www.britishspiders.org.uk Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 139

Where the hand-lens symbol is used, it would be useful to this book will equip recorders to learn both the have an explicit indication of what should be looked for possibilities and the limitations of identifying British with the lens. I suspect that it may currently often be used in the field. It stands to enrich the way we learn to indicate that more caution and circumspection is about spider identification and provide a useful staging required when looking at all the morphological features point for those that want to move on to the identification described, but this should be made clear. of preserved specimens. I commend this book to all those The book keeps on giving! After the accounts interested in identifying and recording British spiders. come additional useful sections on working in the field, recording spiders & the S.R.S., legislation & conservation, Richard Burkmar further reading and the B.A.S. There is a large table listing all British species (including the small money spiders – linyphiids – which aren’t included in the species accounts), with full details on common and scientific Record of (Araneae: name (including the authority and synonyms), the Ctenidae) from Inverbervie, identification difficulty symbol, conservation status, Aberdeenshire relevant legislation and the percentage of 10 km squares in Britain where the species has been recorded. There is by Chris Cathrine* & Stuart Longhorn also a page reference to the species account where applicable. It’s handy to have this information together in A spider specimen found in a shipment in a single reference table. Inverbervie, Aberdeenshire in June 2016 was sent to Chris The book will be a useful resource to anyone Cathrine for identification by Andy Evans at Scotland’s interested in spider identification at any level, but will Rural College (SRUC). Unfortunately the specimen was particularly benefit the growing number of naturalists in not preserved in alcohol, and so was damaged in the post the UK who favour field identification over collecting and (Fig. 1). However, many key features were still present preserving specimens. There is a legitimate concern that which allowed further identification, although desiccation this trend represents a threat to the quality of spider caused the specimen to become brittle and challenging to recording in the UK and is therefore worth examining in a work with. little more detail. The trend is likely driven by many The banana shipment reportedly originated in things including: , , and the spider was identified • Huge advances in the quality and accessibility of digital macro by Chris Cathrine as female and belonging to the family photography equipment. Ctenidae, and so not native to Scotland or the UK (Ubick • Popularity of social media platforms that have helped leverage et al., 2005; Jocqué & Dippenaar-Schoeman, 2006; the power of digital photography as an identification tool (e.g. Murphy & Roberts, 2015). Figure 2 shows the eye the facebook British Spider Identification Group). arrangement of the specimen, which is characteristic of • Increasing recognition amongst the established natural history Ctenidae. SRUC requested that the specimen be returned and recording community that quality macro photography is after family level identification. Before returning the opening-up some taxa to reliable field identification, where specimen, photographs were taken to allow a more precise previously microscopic examination of preserved specimens identification if possible (Figs. 2–5). Further identification was the norm. assistance was provided by Stuart Longhorn, who is more • Growing trend to record across several taxonomic groups in familiar with South American Ctenidae. the field. The specimen was identified as belonging to the • Cultural shift resulting in fewer new naturalists being willing Phoneutria, with a plausible identity being P. boliviensis to collect specimens for identification. based on several features: epigyne, ventral abdomen pattern, central dorsal stripe on carapace, black stripe on Some worry that this change may represent a threat to the front of , and white based spines on femurs ongoing development of a vital pool of people with skills (Pickard-Cambridge 1897; Schiapelli & Gerschman de in microscopic identification and the collection and Pikelin, 1973; Valerio 1983; Simó & Brescovit, 2001; curation of spiders. I don’t see it that way; I believe that in Martins & Bertani, 2007; Jäger & Blick, 2009; Azevedo the past many people were alienated from spider recording 2012). Photographs of some of these features are shown in and identification because even introductory courses Figures 1–5, and a diagram of the epigyne is shown in started at the level of collection, curation and microscopic identification. With a more structured development path and opportunities to make a valuable contribution to spider recording at different levels, including field identification only, we stand to retain more of that early interest. Some of those who start with the intention of only recording spiders in the field may become sufficiently absorbed to move on to collection, curation and microscopic identification. Those who don’t can continue to make a valuable contribution with field identification alone; potentially, thanks to this book, a bigger contribution than was formerly the case. The WILDGuide, Britain’s Spiders – a field guide, is a masterful example of a modern field guide for an group. Like any identification resource, it is not a magic bullet and it is incumbent on all those involved in teaching spider identification, particularly field identification, to teach people how to use the book Figure 1. Ctenidae specimen from Inverbervie, responsibly and not to exceed the boundaries of what can identified as Phoneutria cf. boliviensis. © Chris be reliably identified in the field. When used diligently Cathrine.

13 Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 139 www.britishspiders.org.uk

Figure 4. Ventral abdomen pattern (lines of white dots – arrowed), which is considered characteristic of Phoneutria cf. boliviensis in some reference sources and the experience of Stuart Longhorn. © Chris Cathrine.

Figure 2. Eye arrangement of specimen, characteristic of Ctenidae. © Chris Cathrine.

Figure 6. As currently known, P. boliviensis also appears to be the most widely distributed member of the Phoneutria genus, which ranges across much of Colombia (Hazzi et al., 2013) and beyond. However, there is a great deal of variation (epigyne, markings and other features) in published accounts of P. boliviensis and close relatives, potentially suggesting the existence of cryptic species. Therefore, without finer-scale taxonomic revision it is Figure 5. Retrolateral photo of . © Chris only possible to identify this spider as Phoneutria cf. boliviensis with confidence. Cathrine. Media increasingly report instances of ‘Brazilian wandering spiders’ or ‘painful erection death spiders’ (Phoneutria spp.) being imported to the UK in spp. being imported into Germany with and other fruit shipments, and often sensationalise the risks to such cargo (after Schmidt, 1954, 1956), as well as recently human health. Chris Cathrine has been contacted by to both Germany (Jäger & Blick, 2009) and the USA media and other organisations several times in 2016 with (Vetter & Hillebrecht, 2008; Vetter et al., 2014), although claims that these tropical spiders had been found, but no encounters are rare, and often are initially specimens were ever provided to confirm identity. misidentified. However, a handful of valid encounters appear to have Phoneutria can be harmful to humans, but the occurred in the UK, but most are not properly recorded or severity of these effects varies depending on species, are remain unverified (but see e.g. Binding & Binding, 2014). often insignificant and rarely result in fatality (Lucas There are several reliable historical records of Phoneutria 1988; Foelix 1996; Vetter & Hillebrecht, 2008). Phoneutria cf. boliviensis is the more common of any Phoneutria found in cargo shipments, but rarely bites and, although painful, these do not seem to have the more serious effects sometimes associated with closely related P. nigriventer and P. keyserlingi (Vetter & Hillebrecht, 2008). Due to the conditions of transport and pest control, tropical ctenids imported to the UK in cargo shipments are often likely to be dead on arrival, and would not survive in Scotland’s climate. However, given the varying medical importance of Ctenidae species, particularly Phoneutria spp., identification and recording of other specimens found in the UK is advisable in future. It is hoped that publishing this record will help inform a more robust Figure 3. Epigyne of specimen. © Chris Cathrine. understanding of the occurrence of Phoneutria spp. as

14 www.britishspiders.org.uk Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 139

Pickard-Cambridge, F. O. 1897. On cteniform spiders from the lower Amazons and other regions of North and South America, with a list of all known species of these groups hitherto recorded from the New World. Ann. mag. nat. hist., 19: 52–106. Schiapelli, R. D. & Gerschman de Pikelin, B. S. 1973. Diagnosis de (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897) y de (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897) (Araneae, Ctenidae). Rev. Soc. Entomológica , 34: 31–38. Schmidt, G. 1954. Zur Herkunftsbestimmung von Bananenimporten nach dem Besatz an Spinnen. Z. Angew. Zool., 36: 400–422. Schmidt, G. 1956. Genus- und Speziesdiagnosen neuer, mit Bananen eingeschleppter Spinnen nebst Mitteilung über das Auffinden der Männchen zweier Spinnenarten. Zool. Anz., 157: 24–31. Simó, M. & Brescovit, A. D. 2001. Revision and cladistics analysis of the Neotropical spider genus Phoneutria Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Ctenidae), with notes on related Ctenidae. Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc., 12: 67–82. Ubick, D., Paquin, P., Cushing, P. E. & Roth, V. (eds). 2005. Spiders of North America: an Identification Manual. American Arachnological Society. Valerio, C. E. 1983. Sobre la presencia de Phoneutria boliviensis Figure 6. Epigyne of Phoneutria cf. boliviensis from (F.O. P.-Cambridge) (Araneae, Ctenidae) en . J. Inverbervie. Scale bar 1 mm. Note that the specimen , 11: 101–102. was desiccated when the drawing was made, and so Vetter, R. S. & Hillebrecht, S. 2008. Distinguishing two often- some features may have warped from their normal misidentified genera (, Phoneutria) (Araneae: position in life (for example the lateral ‘hook’ Ctenidae) of large spiders found in Central and South processes seem to be further apart than in drawings American cargo shipments. Am. Entomol., 54: 88–93. Vetter, R. S., Crawford, R. L. & Buckle, D. J. 2014. Spiders of epigynes from specimens of ostensibly the same (Araneae) found in bananas and other international cargo species in other literature). submitted to North American arachnologists for identification. J. Med. Ent., 51: 1136–1143. ship-assisted vagrants in the UK, as a more reliable *Caledonian Conservation Ltd, Office 2 and 3, Craigarnhall, reference than mainstream media reports. Bridge of Allan, Stirling, FK9 4NG; e-mail: [email protected]

Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Andy Evans (SRUC) for kindly permitting the publication of this record. B.A.S. Field Weekend at Kingcombe References Field Centre, Devon, 17th–19th June Azevedo, G. H. F. 2012. Sistemática e evolução de aranhas- 2016 armadeiras (Ctenidae: Phoneutria) a partir de evidências moleculares, morfológicas e ecológicas. Dissertação by Richard C. Gallon apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre do Instituto de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Members of the B.A.S. (Fig. 1) arrived on Friday 17th Gerais, como requisite parcial para a obtenção do titulo de June 2016 for a weekend packed with fieldwork, lectures, mestre em Ecologia. socialising and, of course, to attend the 47th A.G.M. that Binding, A. & Binding, A. 2014. The Whatmough Collection of evening. The venue being Dorset Wildlife Trust’s well- spiders. S.R.S. News. No. 78. In Newsl. Br. Arachnol. Soc., appointed Kingcombe Centre. 129: 15–16. The following day many joined the road convoy to Foelix, R. F. 1996. Biology of Spiders. 2nd edn. Oxford Powerstock Common SSSI to record spiders (Fig. 2), University Press. finding 89 species in total (Table 1). Geoff Oxford gave a Hazzi, N. A., Valderrama-Ardila, C., Brescovit, A.D., Polotow, fascinating lecture on spider polymorphism that evening, D. & Simó, M. 2013. New records and geographical distribution of ctenid spiders (Araneae: Ctenidae) in after running an identification course for much of the day. Colombia. Zootaxa, 3709: 243–254. Fieldwork on Sunday was challenging, but some hardy Jäger, P. & Blick, T. 2009. Zur Identifikation einer nach folks braved the wet weather to records around the Field Deutschland eingeschleppten Kammspinnenart (Araneae: Centre and adjacent Kingcombe Meadows Nature Reserve Ctenidae: Phoneutria boliviensis). Arachnologische (Table 1). All too soon it was time to say our farewells to Mitteilungen, 38: 33–36. old and new friends alike, safe in the knowledge that we Jocqué, R. & Dippenaar-Schoeman, A. S. 2006. Spider Families would probably meet-up at a future A.G.M. Weekend. of the World. Royal Museum for Central Africa. Species lists provided by Iain Arter, Richard Gallon, Lucas, S. 1988. Spiders in . Toxicon, 26: 759–772. Alastair Lavery, Geoff Oxford, Jim Pewtress and Tony Martins, R. & Bertrani, R. 2007. The non-Amazonian species of the Brazilian wandering spiders of the genus Phoneutria Russell-Smith. Perty, 1833 (Araneae: Ctenidae), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa, 1526: 1–36. 23A Roumania Crescent, LLANDUDNO, LL30 1UP. Murphy, J. A. & Roberts, M. J. 2015. Spider Families of the World and their . British Arachnological Society, York.

15