Technology DE 1.49 INWIT Telecommunications IT 1.43 AVAST PLC Technology GB 1.41 LA FRANCAISE DES JEUX Travel & Leisure FR 1.28 STADLER RAIL AG Industrial Goods & Services CH 1.19 BAWAG GROUP AG Banks AT 1.05 NETCOMPANY GROUP AS Technology DK 1.03 SOFTCAT Technology GB 0.89 PIRELLI & C. S.P.A. Automobiles & Parts IT 0.89 COUNTRYSIDE PROPERTIES PLC Personal & Household Goods GB 0.88 LANDIS GYR GROUP AG Industrial Goods & Services CH 0.86 INTEGRAFIN HOLDINGS PLC Financial Services GB 0.81 DOMETIC GROUP AB Personal & Household Goods SE 0.77 BRAVIDA HOLDING AB Industrial Goods & Services SE 0.72 SILTRONIC Technology DE 0.69 TRAINLINE PLC Travel & Leisure GB 0.68 SPIE Industrial Goods & Services FR 0.68 INTERTRUST NV Financial Services NL 0.68 ZUR ROSE GROUP Retail CH 0.66 ASCENTIAL PLC Media GB 0.64 SINCH Technology SE 0.64 Virgin Money UK Banks GB 0.62 HASTINGS
    [Show full text]
  • Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund
    Schroder UK Mid Ca p Fund plc Half Year Report and Accounts For the six months ended 31 March 2020 Key messages – Portfolio of “high conviction” stocks aiming to provide a total return in excess of the FTSE 250 (ex-Investment Companies) Index and an attractive level of yield. – Dividend has tripled since 2007 as portfolio investments have captured the cash generative nature of investee companies, in a market where income has become an increasingly important part of our investors’ anticipated returns. – Provides exposure to dynamic mid cap companies that have the potential to grow to be included in the FTSE 100 index, which are at an interesting point in their life cycle, and/or which could ultimately prove to be attractive takeover targets. – Proven research driven investment approach based on the Manager’s investment process allied with a strong selling discipline. – Managed by Andy Brough and Jean Roche with a combined 50 years’ investment experience 1, the fund has a consistent, robust and repeatable investment proces s. 1Andy Brough became Lead Manager on 1 April 2016 . Investment objective Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund plc’s (the “Company”) investment objective is to invest in mid cap equities with the aim of providing a total return in excess of the FTSE 250 (ex -Investment Companies) Index. Investment policy The strategy is to invest principally in the investment universe associated with the benchmark index, but with an element of leeway in investment remit to allow for a conviction-driven approach and an emphasis on specific companies and targeted themes. The Company may also invest in other collective investment vehicles where desirable, for example to provide exposure to specialist areas within the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • EDENTREE RESPONSIBLE and SUSTAINABLE UK EQUITY FUND SHARE CLASS a July 2021
    FUND FACTSHEET EDENTREE RESPONSIBLE AND SUSTAINABLE UK EQUITY FUND SHARE CLASS A July 2021 Investment Objective Fund Manager Commentary To achieve long-term capital appreciation over July saw the FTSE 100, FTSE 250 and FTSE small cap return 0.6%, 3.0% and 0.1% respectively. The five years or more and an income, through a prime minister announced a move to step four of the government’s coronavirus easing plan which saw diversified portfolio of UK companies. The the end of the work from home guidance, enforced wearing of face coverings and social distancing rules. EdenTree Responsible and Sustainable UK In terms of portfolio activity we took part in the IPO of Microlise, a leading provider of transport Equity Fund aims to invest at least 80% in UK management software to fleet operators helping them to improve efficiency, safety, and reduce emissions. companies whose primary listing is in the UK We added to the positions in Spectris, Johnson Services, Keller Group, National Express, Close Brothers, by investing in a portfolio of companies which Taylor Wimpey, Smith & Nephew, Prudential, Bioventix, WH Smith, IP Group, Sabre Insurance, James make a positive contribution to society and the Fisher & Sons, Clinigen, Mattioli Woods and Hotel Chocolat. We participated in a capital raise by Hotel environment through sustainable and socially Chocolat, with the funding being used to increase long term sales capacity. Fund outperformance was responsible practices. due to being overweight in Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Electronic & Electrical Equipment and Construction Materials. At a stock level, the positions in Dechra Pharmaceuticals, Genus and Halma Fund Manager aided performance, whilst Sabre Insurance and Smith & Nephew were a drag.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Finance Charter List of 273 Signatories
    Women in Finance Charter List of 273 signatories 68 new Charter signatories announced on 11 July 2018 Links to gender diversity targets to be published here in September Admiral Group AE3 Media Armstrong Wolfe Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Barrington Hibbert Associates BNP Paribas Personal Finance BondMason Bovill Ltd Bower Recruitment Brooks Macdonald plc Canada Life Coventry Building Society Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd EIS Association Ellis Davies Financial Planning Ltd Engage Financial Services Ltd Equifax Ltd Evolution Financial Planning Fintech Strategic Advisors Ltd Fintellect Recruitment First Wealth LLP Flood Re Ltd Foresight Franklin Templeton Investments GAM Global Processing Services Goji Investments Grant Thornton Hinckley and Rugby Building Society HUBX ICAEW Intermediate Capital Group Investec Asset Management Limited 11 July 2018 11 July 2018 J. P. Morgan Kames Capital plc Lazard & Co Limited Lazard Asset Management Limited LifeSearch Magenta Financial Planning Marsh Ltd Medianett Ltd Mortgages for Businesses Ltd MT Finance Ltd Mustard Seed Impact Ltd National Association of Commercial Finance Brokers Nomura International PIMCO Prytania Solutions Limited Pukka Insure Ltd Rathbone Brothers plc Scottish Equity Partners SDB Bookkeeping Services Semper Capital Management Shepherd Compello Ltd St. James’s Place plc Stonehaven International Sussex Independent Financial Advisers Ltd Tesco Underwriting The British United Provident Association (BUPA) The Meyer Partnership The Mortgage & Insurance Bureau TP
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE UK 100 ESG Select
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE UK 100 ESG Select Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Constituent Index weight (%) Country Constituent Index weight (%) Country Constituent Index weight (%) Country 3i Group 0.83 UNITED KINGDOM Halfords Group 0.06 UNITED KINGDOM Prudential 2.67 UNITED KINGDOM 888 Holdings 0.08 UNITED KINGDOM Harbour Energy PLC 0.01 UNITED KINGDOM Rathbone Brothers 0.08 UNITED KINGDOM Anglo American 2.62 UNITED KINGDOM Helical 0.03 UNITED KINGDOM Reckitt Benckiser Group 3.01 UNITED KINGDOM Ashmore Group 0.13 UNITED KINGDOM Helios Towers 0.07 UNITED KINGDOM Rio Tinto 4.8 UNITED KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.65 UNITED KINGDOM Hiscox 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM River and Mercantile Group 0.01 UNITED KINGDOM Aviva 1.18 UNITED KINGDOM HSBC Hldgs 6.33 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Dutch Shell A 4.41 UNITED KINGDOM Barclays 2.15 UNITED KINGDOM Imperial Brands 1.09 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Dutch Shell B 3.85 UNITED KINGDOM Barratt Developments 0.52 UNITED KINGDOM Informa 0.56 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Mail 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.29 UNITED KINGDOM Intermediate Capital Group 0.44 UNITED KINGDOM Schroders 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM BP 4.66 UNITED KINGDOM International Personal Finance 0.02 UNITED KINGDOM Severn Trent 0.44 UNITED KINGDOM British American Tobacco 4.75 UNITED KINGDOM Intertek Group 0.66 UNITED KINGDOM Shaftesbury 0.12 UNITED KINGDOM Britvic 0.19 UNITED KINGDOM IP Group 0.09 UNITED KINGDOM Smith (DS) 0.4 UNITED KINGDOM BT Group 1.26 UNITED KINGDOM Johnson Matthey 0.43 UNITED KINGDOM Smurfit Kappa Group 0.76 UNITED KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.62 UNITED KINGDOM Jupiter Fund Management 0.09 UNITED KINGDOM Spirent Communications 0.11 UNITED KINGDOM Cairn Energy 0.05 UNITED KINGDOM Kingfisher 0.57 UNITED KINGDOM St.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Reporting by Investment Managers
    Financial reporting by investment managers The need for clarity December 2015 kpmg.co.uk © 2015 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent Financial reporting by Investment Managers member firms affiliated with KPMG International (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 02 Executive summary Contents 04 Benchmarking 12 Survey 18 Narrative reporting 24 Corporate Governance 26 Remuneration 29 Accounting update 34 Conclusion © 2015 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Financial reporting by Investment Managers 01 01Executive summary Welcome to the 2015 A complex task more information in reports – without fully considering how that information edition of Financial Factors such as increased regulation is selected, presented and structured Reporting by Investment and market volatility are impacting – preparers will deliver documents that upon performance. In this respect, are opaque rather than enlightening. Managers. there is a real challenge inherent in As new risks emerge, arguably one of The investment industry is working in preparing reports that take account of these factors, while also providing the greatest challenges is to quantify an ever-more complex environment. the threats in a way that is meaningful. Businesses in the sector are not only a true and accurate picture of the performance of individual businesses This year’s reports suggest that cyber faced with tighter regulation, at a time risk, in particular, has been under when investor pressure to deliver that can be compared to reports published by other firms in the sector.
    [Show full text]