DOCSLIB.ORG

Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad ran from Galveston to Arcola, Duke, Sugar Land Junction [House], Thompsons [switch], Booth, Crabb, Richmond and Rosenberg. State HWY 38 ran from Alvin to Arcola, Trammells, DeWalt, amd ended at Sugar Land. It is now known as state HWY 6. The Houston Tap and Brazoria railroad, built beside the right of way of the Columbia Tap, was from Houston, past DUKE, to Brazoria and sold to International and Great Northern [ I&GN ] in 1871. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe started building in 1873 and opened in 1879 from Richmond to Galveston. A direct route from Richmond to Galveston would be closer to Rosharon, so a more accurate description of the chosen route is from Richmond to DUKE then DUKE to Galveston. These early train engines were steam, steam comes from water, and DUKE had the water from Clear Lake. There was a railroad water tower still standing at DUKE in 1970. The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad ran from Wharton to Kendleton, Beasley, Damon Junction and Rosenberg. The road from Rosenberg to Wharton was State HWY 12 and US 96 and is known today as US 59. The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railroad ran from Rosenberg, Dyer, Orchard and on to Sealy. The road from Rosenberg to Sealy is known today as State Hwy 36. The Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company was chartered on May 28, 1873, to build a railroad from Galveston to the interior of Texas without passing through Houston. The projected route crossed the Brazos River near Columbia and ran through Caldwell, Cameron, and Belton on its way to the western boundary of Texas and its terminus at Santa Fe, New Mexico Territory. At Santa Fe the GC&SF planned to connect with the Denver and Rio Grande. The authorized capital stock was $2,000,000. Funds for the railroad were largely subscribed in Galveston, where the office was located. The first officers of the company included Albert Somerville, president; Moritz Kopperl, vice president; C. R. Hughes, secretary; George Sealyqv, treasurer; and Gen. Braxton Bragg, chief engineer. Bernard M. Temple served as Bragg's assistant. Construction began on May 1, 1875, but it was two years before the road reached Arcola and 1879 before the rails reached Richmond, sixty-three miles from Galveston. On April 15, 1879, Sealy, as trustee, purchased the GC&SF at foreclosure to satisfy a $250,000 deed of trust. Four days later Sealy and his associates reorganized the company under the original charter. The new organization resumed construction in early 1880 and by the end of 1881 had built 291 miles between Richmond and Fort Worth. An additional forty-eight miles was placed in service between Belton and Lampasas on May 1, 1882. In that year the company bought the Chicago, Texas and Mexican Central Railway Company, fifty-three miles between Cleburne and Dallas, as well as the Central and Montgomery Railway Company, twenty-three miles between Navasota and Montgomery. Several branch lines were also opened during this period, the most important being the twenty-five mile line between Alvin and Houston on May 1, 1883. The main line was extended in 1886, when the 132 miles between Lampasas and Ballinger was placed in operation. By the end of 1885 the GC&SF was operating nearly 700 miles of track, but it was not a financially strong railroad. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company had recently completed a route from Kansas to the Pacific Coast and was looking towards extending its operations south to the Gulf. In March 1886 Sealy and William B. Strong, president of the Santa Fe, reached an agreement whereby the larger company would purchase the GC&SF. However, the GC&SF was required to turn over 1,000 miles of track and had one year to construct a 171- mile line from Fort Worth to Purcell, Indian Territory, 111 miles between Dallas and Paris, and forty-two miles between Cleburne and Weatherford. The connection between the GC&SF and a Santa Fe subsidiary was made at Purcell on April 27, 1887. Although now also a subsidiary of the Santa Fe, the GC&SF continued to be operated as a separate organization. In 1888 the company completed a thirty-five mile extension from Ballinger to San Angelo, and the Texas, Louisiana and Eastern Railroad Company was bought at foreclosure on July 26, 1897. This line, running twenty-nine miles east from Conroe, was extended an additional fifty miles to Silsbee in 1902. A ninety-eight mile branch from Lometa to Eden was placed in service in 1911. In 1891 the promoters of Temple and railroad officials established the Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Hospital Association, and on March 2, 1892, a small hospital opened to serve railroad employees along the line from Galveston to Purcell, Oklahoma. On October 1, 1892, Dr. Arthur Carroll Scott moved to Temple to be chief surgeon of the Santa Fe Hospital (later the Scott and White Santa Fe Centerqv). By 1895 Scott had hired Raleigh R. White as a surgeon for the hospital, and both men worked as the railroad's chief surgeons by 1898. On December 12, 1895, the Santa Fe was reorganized as the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and subsequently acquired a number of railroads that were leased to the GC&SF for operation. In Texas these included the Gulf, Beaumont and Kansas City Railway between Beaumont and Roganville; the Gulf, Beaumont and Great Northern Railroad between Roganville and Center; and the Texas and Gulf Railway between Center and Longview. Other Santa Fe-owned railroads leased to the GC&SF were the Jasper and Eastern Railroad between Kirbyville and Oakdale, Louisiana, and the Gulf and Inter-State Railway of Texas between Beaumont and High Island with a ferry connection to Galveston. Outside of East Texas the GC&SF leased the Cane Belt Railroad between Sealy and Matagorda and the Concho, San Saba, and Llano Valley Railroad lines between Miles and Paint Rock and between San Angelo and Sterling City. The GC&SF also leased that part of the Pecos and Northern Texas Railway between Coleman and Sweetwater. In 1937 the Santa Fe acquired the Fort Worth and Rio Grande Railway between Fort Worth and Menard and leased it to the GC&SF for operation. With the exception of the Gulf and Inter-State and Pecos and Northern Texas, all of the leased companies were merged into the GC&SF on December 31, 1948. The Pecos and Northern Texas was merged into the Panhandle and Santa Fe Railway Company on the same date, but the portion of track east of Sweetwater continued to be operated under lease by the GC&SF. Another railroad leased by the GC&SF was the Port Bolivar Iron Ore between Longview and Ero. Although the Santa Fe advanced certain funds for the construction of this railroad, it was not a Santa Fe subsidiary and was abandoned in 1927 shortly after the lease expired. The GC&SF owned a 25 percent interest in the Houston Belt and Terminal Railway Company and a one- eighth interest in the Union Terminal Company at Dallas. On June 30, 1957, the company merged the Beaumont Wharf and Terminal Company and the Union Passenger Depot Company of Galveston and on September 2, 1960, merged the Fort Worth Union Passenger Station Company. All three companies were Santa Fe subsidiaries. The GC&SF constructed 355 miles of track before the state law granting sixteen sections of land for each mile of track constructed was repealed. The company received certificates for 3,554,560 acres of vacant unappropriated state land and from the sale of these certificates netted $211,168.06. Under the land grant law the Central and Montgomery received 263,040 acres and the Chicago, Texas and Mexican Central 225,280 acres, but there is no record of the amount received by these roads for the sale of the land. In addition, between 1880 and 1888 the GC&SF received liberal support from individuals as well as cities and counties along its route, totaling nearly $395,000. An additional $89,000 was donated for the construction of the line from Lometa to Eden. Gross earnings in 1892 were nearly $5,000,000, of which $1,125,000 came from passenger revenue. In that year the GC&SF owned 124 locomotives and 2,420 cars. Operating revenues in the Great Depression year of 1933 were $12,742,000, or only 42 percent of earnings in the boom year of 1929. At the end of 1933 the company owned 230 locomotives and 597 cars and operated 1,927 miles of main track, of which 681 miles was leased. Texas accounted for 1,728 miles, Oklahoma for 135 miles, and Louisiana 64 miles. By 1962 owned and leased mileage had increased to 1,991 miles. The increase since 1933 primarily reflected the addition of the former Fort Worth and Rio Grande and the opening in 1955 of a forty-nine mile line between Sanger and Garland, giving the company another entrance into Dallas. In 1962 the GC&SF reported passenger earnings of $1,500,000 and gross earnings of $51,000,000. All equipment was supplied by the Santa Fe as required. Several lines were abandoned, including the twenty-seven miles between Gary and Grigsby, in 1933 and the seventeen miles between Miles and Paint Rock in 1937. In 1959 a total of 111 miles between San Angelo and Sterling City, Cresson and Weatherford, and Brownwood and Brady were also abandoned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1j49n53k No online items Guide to the George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165 Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1999 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the George E. Tillitson M0165 1 Collection on Railroads M0165 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: George E. Tillitson collection on railroads creator: Tillitson, George E. Identifier/Call Number: M0165 Physical Description: 50.5 Linear Feet(9 cartons and 99 manuscript storage boxes) Date (inclusive): 1880-1959 Abstract: Notes on the history of railroads in the United States and Canada. Conditions Governing Access The collection is open for research. Note that material is stored off-site and must be requested at least 36 hours in advance of intended use. Provenance Gift of George E. Tillitson, 1955. Special Notes One very useful feature of the material is further described in the two attached pages. This is the carefully annotated study of a good many of the important large railroads of the United States complete within their own files, these to be found within the official state of incorporation. Here will be included page references to the frequently huge number of small short-line roads that usually wound up by being “taken in” to the larger and expending Class II and I roads. Some of these files, such as the New York Central or the Pennsylvania Railroad are very big themselves. Michigan, Wisconsin, Oregon, and Washington are large because the many lumber railroads have been extensively studied out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Texas
    IMONDS H 2 is THE GEOGRAPHY OF TEXAS PHYSICAL AND POLITICAL BY FREDERIC WILLIAM SIMOXDS, Ph.D. I) PltOFE.SSOK OF GEOLOGY IX THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS REVISED EDITION The eduoattMl citizen should know the state in which he lives GINN AND COMPANY BOSTON • NEW YORK • CHICAGO • LONDON COPYRIGHT, 1905, 1914, BY FREDERIC WILLIAM SIMONDS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 514.5 JUN 17 r9i4 qrbc atftcngum jgregg GINN AND COMPANY* PRO- PRIETORS • BOSTON • U.S.A. ©C1.A376321 : PREFATORY NOTE ^ In the preparation of this text, which necessarily covers a somewhat varied field, I have, in general, been guided by the following works ON PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY The Reports of the Geological Survey of Texas, under the direction of E. T. Dumble, state geologist. Austin, 1890-1893. '' Notes on the Physical Geography of Texas," by Ralph S. Tarr. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia, August 29, 1893. " The Physical Geography of the Texas Region," by Robert T. Hill. Folio 3 of the Topographic Atlas of the United States. Wash- ington, United States Geological Survey, 1900. " Physical Geography, Geology, and Resources of Texas," by E. T. Dumble. Chapter IV, Volume 2, of A Comprehensive History of Texas, edited by Dudley G. Wooten. Dallas, William G. ScarfE, 1898. " The Geology of the Edwards Plateau and the Rio Grande Plain adjacent to Austin and San Antonio, Texas," by Robert T. Hill and T. Wayland Vaughan. Eighteenth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, Part II, pp. 193-321. Washington, 1898. " Geography and Geology of the Black and Grand Prairies, Texas," by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 1920S TEXAS KU KLUX KLAN REVISITED
    THE 1920s TEXAS KU KLUX KLAN REVISITED: WHITE SUPREMACY AND STRUCTURAL POWER IN A RURAL COUNTY A Dissertation by KATHERINE KUEHLER WALTERS Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Carlos K. Blanton Co-Chair of Committee, Walter L. Buenger Committee Members, Wendy Leo Moore Sonia Hernandez Sarah McNamara Head of Department, David Vaught May 2018 Major Subject: History Copyright 2018 Katherine Kuehler Walters ABSTRACT The second Ku Klux Klan made its first public appearance in Texas at a United Confederate Veterans parade in October 1920, then quickly expanded across the state. Founder William J. Simmons created this organization as an exclusive, secretive fraternal group that both celebrated the original Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and responded to contemporary societal concerns of white native-born men and women in post-World- War-I America. Using a propaganda campaign, the organization preached the supremacy of a racialized Anglo-Saxon American identity, defined in terms of contemporary pseudo-scientific racial ideology as white, Protestant, native-born, and anti-radical, to recruit millions of members from across the nation within a few short years. Based on membership rolls and minutes of a Texas Klan chapter, this dissertation argues that, behind a façade of moral law and order, the Ku Klux Klan in rural Texas was a 1920s manifestation of a long-held racist ideology that utilized traditional practices of control through kinship, violence, and structural power to assert and protect white supremacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cane Belt Branch of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company
    q cane belt 10/8/04 1:58 PM Page 303 A History of the Cane Belt Branch of the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company William S. Osborn* ailroad ing is a c apita l-a nd-h orsepower-in te nsive ind ustry, Rwhich may seem anachronistic in the age of the “information high- way.” The industry survives because there remains a need to transport heavy or bulky raw commodities with low value-to-weight ratios, a task often most efficiently accomplishe d by ra il. The twentieth cen tur y opened in the Southwest with a network of many small indepe ndent short-line railroads that connected to the trunklines of multi-state carri- ers; the Railroad Commission of Texas counted seventy-two common carriers active in the state in 1900. By mid-century, ownership of these lines had been greatly consolidated by the larger multi-state carriers in a pattern of conver gence th at con tinued until 1 9 8 0, when th e United States Congress passed the Staggers Rail Deregulation Act. By that time ther e were only thirty-one r ailr oa d companie s opera tin g in Te xas, including seven large ones and twenty-four smaller intrastate lines. But as the twentieth century draws to a close, the pendulum is swinging back toward a division of branch-line and trunk-line ownership as the larger carriers divest themselves of many of their smaller feeder line opera- tions. However, many of the Texas branch lines have not survived; total state wide trackage has declined from about 1 5,5 0 0 mile s in 1 9 5 0 t o about 12,700 miles in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Form 10-900-B OMB No
    NPS Form 10-900b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Depots of Texas, 1873-1965 Texas (Statewide) Table of Contents E. Statement of Historic Contexts See Continuation Sheets 3-9 F. Associated Property Types See Continuation Sheets 10-17 G. Geographical Data The area covered by this multiple property submission includes the State of Texas. Information regarding the acreage of each property, geographic coordinates, and boundary descriptions and justifications are included on each individual nomination form. H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods See Continuation Sheets 18-19 I. Major Bibliographical References See Continuation Sheets 20-21 Figures: See Continuation Sheets 22-35 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C.460 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 250 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, PO Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]