Regular Council Meeting May 28, 2012 4:00 p.m. To be held in Council Chambers Page
1. Call To Order
2. Opening Prayer
● Led by Pastor Dan Sudfield of the Mission Church 3. Public Hearing
4. Adoption of Agenda and Added Items
5. Minutes 4-10 a) Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That Council approve the Minutes for the May 14, 2012 Regular Council Meeting.
6. Delegations 11-119 a) LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That City Council accept the presentation and report from LPS Aviation as Information.
7. Department Reports 120-131 a) Monthly Financial Report - Presented By: Alderman Patricia MacQuarrie
Motion Proposed By Administration (I Move) That City Council receive the financial report as presented for the period ending April 30, 2012. 132-139 b) Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That Council receive the department reports as information.
8. Council Reports 140-149 a) Commitee Report - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Motion Proposed by Administration : (I Move) that the JEDI Committee Report be accpted as information.
Page 1 of 177 Page
9. Bylaws
10. Development and Subdivision Agreements
11. Tenders
12. New and Unfinished Business 150-152 a) Request for Road Closure - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That City Council authorize the road closure on 50 Street between 46 and 47 Avenues with the conditions that the hydrants on the corners of 46 Avenue and 47 Avenue remain accessible to the fire department and that there be no impairments to their movements on 46 and 47 Avenues. 153-155 b) Pioneer Days - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Motion Proposed By Administration: ( I Move) That City Council authorize the road closure on 50 Avenue between 56 and 50 Street and 50 Street from 50 Avenue to 47 Avenue from 10:30 a.m. until the end of the parade. 156-157 c) Weed Inspector Appointment - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree
Motion Proposed By Administration (I Move) That City Council appoint Danielle Fredericksen as a municipal weed inspector for the City of Wetaskiwin. 158-159 d) Director of Emergency Management - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That City Council appoints Fire Chief, Merlin Klassen as the Director of Emergency Management for the City of Wetaskiwin. 160-162 e) Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society 2012 Deficit Presented By - Alderman Mark McFaul
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That City Council authorize Administration to release $50,000 to the Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society to offset its projected 2012 deficit with funding to come from the unspecified reserve.
13. Council Schedule 163-164 a) Council Schedule - Presented By: Alderman Dale Crabtree
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That Council accept
Page 2 of 177 Page
13. Council Schedule the Council schedule as information.
14. Correspondence 165-170 a) Administrative Action Sheet - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That Council accept the Administrative Action Sheet as information. 171-177 b) Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie
Motion Proposed By Administration: (I Move) That Council receive all correspondence as information.
15. In Camera Items
16. Motion To Adjourn
Page 3 of 177 Agenda Item # 5a)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012
Department Therese Myndio, Representative: Assistant City Manager
Alderman Presented By: Joe Branco
Minutes
City Council must approve the Minutes from previous City of Issue Wetaskiwin Council meetings before they become official.
Motion Proposed (I Move) That Council approve the Minutes for the May 14, 2012 By Administration Regular Council Meeting.
Background
Administration Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Approval Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
1 | P a g e
Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 4 of 177 Agenda Item # 5a)
MINUTES OF THE CITY OF WETASKIWIN REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL MONDAY, MAY14, 2012 AT 4:00 P.M.
Present Mayor Bill Elliot Alderman Mark McFaul Alderman Patricia MacQuarrie Alderman Joe Branco Alderman Dale Crabtree Alderman Barry Hawkes Alderman Glenn Ruecker
Staff Present Ted Gillespie, City Manager Therese Myndio, Assistant City Manager
Call to Order Mayor Bill Elliot called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
The opening prayer was led Mike Dueck of the Full Gospel Church.
Public Hearing A Public Hearing on Bylaw 1791-12 – Downtown District Overlay was held. Mayor Bill Elliot opened the Public Hearing at 4:02 p.m.
Written notice was given to effected property owners and public notice given in the April 25 and May 2 editions of the Wetaskiwin Times.
Lisa Novotny, Development Manager, and Jason Tran, Manager West Central Planning, were in attendance to present on the proposed Bylaw.
No written submissions were received from the public.
No Members of the public were in attendance to present at the public hearing.
Mayor Elliot closed the Public Hearing at 4:09 p.m.
Adoption of Agenda & Added Items
142/12 ALDERMAN HAWKES MOVED that the Agenda be accepted as presented.
CARRIED
Approval of Minutes The Minutes April 10, 2012 Regular Council Meeting and the April 10, 2012 In Camera Council Meeting were provided to Council.
143/12 ALDERMAN MACQUARRIE MOVED that the Minutes of the April 23, 2012 In Camera Council Meeting be accepted as amended.
Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 5 of 177 Agenda Item # 5a)
Regular Council Meeting May 14, 2012 Page 2 of 6
CARRIED 144/12 ALDERMAN MACQUARRIE MOVED that the Minutes of the April 23, 2012 Regular Council Meeting be accepted as amended.
CARRIED
Delegations Wetaskiwin Emergency Services presented a demonstration of the communication capabilities from emergency scenes to the City’s Emergency Operations Centre (EOC).
145/12 ALDERMAN HAWKES MOVED that Council receive the report and demonstration on the City’s emergency services communication as information.
CARRIED
Council Reports A detailed list of meetings and events attended by members of Council was provided for information.
146/12 ALDERMAN RUECKER MOVED that Council receive the Council Reports as information.
CARRIED Bylaws
Bylaw 1791-12 Downtown District Overlay Bylaw 1791 – 12 Downtown District Overlay was brought forward to Council for Second and Third reading. First reading for Bylaw 1791-12 was given on April 23, 2012. A public hearing on the Bylaw was held at the May 14, 2012 Regular Council Meeting.
147/12 ALDERMAN CRABTREE MOVED that City Council give second reading to Bylaw 1791-12.
Discussion ensued on the impact of Bylaw 1791-12 on the Downtown area and what types of developments would be affected.
CARRIED
148/12 ALDERMAN CRABTREE MOVED that City Council give third and final reading to Bylaw 1791-12.
CARRIED
Bylaw 1792-12 2012 Tax Rates In accordance with the Municipal Government Act, Council must annually approve a bylaw to authorize the levy and collection of taxes.
Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 6 of 177 Agenda Item # 5a)
Regular Council Meeting May 14, 2012 Page 3 of 6
First reading of Bylaw 1792-12 was passed at the April 23, 2012 Regular Council Meeting. Second and Third Reading of Bylaw 1792 – 12 were presented to Council for consideration.
149/12 ALDERMAN BRANCO MOVED that City Council give second reading to Bylaw 1792-12.
CARRIED
150/12 ALDERMAN BRANCO MOVED that City Council give third and final reading to Bylaw 1792-12.
CARRIED Tenders
2012 Crack Filling The Public Works Department releases tenders for crack filling on major City streets and the Airport annually.
The tenders responses were brought forward for Council Consideration.
151/12 ALDERMAN MCFAUL MOVED that City Council authorize administration to enter into an agreement with Federal Joint Sealing Co. of Canada Ltd for crack filling services at a cost of Seventy-six thousand, six hundred and eighty dollars ($76,680.00) excluding GST.
CARRIED
Northeast Lift Station and Blower Buildings Roof Replacement The Public Works Department presented the replacement of the Northeast Lift Station and the Blower buildings roofs during the 2012 budget.
This project was approved in the 2012 Budget. Tenders have been received for the project and the tenders responses were brought forward for Council Consideration.
152/12 ALDERMAN MACQUARRIE MOVED that City Council authorize Administration to enter into an agreement with Knights Roofing Ltd. for the replacement of the Northeast Lift Station and Blower buildings roofs for the sum of $52,597.00, not including GST.
CARRIED
Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 7 of 177 Agenda Item # 5a)
Regular Council Meeting May 14, 2012 Page 4 of 6
New Business
Development Contributions Administration has received the 2012 Development Contribution applications. These requests were brought forward for Council consideration.
153/12 ALDERMAN HAWKES MOVED that City Council authorize the 2012 Development Contributions on Roll 142090 in the amount of $857.41.
CARRIED
Requested Tax Cancellations Applications have been made by the Wetaskiwin Moose Lodge and the Wetaskiwin Masonic Hall under the Community Organization Property Tax Exemption Regulation (COPTER). As these organizations do not qualify under COPTER, they have asked Council to consider cancelling the municipal portion of their property taxes.
To fulfill the obligations as established in agreements between the City of Wetaskiwin and the Lion’s Club and Knights of Columbus, annually Council must consider a motion to cancel the entire property tax levy.
154/12 ALDERMAN RUECKER MOVED that City Council cancel the municipal portion of property taxes on Rolls 210210 (the Moose Hall) and Roll 180900 and 180910 (the Masonic Hall) under the authority of Section 347(1) of the Municipal Government Act.
CARRIED
155/12 ALDERMAN RUECKER MOVED that City Council cancel the total tax levy for Roll 360020 (Lion’s Campground) in accordance with the lease agreement dated October 10, 1995 given the authority of Section 347(1) of the Municipal Government Act.
CARRIED
156/12 ALDERMAN RUECKER MOVED that City Council cancel the total tax levy for Roll 390070 (Knights of Columbus) in accordance with the lease agreement dated July 22, 1996 given the authority of Section 347(1) of the Municipal Government Act.
CARRIED
Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 8 of 177 Agenda Item # 5a)
Regular Council Meeting May 14, 2012 Page 5 of 6
AZ Wetaskiwin Storage Development Permit The current owner of 6306 – 47 Avenue (AZ Wetaskiwin Storage) has applied for a development permit to construct a 48’ x 240’ pole shed for the purpose of storing recreational vehicles. As this property is currently zoned Direct Control Environmental Management (DCEM), approval from City Council is required.
157/12 ALDERMAN CRABTREE MOVED that City Council approve development permit application #12D049 for the purpose of constructing a 48’ x 240’ storage building on the north portion of the parcel of land legally described as Plan 0123164, Lot 8 (6306 – 47 Avenue).
CARRIED
Policy 6103 Cash In Lieu of Parking Policy 6103 – Cash in Lieu of Parking was approved by Council in 1992 and revised in 1994. Given the changes to the Land Use Bylaw in recent years, and the proposal of the Downtown District Overlay, Policy 6103 requires updating.
158/12 ALDERMAN BRANCO MOVED that City Council approve Policy 6103 – Cash in Lieu of Parking Policy as amended.
CARRIED
City Manager Contract The contract for the City Manager is being brought forward for Council decision today.
159/12 ALDERMAN MACQUARRIE MOVED that City Council authorize the execution of an Employment Contract with City Manager Ted Gillespie, as reviewed during the in 2012- 04-23 In Camera meeting, to be effective May 15th, 2012.
CARRIED
Council Schedule An upcoming schedule of events was presented to Council for information.
160/12 ALDERMAN HAWKES MOVED that the Council schedule be received by Council as information.
CARRIED
Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 9 of 177 Agenda Item # 5a)
Regular Council Meeting May 14, 2012 Page 6 of 6
Correspondence The following correspondence was provided for Council information.
a) Legion Thank You
b) Jumpstart Program
161/12 ALDERMAN RUECKER MOVED that Council receive all correspondence as information.
CARRIED
Adjournment
162/12 ALDERMAN RUECKER MOVED that the meeting be adjourned at 5:14 p.m.
CARRIED
______MAYOR
______CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Minutes - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 10 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Ted Lennox, Representative: LPS Aviation
Alderman Presented By: Mark McFaul LPS Aviation Report
At the December 12, 2011 Regular Council Meeting LPS Aviation was awarded a contract to conduct an economic analysis of the Wetaskiwin Airport. Issue
This study has been completed and is being brought forward for Council’s information today.
Executive Mr. Ted Lennox is in attendance to present the report from LPS Summary Aviation.
Motion Proposed (I Move) That City Council accept the presentation and report from By Administration LPS Aviation as Information.
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
Strategic Plan This report will provide information on the strategic plan action item Action Items “Develop a strategy for enhancing service level at the airport”.
Municipal Plans N/A
Policies N/A and Bylaws
Other Legislation N/A or Agreements
Financial The proposed action is in compliance with the 2012 Municipal Budget. Implications
1 | P a g e
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 11 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
A user group meeting at the Wetaskiwin Airport will be held to present Next Steps the findings of this report.
Communication This report will be made available as public information Strategy
1. --- Alternate Options
Department Head TG
City Manager Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 12 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Business Case For Runway Extension
Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 13 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 14 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Business Case for Runway Extension Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
Prepared for:
Mr. Ted Gillespie, P.Eng. City Manager City of Wetaskiwin 4705 – 50 Avenue Wetaskiwin, AB T9A 2E9
Date
April 25, 2012
Submitted by:
LPS Aviation Inc. One Antares Drive, Suite 250 Ottawa, Ontario CANADA K2E 8C4
Tel: (613) 226-6050 Fax: (613) 226-5236 e-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.lpsaviation.ca
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 15 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 16 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ...... 1-1 1.1 Approach ...... 1-1 1.2 Community Consultations ...... 1-1 1.2.1 Public Officials ...... 1-1 1.2.2 Airport Businesses and Users ...... 1-2 1.2.3 Local Businesses...... 1-2 1.2.4 Community ...... 1-2 1.2.5 Potential Airport Businesses ...... 1-2 1.2.6 Stakeholder Consultations ...... 1-3 2 Regional Context Review ...... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ...... 2-1 2.2 Population ...... 2-1 2.3 Industry ...... 2-2 2.3.1 Heavy Industry...... 2-2 2.3.2 Light Industry ...... 2-2 2.3.3 Agriculture ...... 2-2 2.3.4 Wetaskiwin Industry ...... 2-2 2.4 Regional Airports ...... 2-3 3 Market Assessment and Forecasting ...... 3-1 3.1 Market Assessment ...... 3-1 3.1.1 Scheduled Passenger Services ...... 3-1 3.1.2 Charter Passenger Services ...... 3-1 3.1.3 Air Cargo ...... 3-2 3.1.4 Aviation Maintenance and Support ...... 3-2 3.1.5 Government and Health Services ...... 3-2 3.2 Traffic Forecasts ...... 3-3 3.2.1 Assumptions and Methodology ...... 3-3 3.2.2 Historical Traffic ...... 3-3 3.2.3 Traffic Growth Forecasts ...... 3-3
Business Case for Runway Extension ii Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 17 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
4 Airport Financial Review ...... 4-1 4.1 Budget Sustainability ...... 4-1 4.1.1 Revenues ...... 4-1 4.1.2 Expenditures ...... 4-1 5 Development Plan Review ...... 5-1 5.1 2010 Airport Development Plan Update ...... 5-1 5.1.1 Purpose ...... 5-1 5.1.2 Studies Referenced ...... 5-1 5.1.3 Development Plan ...... 5-1 5.1.4 Development Options ...... 5-2 5.1.5 Phasing ...... 5-2 5.2 Development Plan Review ...... 5-2 5.2.1 Extension Justification ...... 5-2 5.2.2 Design Aircraft ...... 5-3 5.2.3 Aerodrome Reference Code ...... 5-3 5.3.4 Infrastructure Requirement ...... 5-3 6 Competitive Airports Assessment ...... 6-1 6.1 Competitive Airport Selection...... 6-1 6.2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport ...... 6-1 6.3 Competitive Airports ...... 6-2 6.3.1 Camrose ...... 6-2 6.3.2 Cooking Lake ...... 6-2 6.3.3 Edmonton International ...... 6-2 6.3.4 Josephburg ...... 6-3 6.3.5 Ponoka Industrial ...... 6-3 6.4 Competitive Analysis ...... 6-4 6.4.1 Strengths ...... 6-4 6.4.2 Weaknesses ...... 6-4 6.4.3 Opportunities ...... 6-4 6.4.4 Threats ...... 6-5
Business Case for Runway Extension iii Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 18 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
7 Options Identification ...... 7-1 7.1 Options Identification ...... 7-1 7.2 Development Plan Options ...... 7-1 7.2.1 Option 1: 5,000 ft Runway ...... 7-1 7.2.2 Option 2: 5,500 ft Runway ...... 7-1 7.3 Alternative Options ...... 7-4 7.3.1 Option 3: Status Quo ...... 7-4 7.3.2 Option 4: Modest Improvements ...... 7-4 7.4 Cost Comparison ...... 7-6 8 Business Case ...... 8-1 8.1 Revenue Opportunities ...... 8-1 8.1.1 Airport Fees ...... 8-1 8.1.2 Fly-in Camping ...... 8-2 8.2 Revenue and Expense Forecast ...... 8-2 8.3 Revenue and Capital Cost Comparison ...... 8-3 8.4 Business Case Summary ...... 8-4 9 Conclusions and Recommendations ...... 9-1 9.1 Conclusions ...... 9-1 9.2 Recommendations ...... 9-1 Appendix A – Central Alberta Population Distribution ...... A-1 Appendix B – Aircraft Movement Forecasts ...... B-1 Appendix C – Historical Financial Statements ...... C-1
Business Case for Runway Extension iv Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 19 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
List of Figures Figure 2-1 – Edmonton Region Industrial Activity ...... 2-4 Figure 2-2 – Future General Aviation Development Area – Edmonton International Airport ...... 2-4 Figure 3-1 – Aircraft Operating Costs per Available Seat-Kilometre ...... 3-1 Figure 3-1 – Wetaskiwin Forecasted Aircraft Movements ...... 3-4 Figure 4-1 – 2010 Actual Revenue / Operating Revenue Comparison ...... 4-2 Figure 6-1 – Regional Context – Airports and Air Services ...... 6-5 Figure 7-1 – Development Option 1: 5,000 ft ...... 7-2 Figure 7-2 – Development Option 2: 5,500 ft ...... 7-3 Figure 7-3 – Development Option 3: Modest Improvements ...... 7-5 Figure 8-1 – Impact of Fee Implementation on Financial Performance...... 8-3
List of Tables Table 1-1 – Wetaskiwin Regional Airport - Stakeholder Consultation List ...... 1-3 Table 2-1 – Alberta Population Change 2006-2011 ...... 2-1 Table 2-2 – Edmonton Airports ...... 2-3 Table 4-1 – Actual Revenue /Operating Revenue Comparison 2007-2010 ...... 4-2 Table 5-1 – PLR Requirement by Aircraft Type ...... 5-3 Table 6-1 – Wetaskiwin Airport Characteristics...... 6-1 Table 6-2 – Camrose Airport Characteristics ...... 6-2 Table 6-3 – Cooking Lake Airport Characteristics ...... 6-2 Table 6-4 – Edmonton International Airport Characteristics ...... 6-3 Table 6-5 – Josephburg Airport Characteristics ...... 6-3 Table 6-6 – Ponoka Industrial Airport Characteristics ...... 6-3 Table 7-1 – Option 1 Cost Estimate ...... 7-1 Table 7-2 – Option 2 Cost Estimate ...... 7-1 Table 7-3 – Option 3 Cost Estimate ...... 7-4 Table 7-4 – Option 4 Cost Estimate ...... 7-4 Table 7-5 – Development Option Cost Comparison ...... 7-6 Table 8-1 – Proposed Aircraft Landing Fees ...... 8-1 Table 8-2 – Proposed Aircraft Parking Fees ...... 8-2 Table 8-3 – Potential Annual Airport Revenue*...... 8-2 Table 8-4 – 20 Year Revenue and Capital Cost Comparison* ...... 8-3 Table 8-5 – Market Demand and Business Case Summary ...... 8-4
Business Case for Runway Extension v Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 20 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
1 Introduction
1.1 Approach 7. Development options consistent with the market assessment and forecasts were identified and The Wetaskiwin Regional Airport Business Case for evaluated against the two development options Runway Expansion study was undertaken in a series presented in the 2010 update based on of steps. estimated implementation costs and demonstrated user requirements. 1. A high-level regional context review was undertaken. This review focused on local and 8. The impacts of development options on airport regional airports, air services, and general annual revenues and expenditures were aviation activities. Social, commercial and assessed. Additional revenue sources were also industrial activities in the region were also considered. included. 1.2 Community Consultations 2. A field visit was conducted in coordination with stakeholder consultations. An inspection of the To gain an in-depth understanding of the issues from airport facilities was completed and background the perspective of the community and other groups information was collected. Stakeholder with interests in the airport, a comprehensive series of consultations consisted of in-person and phone consultations were conducted. A number of issues interviews with local officials, airport businesses were identified through the consultation process. and users, local industry, potential users, and Issues of general concern are identified below and community stakeholders. addressed by stakeholder group. A list of 3. Business, commercial and industrial activity was consultations conducted during the assessment reviewed. A market assessment and forecasts for process is provided in Table 1-1 general aviation activities at Wetaskiwin Airport were prepared factoring in the airport’s 1.2.1 Public Officials operational limitations and demonstrated user The opinion of public officials varied with their degree needs. of aviation knowledge and their relationship with the 4. An airport financial review was carried out with airport and airport businesses. In general, the public the assistance of City staff. Financial statements officials consulted were supportive of the airport and from 2007 to 2010 were reviewed to evaluate the understand the role that the airport plays in the airport’s financial performance, discover pertinent community and the local economy. issues, and identify changes in policy that could Officials identified some new markets, which might improve operations and reduce the expense- have potential to justify a longer runway extension. revenue gap. Many officials stressed a need to balance airport 5. The 2010 Airside Development Plan Update was improvements with other needed public infrastructure reviewed to confirm if expansion was justified, projects (e.g. an aquatic centre and industrial land and included a proposed design aircraft. The development). A runway extension was not perceived requirements of the recommended development by most to be the highest priority public project. scenarios and associated construction cost estimates were compared. 6. A competitive airports assessment identified directly competitive airports in Wetaskiwin’s vicinity and categorized their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
Business Case for Runway Extension 1-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 21 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
1.2.2 Airport Businesses and Users Those companies that make regular use of corporate aircraft currently use Edmonton International Airport Consultations with airport businesses and users due to the amenities available and short drive time. suggested that the expansion of the airport, There was no evidence suggested by local specifically the extension of the runway, would not businesses that a runway extension would lead to have a positive impact on their operations citing that increased corporate aviation traffic. they are located at the airport because it meets their operational needs. A requirement for the repair of 1.2.4 Community some airfield components (e.g. runway edge lighting, Apron II pavement failure) was noted. Community interest in and support of the airport varies. Institutions such as the RCMP and the The need for more developable land was given Wetaskiwin Hospital and Care Centre were found to priority over a runway extension by many have little need for a regional airport. Both stakeholders. Currently, all developable land is organizations make regular use of helicopters, controlled by a private entity and is being offered for especially the hospital, as Alberta Health Services sale as serviced hangar lots. Private users suggested owns and operates a helipad located on hospital that a long-term lease of a small lot or t-hangar would property. Neither institution uses the airport nor do be a more affordable option than purchasing land. they perceive any benefit from a runway extension. Concerns were raised about the possible Other Wetaskiwin-based institutions, including the implementation of airport fees. Currently, airport users Reynolds-Alberta Museum and Canada’s Aviation are not required to pay landing or parking fees and Hall of Fame, are co-located adjacent to the airport to only pay a small surcharge on aircraft fuel. Many of take advantage of the airfield facilities. The Museum the surrounding airports that are considered to be and Hall of Fame can both be accessed from the direct competitors with Wetaskiwin Regional do not airport, promoting fly-in visitors. These institutions do charge fees. Some users stated that the not operate aircraft on a regular basis and do not implementation of fees would force them to move currently have a requirement for increased runway their operations as the lack of fees in combination length. It was mentioned that extending the runway with the ability to purchase airside land were the to accommodate small business jets would be “nice to driving factors in selecting Wetaskiwin. Additionally, have” for the community, but is not a necessity at this the airport does not have arrangements in place to time. record landing and parking activities. Resources to collect fees would need to be provided. 1.2.5 Potential Airport Businesses 1.2.3 Local Businesses Prospective airport businesses were identified and consulted to evaluate the potential for relocating their Members of the local business community could not operations to Wetaskiwin Airport. demonstrate a need for airport development or runway extension. Wetaskiwin’s largest employers As Edmonton City Centre (ECC) Airport is scheduled are involved primarily in distribution, light industrial, to cease operations within the next two years, the manufacturing and fabrication activities. Because current tenants will be required to move their their products are generally large and heavy, the operations to surrounding airports. majority of shipping is achieved using road or rail A sample of approximately 50% of the current ECC transportation. Air transportation is rarely used, and tenants were targeted for survey by LPS AVIA and 16 when required it can be arranged through couriers out of 19 firms responded. Tenants were selected for and expediters at Edmonton International Airport. consultation based on the size and nature of their Regarding business travel, most local businesses operations, with focus placed on those that would typically elect to use main-line air carriers at complement Wetaskiwin’s existing airport businesses. Edmonton International Airport for domestic, trans- border and international travel.
Business Case for Runway Extension 1-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 22 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
The results of these consultations suggest that there The main issues cited by prospective businesses that is little or no interest from ECC businesses in would prevent them from moving operations to relocating to Wetaskiwin Airport. As the closure of Wetaskiwin are the distance from Edmonton and the Edmonton City Centre is imminent, many tenants small business base at Wetaskiwin Airport. It is have either preemptively relocated or already believed that employees would be reluctant to make selected an airport for relocation. Tenants that do not the long trip on a daily basis and aviation activity at require airside access are not limited to airports for the airport could not sustain a successful engine future operations and may choose to relocate to a overhaul or avionics company, for example. business or industrial park. Though several tenants have not yet ruled out Wetaskiwin as a possible home 1.2.6 Stakeholder Consultations for their business, they are favouring other competing The list of stakeholder consultations conducted during airports at the time of the survey. the assessment process is provided below.
Table 1-1 – Wetaskiwin Regional Airport - Stakeholder Consultation List Organization Name Title AC Dandy Products Hans Broere President Air Spray Ltd. Perry Dancause Director of Flight Operations Airco Aircraft Charters Ltd. Mary Anne Stanway Managing Director Alberta Aero Engine Ltd. Lance Smutt Owner Alberta Health Services Cheryl Deckert Site Manager – Wetaskiwin Regional Hospital AV8 Solutions Brent Binnie Owner Canada’s Aviation Hall of Fame Rosella Bjornson Inductee Canadian Helicopters Ltd. Simon Morton Vice President, Marketing Central Aviation Inc. John Cummings Owner Centennial Flight Centre Inc. Joe Amelia Chief Flight Instructor and Operations Manager City of Wetaskiwin Ted Gillespie City Manager City of Wetaskiwin/Wetaskiwin Air Services Ron Vanden Dungen Airport Manager/Director of Flight Operations City of Wetaskiwin Rick Wheatley Assistant Public Works Superintendent City of Wetaskiwin Al Steckler Manager of Finance City of Wetaskiwin Ron Holland Economic Development Manager City of Wetaskiwin Bill Elliot Mayor City of Wetaskiwin Joe Branco Alderman City of Wetaskiwin Dale Crabtree Alderman City of Wetaskiwin Glenn Ruecker Alderman City of Wetaskiwin Patricia MacQuarrie Alderman City of Wetaskiwin Barry Hawkes Alderman City of Wetaskiwin Mark McFaul Alderman City of Wetaskiwin Therese Myndio Assistant City Manager City of Wetaskiwin Peter Pullishy Utilities Foreman City of Wetaskiwin Lisa Novotny Development Manager/City Assessor City of Wetaskiwin Jeff Deuchar Airport User
Business Case for Runway Extension 1-3 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 23 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Table 1-1 – Wetaskiwin Regional Airport - Stakeholder Consultation List (Continued) Organization Name Title
County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Frank Coutney County Administrator Ducey Avionics Inc. RogerHolland Owner Edmonton Aero Interiors Laurence Poulet Owner Edmonton Flying Club Dean Braithwaite General Manager E-Z Air Helicopter Services Ezra Bavly Owner Foster Aircraft Maintenance Ltd. Jeff Foster Director of Maintenance Geographic Air Survey Ltd. Mrs. Hagedorn Owner Global Remote Sensing Inc. Daniel Newnham President Goulet Aircraft Supply Ltd. - - Harv Air - - Historic Aviation Services Inc. Byron Reynolds President Home Hardware Stores Limited Phil Kohlman Wetaskiwin Distribution Centre Manager Joint Economic Development Initiative Richard Horncastle Director of Economic Development KitPlane Corporation - - KMC Mining Corporation Allan Flemming President Manluk Industries Kris O'Connell Vice President Operations Novex HeliTrades Inc. Robert J. Baughman President PGA Architects Ltd. Chris Laing President RCMP Inspector Scott Tod Detachment Commander – Wetaskiwin RCMP Sgt. Grant Macdonald Operations NCO - Wetaskiwin Reynolds-Alberta Museum Noel Ratch Director Reynolds-Alberta Museum Jim Takenaka Head, Programs and Events Salzman Aviation Limited James Salzman Owner Saputo Dairy Charles Ritchie Plant Manager Solvent Buddy Frank Stacey Corporate Pilot Thomas Aircraft Maintenance Ltd. Bert Thomas President Wetaskiwin & District Chamber of Commerce Alan Greene Executive Director Wetaskiwin Air Show Society Dean Billingsly Chair Wetaskiwin Flying Club Mike Hughes President Wetaskiwin Flying Club Scott Coggan Member Wetaskiwin Flying Club Janet Coggan Member Wetaskiwin Flying Club Ed Saulou Member Wetaskiwin Flying Club Tim Babcock Member
Business Case for Runway Extension 1-4 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 24 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
2 Regional Context Review
2.1 Introduction Small airports located in surrounding communities have been reasonably successful in attracting private The business case for extending the runway must be users by offering freehold land and no airport fees. considered within the regional context where a variety Consultations indicate that Wetaskiwin has attracted of different economic activities occur and a number of private users from as far as northern Edmonton. other airports already exist to serve certain markets. Additionally, as Edmonton grows, general aviation is The City of Wetaskiwin and its relationship to the rest likely to take greater interest in surrounding airports of Alberta influences the need and structure of the with fewer restrictions and fees, and greater land most suitable airport development scenario. availability.
2.2 Population Table 2-1 – Alberta Population Change 2006-2011 % Name 2011 2006 Population growth is often a driving factor in Change increased aircraft movements at a regional airport. Calgary 1,214,839 1,079,310 12.6% There can be a positive correlation between Edmonton 1,159,869 1,034,945 12.1% population growth and enrolment in flight training Lethbridge 105,999 95,196 11.3% activities, as well as participation in private aviation activities. A larger business and population base is Red Deer 90,564 83,154 8.9% also likely to increase demand for corporate and Medicine Hat 72,807 68,822 5.8% charter aviation. Wood Buffalo 66,896 52,643 27.1% According to the 2011 Census, Wetaskiwin ranked Grande Prairie 55,032 47,107 16.8% 15th in population out of 18 Alberta census areas. Okotoks 24,511 17,150 42.9% Between 2006 and 2011, population rose from 11,689 Brooks 23,430 22,452 4.4% to 12,525. This increase represented a change of Lloydminster 18,032 15,910 13.3% 7.2%. Of the 18 agglomerations, Wetaskiwin also Camrose 17,286 15,630 10.6% th ranked 15 in growth rate. During the same period, Cold Lake 13,839 11,991 15.4% Alberta’s population increased by 10.8% while High River 12,920 10,716 20.6% Canada’s increased by 5.9%. Though Wetaskiwin grew at a greater rate than the national average, it Sylvan Lake 12,762 10,703 19.2% was below the provincial average. The greatest Wetaskiwin 12,525 11,689 7.2% increases were observed in Calgary and Edmonton. Strathmore 12,305 10,280 19.7% Alberta’s population growth is presented in Table 2-1 Canmore 12,288 12,039 2.1% The increase in Edmonton’s population may impact Lacombe 11,707 10,752 8.9% aviation activity in Wetaskiwin. The second largest Alberta 3,645,257 3,290,350 10.8% census agglomeration, the City of Edmonton, grew Canada 33,476,688 31,612,897 5.9% from 1,035,000 in 2006 to 1,160,000 in 2011 (12.1%). Source: Statistics Canada, 2011 Census Edmonton’s aviation and business community is well Growth in the local population is not anticipated served with five airports in close proximity including to require expansion of airport infrastructure. Edmonton International, Villeneuve, Cooking Lake, Edmonton City Centre, and Josephburg.
Business Case for Runway Extension 2-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 25 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
2.3 Industry Growth in light industry in Wetaskiwin is not anticipated to require expansion of the The majority of industrial activity in Central and Wetaskiwin Airport infrastructure. Northern Alberta falls into three categories: Heavy 2.3.3 Agriculture Industrial, Light Industrial, and Agricultural. Agricultural activities in Alberta are a significant 2.3.1 Heavy Industry contributor to the provincial GDP. Crops grown Heavy industry does not have a firm definition. It can include wheat, oats, barley, and canola. Livestock mean production of products that are heavy, or the focuses on beef, pork, bison, and poultry with means of production that are in themselves heavy. In approximately half of the country’s beef produced in general, heavy industry refers to construction. Alberta. Agriculture in Alberta is concentrated in Examples include the construction of large buildings southern Alberta, with only one of the five crop and chemical plants, and may include the production harvest regions located near Edmonton, and that is of construction equipment. Alternatively, heavy north of the City. industry projects can be generalized as more capital Aerial application is the most prominent use of intensive or requiring greater resources, facilities, or aviation in the agricultural industry. Pesticides, management. herbicides, and other applications can be applied at a In Alberta, heavy industry typically refers to industries much higher rate than ground application and at lower active in or supporting the extraction, processing and cost. Aerial application occurs throughout Alberta and transporting of oil and natural gas. Though these Western Canada but is predominantly to be found activities occur throughout the province, they are close to strong aerial application markets. increasingly concentrated in northerly areas and Growth in agriculture is not anticipated to require supported by operations located on the north side of expansion of Wetaskiwin Airport infrastructure. Edmonton. Heavy industry in Alberta utilizes aviation primarily for the transportation of workers and time- 2.3.4 Wetaskiwin Industry sensitive goods with the majority of these flight operations originating in Edmonton and Calgary. Industry in the City and County of Wetaskiwin is a combination of light industrial activities and Growth in heavy industry is not anticipated to agriculture. Light industry consists primarily of require expansion of Wetaskiwin Airport manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution. Three infrastructure. Wetaskiwin based companies are involved in product design and manufacturing. A.C. Dandy produces 2.3.2 Light Industry electrical enclosures and power systems; Manluk Light industry is usually less capital and labour- Corporation manufactures petrochemical and mining intensive than heavy industry, and is more consumer- products; and Supreme International fabricates oriented. Light industry products are typically mobile feed processors for the agricultural industry. produced for end-users. These companies were found not to use Wetaskiwin Airport regularly. Light industrial activities in Alberta cover a wide range of products and activities including, but not limited to, The largest operator of warehousing and distribution manufacturing, fabrication, warehousing, and facilities is Home Hardware’s Western Distribution distribution. There is a focus on products utilized by Centre. The largest employer in Wetaskiwin, the both the oil and gas and agricultural industries. Distribution Centre supports all Home Hardware Alberta’s light industry utilizes aviation primarily for stores in Western Canada and uses both road and the transportation of corporate executives and small, rail transportation. Wetaskiwin Airport is not a high value products. Centres of light industry are component of Home Hardware’s logistics planning. located widely across the province and are often Company executives and personnel travel on located near existing transportation systems. scheduled airlines from Edmonton International Airport rather than using corporate aircraft.
Business Case for Runway Extension 2-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 26 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
The largest industry in the County of Wetaskiwin is Edmonton International agriculture, including crop and livestock operations. Edmonton International Airport is the principal air Wetaskiwin Aerial Applicators supports these passenger airport in the greater Edmonton region. It operations from its’ base at the airport. is the largest airport in Canada by land area and It is not anticipated that the growth in local covers approximately 2,800 hectares. The catchment industries will require an expansion to the area for the airport includes the City of Edmonton, Wetaskiwin Airport infrastructure. Leduc, Parkland, Strathcona, Sturgeon, and Wetaskiwin Counties. 2.4 Regional Airports According to the 2010 Master Plan, 86% of the airport’s passenger traffic originates in or is destined Central Alberta’s aviation needs are served through a for the City of Edmonton. Flights to and from network of small and regional general aviation Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Houston, and Chicago airports, and by a large international airport with constitute a significant share of the airport’s origin and scheduled air services. General Aviation (GA) refers, destination traffic. The most popular connecting broadly speaking, to most aviation activity which is routes from Edmonton International are services to not carried out by scheduled or large charter airlines. Grande Prairie, Fort McMurray, and Yellowknife. The Edmonton region is served by multiple airports Beyond passenger traffic, Edmonton International is that meet the aviation needs of over one million positioning to attract large General Aviation activities people. The largest airport operator in central Alberta centred on the energy and resource sectors. The and greatest competitor to Wetaskiwin is the development of a new business aviation area north of Edmonton Regional Airports Authority. The four Runway 02-20 in the future will accommodate airports run by the Edmonton Regional Airports scheduled charters, corporate charter services, and Authority (ERAA) include Villeneuve, City Centre, fixed-base operators (FBOs). A large tract of land has Cooking Lake, and Edmonton International. The first been designated at the north-west corner of the three are General Aviation airports with Edmonton airport to accommodate major growth in general International providing the major origin and aviation activity as illustrated in Figure 2-2. destination point for scheduled domestic and international passengers and cargo. The specific role With rising airport fees at Edmonton International, of each airport operated by Edmonton Airports is some small GA activities may be drawn to smaller presented in Table 2-2. airports but these will gravitate towards Edmonton and to related GA airports operated by the EAA. Table 2-2 – Edmonton Airports Growth in operations at Edmonton International Airport Role Airport is not anticipated to require expansion of Wetaskiwin Airport infrastructure. Large GA Commercial Edmonton International Operations Medium GA Commercial Edmonton City Centre (Premium) Operations Small GA Commercial Villeneuve Airport (including Flying Training) Cooking Lake Airport Recreational (Low Cost)
Business Case for Runway Extension 2-3 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 27 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Figure 2-1 – Edmonton Region Industrial Activity
Heavy Industrial
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
Agricultural
Figure 2-2 – Future General Aviation Development Area – Edmonton International Airport
Business Case for Runway Extension 2-4 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 28 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Edmonton City Centre The airport is connected to Highway No. 633 by an access road and has a paved car parking area. There Edmonton City Centre Airport is located within the are 8 tenant apron areas in use at the airport each boundary of the City of Edmonton and approximately with access to the taxiway system. There is significant 1 km north of the downtown core. The airport is land available for additional hangar development. located within a densely populated industrial area of the City. The airport currently has two runways, the It is anticipated that Villeneuve Airport will absorb the longest being approximately 5,900 feet in length. majority of small GA activity from the closure of City Although unconstrained by topographical features, Centre Airport, but may be limited by existing the airport is physically constrained by the infrastructure. Introduction of an Instrument Landing Yellowhead Trail freeway to the north, the 121st System (ILS) is currently contemplated. Street arterial to the west, Kingsway arterial to the Cooking Lake southwest, Princess Elizabeth Avenue to the southeast and by commercial areas served from the Cooking Lake Airport is located on Cooking Lake, 107th Street arterial to the east. southeast of the City of Edmonton. The airport serves private and recreational fixed wing and rotary wing In 2009, Edmonton City Council voted in favour of operators, provides fixed wing general aircraft phased closure of the airport. The community expects maintenance services, and serves as a base float that the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology will plane and recreational flying training. obtain the land occupied by the eastern side of the airport. The remainder of the airport will be zoned for The airport occupies 151 hectares and has a unique mixed-use residential and commercial development capability as a water base and land base airport. The 2,950 ft. runway is constrained at the southeast end Progressive closure of the City Centre Airport will by the lake and the floatplane base. The northwest displace many General Aviation activities, some of end of the runway is constrained from expansion by which will be transferred to the International Airport Township Road 514 and the airport boundary. and other GA airports in the region. The airport has a single public apron and many small Closure of Edmonton City Centre airport is not aprons contained among the 68 hangar lots. There anticipated to require expansion of Wetaskiwin are 75 aircraft tie-down spaces with room for Airport infrastructure. expansion. The floatplane base has space for 20 floating docks and two ramp areas. Villeneuve Hangar lots are available for sale, though some Villeneuve Airport is located north-west of the City of tenants elect to lease. Cooking Lake is positioned to Edmonton. It is surrounded by agricultural lands and accommodate recreational flying activities and is gravel pits. Villeneuve Airport has two runways (16- unlikely to attract many new businesses or users as a 34 and 08-26) both 3,500 ft. long by 100 ft. wide. The result of the closure of City Centre. runways have a weight restriction, which limits the type of aircraft that can use the airport. The airport has two taxiways that provide access to both ends of each runway and the hanger area.
Business Case for Runway Extension 2-5 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 29 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 30 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
3 Market Assessment and Forecasting
3.1 Market Assessment The proximity to Edmonton International provides the residents of Wetaskiwin with access to numerous Air transportation is categorized by market segment. lower cost air carriers and destinations, within a short Market segments relevant to Wetaskiwin were drive (approximately 40 minutes). There is no reviewed to determine potential demand for an sustainable market for scheduled passenger air increased runway length at the airport. services at Wetaskiwin Airport.
3.1.1 Scheduled Passenger Services 3.1.2 Charter Passenger Services The introduction of scheduled passenger services at Existing charter operators, including Central Aviation, Wetaskiwin Airport is highly unlikely. Wetaskiwin is a Solvent Buddy, and Wetaskiwin Air Services, small community with low sustainable daily demand currently meet the small-scale demand for charter for air travel. A local air carrier could only operate flights. A review of Wetaskiwin’s charter market small aircraft and would need to charge very high suggests that it is too small to sustain larger-scale fares to support regular operations. Even using small operations. Passenger charters to southern commuter aircraft such as the Beech 1900D, it is destinations could not be sustained given the choice highly unlikely that a single service to one or two of destinations, prices, and schedules offered by points would attract local passengers away from carriers at Edmonton International. Currently, energy Edmonton International with its wide array of carriers, companies consolidate passengers at Calgary and destinations, flight frequencies and lower airfares. Edmonton for transportation to their operations in Small commuter aircraft have very high operating northern Alberta. These flights operate larger jet and costs per seat-kilometre. Figure 3-1 shows rankings turboprop aircraft transporting high passenger of operating cost by aircraft, with aircraft arranged by volumes daily. The proximity of Edmonton increasing seat capacity. International eliminates the likelihood of these operations commencing at Wetaskiwin Airport. There is no sustainable market for large charter air services at Wetaskiwin Airport.
Figure 3-1 – Aircraft Operating Costs per Available Seat-Kilometre
$0.16
$0.14
$0.12
$0.10
$0.08
$0.06
$0.04
$0.02
$0.00
A-318 A319 A321 ATR-72 CRJ 900EMB 190 MD 80/90 A330-200 SAAB 340/BEmbraer-135 EMB140/145 BO M/EMB 70 A320-100/200 Boeing Boeing717-200 737-500 Boeing 737-300 Boeing Boeing737-800 Boeing737-900 757-200Boeing 767-200Boeing 757-300 Boeing 747-400 DHC8-100CRJ-100/RJ-100ER DASH-8 DHC8-400 DASH-8 Boeing 767-300/400 Boeing 737-700/700LR
Boeing 777-200/200LR/233L Fuel & Oil Maintenance Flight Operations Source: United States Department of Transportation Form 41, Schedule P52. Year Ending November 30, 2010
Business Case for Runway Extension 3-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 31 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
3.1.3 Air Cargo 3.1.4 Aviation Maintenance and Support Air cargo operations include three categories: Aviation maintenance and support may involve activities including, but not limited to: air courier; airfreight; and Engine repair and overhaul; airmail. Airframe inspections and parts supply; Air courier operations involve the transportation of Avionics repair; time sensitive goods, usually small in nature, at a Structural modifications and installations; higher unit rate. The low cost of ground transportation Fuel sales; and combined with the proximity of Edmonton and Calgary International Airports reduces the likelihood Aircraft storage. of air courier operations succeeding at Wetaskiwin Aviation maintenance and support services currently Airport. located at Wetaskiwin have sufficient capacity to Airfreight typically involves the transportation of large service the aircraft fleet mix and size based at the or bulk items consolidated by a freight forwarder and airport. Demand for these services is directly related shipped once large volumes have been amassed. to the volume of traffic and number of aircraft based Airfreight is less expensive, but less expedient than at the airport. Because forecasted demand growth is air courier. These operations connect points of origin expected to be relatively modest, an increase in these of air freight with points of destination. Wetaskiwin services is not anticipated in the short-term. industries were found to ship by road and rail with no In addition, should demand for maintenance services demand for airfreight operations. grow faster than forecasted, there is no shortage of Airmail is commonly transported between population aircraft maintenance operations at other area airports. centres by road or by air. If moved by air, it travels either as belly cargo on commercial flights, or on There is no measurable demand for additional dedicated DC-10 and B727 freighter aircraft operated infrastructure to support aviation maintenance by Kelowna Flightcraft. It is then transported by road activities at Wetaskiwin Airport. to a final destination. Wetaskiwin is a small population centre, not served by scheduled passenger flights, 3.1.5 Government and Health Services limiting the possibility of participation in airmail Based on consultations with RCMP’s Wetaskiwin operations. Large airmail operations are handled detachment, there is no known need for air access to through Edmonton or Calgary International Airports. Wetaskiwin. The majority of the RCMP’s Alberta There is no sustainable market for air cargo aviation operations are conducted with helicopters, services at Wetaskiwin Airport. which do not require an extended runway. Similarly, Alberta Health Services does not have a need for the airport. Since the introduction of the Shock Trauma Air Rescue Society (STARS) in 1985, the hospital air ambulance function has moved primarily to helicopter operations. Consultations suggest that fixed wing ambulance operations, those requiring a runway, are not a significant time saver over road ambulance transportation to Edmonton hospitals. The Government of Alberta has, in the past, utilized
Wetaskiwin Airport for VIP transportation purposes Edmonton International hosts many large air cargo operators using DHC 8-200 aircraft. Some problems were as well as dedicated air courier facilities such as FEDEX. encountered with the existing infrastructure.
Business Case for Runway Extension 3-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 32 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
However, extending the runway for safer use by The three forecast scenarios were derived from government VIP travellers could not be justified. forecasted Alberta population growth, forecasted North American General Aviation growth, and There is no demand for additional infrastructure forecasted Alberta GDP, respectively. to support government or health services activities at Wetaskiwin Airport. The level of GA activity at an airport is often closely correlated with the population of the catchment area 3.2 Traffic Forecasts as well as the economic performance of the region. All three forecasts assume the continuation and Long-term traffic forecasts for the Wetaskiwin Airport progressive growth of existing airport activities by through to 2031 have been prepared and are based airport businesses and private users. upon: 3.2.2 Historical Traffic Alberta’s forecasted population growth; The Wetaskiwin Airport has witnessed a pronounced North American general aviation activity; and and constant decrease in aircraft movements since Alberta’s Gross Domestic Product 2005. This has been attributed to both an overall decline in recreational flying and recent global The preferred development option will depend on economic turmoil. The average percent change in future activity levels. Future traffic volumes will traffic between 2000 and 2010 was -1.94%. Since determine the types of aircraft using the airport, and 2005, the average change has been -8.89% annually. the appropriate development path. The forecasts will The peak in aviation activity was witnessed in 2005 help the City to determine required infrastructure with 23,100 movements. The recorded low occurred improvements and appropriate phasing. in 2010 with 14,500 movements. 3.2.1 Assumptions and Methodology The availability of accurate movement data is integral to the production of traffic forecasts. Physical records The forecasting approach recognizes the critical role were obtained for the years 2001 to 2003. Though the of general aviation in determining future traffic at the City did maintain accurate records until 2007, airport. For the purpose of this analysis, airport technical difficulties prevent access to this activity was measured by aircraft movements. An information. The former Airport Manager provided aircraft movement can be any of the following estimated movement numbers for these years. The operations: a take-off, landing, touch-and-go, or an movements for 2010 were provided by the current overshoot. Airport Manager, though the recording system has proven to be unreliable in recent years. The values for Historical movements for Wetaskiwin Airport were 2008 and 2009 were interpolated. obtained from airport records and consultations with current and former airport management. Movements Ideally, aircraft movements would be recorded on an for the years that lacked records were determined by annual basis using a reliable system and made interpolating between two known years. Historical available for analysis. movements obtained spanned 2001 to 2010. The historical movements were then used as a base for 3.2.3 Traffic Growth Forecasts the development of low, medium, and high-growth Three growth scenarios, low, medium, and high were scenarios. forecasted to determine the requirement for future Based on consultations and market analysis, the infrastructure improvements. These scenarios forecasts assume that any improvements made to integrate forecasted Alberta population growth, airport infrastructure, specifically the extension of the forecasted North American GA growth, and runway, will not significantly impact future aircraft forecasted Alberta GDP respectively. movements. Airport activities are generally driven by external factors such as local population, the regional economy, and the aviation industry itself.
Business Case for Runway Extension 3-3 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 33 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Low Growth High Growth The low growth scenario considers the impact on The high-growth scenario evaluates the result of aircraft movements if aviation activities at the airport Wetaskiwin traffic growing at the same rate at grew in line with Alberta’s population. Alberta’s GDP. The Alberta Vision 2020 report presents a number of GDP growth scenarios. The The Government of Alberta’s Department of Finance medium population growth scenario suggests that the forecasted in the Alberta Population Projections 2011- period beginning 2010 and ending 2026 will achieve 2050 that population will grow on average 1.58% an annual average growth rate of 3.62%. When annually between 2011 and 2031. When applied to applied, aircraft movements would increase from aircraft movements, they would increase from 14,500 14,500 in 2010 to 30,611 in 2031. in 2010 to 19,560 in 2031. Although it is expected that Wetaskiwin’s economy Medium Growth will respond to factors affecting the whole Province, it The impact of forecasted growth in North American may be overly optimistic to anticipate an increase in GA on movements was considered in the medium aircraft movements in step with the growth of growth scenario. The Federal Aviation Administration Alberta’s economy. (FAA), Transport Canada (TC), Bombardier, and The three traffic growth scenarios are depicted in Boeing have prepared projections of the GA Figure 3-1. The detailed traffic forecasts are industry’s performance in Canada and the United presented in Appendix B. States. When the growth rates identified by these four sources are averaged, an annual growth rate of There is no justification for significant additional 2.28% results for the period including 2010-2030. infrastructure to meet forecasted levels of traffic When applied to aircraft movements, they would growth at Wetaskiwin Airport. increase from 14,500 in 2010 to 23,416 in 2031.
For the medium-growth scenario a growth index from a number of very reliable sources in the aviation industry was utilized and presents a realistic middle ground between the high and low scenarios. The medium scenario was utilized for all planning in the Business Case. Figure 3-1 – Wetaskiwin Forecasted Aircraft Movements
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
Annual Aircraft Movements 10,000
5,000
-
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Historical Low Medium High
Business Case for Runway Extension 3-4 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 34 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
4 Airport Financial Review
4.1 Budget Sustainability If property taxes were no longer allocated as airport revenue the primary source of airport revenue would A major factor in determining the long-term viability of then be the fuel surcharge that is applied to AvGas. an airport is budget sustainability, the ability of the Central Aviation currently provides fuel services at airport to effectively manage its expenses relative to Wetaskiwin. The City applies a modest surcharge its revenues. An understanding of line items in the ($0.03-$0.05) per litre. If property taxes are removed Wetaskiwin Airport financial statements was achieved and the fuel surcharge is the only source of revenue, through consultation with City officials. the airport would experience a revenue decrease of 92%, from $60,927 to $4,772. Review of the last four years of operations suggests that the Airport is not financially sustainable, at least Given the current fee structure, if aircraft movements from an operational perspective. Wetaskiwin Airport’s did increase as forecasted, operational revenue consolidated financial statements for the years 2007 would only increase marginally, if at all. through 2010 are provided in Appendix C. Regardless of the airport’s ability to manage expenditures, revenues are not enough to approach 4.1.1 Revenues sustaining daily operations, let alone capital A significant and measurable benefit that would result improvements. Additional sources of revenue from the development of airport infrastructure is an generation that may be appropriate for Wetaskiwin increase in airport revenues, specifically the airport’s are discussed in Chapter 8. direct revenues. 4.1.2 Expenditures Typical of regional airports, direct revenues are those that are generated from landing and parking fees, fuel During the same period, 2007-2010, expenditures surcharges, and leases. However, Wetaskiwin does grew from $161,399 to $228,111, which is an not charge landing fees, parking fees, nor does it increase of approximately 41%. Major drivers of these collect lease revenue. Unlike direct revenues, indirect expenditures have included contracted services, revenues such as gains from the sale of assets are utilities costs, and amortization. not related to the traffic volumes experienced at the Amortization is considered to be an indirect expense. airport. In the last four years of operations, revenues Indirect expenses are those that are not related to the have grown from $44,413 in 2007 to $60,927 in 2010, operations of the airport. The inclusion of amortization an increase of 37%. in a budget is a common accounting practice, but it The primary source of increased revenues is may affect how financial performance is perceived. associated with property taxes collected from airport According to financial statements, the airport has had landowners. Discussions with City officials suggest significantly greater expenditures than revenues over that beyond 2010, municipal taxes collected from the past four years. However, the 41% increase in properties located at the airport will no longer expenditures over the four years is partly the result of contribute to airport revenue. This decision was made the introduction of an annual amortization payment in because municipal taxes collected from airport 2009. The addition of this payment increased the properties do not contribute to the maintenance and 2009 expenditures from $119,156 to $223,021, a operation of the airport. Like all property taxes difference of 87%. collected in the City, those collected from airport properties go towards snow clearing of public roads, fire protection, and police services.
Business Case for Runway Extension 4-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 35 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Unlike revenues, it is difficult to relate airport The gap in Wetaskiwin’s revenues and expenditures expenditures directly to aircraft movements. The is significantly greater than those of most regional conclusion can be drawn from a variety of airports in Canada. It is evident that the City should observations that airport management has had take steps to reduce the gap and move the airport difficulty controlling expenditures relative to revenues. towards financial sustainability. The impact of Over the past four years, expenditures have grown at property tax and amortization on revenue and a greater rate than revenue. expenditures and the resulting gap for 2007-2010 is demonstrated in Table 4-1. The airport is not in a favorable financial position. It is not uncommon for regional airports to have a Figure 4-1 illustrates the impact of omitting property significant revenue/expenditure gap. However, if only taxes and amortization from the 2010 financial direct operational revenues and expenditures are statement. taken into account, in 2010 the airport’s operating
revenues are approximately 4% of expenditures.
Table 4-1 – Actual Revenue /Operating Revenue Comparison 2007-2010 Items 2007 2008 2009 2010 Actual Revenue $44,413 $51,720 $54,659 $60,927 Actual Expenses $161,400 $118,961 $223,021 $228,112 Revenue Less Property Tax $4,020 $4,557 $7,450 $4,772 Expenses Less Amortization $161,400 $118,961 $119,156 $112,953 Revenue-Expense Gap $157,379 $114,404 $111,706 $108,181
Figure 4-1 – 2010 Actual Revenue / Operating Revenue Comparison
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$- Revenue Expenses Revenue Less Property Tax Expenses Less Amortization
Business Case for Runway Extension 4-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 36 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
5 Development Plan Review
In 2010, an update to the 2004 Development Concept Justification for development appears to have rested Plan was completed by EBA Engineering Consultants upon establishing the ability of the airport to Ltd. for the City of Wetaskiwin. It identified a number accommodate operations by larger and higher of airfield improvement and development options with performance aircraft. No evidence was found during associated capital cost estimates. LPS AVIA’s review that specific local market-related research or updated traffic forecasts had been A review of this update was undertaken to: included in the scope of the 2010 Update. 1. Confirm proposed expansion justification; 5.1.3 Development Plan 2. Identify a design aircraft consistent with the market assessment and forecasts; The 2010 Update recommends several developments that would allow for higher performance aircraft to 3. Confirm airport performance and operational utilize the airport (i.e. corporate jet aircraft). The requirements of design aircraft; and report references the Socio-Economic Opportunity 4. Compare requirements to development scenarios Assessment (2006) prepared by EBA as justification and construction cost estimates. for airport improvements, citing that the airport provides direct and indirect economic benefits to the 5.1 2010 Airport Development community and the benefits would increase if larger aircraft could be accommodated. The Opportunity Plan Update Assessment addresses the City’s ability to purchase lands surrounding the airport. 5.1.1 Purpose The 2010 Update states that a runway extension to The purpose of The 2010 Updated Development Plan 5,000 ft (1,524 m) or more would require a code was to guide development of the airport’s airside number change from Code 2 to Code 3. With this property and determine the infrastructure increased runway length, the type of aircraft that improvements required to accommodate future airport could use the facility would expand from a Code B to uses. The plan provided a layout for the runway and Code C aircraft, Code C aircraft having wingspans of taxiway development scenarios. 79 ft between 118 ft. The 2010 Update references the Bombardier CRJ and Challenger 601 as 5.1.2 Studies Referenced representative Code C aircraft. A Bombardier CRJ is EBA referenced a series of studies previously a 50-seat regional jet most commonly used by airlines completed for the Airport. These studies covered to serve small market communities, while a various topics including engineering, marketing, and Challenger 601, is a large business jet typically demographics. The studies included, but were not carrying 10-12 passengers with a maximum range of limited to, the following: over 6,200 km (i.e. Wetaskiwin to the U.K.). To support these aircraft, airside-maneuvering surfaces 1995 Feasibility Study (Daltam Engineering) would need to be extended and widened from Code 1997 Development and Marketing Plan (WRAA) 2B to Code 3C. 2002 Capital Works Plan (EBA) The 2010 Update notes that the airfield pavement surfaces have a Pavement Load Rating (PLR) 5 and 2002 Pavement Investigation (EXH Engineering) typical Code C aircraft would demand a PLR 7. 2004 Development Concept Plan (EBA) 2006 Socio-Economic Opportunity Assessment (EBA)
Business Case for Runway Extension 5-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 37 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
The authors considered both airport and aircraft The Update plan emphasized that any future performance characteristics when developing airport development of the airport would be event-driven and expansion options. Airport characteristics included would likely include: altitude temperature, runway gradient, runway The condition of the runway pavement; pavement surface condition, wind conditions, and weather conditions. Aircraft characteristics included The value of the airport to the municipal and passenger capacity, cargo capacity, aircraft range, regional economies; and and destinations. The 2010 Update did not appear to factor market demand into the analysis of The opportunity for funding assistance. requirements stating that they had not yet been Because of the high cost of completing portions of the projected. airport development as separate construction The Development Plan concludes that the City of projects, the 2010 Update recommended that major Wetaskiwin should conduct a survey of their target improvements be undertaken concurrently. markets to determine potential future user requirements and that runway length, strength, and 5.2 Development Plan Review cost will be dependant upon the selected design aircraft. The Airport Development Plan Update recommended a number of improvements to infrastructure at a 5.1.4 Development Options significant cost to the City of Wetaskiwin. The 2010 Update provides two options for the future 5.2.1 Extension Justification development of the airport. There is little justification given for extending the Option 1 runway or performing other airside improvements. The following elements were included in Option 1: The 2010 Update references the 2006 Socio- Economic Opportunity Assessment, which concludes Strengthen the existing runway, Taxiways A and that an increase in airside capacity will have a direct B, and Apron I to PLR 7 benefit to the region’s economy. However, the Extend the runway to 5,000 ft (1,524 m), Opportunity Assessment includes activities such as Medevac operations as benefits generated by the Construct a full-length parallel taxiway airport. Medevac operations are no longer conducted Expand Apron I and Taxiways A an B to Code C at the airport. This change suggests that the requirements economic benefit currently generated is less than estimated in 2006. The 2006 report does not quantify Option 2 the potential benefits associated with airport The second option is an alteration to Option 1, improvements and some identified potential benefit extending the runway to 5,500 to accommodate larger opportunities are not viable (e.g. air cargo, oil sands or higher performance aircraft. worker transportation). The 2010 Update places the responsibility for 5.1.5 Phasing determining future demand and user requirements on The 2010 Update recommends phasing development the City. of the airport based on three factors. The first factor was the costs associated with upgrading the airport infrastructure. The second was the need for improved airport infrastructure to increase the economic benefit to the community. The third factor was the need to repair or replace infrastructure as it deteriorates.
Business Case for Runway Extension 5-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 38 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
5.2.2 Design Aircraft Aircraft that would require pavement strengthening are unlikely to use the airport within the forecasted The 2010 Update does not select a specific design period. A PLR 5 allows for the operation of a variety aircraft to determine future infrastructure of aircraft including small turboprop, commuter, and requirements. The design aircraft is usually the corporate aircraft. Table 5-1 lists potential design largest or most demanding aircraft currently operating aircraft from the 2010 Update, with associated PLR at an airport, or the largest most demanding aircraft values. foreseen to operate in the future. Instead a selection of potential design aircraft was compiled, a range of Table 5-1 – PLR Requirement by Aircraft Type aircraft types and sizes were analyzed including small turboprop aircraft, specialty firefighting aircraft, and Aircraft Type PLR Requirement 50-seat regional jets. For the majority of infrastructure Field Length > 4,000 ft (1,220m) < 5,000 ft (1,525m) planning, including taxiway width and pavement DHC8-100/200 4.7 strength, the Bombardier CRJ 200ER and Bombardier Challenger 601 were referenced. CL-415 Water Bomber 5.7 Beechcraft King Air 200 2.4 Based on the 2012 market assessment it is not anticipated that either of these aircraft will make Field Length > 5,000 ft (1,525m) < 5,500 ft (1,678m) regular use the airport within the forecasted period. A Fairchild Dornier 328-110 4.3 small, twin-engine, turboprop aircraft (i.e. Beechcraft Cessna Citation Encore 3.3 King Air 200) would appear to be a more appropriate Cessna Citation XLS 5.6 selection. Consultations suggest that this aircraft will be in use at Wetaskiwin in the short term and likely DHC8-300 4.8 will continue in use at least into the medium term. Beech 1900D 2.9 Field Length > 7,000 ft (2,135m) 5.2.3 Aerodrome Reference Code Bombardier CRJ 200ER 6.8 The airport is currently certified as a Code 2B-NI Bombardier Challenger 601 6.3 facility. The 2010 Update recommends that the airport Source: Transport Canada Technical Programs – Aircraft Load be upgraded to Code 3C-NI (non-instrument) in the Ratings long-term. However, consultations revealed that two GPS approaches are currently being developed by The 2010 Development Plan Update recommends NAV CANADA for Wetaskiwin, suggesting that the construction of a full-length parallel taxiway to airport will support non-precision (NP) operations increase runway capacity and to provide access to within the next few years. development areas to the northeast and southwest of the core development area. 5.3.4 Infrastructure Requirement Based on forecasted aircraft movements, a parallel The options include a number of construction projects taxiway will not be required to maintain runway that exceed the apparent future requirements of capacity and availability. airport users. These projects include pavement strengthening, taxiway widening, and the installation The two development areas potentially served by new of a full-length parallel taxiway. taxiways are privately owned and responsibility for developing new access routes might be expected to The 2010 Update notes that airside pavements have lie with the owner. a PLR of 5 and recommends strengthening the runway, taxiways, and public apron to PLR 7. Review There is little direct financial benefit to the Airport for of the potential design aircraft in the 2010 Update the cost of new taxiway construction to these areas. reveals that for the majority of aircraft capable of Additionally, the 2010 Update does not include cost operating on a 5,000 ft or 5,500 ft runway, pavement estimates associated with existing infrastructure strengthening may not be a requirement. deficiencies (i.e. Apron II pavement failure).
Business Case for Runway Extension 5-3 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 39 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 40 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
6 Competitive Airports Assessment
6.1 Competitive Airport Selection Table 6-1 – Wetaskiwin Airport Characteristics Wetaskiwin Regional The performance and competitive advantages of the Operator City of Wetaskiwin Wetaskiwin Airport can be compared with competing Category Certified airports in the region. A list of Alberta airports was Runway 3,888 x 100 ft. asphalt compiled that have common or overlapping Navigational Aids NDB, DME catchment areas with Wetaskiwin. The list includes: Scheduled Service No Edmonton International; Best Approach RNAV Villeneuve; Customs No CANPASS No Edmonton City Centre; Commercial Land Freehold Cooking Lake; Fuel 100LL Josephburg (Warren Thomas); Fees No Vegreville; Distance to Edmonton (Road) 70 km Camrose; Strengths Ponoka Industrial; and Land is available on a freehold basis, giving Lacombe owners the ability to build equity and obtain financing from lending institutions From this list, five airports were selected based on their competitive relationships. An understanding of The airport does not collect landing or parking these relationships in conjunction with forecasted GA fees and applies a modest fuel surcharge activity in the region is critical in determining future development requirements. The maintenance of the airport’s certification ensures operational safety and may attract potential users 6.2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport Airport infrastructure is in generally good Wetaskiwin Regional Airport is a small regional airport condition with competent management serving private users and the General Aviation The current airport businesses are well-operated industry. Airport businesses include flight training, and have a vested interest in the long-term charter operations, aerial application, aircraft success of the Airport restoration, and aerial photography. Located within Wetaskiwin City limits, the airport is a certified facility Weaknesses supporting piston and small turboprop aircraft. All developable land is privately held and will be Neighbouring the Reynolds-Alberta Museum and sold, with no long-term leases available Canada’s Aviation Hall of Fame, the airport is well The airport has poor financial performance, with positioned to attract fly-in tourism. little revenue and growing expenditures Table 6-1 outlines the physical and competitive Historically, the Airport has not been well characteristics of Wetaskiwin Airport. marketed with little knowledge of the airport outside of Central Alberta
Business Case for Runway Extension 6-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 41 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Opportunities 6.3.2 Cooking Lake With the closure of Edmonton City Centre Airport, Cooking Lake Airport is the only facility in Alberta with it may be possible to attract new businesses that both a floatplane base and a conventional runway. It's complement the existing airport operations also the only airport in Canada with a condominium ownership structure. Located 20 km east of Threats Edmonton in Strathcona County, Cooking Lake The majority of airports in direct competition with Airport is primarily a recreational flying facility for Wetaskiwin are better located to serve floatplanes and small aircraft. The airport offers Edmonton’s private users and businesses services including flight training, charter service, aircraft maintenance and repair, and card lock fuel. The decline in General Aviation, specifically private flying, and the global economic crisis Cooking Lake is unique in offering bare-land could reduce the need for many regional airports condominium lots. When Edmonton Airports like Wetaskiwin purchased the airport in 1995, the Cooking Lake Condominium Association was created to manage the condo development. All available lots were sold and 6.3 Competitive Airports most have been developed. 6.3.1 Camrose Table 6-3 – Cooking Lake Airport Characteristics Camrose, like Wetaskiwin is a small, certified airport Cooking Lake Airport serving airport businesses and recreational flyers. Operator Edmonton Regional Though the airport experiences less traffic, it Category Registered maintains extensive airside facilities including a 4,500 Runway 2,952 x 75 ft. asphalt ft runway served by a full parallel taxiway. These Navigational Aids No facilities were improved in 1993, but the airport has Best Approach No approach published not experienced a marked increase in traffic as a result. The airport is owned and operated by the City Scheduled Service No of Camrose. It offers services for private pilots, Customs No visiting aircraft, flight training, rental aircraft, Medevac, CANPASS No helicopters, and corporate aircraft servicing the needs Commercial Land Leasehold/Freehold of local companies. Developable land is available for Fuel 100LL, JB (D) long-term lease. Like Wetaskiwin, the airport does not Fees No charge user fees. Distance to Edmonton (Road) 37 km Table 6-2 – Camrose Airport Characteristics Camrose Airport 6.3.3 Edmonton International Operator City of Camrose Edmonton International is the primary air passenger Category Certified and air cargo facility in the Edmonton region. It is a Runway 4,512 x 100 ft. asphalt hub facility for Northern Alberta and Northern Canada Navigational Aids NDB, DME providing regularly scheduled flights to over fifty Best Approach RNAV communities in Canada, the United States, Central Scheduled Service No America, and Europe. It is one of Canada's largest Customs No airports by total land area, 5th busiest airport by CANPASS No passenger traffic (2011), and the 13th busiest by aircraft movements (2010). The airport is operated by Commercial Land Leasehold Edmonton Regional Airport Authority and is located Fuel A100LL 26 km south of Edmonton. It served over 6.2 million Fees No passengers in 2011. Distance to Edmonton (Road) 96 km
Business Case for Runway Extension 6-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 42 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Land is available for development on a long-term Table 6-5 – Josephburg Airport Characteristics lease basis. However, land cannot be sold, as the Josephburg (Warren Thomas) Airport Federal Government owns the airport lands. Landing Operator Strathcona County and parking fees have risen progressively in recent Category Registered years, which have resulted in the reduction of small GA activities, particularly recreational operations. Runway(s) 4,560 x 100 ft. asphalt Navigational Aids No Table 6-4 – Edmonton International Airport Best Approach RNAV Characteristics Scheduled Service No Edmonton International Airport Customs No Operator Edmonton Regional CANPASS No Category Certified Commercial Land Leasehold 10,995 x 200 ft. asphalt Runways Fuel 100LL JA, HPR, FSII 10,200 x 200 ft. asphalt Fees Parking, Tie down Navigational Aids NDB, VOR/DME, ILS Distance to Edmonton (Road) 50 km Best Approach ILS
Scheduled Service Yes Customs Yes 6.3.5 Ponoka Industrial CANPASS Yes The Ponoka Industrial Airport is located just south of Commercial Land Leasehold Ponoka on Highway 2A, approximately 105km from Fuel 100LL, JA-1 Edmonton. It is served by a newly implemented GPS Fees Landing, Terminal, approach. There are 3 aircraft maintenance facilities Distance to Edmonton (Road) 28P km ki as well as fuel and maintenance services. No fees are collected and leasehold land is available. 6.3.4 Josephburg CANPASS is a competitive advantage of Ponoka Industrial Airport. It allows aircraft to quickly clear The Warren Thomas (Josephburg) Airport is located customs in Ponoka, rather than having to enter the 1.6 kilometres north of Josephburg, and is country through Calgary or Edmonton. approximately 50 kilometres east of metropolitan Edmonton. It is managed by Strathcona County and Table 6-6 – Ponoka Industrial Airport used for privately owned and commercial aircraft. The Characteristics airport supports piston, turboprop and jet operations Ponoka Industrial Airport through the sale of 100LL and Jet A fuel and Operator Town of Ponoka providing amenities including Precision Approach Category Registered Pathway Indicators (PAPIs), an Omni Directional Runway 3,089 x 75 ft. asphalt Lighting System (ODALS), an Automated Weather Navigational Aids NDB Observation System (AWOS), and a procedural GPS approach. Best Approach NDB Scheduled Service No Developable land is available for private and Customs No commercial lease. The airport collects parking and tie down fees. CANPASS Yes Commercial Land Leasehold Fuel 100LL Fees No Distance to Edmonton (Road) 105 km
Business Case for Runway Extension 6-3 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 43 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
6.4 Competitive Analysis 6.4.2 Weaknesses High Fees – Many airports competing with The comparative strengths, weaknesses, Wetaskiwin, particularly those closest to Edmonton, opportunities, and threats of the airports competing collect fees for landing and parking. Smaller airports with Wetaskiwin can be analyzed concurrently. including Camrose, Ponoka, Cooking Lake, and Wetaskiwin do not charge fees on order to attract 6.4.1 Strengths General Aviation activities, including recreational Proximity to a Population Centre – The majority of users. The imposition of fees, though at times airports serving Edmonton are better located relative modest, can reduce GA activity. Some airports, to the population centre than Wetaskiwin. Edmonton including Edmonton International, charge high fees International, Cooking Lake, Josephburg, and for landing and parking in part to recoup costs of Villeneuve are a short commute from the City, with certain amenities, but also to discourage small GA the furthest located 50 km from downtown. In activities that increase congestion and reduce airport comparison, Wetaskiwin is 70 km by road. The capacity during peak hours. distance of an airport from a highly populated area is Land Ownership – The ability for an airport user to important as it improves airports business’ ability to own the land that they wish to develop increases the retain skilled workers. It also assists in attracting availability of financing and allows them to build recreational users. equity with their assets. With the exception of Access to Global Transportation – Being located Cooking Lake, all airports competing with Wetaskiwin closer to Edmonton, Wetaskiwin’s competition is also offer land for development on a long-term lease basis. better able to provide access to air transportation. Land ownership is a competitive advantage that may Edmonton International Airport offers flights to attract users and businesses from Edmonton, destinations throughout North America, Central although the land available to sell at Wetaskiwin America, and Europe, attracting both pleasure and Airport is not owned by the City. business travellers. No other airport in Central Alberta provides travellers with as many destination and 6.4.3 Opportunities connection options. In fact, few Central Alberta Closure of Edmonton City Centre The impending airports provided scheduled passenger service. closure of Edmonton City Centre airport is not only a Additionally, Edmonton airports are well located to potential growth opportunity for airports serving link with road and rail transportation. The construction Edmonton, but for all airports in Central Alberta. The and implementation of Port Alberta will ensure that closure will force current airport businesses to the majority of air cargo destined to and originating in relocate to other airports, if they require airside Central Alberta will be processed through Edmonton access, or off airport. Airport businesses will consider International. factors like location, existing airport businesses, land availability, and fee structures in their decision. Airport Accessibility – Many airports in Central Edmonton Regional Airports Authority is well Alberta are equipped with navigational aids, approach positioned to absorb the majority of these businesses aids, and other systems to ensure airport availability at its three remaining airports. during most weather conditions. For example, Josephburg (Warren Thomas) Airport’s 4,500 ft Growing Population – Edmonton’s growing runway is equipped with radio controlled airport population is an opportunity for all airports in the lighting, PAPIs, ODALS, and is supported by an region. Between 2006 and 2011, Edmonton grew automated weather system. Compared to 12.1%, and above the Alberta average of 10.8%. It is Wetaskiwin, these amenities increase each airport’s unlikely for a prospective airport user or business to availability and attract desirable clientele, including bypass a viable airport in favour of another located corporate aviation. further away. With surplus capacity, Edmonton airports are anticipated to accommodate most growth.
Business Case for Runway Extension 6-4 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 44 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
6.4.4 Threats Transportation Alternatives – Alternative modes of transportation are a threat to airports. Consultations Competitive Airports – A common threat to airports suggest that Albertans, in general, are not averse to is the close proximity of other airports serving the travelling long distances by road for convenience and same clientele. With one international airport and cost saving purposes. Automobiles are regularly approximately 8 regional and recreational airports selected for travel to destinations throughout the vying for users in overlapping catchment areas, province and into neighbouring provinces. identifying and promoting competitive advantages is critical to long-term success. Additionally, the majority of freight generated in the province is destined for other Albertan communities. Wetaskiwin Airport is surrounded by competitive Because inter and intra-provincial cargo is generally airports and just outside the control zone of a large large and heavy in nature, it lends itself to ground international airport which is located between transportation. Wetaskiwin and its primary GA markets and industries in the Edmonton region.
Figure 6-1 – Regional Context – Airports and Air Services
1. Edmonton Int’l (EA)
2. Villeneuve (EA)
3. City Centre (EA) 5 2
4. Cooking Lake (EA) 3 5. Josephburg 6 6. Vegreville 4 1 7. Camrose
8. Wetaskiwin
9. Ponoka
7 10. Lacombe 8
9
10
Business Case for Runway Extension 6-5 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 45 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 46 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
7 Options Identification
7.1 Options Identification 7.2.2 Option 2: 5,500 ft Runway Like the first option, Option 2 focuses on corporate The two development options identified in the 2010 aviation use. The option includes many of the same Airside Development Plan Update were considered in infrastructure improvements including pavement the Business Case. Two additional development strengthening and constructing a full-length parallel options consistent with the very small market taxiway, but extended the runway to 5,500 ft. Such assessment and forecasts were identified. Forecasted an extension would extend the range of corporate traffic volumes are based on historical activity and aircraft already using the facility or allow for higher anticipated growth. The Business Case assumes that performance aircraft to utilize the facility. future traffic growth will be dependent upon Alberta’s The estimated cost of each project is presented in population, economy, and the performance of the GA Table 7-2. The total project cost is estimated to be industry. Activity will not be driven by infrastructure $14.9 Million. The airside improvements included in development. Option 1 are illustrated in Figure 7-2.
7.2 Development Plan Options Table 7-2 – Option 2 Cost Estimate Item Estimated Cost 7.2.1 Option 1: 5,000 ft Runway Existing Runway Strengthening $2,245,625 The first option in the 2010 Airside Development Plan Runway Extension (to 5,000 ft) $5,627,250 Update included infrastructure improvements Taxiway and Apron Strengthening $352,594 intended to accommodate Code C aircraft and Existing Taxiway Widening (5 m) $206,344 specifically corporate aircraft. Construction projects included strengthening runway, taxiway, and apron New Parallel Taxiway $5,014,125 pavement; extending the runway to 5,000 ft; widening Apron I Widening $567,088 Taxiways A and B; constructing a new full-length Electrical Improvements $896,875 parallel taxiway; and improving airfield lighting. The Total Project Cost* $14,909,900 estimated cost of each project is presented in Table *25% Engineering and Contingencies are included in the total 7-1. The total project cost was estimated to be $12.7 project cost. Million. The airside improvements included in Option 1 are illustrated in Figure 7-1. Options 1 and 2 consider the potential future Table 7-1 – Option 1 Cost Estimate development and expansion of the airport. However, these options do not address all existing infrastructure Item Estimated Cost deficiencies. Existing Runway Strengthening $2,245,625 Runway Extension (to 5,000 ft) $3,486,438 Taxiway and Apron Strengthening $352,594 Existing Taxiway Widening (5 m) $206,344 New Parallel Taxiway $5,014,125 Apron I Widening $567,088 Electrical Improvements $853,125 Total Project Cost* $12,725,338 *25% Engineering and Contingencies are included in the total project cost.
Business Case for Runway Extension 7-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 47 of 177
Page 48 of 177 of 48 Page
McFaul Mark Alderman by Presented - Report Aviation LPS
PARALLEL TAXIWAY RUNWAY EXTENSION RESERVE EXTENSION RUNWAY FULL-LENGTH RUNWAY EXTENDED TO 5,000 ft
REYNOLDS-ALBERTA MUSEUM 12 DEVELOPMENT
PRIVATE FUTURE AIRPORT PROPERTY AIRPORT
CAHOF 12 STORAGE BUILDING MUSEUM WIDENING (CODE C) STRENGTHENING &
TAXI 'C'
TAXIWAY
64 STREET 64
47 AVENUE 47 HIGHWAY 13 100') x (3,888' 12-30 RUNWAY TAXI 'B' STRENGTHENING RUNWAY APRON I EXPANSION
APRON I
AIRPORT PROPERTY AIRPORT
TAXI 'A' 'D' TAXI 62 STREET 62 APRON II STRENGTHENING APRON I 30 47 AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
SKYPORT
60 STREET 60 45 AVENUE 45 Filename Scale Date Approved By Drawn By Figure No. Title Client Notes 2. All dimensions 1. Preliminary Suite 250, Ottawa, ON, approximate 5,000 ft RUNWAY DEVELOPMENT www.lpsaviation.ca One Antares Drive, Canada K2E 8C4
OPTION 1
LPS_CEX3.dwg NTS MARCH 2012 EGL AIM 7 - 1
6a) # Item Agenda
Page 49 of 177 of 49 Page
McFaul Mark Alderman by Presented - Report Aviation LPS
PARALLEL TAXIWAY RUNWAY EXTENSION RESERVE EXTENSION RUNWAY FULL-LENGTH
RUNWAY EXTENDED
12 12 TO 5,500 ft REYNOLDS-ALBERTA MUSEUM DEVELOPMENT
PRIVATE FUTURE AIRPORT PROPERTY AIRPORT
CAHOF 12 STORAGE BUILDING MUSEUM WIDENING (CODE C) STRENGTHENING &
TAXI 'C'
TAXIWAY
64 STREET 64
47 AVENUE 47 HIGHWAY 13 100') x (3,888' 12-30 RUNWAY TAXI 'B' STRENGTHENING RUNWAY APRON I EXPANSION
APRON I
AIRPORT PROPERTY AIRPORT
TAXI 'A' 'D' TAXI 62 STREET 62 APRON II STRENGTHENING APRON I 30 47 AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
SKYPORT
60 STREET 60 45 AVENUE 45 Filename Scale Date Approved By Drawn By Figure No. Client Title Notes 2. All dimensions 1. Preliminary Suite 250, Ottawa, ON, approximate 5,500 ft RUNWAY DEVELOPMENT www.lpsaviation.ca One Antares Drive, Canada K2E 8C4
OPTION 2
LPS_CEX3.dwg NTS MARCH 2012 EGL AIM 7 - 2
6a) # Item Agenda Agenda Item # 6a)
7.3 Alternative Options 7.3.2 Option 4: Modest Improvements Option 4 incorporates the infrastructure improvements The options identified in the Development Plan recommended in Option 3, with the addition of an Update are not consistent with the market expansion to the public Apron 1. assessment and forecasts presented in Chapter 3. Expanding the apron would increase short and long- Alternative development options were identified to term aircraft parking capacity. This would be the most address the current and future markets and needs of appropriate option if the airport were to introduce airport users. parking fees. Parking fees would contribute to the capital costs of apron expansion. However, 7.3.1 Option 3: Status Quo maintenance and administration costs would also Option 3 identifies the infrastructure improvements increase if the apron were expanded for revenue required to maintain current airport operations. The generating purposes. installation of a sub-drain bisecting the entire length of The estimated cost of these improvements is Apron II appears to have resulted in significant presented in Table 7-4. The total project cost is pavement failure. Corrective action would involve the estimated to be $1.7 Million. The airside removal and replacement of the sub-drain and improvements recommended in Option 3 are reconstruction of the affected pavement. illustrated in Figure 7-3. Consultations suggest that this should be completed Table 7-4 – Option 4 Cost Estimate in the short-term to arrest further pavement failure. Like the two development plan options, improvements Item Estimated Cost to airfield lighting are recommended for status quo Repair Apron II $133,825 operations. Apron I Widening $708,859 Option 3 assumes the continuation and progressive Electrical Improvements $853,125 evolution of airport businesses and growth of the Total Project Cost* $1,695,809 Skyport development. *25% Engineering and Contingencies are included in the total The estimated cost of these improvements is project cost. presented in Table 7-3. The total cost is estimated to be $987,000. The improvements recommended in Options 3 and 4 provide more manageable and Option 3 are illustrated in Figure 7-3. realistic solutions to the issues currently facing the airport. While Options 1 and 2 demonstrate what is Table 7-3 – Option 3 Cost Estimate possible in the airport’s future, the alternative options Item Estimated Cost balance infrastructure improvements with current and forecasted market demand. Repair Apron II $133,825 Electrical Improvements $853,125 Total Project Cost* $986,950
*25% Engineering and Contingencies are included in the total project cost.
Business Case for Runway Extension 7-4 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 50 of 177
Page 51 of 177 of 51 Page
McFaul Mark Alderman by Presented - Report Aviation LPS RUNWAY EXTENSION RESERVE EXTENSION RUNWAY REYNOLDS-ALBERTA MUSEUM DEVELOPMENT
PRIVATE FUTURE AIRPORT PROPERTY AIRPORT
CAHOF 12 STORAGE BUILDING MUSEUM
TAXI 'C'
64 STREET 64
47 AVENUE 47 HIGHWAY 13 100') x (3,888' 12-30 RUNWAY TAXI 'B' APRON I EXPANSION (OPTION 4)
APRON I
AIRPORT PROPERTY AIRPORT
TAXI 'A' 'D' TAXI 62 STREET 62 APRON II
30 REHABILITATION (OPTION 3 & 4) 47 AVENUE APRON II DEVELOPMENT
SKYPORT
60 STREET 60 45 AVENUE 45 Filename Scale Date Approved By Drawn By Figure No. Title Client Notes 2. All dimensions 1. Preliminary Suite 250, Ottawa, ON, approximate IMPROVEMENTS DEVELOPMENT www.lpsaviation.ca One Antares Drive, Canada K2E 8C4
OPTION 4 MODEST
LPS_CEX3.dwg NTS MARCH 2012 EGL AIM 7 - 3
6a) # Item Agenda Agenda Item # 6a)
7.4 Cost Comparison Projects including the repair of Apron II and improvements to airfield lighting will increase safety A cost comparison shows the breakdown of capital and improve user experience. The expansion of costs by airfield component for each of the four Apron I has the potential to provide measurable options. Options 1 and 2 include greater emphasis on benefit to the community through new parking fee pavement strengthening, runway extension, and revenue. taxiway construction. Stakeholder consultations and Considerably less expensive than Options 1 and 2, market assessment suggest that these are not high Options 3 and 4 provide greater value to the City of priority items within the short or medium term Wetaskiwin based on the identified needs of the planning horizons. airport. Options 3 and 4 focus on improving existing airport infrastructure and, maintaining a good level of service for current and potential users.
Table 7-5 – Development Option Cost Comparison
Option Runway Taxiways Aprons Electrical Total
1. 5,000 ft Runway 5.7 Million 5.4 Million 0.7 Million 0.9 Million 12.7 Million
2. 5,500 ft Runway 7.9 Million 5.4 Million 0.7 Million 0.9 Million 14.9 Million
3. Status Quo No Cost No Cost 0.1 Million 0.9 Million 1.0 Million
4. Modest Improvements No Cost No Cost 0.8 Million 0.9 Million 1.7 Million
Infrastructure improvement costs extracted from EBA’s 2010 Development Plan Update. Additional option cost estimates are based on EBA cost structure for purposes of comparison.
Business Case for Runway Extension 7-6 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 52 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
8 Business Case
Market and demand assessments show that Airports can elect to charge a landing fee in improvements to airport infrastructure are not proportion to the weight of the aircraft, but with a required to support growth in local economic activity. variable rate per unit of weight for different ranges. No new measurable impacts were found to the Table 8-1 provides a typical landing fee structure current estimates of the airports’ economic impact on implemented in Western Canada. These fees were the City and region. Few if any new indirect or utilized in revenue forecasting. induced benefits will accrue to the City based on the latest market research. For this reason, the impact of Table 8-1 – Proposed Aircraft Landing Fees capital improvements on airport financial performance Jet Turboprop and Weight Bracket (kg) is considered to be the remaining means for Aircraft Twin Aircraft assessing the business case for infrastructure expansion. Minimum $7.80 $7.80 Per 1,000 kg 8.1 Revenue Opportunities < = 21,000 $2.20 $1.95 The airport currently generates direct revenue solely > 21,000 to 45,000 $2.85 $2.45 through collection of surcharges on aviation fuel sold > 45,000 $3.35 $2.95 at the facility. Comparing direct revenue and expenditures, fuel surcharges are approximately 4% of expenditures. The City could pursue additional Collecting aircraft landing fees will require the sources of airport revenue to reduce the current installation of a reliable recording system, not only operating deficit. Based on a review of revenue measuring aircraft movements, but also recording generating activities at other Canadian airports, the aircraft registration. Also, administrative expenses following examples were found relevant. would increase as invoices would have to be prepared and distributed and the bills processed. 8.1.1 Airport Fees Aircraft Parking Fees Aircraft Landing Fees Aircraft parking and tie-down fees are collected by an Landing fees are collected by an airport operator and airport for the use of apron stands, remote parking are charged primarily for the use of airside facilities, aircraft tie-downs, and plug-ins. These fees infrastructure (i.e. runways, taxiways, and aprons). are normally calculated based on the weight of the These fees are usually identified by using a formula aircraft or its dimensions. that relates aircraft weight to the charge being Airports may elect to charge parking fees based on incurred by the aircraft operator. the amount of time an aircraft is positioned within the Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) is generally used aircraft parking area, and the parking area’s location. as the reference weight when this fee is being Typically, only itinerant aircraft are invoiced, and calculated; however, some airports may choose to aircraft owned and operated by airport tenants are not use the Maximum Landing Weight (MLW) for this required to pay aircraft parking fees. purpose. The fee structure outlined in Table 8-2 was used for Landing fees are generally structured by bracketing, forecasting purposes. where a fixed charge will be levied up to a specified weight threshold. Sometimes a surcharge proportional to a given weight above a particular threshold is added.
Business Case for Runway Extension 8-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 53 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Table 8-2 – Proposed Aircraft Parking Fees 8.1.2 Fly-in Camping Aircraft Daily Monthly Annual Offering private pilots the opportunity to camp on Parking Fees Charge Charge Charge airport property is a unique method for attracting GA 0 to 2,000kg $5.00 $75.00 $400.00 activity and increasing airport revenue. The airport is 2,001 to well located, adjacent to two of Alberta’s most popular $7.50 $90.00 $500.00 5,000kg aviation tourist attractions, the Reynolds-Alberta Museum and Canada’s Aviation Hall of Fame. 5,001 to $10.00 $125.00 $600.00 10,000kg Preparing areas suitable for camping would have a 10,001 to comparatively low cost. Fly-in campers typically visit $17.00 $125.00 $600.00 30,000kg a community for a period of days, use local hotels, 30,001 to restaurants, food and retail outlets and laundromats, $25.00 $125.00 $600.00 60,000kg as well as car rental and other support services. 60,001 to $40.00 $125.00 $600.00 100,000kg 8.2 Revenue and Expense 100,001 to $65.00 $125.00 $600.00 Forecast 200,000kg All fees exclude GST unless otherwise noted A forecast of airport revenues and expenditures is provided below to determine the potential impact of Implementing parking fees, like landing fees, will airport fee implementation. A number of economic require the implementation of a monitoring system factors could affect the results of the forecast and the and will have associated administrative costs. success of the airport’s revenue generating initiatives such as actual rates of traffic growth which are Airport Access Fees subject to prevailing economic conditions. Access fees are charged at some airports, specifically Table 8-3 details the incremental increase in revenue those that do not collect lease revenue from resulting from maintaining the fuel surcharge and commercial lands or from businesses requiring airside implementing parking and landing fees. Figure 8-1 access but who are not located on the airport. illustrates the impact of fee implementation on the Typical airport land leases with airside access contain airport’s financial performance. Though fee two components, a base land rent and an annual implementation would increase revenues, an airport maintenance charge (AMC). The AMC is set operational deficit is still anticipated. periodically to apportion cost recovery of airside operational maintenance costs among the users. Table 8-3 – Potential Annual Airport Revenue* Fuel Landing Parking Total The airport access fee is a nominal fee typically Year charged based on the number and weight of aircraft Surcharge Fee Fee Revenue or a flat annual fee for airside access. Access fees 2011 $3,945 $24,403 $7,548 $35,897 are common at airports serving fly-in communities and residential airparks. 2016 $7,359 $27,315 $8,449 $43,123 Because the municipal tax collected from airport 2021 $8,237 $30,574 $9,457 $48,269 landowners does not contribute to the operation and 2026 $9,220 $34,222 $10,585 $54,028 maintenance of the airport, a modest access fee 2031 $10,320 $38,306 $11,849 $60,475 would help to recoup some those costs. Access fees have not been included in revenue forecasts. * Excludes Access fees
Business Case for Runway Extension 8-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 54 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Figure 8-1 – Impact of Fee Implementation on Financial Performance
$180,000
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$- 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Historical Expenses Forecast Expenses Historical Revenue Forecast Revenue Forecast Revenue + Fees
8.3 Revenue and Capital Cost Capital Costs refer to the capital required to rehabilitate and improve airport facilities to support Comparison the forecasted use. The Difference column represents the gap forecasted between the revenue and A comparison of the operating deficit relative to the expenditures, including capital costs. Regardless of capital cost of each scenario is provided. The the option implemented, based on the forecasted comparison defines the potential financial surplus or revenues and capital costs, there will be a deficit that can be attributed to each development considerable gap between the capital requirements of option. Table 8-4 presents the 20 Year Revenue and each option and the expected revenue. Capital Cost Comparison. For the purpose of comparison, Revenue refers to the amount of The goal of most airports is not necessarily to be revenue derived directly from the implementation of financially profitable, but to facilitate greater economic airport fees, less property tax. Expenses refer to the benefit in a region. Though an airport may be airports gross expenditures less amortization. perceived as a drain on municipal resources, the expenses accruing at an airport are frequently offset by economic gains within the community. The economic gains often outweigh the airport’s deficit.
Table 8-4 – 20 Year Revenue and Capital Cost Comparison* 20 Year 20 Year 20 Year Scenario Capital Difference Revenue Expenses Costs 1. 5,000 ft Runway $ 1,017,796 $ 3,163,656 $ 12,725,338 $(14,871,198) 2. 5,500 ft Runway $ 1,017,796 $ 3,163,656 $ 14,909,900 $(17,055,760) 3. Status Quo $ 1,017,796 $ 3,163,656 $ 986,950 $(3,132,810) 4. Modest Improvement $ 1,017,796 $ 3,163,656 $ 1,695,809 $(3,841,669) * Current dollars. Interest rates and time value of money not considered .
Business Case for Runway Extension 8-3 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 55 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
8.4 Business Case Summary Table 8-5 summarizes the case for runway extension at Wetaskiwin Airport. Stakeholder consultations, financial analyses, capital Critical areas including industry demand, costing, alternative option identification, and revenue infrastructure, economic impact, and cost-benefit impact evaluation tasks were undertaken to estimate were assessed in depth. the value of airport improvements.
Table 8-5 – Market Demand and Business Case Summary
Element Factors Demand/Impact
New or Expanded Business Sectors Scheduled Airlines No Demand Requiring Airport Expansion Air Charter No Additional Demand Air Cargo No Demand Aviation Maintenance/Support No Additional Demand Oil & Gas No Additional Demand Natural Resources No Additional Demand Manufacturing No Demand Distribution No Demand Government, Health, Security No Additional Demand Infrastructure Upgrades to Serve Markets No Additional Need Safety and Operations Minor Investments Economic Impact Current $11-15 Million (EBA, 2006) Post Expansion No Measurable Impact Cost-Benefit Analysis 5,500 ft Runway ($14.9 Million + No Quantifiable Benefits Increased Operating Costs)
5,000 ft Runway ($12.7 Million + No Quantifiable Benefits Increased Operating Costs) Modest Apron Expansion + New Parking and Fuel Fees Electrical Upgrades Safety and Level of Service Summary Business Case for Runway Increased Revenues to City None – Land Sales by Developer Extension (5,000 ft or 5,500 ft) Tax Benefit to City Municipal Property Taxes Only Increased Employment Temporary - Construction Impact on GDP Marginal
Business Case for Runway Extension 8-4 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 56 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
9 Conclusions and Recommendations
9.1 Conclusions 9.2 Recommendations
1. Wetaskiwin’s proximity to Edmonton International The following recommendations could reduce the Airport provides residents with excellent access financial burden of the Wetaskiwin Airport on the City to air transportation. and improve the level of service and safety provided to users: 2. Local industry, primarily light industrial and agriculture, has no demand for improved airport 1. Undertake modest improvements to airside facilities. Industry demand for air cargo and infrastructure – Repairing Apron II, correcting business travel is met by Edmonton International. the airfield lighting, and expanding Apron I will increase the level of service and safety to airport 3. Airport infrastructure improvements are unlikely users and improve the airport’s ability to generate to persuade aviation businesses to relocate to revenue. Wetaskiwin, specifically those currently operating at Edmonton City Centre Airport. 2. Implement airport fees – Introduction of landing and parking fees will improve the airport’s 4. Wetaskiwin Airport is in generally good condition financial performance. Consideration may also and capable of meeting the needs of the current be given to implementation of access fees to users with minor improvements. assist in covering annual airport maintenance costs. 5. The 2010 Airside Development Plan Update details improvements to airside infrastructure that 3. Ensure accurate recording or aircraft exceed market requirements. movements – Maintaining accurate records of aircraft activity will allow for historical analysis of 6. Wetaskiwin Airport operates with a financial airport performance. Providing reliable statistics operating deficit. Potential implementation of could be crucial in obtaining grant funding for airport fees and other charges could reduce but future improvement projects. not eliminate the annual operational deficit. 4. Protect lands for future improvements – 7. The airport’s economic benefit to the community Although there is no measurable or foreseen will not be measurably improved by expanding demand justifying extension of the runway, the airside infrastructure except for creation of City should protect the land in the long-term as temporary jobs during the construction phase. an airport reserve.
Business Case for Runway Extension 9-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 57 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 58 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Appendix A – Central Alberta Population Distribution
Business Case for Runway Extension A-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 59 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 60 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Client Figure Legend Figure No. A-1 Drawn By 75% Canada’s Population AIM Approved By Population Distribution 24% Canada’s Population EGL Central Alberta <1% Canada’s Population Date Airports in Study March 2012 One Antares Drive, Scale Suite 250, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2E 8C4 NTS Filename www.lpsaviation.ca Population Distribution.cdr
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 61 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 62 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Appendix B – Aircraft Movement Forecasts
3
Business Case for Runway Extension B-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 63 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 64 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Table B-1 – Wetaskiwin Regional Airport Forecasted Aircraft Movements
Year Historical Low Medium High 2001 18,127 2002 17,018 2003 20,955 2004 22,003 2005 23,103 2006 20,793 2007 18,713 2008 17,309 2009 15,904 2010 14,500 2011 14,738 14,918 14,990 2012 14,979 15,258 15,497 2013 15,225 15,606 16,021 2014 15,475 15,961 16,562 2015 15,729 16,325 17,122 2016 15,976 16,698 17,784 2017 16,226 17,078 18,473 2018 16,481 17,468 19,188 2019 16,740 17,866 19,930 2020 17,003 18,273 20,701 2021 17,237 18,690 21,451 2022 17,475 19,116 22,227 2023 17,716 19,552 23,032 2024 17,961 19,998 23,866 2025 18,209 20,454 24,730 2026 18,427 20,920 25,625 2027 18,648 21,397 26,553 2028 18,872 21,885 27,514 2029 19,099 22,384 28,510 2030 19,328 22,894 29,542 2031 19,560 23,416 30,611
2010-2015 1.64% 2.28% 3.38% 2015-2020 1.57% 2.28% 3.87% 2020-2025 1.38% 2.28% 3.62% 2025-2031 1.20% 2.28% 3.62%
3
Business Case for Runway Extension B-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 65 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 66 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Appendix C – Historical Financial Statements
3
Business Case for Runway Extension C-1 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 67 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 68 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
Table C-1 – Wetaskiwin Regional Airport Consolidated Financial Statements 2007-2010 % % % DESCRIPTION 2007 2008 2009 2010 CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE REVENUE Airport Municipal Taxes $(40,393.33) $(47,162.48) 17% $(47,208.56) 0% $(56,155.79) 19% Local Improvements $(914.56) $(914.56) 0% $(914.56) 0% $ 914.56) 0% Airport Gas Sales $(3,050.01) $(3,423.75) 12% $(3,725.28) 9% $(3,856.96) 4% Miscellaneous Revenue $(55.57) $0 -100% $(2,810.50) - $0 -100% Cost Recoveries $0 $(219.00) - $0 -100% $0 0% TOTAL REVENUE $(44,413.47) $(51,719.79) 16% $(54,658.90) 6% $(60,927.31) 11% EXPENSES Wages $12,670.70 $14,679.47 16% $12,179.68 -17% $15,480.64 27% Standby $12.16 $2.62 -78% $0 -100% $2.64 - Overtime $308.58 $148.41 -52% $29.46 -80% $194.26 559% Employer Contributions $2,471.42 $3,122.19 26% $2,838.09 -9% $3,482.66 23% WCB $165.25 $223.07 35% $174.18 -22% $176.61 1% Training $0 $3,872.50 - $2,007.15 -48% $642.86 -68% Business Travel/Expense $9,739.65 $1,989.20 -80% $1,488.46 -25% $1,701.63 14% Mileage Expense $1,502.37 $1,320.99 -12% $243.74 -82% $0 -100% Memberships $314.13 $1,424.12 353% $1,378.94 -3% $1,175.00 -15% Meal Expense $1,016.94 $0 -100% $0 - $0 - Postage $62.32 $37.56 -40% $32.26 -14% $0 -100% Telephone/Fax $4,340.30 $2,409.49 -44% $2,288.22 -5% $1,866.76 -18% Advertising/Promotion $1,362.64 $888.36 -35% $600.00 -32% $0 -100% Subscriptions/Publications $190.50 $174.00 -9% $174.00 0% $174.00 0% Annual Fees $172.00 $164.00 -5% $164.00 0% $164.00 0% Contracted Services $43,906.00 $37,369.13 -15% $39,204.00 5% $39,123.00 0% Contracted Services (Certification) $22,135.85 $9,093.09 -59% $11,002.68 21% $6,075 -45% Electrical $409.56 $832.67 103% $685.69 -18% $143.46 -79% Building Maintenance $7,184.63 $4,987.55 -31% $5,787.51 16% $7,381.98 28% Equipment Maintenance Contract $1,838.50 $837.00 -54% $749.00 -11% $587.10 -22% Equipment Rentals/Lease $17,475.00 $150.00 -99% $0 -100% $0 - Insurance $8,687.19 $8,018.54 -8% $8,695.94 8% $6,683.00 -23% Other Miscellaneous Services $1,091.71 $613.88 -44% $2,999.33 389% $3,637.71 21% Stationary $59.95 $170.00 184% $46.70 -73% $0 -100% Wildlife Management Expense $0 $0 - $292.74 $236.37 -19% Other Miscellaneous Supplies $1,102.51 $1,557.30 41% $0 -100% $0 - Chemicals/Salts $0 $0 - $2,905.80 - $(1,235.21) -143% Paving/Curb/Sidewalk Materials $872.45 $424.00 -51% $0 -100% $4,161.60 - Hardware/Plumbing/Electrical $1,122.80 $1,695.60 51% $663.50 -61% $1,570.10 137% Water $649.11 $703.57 8% $1,395.22 98% $1,246.28 -11% Gas $1,703.14 $1,807.07 6% $2,997.06 66% $3,176.91 6% Electricity $6,167.34 $5,617.34 -9% $7,575.95 35% $7,967.26 5% Garbage $87.12 $0 -100% $0 - $0 - Interest $679.20 $656.45 -3% $632.62 -4% $607.63 -4% Principal $466.60 $489.04 5% $512.55 5% $537.19 5% Equipment Pool Charges $11,431.95 $13,482.66 18% $9,411.90 -30% $5,992.13 -36% Amortization Expense $0 $0 0% $103,865.08 - $115,159.18 11% TOTAL EXPENSES $161,399.57 $118,960.87 -26% $223,021.45 87% $228,111.75 2%
SURPLUS/DEFICIT $116,986.10 $67,241.08 -43% $168,362.55 150% $167,184.44 -1%
3
Business Case for Runway Extension C-2 Wetaskiwin Regional Airport
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 69 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 70 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 71 of 177 Agenda Item # 6a)
One Antares Drive, Suite 250
Ottawa, ON K2E 8C4
Telephone: (613) 226-6050
Fax: (613) 226-5236
e-mail: [email protected]
www.lpsaviation.ca
LPS Aviation Report - Presented by Alderman Mark McFaul Page 72 of 177 LPS Aviation Report - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Wetaskiwin Regional Airport Business Case for Expansion Stakeholder Workshop
Agenda Item#6a) Page 73 of177
LPS Aviation Report
Agenda - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul . Introduction . Regional Context . Wetaskiwin Airport . Consultation Results . Market Assessments . Financial Situation
BREAK Agenda Item#6a) . Development Options and Costs Page 74 of177 . Business Case Summary . Open Discussion
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 2
LPS Aviation Report
LPS Aviation Inc - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
• LPS AVIA Consulting . 20 years, 330 projects in all aspects of aviation planning and management • Ted Lennox, P.Eng . President, LPS AVIA . 37 years’ aviation experience (Airports, Airlines, ATC)
. Civil Engineer (member of APEGGA since 1983)
• Andrew Macdonald, B.Comm. Agenda Item#6a) . Airport Planner (University of Guelph + Georgian College Aviation program) . 4 years’ aviation experience (Airport Master Planning, Business Cases) Page 75 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 3
LPS Aviation Report
Objectives - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
1. Determine realistic targets for air services and aviation activity 2. Identify the need and/or scope of airport investment 3. Measure the costs and benefits of a longer runway in the immediate term and the future 4. Identify potential sources of operational revenue 5. Report the findings to key community decision makers Agenda Item#6a) Page 76 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 4
LPS Aviation Report
Study Summary - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
• Regional Context • Consultations and Research • Market Assessment • Financial Review • Development Plan Review
• Development Options • Business Case Agenda Item#6a) Page 77 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 5
LPS Aviation Report
Regional Context – Population - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Heavy Industrial
Light Industrial
Light Industrial Agenda Item#6a) Agricultural Page 78 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 6
LPS Aviation Report
Regional Context – Airports and Air Services - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
1. Edmonton Int’l (EA) 2. Villeneuve (EA) 3. City Centre (EA) 4. Cooking Lake (EA) 5. Josephburg 6. Vegreville 7. Camrose Agenda Item#6a) 8. Wetaskiwin Page 79 of177 9. Ponoka 10. Lacombe
March 1, 2012 7
LPS Aviation Report
Regional Context - Airports - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Longest Best Scheduled Airport Runways Runway (ft.) Approach Services
Edmonton Int’l 2 10,995 Multiple ILS Yes City Centre 1 5,870 RNAV No Josephburg 1 4,560 RNAV No Camrose 1 4,512 RNAV No
Vegreville 1 4,000 RNAV No
Wetaskiwin 1 3,888 RNAV No Agenda Item#6a) Villeneuve 2 3,499 RNAV No Page 80 of177 Ponoka 1 3,089 NDB No Lacombe 1 3,000 None No Cooking Lake 1 2,952 None No
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 8
LPS Aviation Report
Edmonton International - GA Markets - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 81 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 9
LPS Aviation Report
Edmonton International – GA Forecasts - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000 GA Aircraft Movements
5,000 Agenda Item#6a)
0
Page 82 of177 1 20 2 22 23 11 13 14 15 17 18 19 0 09 10 20 20 2 20 20 20 20 20 20 2012 20 20 20 2016 20
Low Baseline High
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 10
LPS Aviation Report
Edmonton International GA Development Plan - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 83 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 11
LPS Aviation Report
Villeneuve Airport Master Plan - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 84 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 12
LPS Aviation Report
Cooking Lake Master Plan - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 85 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 13
LPS Aviation Report
Edmonton120,000 City Centre - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
100,000 40 Year Traffic Pattern
80,000
60,000 s
Operation
40,000 Agenda Item#6a)
20,000 Page 86 of177
0
67 1966 19 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 Other Commercial Before 1991 Other Commercial After 1991 Private Civil Government Military 1974 1975 1976 78 1977 19 1979 81 1980 19 1982 983 84 1 19 1985 986 87 1 9 19 1988 8 March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting19 91 2 14 1990 19 9 19 4 1993 99 1 7 1995 1996 9 19 0 1998 1999 0 20 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 LPS Aviation Report
Edmonton Airports – Response to Closure - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
. General Aviation Strategy (LPS AVIA) . International = Large and Medium GA, Commercial . Villeneuve = Smaller GA, Business, Commercial, Flying Training . Cooking Lake = Flying Training, Recreational, Private
. Re-forecasted GA traffic growth in 2010 (LPS AVIA) Agenda Item#6a) . City Centre traffic re-allocation estimate (LPS AVIA) was:
Page 87 of177 . International = Largest share . Villeneuve = Moderate share . Cooking Lake = Small share
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 15
LPS Aviation Report
Research and Consultations - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
• Wetaskiwin Airport owned and operated by City • Serves City and County • Certified airport • Used by aviation businesses and private aircraft owners
• Very low fees and revenues
• Most airport costs carried by City Agenda Item#6a) • Developable land controlled by private owner Page 88 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 16
LPS Aviation Report
Research – Airport Boundary - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Additional Land For Extension
Agenda Item#6a) Page 89 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 17
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case Consultations (60) - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Public Officials Local Business Potential Tenants 1. Mayor and Council 1. Skyport Properties 1. Airco Aircraft Charters 2. Air Spray 2. City Manager 2. Home Hardware DC 3. Manluk Industries 3. Alberta Aero Engines 3. Airport Manager 4. Canadian Helicopters 4. A.C. Dandy 4. Finance 5. KMC Mining 5. Saputo Dairy 5. Public Works 6. Novex HeliTrades 6. Wetaskiwin Chamber of 7. Salzman Aviation 6. Economic Development Commerce 8. Centennial Flight Centre 7. County of Wetaskiwin 7. Supreme International 9. Ducey Avionics 10. Edmonton Aero Interiors Airport Tenants/Users Community 11. EZ Air Heli Services 1. Wetaskiwin Air Services 1. Reynolds-Alberta Museum 12. Global Remote Sensing Agenda Item#6a) 2. Central Aviation 2. Canada’s Aviation Hall of Fame 13. Goulet Aircraft Supply 14. Harv Air 3. Wetaskiwin Aerial Applicators 3. RCMP
Page 90 of177 15. Kitplane Corp 4. Wetaskiwin Air Show 4. Alberta Health Services 16. Edmonton Flying Club 5. Wetaskiwin Flying Club 17. Geographic Air Survey 18. Thomas Aircraft Maintenance 19. Foster Aircraft Maintenance
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 18
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case Consultations - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Public Officials Comments 1. Mayor and Council • Generally supportive of airport 2. City Manager • Understanding of role airport plays in 3. Airport Manager community, local economy 4. Finance • Must balance airport improvements
with other public infrastructure 5. Public Works projects 6. Economic Agenda Item#6a) • Identified some potential markets Development which might support airport expansion Page 91 of177 7. County of for follow-up by LPS AVIA Wetaskiwin
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 19
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case Consultations - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Airport Businesses Comments 1. Wetaskiwin Air • Existing infrastructure meets Services requirements of current users 2. Central Aviation • Repairs needed in some areas • Runway electrical 3. Wetaskiwin Aerial • Apron size and drainage Applicators • Need for developable land more
4. Wetaskiwin Air Show Agenda Item#6a) important than runway extension 5. Wetaskiwin Flying • Some desire to accommodate
Page 92 of177 Club Snowbirds • Concerned about possibility of fee implementation
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 20
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case Consultations - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Local Businesses Comments • All shipping by road and rail 1. Skyport Properties • Air travel typically by mainline carriers 2. Home Hardware DC • Corporate aviation likely through 3. Manluk Industries Edmonton International, regardless of Wetaskiwin runway extension 4. A.C. Dandy 5. Saputo Dairy Agenda Item#6a) 6. Wetaskiwin Chamber of Commerce Page 93 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 21
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case Consultations - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Community Comments
1. Reynolds-Alberta • Interest in and support of airport varies Museum • Local institutions (RCMP, Hospital) 2. Canada’s Aviation Hall have limited requirement for regional of Fame airport
3. RCMP • Other institutions (Museum, Hall of 4. Alberta Health Fame) utilize airport but do require Agenda Item#6a) Services improvements
Page 94 of177 • Expansion to accommodate small business jets “nice to have” but not needed at this time
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 22
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case Consultations - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Potential Tenants (YXD) Comments 1. Air Spray 2. Airco Aircraft Charters • Currently about 40 tenants at YZD 3. Alberta Aero Engine 4. Canadian Helicopters • 50% of most likely tenants polled 5. KMC Mining 6. Novex HeliTrades • Little or no interest found for relocation 7. Salzman Aviation to Wetaskiwin Airport 8. Centennial Flight Centre 9. Ducey Avionics • Many YXD tenants have relocated, or 10. Edmonton Aero Interiors already selected new locations 11. EZ Air Heli Services 12. Global Remote Sensing • Several have not ruled out Wetaskiwin, Agenda Item#6a) 13. Harv Air but other airports favoured 14. Kitplane Corp
Page 95 of177 15. Edmonton Flying Club • Wetaskiwin cited as too distant from 16. Goulet Aircraft Supply Edmonton with few airport businesses 17. Geographic Air Survey 18. Thomas Aircraft Maintenance 19. Foster Aircraft Maintenance
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 23
LPS Aviation Report
Market Assessments by Segment - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul . Scheduled Passenger Services
. Proximity to Edmonton International
. Small community with low sustainable demand – very high fares!
. Charter Passenger Services
. Market too small to sustain large-scale operations Agenda Item#6a) . Small scale demand met by existing operators
. Choice of destinations, prices, schedules at Edmonton International Page 96 of177 . Energy companies consolidate passengers at Calgary and Edmonton
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 24
LPS Aviation Report
Market Assessments by Segment - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
. Air Cargo . Categories: Air Courier, Air Freight, Air Mail . Need demand for air cargo services (origin, destination, or both) . Local industry ships by road and rail
. Edmonton and Calgary within driving
distance/times Agenda Item#6a) . 10X factor before moving from road to air Page 97 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 25
LPS Aviation Report
Market Assessments by Segment - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul . Aviation Maintenance/Support . Existing businesses support clientele . No demands for local expansion . No shortage of space/ maintainers at other area airports . Oil and Gas
. Occasional small aircraft charters
. No foreseen demand due to low local Agenda Item#6a) activity levels
Page 98 of177 . Natural Resources . Occasional use . No known need for expansion
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 26
LPS Aviation Report
Market Assessments by Segment - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul . Manufacturing . No demand for air services from existing businesses . Distribution . Westaskiwin is excellent location for central road distribution network for Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia . Government, Health, Security
. Air ambulance has moved primarily to helicopter operations . Fixed-wing operations not significant time-saver over road ambulance Agenda Item#6a) . RCMP have no known need for air access to Wetaskiwin
Page 99 of177 . Not an essential airport for Alberta Forestry . Government VIP transport can access existing runway . had problem with pavements when using Dash 8 (50 passenger aircraft)
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 27
LPS Aviation Report
Market Assessment and Forecast - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
• Catchment area(s) varies by each potential airport use • Edmonton International dominates air transportation in region • Wetaskiwin user requirements not anticipated to increase in the short-term
• GA forecast prepared for 20 year period – low, medium, high growth scenarios Agenda Item#6a) Page 100 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 28
LPS Aviation Report
Market Assessment and Forecasts - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
35,000
30,000 s 25,000
20,000
15,000
Annual Aircraft Movement Aircraft Annual 10,000
5,000
- 1 1 3 27 29 03 09 015 017 019 021 023 0 0 2 001 003 0 01 01 2 2 2 2 2 2025 2 2 2 2 2005 2007 2 2 2 Agenda Item#6a)
Historical Low Medium High
Page 101 of177 Low Growth = 1.6% - Alberta GDP and Population projections Medium Growth = 2.3% - North American GA Projections (TC + FAA) High Growth = 3.6% - General Aviation experience
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 29
LPS Aviation Report
Airport Financials 2007-2010 - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
• Revenues have grown from $44,413 to $60,927 (+37%) . Comprised of property taxes and fuel surcharges . Property taxes do not directly fund airport operations or capital improvements
• Expenditures have grown from 161,399 to 228,111 (+41%)
. Major drivers are: Wages, Utilities, and Amortization Agenda Item#6a)
Page 102 of177 • In 2010, if amortization costs and tax revenues are removed, the airport has an operating deficit of approximately $108,000
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 30
LPS Aviation Report
Airport Revenue - 2010 - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000 Agenda Item#6a)
$50,000
Page 103 of177 $- Revenue Expenses Revenue Less Property Tax Expenses Less Amortization
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 31
LPS Aviation Report
Airport Revenue Opportunities - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
• Airport Fees . Landing Fees +$26,700 by 2015 +$37,500 by 2030 . Aircraft Parking Fees + $8,300 by 2015 + $11,600 by 2030 . Access Fees Used at other airports
•Fly-in Camping . Tourist Attractions Agenda Item#6a) . Reynolds-Alberta Museum, Canada’s Aviation Hall of Fame) . Low infrastructure costs to develop Page 104 of177 . Attract specialty private tours such as Alaska-bound flights
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 32
LPS Aviation Report
Airport Revenue Opportunities – Fee Impact - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
$180,000
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000 Agenda Item#6a) $- 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Historical Expenses Forecast Expenses Historical Revenue Forecast Revenue Forecast Revenue + Fees Page 105 of177 . Landing and parking fees collected . Expenses less Amortization . Typical fee structure applied . Revenue less Municipal Taxes
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 33
LPS Aviation Report
Break - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 106 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 34
LPS Aviation Report
Task 5 – Development Plan Review - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
. 2010 Development Plan does not provide concrete justification for expansion . Focus on large corporate and small regional jets, . Design aircraft not named . Current Infrastructure meets operational requirements – code, pavement strength
. Development Plan scenarios exceed forecasted airport requirements Agenda Item#6a) Page 107 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 35
LPS Aviation Report
Runway Development - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Bombardier Scenarios Considered: CRJ 200 50 seats 1. 5,500 ft. Runway Bombardier 2. 5,000 ft. Runway Challenger 601 13 seats Agenda Item#6a)
3. Modest Improvements Beech Page 108 of177 King Air 200 4. Status Quo 8-13 seats
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 36
LPS Aviation Report
Airport Development - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
. 2006 Socio-Economic Opportunity Assessment . airport estimated to provide approximately $11 to 15 million in direct and indirect benefits to the City and County of Wetaskiwin . opportunity to increase the benefits if larger aircraft can be accommodated . 2010 Revised Airport Development Plan
. Developments would provide opportunities for aviation growth . Expansion will provide expanded opportunity for economic growth in region. Agenda Item#6a) . In order to determine a runway length suitable to the airport and its users, it is recommended that the City of Wetaskiwin conduct a survey of their target
Page 109 of177 markets (i.e., oil and gas companies, companies requiring cargo transportation, and tourism companies) to determine their runway requirements and restrictions (i.e., payloads).
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 37
LPS Aviation Report
Development Scenarios - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul 1. 5,500 ft Runway . Pavement Strengthening . Runway Extension (490m) . Taxiway and Apron widening . Parallel taxiway . Event driven – no forecasted demand
2. 5,000 ft Runway
. Pavement Strengthening Agenda Item#6a) . Runway Extension (340m) . Taxiway and Apron widening Page 110 of177 . Parallel taxiway . Event driven – no forecasted demand
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 38
LPS Aviation Report
Option 1 5,500 ft. Runway (Code C) - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 111 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 39
LPS Aviation Report
Option 2 5,000 ft. Runway (Code C) - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 112 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 40
LPS Aviation Report
Development Scenarios - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
4. Modest Improvements . Repair and upkeep of existing infrastructure . Expanded Apron I for additional aircraft parking . Current airport businesses and aircraft size mix (up to King Air 200) . Increased aircraft movements (charters, flight training)
5. Status Quo
. Repair and upkeep of existing infrastructure Agenda Item#6a) . Assumes continuation and progressive evolution of airport tenants and growth of Skyport
Page 113 of177 . Current airport businesses and aircraft size mix (up to King Air 200) . Increased aircraft movements (charters, flight training)
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 41
LPS Aviation Report
Option 3 Existing 3,888 ft. Runway (Code 2) - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Runway Lighting Upgrades Public Apron Extension Apron Improvements
Agenda Item#6a) Page 114 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 42
LPS Aviation Report
Cost Estimates - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Total Option Runway Taxiways Aprons Electrical Cost ($) Status Quo No Cost No Cost 0.1 M 0.9 M 1.0 M No Cost No Cost 0.8 M 0.9 M 1.7 M Modest Improvements
5.7 M 5.4 M 0.7 M 0.9 M 12.7 M 5,000 ft. Runway
7.9 M 5.4 M 0.7 M 0.9 M 14.9 M 5,500 ft. Runway Agenda Item#6a)
Page 115 of177 Runway extension costs extracted from EBA’s 2010 Development Plan. Alternate options cost estimates based on EBA cost structure. – 20 year planning horizon
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 43
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul Scheduled Airlines No demand Air Charter No additional demand New or expanded Air Cargo No demand Business Sectors Aviation Maintenance/Support No additional demand requiring Expansion of Wetaskiwin Airport Oil & Gas No additional demand Natural Resources No additional demand
Manufacturing No demand Distribution No demand Agenda Item#6a) Government, Health, Security No additional demand Infrastructure Upgrades to serve markets No additional needs Page 116 of177 Safety and Operations Minor investments Economic Impact Current $11 – 15 million (2006) After Expansion No measurable impact
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 44
LPS Aviation Report
Business Case - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul 5,500 ft runway expansion ($14.9m No quantifiable benefits Cost-benefit + increased operating costs) Analysis 5,000 ft runway expansion ($12.7m No quantifiable benefits + increased operating costs) Modest Apron Expansion + New Parking + Fuel Fees Electrical upgrades ($1.7m.) Safety and Level of Service
Summary Increased Revenues to City None-Land sales by developer Business Case Tax benefits to government Residential Land taxes only Agenda Item#6a) (for 5,500 ft. or Increased Employment None permanent 5,000 ft. runway Impact on GDP Marginal expansion) Page 117 of177 Internal rate of return (IRR) Not applicable Net present value (NPV) Not applicable
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 45
LPS Aviation Report
Best Strategy for the City? - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Open discussion of feasibility, impact, costs and return of option
1. 5,500 ft. Runway – medium/large corporate jet 2. 5,000 ft. Runway – small corporate jet 3. Modest Improvements – small turboprops
4. Status Quo Agenda Item#6a)
A positive Business Case for the City of Wetaskiwin Page 118 of177 to invest in Expansion Options 1 or 2 can not be developed.
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 46
LPS Aviation Report
Discussion - Presented byAlderman MarkMcFaul
Agenda Item#6a) Page 119 of177
March 1, 2012 Aviation Planning and Management Consulting 47
Agenda Item # 7a)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Department Al Steckler, Manager Representative: of Finance
Alderman Presented By: Patricia MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
In order to inform Council of the financial position of the City in Issue / relation to the 2012 Operating and Capital Budgets financial reports Request have been prepared to April 30, 2012.
Comparative statements of actual to budget for revenues and expenditures are presented in summary format and cost centre format, along with progress reports on capital and operating Executive projects and the current status on debt service. Summary
A review of these statements indicate that overall the City is on budget as of April 30, 2012.
(I Move) That City Council receive the financial report as presented Motion Proposed for the period ending April 30, 2012 By Administration
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
Strategic Plan N/A Action Items
Municipal Plans N/A
Policies N/A and Bylaws
Other Legislation N/A or Agreements
1 | P a g e
Monthly Financial Report - Presented By: Alderman Patricia Page 120 of 177 MacQuarrie Agenda Item # 7a)
Financial The financial report to April 30, 2012 confirms that overall the City Implications is on budget.
Next Steps N/A
Communication N/A Strategy
1. --- Alternate Options
Department Head AS
City Manager Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
Monthly Financial Report - Presented By: Alderman Patricia Page 121 of 177 MacQuarrie MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin Funding Statement of Revenue and Expenditures
For the Year 2012 FORECASTED 2012 2012 ACTUAL BUDGET 2012 FORECAST BUDGET BUDGET TO DATE VARIANCE % T0 DATE TO YEAR-END VARIANCE REVENUE: - Presented By: Alderman Patricia . Taxes (10,932,736) (10,989,322) 56,586 100.52% (10,932,736) Grants-In-Lieu Of Taxes (178,610) (186,015) 7,405 104.15% (178,610) Sales To Other Governments (368,172) (22,756) (345,416) 6.18% (368,172) Sales Of Goods And Services (6,847,205) (2,735,445) (4,111,760) 39.95% (6,847,205) Other Revenues From Own Sources (3,267,657) (1,248,218) (2,019,439) 38.20% (3,267,657) Conditional Grants (1,102,853) (184,666) (918,187) 16.74% (1,102,853) Other Transactions (2,931,317) (816,654) (2,114,663) 27.86% (2,931,317)
TOTAL REVENUE (25,628,550) (16,183,075) (9,445,475) 63.14% (25,628,550) 0
EXPENSES:
Salaries, Wages, And Benefits 8,951,511 2,999,983 5,951,528 33.51% 8,951,511 General and Contracted Services 2,706,373 950,004 1,756,369 35.10% 2,706,373 Contracted Repairs and Maintenance 613,850 180,882 432,968 29.47% 613,850 Purchases From Other Governments 2,066,946 520,769 1,546,177 25.20% 2,066,946
Materials, Goods and Supplies 1,863,351 556,268 1,307,083 29.85% 1,863,351 Agenda Item # 7a) Utilities 1,740,550 616,266 1,124,284 35.41% 1,740,550 Transfer Payments 2,175,003 125,406 2,049,597 5.77% 2,175,003 Financial Service Charges 2,092,093 488,770 1,603,323 23.36% 2,092,093 Other Transactions 2,953,780 864,388 2,089,392 29.26% 2,953,780 0 Page 122 of 177 TOTAL EXPENSES 25,163,457 7,302,737 17,860,720 29.02% 25,163,457 0
NET SURPLUS (465,093) (8,880,338) 8,415,245 (465,093) 0
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin - Summary of 2012 Funded Operating Budget For the period ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue % Expense Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance Acct # Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance
(13,098,810) (11,699,789) 89% (1,399,021) 0001 Nonfunctional - 0 - - Presented By: Alderman Patricia
- 100% - 1101 Legislative 419,921 136,084 32% 283,837 (3,000) (3,000) 100% - 1201 Civic Bnuilding 96,296 31,959 33% 64,337 (35,880) (11,960) 33% (23,920) 1202 New City Hall Building 480,757 103,962 22% 376,795 100% - 1211 City Manager 694,178 259,882 37% 434,296 (766,930) (261,022) 34% (505,908) 1213 Financial Services 603,629 205,910 34% 397,719 (1,725) (1,538) 89% (187) 1214 Assessment Services 211,338 96,926 46% 114,412 100% - 1216 Information Services 446,887 242,101 54% 204,786 (87,000) (84,865) 98% (2,135) 1219 Business Licensing 1,300 0% 1,300 100% - 1220 Telephone Administration - 100% - (894,535) (362,385) 41% (532,150) Total General Government 2,954,306 1,076,825 36% 1,877,481
(682,280) (115,553) 17% (566,727) 2101 Police Protection 2,532,324 676,814 27% 1,855,510 (183,488) (37,636) 21% (145,852) 2105 RCMP New Depot 441,245 193,440 44% 247,805 (57,750) (975) 2% (56,775) 2301 Fire Protection 691,604 245,158 35% 446,446 100% - 2302 New Fire Station Buildings 200,727 21,657 11% 179,070 100% - 2401 Disaster Services 36,689 10,328 28% 26,361 (68,000) 0 0% (68,000) 2501 Safety Services 152,274 47,281 31% 104,993 Agenda Item # 7a) (15,000) (223) 1% (14,777) 2601 Bylaw Nuisance Properties (11,000) 176 -2% (11,176) (4,000) (671) 17% (3,329) 2603 Downtown Parking Authority - 0 100% - (300,000) (105,255) 35% (194,745) 2610 Photo Radar 220,000 88,216 40% 131,784 (10,750) (1,964) 18% (8,786) 2611 Bylaw Enforcement 205,260 68,398 33% 136,862 (105,250) (93,723) 89% (11,527) 2612 Building Inspection 229,130 136,440 60% 92,690 Page 123 of 177 (10,000) (3,780) 38% (6,220) 2613 Animal Control 96,373 28,451 30% 67,922 (1,436,518) (359,780) 25% (1,076,738) Total Protective Services 4,794,626 1,516,358 32% 3,278,268
- - 3101 Public Works Superintendent 184,098 63,861 35% 120,237 (1,000) 0% (1,000) 3111 Engineering Administration 203,276 57,458 28% 145,818 (1,387,683) (368,572) 27% (1,019,111) 3113 Equipment Pool 1,387,683 299,871 22% 1,087,812 - - 3115 Workshops/Yards 143,791 58,629 41% 85,162
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin - Summary of 2012 Funded Operating Budget For the period ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue % Expense Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance Acct # Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance (142,780) (48,910) 34% (93,870) 3201 Roadway Maintenance 575,446 129,355 22% 446,091
- - 100% - 3202 Sidewalk Maintenance 108,358 5,358 5% 103,000 Presented By: Alderman Patricia - 100% - 3203 Street Cleaning 107,852 44,239 41% 63,613 - 100% - 3204 Snow Removal - Roads & Sidewalks 588,473 119,238 20% 469,235 (43,119) 0% (43,119) 3206 Public Transportation 99,270 54,746 55% 44,524 - 100% - 3207 Traffic Signals/Lights 605,309 184,218 30% 421,091 - 100% - 3209 Crack Sealing/Minor Road Maintenance 103,000 93 0% 102,907 - 100% - 3211 Fence Repair-CPR 5,759 739 13% 5,020 (6,915) (2,310) 33% (4,605) 3301 Airport General 69,452 16,899 24% 52,553 - 100% - 3302 Airport Airside Maintenance 74,364 19,281 26% 55,083 - 100% - 3304 Airport Building Maintenance 29,952 21,970 73% 7,982 - 100% - 3305 Airport Runway/Road Maintenance 33,562 9,382 28% 24,180 - 100% - 3701 Storm Sewers - Drainage 68,090 10,544 15% 57,546 (6,124) 0% (6,124) 3724 Drainage Ditches 75,706 4,967 7% 70,739 (1,587,621) (419,791) 26% (1,167,830) Total Transportation 4,463,441 1,100,850 25% 3,362,591
(19,000) (16,729) 88% (2,271) 4101 Water - Collection 32,800 1,777 5% 31,023 - 100% - 4102 Water Treatment 1,700,314 667,284 39% 1,033,030 - 100% - 4109 Water Break Repairs 176,625 8,991 5% 167,634
(3,822,986) (1,554,109) 41% (2,268,877) 4110 Water Supply 1,877,958 447,791 24% 1,430,167 Agenda Item # 7a) (12,000) 0% (12,000) 4201 Sewer - Collection 18,100 759 4% 17,341 (1,328,800) (529,298) 40% (799,502) 4202 Sewer - Blowerhouse 712,667 179,080 25% 533,587 - 100% - 4203 Sewer - Lift Stations 498,107 162,991 33% 335,116 - 100% - 4209 Sewer Break Repairs 118,027 13,496 11% 104,531 (910,000) (382,608) 42% (527,392) 4301 Garbage Collection 540,743 155,251 29% 385,492 Page 124 of 177 (736,000) (197,569) 27% (538,431) 4302 Sanitary Landfill 907,923 188,449 21% 719,474 (124,922) (54,544) 44% (70,378) 4303 Recycling 322,256 92,311 29% 229,945 (30,120) 0% (30,120) 4304 Landfill/Recycling Buildings 28,121 7,631 27% 20,490 - 100% - 4305 Garbage/Recyclables City Facilities 25,160 2,102 8% 23,058 (6,983,828) (2,734,858) 39% (4,248,970) Total Environmental Health 6,958,801 1,927,912 28% 5,030,889
(42,269) (21,135) 50% (21,135) 5111 FCSS - Administration 52,836 17,313 33% 35,523
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin - Summary of 2012 Funded Operating Budget For the period ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue % Expense Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance Acct # Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance (79,833) (33,758) 42% (46,076) 5115 FCSS - Special Funding 99,791 43,867 44% 55,924
- (158,942) (68,965) 43% (89,977) 5116 FCSS - Homemakers 181,179 55,134 30% 126,045 Presented By: Alderman Patricia (69,926) (34,963) 50% (34,963) 5117 FCSS - Volunteer Centre 87,408 29,671 34% 57,737 - 100% - 5609 Old Cemetery Building 7,612 2,237 29% 5,375 - 100% - 5610 Memorial Cemetery Building 5,796 1,826 32% 3,970 (4,500) (1,550) 34% (2,950) 5611 Old Cemetery 48,630 3,940 8% 44,690 (61,900) (20,550) 33% (41,350) 5612 Memorial Cemetery 66,246 14,204 21% 52,042 (417,370) (180,920) 43% (236,450) Total Public Health 549,498 168,192 31% 381,306
- 0 100% - 6111 Economic Development 136,215 41,104 30% 95,111 - 100% - 6112 Tax Incentives 15,000 15,644 104% (644) (146,761) (109,170) 74% (37,591) 6113 JEDI Commercial Developments 146,760 8,072 5% 138,688 (57,800) 0% (57,800) 6114 Tourism/Marketing 180,247 37,095 21% 143,152 - (108) 100% 108 6115 City Communication 284,988 83,424 29% 201,564 - 100% - 6116 Chamber Building 21,121 6,138 29% 14,983 - 100% - 6201 Christmas/Carnivals 14,016 1,535 11% 12,481 - 100% - 6601 Land Fund - 100% - (1,379) (1,448) 105% 69 6902 Agricultural Rentals - - (205,940) (110,726) 54% (95,214) Total Planning/Development 798,347 193,012 24% 605,335
Agenda Item # 7a) (15,000) 0% (15,000) 7112 Recreation Administration 150,259 49,317 33% 100,943 (8,000) 0% (8,000) 7207 Peace Hills Park 21,707 488 2% 21,219 - 100% - 7208 By-The-Lake Park Building 70,329 23,053 33% 47,276 (10,000) (5,659) 57% (4,341) 7209 By-The-Lake Park 31,874 7,833 25% 24,041 (310,000) (77,443) 25% (232,557) 7210 Aboussafy Centre-Programs 517,637 173,042 33% 344,595 Page 125 of 177 - 100% - 7211 Aboussafy Centre 745,250 75,806 10% 669,444 (279,050) (114,713) 41% (164,337) 7213 Civic Arena 784,488 324,333 41% 460,155 (19,000) (13) 0% (18,987) 7215 Recreation Grounds 178,216 26,818 15% 151,398 (8,800) (20) 0% (8,780) 7216 Parks 598,171 143,364 24% 454,807 - 100% - 7217 Playgrounds 60,081 10,003 17% 50,078 (32,000) (44,280) 138% 12,280 7218 Curling Rink & Arts & Crafts 124,196 46,843 38% 77,353 (34,000) (17,897) 53% (16,103) 7219 Drill Hall 100,687 27,977 28% 72,710
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin - Summary of 2012 Funded Operating Budget For the period ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue % Expense Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance Acct # Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Variance (22,500) (1,670) 7% (20,830) 7221 Recreation Programs 92,020 6,038 7% 85,982
- - 100% - 7410 Library Building 145,604 90,044 62% 55,560 Presented By: Alderman Patricia (18,000) (18,000) 7411 Memorial Centre 51,570 18,258 35% 33,312 (90,059) (10,769) 12% (79,290) 7412 Library Operating 455,189 148,997 33% 306,192 (5,000) (406) 8% (4,594) 7413 Archives 140,470 46,423 33% 94,047 (102,519) (41,954) 41% (60,565) 7415 Library Board 126,690 75,945 60% 50,745 (953,928) (314,825) 33% (639,103) Total Recreation/Culture 4,394,438 1,294,581 29% 3,099,857
(3,191,984) 100% 3,191,984 8001 ASFF Requisition 795,110 100% (795,110) (291,225) 100% 291,225 8002 St. Thomas Requisition 74,881 100% (74,881) (267,442) 100% 267,442 8005 Seniors Homes & Community Housing 133,595 100% (133,595) - (3,750,650) 100% 3,750,650 Total Requisitions - 1,003,586 100% (1,003,586)
(50,000) 0 0% (50,000) 9701 Operating Contingencies 250,000 25,007 10% 224,993 (50,000) 0 0% (50,000) Total Fiscal Services 250,000 25,007 10% 224,993 (25,628,550) (19,933,725) 78% (5,694,825) Total Revenues/Expenses 25,163,457 8,306,323 33% 16,857,134 Agenda Item # 7a) Page 126 of 177
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin Summary of 2012 Funded Project Budget
For the Period Ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue Expected % Expense Expected Status Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Proj.# Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Code Admin Projects - 100% - - 186 Council Public Relations Initiatives 11,000 10,990 100% - 10 C - 100% - 447 2012 City Census 25,000 0% 25,000 - Presented By: Alderman Patricia (26,500) (43,000) 162% 16,500 635 Municipal Intern Intern 30,000 835 3% 29,165 I (4,000) 0% (4,000) 637 Electronic Council - Phase 1 4,000 0% 4,000 (6,932) 0% (6,932) 638 Office Furniture - Mayor's Office & 2 Other Sets 6,932 0% 6,932 - 100% - 702 Council - Committee Training 10,000 0% 10,000 - 100% - 703 Management - Staff Training 10,000 0% 10,000 Archive & Records Management Projects (33,649) 0% - (33,649) 6 Records Management 33,649 8,400 25% - 25,249 I (67,500) 0% (67,500) 645 Archives - NADP 75,000 0% 75,000 - (1,675) 100% 1,675 669 ASA'S Strategic Grants Project - 114 100% (114) I - (4,624) 100% 4,624 714 NADP - Stan Reynolds - 100% - Communications Projects (35,647) 0% (35,647) 576 Branding Consultant 35,647 3,642 10% 32,005 I (2,500) 0% (2,500) 640 Graphic Design Panels 2,500 0% 2,500 (28,115) 0% (28,115) 641 Entrance Signs - Phase 1 58,115 (50,000) 0% (50,000) 642 Website 50,000 Community Events (79,157) 0% (79,157) 174 Wetaskiwin Air Show 100,000 3,290 3% 96,710 I (1,200) 0% (1,200) 316 Canada Day Celebration 9,430 0% 9,430 - 100% - 582 Pioneer Days 8,700 0% 8,700 Agenda Item # 7a) (34,462) (200) 1% (34,262) 647 Other Events - Facility Rentals 34,462 13,365 39% 21,097 I - 100% - 664 Arts And Ag Festival - 100% - Finance Projects (105,000) 0% (105,000) 704 New Municipal Software 146,000 48,449 33% 97,551 I (35,000) 0% (35,000) 705 Utility Life Cycle Accounting Plan & Policy 35,000 0% 35,000 Page 127 of 177 Development Projects (129,447) (130,135) 101% 688 507 Affordable Housing Initiative 129,447 130,135 101% (688) C (15,400) 0% (15,400) 563 ePad Development/Subdivision Software 15,400 9,105 59% 6,295 I (5,000) 0% (5,000) 626 Main Street District Overlay 5,000 0% 5,000 Economic Development Projects (68,046) 0% - (68,046) 91 Regional Economic Development-JEDI 140,166 140,166 27% - - C (34,282) (29,474) 86% (4,808) 512 Economic Development Initiative 34,282 37,702 0% (3,420) C (5,000) (250) 5% (4,750) 580 Tourism Initiative 5,000 0% 5,000
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin Summary of 2012 Funded Project Budget
For the Period Ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue Expected % Expense Expected Status Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Proj.# Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Code (15,000) 0% (15,000) 643 Tourism Guide 15,000 0% 15,000 - 100% - 694 First Impressions (FICE) - Accomodations 1,000 1,000 Information System Projects - Presented By: Alderman Patricia - 100% - 633 2 - HP Switches with Fibre Connections 15,000 0% 15,000 (31,308) 0% (31,308) 634 Phone System Upgrade 31,308 1,500 5% 29,808 C - 100% - 700 WIFI Access 10,000 10,000 - 100% - 701 4 - Panasonic Toughbook Laptops 10,500 10,104 396 C Bylaw Services Projects - (1,395) 100% 1,395 670 Bicycle Rodeo - 100% - C RCMP Projects (7,200) 0% (7,200) 699 RCMP Air Conditioning - Server Room 18,000 0% 18,000 Fire Department Projects (17,728) 100% 17,728 187 Rural Fire Remuneration - 17,657 100% (17,657) I - 100% - 232 AED For Public Works Building 2,500 2,269 91% 231 C (255,000) 0% - (255,000) 373 New Fire Truck 255,000 202,462 79% - 52,538 C - 100% - 627 Portable Digital Hand Held Radios & Chargers 7,000 0% 7,000 - 100% - 695 Fire Pro 2 - Records Management Software 5,000 4,870 97% 130 C (20,000) 0% (20,000) 696 CSE Equipment - Confined Space 20,000 1,175 6% 18,825 I (5,000) 0% (5,000) 697 Emergency Table Top Exercise 5,000 0% 5,000 - 100% - 698 Mutual Aidement Development w/ First Nations 5,000 0% 5,000 Library Projects - (3,857) 100% 3,857 509 Library CAP Projects - 6,130 100% - (6,130) I - 100% - 706 Seniors Homebound Book Project 15,000 8,206 55% 6,794 I (11,175) 100% 11,175 716 New Horizons for Seniors Program 100% - Recreation Projects Agenda Item # 7a) (18,491,000) (10,221,000) 55% - (8,270,000) 259 New Swimming Facility 18,491,000 1,149,059 6% - 17,341,941 I (75,000) 0% (75,000) 596 Recreation Master Plan 75,000 19,850 26% 55,150 I (12,400) 0% (12,400) 682 Parking Lot Lights at Curling Rink 23,000 0% 23,000 Airport Projects (12,000) 0% - (12,000) 60 Security & Access Fence & Gates 12,000 0% - 12,000
Page 128 of 177 (6,700) 0% (6,700) 560 2 Airport Threshold Lights 6,700 0% 6,700 (8,900) 0% (8,900) 562 Video Camera Surveillance Equipment 8,900 0% 8,900 (2,500) 0% (2,500) 624 Obstacle Limitation Surface Survey 2,500 0% 2,500 (100,000) 0% (100,000) 625 Taxiway Lighting 100,000 0% 100,000 (40,000) 0% (40,000) 671 Airport Equipment Storage Bldg 40,000 38,399 96% 1,601 C - 100% - 688 Emergency Response Plan - Exercise 17,500 1,250 7% 16,250 I - 100% - 689 Retro Reflector Replacements 3,000 2,585 86% 415 C - 100% - 690 Line Painting 8,000 0% 8,000 - 100% - 691 Taxiway/Airside Signage 2,200 1,520 69% 680 I
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin Summary of 2012 Funded Project Budget
For the Period Ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue Expected % Expense Expected Status Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Proj.# Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Code - 100% - 692 Runway Safety Area Survey 10,000 0% 10,000 - 100% - 693 Runway Extension Business Case Evaluation 47,000 44,957 96% 2,043 I PW Superintendent/Engineering Projects - Presented By: Alderman Patricia (28,342) 0% - (28,342) 32 General Engineering 28,342 0% - 28,342 - (2,717) 100% - 2,717 315 Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society - 2,787 100% - (2,787) I (120,000) 0% (120,000) 597 Transportation Master Plan 120,000 38,059 32% 81,941 I Public Works Other Facility Projects (27,629) 0% (27,629) 371 City Hall Fire Security System 27,629 4,386 16% 23,243 I (4,210) 0% (4,210) 559 Parkside Park Swing Set 4,210 0% 4,210 (8,600) 0% (8,600) 622 RCMP Building Water Tank (80 Tank) 11,700 0% 11,700 - 100% - 683 Airport Fie Alarm Panel & Upgrade Sensors 4,000 0% 4,000 - 100% - 684 PW Ceiling Hung Furnaces 7,000 0% 7,000 - 100% - 685 Replace Front Lift at Memorial Centre 13,000 0% 13,000 (37,000) 0% (37,000) 686 Roof Replacement NE Blower House 37,000 0% 37,000 (15,000) 0% (15,000) 687 Roof Replacement NE Lift Station 15,000 0% 15,000 Public Works Landfill Projects (25,000) 0% (25,000) 541 2 - 40 Yd Roll-off Bins 25,000 22,481 90% 2,519 C (1,044) 0% (1,044) 613 Wind Screens (3) 1,044 0% 1,044 (1,985,000) 0% (1,985,000) 614 Landfill Cell Expansion 1,985,000 51,481 3% 1,933,519 I (6,000) 0% (6,000) 681 Residential Garbage Containers 6,000 4,557 76% 1,444 I Public Works Paving & Underground Projects (4,026,400) 0% (4,026,400) 525 Main Street Rehabilitation 4,026,400 43,556 1% 3,982,844 I (50,000) 0% (50,000) 600 Road Construction - 53 ST: 43 Ave to 45 Ave 50,000 0% 50,000 (1,300,000) 0% (1,300,000) 601 Road Construction - 60 St: 40 Ave to 47 Ave 1,300,000 0% 1,300,000 (800,000) 0% (800,000) 673 Road Construction - 57 St 40 Ave to 43 Ave 800,000 23,903 3% 776,098 I Agenda Item # 7a) (10,000) 0% (10,000) 674 Lane Construction: Park Grove B of 56 Ave 10,000 0% 10,000 (40,000) 0% (40,000) 675 Intersection Upgrades 40,000 0% 40,000 Public Works Utility Project (60,000) (827,273) 1379% 767,273 205 NE Lagoon Upgrade & Dumping Pad 60,000 4,360 7% 55,640 I (250,000) 0% (250,000) 405 Automatic Meter Reading System 250,000 97,619 39% 152,381 I
Page 129 of 177 (39,245) 0% (39,245) 518 GM Reservoir Engineering Study 39,245 617 2% 38,629 I (20,000) 0% (20,000) 526 Standby Power Moesseson 20,000 0% 20,000 (35,000) 0% (35,000) 536 Paint NE Wetwells 35,000 28,846 82% 6,154 C (175,000) 0% (175,000) 538 2nd Transfer Pump Garden Meadows 175,000 0% 175,000 (10,000) 0% (10,000) 545 Pressure Control Valve Eastside 10,000 0% 10,000 (50,000) 0% (50,000) 608 Transmission Line - Upgrade 9 Air Relief Chambers 50,000 0% 50,000 (56,000) 0% (56,000) 609 WTP - New Boiler 56,000 1,500 3% 54,500 I (263,370) 0% (263,370) 610 WTP - Waste Stream Treatment Process 263,370 31,054 12% 232,316 I (38,500) 0% (38,500) 611 Water Conservation 38,500 0% 38,500
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
City of Wetaskiwin Summary of 2012 Funded Project Budget
For the Period Ending April 30, 2012 2012 Revenues 2012 Expenses % Revenue Expected % Expense Expected Status Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Proj.# Description Budget Y.T.D. To-date Year End Variance Code - 100% - 659 Iona Contract Bonding Costs - 8,297 100% (8,297) I - 100% - 662 NE Lift Station Insurance Repair - 136,954 100% (136,954) I (606,000) 0% (606,000) 676 Watermain Construction - 52 Ave: 46St to 47St 606,000 7,977 1% 598,024 I - Presented By: Alderman Patricia (320,000) 0% (320,000) 677 Watermain to Ball Diamonds from 52 Ave 320,000 14,470 5% 305,530 I (100,000) 0% (100,000) 678 Raw Water Storage - Wastestream 100,000 0% 100,000 (100,000) 0% (100,000) 679 Alum Storage & Treated Pump 100,000 38,994 39% 61,006 I (150,000) 0% (150,000) 680 Utilities Master Plan 150,000 0% 150,000 - 100% - 715 Land Purchase - SW1-4-23-4 - 33,228 100% (33,228) C Works and Parks (1,133,995) (138,547) 12% - (995,448) 30 Equipment Pool Purchases 1,133,995 580,631 51% 553,364 C (23,756) 0% (23,756) 382 Sacred Heart Practice Field 23,756 0% 23,756 (234,900) 0% (234,900) 413 Sand/Salt Shed 234,900 0% 234,900 (9,226) 0% (9,226) 463 Community Pride Program 19,226 194 1% 19,032 I (32,008,062) (11,433,051) 36% - (20,575,011) Total Projects 32,473,155 3,094,133 10% - 29,270,907 Agenda Item # 7a) Page 130 of 177
MacQuarrie Monthly Financial Report
CITY OF WETASKIWIN Summary of Debenture Debt Servicing
For the Period Ending April 30, 2012 2012 Actual 2012 Actual 2012 Actual Balance Average Budget Y.T.D. Budget Y.T.D. Budget Y.T.D. Due Interest Acct. Principal Principal Interest Interest Total Total Dec 31, 2012 Rate
New City Hall Building 1202 123,848 14,364 121,058 14,271 244,906 28,635 2,579,020 4.48% - Presented By: Alderman Patricia RCMP Building 2105 87,680 45,652 135,735 74,024 223,415 119,676 2,114,334 6.16% Fire Stations 2302 57,500 65,558 123,058 0 1,326,871 4.74% Road Maintenance 3201 56,107 7,235 51,104 6,362 107,211 13,597 718,323 4.87% Sidewalk Maintenance 3202 4,882 4,882 476 476 5,358 5,358 0 9.75% Airport 3301 590 292 562 285 1,152 576 11,385 4.75%
Drainage Ditches 3724 2,935 3,189 6,124 0 65,275 4.73% WaterTreatment Plant 4102 267,319 132,387 278,592 140,569 545,911 272,956 7,044,818 3.85% Water Supply 4110 22,721 4,742 16,021 374 38,742 5,117 371,511 4.06%
Sewer Blowerhouse 4202 72,483 16,457 42,874 1,605 115,357 18,061 1,340,263 3.08% Residential Containers 4301 54,419 1,792 56,211 0 0 4.38% Sanitary Landfill 4302 196,590 9,645 12,564 1,554 209,154 11,200 247,670 2.83% JEDI 6113 9,960 4,926 6,184 3,145 16,144 8,072 134,986 4.34% Aboussafy Centre 7211 13,678 5,278 18,956 0 48,412 8.50% New Aquativ Centre 7212 132,181 175,477 307,658 8,140,185 3.33% Recreation 7215 24,066 27,670 51,736 0 652,830 4.12% Agenda Item # 7a) Total Debt Service 1,126,959 240,583 944,134 242,665 2,071,093 483,248 24,795,883 3.99% Page 131 of 177
Agenda Item # 7b)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012
Department Therese Myndio, Representative: Assistant City Manager
Alderman Presented By: Glenn Ruecker
Department Reports
The following department reports are presented to Council for information.
Issue a) Royal Canadian Mounted Police b) Wetaskiwin Emergency Services
Motion Proposed (I Move) That Council receive the department reports as information. By Administration
Background
Administration Comments
City Manager TG Approval Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
1 | P a g e
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 132 of 177 Agenda Item # 7b)
Meeting Date May 28, 2012
Status Period January 2012 – May 2012
Issued to City Council
Presented By Inspector Scott TOD
Highlights & Summary of Items
CRIME TRENDS: No significant crime trends observed. April 2012 had significantly less offences than April 2011 Year to Date offences (2011 vs. 2012) are comparable.
INITIATIVES: Property Crime Investigator/Coordinator Curfew Checks Increased frequency of “Check Stops”. Seventeen conducted since April 2012 – 14 within City of Wetaskiwin. Resulted in seven (7) charges of Impaired Driving. Increased foot patrols in downtown core and south end of City. Twelve conducted since April 2012. Wetaskiwin’s Most Wanted and Crime Beat initiated in May 2012.
RESOURCES: Outgoing Transfers: Cst. Kirkman to St. Albert Detachment Cst. Wade to Strathmore Detachment Cst. Kark to Faust Detachment S/Sgt. Rhodes to Sylvan Lake Detachment.
Incoming Transfers: (no Cadets) Cst. Tang from Airdrie Detachment Cst. Marchand from Red Deer Detachment Cst. McGilvary from Strathmore Detachment Vancant S/Sgt position to be filled through competition.
Vacancies: One municipal position as a result of resignation. Anticipate two (2) members off on Maternity Leave in 2012 through 2013. Three additional members being sought to fill vacancy and backfill anticipated Maternity Leaves.
PAGE 1 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN RCMP REPORT TO COUNCIL
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 133 of 177 Agenda Item # 7b)
Planned Actual Strategic Plan Comment/Explanation of Variance Completion Completion N/A at this time Department Statistics
PAGE 2 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN RCMP REPORT TO COUNCIL
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 134 of 177 Agenda Item # 7b)
Meeting Date May 28, 2012
Status Period January 2012 – May 2012
Issued to City Council
Merlin Klassen, Manager of Presented By Protective Services / Fire Chief
Highlights & Summary of Items Completed Since Last Report . Bylaw Services Bylaw services responded to 350 requests for service to the end of April. These responses are divided into four distinct reporting areas; Animal control and protection, Traffic Safety, City Bylaws, and Community events and assists. The Community Peace Officers (CPO) continue to make daily patrols of the City to ensure the highest level of safety compliance is achieved. The bylaw department has completed the upgrade requirements of their reporting software system. This is now a web based program and allows for more efficient mobile operations. Worked closely with the public works department to develop an effective system to monitor and maintain requirement with residential refuse containers . Emergency Management There have been 2 emergency management agency meetings this reporting period. A training matrix has been developed that will see all members achieve training in the areas of their responsibility with in the Municipal Emergency Response Plan. Several members of the agency have completed the Basic Emergency Management course and the Incident Command 100 course. . Fire Department The Fire Department responded to 69 emergency calls. This is comparable to the call volume of 2011. Of note is a reduction in the number of false alarm calls and repeat alarm calls. This has been reduced 44 % and 70% respectively from 2011 and is largely due to the increased awareness from property owners on the maintenance and testing requirements of their systems. Fire prevention and public education activities continue to increase. To date the fire department has attended at 16 public education events. Over 40 fire inspections have been completed to date which represents a 25% increase over 2011 numbers. Ice Rescue training has been completed and the fire department has the ability to respond to ice and water emergencies in the City. Cross training with Bylaw services and Peace Hills EMS has also been completed. Placed a new rescue pumper in service. This new piece of apparatus has the capabilities of a pumper trucks as well as having the capabilities of a rescue truck. Pumper 3 has increased the response service levels to the City.
PAGE 1 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN FIRE SERVICES REPORT TO COUNCIL
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 135 of 177 Agenda Item # 7b)
. Safety Services The health and safety department completed the initial testing and requirements for the hearing protection program. This has increase the level of protection for those employees who are exposed excessive noise levels as well as meeting the legislated requirements under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Training sessions on workplace inspections, hazard identification, and Occupational Health and Safety Act and regulations were provided to employees in March and April. Over 65 workers attended these courses. Planned Activities for Next Reporting Period . Bylaw Services Bike Rodeos are planned for two schools this May and June. Several local businesses have donated prizes for the kids which will enhance this program greatly. During the summer months of June till September Bylaw Services will be increase their presence within the community with extended hours of operation. Community Peace Officers will be available to answer requests for service Monday to Friday from 8 am. – 8 pm. and on Saturdays from 8 am – 4:30 pm. Bylaw services will be running a pilot program to test the effectiveness of “on-line” reporting and requests for service. Starting in June a link to this feature will be available on the City’s web page. The pilot program will run for a 3 month period. . Emergency Management A training session has been planned to review and test the set-up and operations of the Emergency Operations Centre. This will enable the department to evaluate the EOC as well as any training requirements for staff and assist with achieving a high level of preparedness for the community. The Emergency Management department is working closely with the airport in planning and developing a full scale exercise. The exercise will not only meet legislated requirements for the airport but will assist in testing the emergency response plans for the Airport, the City and several other critical services within the City. . Fire Department The fire department will be recruiting during the month of May. The hope is to hire up to 8 new members with their initial training completed by the end of June The firefighters will be completing their final evaluations for NFPA 1001 level 2 firefighter certifications by mid-June. Confined space rescue team training will begin in September. This specialized rescue training, when completed, will ensure that the City is in compliance with the Occupational Health and Safety Act for confined spaces. The fire department will be hosting a Hose Competition for county area fire departments. Initial planning is in progress for the fire department’s “Fire Cadet” program with an implementation date of 2013
PAGE 2 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN FIRE SERVICES REPORT TO COUNCIL
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 136 of 177 Agenda Item # 7b)
. Health and Safety Department A recognition BBQ event for all staff is planned for early May. Completion and implementation of H/S policy and procedure manual will be achieved by September.
Ac tu al Co Strategic Plan Planned Completion Comment/Explanation of Variance m pl eti on Implement on line reporting for 2012-04 complaints Department Review 2012-04
Action Items . Implementation of Health and Safety Program policy and procedure manual – In service date of September 2012 . Implementation of Confined space rescue capabilities for City employees – Rescue team in service date of mid-October 2012
Department Statistics See Attached
PAGE 3 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN FIRE SERVICES REPORT TO COUNCIL
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 137 of 177 Agenda Item # 7b)
Fire Department Statistics – April 2012
Total Call Volume
PAGE 4 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN FIRE SERVICES REPORT TO COUNCIL
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 138 of 177 Agenda Item # 7b)
Bylaw Services Statistics – April 2012
Total Requests for Service
Requests for Service by Type
Health and Safety Statistics – April 2012
PAGE 5 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN FIRE SERVICES REPORT TO COUNCIL
Department Reports - Presented by Alderman Glenn Ruecker Page 139 of 177 Agenda Item # 8a)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Department Therese Myndio, Representative: Assistant City Manager
Alderman Presented By: Dale Crabtree Committee Report
Members of City Council sit on many boards and committees as City representatives. Reports from these committees are brought forward Issue to the rest of Council for information.
Executive A report from Mayor Bill Elliot on the May 17 JEDI Board meeting is Summary attached for Council information.
Motion Proposed (I Move) That City Council receive the report from the May 17 JEDI By Administration Board meeting as information.
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
Strategic Plan N/A Action Items
Municipal Plans N/A
Policies N/A and Bylaws
Other Legislation N/A or Agreements
Financial The proposed action is in compliance with the 2012 Municipal Budget. Implications
1 | P a g e
Commitee Report - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 140 of 177 Agenda Item # 8a)
Reports from committee and board meetings that members of Council Next Steps sit on as City representatives will be brought forward as information to the rest of Council.
Communication Council will receive reports on a monthly basis as they are provided. Strategy
1. --- Alternate Options
Department Head TG
City Manager Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
Commitee Report - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 141 of 177 Agenda Item # 8a)
Meeting Date May 28, 2012 Committee/ JEDI Board Meeting May 17, 2012 Conference Issued to City Council
Presented By Mayor Bill Elliot
Highlights & Summary A regular board meeting of the Joint Economic Development Initiative (JEDI) was held at 4:30pm, Thursday, May 17, 2012 in the County office. Alderman Joe Branco and I attended on behalf of the City, along with City Manager Ted Gillespie, and Municipal Intern, Kinni Sandhar. The meeting agenda is attached. The full agenda package is available if anyone would like a copy.
Meeting highlights included. . A presentation of the 2011 Auditors Report – which will be presented at the annual meeting for approval. . Amendment to the Per Diem Mileage rate policy – to $0.50/km, for Board member travel. . Acceptance of Letter of resignation from Rick Hornecastle. . Approval of process for advertising, and selection of a new JEDI manager. . Presentation of final Revenue Sharing numbers for 2011 – Attached. . Review of the JEDI Managers Report. Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
PAGE 1 HELPING TO CREATE A SAFE, STRONG & PROUD COMMUNITY CITY OF WETASKIWIN ALDERMAN REPORT TO COUNCIL
Commitee Report - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 142 of 177 Agenda Item # 8a)
JEDI Regular Board Meeting - May 17, 2012 Thursday, May 17, 2012 Start time 4:30 PM County of Wetaskiwin Administrative Building
JEDI Regular Board Meeting - May 17, 2012 AGENDA
1. ATTENDANCE 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4.1 JEDI REGULAR BOARD MEETING APRIL 26, 2012 (2012/04/26)
5. DELEGATIONS
5.1 20120507001 - THE SOCIETY FOR JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES (JEDI) 2011 AUDITORS' REPORT Daniel Luymes - BDO Canada LLP Summary: The Society for Joint Economic Development Initiative 2011 Auditors' Report
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
6.1 20120507007 - BOARD MEETING PER DIEMS Jiselle Sears Summary: Board Meeting Per Diems
7. NEW BUSINESS
7.1 20120514001 - LETTER OF RESIGNATION - RICHARD HORNCASTLE Jiselle Sears Summary: Letter of Resignation - Richard Horncastle
7.2 20120514002 - POSITION FOR THE DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Jiselle Sears Summary: Position for the Director of Economic Development
Page 1 of 2
Commitee Report - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 143 of 177 Agenda Item # 8a)
7.3 20120507004 - 2011 REVENUE SHARING Jiselle Sears Summary: 2011 Revenue Sharing
8. REPORTS
8.1 20120507010 - MAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST REPORT Jiselle Sears Summary: May Economic Development Specialist Report
9. INFORMATION ITEMS 10. NEXT MEETING 11. ADJOURN
Page 2 of 2
Commitee Report - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 144 of 177 Commitee Report - Presented byAlderman DaleCrabtree MASTER AGREEMENT 2011 Revenue Allocation Summary
Shared Revenue City Portion Town portion County Portion City of Wetaskiwin $55,640.93 $26,763.29 $4,729.48 $24,148.16 Town of Millet $7,527.18 $3,620.57 $639.81 $3,266.79 County of Wetaskiwin $51,441.59 $24,743.40 $4,372.53 $22,325.65 Agenda Item#8a) Page 145 of177
Commitee Report JEDI Industrial Parcel Summary for the Town of Millet 2011 Tax Year
- Presented byAlderman DaleCrabtree REVENUE JEDI Municipal Mill Roll # Legal Owner Description Tax Revenue Assessment Rate 100200 NE-29-47-24-4 Norex land $762,400 9.873 $7,527.18 9.873 $0.00 9.873 $0.00 9.873 $0.00 9.873 $0.00 Total Tax Revenue $7,527.18
EXPENDITURES Roll # Legal Owner Total No expenditures $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures $0.00 Agenda Item#8a) TOTAL REVENUE SHARED ALLOCATION $7,527.18 Page 146 of177
Commitee Report JEDI Industrial Parcel Summary for the City of Wetaskiwin 2011 Tax Year
REVENUE - Presented byAlderman DaleCrabtree JEDI Municipal Mill Roll # Legal Owner Description Tax Revenue Assessment Rate
380290 P7821171 L55 Annugas land & impts $505,540 18.0315 $9,115.64 380480 P0023675 L1 Speth land & impts $1,237,330 18.0315 $22,310.92 390370 P9423560 B1 L1 AB. Highway Ser. land & impts $583,750 18.0315 $10,525.89 380190 P7821171 L53 Peace Hills Bldg. land & impts $397,050 18.0315 $7,159.41 390390 P9423560 B2 L1 Spirit Pipline land & impts $424,660 18.0315 $7,657.26 202030 P7823179 B21A L35 Midwest Propane land & impts $418,480 18.0315 $7,545.82 380540 P0125179 B1 L1 CO-OP impts $335,250 18.0315 $6,045.06 202150 P8820259 B24 L 13 Curtis Collison land & impts $111,700 18.0315 $2,014.12 380280 P7821171 B54 L 5 Masco Steel impts $135,310 18.0315 $2,439.84 Total Tax Revenue $72,374.11
EXPENDITURES Roll # Legal Owner Total 380480 P0023675 L1 SpethWater line $16,733.19 Agenda Item#8a)
Total Expenditures $16,733.19
TOTAL REVENUE SHARED ALLOCATION $55,640.93 Page 147 of177
Commitee Report JEDI Industrial Parcel Summary for the County of Wetaskiwin 2011 Tax Year
- Presented byAlderman DaleCrabtree REVENUE JEDI Municipal Mill Roll # Legal Owner Description Tax Revenue Assessment Rate 27200 SW 27-46-22-W5 Ace impt addtn only $523,410 12.72 $6,657.78 62502 NW 18-45-23-W4 TDC Rig Man. land & impts $215,420 12.72 $2,740.14 134400 SW 33-47-24-4 Railside Ind. Park land only $1,783,950 12.72 $22,691.84 134300 SE 33-47-24-4 Railside Ind. Park land only $655,790 12.72 $8,341.65 81801 SE 33-46-23-4 J. Irizar & Co. Ltd. land & impts $340,490 12.72 $4,331.03 294301 NW 10-46-1-5 I. Goodon Ind. land & impts $525,090 12.72 $6,679.14 Total Tax Revenue $51,441.59
EXPENDITURES Roll # Legal Owner Total No expenditures $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $0.00
Expenditures Agenda Item#8a)
TOTAL REVENUE SHARED ALLOCATION $51,441.59 Page 148 of177
Commitee Report JEDI Industrial Parcel Expenditure Summary for the City of Wetaskiwin 2011 Tax Year
- Presented byAlderman DaleCrabtree Roll # 380480 Legal P0023675 L1 Owner Speth 2007 $0.00 2008 $14,483.73 2009 $16,093.77 2010 $15,969.88 2011 $16,277.71 Total $62,825.09 Agenda Item#8a) Page 149 of177
Agenda Item # 12a)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Department Therese Myndio, Representative: Assistant City Manager
Alderman Presented By: Barry Hawkes Request for Road Closure
Slick’s Motorsports Bar and Grill Inc. are requesting that 50 Street between 46 and 47 Avenues be closed from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. in Issue / order to hold an Annual Show & Shine and BBQ in conjunction with Request Pioneer Days on Saturday, June 9, 2012. A copy of this letter is attached.
Section 9 of the Traffic Bylaw states that no person organizing, holding, leading or participating in a special event requiring a road closure, parade or procession shall engage in any conduct contrary to the conditions of the Permit issued by City Council in relation to that Parade or Procession, or which otherwise may reasonably be expected to create a risk of injury or harm to any other Person or to private or Executive public property. Summary
The Manager of Protective Services and the Public Works Superintendent were notified of this request. The only conditions noted were that the hydrants on the corners of 46 Avenue and 47 Avenue remain accessible to the fire department and that there are no impairments to their movements on 46 and 47 Avenues.
(I Move) That City Council authorize the road closure on 50 Street between 46 and 47 Avenues with the conditions that the hydrants on Motion Proposed the corners of 46 Avenue and 47 Avenue remain accessible to the fire By Administration department and that there be no impairments to their movements on 46 and 47 Avenues.
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
1 | P a g e
Request for Road Closure - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 150 of 177 Agenda Item # 12a)
Strategic Plan N\A Action Items
Municipal Plans N\A
Policies The proposed action is in compliance with the Traffic Bylaw #1781-11. and Bylaws
Other Legislation N/A or Agreements
Financial N/A Implications
A letter will be sent to Slick’s Motorsports Bar and Grill Inc. outlining Next Steps the conditions.
Communication All emergency service agencies will be notified of this closure. It will Strategy be the responsibility of the event holder to advertise the event.
1. --- Alternate Options
Department Head TG
City Manager Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
Request for Road Closure - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 151 of 177 Agenda Item # 12a)
Request for Road Closure - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 152 of 177 Agenda Item # 12b)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Allen Greene, Executive Director Representative: Wetaskiwin Chamber of Commerce
Alderman, Presented By: Joe Branco Pioneer Days
The Wetaskiwin and District Chamber of Commerce is finalizing plans for Pioneer Days for 2012.
Alan Greene, Executive Director for the Wetaskiwin and District Issue Chamber of Commerce is in attendance to give an update on Pioneer Days as well as discuss the road closures required for the Pioneer Days Parade.
Section 9 of the Traffic Bylaw states that no person organizing, holding, leading or participating in a special event requiring a road closure, parade or procession shall engage in any conduct contrary to the conditions of the Permit issued by City Council in relation to Executive that Parade or Procession, or which otherwise may reasonably be Summary expected to create a risk of injury or harm to any other Person or to private or public property.
The roads would be required to be closed from 10:30 until the end of the parade, approximately 12:30p.m.
(I Move) That City Council authorize the road closure on 50 Avenue Motion Proposed between 56 and 50 Street and 50 Street from 50 Avenue to 47 By Administration Avenue from 10:30 a.m. until the end of the parade.
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
1 | P a g e
Pioneer Days - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 153 of 177 Agenda Item # 12b)
Strategic Plan N/A. Action Items
Municipal Plans N/A.
Policies N/A. and Bylaws
Other Legislation N/A. or Agreements
Financial The proposed action is in compliance with the 2012 Municipal Budget. Implications
Next Steps N/A.
Communication N/A. Strategy
1. --- Alternate Options
Department Head TG
City Manager Comments
N/A.
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
Pioneer Days - Presented by Alderman Joe Branco Page 154 of 177 2011 Wetaskiwin Pioneer Days Parade Pioneer Days Saturday, June 9, 2012 Start Time: 11:00am
Parade Marshalling will begin at 9:30am. Please be here by 10:00am. See Parade Marshal located at corner of 50 ave and 53 st. Chamber Office ( Washrooms Available) - Presented byAlderman JoeBranco Portable toilets
Parade Route (Parade will head East along 50 ave to 47 st.) Dispersal Route (At the end of 50 ave, disperse either North or South along 47 st.DO NOT enter Recreation Grounds) 1st marshalling area to fill 2nd marshalling area to fill 3rd marshalling area to fill Marshalling area access route (access off of 53 stfrom 50 ave. See parade Marshal upon arrival)
Agenda Item#12b) Page 155 of177
Agenda Item # 12c)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Department Merlin Klassen, Representative: Fire Chief
Alderman Presented By: Dale Crabtree Weed Inspector Appointment
The City of Wetaskiwin has an agreement with the County of Wetaskiwin for weed inspection services within the City. Issue / Request The City must appoint Weed Inspectors to allow for inspections of properties within the community.
The Alberta Weed Control Act, requires local authorities to appoint inspectors to enforce and monitor compliance of the act and within the Executive municipality. The City has an agreement with the County for joint use Summary of a weed inspector. This appointment provides the inspector the authorities required under the act.
Motion Proposed (I Move) That City Council appoint Danielle Fredericksen as a By Administration municipal weed inspector for the City of Wetaskiwin
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Support, expand and diversify our economic base Strategic Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
Strategic Plan N/A Action Items
Municipal Plans N/A
Policies The proposed action is in compliance with Municipal Bylaw #1703-07 and Bylaws The Nuisance By-Law.
1 | P a g e
Weed Inspector Appointment - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 156 of 177 Agenda Item # 12c)
The proposed action is required by the Province of Alberta – Weed Control Act RSA W.-5.1 Other Legislation or Agreements The proposed action is in compliance with the weed inspection agreement held with the County of Wetaskiwin.
Financial The proposed action is in compliance with the 2012 Municipal Budget. Implications
Ms. Fredericksen will be appointed as a weed inspector for the City Next Steps of Wetaskiwin.
Communication The City communicates the requirements for property maintenance Strategy to all residents throughout the year.
Department Head MK
City Manager Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
Weed Inspector Appointment - Presented by Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 157 of 177 Agenda Item # 12d)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Department Merlin Klassen, Representative: Fire Chief
Alderman Presented By: Glenn Ruecker Director of Emergency Management
The Director of Emergency Management is a required position within all municipalities that must be appointed by municipal Council.
Issue It is recommended that Merlin Klassen, Fire Chief, assume the responsibilities of Director of Emergency Management.
The Alberta Emergency Management Act, and Municipal Bylaw 1737- 08 (Municipal Emergency Management Bylaw) require that the Director of Emergency Management be appointed by Council.
The Director of Emergency Management (DEM) is responsible to prepare and co-ordinate the Municipal Emergency Response plan and Executive co-ordinate all emergency operations, emergency services and other Summary resources used in an emergency.
This position was previously appointed to the City Manager position. With the importance of protective services in an emergency situation it has been determined that the position of Director of Emergency Management can be more appropriately handled through the Fire Chief position.
Motion Proposed (I Move) That City Council appoints Fire Chief, Merlin Klassen as the By Administration Director of Emergency Management for the City of Wetaskiwin.
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
Strategic Plan N/A Action Items
1 | P a g e
Director of Emergency Management - Presented by Alderman Glenn Page 158 of 177 Ruecker Agenda Item # 12d)
Municipal Plans N/A
Policies The proposed action is in compliance with Municipal Bylaw # 1737-08 and Bylaws Municipal Emergency Management Bylaw
Other Legislation The proposed action required by the Province of Alberta – Emergency or Agreements Management Act
Financial The proposed action is in compliance with the 2012 Municipal Budget. Implications
Chief Klassen will assume the responsibilities of Director of Emergency Next Steps Management.
Communication The City’s Emergency Management plan has an extensive Strategy communication plan in the event of an emergency situation.
Department Head MK
City Manager Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
Director of Emergency Management - Presented by Alderman Glenn Page 159 of 177 Ruecker Agenda Item # 12e)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Al Steckler, Manager of Finance Department and Representative: Byron King WCTS Transportation Co-ordinator
Alderman Presented By: Mark McFaul WCTS 2012 Deficit
In order to continue operating, the Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society (WCTS) requires additional funds from the Issue City.
In the report ‘Moving on’ previously presented to City Council it was concluded that the service provided by the WCTS is too valuable to the community to be lost.
Whereas the WCTS has expanded operations, increased revenues Executive and efficiencies, and reduced expenses, the service still operates at Summary a deficit.
During the 2012 budget preparations coverage of this deficit by the City was discussed but due to an oversight, left out of the final budget presented to Council. Attached is the 2012 revised forecast.
(I Move) That City Council authorize Administration to release Motion Proposed $50,000 to the Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society to By Administration offset its projected 2012 deficit with funding to come from the unspecified reserve.
Our vision is to create a Safe, Strong and Proud community Achieve organizational excellence Serve and protect our community Strategic Support, expand and diversify our economic base Plan Goals Be sustainable Increase pride and communication
1 | P a g e
Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society 2012 Deficit Page 160 of 177 Presented By - Alderman Mark McFaul Agenda Item # 12e)
Strategic Plan N/A Action Items
Municipal Plans N/A
Policies N/A and Bylaws
Other Legislation N/A or Agreements
Financial A reduction of $50,000 will be incurred from unspecified reserves Implications
Next Steps Develop the 2013 and 2014 budget with funding sources
Communication
Strategy
1. --- Alternate Options
Department Head AS
City Manager Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
2 | P a g e
Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society 2012 Deficit Page 161 of 177 Presented By - Alderman Mark McFaul Agenda Item # 12e)
Wetaskiwin Transit 2012 Financial Forecast (22 May 2012)
Revenue
2011 Carryover $ 5,000 City of Wetaskiwin (annual) $ 28,940 City of Wetaskiwin (Transportation Co-ordinator) $ 70,480 County of Wetaskiwin $ 10,000 Regular Fare Collection $ 75,000 CSS Fare Collection $ 68,000 Handi-van Advertising $ 5,500 CSS FTE/PDD $ 36,130 Annual Memberships $ 3,000
Total Revenue $302,050
Expenses
Transportation Coordinator $ 54,916 Dispatcher ($16/16.50/HR) $ 36,200 Drivers (@ $16) $127,000 Payroll Benefits $ 29,935 Staff Training $ 1,000 Rent $ 3,150 Office Supplies $ 2,000 2012 Audit $ 2,500 Insurance $ 11,500 Cell Phone $ 1,200 Telephone $ 720 Radio Licensing $ 1,500 Gas $ 36,100 Maintenance $ 44,329
Total Expenses $352,050
Forecasted Deficit ($50,000)
Wetaskiwin Community Transportation Society 2012 Deficit Page 162 of 177 Presented By - Alderman Mark McFaul Agenda Item # 13a)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012 Department Therese Myndio, Representative: Assistant City Manager
Alderman Presented By: Dale Crabtree
Council Schedule
Administration has provided a list of upcoming events for Council’s Issue information
Motion Proposed By Administration (I Move) That Council accept the Council schedule as information.
Background
Administration Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Approval Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
1 | P a g e
Council Schedule - Presented By: Alderman Dale Crabtree Page 163 of 177
COUNCIL SCHEDULE
Council Schedule MAY 28, 2012
DATE EVENT TIME LOCATION ATTENDING
May 28 Chamber of Commerce Luncheon 11:30 am Montgomery Glen Open to the Public
-
Presented By: Alderman Dale Crabtree May 28 Regular Council Meeting 4:00 - 6:00 pm Council Chambers Open to the Public
June 1 - 4 Federation of Canadian Municipalities Annual Conference and Trade Show - Saskatoon
June 5 Seniors Wellness Conference – Wetaskiwin Seniors Centre
June 8 - 10 Rawhide Rodeo Rodeo Grounds Open to the Public
June 9 Pioneer Days Parade
June 9 - 10 History Road Reynolds-Alberta Museum Open to the Public
June 11 Regular Council Meeting 4:00 - 6:00 pm Council Chambers Open to the Public
June 21 National Aboriginal Day 1:00 – 11:00 pm Maskwacis Bear Park Open to the Public
June 25 Chamber of Commerce Luncheon 11:30 am Open to the Public Montgomery Glen Agenda Item # 13a)
June 25 Regular Council Meeting 4:00 - 6:00 pm Council Chambers Open to the Public
Page 164 of 177 July 2 STAT – Canada Day – City Hall Closed
July 6 - 8 Ermineskin Cree Nation Powwow Maskwacis Bear Park Open to the Public
August 3 - 5 Samson Cree Nation Powwow Maskwacis Bear Park Open to the Public
Agenda Item # 14a)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012
Department Therese Myndio, Representative: Assistant City Manager
Alderman Presented By: Barry Hawkes
Administrative Action Sheet
Council is provided an Administrative Action Sheet once a month as a Issue report on the status of issues that have been directed by Council.
Motion Proposed (I Move) That Council accept the Administrative Action Sheet as By Administration information.
Background The Administrative Action Sheet is attached for Council Information.
Administration Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Signature Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
1 | P a g e
Administrative Action Sheet - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 165 of 177 Agenda Item # 14a)
Administrative Action Sheet
Date Reference Direction/Action Required Status
Initiated
That City Council authorize the Completed execution of an Employment Contract with City Manager Ted Gillespie, as reviewed during the in 2012-04-23 In 14-May-12 159/12 Camera meeting, to be effective May 15th, 2012.
That City Council approve Policy 6103 Processed and – Cash in Lieu of Parking Policy as Filed 14-May-12 158/12 amended.
That City Council approve Completed development permit application #12D049 for the purpose of constructing a 48’ x 240’ storage building on the north portion of the 14-May-12 157/12 parcel of land legally described as Plan 0123164, Lot 8 (6306 – 47 Avenue).
That City Council cancel the total tax Processed and levy for Roll 390070 (Knights of Filed Columbus) in accordance with the lease agreement dated July 22, 1996 14-May-12 156/12 given the authority of Section 347(1) of the Municipal Government Act.
That City Council cancel the total tax Processed and levy for Roll 360020 (Lion’s Filed 14-May-12 155/12 Campground).
Administrative Action Sheet - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 166 of 177 Agenda Item # 14a)
That City Council cancel the municipal Processed and portion of property taxes on Rolls Filed 14-May-12 154/12 210210 (the Moose Hall).
That City Council authorize the 2012 Processed and Development Contributions on Roll Filed 142090 in the amount of $857.41. 14-May-12 153/12
that City Council authorize Processed and Administration to enter into an Filed agreement with Knights Roofing Ltd. for the replacement of the Northeast 14-May-12 152/12 Lift Station and Blower buildings roofs for the sum of $52,597.00, not including GST.
That City Council authorize Processed and administration to enter into an Filed agreement with Federal Joint Sealing Co. of Canada Ltd for crack filling services at a cost of Seventy-six 14-May-12 151/12 thousand, six hundred and eighty dollars ($76,680.00) excluding GST.
That City Council give third and final Processed and reading to Bylaw 1792-12. Municipal Filed 14-May-12 150/12 Tax Rate Bylaw
That City Council give third and final Processed and reading to Bylaw 1791-12. Downtown Filed 14-May-12 148/12 Disrict Overlay
That City Council approve the Terms Completed of Reference for the Wetaskiwin 23-Apr-12 135/12 Memorial Fund Society as amended.
Administrative Action Sheet - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 167 of 177 Agenda Item # 14a)
That the City contribute $35,000 for In Progress the construction of 14 public parking stalls to provide 23-Apr-12 129/12 additional parking within Jubilee Park.
That City Council authorize In Progress Administration to enter into an agreement for the construction of a 23-Apr-12 128/12 parking area on the west end of Jubilee Park, in exchange for a band shell.
That Administration be directed to In Progress initiate an education campaign on 12-Mar-12 68/12 single use plastic bags for review by June 2012.
That City Council retain the used fire In Progress truck and investigate a funding strategy for retrofitting the vehicle for use in community functions to be 27-Feb-12 65/12 brought back for decision as a part of the 2013 budget process.
City Council direct administration to In Progress draft an amendment to Bylaw 1747- 09 – Land Use Bylaw to allow limited group homes as a discretionary use in 13-Feb-12 51/12 R1 and R2 designated areas of the City.
Administrative Action Sheet - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 168 of 177 Agenda Item # 14a)
That City Council direct administration In Progress to draft an amendment to Bylaw 1747- 09 – Land Use Bylaw to remove Section 8.3.3.3 which currently 13-Feb-12 50/12 requires a 76 metre radius between previously approved limited group homes.
Review of Recreation Facility fees and In Progress the Joint Use Agreement to be discussed at 2012 Strategic Planning 12-Dec-11 443/11 sessions.
In Progress
Administration directed to conduct a 11-Oct-11 346/11 review of information and directional signage within, and adjacent to the City, and that an Information and Directional sign policy be drafted for Council consideration with a target of completion by June 1, 2012 Administration authorized to draft a In Progress 27-Jun-11 241/11 Combative Sports Bylaw
That Administration start investigation In Progress and initial negotiations with the 26-Apr-11 163/11 province to raise the level of the dam at Coal Lake.
Administrative Action Sheet - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 169 of 177 Agenda Item # 14a)
That Adminiministration be directed In Progress to review Policy #1103, Council Remuneration and Expense Reimbursement and recommend 14-Feb-11 81/11 revisions to clarify the approval process for attending conferences and meetings.
UNESCO letter accepted by Council and Action Plan to be developed within the Wetaskiwin Tomorrow 8-Nov-10 245-10 Municipal Sustainability Plan
Administrative Action Sheet - Presented by Alderman Barry Hawkes Page 170 of 177 Agenda Item # 14b)
Meeting Date: May 28, 2012
Department Therese Myndio, Representative: Assistant City Manager
Alderman Presented By: Patricia Mac Quarrie
Correspondence
Administration has provided the following correspondence for Council Issue information.
Motion Proposed (I Move) That Council receive the correspondence as information. By Administration
Administration has received the following correspondence.
a) County of Wetaskiwin – Wetaskiwin Regional Aquatic Centre Background b) County of Wetaskiwin – Use of Off-Highway Vehicles
Correspondence is provided to Council for information.
Administration Comments
N/A
City Manager TG Sign Off Supporting Attached: On Request: N/A: Documents
1 | P a g e
Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie Page 171 of 177 Agenda Item # 14b)
Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie Page 172 of 177 Agenda Item # 14b)
Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie Page 173 of 177 Agenda Item # 14b)
Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie Page 174 of 177 Agenda Item # 14b)
Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie Page 175 of 177 Agenda Item # 14b)
Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie Page 176 of 177 Agenda Item # 14b)
Correspondence - Presented by Alderman Patricia Mac Quarrie Page 177 of 177