NPS Form 10-900-B OMB No
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1j49n53k No online items Guide to the George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165 Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1999 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the George E. Tillitson M0165 1 Collection on Railroads M0165 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: George E. Tillitson collection on railroads creator: Tillitson, George E. Identifier/Call Number: M0165 Physical Description: 50.5 Linear Feet(9 cartons and 99 manuscript storage boxes) Date (inclusive): 1880-1959 Abstract: Notes on the history of railroads in the United States and Canada. Conditions Governing Access The collection is open for research. Note that material is stored off-site and must be requested at least 36 hours in advance of intended use. Provenance Gift of George E. Tillitson, 1955. Special Notes One very useful feature of the material is further described in the two attached pages. This is the carefully annotated study of a good many of the important large railroads of the United States complete within their own files, these to be found within the official state of incorporation. Here will be included page references to the frequently huge number of small short-line roads that usually wound up by being “taken in” to the larger and expending Class II and I roads. Some of these files, such as the New York Central or the Pennsylvania Railroad are very big themselves. Michigan, Wisconsin, Oregon, and Washington are large because the many lumber railroads have been extensively studied out. -
The Geography of Texas
IMONDS H 2 is THE GEOGRAPHY OF TEXAS PHYSICAL AND POLITICAL BY FREDERIC WILLIAM SIMOXDS, Ph.D. I) PltOFE.SSOK OF GEOLOGY IX THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS REVISED EDITION The eduoattMl citizen should know the state in which he lives GINN AND COMPANY BOSTON • NEW YORK • CHICAGO • LONDON COPYRIGHT, 1905, 1914, BY FREDERIC WILLIAM SIMONDS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 514.5 JUN 17 r9i4 qrbc atftcngum jgregg GINN AND COMPANY* PRO- PRIETORS • BOSTON • U.S.A. ©C1.A376321 : PREFATORY NOTE ^ In the preparation of this text, which necessarily covers a somewhat varied field, I have, in general, been guided by the following works ON PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY The Reports of the Geological Survey of Texas, under the direction of E. T. Dumble, state geologist. Austin, 1890-1893. '' Notes on the Physical Geography of Texas," by Ralph S. Tarr. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia, August 29, 1893. " The Physical Geography of the Texas Region," by Robert T. Hill. Folio 3 of the Topographic Atlas of the United States. Wash- ington, United States Geological Survey, 1900. " Physical Geography, Geology, and Resources of Texas," by E. T. Dumble. Chapter IV, Volume 2, of A Comprehensive History of Texas, edited by Dudley G. Wooten. Dallas, William G. ScarfE, 1898. " The Geology of the Edwards Plateau and the Rio Grande Plain adjacent to Austin and San Antonio, Texas," by Robert T. Hill and T. Wayland Vaughan. Eighteenth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, Part II, pp. 193-321. Washington, 1898. " Geography and Geology of the Black and Grand Prairies, Texas," by Robert T. -
THE 1920S TEXAS KU KLUX KLAN REVISITED
THE 1920s TEXAS KU KLUX KLAN REVISITED: WHITE SUPREMACY AND STRUCTURAL POWER IN A RURAL COUNTY A Dissertation by KATHERINE KUEHLER WALTERS Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Carlos K. Blanton Co-Chair of Committee, Walter L. Buenger Committee Members, Wendy Leo Moore Sonia Hernandez Sarah McNamara Head of Department, David Vaught May 2018 Major Subject: History Copyright 2018 Katherine Kuehler Walters ABSTRACT The second Ku Klux Klan made its first public appearance in Texas at a United Confederate Veterans parade in October 1920, then quickly expanded across the state. Founder William J. Simmons created this organization as an exclusive, secretive fraternal group that both celebrated the original Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and responded to contemporary societal concerns of white native-born men and women in post-World- War-I America. Using a propaganda campaign, the organization preached the supremacy of a racialized Anglo-Saxon American identity, defined in terms of contemporary pseudo-scientific racial ideology as white, Protestant, native-born, and anti-radical, to recruit millions of members from across the nation within a few short years. Based on membership rolls and minutes of a Texas Klan chapter, this dissertation argues that, behind a façade of moral law and order, the Ku Klux Klan in rural Texas was a 1920s manifestation of a long-held racist ideology that utilized traditional practices of control through kinship, violence, and structural power to assert and protect white supremacy. -
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad ran from Galveston to Arcola, Duke, Sugar Land Junction [House], Thompsons [switch], Booth, Crabb, Richmond and Rosenberg. State HWY 38 ran from Alvin to Arcola, Trammells, DeWalt, amd ended at Sugar Land. It is now known as state HWY 6. The Houston Tap and Brazoria railroad, built beside the right of way of the Columbia Tap, was from Houston, past DUKE, to Brazoria and sold to International and Great Northern [ I&GN ] in 1871. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe started building in 1873 and opened in 1879 from Richmond to Galveston. A direct route from Richmond to Galveston would be closer to Rosharon, so a more accurate description of the chosen route is from Richmond to DUKE then DUKE to Galveston. These early train engines were steam, steam comes from water, and DUKE had the water from Clear Lake. There was a railroad water tower still standing at DUKE in 1970. The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad ran from Wharton to Kendleton, Beasley, Damon Junction and Rosenberg. The road from Rosenberg to Wharton was State HWY 12 and US 96 and is known today as US 59. The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad ran from Rosenberg, Dyer, Orchard and on to Sealy. The road from Rosenberg to Sealy is known today as State Hwy 36. The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company was chartered on May 28, 1873, to build a railroad from Galveston to the interior of Texas without passing through Houston. The projected route crossed the Brazos River near Columbia and ran through Caldwell, Cameron, and Belton on its way to the western boundary of Texas and its terminus at Santa Fe, New Mexico Territory. -
Cane Belt Branch of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company
q cane belt 10/8/04 1:58 PM Page 303 A History of the Cane Belt Branch of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company William S. Osborn* ailroad ing is a c apita l-a nd-h orsepower-in te nsive ind ustry, Rwhich may seem anachronistic in the age of the “information high- way.” The industry survives because there remains a need to transport heavy or bulky raw commodities with low value-to-weight ratios, a task often most efficiently accomplishe d by ra il. The twentieth cen tur y opened in the Southwest with a network of many small indepe ndent short-line railroads that connected to the trunklines of multi-state carri- ers; the Railroad Commission of Texas counted seventy-two common carriers active in the state in 1900. By mid-century, ownership of these lines had been greatly consolidated by the larger multi-state carriers in a pattern of conver gence th at con tinued until 1 9 8 0, when th e United States Congress passed the Staggers Rail Deregulation Act. By that time ther e were only thirty-one r ailr oa d companie s opera tin g in Te xas, including seven large ones and twenty-four smaller intrastate lines. But as the twentieth century draws to a close, the pendulum is swinging back toward a division of branch-line and trunk-line ownership as the larger carriers divest themselves of many of their smaller feeder line opera- tions. However, many of the Texas branch lines have not survived; total state wide trackage has declined from about 1 5,5 0 0 mile s in 1 9 5 0 t o about 12,700 miles in 1995.